Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1 Series Turboshaft Engines, 69083-69085 [E6-20229]
Download as PDF
69083
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 229
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Spinney, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781)
238–7175, fax (781) 238–7199; e-mail:
christopher.spinney@faa.gov.
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26091; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NE–28–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca
Arriel 1 Series Turboshaft Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start
electro valve fuel coupling were observed. A
lack of power or an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
The condition described in the MCAI
may result in a forced autorotation
landing, the inability to continue safe
flight or a fire. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 29,
2006.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:38 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to an address listed under the
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2006–26091; Directorate Identifier
2006-NE–28-AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the aviation authority
for the European Union, has issued
Airworthiness Directive No. 2006–0068,
dated March 24, 2006 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states that:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start
electro valve fuel coupling were observed. A
lack of power or an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
The condition described in the MCAI
may result in a forced autorotation
landing, the inability to continue safe
flight or a fire.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Turbomeca has issued Alert Service
Bulletin No. A292 73 0251, Update No.
2, dated February 5, 2001. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
69084
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
information provided by the State of
Design Authority and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the
same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the
proposed AD. These requirements, if
ultimately adopted, will take
precedence over the actions copied from
the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 790 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1.5 work-hours per product
to comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $6,000
per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $4,834,800, or
$6,120 per product.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
13:38 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
TURBOMECA: Docket No. FAA–2006–
26091; Directorate Identifier 2006–NE–
28–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 29, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Reason
(d) European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD No. 2006–0068, dated March 24,
2006, states:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start
electro valve fuel coupling were observed. A
Frm 00002
The condition described in the EASA
AD may result in a forced autorotation
landing, the inability to continue safe
flight or a fire.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Within 90 days after the effective
date of this AD, unless already done, do
the following actions:
(1) Check the condition of the three
fuel unions and the ignition solenoid
valve/start drain valve assembly, and
check for their proper assembly.
(2) Correct the installations if
necessary.
(3) Use Turbomeca Alert Service
Bulletin No. A292 73 0251, Update No.
2, dated February 5, 2001, to do the
checks and corrections.
AD Differences
(f) None.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also
apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of
Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer
or other source, use these actions if they
are FAA-approved. Corrective actions
are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design
Authority (or their delegated agent). You
are required to assure the product is
airworthy before it is returned to
service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–
0056.
Related Information
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Turbomeca Arriel
–1A, –1A1, –1A2, –1B, –1B2, –1C, –1C1,
–1C2, –1D, –1D, –1D1, –1K1, –1E, –1E2, –1S,
and –1S1 series turboshaft engines.
PO 00000
lack of power or an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(h) Contact Christopher Spinney,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (781) 238–7175, fax (781)
238–7199; e-mail:
christopher.spinney@faa.gov for more
information about this AD.
(i) Refer to EASA AD No. 2006–0068,
dated March 24, 2006, for related
information.
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 21, 2006.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20229 Filed 11–28–06; 8:45 am]
Public Notice
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[CB Docket No. 06–208]
Released: November 22, 2006.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Chapter I
[DA 06–1863]
Possible Revision or Elimination of
Rules
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Review of regulations under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980;
comments requested.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document invites
members of the public to comment on
the Federal Communication
Commission’s (FCC’s or Commission’s)
rules to be reviewed pursuant to section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, as amended (RFA). The purpose
of the review is to determine whether
Commission rules whose ten-year
anniversary dates are in the year 2006,
as contained in the Appendix, should be
continued without change, amended, or
rescinded in order to minimize any
significant impact the rules may have on
a substantial number of small entities.
Upon receipt of comments from the
public, the Commission will evaluate
those comments and consider whether
action should be taken to rescind or
amend the relevant rule(s).
DATES: Comments may be filed on or
before January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Communications Business
Opportunities (OCBO), Federal
Communications Commission, 202–
418–0990. People with disabilities may
contact the FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each year
the Commission will publish a list of
ten-year old rules for review and
comment by interested parties pursuant
to the requirements of section 610 of the
RFA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:38 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
FCC Seeks Comment Regarding Possible
Revision or Elimination of Rules Under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
610
1. Pursuant to the RFA, see 5 U.S.C.
section 610, the FCC hereby publishes a
plan for the review of rules adopted by
the agency in calendar year 1996 which
have, or might have, a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The purpose of
the review is to determine whether such
rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or
rescinded, consistent with the stated
objectives of section 610 of the RFA, to
minimize any significant economic
impact of such rules upon a substantial
number of small entities.
2. This document lists the FCC
regulations to be reviewed during the
next twelve months. In succeeding
years, as here, the Commission will
publish a list for the review of
regulations promulgated ten years
preceding the year of review.
3. In reviewing each rule under this
plan to minimize the possible
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
consistent with the requirements of
section 610, the FCC will consider the
following factors:
(a) The continued need for the rule;
(b) the nature of complaints or
comments received concerning the rule
from the public;
(c) the complexity of the rule;
(d) the extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with
other Federal rules and, to the extent
feasible, with State and local
governmental rules; and
(e) the length of time since the rule
has been evaluated or the degree to
which technology, economic conditions,
or other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule.
4. Appropriate information has been
provided for each rule, including a brief
description of the rule and the need for
and legal basis of the rule. The public
is invited to comment on the rules
chosen for review by the FCC according
to the requirements of section 610 of the
RFA. All relevant and timely comments
will be considered by the FCC before
final action is taken in this proceeding.
Comments may be filed using the
Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (‘‘ECFS’’) or by filing
paper copies. Comments filed through
the ECFS may be sent as an electronic
file via the Internet to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69085
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Generally, only
one copy of an electronic submission
must be filed. In completing the
transmittal screen, commenters should
include their full name, U.S. Postal
Service mailing address, and the
applicable docket or rulemaking
number.
Parties may also submit an electronic
comment by Internet e-mail. To obtain
filing instructions for e-mail comments,
commenters should send an e-mail to
ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the
following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in reply. Parties
who choose to file by paper must file an
original and four copies of each filing.
If more than one docket or rulemaking
number appears in the caption of this
proceeding, commenters must submit
two additional copies for each
additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). The Commission’s contractor,
Natek, Inc., will receive hand-delivered
or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002.
The filing hours at this location are 8
a.m. to 7 p.m.
• All hand deliveries must be held
together with rubber bands or fasteners.
• Any envelopes must be disposed of
before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class mail,
Express Mail, and Priority Mail should
be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
• All filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
Comments in this proceeding will be
available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours
at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC,
20554. They may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202–
488–5300 or 800–378–3160, facsimile
202–488–5563, or via e-mail at
fcc@bcniweb.com. To request materials
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69083-69085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20229]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 69083]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26091; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-28-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1 Series Turboshaft
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start electro valve
fuel coupling were observed. A lack of power or an uncommanded in-
flight shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
The condition described in the MCAI may result in a forced
autorotation landing, the inability to continue safe flight or a fire.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 29,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Spinney, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (781) 238-7175, fax (781) 238-7199; e-mail:
christopher.spinney@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This proposed AD references the MCAI and related service
information that we considered in forming the engineering basis to
correct the unsafe condition. The proposed AD contains text copied from
the MCAI and for this reason might not follow our plain language
principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-
26091; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-28-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the aviation
authority for the European Union, has issued Airworthiness Directive
No. 2006-0068, dated March 24, 2006 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states that:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start electro valve
fuel coupling were observed. A lack of power or an uncommanded in-
flight shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
The condition described in the MCAI may result in a forced
autorotation landing, the inability to continue safe flight or a fire.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Turbomeca has issued Alert Service Bulletin No. A292 73 0251,
Update No. 2, dated February 5, 2001. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all
[[Page 69084]]
information provided by the State of Design Authority and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the proposed AD. These
requirements, if ultimately adopted, will take precedence over the
actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 790 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1.5 work-hours per product to comply with this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $6,000 per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$4,834,800, or $6,120 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
TURBOMECA: Docket No. FAA-2006-26091; Directorate Identifier 2006-
NE-28-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 29, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Turbomeca Arriel -1A, -1A1, -1A2, -1B, -
1B2, -1C, -1C1, -1C2, -1D, -1D, -1D1, -1K1, -1E, -1E2, -1S, and -1S1
series turboshaft engines.
Reason
(d) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2006-0068,
dated March 24, 2006, states:
In operation, fuel leaks at the level of start electro valve
fuel coupling were observed. A lack of power or an uncommanded in-
flight shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
The condition described in the EASA AD may result in a forced
autorotation landing, the inability to continue safe flight or a fire.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done, do the following actions:
(1) Check the condition of the three fuel unions and the ignition
solenoid valve/start drain valve assembly, and check for their proper
assembly.
(2) Correct the installations if necessary.
(3) Use Turbomeca Alert Service Bulletin No. A292 73 0251, Update
No. 2, dated February 5, 2001, to do the checks and corrections.
AD Differences
(f) None.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Engine
Certification Office, FAA has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or
their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is
airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this
AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number
2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Contact Christopher Spinney, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781) 238-7175,
fax (781) 238-7199; e-mail: christopher.spinney@faa.gov for more
information about this AD.
(i) Refer to EASA AD No. 2006-0068, dated March 24, 2006, for
related information.
[[Page 69085]]
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 21, 2006.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6-20229 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P