U.S. EPA's National Clean Water Act Recognition Awards Presentation During the Water Environment Federation's Technical Exposition and Conference (WEFTEC), and Announcement of 2006 National Awards Winners, 67577-67579 [E6-19750]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Dated: November 9, 2006.
Donald L. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–19578 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
consider to be CBI or otherwise
AGENCY
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov
[Docket# EPA–RO4–SFUND–2006–0908;
Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
FRL–8245–9]
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
General Electric Rome Site, Rome,
Floyd County, GA; Notice of Proposed information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
Settlement
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
going through www.regulations.gov
Agency (EPA).
your e-mail address will be
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the
public docket and made available on the
Comprehensive Environmental
Internet. If you submit an electronic
Response, Compensation and Liability
comment, EPA recommends that you
Act (CERCLA), the United States
include your name and other contact
Environmental Protection Agency is
information in the body of your
proposing to enter into a settlement for
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
reimbursement of past response costs
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
concerning the General Electric Rome
comment due to technical difficulties
Site located in Rome, Floyd County,
and cannot contact you for clarification,
Georgia.
EPA may not be able to consider your
DATES: The Agency will consider public
comment. Electronic files should avoid
comments on the settlement until
the use of special characters, any form
December 22, 2006. The Agency will
of encryption, and be free of any defects
consider all comments received and
or viruses. For additional information
may modify or withdraw its consent to
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
the settlement if comments received
Docket Center homepage at https://
disclose facts or considerations which
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
indicate that the settlement is
Docket: All documents in the docket
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. are listed in the www.regulations.gov
ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are
index. Although listed in the index,
available from Ms. Paula V. Batchelor.
some information is not publicly
Submit your comments, identified by
available, e.g., CBI or other information
Docket ID No. EPA–RO4–SFUND–2006– whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
0908 or Site name General Electric
Certain other material, such as
Rome Superfund Site by one of the
copyrighted material, will be publicly
following methods:
available only in hard copy. Publicly
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow available docket materials are available
the on-line instructions for submitting
either electronically in https://
comments.
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
• E-mail: Batchelor.Paula@epa.gov.
the U.S. EPA Region 4 office located at
• Fax: 404/562–8842/Attn Paula V.
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
Batchelor.
30303. Regional office is open from 7
• Mail: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.
a.m. until 6:30 p.m. Monday through
EPA Region 4, WMD–SEIMB, 61 Forsyth Friday, excluding legal holidays.
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ‘‘In
Written comments may be submitted
addition, please mail a copy of your
to Ms. Batchelor within 30 calendar
comments on the information collection
days of the date of this publication.
provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Management and Budget (OMB), Attn:
Paula V. Batchelor at 404/562–8887.
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St. NW.,
Dated: October 30, 2006.
Washington, DC 20503.’’
Rosalind H. Brown,
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–RO4–SFUND–2006– Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information
0908. EPA’s policy is that all comments Management Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. E6–19758 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67577
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[OW–2006–0064, FRL–8246–5]
U.S. EPA’s National Clean Water Act
Recognition Awards Presentation
During the Water Environment
Federation’s Technical Exposition and
Conference (WEFTEC), and
Announcement of 2006 National
Awards Winners
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency recognized municipalities and
industries for outstanding and
innovative technological achievements
in wastewater treatment and pollution
abatement programs. An inscribed
plaque was presented to first and
second place national winners at the
annual Clean Water Act Recognition
Awards presentation during the Water
Environment Federation’s Technical
Exposition and Conference (WEFTEC).
Recognition is made every year for
outstanding programs and projects in
operations and maintenance at
wastewater treatment facilities,
biosolids management and public
acceptance, municipal implementation
and enforcement of local pretreatment
programs, cost-effective storm water
controls, and combined sewer overflow
controls. This action also announces the
2006 national awards winners.
DATES: Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:30
a.m. to 1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The national awards
presentation ceremony was held at the
Dallas Convention Center, 650 S. Griffin
Street, Dallas, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria E. Campbell, Telephone: (202)
564–0628. Facsimile Number: (202)
501–2396. E-Mail:
campbell.maria@epa.gov. Also visit the
Office of Wastewater Management’s
webpage at https://www.epa.gov/owm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean
Water Act Recognition Awards are
authorized by section 501(a) and (e) of
the Clean Water Act, and 33 U.S.C.
1361(a) and (e). Applications and
nominations for the national awards are
recommended by EPA regions. A
regulation establishes a framework for
the annual recognition awards program
at 40 CFR part 105. EPA announced the
availability of application and
nomination information for this year’s
awards (71 FR 23919, April 25, 2006).
The awards program enhances national
awareness of municipal wastewater
treatment and encourages public
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
67578
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
support of programs targeted to
protecting the public’s health and safety
and the nation’s water quality. State
water pollution control agencies and
EPA regional offices make
recommendations to headquarters for
the national awards. Programs and
projects being recognized are in
compliance with applicable water
quality requirements and have a
satisfactory record with respect to
environmental quality. Municipalities
and industries are recognized for their
demonstrated creativity and
technological achievements in five
awards categories as follows:
(1) Outstanding Operations and
Maintenance practices at wastewater
treatment facilities;
(2) Exemplary Biosolids Management
projects, technology/innovation or
development activities, research and
public acceptance efforts;
(3) Pretreatment Program Excellence;
(4) Storm Water Management
Excellence; and,
(5) Outstanding Combined Sewer
Overflow Control programs. The
winners of the EPA’s 2006 National
Clean Water Act Recognition Awards
are listed below by category.
Sub-category
Category: Operations and Maintenance Awards
First Place:
Clean Water Services, Rock Creek Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility, Hillsboro, OR ....................
Watertown Wastewater Treatment Facility, Watertown, SD ..........................................................................
Town of Castleton Wastewater Treatment Facility, Castleton, VT ................................................................
Franklin Wastewater Treatment Facility, Winnipesaukee River Basin Program, Franklin, NH .....................
Huron Wastewater Treatment Facility, Huron, SD .........................................................................................
Town of Wanatah Wastewater Treatment Facility, Wanatah, IN ...................................................................
Sturgis Wastewater Treatment Facility, Sturgis, SD ......................................................................................
Warner Village Water District, Warner, NH ....................................................................................................
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Wastewater Engineering Bureau/Operations
Section, Concord, New Hampshire.
Second Place:
Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Facility, Englewood, CO ...........................................................
The Pequannock Lincoln Park & Fairfield Sewerage Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant, Lincoln Park,
NJ.
Hurlburt Field Wastewater Treatment Facility, Hurlburt Field Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, FL ..........
Northern Water Pollution Control Facility—Ocean County Utilities Authority, Brick Township, NJ ..............
Portage Lake Water and Sewage Authority, Houghton-Hancock Wastewater Treatment Plant, Houghton,
MI.
City of Natoma Wastewater Treatment Facility, Natoma, KS ........................................................................
Gerald Grant, P.E., Fort Scott Community College, Fort Scott, KS ..............................................................
Large Advanced Plant.
Medium Advanced Plant.
Small Advanced Plant.
Large Secondary Plant.
Medium Secondary Plant.
Small Secondary Plant.
Large Non-Discharging Plant.
Most Improved Plant.
Trainer for the Most Improved
Plant.
Large Advanced Plant.
Medium Advanced Plant.
Small Advanced Plant.
Large Secondary Plant.
Medium Secondary Plant.
Most Improved Plant.
Trainer for the Most Improved
Plant.
Category: Exemplary Biosolids Management Awards
First Place:
Encina Wastewater Authority, Biosolids Management Program, Carlsbad, CA ............................................
City of Olathe Compost Facility, Olathe, KS ..................................................................................................
Florida Water Environment Association and the Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Agency/Central District, Orlando, FL.
Second Place:
Rancho Las Virgenes Composting Facility, Community Compost Program, Calabasas, CA .......................
Large Operating Projects.
Small Operating Projects.
Public Acceptance Activities.
Public Acceptance Activities.
Category: Pretreatment Program Awards
First Place:
City of Corvallis Pretreatment Program, Corvallis, OR ..................................................................................
Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant, Environmental Compliance Section, City of Riverside,
CA.
City of Fresno Industrial Pretreatment Program, Fresno, CA ........................................................................
Second Place:
City of San Leandro, San Leandro, CA .........................................................................................................
0–5 Significant Industrial Users
(SIUs).
6–20 SIUs.
Greater Than 21 SIUs.
6–20 SIUs.
Category: Storm Water Management Awards
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
First Place:
Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, San Jose, CA ..........................................
Municipal Program.
Category: Combined Sewer Overflow Control Awards
First Place:
Auburn Sewerage District, Auburn, ME .........................................................................................................
Second Place:
City of Little Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant, Little Falls NY ....................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
Municipal Program.
Municipal Program.
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
Dated: November 16, 2006.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E6–19750 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8245–3]
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the State of
Texas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the State of Texas is revising its
approved Public Water System
Supervision Program. Texas has
adopted the Lead and Copper Rule
Minor Revisions (LCRMR), the Filter
Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), and
the Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR).
EPA has determined that the proposed
LCRMR, FBRR and LT1ESWTR
revisions submitted by Texas are no less
stringent than the corresponding federal
regulation. Therefore, EPA intends to
approve the program revisions.
DATES: All interested parties may
request a public hearing. A request for
a public hearing must be submitted by
December 22, 2006 to the Regional
Administrator at the EPA Region 6
address shown below. Frivolous or
insubstantial requests for a hearing may
be denied by the Regional
Administrator. However, if a substantial
request for a public hearing is made by
December 22, 2006, a public hearing
will be held. If no timely and
appropriate request for a hearing is
received and the Regional Administrator
does not elect to hold a hearing on his
own motion, this determination shall
become final and effective on December
22, 2006. Any request for a public
hearing shall include the following
information: The name, address, and
telephone number of the individual,
organization, or other entity requesting
a hearing; a brief statement of the
requesting person’s interest in the
Regional Administrator’s determination
and a brief statement of the information
that the requesting person intends to
submit at such hearing; and the
signature of the individual making the
request, or, if the request is made on
behalf of an organization or other entity,
the signature of a responsible official of
the organization or other entity.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
All documents relating to
this determination are available for
inspection between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
at the following offices: Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality,
Water Supply Division, Public Drinking
Water Section (MC–155), Building F,
12100 Park 35 Circle, Austin, TX 78753;
and United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6, Drinking
Water Section (6WQ–SD), 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damon McElroy, EPA Region 6,
Drinking Water Section at the Dallas
address given above or at telephone
(214) 665–7159, or
mcelroy.damon@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act, as amended (1996), and
40 CFR part 142 of the National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator (6RA–D).
[FR Doc. E6–19784 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
November 13, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67579
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 22,
2006. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) comments to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
B441, 445 12th Street, SW., DC 20554 or
via the Internet to PRA@fcc.gov. If you
would like to obtain or view a copy of
this information collection, you may do
so by visiting the FCC PRA Web page at:
https://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), send an e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B.
Herman at 202–418–0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–XXXX.
Title: Prepaid Calling Card Service
Provider Certification, WC Docket No.
05–68.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: New collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 787
respondents; 3,148 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 25
hours (20 hours for the reporting to
carriers and five hours for the
certification to the Commission).
Frequency of Response: Quarterly
reporting requirement, recordkeeping
requirement and third party disclosure
requirement.
Nature of Response: Mandatory.
Total Annual Burden: 3,148 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as a new collection to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in order to obtain the full three
year clearance.
The Commission is requesting review
and approval of a new information
collection requiring prepaid calling card
providers to report quarterly the
percentage of interstate, intrastate and
international traffic and call volumes to
carriers from which they purchase
transport services. Prepaid calling card
providers must also file quarterly
certifications with the Commission that
include the above information and a
statement that they are contributing to
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67577-67579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19750]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OW-2006-0064, FRL-8246-5]
U.S. EPA's National Clean Water Act Recognition Awards
Presentation During the Water Environment Federation's Technical
Exposition and Conference (WEFTEC), and Announcement of 2006 National
Awards Winners
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency recognized municipalities
and industries for outstanding and innovative technological
achievements in wastewater treatment and pollution abatement programs.
An inscribed plaque was presented to first and second place national
winners at the annual Clean Water Act Recognition Awards presentation
during the Water Environment Federation's Technical Exposition and
Conference (WEFTEC). Recognition is made every year for outstanding
programs and projects in operations and maintenance at wastewater
treatment facilities, biosolids management and public acceptance,
municipal implementation and enforcement of local pretreatment
programs, cost-effective storm water controls, and combined sewer
overflow controls. This action also announces the 2006 national awards
winners.
DATES: Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The national awards presentation ceremony was held at the
Dallas Convention Center, 650 S. Griffin Street, Dallas, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria E. Campbell, Telephone: (202)
564-0628. Facsimile Number: (202) 501-2396. E-Mail:
campbell.maria@epa.gov. Also visit the Office of Wastewater
Management's webpage at https://www.epa.gov/owm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Water Act Recognition Awards are
authorized by section 501(a) and (e) of the Clean Water Act, and 33
U.S.C. 1361(a) and (e). Applications and nominations for the national
awards are recommended by EPA regions. A regulation establishes a
framework for the annual recognition awards program at 40 CFR part 105.
EPA announced the availability of application and nomination
information for this year's awards (71 FR 23919, April 25, 2006). The
awards program enhances national awareness of municipal wastewater
treatment and encourages public
[[Page 67578]]
support of programs targeted to protecting the public's health and
safety and the nation's water quality. State water pollution control
agencies and EPA regional offices make recommendations to headquarters
for the national awards. Programs and projects being recognized are in
compliance with applicable water quality requirements and have a
satisfactory record with respect to environmental quality.
Municipalities and industries are recognized for their demonstrated
creativity and technological achievements in five awards categories as
follows:
(1) Outstanding Operations and Maintenance practices at wastewater
treatment facilities;
(2) Exemplary Biosolids Management projects, technology/innovation
or development activities, research and public acceptance efforts;
(3) Pretreatment Program Excellence;
(4) Storm Water Management Excellence; and,
(5) Outstanding Combined Sewer Overflow Control programs. The
winners of the EPA's 2006 National Clean Water Act Recognition Awards
are listed below by category.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub-category
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category: Operations and
Maintenance Awards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Place:
Clean Water Services, Large Advanced Plant.
Rock Creek Advanced
Wastewater Treatment
Facility, Hillsboro, OR.
Watertown Wastewater Medium Advanced Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Watertown, SD.
Town of Castleton Small Advanced Plant.
Wastewater Treatment
Facility, Castleton, VT.
Franklin Wastewater Large Secondary Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Winnipesaukee River
Basin Program, Franklin,
NH.
Huron Wastewater Medium Secondary Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Huron, SD.
Town of Wanatah Small Secondary Plant.
Wastewater Treatment
Facility, Wanatah, IN.
Sturgis Wastewater Large Non-Discharging Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Sturgis, SD.
Warner Village Water Most Improved Plant.
District, Warner, NH.
New Hampshire Department Trainer for the Most Improved Plant.
of Environmental
Services, Wastewater
Engineering Bureau/
Operations Section,
Concord, New Hampshire.
Second Place:
Littleton/Englewood Large Advanced Plant.
Wastewater Treatment
Facility, Englewood, CO.
The Pequannock Lincoln Medium Advanced Plant.
Park & Fairfield
Sewerage Authority
Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Lincoln Park, NJ.
Hurlburt Field Wastewater Small Advanced Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Hurlburt Field Air Force
Base, Okaloosa County,
FL.
Northern Water Pollution Large Secondary Plant.
Control Facility--Ocean
County Utilities
Authority, Brick
Township, NJ.
Portage Lake Water and Medium Secondary Plant.
Sewage Authority,
Houghton-Hancock
Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Houghton, MI.
City of Natoma Wastewater Most Improved Plant.
Treatment Facility,
Natoma, KS.
Gerald Grant, P.E., Fort Trainer for the Most Improved Plant.
Scott Community College,
Fort Scott, KS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category: Exemplary Biosolids
Management Awards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Place:
Encina Wastewater Large Operating Projects.
Authority, Biosolids
Management Program,
Carlsbad, CA.
City of Olathe Compost Small Operating Projects.
Facility, Olathe, KS.
Florida Water Environment Public Acceptance Activities.
Association and the
Florida Dept. of
Environmental Protection
Agency/Central District,
Orlando, FL.
Second Place:
Rancho Las Virgenes Public Acceptance Activities.
Composting Facility,
Community Compost
Program, Calabasas, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category: Pretreatment
Program Awards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Place:
City of Corvallis 0-5 Significant Industrial Users (SIUs).
Pretreatment Program,
Corvallis, OR.
Riverside Regional Water 6-20 SIUs.
Quality Control Plant,
Environmental Compliance
Section, City of
Riverside, CA.
City of Fresno Industrial Greater Than 21 SIUs.
Pretreatment Program,
Fresno, CA.
Second Place:
City of San Leandro, San 6-20 SIUs.
Leandro, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category: Storm Water
Management Awards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Place:
Santa Clara Valley Urban Municipal Program.
Runoff Pollution
Prevention Program, San
Jose, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category: Combined Sewer
Overflow Control Awards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Place:
Auburn Sewerage District, Municipal Program.
Auburn, ME.
Second Place:
City of Little Falls Municipal Program.
Wastewater Treatment
Plant, Little Falls NY.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 67579]]
Dated: November 16, 2006.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E6-19750 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
