Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices, 69204-69205 [06-9465]
Download as PDF
69204
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 230 / Thursday, November 30, 2006 / Notices
wide rate provide evidence of de jure
and de facto absence of government
control over the company’s export
activities. Accordingly, we will issue a
questionnaire to Qizheng, including a
separate rate section. The review will
proceed if the responses provide
sufficient indication that Qizheng is not
subject to either de jure or de facto
government control with respect to its
exports of brake rotors. However, if
Qizheng does not demonstrate its
eligibility for a separate rate, the
company will be deemed not separate
from other companies that exported
during the POI, and the new shipper
review for Qizheng will be rescinded.
On August 17, 2006, the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (H.R. 4) was
signed into law by Congress. Section
1632 of H.R. 4 temporarily suspends the
authority of the Department to instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to
collect a bond or other security in lieu
of a cash deposit in new shipper
reviews. Therefore, the posting of a
bond or other security under section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act in lieu of a
cash deposit is not available in this case.
Importers of brake rotors exported and
produced by Qizheng must continue to
post a cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties on each entry of
subject merchandise (i.e., brake rotors)
at the PRC–wide entity rate of 43.32
percent.
Interested parties that need access to
proprietary information in this new
shipper review should submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and notice are issued
in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: November 22, 2006.
Susan H. Kuhbach
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–20256 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
[A–570–848]
Helical Spring Lock Washers From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not In Harmony With
Final Results of Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Nov 29, 2006
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: On August 25, 2006, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘Court’’) sustained the final
remand determination made by the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) pursuant to the Court’s
remand of the final results of the
administrative review of Helical Spring
Lock Washers (‘‘HSLWs’’) from the
People’s Republic of China. See
Shakeproof Assembly Components
Division of IL Tool Works, Inc. v. United
States, Consol. Ct. 05–00404, Slip Op.
06–129 (Ct. Int’l Trade Aug. 25, 2006)
(‘‘Shakeproof Assembly’’). This case
arises out of the Department’s October 1,
2002, through September 30, 2003,
administrative review final results. See
Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers
from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 70 FR 28274
(May 17, 2005) (‘‘Final Results’’). The
final judgment in this case was not in
harmony with the Department’s Final
Results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marin Weaver or Charles Riggle, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2336 or (202) 482–
0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In Shakeproof Assembly Components
v. United States, Slip Op. 05–163 (CIT,
Dec. 22, 2005), the Court remanded the
underlying results to the Department for
reconsideration of the methodology
employed to value plating services in
the calculation of the antidumping duty
rate for Hangzhou Spring Washer Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Hangzhou’’).
On May 15, 2006, the Department
issued the draft results of
redetermination pursuant to remand to
Hangzhou and Shakeproof Assembly
Components Division of Illinois Tool
Works Inc. (‘‘Shakeproof’’) for comment.
On May 18, 2006, we received
comments on our draft redetermination
from both parties. On June 2, 2006, the
Department issued its final results of
redetermination pursuant to remand to
the Court. The remand redetermination
explained that the Department found
the Sudha Electroplaters price quote to
be the most reliable information on the
record with which to value zinc plating.
Moreover, based on the information on
the record, the Department found that
this quote should be applied to the
weight of the un-plated lock washers.
Thus, the Department recalculated the
antidumping duty margin for Hangzhou.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On August 25, 2006, the Court sustained
the final redetermination made by the
Department pursuant to the Court’s
remand of the final results of the
administrative review of HSLWs from
the People’s Republic of China. See
Shakeproof Assembly.
In its decision in Timken Co. v.
United States, 893 F. 2d 337, 341 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination, and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
Court’s decision in Shakeproof
Assembly on August 25, 2006,
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Results. This notice
is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, the Department will
continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending a
final and conclusive court decision. The
Court’s ruling has been appealed, and if
it is upheld by the Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to revise cash deposit rates
and liquidate relevant entries covering
the subject merchandise effective
September 4, 2006.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 516A(c)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: November 17, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–20285 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on
Electron Devices
Department of Defense,
Advisory Group on Electron Devices.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on
Electron Devices (AGED) announces a
closed session meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held at
0900, Tuesday, December 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N.
Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA
22203.
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 230 / Thursday, November 30, 2006 / Notices
Ms.
Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis Business
Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800,
Arlington, VA 22203, 703–741–0300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
mission of the Advisory Group is to
provide advice to the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics to the Director of Defense
Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and
through the DDR&E to the Director,
Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency and the Military Departments in
planning and managing an effective and
economical research and development
program in the area of electron devices.
The AGED meeting will be limited to
review of research and development
efforts in electronics and photonics with
a focus on benefits to national defense.
These reviews may form the basis for
research and development programs
initiated by the Military Departments
and Defense Agencies to be conducted
by industry, universities or in
government laboratories. The agenda for
this meeting will include programs on
molecular electronics, microelectronics,
electro-optics, and electronic materials.
Due to unforeseen circumstances, this
announcement does not give the
standard 15-day notification.
In accordance with Section 10(d) of
Pub. L. 92–463, as amended, (5 U.S.C.
App. 2), it has been determined that this
Advisory Group meeting concerns
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and
that accordingly, this meeting will be
closed to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: November 21, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–9465 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP05–357–005]
Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.;
Notice of Motion to Vacate Certificate
in Part
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
November 22, 2006.
Take notice that on November 16,
2006, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline,
L.P. (Creole Trail Pipeline), 717 Texas
Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas
77002, filed in Docket No. CP05–357–
005, a motion to vacate the certificate
authority granted on June 15, 2006, in
Docket Nos. CP05–357–000, et al., to
construct, own and operate one of the
lines, referred to as Line 2, of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Nov 29, 2006
Jkt 211001
originally certificated 116.8-mile, dual
42-inch pipelines. Creole Trail Pipeline
explains that construction of a single 42inch pipeline, referred to as Line 1, is
sufficient for it to satisfy its
transportation service obligations.
The motion is on file with the
Commission and open for public
inspection. This motion is available for
review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on
the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
Any questions regarding the
application should be directed to
Patricia Outtrim, Cheniere Creole Trail
Pipeline, L.P., 717 Texas Avenue, Suite
3100, Houston, Texas 77002, (713) 659–
1361 or Lisa Tonery, King & Spalding
LLP, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, NY 10036, (212) 556–2307.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
listed below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of this filing and all
subsequent filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy of all
filing to the applicant and to every other
party in the proceeding. Only parties to
the proceeding can ask for court review
of Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, other persons do not have
to intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69205
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to this project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project, or in support of or in opposition
to this project, should submit an
original and two copies of their
comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental
commenters will be placed on the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list, will receive copies of the
environmental documents, and will be
notified of meetings associated with the
Commission’s environmental review
process. Environmental commenters
will not be required to serve copies of
filed documents on all other parties.
The Commission’s rules require that
persons filing comments in opposition
to the project provide copies of their
protests only to the applicant. However,
the non-party commenters will not
receive copies of all documents filed by
other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the Internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: December 4, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20258 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP05–357–004]
Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.;
Notice of Amendment
November 22, 2006.
Take notice that on November 16,
2006, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline,
L.P. (Creole Trail Pipeline), 717 Texas
Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas
77002, filed in Docket No. CP05–357–
004, an application to amend its
pending amendment application filed
on August 4, 2006, in Docket No. CP05–
357–003. Creole Trail Pipeline explains
that it was granted certificate
authorization on June 15, 2006, in
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 230 (Thursday, November 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69204-69205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9465]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices
AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a
closed session meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Tuesday, December 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.
[[Page 69205]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis
Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203,
703-741-0300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology and Logistics to the Director of Defense Research and
Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in
planning and managing an effective and economical research and
development program in the area of electron devices.
The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and
development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on
benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for
research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments
and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in
government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include
programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics,
and electronic materials. Due to unforeseen circumstances, this
announcement does not give the standard 15-day notification.
In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5
U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting
concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly,
this meeting will be closed to the public.
Dated: November 21, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-9465 Filed 11-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M