Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum Scheduled for May 16, 2007; Comments Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 71, 69125-69130 [E6-20241]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
Affordable Local and Long Distance
Service (CALLS) Proposal: tariff filing,
quarterly and annual data filings and
cost support information.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
OMB Control Number: 3060–1044.
Title: Review of the Section 251
Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent
Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No.
01–338 and WC Docket No. 04–313,
Order on Remand.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 645
respondents; 645 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 8
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 5,160 hours.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Cost: $103,200.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission is not requesting
respondents to submit confidential
information to the Commission.
However, in certain circumstances,
respondents may voluntarily choose to
submit confidential information
pursuant to applicable confidentiality
rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this information collection
to OMB as a revision after this 60 day
comment period to obtain the full threeyear clearance from them.
In FCC 03–36 (Order) the Commission
adopted rules and regulations designed
to eliminate operational barriers to
competition in the telecommunications
services market and implement certain
provisions of Section 251, including the
unbundled network elements (UNE)
obligations of incumbent local exchange
carriers (LECs). In the Order on Remand
(FCC 04–290) the Commission
responded to a decision by the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia that vacated the ‘‘subdelegation’’ of authority to state
commissions and vacated and remanded
certain nationwide impairment findings,
including mass market switching and
dedicated transport. This resulted in the
removal of the ‘‘State Commission UNE
Proceeding’’ section of this collection.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20243 Filed 11–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC–06–71-A (Auction No. 71);
DA 06–2298; AU Docket No. 06–206]
Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum
Scheduled for May 16, 2007;
Comments Sought on Competitive
Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 71
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
auction of certain broadband Personal
Communications Services (PCS)
licenses scheduled to commence on
May 16, 2007 (Auction No. 71). This
document also seeks comments on
competitive bidding procedures for
Auction No. 71.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
December 4, 2006, and reply comments
are due on or before December 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and reply
comments must be identified by AU
Docket No. 06–206; DA 06–2298. The
Bureau request that a copy of all
comments and reply comments be
submitted electronically to the
following address: auction71@fcc.gov.
In addition, comment and reply
comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal
Service mail (although the Bureau
continues to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Attn: WTB/
ASAD, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET). All hand deliveries
must be held together with rubber bands
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69125
or fasteners. Commercial overnight mail
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to
9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, for auctions legal questions:
Stephen Johnson at (202) 418–0660. For
general auction questions: Roy Knowles
or Linda Sanderson at (717) 338–2888.
Mobility Division, for service rules
questions: Erin McGrath or Michael
Connelly (legal) or Dwain Livingston
(technical) at (202) 418–0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice released on
November 17, 2006. The complete text
of the Auction No. 71 Comment Public
Notice, including attachments and
related Commission documents, is
available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET
Monday through Thursday or from 8:00
a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the
FCC Reference Information Center,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. The
Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice,
including attachments and related
Commission documents also may be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202–
488–5300, facsimile 202–488–5563, or
you may contact BCPI at its Web site:
https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When
ordering documents from BCPI, please
provide the appropriate FCC document
number for example, DA 06–2298. The
Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice
and related documents also are available
on the Internet at the Commission’s Web
site: https://wireless.fcc.gov/
auctions/71/.
I. Introduction
1. The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau (Bureau) announces an auction
of 38 broadband PCS licenses. This
auction, which is designated Auction
No. 71, is scheduled to commence on
May 16, 2007.
II. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction
No. 71
2. The spectrum to be auctioned has
been offered previously in other
auctions but was unsold and/or
returned to the Commission as a result
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
69126
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
of license cancellation or termination. A
complete list of licenses available for
Auction No. 71 is included as
Attachment A of the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice.
3. Auction No. 71 includes licenses
for A, C, D, E, and F blocks of
broadband PCS spectrum. The table
referenced in the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice cross-references
the general rules regarding block/
eligibility status/frequencies of
broadband PCS licenses in these blocks.
That table indicates that the C and F
block licenses are divided into two tiers
according to the population size, with
Tier 1 comprising markets with
population at or above 2.5 million,
based on 2000 decennial census figures,
and Tier 2 comprising the remaining
markets. No Tier 1 licenses will be
offered in Auction No. 71. C1, C2, C3,
and C4 licenses in Tier 2 are generally
available only to entrepreneurs in
closed bidding. This eligibility
restriction no longer applies, however,
to licenses that have been made
available on that basis, but not won, in
any auction beginning on or after March
23, 1999. Thus, certain licenses that
were formerly subject to closed bidding
and available only to entrepreneurs are
now offered in open bidding in Auction
No. 71.
4. Attachment A of the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice list C block
licenses being offered that are available
to all bidders in open bidding, while
others are available only to
entrepreneurs in closed bidding. The A,
B, E, and F block licenses, as well as
certain C block licenses, are available in
open bidding. Size-based bidding
credits will be available for C and F
block licenses won in open bidding. In
order to qualify as an entrepreneur for
closed bidding, an applicant, including
attributable investors and affiliates,
must have had gross revenues of less
than $125 million in each of the last two
years and must have less than $500
million in total assets. Size-based
bidding credits are not available for C
block licenses won in closed bidding or
for licenses in the A, D, or E blocks.
5. Because of the previous history of
licenses for broadband PCS spectrum,
certain of the licenses available in
Auction No. 71 cover less bandwidth
and fewer frequencies than noted in the
table referenced in the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice. In addition, in
some cases, licenses are available for
only part of a market.
6. Incumbency Issues. While much of
the private and common carrier fixed
microwave services (FMS) operating in
the 1850–1990 MHz band (and other
bands) have been relocated to available
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
frequencies in higher bands or to other
media, some FMS licensees may still be
operating in the band. Applicants
should become familiar with the status
of FMS operation and relocation, and
applicable Commission rules and
orders.
III. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction
Procedures
7. The Bureau seeks comment on the
following issues relating to Auction No.
71.
A. Auction Structure
i. Simultaneous Multiple-Round
Auction Design
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all
licenses included in Auction No. 71
using the Commission’s standard
simultaneous multiple-round (SMR)
auction format. This type of auction
offers every license for bid at the same
time and consists of successive bidding
rounds in which eligible bidders may
place bids on individual licenses.
Typically, bidding remains open on all
licenses until bidding stops on every
license. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal.
9. Auction Format. The Bureau has
considered the possibility of using a
simultaneous multiple-round auction
format with package bidding (SMR–PB),
but does not believe that an SMR–PB
format is likely to offer significant
advantages to bidders in Auction No.
71, given the nature of the auction
inventory. Under the Commission’s
SMR–PB rules, bidders can place bids
on any groups of licenses they wish to
win together, with the result that they
win either all the licenses in a group or
none of them. The Bureau’s standard
SMR auction format offers all licenses
for bid at the same time, and allows
bidders to bid on and win multiple
licenses on a license-by-license basis,
thereby facilitating aggregations. The
Bureau believes use of the SMR format
for Auction No. 71 will be the simplest
and most efficient means of auctioning
the licenses in this inventory, and
therefore, the Bureau proposes to
conduct the auction using its standard
SMR auction format. However, if
commenters believe that the SMR–PB
design would offer significant benefits,
the Bureau invites their comments and
request that they describe what specific
factors lead them to that conclusion.
10. Information Available to Bidders
Before and During an Auction. The
Bureau also seeks comment on whether
to implement procedures that would
limit the disclosure of information on
bidder interests and identities relative to
the information procedures that have
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
typically been used for Commission
auctions. Commenters should indicate
what factors support the position they
take on this issue and specifically, how
these factors apply to an auction of this
nature, with a limited number of
localized, mostly geographically noncontiguous licenses. Commenters
should address whether technological
considerations, equipment availability,
or competitive concerns weigh in favor
of or against limiting the disclosure of
information on bidder interests and
identities relative to most past
Commission spectrum auctions, or
whether the Commission should
condition the implementation of such
limits on a measure of the
competitiveness of the auction, such as
the eligibility ratio or a modified version
of the eligibility ratio.
ii. Round Structure
11. The Commission will conduct
Auction No. 71 over the Internet.
Alternatively, telephonic bidding will
also be available via the Auction Bidder
Line. The toll-free telephone number for
telephonic bidding will be provided to
qualified bidders.
12. The auction will consist of
sequential bidding rounds. The initial
bidding schedule will be announced in
a public notice to be released at least
one week before the start of the auction.
13. The Bureau proposes to retain the
discretion to change the bidding
schedule in order to foster an auction
pace that reasonably balances speed
with the bidders’ need to study round
results and adjust their bidding
strategies. Under this proposal, the
Bureau may increase or decrease the
amount of time for the bidding rounds
and review periods, or the number of
rounds per day, depending upon
bidding activity levels and other factors.
The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
iii. Stopping Rule
14. The Bureau has discretion to
establish stopping rules before or during
multiple round auctions in order to
terminate the auction within a
reasonable time. For Auction No. 71, the
Bureau proposes to employ a
simultaneous stopping rule approach. A
simultaneous stopping rule means that
all licenses remain available for bidding
until bidding closes simultaneously on
all licenses. More specifically, bidding
will close simultaneously on all licenses
after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a
proactive waiver, or submits a
withdrawal. Thus, unless circumstances
dictate otherwise, bidding will remain
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
open on all licenses until bidding stops
on every license.
15. Further, the Bureau proposes to
retain the discretion to exercise any of
the following options during Auction
No. 71: (a) Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule. The
modified stopping rule would close the
auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a
waiver, places a withdrawal, or submits
any new bids on any license for which
it is not the provisionally winning
bidder. Thus, absent any other bidding
activity, a bidder placing a new bid on
a license for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not
keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (b) keep the
auction open even if no bidder submits
any new bids, applies a waiver, or
submits a withdrawal. In this event, the
effect will be the same as if a bidder had
applied a waiver. The activity rule,
therefore, will apply as usual and a
bidder with insufficient activity will
either lose bidding eligibility or use a
remaining waiver; and (c) declare that
the auction will end after a specified
number of additional rounds (special
stopping rule). If the Bureau invokes
this special stopping rule, it will accept
bids in the specified final round(s) after
which the auction will close.
16. The Bureau proposes to exercise
these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
auction is proceeding very slowly, there
is minimal overall bidding activity, or it
appears likely that the auction will not
close within a reasonable period of time.
Before exercising these options, the
Bureau is likely to attempt to increase
the pace of the auction by, for example,
increasing the number of bidding
rounds per day and/or changing the
minimum acceptable bid percentage.
The Bureau proposes to retain the
discretion to use such stopping rule
with or without prior announcement
during the auction. The Bureau seeks
comment on these proposals.
iv. Information Relating to Auction
Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
17. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau
proposes that, by public notice or by
announcement during the auction, the
Bureau may delay, suspend, or cancel
the auction in the event of natural
disaster, technical obstacle, evidence of
an auction security breach, unlawful
bidding activity, administrative or
weather necessity, or for any other
reason that affects the fair and efficient
conduct of competitive bidding. The
Bureau may elect to resume the auction
starting from the beginning of the
current round, resume the auction
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
starting from some previous round, or
cancel the auction in its entirety.
Network interruption may cause the
Bureau to delay or suspend the auction.
The Bureau emphasizes that exercise of
this authority is solely within the
discretion of the Bureau, and its use is
not intended to be a substitute for
situations in which bidders may wish to
apply their activity rule waivers. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding
Eligibility
18. The Bureau has delegated
authority and discretion to determine an
appropriate upfront payment for each
license being auctioned. The upfront
payment is a refundable deposit made
by each bidder to establish eligibility to
bid on licenses. Upfront payments
related to the licenses for specific
spectrum subject to auction protect
against frivolous or insincere bidding
and provide the Commission with a
source of funds from which to collect
payments owed at the close of the
auction. With these factors in mind, the
Bureau proposes to calculate upfront
payments on a license-by-license basis
using a formula based on bandwidth
and license area population: $0.05
* MHz * License Area Population with
a minimum of $500 per license.
19. The Bureau further proposes that
the amount of the upfront payment
submitted by a bidder will determine
the bidder’s initial bidding eligibility in
bidding units. The Bureau proposes that
each license be assigned a specific
number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed in Attachment A
of the Auction No. 71 Comment Public
Notice, on a bidding unit per dollar
basis. The number of bidding units for
a given license is fixed and does not
change during the auction as prices rise.
A bidder’s upfront payment is not
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a
bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its
FCC Form 175 as long as the total
number of bidding units associated with
those licenses does not exceed its
current eligibility. Eligibility cannot be
increased during the auction; it can only
remain the same or decrease. Thus, in
calculating its upfront payment amount
and hence its initial bidding eligibility,
an applicant must determine the
maximum number of bidding units it
may wish to bid on (or hold
provisionally winning bids on) in any
single round, and submit an upfront
payment amount covering that total
number of bidding units. Provisionally
winning bids are bids that would
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69127
become final winning bids if the auction
were to close in that given round.
20. The proposed number of bidding
units for each license and associated
upfront payment amounts are listed in
Attachment A of the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice. The Bureau
seeks comment on these proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
21. In order to ensure that the auction
closes within a reasonable period of
time, an activity rule requires bidders to
bid actively throughout the auction,
rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder’s activity
in a round will be the sum of the
bidding units associated with any
licenses upon which it places bids
during the current round and the
bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally
winning bids. Bidders are required to be
active on a specific percentage of their
current bidding eligibility during each
round of the auction. Failure to
maintain the requisite activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in
the bidder’s eligibility, possibly
curtailing or eliminating the bidder’s
ability to place bids in the auction.
22. The Bureau proposes to divide the
auction into two stages, each
characterized by a different activity
requirement. The auction will start in
Stage One. The Bureau proposes that the
auction generally will advance from
Stage One to Stage Two when the
auction activity level, as measured by
the percentage of bidding units
receiving new provisionally winning
bids, is approximately twenty percent or
below for three consecutive rounds of
bidding. However, the Bureau further
proposes that the Bureau retains the
discretion to change stages unilaterally
by announcement during the auction. In
exercising this discretion, the Bureau
will consider a variety of measures of
bidder activity, including, but not
limited to, the auction activity level, the
percentage of licenses (as measured in
bidding units) on which there are new
bids, the number of new bids, and the
percentage of increase in revenue. The
Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
23. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau
proposes the following activity
requirements:
Stage One: In each round of the first
stage of the auction, a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on licenses
representing at least 80 percent of its
current bidding eligibility. Failure to
maintain the required activity level will
result in a reduction in the bidder’s
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
69128
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
bidding eligibility in the next round of
bidding (unless an activity rule waiver
is used). During Stage One, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by fivefourths (5⁄4).
Stage Two: In each round of the
second stage, a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on 95 percent of
its current bidding eligibility. Failure to
maintain the required activity level will
result in a reduction in the bidder’s
bidding eligibility in the next round of
bidding (unless an activity rule waiver
is used). During Stage Two, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by
twenty-nineteenths (20⁄19).
24. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal. Commenters that believe
this activity rule should be modified
should explain their reasoning and
comment on the desirability of an
alternative approach. Commenters are
advised to support their claims with
analyses and suggested alternative
activity rules.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing
Eligibility
25. Use of an activity rule waiver
preserves the bidder’s eligibility despite
the bidder’s activity in the current
round being below the required
minimum level. An activity rule waiver
applies to an entire round of bidding,
not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or
automatic and are principally a
mechanism for auction participants to
avoid the loss of bidding eligibility in
the event that exigent circumstances
prevent them from placing a bid in a
particular round.
26. The FCC Auction System assumes
that a bidder that does not meet the
activity requirement would prefer to
apply an activity rule waiver (if
available) rather than lose bidding
eligibility. Therefore, the system will
automatically apply a waiver at the end
of any bidding round in which a
bidder’s activity level is below the
minimum required unless: (1) The
bidder has no activity rule waivers
remaining; or (2) the bidder overrides
the automatic application of a waiver by
reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the
minimum requirement. If a bidder has
no waivers remaining and does not
satisfy the required activity level, its
eligibility will be permanently reduced,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the
bidder’s ability to place additional bids
in the auction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
27. A bidder with insufficient activity
may wish to reduce its bidding
eligibility rather than use an activity
rule waiver. If so, the bidder must
affirmatively override the automatic
waiver mechanism during the bidding
round by using the reduce eligibility
function in the FCC Auction System. In
this case, the bidder’s eligibility is
permanently reduced to bring the bidder
into compliance with the activity rule as
described above. Reducing eligibility is
an irreversible action. Once eligibility
has been reduced, a bidder will not be
permitted to regain its lost bidding
eligibility, even if the round has not yet
closed.
28. A bidder may apply an activity
rule waiver proactively as a means to
keep the auction open without placing
a bid. If a bidder proactively applies an
activity rule waiver (using the apply
waiver function in the FCC Auction
System) during a bidding round in
which no bids or withdrawals are
submitted, the auction will remain open
and the bidder’s eligibility will be
preserved. An automatic waiver applied
by the FCC Auction System in a round
in which there are no new bids,
withdrawals, or proactive waivers will
not keep the auction open. A bidder
cannot submit a proactive waiver after
submitting a bid in a round, and
submitting a proactive waiver will
preclude a bidder from placing any bids
in that round. Applying a waiver is
irreversible; once a proactive waiver is
submitted, that waiver cannot be
unsubmitted, even if the round has not
yet closed.
29. The Bureau proposes that each
bidder in Auction No. 71 be provided
with three activity rule waivers that may
be used at the bidder’s discretion during
the course of the auction as set forth
above. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal.
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening
Bids
30. The Bureau proposes to establish
minimum opening bid amounts for
Auction No. 71. The Bureau believes a
minimum opening bid amount, which
has been used in other auctions, is an
effective bidding tool for accelerating
the competitive bidding process. The
Bureau does not propose a separate
reserve price for the licenses to be
offered in Auction No. 71.
31. Specifically, for Auction No. 71,
the Bureau proposes to calculate
minimum opening bid amounts on a
license-by-license basis using a formula
based on bandwidth and license area
population as follows: $0.05 * MHz *
License Area Population with a
minimum of $500 per license. This
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed minimum opening bid amount
for each license available in Auction No.
71 is set forth in Attachment A of the
Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice.
The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
32. If commenters believe that this
minimum opening bid amount will
result in unsold licenses, or is not a
reasonable amount, or should instead
operate as a reserve price, they should
explain why this is so, and comment on
the desirability of an alternative
approach. Commenters are advised to
support their claims with valuation
analyses and suggested reserve prices or
minimum opening bid amount levels or
formulas. In establishing minimum
opening bid amounts, the Bureau
particularly seeks comment on such
factors as the amount of spectrum being
auctioned, levels of incumbency, the
availability of technology to provide
service, the size of the service areas,
issues of interference with other
spectrum bands and any other relevant
factors that could reasonably have an
impact on valuation of the licenses
being auctioned. The Bureau seeks
comment on whether, consistent with
Section 309(j) of the Communications
Act, the public interest would be served
by having no minimum opening bid
amount or reserve price.
v. Bid Amounts
33. The Bureau proposes that, in each
round, eligible bidders be able to place
a bid on a given license in any of nine
different amounts. Under this proposal,
the FCC Auction System interface will
list the nine acceptable bid amounts for
each license.
34. The first of the nine acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a license will
be equal to its minimum opening bid
amount until there is a provisionally
winning bid for the license. After there
is a provisionally winning bid for a
license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to
the amount of the provisionally winning
bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula. In general,
the percentage will be higher for a
license receiving many bids than for a
license receiving few bids. In the case of
a license for which the provisionally
winning bid has been withdrawn, the
minimum acceptable bid amount will
equal the second highest bid received
for the license.
35. The percentage of the
provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid
amount (the additional percentage) is
calculated at the end of each round,
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
based on an activity index which is a
weighted average of the number of bids
in that round and the activity index
from the prior round. Specifically, the
activity index is equal to a weighting
factor times the number of bids on the
license in the most recent bidding round
plus one minus the weighting factor
times the activity index from the prior
round. The additional percentage is
determined as one plus the activity
index times a minimum percentage
amount, with the result not to exceed a
given maximum. The additional
percentage is then multiplied by the
provisionally winning bid amount to
obtain the minimum acceptable bid for
the next round. The Commission will
initially set the weighting factor at 0.5,
the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%),
and the maximum percentage at 0.2
(20%). Hence, at these initial settings,
the minimum acceptable bid for a
license will be between ten percent and
twenty percent higher than the
provisionally winning bid, depending
upon the bidding activity for the
license. Equations and examples are
shown in Attachment B of the Auction
No. 71 Comment Public Notice.
36. The eight additional bid amounts
are calculated using the minimum
acceptable bid amount and a bid
increment percentage. The first
additional acceptable bid amount equals
the minimum acceptable bid amount
times one plus the bid increment
percentage, rounded. If, for example, the
bid increment percentage is ten percent,
the calculation is (minimum acceptable
bid amount) * (1 + 0.1), rounded, or
(minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.1,
rounded; the second additional
acceptable bid amount equals the
minimum acceptable bid amount times
one plus two times the bid increment
percentage, rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.2, rounded;
the third additional acceptable bid
amount equals the minimum acceptable
bid amount times one plus three times
the bid increment percentage, rounded,
or (minimum acceptable bid amount) *
1.3, rounded; etc. The Bureau will
round the results of these calculations,
as well as the calculations to determine
the minimum acceptable bid amounts,
using its standard rounding procedures.
For Auction No. 71, the Bureau
proposes to use a bid increment
percentage of ten percent to calculate
the eight additional acceptable bid
amounts.
37. The Bureau retains the discretion
to change the minimum acceptable bid
amounts, the parameters of the formula
to determine the percentage of the
provisionally winning bid used to
determine the minimum acceptable bid,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
and the bid increment percentage if it
determines that circumstances so
dictate. The Bureau will do so by
announcement in the FCC Auction
System during the auction. The Bureau
seeks comment on its proposals for
minimum acceptable bids amount and
additional percentages as described in
the Auction No. 71 Comment Public
Notice.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
38. Provisionally winning bids are
bids that would become final winning
bids if the auction were to close in that
given round. At the end of a bidding
round, a provisionally winning bid for
each license will be determined based
on the highest bid amount received for
the license. In the event of identical
high bid amounts being submitted on a
license in a given round (i.e., tied bids),
the Bureau will use a random number
generator to select a single provisionally
winning bid from among the tied bids.
The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can
submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to
end with no other bids being placed, the
winning bidder would be the one that
placed the provisionally winning bid. If
any bids are received on the license in
a subsequent round, the provisionally
winning bid again will be determined
by the highest bid amount received for
the license.
39. A provisionally winning bid will
remain the provisionally winning bid
until there is a higher bid on the license
at the close of a subsequent round,
unless the provisionally winning bid is
withdrawn. Bidders are reminded that
provisionally winning bids count
toward activity for purposes of the
activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
40. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau
proposes the following bid removal
procedures. Before the close of a
bidding round, a bidder has the option
of removing any bid placed in that
round. By removing selected bids in the
FCC Auction System, a bidder may
effectively unsubmit any bid placed
within that round. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder
removing a bid placed in the same
round is not subject to a withdrawal
payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
may no longer remove a bid.
41. A bidder may withdraw its
provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC
Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning
bid(s) is subject to the bid withdrawal
payment provisions of the Commission
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69129
rules. The Bureau seeks comment on
these bid removal and bid withdrawal
procedures.
42. The Bureau proposes to limit each
bidder to withdrawing provisionally
winning bids in no more than two
rounds during the course of the auction.
The two rounds in which withdrawals
may be used will be at the bidder’s
discretion; withdrawals otherwise must
be in accordance with the Commission’s
rules. There is no limit on the number
of provisionally winning bids that may
be withdrawn in either of the rounds in
which withdrawals are used.
Withdrawals will remain subject to the
bid withdrawal payment provisions
specified in the Commission’s rules.
C. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal
Payment Percentage
43. The Bureau seeks comment on the
appropriate percentage of a withdrawn
bid that should be assessed as an
interim withdrawal payment, in the
event that a final withdrawal payment
cannot be determined at the close of the
auction. In general, the Commission’s
rules provide that a bidder that
withdraws a bid during an auction is
subject to a withdrawal payment equal
to the difference between the amount of
the withdrawn bid and the amount of
the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). However, if a
license for which there has been a
withdrawn bid is neither subject to a
subsequent higher bid nor won in the
same auction, the final withdrawal
payment cannot be calculated until a
corresponding license is subject to a
higher bid or won in a subsequent
auction. When that final payment
cannot yet be calculated, the bidder
responsible for the withdrawn bid is
assessed an interim bid withdrawal
payment, which will be applied toward
any final bid withdrawal payment that
is ultimately assessed. The Commission
recently amended its rules to provide
that in advance of the auction, the
Commission shall establish the
percentage of the withdrawn bid to be
assessed as an interim bid withdrawal
payment between three percent and
twenty percent.
44. The Commission has indicated
that the level of the interim withdrawal
payment in a particular auction will be
based on the nature of the service and
the inventory of the licenses being
offered. Balancing the potential need for
bidders to use withdrawals to avoid
winning incomplete combinations of
licenses with interest in deterring
abuses of its bidding, the Bureau
proposes a percentage below the
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
69130
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
summaries of the substance of the
presentations and not merely a listing of
the subjects discussed. More than a one
or two sentence description of the views
and arguments presented is generally
required. Other rules pertaining to oral
and written ex parte presentations in
permit-but-disclose proceedings are set
forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s
rules.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default
Payment Percentage
45. Any winning bidder that defaults
or is disqualified after the close of an
auction (i.e., fails to remit the required
down payment within the prescribed
period of time, fails to submit a timely
long-form application, fails to make full
payment, or is otherwise disqualified) is
liable for a default payment under 47
CFR 1.2104(g)(2). This payment consists
of a deficiency payment, equal to the
difference between the amount of the
bidder’s bid and the amount of the
winning bid the next time a license
covering the same spectrum is won in
an auction, plus an additional payment
equal to a percentage of the defaulter’s
bid or of the subsequent winning bid,
whichever is less. Until recently this
additional payment for noncombinatorial auctions has been set at
three percent of the defaulter’s bid or of
the subsequent winning bid, whichever
is less.
46. The CSEA/Part 1 Report and
Order, 71 FR 6214, February 7, 2006,
modified § 1.2104(g)(2) by, inter alia,
increasing the three percent limit on the
additional default payment for noncombinatorial auctions to twenty
percent. Under the modified rule, the
Commission will, in advance of each
non-combinatorial auction, establish an
additional default payment for that
auction of three percent up to a
maximum of twenty percent. As the
Commission has indicated, the level of
this payment in each case will be based
on the nature of the service and the
inventory of the licenses being offered.
47. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau
proposes to establish an additional
default payment of ten percent.
Balancing these considerations, the
Bureau proposes an additional default
payment of ten percent of the relevant
bid. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
maximum twenty percent permitted
under the current rules but above the
three percent previously provided by
the Commission’s rules. Specifically,
the Bureau proposes to establish the
percentage of the withdrawn bid to be
assessed as an interim bid withdrawal
payment at fifteen percent for this
auction. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. E6–20241 Filed 11–28–06; 8:45 am]
IV. Conclusion
48. This proceeding has been
designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the
Commission’s ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing
the presentations must contain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MEDIATION AND
CONCILIATION SERVICE
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service
ACTION: Notice of Forms R–22, R–19, R–
43 and F–7 to be submitted for
extension to the Office of Management
and Budget.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
four information collection requests
contained among the Federal Mediation
and Conciliation Service (FMCS) agency
forms have come up for renewal. FMCS
will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for review
of these four FMCS forms: Arbitrator’s
Report and Fee Statement (Agency Form
R–19), Arbitrator’s Personal Data
Questionnaire (Agency Form R–22),
Request for Arbitration Services
(Agency Form R–43) and Notice to
Mediation Agencies (Agency Form F–7).
The request will seek OMB approval for
a three-year extension with an
expiration date of January 31, 2010, for
Forms R–19, R–22, R–43 and F–7. FMCS
is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the collections as described
below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
by mail to the Office of Arbitration
Services, Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service, 2100 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20427 or by
contacting the person whose name
appears under the section headed FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Comments may be submitted also by
fax at (202) 606–3749 or electronic mail
(e-mail) to arbitration@fmcs.gov. All
comments must be identified by the
appropriate agency form number.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
No confidential business information
(CBI) should be submitted through email. Information submitted as a
comment concerning this document
may be claimed confidential by marking
any part or all of the information as
‘‘CBI’’. Information so marked will not
be disclosed but a copy of the comment
that does contain CBI must be submitted
for inclusion in the public record. FMCS
may disclose information not marked
confidential publicly without prior
notice. All written comments will be
available for inspection in Room 704 at
the Washington, DC address above from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vella M. Traynham, Director of
Arbitration Services, FMCS, 2100 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20427.
Telephone (202) 606–5111; Fax (202)
606–3749.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
each of the agency forms are available
from the Office of Arbitration Services
by calling, faxing or writing Vella M.
Traynham at the address above. Please
ask for the form by title and agency form
number.
I. Information Collection Requests
FMCS is seeking comments on the
following Information Collection
Requests (ICRs).
Title: Arbitrator’s Personal Data
Questionnaire; Form R–22; OMB No.
3076–0001; Expiration date: January 31,
2006.
Type of Request: Extension of a
previously approved collection with no
change in the substance or method of
collection.
Affected Entities: Parties affected by
this information collection are
individuals who apply for admission to
the FMCS Roster of Arbitrators.
Frequency: Individuals complete this
form once, which is at the time of
application to the FMCS Roster of
Arbitrators.
Abstract: Title II of the Labor
Management Relations Act of 1947 (Pub.
L. 90–101) as amended in 1959 (Pub. L.
86–257) and 1974 (Pub. L. 93–360),
states that it is the labor policy of the
United States that ‘‘the settlement of
issues between employers and
employees through collective bargaining
may be advanced by making available
full and adequate governmental
facilities for conciliation, mediation,
and voluntary arbitration to aid and
encourage employers and
representatives of their employees to
reach and maintain agreements
concerning rates of pay, hours, and
working conditions, and to make all
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69125-69130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20241]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC-06-71-A (Auction No. 71); DA 06-2298; AU Docket No. 06-
206]
Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum Scheduled for May 16, 2007;
Comments Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 71
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the auction of certain broadband
Personal Communications Services (PCS) licenses scheduled to commence
on May 16, 2007 (Auction No. 71). This document also seeks comments on
competitive bidding procedures for Auction No. 71.
DATES: Comments are due on or before December 4, 2006, and reply
comments are due on or before December 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and reply comments must be identified by AU Docket
No. 06-206; DA 06-2298. The Bureau request that a copy of all comments
and reply comments be submitted electronically to the following
address: auction71@fcc.gov. In addition, comment and reply comments may
be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the Bureau
continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail).
All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Attn: WTB/
ASAD, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time (ET). All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, for auctions legal questions:
Stephen Johnson at (202) 418-0660. For general auction questions: Roy
Knowles or Linda Sanderson at (717) 338-2888. Mobility Division, for
service rules questions: Erin McGrath or Michael Connelly (legal) or
Dwain Livingston (technical) at (202) 418-0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice released on November 17, 2006. The complete text
of the Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice, including attachments and
related Commission documents, is available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday or from
8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC
20554. The Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice, including attachments
and related Commission documents also may be purchased from the
Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.
(BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC
20554, telephone 202-488-5300, facsimile 202-488-5563, or you may
contact BCPI at its Web site: https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When ordering
documents from BCPI, please provide the appropriate FCC document number
for example, DA 06-2298. The Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice and
related documents also are available on the Internet at the
Commission's Web site: https://wireless.fcc.gov/ auctions/71/.
I. Introduction
1. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) announces an
auction of 38 broadband PCS licenses. This auction, which is designated
Auction No. 71, is scheduled to commence on May 16, 2007.
II. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction No. 71
2. The spectrum to be auctioned has been offered previously in
other auctions but was unsold and/or returned to the Commission as a
result
[[Page 69126]]
of license cancellation or termination. A complete list of licenses
available for Auction No. 71 is included as Attachment A of the Auction
No. 71 Comment Public Notice.
3. Auction No. 71 includes licenses for A, C, D, E, and F blocks of
broadband PCS spectrum. The table referenced in the Auction No. 71
Comment Public Notice cross-references the general rules regarding
block/eligibility status/frequencies of broadband PCS licenses in these
blocks. That table indicates that the C and F block licenses are
divided into two tiers according to the population size, with Tier 1
comprising markets with population at or above 2.5 million, based on
2000 decennial census figures, and Tier 2 comprising the remaining
markets. No Tier 1 licenses will be offered in Auction No. 71. C1, C2,
C3, and C4 licenses in Tier 2 are generally available only to
entrepreneurs in closed bidding. This eligibility restriction no longer
applies, however, to licenses that have been made available on that
basis, but not won, in any auction beginning on or after March 23,
1999. Thus, certain licenses that were formerly subject to closed
bidding and available only to entrepreneurs are now offered in open
bidding in Auction No. 71.
4. Attachment A of the Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice list C
block licenses being offered that are available to all bidders in open
bidding, while others are available only to entrepreneurs in closed
bidding. The A, B, E, and F block licenses, as well as certain C block
licenses, are available in open bidding. Size-based bidding credits
will be available for C and F block licenses won in open bidding. In
order to qualify as an entrepreneur for closed bidding, an applicant,
including attributable investors and affiliates, must have had gross
revenues of less than $125 million in each of the last two years and
must have less than $500 million in total assets. Size-based bidding
credits are not available for C block licenses won in closed bidding or
for licenses in the A, D, or E blocks.
5. Because of the previous history of licenses for broadband PCS
spectrum, certain of the licenses available in Auction No. 71 cover
less bandwidth and fewer frequencies than noted in the table referenced
in the Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice. In addition, in some
cases, licenses are available for only part of a market.
6. Incumbency Issues. While much of the private and common carrier
fixed microwave services (FMS) operating in the 1850-1990 MHz band (and
other bands) have been relocated to available frequencies in higher
bands or to other media, some FMS licensees may still be operating in
the band. Applicants should become familiar with the status of FMS
operation and relocation, and applicable Commission rules and orders.
III. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction Procedures
7. The Bureau seeks comment on the following issues relating to
Auction No. 71.
A. Auction Structure
i. Simultaneous Multiple-Round Auction Design
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all licenses included in Auction
No. 71 using the Commission's standard simultaneous multiple-round
(SMR) auction format. This type of auction offers every license for bid
at the same time and consists of successive bidding rounds in which
eligible bidders may place bids on individual licenses. Typically,
bidding remains open on all licenses until bidding stops on every
license. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
9. Auction Format. The Bureau has considered the possibility of
using a simultaneous multiple-round auction format with package bidding
(SMR-PB), but does not believe that an SMR-PB format is likely to offer
significant advantages to bidders in Auction No. 71, given the nature
of the auction inventory. Under the Commission's SMR-PB rules, bidders
can place bids on any groups of licenses they wish to win together,
with the result that they win either all the licenses in a group or
none of them. The Bureau's standard SMR auction format offers all
licenses for bid at the same time, and allows bidders to bid on and win
multiple licenses on a license-by-license basis, thereby facilitating
aggregations. The Bureau believes use of the SMR format for Auction No.
71 will be the simplest and most efficient means of auctioning the
licenses in this inventory, and therefore, the Bureau proposes to
conduct the auction using its standard SMR auction format. However, if
commenters believe that the SMR-PB design would offer significant
benefits, the Bureau invites their comments and request that they
describe what specific factors lead them to that conclusion.
10. Information Available to Bidders Before and During an Auction.
The Bureau also seeks comment on whether to implement procedures that
would limit the disclosure of information on bidder interests and
identities relative to the information procedures that have typically
been used for Commission auctions. Commenters should indicate what
factors support the position they take on this issue and specifically,
how these factors apply to an auction of this nature, with a limited
number of localized, mostly geographically non-contiguous licenses.
Commenters should address whether technological considerations,
equipment availability, or competitive concerns weigh in favor of or
against limiting the disclosure of information on bidder interests and
identities relative to most past Commission spectrum auctions, or
whether the Commission should condition the implementation of such
limits on a measure of the competitiveness of the auction, such as the
eligibility ratio or a modified version of the eligibility ratio.
ii. Round Structure
11. The Commission will conduct Auction No. 71 over the Internet.
Alternatively, telephonic bidding will also be available via the
Auction Bidder Line. The toll-free telephone number for telephonic
bidding will be provided to qualified bidders.
12. The auction will consist of sequential bidding rounds. The
initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public notice to be
released at least one week before the start of the auction.
13. The Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to change the
bidding schedule in order to foster an auction pace that reasonably
balances speed with the bidders' need to study round results and adjust
their bidding strategies. Under this proposal, the Bureau may increase
or decrease the amount of time for the bidding rounds and review
periods, or the number of rounds per day, depending upon bidding
activity levels and other factors. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
iii. Stopping Rule
14. The Bureau has discretion to establish stopping rules before or
during multiple round auctions in order to terminate the auction within
a reasonable time. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes to employ a
simultaneous stopping rule approach. A simultaneous stopping rule means
that all licenses remain available for bidding until bidding closes
simultaneously on all licenses. More specifically, bidding will close
simultaneously on all licenses after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a proactive waiver, or submits a
withdrawal. Thus, unless circumstances dictate otherwise, bidding will
remain
[[Page 69127]]
open on all licenses until bidding stops on every license.
15. Further, the Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to
exercise any of the following options during Auction No. 71: (a) Use a
modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule. The modified
stopping rule would close the auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a waiver, places a withdrawal, or
submits any new bids on any license for which it is not the
provisionally winning bidder. Thus, absent any other bidding activity,
a bidder placing a new bid on a license for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (b) keep the auction open even if no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a waiver, or submits a withdrawal. In
this event, the effect will be the same as if a bidder had applied a
waiver. The activity rule, therefore, will apply as usual and a bidder
with insufficient activity will either lose bidding eligibility or use
a remaining waiver; and (c) declare that the auction will end after a
specified number of additional rounds (special stopping rule). If the
Bureau invokes this special stopping rule, it will accept bids in the
specified final round(s) after which the auction will close.
16. The Bureau proposes to exercise these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the auction is proceeding very
slowly, there is minimal overall bidding activity, or it appears likely
that the auction will not close within a reasonable period of time.
Before exercising these options, the Bureau is likely to attempt to
increase the pace of the auction by, for example, increasing the number
of bidding rounds per day and/or changing the minimum acceptable bid
percentage. The Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to use such
stopping rule with or without prior announcement during the auction.
The Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
iv. Information Relating to Auction Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
17. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes that, by public notice
or by announcement during the auction, the Bureau may delay, suspend,
or cancel the auction in the event of natural disaster, technical
obstacle, evidence of an auction security breach, unlawful bidding
activity, administrative or weather necessity, or for any other reason
that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive bidding. The
Bureau may elect to resume the auction starting from the beginning of
the current round, resume the auction starting from some previous
round, or cancel the auction in its entirety. Network interruption may
cause the Bureau to delay or suspend the auction. The Bureau emphasizes
that exercise of this authority is solely within the discretion of the
Bureau, and its use is not intended to be a substitute for situations
in which bidders may wish to apply their activity rule waivers. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility
18. The Bureau has delegated authority and discretion to determine
an appropriate upfront payment for each license being auctioned. The
upfront payment is a refundable deposit made by each bidder to
establish eligibility to bid on licenses. Upfront payments related to
the licenses for specific spectrum subject to auction protect against
frivolous or insincere bidding and provide the Commission with a source
of funds from which to collect payments owed at the close of the
auction. With these factors in mind, the Bureau proposes to calculate
upfront payments on a license-by-license basis using a formula based on
bandwidth and license area population: $0.05 * MHz * License Area
Population with a minimum of $500 per license.
19. The Bureau further proposes that the amount of the upfront
payment submitted by a bidder will determine the bidder's initial
bidding eligibility in bidding units. The Bureau proposes that each
license be assigned a specific number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed in Attachment A of the Auction No. 71 Comment
Public Notice, on a bidding unit per dollar basis. The number of
bidding units for a given license is fixed and does not change during
the auction as prices rise. A bidder's upfront payment is not
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its FCC Form 175 as long as the
total number of bidding units associated with those licenses does not
exceed its current eligibility. Eligibility cannot be increased during
the auction; it can only remain the same or decrease. Thus, in
calculating its upfront payment amount and hence its initial bidding
eligibility, an applicant must determine the maximum number of bidding
units it may wish to bid on (or hold provisionally winning bids on) in
any single round, and submit an upfront payment amount covering that
total number of bidding units. Provisionally winning bids are bids that
would become final winning bids if the auction were to close in that
given round.
20. The proposed number of bidding units for each license and
associated upfront payment amounts are listed in Attachment A of the
Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice. The Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
21. In order to ensure that the auction closes within a reasonable
period of time, an activity rule requires bidders to bid actively
throughout the auction, rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder's activity in a round will be the sum of
the bidding units associated with any licenses upon which it places
bids during the current round and the bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally winning bids. Bidders are
required to be active on a specific percentage of their current bidding
eligibility during each round of the auction. Failure to maintain the
requisite activity level will result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in the bidder's eligibility,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the bidder's ability to place bids
in the auction.
22. The Bureau proposes to divide the auction into two stages, each
characterized by a different activity requirement. The auction will
start in Stage One. The Bureau proposes that the auction generally will
advance from Stage One to Stage Two when the auction activity level, as
measured by the percentage of bidding units receiving new provisionally
winning bids, is approximately twenty percent or below for three
consecutive rounds of bidding. However, the Bureau further proposes
that the Bureau retains the discretion to change stages unilaterally by
announcement during the auction. In exercising this discretion, the
Bureau will consider a variety of measures of bidder activity,
including, but not limited to, the auction activity level, the
percentage of licenses (as measured in bidding units) on which there
are new bids, the number of new bids, and the percentage of increase in
revenue. The Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
23. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes the following activity
requirements:
Stage One: In each round of the first stage of the auction, a
bidder desiring to maintain its current bidding eligibility is required
to be active on licenses representing at least 80 percent of its
current bidding eligibility. Failure to maintain the required activity
level will result in a reduction in the bidder's
[[Page 69128]]
bidding eligibility in the next round of bidding (unless an activity
rule waiver is used). During Stage One, a bidder's reduced eligibility
for the next round will be calculated by multiplying the bidder's
current round activity by five-fourths (\5/4\).
Stage Two: In each round of the second stage, a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility is required to be active on 95
percent of its current bidding eligibility. Failure to maintain the
required activity level will result in a reduction in the bidder's
bidding eligibility in the next round of bidding (unless an activity
rule waiver is used). During Stage Two, a bidder's reduced eligibility
for the next round will be calculated by multiplying the bidder's
current round activity by twenty-nineteenths (\20/19\).
24. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal. Commenters that
believe this activity rule should be modified should explain their
reasoning and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach.
Commenters are advised to support their claims with analyses and
suggested alternative activity rules.
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing Eligibility
25. Use of an activity rule waiver preserves the bidder's
eligibility despite the bidder's activity in the current round being
below the required minimum level. An activity rule waiver applies to an
entire round of bidding, not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or automatic and are principally a
mechanism for auction participants to avoid the loss of bidding
eligibility in the event that exigent circumstances prevent them from
placing a bid in a particular round.
26. The FCC Auction System assumes that a bidder that does not meet
the activity requirement would prefer to apply an activity rule waiver
(if available) rather than lose bidding eligibility. Therefore, the
system will automatically apply a waiver at the end of any bidding
round in which a bidder's activity level is below the minimum required
unless: (1) The bidder has no activity rule waivers remaining; or (2)
the bidder overrides the automatic application of a waiver by reducing
eligibility, thereby meeting the minimum requirement. If a bidder has
no waivers remaining and does not satisfy the required activity level,
its eligibility will be permanently reduced, possibly curtailing or
eliminating the bidder's ability to place additional bids in the
auction.
27. A bidder with insufficient activity may wish to reduce its
bidding eligibility rather than use an activity rule waiver. If so, the
bidder must affirmatively override the automatic waiver mechanism
during the bidding round by using the reduce eligibility function in
the FCC Auction System. In this case, the bidder's eligibility is
permanently reduced to bring the bidder into compliance with the
activity rule as described above. Reducing eligibility is an
irreversible action. Once eligibility has been reduced, a bidder will
not be permitted to regain its lost bidding eligibility, even if the
round has not yet closed.
28. A bidder may apply an activity rule waiver proactively as a
means to keep the auction open without placing a bid. If a bidder
proactively applies an activity rule waiver (using the apply waiver
function in the FCC Auction System) during a bidding round in which no
bids or withdrawals are submitted, the auction will remain open and the
bidder's eligibility will be preserved. An automatic waiver applied by
the FCC Auction System in a round in which there are no new bids,
withdrawals, or proactive waivers will not keep the auction open. A
bidder cannot submit a proactive waiver after submitting a bid in a
round, and submitting a proactive waiver will preclude a bidder from
placing any bids in that round. Applying a waiver is irreversible; once
a proactive waiver is submitted, that waiver cannot be unsubmitted,
even if the round has not yet closed.
29. The Bureau proposes that each bidder in Auction No. 71 be
provided with three activity rule waivers that may be used at the
bidder's discretion during the course of the auction as set forth
above. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening Bids
30. The Bureau proposes to establish minimum opening bid amounts
for Auction No. 71. The Bureau believes a minimum opening bid amount,
which has been used in other auctions, is an effective bidding tool for
accelerating the competitive bidding process. The Bureau does not
propose a separate reserve price for the licenses to be offered in
Auction No. 71.
31. Specifically, for Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes to
calculate minimum opening bid amounts on a license-by-license basis
using a formula based on bandwidth and license area population as
follows: $0.05 * MHz * License Area Population with a minimum of $500
per license. This proposed minimum opening bid amount for each license
available in Auction No. 71 is set forth in Attachment A of the Auction
No. 71 Comment Public Notice. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
32. If commenters believe that this minimum opening bid amount will
result in unsold licenses, or is not a reasonable amount, or should
instead operate as a reserve price, they should explain why this is so,
and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach. Commenters
are advised to support their claims with valuation analyses and
suggested reserve prices or minimum opening bid amount levels or
formulas. In establishing minimum opening bid amounts, the Bureau
particularly seeks comment on such factors as the amount of spectrum
being auctioned, levels of incumbency, the availability of technology
to provide service, the size of the service areas, issues of
interference with other spectrum bands and any other relevant factors
that could reasonably have an impact on valuation of the licenses being
auctioned. The Bureau seeks comment on whether, consistent with Section
309(j) of the Communications Act, the public interest would be served
by having no minimum opening bid amount or reserve price.
v. Bid Amounts
33. The Bureau proposes that, in each round, eligible bidders be
able to place a bid on a given license in any of nine different
amounts. Under this proposal, the FCC Auction System interface will
list the nine acceptable bid amounts for each license.
34. The first of the nine acceptable bid amounts is called the
minimum acceptable bid amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount for a
license will be equal to its minimum opening bid amount until there is
a provisionally winning bid for the license. After there is a
provisionally winning bid for a license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to the amount of the
provisionally winning bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula. In general, the percentage will be higher
for a license receiving many bids than for a license receiving few
bids. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid
has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the
second highest bid received for the license.
35. The percentage of the provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid amount (the additional percentage)
is calculated at the end of each round,
[[Page 69129]]
based on an activity index which is a weighted average of the number of
bids in that round and the activity index from the prior round.
Specifically, the activity index is equal to a weighting factor times
the number of bids on the license in the most recent bidding round plus
one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior
round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity
index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed
a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the
provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid
for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting
factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum
percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum
acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty
percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the
bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in
Attachment B of the Auction No. 71 Comment Public Notice.
36. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the
minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage. The first
additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid
amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded. If, for
example, the bid increment percentage is ten percent, the calculation
is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.1), rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.1, rounded; the second additional acceptable
bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two
times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid
amount) * 1.2, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount
equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the
bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) *
1.3, rounded; etc. The Bureau will round the results of these
calculations, as well as the calculations to determine the minimum
acceptable bid amounts, using its standard rounding procedures. For
Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes to use a bid increment percentage
of ten percent to calculate the eight additional acceptable bid
amounts.
37. The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum
acceptable bid amounts, the parameters of the formula to determine the
percentage of the provisionally winning bid used to determine the
minimum acceptable bid, and the bid increment percentage if it
determines that circumstances so dictate. The Bureau will do so by
announcement in the FCC Auction System during the auction. The Bureau
seeks comment on its proposals for minimum acceptable bids amount and
additional percentages as described in the Auction No. 71 Comment
Public Notice.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
38. Provisionally winning bids are bids that would become final
winning bids if the auction were to close in that given round. At the
end of a bidding round, a provisionally winning bid for each license
will be determined based on the highest bid amount received for the
license. In the event of identical high bid amounts being submitted on
a license in a given round (i.e., tied bids), the Bureau will use a
random number generator to select a single provisionally winning bid
from among the tied bids. The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to end with no other bids being
placed, the winning bidder would be the one that placed the
provisionally winning bid. If any bids are received on the license in a
subsequent round, the provisionally winning bid again will be
determined by the highest bid amount received for the license.
39. A provisionally winning bid will remain the provisionally
winning bid until there is a higher bid on the license at the close of
a subsequent round, unless the provisionally winning bid is withdrawn.
Bidders are reminded that provisionally winning bids count toward
activity for purposes of the activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
40. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes the following bid
removal procedures. Before the close of a bidding round, a bidder has
the option of removing any bid placed in that round. By removing
selected bids in the FCC Auction System, a bidder may effectively
unsubmit any bid placed within that round. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder removing a bid placed in the same round
is not subject to a withdrawal payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
may no longer remove a bid.
41. A bidder may withdraw its provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning bid(s) is subject to the bid
withdrawal payment provisions of the Commission rules. The Bureau seeks
comment on these bid removal and bid withdrawal procedures.
42. The Bureau proposes to limit each bidder to withdrawing
provisionally winning bids in no more than two rounds during the course
of the auction. The two rounds in which withdrawals may be used will be
at the bidder's discretion; withdrawals otherwise must be in accordance
with the Commission's rules. There is no limit on the number of
provisionally winning bids that may be withdrawn in either of the
rounds in which withdrawals are used. Withdrawals will remain subject
to the bid withdrawal payment provisions specified in the Commission's
rules.
C. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal Payment Percentage
43. The Bureau seeks comment on the appropriate percentage of a
withdrawn bid that should be assessed as an interim withdrawal payment,
in the event that a final withdrawal payment cannot be determined at
the close of the auction. In general, the Commission's rules provide
that a bidder that withdraws a bid during an auction is subject to a
withdrawal payment equal to the difference between the amount of the
withdrawn bid and the amount of the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). However, if a license for which there has been a
withdrawn bid is neither subject to a subsequent higher bid nor won in
the same auction, the final withdrawal payment cannot be calculated
until a corresponding license is subject to a higher bid or won in a
subsequent auction. When that final payment cannot yet be calculated,
the bidder responsible for the withdrawn bid is assessed an interim bid
withdrawal payment, which will be applied toward any final bid
withdrawal payment that is ultimately assessed. The Commission recently
amended its rules to provide that in advance of the auction, the
Commission shall establish the percentage of the withdrawn bid to be
assessed as an interim bid withdrawal payment between three percent and
twenty percent.
44. The Commission has indicated that the level of the interim
withdrawal payment in a particular auction will be based on the nature
of the service and the inventory of the licenses being offered.
Balancing the potential need for bidders to use withdrawals to avoid
winning incomplete combinations of licenses with interest in deterring
abuses of its bidding, the Bureau proposes a percentage below the
[[Page 69130]]
maximum twenty percent permitted under the current rules but above the
three percent previously provided by the Commission's rules.
Specifically, the Bureau proposes to establish the percentage of the
withdrawn bid to be assessed as an interim bid withdrawal payment at
fifteen percent for this auction. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default Payment Percentage
45. Any winning bidder that defaults or is disqualified after the
close of an auction (i.e., fails to remit the required down payment
within the prescribed period of time, fails to submit a timely long-
form application, fails to make full payment, or is otherwise
disqualified) is liable for a default payment under 47 CFR
1.2104(g)(2). This payment consists of a deficiency payment, equal to
the difference between the amount of the bidder's bid and the amount of
the winning bid the next time a license covering the same spectrum is
won in an auction, plus an additional payment equal to a percentage of
the defaulter's bid or of the subsequent winning bid, whichever is
less. Until recently this additional payment for non-combinatorial
auctions has been set at three percent of the defaulter's bid or of the
subsequent winning bid, whichever is less.
46. The CSEA/Part 1 Report and Order, 71 FR 6214, February 7, 2006,
modified Sec. 1.2104(g)(2) by, inter alia, increasing the three
percent limit on the additional default payment for non-combinatorial
auctions to twenty percent. Under the modified rule, the Commission
will, in advance of each non-combinatorial auction, establish an
additional default payment for that auction of three percent up to a
maximum of twenty percent. As the Commission has indicated, the level
of this payment in each case will be based on the nature of the service
and the inventory of the licenses being offered.
47. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes to establish an
additional default payment of ten percent. Balancing these
considerations, the Bureau proposes an additional default payment of
ten percent of the relevant bid. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
IV. Conclusion
48. This proceeding has been designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance
of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings are set forth in Sec. 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. E6-20241 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P