Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Emission Reductions to Meet Phase II of the Nitrogen Oxides (NOX, 69486-69488 [E6-20291]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69486
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Enforcement. The Coast Guard
will begin enforcement of the security
zone described in this section upon the
SBX–1’s departure from Pearl Harbor,
HI.
(e) Informational notice. The Captain
of the Port of Honolulu will cause notice
of the enforcement of the security zone
described in this section to be made by
broadcast notice to mariners.
(f) Authority to enforce. Any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer, and any other Captain of the
Port representative permitted by law,
may enforce this temporary security
zone.
(g) Waiver. The Captain of the Port
may waive any of the requirements of
this rule for any person, vessel, or class
of vessel upon finding that application
of the security zone is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of maritime
security.
(h) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and
50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: November 3, 2006.
V. B. Atkins,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. E6–20355 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
37 CFR Part 253
[Docket No. 2006–2 CRB NCBRA]
Cost of Living Adjustment for
Performance of Musical Compositions
by Colleges and Universities
Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty
Judges, on behalf of the Copyright
Royalty Board of the Library of
Congress, announce a cost of living
adjustment of 1.3% in the royalty rates
paid by colleges, universities, or other
nonprofit educational institutions that
are not affiliated with National Public
Radio for the use of copyrighted
published nondramatic musical
compositions in the ASCAP, BMI and
SESAC repertoires. The cost of living
adjustment is based on the change in the
Consumer Price Index from October
2005 to October 2006.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina
Giuffreda, Attorney Advisor, or Abioye
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:12 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
E. Oyewole, CRB Program Specialist.
Telephone: (202) 707–7658. Telefax:
(202) 252–3423.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
118 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.,
creates a compulsory license for the use
of published nondramatic musical
works and published pictorial, graphic,
and sculptural works in connection
with noncommercial broadcasting.
Terms and rates for this compulsory
license, applicable to parties who are
not subject to privately negotiated
licenses, are published in 37 CFR part
253 and are subject to adjustment at
five-year intervals. 17 U.S.C. 118(c).
The most recent proceeding to
consider the terms and rates for the
section 118 license occurred in 2002. 67
FR 15414 (April 1, 2002). Final
regulations governing the terms and
rates of copyright royalty payments with
respect to certain uses by public
broadcasting entities of published
nondramatic musical works, and
published pictorial, graphic, and
sculptural works for the license period
beginning January 1, 2003, and ending
December 31, 2007, were published in
the Federal Register on December 17,
2002. 67 FR 77170 (December 17, 2002).
Pursuant to these regulations, on
December 1 of each year, the Librarian
shall publish a notice of the change in
the cost of living as determined by the
Consumer Price Index (all consumers,
all items) during the period from the
most recent Index published prior to the
previous notice, to the most recent
Index published prior to December 1 of
that year. 37 CFR 253.10(a). The
regulations also require that the
Librarian publish a revised schedule of
rates for the public performance of
musical compositions in the ASCAP,
BMI, and SESAC repertoires by public
broadcasting entities licensed to
colleges and universities, reflecting the
change in the Consumer Price Index. 37
CFR 253.10(b). Accordingly, the
Copyright Royalty Judges, on behalf of
the Copyright Royalty Board of the
Library of Congress, are hereby
announcing the change in the Consumer
Price Index and performing the annual
cost of living adjustment to the rates set
out in § 253.5(c).
The change in the cost of living as
determined by the Consumer Price
Index (all consumers, all items) during
the period from the most recent Index
published before December 1, 2005, to
the most recent Index published before
December 1, 2006, is 1.3% (2005’s figure
was 199.2; the figure for 2006 is 201.8,
based on 1982–1984 = 100 as a reference
base). Rounding off to the nearest dollar,
the royalty rates for the use of musical
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
compositions in the repertoires of
ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC are $277,
$277, and $90, respectively.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 253
Copyright, Radio, Television.
Final Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, part 253 of title 37 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
I
PART 253–USE OF CERTAIN
COPYRIGHTED WORKS IN
CONNECTION WITH
NONCOMMERCIAL EDUCATIONAL
BROADCASTING
1. The authority citation for part 253
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 118, 801(b)(1) and
803.
2. Section 253.5 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3)
as follows:
I
§ 253.5 Performance of musical
compositions by public broadcasting
entities licensed to colleges and
universities.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) For all such compositions in the
repertory of ASCAP, $277 annually.
(2) For all such compositions in the
repertory of BMI, $277 annually.
(3) For all such compositions in the
repertory of SESAC, $90 annually.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 22, 2006.
James Scott Sledge,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge, Copyright
Royalty Board.
[FR Doc. E6–20110 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0728; FRL–8249–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Emission Reductions to Meet
Phase II of the Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
SIP Call; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects an
error in the rule language of a final rule
pertaining to EPA’s direct final action to
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
convert a conditional approval in the
West Virginia State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to a full approval. The SIP
revision pertains to nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emission reductions required in
West Virginia to meet Phase II of the
NOX SIP Call.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308 or by email at powers.marlyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean
EPA. On September 28, 2006 (71 FR
56881), we published a final rulemaking
action announcing our action to approve
nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission
reductions required in West Virginia to
meet Phase II of the NOX SIP Call. In
that document, we inadvertently
omitted information describing the
Federal Register publication date and
page citation of the approval date for
West Virginia Regulation 45 CSR 1. This
action adds the omitted language.
In rule document E6–15981 published
in the Federal Register on September
28, 2006 (71 FR 56881), on pages 56883
(bottom) and 56884 (top), the revised
rule language described in Amendatory
Instruction Number 2 is corrected to add
a Federal Register publication date and
page citation for each revised entry in
40 CFR 52.2520(c) for West Virginia
Regulation 45 CSR 1.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting an incorrect citation in a
previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:12 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69487
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of
December 1, 2006. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR § 52.2520(c) for West Virginia is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Dated: November 21, 2006
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Regional
Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX—West Virginia
2. In § 52.2520, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising entries for
[45CSR] Series 1, Sections 1–5, 22, 70–
72, 74, 89, 90, and 100 to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.2520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) EPA-Approved Regulations.
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
69488
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP
State citation [Chapter 16–
20 or 45 CSR]
[45 CSR] Series 1 .............
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
45–1–1
45–1–2
45–1–3
45–1–4
45–1–5
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
State effective date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Additional explanation/citation at
40 CFR
§ 52.2565
Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides From Non-Electric Generating Units As a means to Mitigate Transport of
Ozone Precursors
General .........................................................................
5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Definitions .....................................................................
5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Acronyms ......................................................................
5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
NOX Budget Trading Program Applicability .................
Retired Unit Exemption ................................................
5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
*
Section 45–1–22 ................
*
*
*
Information Requirements for NOX Budget Permit Applications.
*
5/1/06
*
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
*
*
Section 45–1–70 ................
Section 45–1–71 ................
Section 45–1–72 ................
*
*
*
General Monitoring Requirements ...............................
Initial Certification and Recertification Procedures ......
Out of Control Periods ..................................................
*
5/1/06
5/1/06
5/1/06
*
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
*
*
Section 45–1–74 ................
*
*
*
Recordkeeping and Reporting ......................................
*
5/1/06
*
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
*
*
Section 45–1–89 ................
Section 45–1–90 ................
*
*
*
Appeal Procedures .......................................................
Requirements for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines.
Requirements for Emissions of NOX from Cement
Manufacturing Kilns.
*
5/1/06
5/1/06
*
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
*
New Section
New Section.
5/1/06
9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Section 45–1–100 ..............
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 201
RIN 0750–AF30
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contracting
Officers’ Representatives (DFARS
Case 2005–D022)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update text pertaining to the
designation of a contracting officer’s
representative. The rule clarifies the
authority of a contracting officer’s
representative and relocates text to the
DFARS companion resource,
Procedures, Guidance, and Information.
DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2006.
13:12 Nov 30, 2006
*
Ms.
Robin Schulze, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), IMD 3C132,
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0326;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2005–D022.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. E6–20291 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
Jkt 211001
A. Background
This final rule revises DFARS text
addressing contracting officers’
representatives. The DFARS changes—
• Clarify the authority of a
contracting officer’s representative; and
• Remove internal DoD procedures
relating to the designation of a
contracting officer’s representative. Text
on this subject has been relocated to the
DFARS companion resource,
Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(PGI), available at https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi.
DoD published a proposed rule at 71
FR 27659 on May 12, 2006. One source
submitted comments on the proposed
rule. That source recommended revising
the rule at 201.602–2(2)(v) to require
that the contracting officer include a
copy of the written designation of the
contracting officer’s representative in
the official contract file. DoD agrees
with the recommended requirement for
file documentation, but, since this is an
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
administrative matter internal to the
Government, DoD has added the
requirement to the corresponding text at
PGI 201.602–2. DoD has adopted the
proposed DFARS rule as a final rule
without change.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule addresses internal DoD
procedural matters and makes no
significant change to DoD contracting
policy.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply, because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 231 (Friday, December 1, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69486-69488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20291]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0728; FRL-8249-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Emission Reductions to Meet Phase II of the Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX) SIP Call; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the rule language of a
final rule pertaining to EPA's direct final action to
[[Page 69487]]
convert a conditional approval in the West Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to a full approval. The SIP revision pertains
to nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission reductions required in
West Virginia to meet Phase II of the NOX SIP Call.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers, (215) 814-2308 or by
e-mail at powers.marlyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean EPA. On September 28, 2006 (71 FR
56881), we published a final rulemaking action announcing our action to
approve nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission reductions required
in West Virginia to meet Phase II of the NOX SIP Call. In
that document, we inadvertently omitted information describing the
Federal Register publication date and page citation of the approval
date for West Virginia Regulation 45 CSR 1. This action adds the
omitted language.
In rule document E6-15981 published in the Federal Register on
September 28, 2006 (71 FR 56881), on pages 56883 (bottom) and 56884
(top), the revised rule language described in Amendatory Instruction
Number 2 is corrected to add a Federal Register publication date and
page citation for each revised entry in 40 CFR 52.2520(c) for West
Virginia Regulation 45 CSR 1.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an incorrect citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of December 1,
2006. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to 40 CFR Sec.
52.2520(c) for West Virginia is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Dated: November 21, 2006
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX--West Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2520, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
entries for [45CSR] Series 1, Sections 1-5, 22, 70-72, 74, 89, 90, and
100 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) EPA-Approved Regulations.
[[Page 69488]]
EPA-Approved Regulations in the West Virginia SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional explanation/
State citation [Chapter 16-20 or 45 Title/subject effective EPA approval date citation at 40 CFR Sec.
CSR] date 52.2565
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[45 CSR] Series 1................... Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides From Non-Electric Generating Units As a means to Mitigate Transport of
Ozone Precursors
Section 45-1-1...................... General......................... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Section 45-1-2...................... Definitions..................... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Section 45-1-3...................... Acronyms........................ 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Section 45-1-4...................... NOX Budget Trading Program 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Applicability.
Section 45-1-5...................... Retired Unit Exemption.......... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
* * * * * * *
Section 45-1-22..................... Information Requirements for NOX 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Budget Permit Applications.
* * * * * * *
Section 45-1-70..................... General Monitoring Requirements. 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Section 45-1-71..................... Initial Certification and 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
Recertification Procedures.
Section 45-1-72..................... Out of Control Periods.......... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
* * * * * * *
Section 45-1-74..................... Recordkeeping and Reporting..... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
* * * * * * *
Section 45-1-89..................... Appeal Procedures............... 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661 New Section
Section 45-1-90..................... Requirements for Stationary 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661 New Section.
Internal Combustion Engines.
Section 45-1-100.................... Requirements for Emissions of 5/1/06 9/28/06, 71 FR 58661
NOX from Cement Manufacturing
Kilns.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-20291 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
