Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request, 67630-67633 [E6-19687]
Download as PDF
67630
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
refuge would also construct a fishing
pier on the bayou and a canoe and
kayak trail with access point. Staff
would investigate opportunities for
limited hunting possibilities.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: October 11, 2006.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06–9343 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submitted for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of revision of an
information collection (1010–0154).
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), MMS is notifying the public that
it has submitted to OMB an information
collection request (ICR) to renew
approval of the paperwork requirements
under the Endangered Species Act
Biological Opinions, issued by the Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Fisheries (NOAA
Fisheries) and are titled: ‘‘Notices to
Lessees and Operators (NTLs)—
Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program; Vessel Strike
Avoidance and Injured/Dead Protected
Species Reporting; and, Marine Trash
and Debris Awareness and
Elimination.’’ This notice also provides
the public a second opportunity to
comment on the paperwork burden of
these regulatory requirements.
DATES: Submit written comments by
December 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this information collection directly
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of the
Interior via OMB e-mail:
(OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by
fax (202) 395–6566; identify with (1010–
0154).
Submit a copy of your comments to
the Department of the Interior, MMS,
via:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
• Public Connect on-line commenting
system, https://ocsconnect.mms.gov.
Follow the instructions on the website
for submitting comments.
• E-mail MMS at
rules.comments@mms.gov. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010–
0154 in the subject line.
• Fax: 703–787–1093. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010–
0154.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention: Rules
Processing Team (RPT); 381 Elden
Street, MS–4024; Herndon, Virginia
20170–4817. Please reference
‘‘Information Collection 1010–0154’’ in
your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Blundon, Regulations and
Standards Branch, (703) 787–1607. You
may also contact Cheryl Blundon to
obtain a copy, at no cost, of the NTLs
that require the subject collection of
information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Notices to Lessees and
Operators (NTLs)—Implementation of
Seismic Survey Mitigation Measures
and Protected Species Observer
Program; Vessel Strike Avoidance and
Injured/Dead Protected Species
Reporting; and, Marine Trash and
Debris Awareness and Elimination.
OMB Control Number: 1010–0154.
Abstract: The Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Lands Act, as amended (43 U.S.C.
1331 et seq. and 43 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.),
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior
to prescribe rules and regulations to
administer leasing of the OCS. Such
rules and regulations will apply to all
operations conducted under a lease.
Operations on the OCS must preserve,
protect, and develop oil and natural gas
resources in a manner that is consistent
with the need to make such resources
available to meet the Nation’s energy
needs as rapidly as possible; to balance
orderly energy resource development
with protection of human, marine, and
coastal environments; to ensure the
public a fair and equitable return on the
resources of the OCS; and to preserve
and maintain free enterprise
competition.
As a Federal agency, we have a
continuing affirmative duty to comply
with the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
This includes a substantive duty to
carry out any agency action in a manner
that is not likely to jeopardize protected
species as well as a procedural duty to
consult with the FWS and NOAA
Fisheries before engaging in a
discretionary action that may affect a
protected species.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The MMS follows these procedural
requirements by conducting formal
consultations with FWS and NOAA
Fisheries prior to lease sales.
Consultations on OCS lease sales 181,
184, and the 5-year multisale (2002–
2007) program in the Central and
Western Planning Areas of the Gulf of
Mexico (GOM) resulted in no-jeopardy
biological opinions from the FWS and
NOAA Fisheries. In their biological
opinions, NOAA Fisheries determined
that some activities associated with the
proposed action (lease sale and related
exploration, development, and
production activities) may adversely
affect (harm) sperm whales and sea
turtles in the action area and that certain
reasonable and prudent measures are
necessary to minimize the potential for
incidental take of these animals. To be
exempt from the prohibitions of Section
9 of the ESA (which prohibits taking
listed species), MMS must implement
and enforce nondiscretionary terms and
conditions. The ESA also requires
monitoring and reporting. Monitoring
programs resulting from ESA
interagency consultations are designed
to (1) detect adverse effects resulting
from a proposed action, (2) assess the
actual level of incidental take in
comparison with the level of anticipated
incidental take documented in the
biological opinion, (3) detect when the
level of anticipated take is exceeded,
and (4) determine the effectiveness of
reasonable and prudent alternatives and
their implementing terms and
conditions.
To provide supplementary guidance
and procedures, MMS issues Notices to
Lessees and Operators (NTLs) on a
regional or national basis. Regulation 30
CFR 250.103 allows MMS to issue NTLs
to clarify, supplement, or provide more
detail about certain requirements. To
implement the nondiscretionary terms
and conditions of these biological
opinions, the MMS issued three NTLs,
as follows (note that the NTL numbers
were removed since they will be
reissued after renewal):
• Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program,
• Vessel Strike Avoidance and
Injured/Dead Protected Species
Reporting,
• Marine Trash and Debris Awareness
and Elimination.
It should be noted that it has now
become common practice for OCS
lessees and operators to subcontract the
marine mammal observation and
monitoring activities associated with the
requirements of the Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program NTL.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
MMS has been working on
rulemaking, 1010–AD10, to incorporate
the requirements in the NTLs into our
regulations. Once final rulemaking
becomes effective, the burden hours for
this collection will be consolidated into
the primary collection of 30 CFR part
250 subpart B, 1010–0151. We will then
submit to OMB a request to discontinue
this collection.
MMS will use the information
collected to report annually to NOAA
Fisheries the effectiveness of mitigation,
any adverse effects of the proposed
action, and any incidental take, in
accordance with 50 CFR 402.14(i)(3).
MMS engineers, geologists,
geophysicists, environmental scientists,
and other federal agencies (FWS, NOAA
Fisheries, etc.) also will analyze the
information and data collected under
these NTLs to better evaluate the
potential impacts to listed species and
to plan operations in a manner that will
further reduce and/or avoid adverse
impacts to protected species on the
OCS.
We will protect information from
respondents considered proprietary
under the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S.C. 552) and its implementing
regulations (43 CFR Part 2). No items of
a sensitive nature are collected.
Responses are mandatory.
Frequency: On occasion, annually,
and on the 1st and 15th of each month
NTL title
Reporting, posting, or recordkeeping
requirement
Implementation of Seismic Survey Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer Program.
Submit to MMS observer training requirement materials and information.
for the marine mammal observation
reports.
Estimated Number and Description of
Respondents: Approximately 130
Federal OCS lessees and operators.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: The
estimated annual ‘‘hour’’ burden for this
information collection is a total of 1,002
hours. The following chart details the
individual components and estimated
hour burdens. In calculating the
burdens, MMS assumed that
respondents perform certain
requirements in the normal course of
their activities. MMS considers these to
be usual and customary and took that
into account in estimating the burden.
12
Training certification and recordkeeping
67631
Hour burden
Average No. of annual responses
Annual burden
hours
⁄ hour ..................
24 reports × 4 vessels = 96.
48
12
⁄ hour ..................
20 .............................
10
If used, submit to MMS information on
any passive acoustic monitoring system prior to placing it in service.
1 hour ....................
3 ...............................
3
Submit to MMS marine mammal observation report(s). (This includes observer duty and training and are the
occasional activities done in-house
and not subcontracted out.).
345 hours* .............
2 reports ..................
690
Vessel Strike Avoidance and Injured/
Dead Protected Species Reporting.
Submit injured/dead protected species
report.
12
⁄ hour ..................
2 reports ..................
1
Marine Trash and Debris Awareness
and Elimination.
Submit request for training video ..........
12
⁄ hour ..................
100 requests ............
50
Submit annual report to MMS on training process and certification.
12
⁄ hour ..................
200 records .............
100
Training recordkeeping .........................
12
⁄ hour ..................
200 records .............
100
Post placards on vessels and structures. (Exempt from information collection burden
because MMS is providing exact language for the trash and debris warning, similar
to the ‘‘Surgeon General’s Warning’’ exemption.)
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Total Hour Burden .......................................................................................................................................
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: We have identified three nonhour costs associated with this IC that
were originally estimated as hour
burdens. As previously explained,
typically these activities are now
subcontracted to other service
companies with expertise in these areas.
Therefore, in this submission we have
significantly reduced the corresponding
hours and put the majority of the costs
associated with these requirements in
the ‘‘non-hour cost’’ burden. To allow
for the potential in-house reporting by
lessees/operators, we have retained a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
minimal hour burden in the hour
burden table. It should be noted that the
costs identified are associated with the
NTL: Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program.
• Observer training—8 hrs @ $37.50
hr = $300 × 72 observers = $21,600.
• Submit observation report/form—1
hr @ $52 hr = $52 × 200 reports/forms
= $10,400.
• Observation duty—8 hrs × 3
observers = 24 × 4 vessels = 96 hrs × 365
days/yr = 35,040 hours × $52 hr =
$1,822,080.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
623 responses .........
0
1,002 hrs
Therefore, we estimate that the annual
non-hour cost burden is $1,854,080.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obligated to respond.
Comments: Before submitting an ICR
to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A)
requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide
notice * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
67632
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
collection of information * * *’’
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public
consultation process, on May 10, 2006,
we published a Federal Register notice
(71 FR 27268) announcing that we
would submit this ICR to OMB for
approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. In
addition, § 250.199 also informs the
public that they may comment at any
time on the collections of information
and provides the address to which they
should send comments. We received
several comments in response to these
efforts. The following discusses the
comments and MMS’s responses.
Comment A: We request that the MMS
demonstrate that the monitoring and
reporting requirements of NTL 2004G01, Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program, have in fact
been approved by OMB under the PRA.
Response A: As a means to implement
non-discretionary terms and conditions
imposed by NOAA in their July 2002
biological opinion for Lease Sale 184
and subsequent Endangered Species Act
section 7 consultations, MMS sought
emergency information collection (IC)
approval from OMB. OMB issued the
emergency IC approval (OMB Control
Number 1010–0154) on 3/26/2003, for
180 days with an expiration date of 9/
30/2003. MMS issued NTL 2003-G08
‘‘Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program’’ with an
effective date of 6/5/2003. MMS then
began the process of obtaining the
standard 3-year OMB IC approval for the
NTL. During that process, MMS
expanded the scope of the NTL to cover
additional marine mammals and water
depths less than 200 meters in the
Eastern Planning Area of the Gulf of
Mexico. OMB IC approval for the NTL
with revised scope was granted (1010–
0154) on 12/05/03. MMS reissued the
NTL (after the effective date of the OMB
IC approval) in 2004, with a 2004 NTL
number, NTL 2004-G01 (which means
the first NTL issued by the Gulf of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
Mexico Regional Office in the year
2004).
Comment B: We request that MMS
demonstrate that there are no costs to
comply with the monitoring and
reporting requirements of NTL 2004–
G01.
Response B: The initial standard IC
request for this NTL went out for public
comment with a 60-day (68 FR 25905
May 14, 2003) and 30-day (68 FR 56313
September 30, 2003) Federal Register
notice. In the standard IC request, MMS
states ‘‘* * * Agencies must also
estimate the ‘‘non-hour cost’’ burdens to
respondents or recordkeepers resulting
from the collection of information.
Therefore, if you have costs to generate,
maintain, and disclose this information,
you should comment and provide your
total capital and startup cost
components or annual operations,
maintenance, and purchase of service
components * * *’’ MMS did receive a
comment expressing concern about the
possible costs associated with these
NTLs. However, the commenter did not
identify any specific non-hour cost
estimates associated with the activities.
Therefore, in the 2003 submission to
OMB requesting a standard three-year
extension of the emergency approval,
MMS reported that we had not
identified any non-hour cost burdens
associated with the NTLs. OMB granted
the three-year approval with the current
December 31, 2006, expiration date.
During this current 2006 renewal
process, we again published the 60-day
comment notice in the Federal Register
(71 FR 27268, 5/10/2006). We received
the above comment pertaining to the
non-hour cost burdens. Based upon this
comment, and the previous 2003
comment expressing concern over the
costs associated with the requirements
imposed by these NTLs, MMS has
further investigated both the hour and
non-hour cost burdens. Our findings
revealed that lessees and operators now
routinely subcontract the marine
mammal observation and monitoring
activities detailed in one of the NTLs.
This results in ‘‘non-hour’’ cost burdens
($1,854,080) in the form of service
contracts, rather than in-house company
employees performing these duties with
corresponding ‘‘hour’’ burden costs.
Therefore, in this ICR we have adjusted
all of our estimates accordingly for both
the hour and non-hour cost burdens.
Comment C: We request that MMS
confirm our understanding that the
proposed extension of OMB No. 1010–
0154 indicates that MMS does not
intend or foresee any changes in the
NTL 2004–G01 monitoring, reporting,
and mitigation requirements. Any new
requirements would require a new ICR,
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
would require a new public comment
period, and would have to pass the
practical utility test.
Response C: After OMB renews this
collection, MMS will reissue NTL 2004–
G01 with no changes in requirements.
Should MMS need to impose new
requirements, MMS would seek OMB IC
approval and provide notice for public
comment. However, the NTL will be
reissued with a current year NTL
number (which will have either a 2006
or 2007 to signify the year that the NTL
was issued, and a different G number,
signifying the alphanumerical order of
an NTL) and will display the new OMB
approval expiration date and a revised
PRA paragraph to reflect the reestimated IC hour and non-hour cost
burdens.
Comment D: One commenter posed a
question concerning the validity of
observers and their qualifications.
Response D: This comment does not
pertain to the information collection
burden of the requirements. But, in
response, it should be noted that all
visual observers must have completed a
protected species observer training
course. MMS will not sanction
particular trainers or training programs.
Training is offered by independent
entities. However, basic training criteria
have been established and must be
adhered to by any entity that offers
observer training. Operators may utilize
observers trained by third parties, may
send crew for training conducted by
third parties, or may develop their own
training program. All training programs
offering to fulfill the observer training
requirement must: (1) Furnish to MMS,
at the address listed in the NTL titled,
Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected
Species Observer Program, a course
information packet that includes the
name and qualifications (i.e.,
experience, training completed, or
educational background) of the
instructor(s), the course outline or
syllabus, and course reference material;
(2) furnish each trainee with a
document stating successful completion
of the course; and (3) provide MMS with
names, affiliations, and dates of course
completion of trainees. The training
course must include the following
elements: overview of the MMPA and
the ESA as they relate to seismic
acquisition and protection of marine
mammals and sea turtles in the GOM;
overview of seismic acquisition
operations in the GOM; overview of
seismic mitigation measures (NTLs) and
the protected species observer program
in the GOM; discussion of the role and
responsibilities of the protected species
observer in the GOM, including the
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
legal requirements (why you are here
and what you do), professional behavior
(code of conduct), integrity, authority of
protected species observer to call for
shut-down of seismic acquisition
operations, assigned duties—what can/
cannot be asked of the observer,
reporting of violations and coercion;
identification of GOM marine mammals
and sea turtles, with emphasis on
whales; cues and search methods for
locating marine mammals, especially
whales, and sea turtles; data collection
and reporting requirements—forms and
reports to MMS on the 1st and 15th of
each month, whale in exclusion zone/
shut-down report within 24 hours.
If you wish to comment in response
to this notice, you may send your
comments to the offices listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. OMB
has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collection
but may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
public comments by December 22, 2006.
Public Comment Procedures: MMS’s
practice is to make comments, including
the names and addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their address
from the rulemaking record, which we
will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There may be circumstances in
which we would withhold from the
record a respondent’s identity, as
allowable by the law. If you wish us to
withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. In addition,
you must present a rationale for
withholding this information. This
rationale must demonstrate that
disclosure ‘‘would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy.’’
Unsupported assertions will not meet
this burden. In the absence of
exceptional, documentable
circumstances, this information will be
released. However, we will not consider
anonymous comments. Except for
proprietary information, we will make
all submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
MMS Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (202)
208–7744.
Dated: September 26, 2006.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–19687 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
67633
Web site at https://parkplanning.nps.gov.
Once on the PEPC Web site, select
National Park Service
‘‘Catoctin Mountain Park’’ in order to
access the DEIS. Bound copies of the
Notice of Availability of the Draft
DEIS will be available at the Catoctin
White-tailed Deer Management Plan
Mountain Park Visitor Center located at
Environmental Impact Statement,
the intersection of Maryland Route 77
Catoctin Mountain Park, MD
and Park Central Road, at park
headquarters located approximately 2
AGENCY: National Park Service,
miles west of Thurmont on Maryland
Department of the Interior.
Route 77, and at public libraries in
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Frederick, Thurmont, Smithsburg, and
Draft White-tailed Deer Management
Hagerstown, Maryland.
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
for Catoctin Mountain Park.
Donna Swauger, Environmental
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Protection Specialists, Catoctin
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the
Mountain Park, 6602 Foxville Road,
National Park Service (NPS) announces
Thurmont, Maryland 21788, (301) 416–
the availability of the Draft White-tailed 0135.
Deer Management Plan/Environmental
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DEIS
Impact Statement (DEIS) for Catoctin
evaluates four alternatives for managing
Mountain Park, Thurmont, Maryland.
white-tailed deer in the park. The
The purpose of the DEIS is to identify
document describes and analyzes the
a preferred white-tailed deer
environmental impacts of three action
management plan from a range of
alternatives and the no-action
alternatives that supports forest
alternative.
regeneration and provides for long-term
Alternative A (no action) would
protection, conservation, and restoration continue the existing deer management
of native species and cultural resources. plan of limited fencing, use of repellents
The DEIS evaluates four alternatives for in landscaped areas, monitoring, data
managing white-tailed deer in the park.
management, and research; no new deer
The document describes and analyzes
management actions would be
the environmental impacts of three
implemented.
action alternatives and the no-action
Alternative B would combine several
alternative. When implemented, the
non-lethal actions including large-scale
plan will guide deer management
exclosures (fencing), additional use of
actions over the next 15 years.
repellents in limited areas, and
DATES: The NPS invites comments
reproductive control of does to
regarding the DEIS from the public.
gradually reduce deer population in the
Comments will be accepted for a period park.
of 60 days from the date the
Under Alternative C (NPS Preferred
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Alternative), qualified federal
Notice of Availability is published in
employees or contractors would directly
the Federal Register. In addition, the
reduce the deer population in the park
NPS intends to conduct a public
through sharpshooting and capture and
meeting. Please check local newspapers, euthanasia, where appropriate.
the park’s Web site, https://www.nps.gov/
Alternative D would combine actions
cato, or contact the name listed below
of Alternative C to directly reduce the
to find out when and where the meeting deer population and reproductive
will be held. A brochure has been
control of does as under Alternative B
prepared that describes the DEIS and
to maintain population levels.
provides information regarding the
Comments will be analyzed and
public meeting.
responded to within the final WhiteThere are several ways to submit
tailed Deer Management Plan/
comments. During the public meeting,
Environmental Impact Statement. Our
the NPS will accept written comments
practice is to make comments, including
as well as provide for verbal comments
names, home addresses, home phone
to be recorded. We encourage comments numbers and e-mail addresses of
to be submitted electronically through
respondents, available for public
the NPS Planning, Environment, and
review. Individual respondents may
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site
request that we withhold their names
https://parkplanning.nps.gov. Written
and/or home addresses, etc., but if you
comments may also be submitted to:
wish us to consider withholding this
Superintendent, Catoctin Mountain
information you must state this
Park, 6602 Foxville Road, Thurmont,
prominently at the beginning of your
Maryland, 21788.
comments. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this
ADDRESSES: The DEIS will be available
information. This rationale must
for public review online at the PEPC
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67630-67633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19687]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of revision of an information collection (1010-0154).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), MMS
is notifying the public that it has submitted to OMB an information
collection request (ICR) to renew approval of the paperwork
requirements under the Endangered Species Act Biological Opinions,
issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA Fisheries) and are titled:
``Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs)--Implementation of Seismic
Survey Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer Program;
Vessel Strike Avoidance and Injured/Dead Protected Species Reporting;
and, Marine Trash and Debris Awareness and Elimination.'' This notice
also provides the public a second opportunity to comment on the
paperwork burden of these regulatory requirements.
DATES: Submit written comments by December 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this information collection
directly to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for
the Department of the Interior via OMB e-mail: (OIRA--
DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by fax (202) 395-6566; identify with (1010-
0154).
Submit a copy of your comments to the Department of the Interior,
MMS, via:
Public Connect on-line commenting system, https://
ocsconnect.mms.gov. Follow the instructions on the website for
submitting comments.
E-mail MMS at rules.comments@mms.gov. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010-0154 in the subject line.
Fax: 703-787-1093. Identify with Information Collection
Number 1010-0154.
Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the
Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Rules Processing Team
(RPT); 381 Elden Street, MS-4024; Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. Please
reference ``Information Collection 1010-0154'' in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Blundon, Regulations and
Standards Branch, (703) 787-1607. You may also contact Cheryl Blundon
to obtain a copy, at no cost, of the NTLs that require the subject
collection of information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs)--Implementation of
Seismic Survey Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer
Program; Vessel Strike Avoidance and Injured/Dead Protected Species
Reporting; and, Marine Trash and Debris Awareness and Elimination.
OMB Control Number: 1010-0154.
Abstract: The Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act, as amended
(43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq. and 43 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), authorizes the
Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to
administer leasing of the OCS. Such rules and regulations will apply to
all operations conducted under a lease. Operations on the OCS must
preserve, protect, and develop oil and natural gas resources in a
manner that is consistent with the need to make such resources
available to meet the Nation's energy needs as rapidly as possible; to
balance orderly energy resource development with protection of human,
marine, and coastal environments; to ensure the public a fair and
equitable return on the resources of the OCS; and to preserve and
maintain free enterprise competition.
As a Federal agency, we have a continuing affirmative duty to
comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This includes a
substantive duty to carry out any agency action in a manner that is not
likely to jeopardize protected species as well as a procedural duty to
consult with the FWS and NOAA Fisheries before engaging in a
discretionary action that may affect a protected species.
The MMS follows these procedural requirements by conducting formal
consultations with FWS and NOAA Fisheries prior to lease sales.
Consultations on OCS lease sales 181, 184, and the 5-year multisale
(2002-2007) program in the Central and Western Planning Areas of the
Gulf of Mexico (GOM) resulted in no-jeopardy biological opinions from
the FWS and NOAA Fisheries. In their biological opinions, NOAA
Fisheries determined that some activities associated with the proposed
action (lease sale and related exploration, development, and production
activities) may adversely affect (harm) sperm whales and sea turtles in
the action area and that certain reasonable and prudent measures are
necessary to minimize the potential for incidental take of these
animals. To be exempt from the prohibitions of Section 9 of the ESA
(which prohibits taking listed species), MMS must implement and enforce
nondiscretionary terms and conditions. The ESA also requires monitoring
and reporting. Monitoring programs resulting from ESA interagency
consultations are designed to (1) detect adverse effects resulting from
a proposed action, (2) assess the actual level of incidental take in
comparison with the level of anticipated incidental take documented in
the biological opinion, (3) detect when the level of anticipated take
is exceeded, and (4) determine the effectiveness of reasonable and
prudent alternatives and their implementing terms and conditions.
To provide supplementary guidance and procedures, MMS issues
Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs) on a regional or national
basis. Regulation 30 CFR 250.103 allows MMS to issue NTLs to clarify,
supplement, or provide more detail about certain requirements. To
implement the nondiscretionary terms and conditions of these biological
opinions, the MMS issued three NTLs, as follows (note that the NTL
numbers were removed since they will be reissued after renewal):
Implementation of Seismic Survey Mitigation Measures and
Protected Species Observer Program,
Vessel Strike Avoidance and Injured/Dead Protected Species
Reporting,
Marine Trash and Debris Awareness and Elimination.
It should be noted that it has now become common practice for OCS
lessees and operators to subcontract the marine mammal observation and
monitoring activities associated with the requirements of the Seismic
Survey Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer Program NTL.
[[Page 67631]]
MMS has been working on rulemaking, 1010-AD10, to incorporate the
requirements in the NTLs into our regulations. Once final rulemaking
becomes effective, the burden hours for this collection will be
consolidated into the primary collection of 30 CFR part 250 subpart B,
1010-0151. We will then submit to OMB a request to discontinue this
collection.
MMS will use the information collected to report annually to NOAA
Fisheries the effectiveness of mitigation, any adverse effects of the
proposed action, and any incidental take, in accordance with 50 CFR
402.14(i)(3). MMS engineers, geologists, geophysicists, environmental
scientists, and other federal agencies (FWS, NOAA Fisheries, etc.) also
will analyze the information and data collected under these NTLs to
better evaluate the potential impacts to listed species and to plan
operations in a manner that will further reduce and/or avoid adverse
impacts to protected species on the OCS.
We will protect information from respondents considered proprietary
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and its
implementing regulations (43 CFR Part 2). No items of a sensitive
nature are collected. Responses are mandatory.
Frequency: On occasion, annually, and on the 1st and 15th of each
month for the marine mammal observation reports.
Estimated Number and Description of Respondents: Approximately 130
Federal OCS lessees and operators.
Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ``Hour'' Burden: The
estimated annual ``hour'' burden for this information collection is a
total of 1,002 hours. The following chart details the individual
components and estimated hour burdens. In calculating the burdens, MMS
assumed that respondents perform certain requirements in the normal
course of their activities. MMS considers these to be usual and
customary and took that into account in estimating the burden.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting, posting,
NTL title or recordkeeping Hour burden Average No. of Annual burden
requirement annual responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation of Seismic Survey Submit to MMS \1/2\ hour......... 24 reports x 4 48
Mitigation Measures and observer training vessels = 96.
Protected Species Observer requirement
Program. materials and
information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Training \1/2\ hour......... 20................. 10
certification and
recordkeeping.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If used, submit to 1 hour............. 3.................. 3
MMS information on
any passive
acoustic
monitoring system
prior to placing
it in service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit to MMS 345 hours*......... 2 reports.......... 690
marine mammal
observation
report(s). (This
includes observer
duty and training
and are the
occasional
activities done in-
house and not
subcontracted
out.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessel Strike Avoidance and Submit injured/dead \1/2\ hour......... 2 reports.......... 1
Injured/Dead Protected Species protected species
Reporting. report.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine Trash and Debris Awareness Submit request for \1/2\ hour......... 100 requests....... 50
and Elimination. training video.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit annual \1/2\ hour......... 200 records........ 100
report to MMS on
training process
and certification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Training \1/2\ hour......... 200 records........ 100
recordkeeping.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post placards on vessels and structures. (Exempt from 0
information collection burden because MMS is providing exact
language for the trash and debris warning, similar to the
``Surgeon General's Warning'' exemption.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Hour Burden.......................................................... 623 responses...... 1,002 hrs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ``Non-Hour Cost'' Burden: We
have identified three non-hour costs associated with this IC that were
originally estimated as hour burdens. As previously explained,
typically these activities are now subcontracted to other service
companies with expertise in these areas. Therefore, in this submission
we have significantly reduced the corresponding hours and put the
majority of the costs associated with these requirements in the ``non-
hour cost'' burden. To allow for the potential in-house reporting by
lessees/operators, we have retained a minimal hour burden in the hour
burden table. It should be noted that the costs identified are
associated with the NTL: Implementation of Seismic Survey Mitigation
Measures and Protected Species Observer Program.
Observer training--8 hrs @ $37.50 hr = $300 x 72 observers
= $21,600.
Submit observation report/form--1 hr @ $52 hr = $52 x 200
reports/forms = $10,400.
Observation duty--8 hrs x 3 observers = 24 x 4 vessels =
96 hrs x 365 days/yr = 35,040 hours x $52 hr = $1,822,080.
Therefore, we estimate that the annual non-hour cost burden is
$1,854,080.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.)
provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of information, you are not obligated
to respond.
Comments: Before submitting an ICR to OMB, PRA section
3506(c)(2)(A) requires each agency ``* * * to provide notice * * * and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed
[[Page 67632]]
collection of information * * *'' Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the agency to perform its duties,
including whether the information is useful; (b) evaluate the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public consultation process, on May 10, 2006, we
published a Federal Register notice (71 FR 27268) announcing that we
would submit this ICR to OMB for approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. In addition, Sec. 250.199 also informs
the public that they may comment at any time on the collections of
information and provides the address to which they should send
comments. We received several comments in response to these efforts.
The following discusses the comments and MMS's responses.
Comment A: We request that the MMS demonstrate that the monitoring
and reporting requirements of NTL 2004-G01, Implementation of Seismic
Survey Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer Program, have
in fact been approved by OMB under the PRA.
Response A: As a means to implement non-discretionary terms and
conditions imposed by NOAA in their July 2002 biological opinion for
Lease Sale 184 and subsequent Endangered Species Act section 7
consultations, MMS sought emergency information collection (IC)
approval from OMB. OMB issued the emergency IC approval (OMB Control
Number 1010-0154) on 3/26/2003, for 180 days with an expiration date of
9/30/2003. MMS issued NTL 2003-G08 ``Implementation of Seismic Survey
Mitigation Measures and Protected Species Observer Program'' with an
effective date of 6/5/2003. MMS then began the process of obtaining the
standard 3-year OMB IC approval for the NTL. During that process, MMS
expanded the scope of the NTL to cover additional marine mammals and
water depths less than 200 meters in the Eastern Planning Area of the
Gulf of Mexico. OMB IC approval for the NTL with revised scope was
granted (1010-0154) on 12/05/03. MMS reissued the NTL (after the
effective date of the OMB IC approval) in 2004, with a 2004 NTL number,
NTL 2004-G01 (which means the first NTL issued by the Gulf of Mexico
Regional Office in the year 2004).
Comment B: We request that MMS demonstrate that there are no costs
to comply with the monitoring and reporting requirements of NTL 2004-
G01.
Response B: The initial standard IC request for this NTL went out
for public comment with a 60-day (68 FR 25905 May 14, 2003) and 30-day
(68 FR 56313 September 30, 2003) Federal Register notice. In the
standard IC request, MMS states ``* * * Agencies must also estimate the
``non-hour cost'' burdens to respondents or recordkeepers resulting
from the collection of information. Therefore, if you have costs to
generate, maintain, and disclose this information, you should comment
and provide your total capital and startup cost components or annual
operations, maintenance, and purchase of service components * * *'' MMS
did receive a comment expressing concern about the possible costs
associated with these NTLs. However, the commenter did not identify any
specific non-hour cost estimates associated with the activities.
Therefore, in the 2003 submission to OMB requesting a standard three-
year extension of the emergency approval, MMS reported that we had not
identified any non-hour cost burdens associated with the NTLs. OMB
granted the three-year approval with the current December 31, 2006,
expiration date.
During this current 2006 renewal process, we again published the
60-day comment notice in the Federal Register (71 FR 27268, 5/10/2006).
We received the above comment pertaining to the non-hour cost burdens.
Based upon this comment, and the previous 2003 comment expressing
concern over the costs associated with the requirements imposed by
these NTLs, MMS has further investigated both the hour and non-hour
cost burdens. Our findings revealed that lessees and operators now
routinely subcontract the marine mammal observation and monitoring
activities detailed in one of the NTLs. This results in ``non-hour''
cost burdens ($1,854,080) in the form of service contracts, rather than
in-house company employees performing these duties with corresponding
``hour'' burden costs. Therefore, in this ICR we have adjusted all of
our estimates accordingly for both the hour and non-hour cost burdens.
Comment C: We request that MMS confirm our understanding that the
proposed extension of OMB No. 1010-0154 indicates that MMS does not
intend or foresee any changes in the NTL 2004-G01 monitoring,
reporting, and mitigation requirements. Any new requirements would
require a new ICR, would require a new public comment period, and would
have to pass the practical utility test.
Response C: After OMB renews this collection, MMS will reissue NTL
2004-G01 with no changes in requirements. Should MMS need to impose new
requirements, MMS would seek OMB IC approval and provide notice for
public comment. However, the NTL will be reissued with a current year
NTL number (which will have either a 2006 or 2007 to signify the year
that the NTL was issued, and a different G number, signifying the
alphanumerical order of an NTL) and will display the new OMB approval
expiration date and a revised PRA paragraph to reflect the re-estimated
IC hour and non-hour cost burdens.
Comment D: One commenter posed a question concerning the validity
of observers and their qualifications.
Response D: This comment does not pertain to the information
collection burden of the requirements. But, in response, it should be
noted that all visual observers must have completed a protected species
observer training course. MMS will not sanction particular trainers or
training programs. Training is offered by independent entities.
However, basic training criteria have been established and must be
adhered to by any entity that offers observer training. Operators may
utilize observers trained by third parties, may send crew for training
conducted by third parties, or may develop their own training program.
All training programs offering to fulfill the observer training
requirement must: (1) Furnish to MMS, at the address listed in the NTL
titled, Implementation of Seismic Survey Mitigation Measures and
Protected Species Observer Program, a course information packet that
includes the name and qualifications (i.e., experience, training
completed, or educational background) of the instructor(s), the course
outline or syllabus, and course reference material; (2) furnish each
trainee with a document stating successful completion of the course;
and (3) provide MMS with names, affiliations, and dates of course
completion of trainees. The training course must include the following
elements: overview of the MMPA and the ESA as they relate to seismic
acquisition and protection of marine mammals and sea turtles in the
GOM; overview of seismic acquisition operations in the GOM; overview of
seismic mitigation measures (NTLs) and the protected species observer
program in the GOM; discussion of the role and responsibilities of the
protected species observer in the GOM, including the
[[Page 67633]]
legal requirements (why you are here and what you do), professional
behavior (code of conduct), integrity, authority of protected species
observer to call for shut-down of seismic acquisition operations,
assigned duties--what can/cannot be asked of the observer, reporting of
violations and coercion; identification of GOM marine mammals and sea
turtles, with emphasis on whales; cues and search methods for locating
marine mammals, especially whales, and sea turtles; data collection and
reporting requirements--forms and reports to MMS on the 1st and 15th of
each month, whale in exclusion zone/shut-down report within 24 hours.
If you wish to comment in response to this notice, you may send
your comments to the offices listed under the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30 days. Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive public comments by December 22, 2006.
Public Comment Procedures: MMS's practice is to make comments,
including the names and addresses of respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their
address from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to the extent
allowable by law. There may be circumstances in which we would withhold
from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable by the law. If
you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your comment. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this information. This rationale
must demonstrate that disclosure ``would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy.'' Unsupported assertions will not meet this
burden. In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. However, we will not consider anonymous
comments. Except for proprietary information, we will make all
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
MMS Information Collection Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (202)
208-7744.
Dated: September 26, 2006.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-19687 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P