Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 67652-67654 [E6-19608]

Download as PDF 67652 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices APPENDIX [TAA petitions instituted between 10/30/06 and 11/3/06] Date of institution Date of petition TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location 60322 ............. 60323 ............. Western Textile Printing Co. (COMP) ............ Cookson Electronics/Fry Metals Inc./Alpha Metals (Union). Lines Unlimted, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................ West TN Machining (Wkrs) ............................ Paxar Corporation (Wkrs) .............................. Production Products (Wkrs) ........................... Johnson Controls Inc. (Union) ....................... Dirigo Stitching (COMP) ................................. Paige Electric (Wkrs) ..................................... UGM, Inc. (COMP) ......................................... Valley-Dynamo (COMP) ................................. Intel-Jones Farm Camps (Wkrs) .................... Intel Cornell Oaks Campus (Wkrs) ................ Intel Ronier Acres Campus (Wkrs) ................ Ward Products (Wkrs) .................................... Production Products (Wkrs) ........................... Intel Elam Young Campus (Wkrs) ................. Intel–Aloha Campus (Wkrs) ........................... Intel-AmerGlen Campus (Wkrs) ..................... Intel Evergreen Campus (Wkrs) .................... General Cable Corporation (Wkrs) ................ Welch Allyn, Inc. (COMP) .............................. Georgia Pacific Corporation (Wkrs) ............... Pride Manufacturing Co. (COMP) .................. Tubular Technologies, LLC (COMP) ............. Timken Company (Union) .............................. Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii) Inc. (COMP). Versa-Tech Machining, Inc. (Wkrs) ............... Clariant Corporation (COMP) ......................... Gyrus ACMI Corporation (Comp) .................. Imperial World (State) .................................... Rice Mills, Inc. (Comp) ................................... Altana Pharma USA (Comp) .......................... Altana Pharma USA (Comp) .......................... Xron, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................................ Turtle Wax, Inc. (Union) ................................. Adapto-Indiana, Inc. (IBT) .............................. Calhoun Apparel, Inc. (Comp) ....................... Affinia Group, Inc. /Brake Parts, Inc. (Wkrs) Yakima Resources, LLC (UBCJA) ................. Meadwestvaco (Union) .................................. Blederlack of America Corporation (Comp) ... Guido Corporation (Wkrs) .............................. New Page Corporation—Rumford Mill (USW) Piedmont, SC ................................................. Jersey City, NJ ............................................... 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/27/06 10/27/06 Kernersville, NC ............................................. Camden, TN ................................................... Fair Lawn, NJ ................................................. Bonne Terre, MO ........................................... Fullerton, CA .................................................. Skowhegan, ME ............................................. McConnellsburg, PA ...................................... Salida, CA ...................................................... Richland Hills, TX ........................................... Hillsboro, OR .................................................. Beaverton, OR ............................................... Hillsboro, OR .................................................. North Brunswick, NJ ...................................... Bonne Terre, MO ........................................... Hillsboro, OR .................................................. Aloha, OR ....................................................... Beaverton, OR ............................................... Hillsboro, OR .................................................. Lawrenceburg, KY .......................................... San Diego, CA ............................................... El Dorado, AR ................................................ Portal, GA ....................................................... Welcome, NC ................................................. Torrington, CT ................................................ Honolulu, HI ................................................... 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/30/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 10/20/06 10/27/06 10/27/06 10/23/06 10/25/06 10/30/06 10/24/06 10/20/06 10/26/06 10/24/06 10/26/06 10/26/06 10/30/06 10/26/06 10/26/06 10/26/06 10/24/06 10/26/06 10/29/06 10/27/06 10/30/06 10/25/06 10/27/06 10/31/06 10/30/06 Union, SC ....................................................... Coventry, RI ................................................... Racine, WI ...................................................... Westmont, IL .................................................. Belton, SC ...................................................... Florham Park, NJ ........................................... Waltham, MA .................................................. Garden Grove, CA ......................................... Willowbrook, IL ............................................... South Bend, IN ............................................... Calhoun City, MS ........................................... Cuba, MO ....................................................... Yakima, WA ................................................... Colton, CA ...................................................... Cumberland, MD ............................................ Pendleton, IN ................................................. Rumford, ME .................................................. 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/01/06 11/02/06 11/02/06 11/02/06 11/02/06 11/02/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 10/13/06 10/27/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/31/06 10/27/06 10/27/06 10/26/06 10/31/06 11/01/06 10/30/06 10/29/06 10/31/06 11/01/06 10/13/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 60324 60325 60326 60327 60328 60329 60330 60331 60332 60333 60334 60335 60336 60337 60338 60339 60340 60341 60342 60343 60344 60345 60346 60347 60348 ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. 60349 ............. 60350 ............. 60351 ............. 60352 ............. 60353 ............. 60354 ............. 60354A ........... 60355 ............. 60356 ............. 60357 ............. 60358 ............. 60359 ............. 60360 ............. 60361 ............. 60362 ............. 60363 ............. 60364 ............. [FR Doc. E6–19695 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request ACTION: Notice. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13 (44 U.S.C. U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), and as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:25 Nov 21, 2006 Jkt 211001 comment on this information collection. This is the second notice for public comment; the first was published in the Federal Register at 71 FR 51641 and no substantive comments were received regarding the materials provided. NSF is forwarding the proposed submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the publication of this second notice. Comments regarding these information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 requests for copies of the proposed information collection request should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling (703) 292–7556. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Contact Suzanne Plimpton, the NSF Reports Clearance Officer, phone (703) 292–7556, or send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1 67653 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey Improvement Projects. OMB Approval Number: 3145–0174. Abstract: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey Improvement Projects. The National Science Foundation’s Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS) needs to collect timely data on constant changes in the science and technology sector and to provide the most complete and accurate information possible to policy makers in Congress and throughout government and academia. NSF/SRS conducts many surveys to obtain the data for these purposes. The Generic Clearance will be used to ensure that the highest quality data are obtained from these surveys. State-ofthe-art methodology will be used to develop, evaluate, and test questionnaires and survey concepts as well as to improve survey methodology. This may include field or pilot tests of questions for future large-scale surveys, as needed. Expected Respondents: The respondents will be from industry, academia, nonprofit organizations, members of the public, and state, local, and federal governments. Respondents will be either individuals or institutions, depending upon the survey under investigation. Qualitative procedures will generally be conducted in person or over the phone, but quantitative procedures may be conducted using mail, web, e-mail, or phone modes, depending on the topic under investigation. Up to 19,150 respondents will be contacted across all survey improvement projects. No respondent will be contacted more than twice in one year under this generic clearance. Every effort will be made to use technology to limit the burden on respondents from small entities. Both qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to improve NSF’s current data collection instruments and processes and to reduce respondent burden, as well as to develop new surveys. Qualitative methods include, but are not limited to, expert review; exploratory, cognitive, and usability interviews; focus groups; and respondent debriefings. Cognitive and usability interviews may include the use of scenarios, paraphrasing, card sorts, vignette classifications, and rating tasks. Quantitative methods include, but are not limited to, telephone surveys, behavior coding, split panel tests, and field tests. Information being collected is not considered sensitive. In general, assurances of data confidentiality will not be provided to respondents in the pretests. Instead, respondents have the option of requesting that any and all data they provide be kept confidential. Use of the Information: The purpose of these studies is to use the latest and most appropriate methodology to improve NSF surveys. The data will be used internally to improve NSF surveys. Methodological findings may be presented externally in technical papers at conferences, published in the proceedings of conferences, or in journals. Improved NSF surveys will help policy makers in decisions on research and development funding, graduate education, scientific and technical workforce, regulations, and reporting guidelines, as well as contributing to reduced survey costs. Burden on the Public: NSF estimates that a total reporting and recordkeeping burden of 14,950 hours will result from activities to improve its surveys. The calculation is: TABLE 1.—ANTICIPATED SURVEYS TO UNDERTAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, ALONG WITH THE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS AND BURDEN HOURS PER SURVEY FOR THREE YEAR PERIOD Number of respondents1 Survey Name Graduate Student Survey ........................................................................................................................................ SESTAT Surveys ..................................................................................................................................................... Postdoc Project ........................................................................................................................................................ New and Redesigned R&D Surveys: Academic R&D ................................................................................................................................................. Government R&D ............................................................................................................................................. Nonprofit R&D .................................................................................................................................................. Industry R&D .................................................................................................................................................... Survey of Scientific & Engineering Facilities ........................................................................................................... Public Understanding of S&E Surveys .................................................................................................................... Survey of Earned Doctorates .................................................................................................................................. Additional surveys not specified .............................................................................................................................. 2 5,000 Total ........................................................................................................................................................... Hours 10,000 800 3,000 5,000 1,600 600 50 200 500 300 200 300 1,200 1,200 100 100 2,000 150 50 550 1,200 19,150 14,950 1 Number pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES of respondents listed for any individual survey may represent several methodological improvement projects. 2 This number refers to the science, engineering, and health-related departments within the academic institutions of the United States (not the academic institutions themselves). Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed VerDate Aug<31>2005 23:20 Nov 21, 2006 Jkt 211001 collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1 67654 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: November 15, 2006. Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation. [FR Doc. E6–19608 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD The Board currently maintains two systems of records, NWTRB–1 and NWTRB–2, that contain information covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. In its review of these systems, the Board has found classes of information that were not included in its previous notice and is republishing the first, NWTRB–1, with the corrections added. The Board further found that expanding the records in the second, NWTRB–2, would make it more useful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. ACTION: Notice of modification to two existing systems of records. List of Subjects Administrative practice and procedure; Privacy; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. NWTRB–1 AGENCY: USC 552a requires that each federal agency review its systems of records containing personal information covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. As a result of its latest review, the Board is proposing to amend both of the systems of records that it maintains. A description of these systems was last published in November 22, 1996 (61 FR 227, 59472–59473). The Board has concluded that one system needs to be amended and that the second system needs to be expanded to include other information useful to the Board. In the first system, NWTRB–1 Administrative Files, some categories were overlooked in the previous notice. The Board is proposing to expand the second system, NWTRB–2 Mailing List, to become NWTRB–2 Contact List. The Board has determined that the changes to NWTRB–1 are imporant enough to republish the notice with the changes and that the changes to NWTRB–2 are substantial enough to accept comments on the proposed expansion. DATES: Comments on the changes to NWTRB–2 should be received before January 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted as follows: By mail or hand delivery: Joyce M. Dory, Director of Administration; U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201. By Fax: 703–235–4495. To the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Via the Board Web site at https:// www.nwtrb.gov via the ‘‘contact us’’ function. All comments on this proposed Privacy Act rule modification should be clearly identified as such. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Reich, 703–235–4473. pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:25 Nov 21, 2006 Jkt 211001 SYSTEM NAME: Administrative Files. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified. SYSTEM LOCATION: U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201. CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM: Employees and applicants for employment with the Board, including NWTRB contractors and consultants. CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: Records containing the following information: (1) Time and attendance; (2) Payroll actions, direct deposit, and deduction information; (3) Personnel actions, evaluations, and other data; (4) Authorizations for overtime and night differential; (5) Credit cards and telephone calling cards issued to individuals; (6) Destination, itinerary, mode and purpose of travel; (7) Date(s) of travel and all expenses; (8) Passport number; (9) Request for advance of funds and voucher with receipt; (10) Travel authorizations; (11) Name, address, Social Security number, and birth date; (12) Employee public transit subsidy applications and vouchers; (13) Security clearance information; and (14) 450’s. AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: Public Law 100–203, Part E. ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM: Information is used ‘‘in house.’’ Notwithstanding the above, access also PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 may be gained under the following conditions: (a) In the event that a system of records maintained by this agency to carry out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by general statute or particular program statute, or by regulation, rule, or order issued pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may be referred, as a routine use, to the appropriate agency, whether federal, state, local, or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statutes, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. (b) A record from the system of records may be disclosed as a ‘‘routine use’’ to a federal, state, or local agency maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent information, such as current licenses, if necessary to obtain information relevant to an agency decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. (c) A record from this system of records may be disclosed to a federal agency, in response to a request, in connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefits by the requesting agency, to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency’s decision on the matter. POLICY AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: STORAGE: Paper and electronic records. RETRIEVABILITY: By type of document, then by name. SAFEGUARDS: Access is limited to employees having a need to know. Records containing personal information are stored in locked file cabinets in controlled-access areas or in password-protected electronic databases in accordance with federal guidelines. RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: Record retention and disposal authorities are in ‘‘General Records Schedules’’ published by National E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67652-67654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13 (44 
U.S.C. U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), and as part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on this information collection. This is the 
second notice for public comment; the first was published in the 
Federal Register at 71 FR 51641 and no substantive comments were 
received regarding the materials provided. NSF is forwarding the 
proposed submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance simultaneously with the publication of this second notice.

DATES: Comments regarding these information collections are best 
assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days 
of publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and 
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request 
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA 
22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies of the submission may 
be obtained by calling (703) 292-7556.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Contact Suzanne Plimpton, the 
NSF Reports Clearance Officer, phone (703) 292-7556, or send e-mail to 
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8

[[Page 67653]]

p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB 
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to 
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not 
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey 
Improvement Projects.
    OMB Approval Number: 3145-0174.
    Abstract: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics 
Survey Improvement Projects. The National Science Foundation's Division 
of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS) needs to collect timely data 
on constant changes in the science and technology sector and to provide 
the most complete and accurate information possible to policy makers in 
Congress and throughout government and academia. NSF/SRS conducts many 
surveys to obtain the data for these purposes. The Generic Clearance 
will be used to ensure that the highest quality data are obtained from 
these surveys. State-of-the-art methodology will be used to develop, 
evaluate, and test questionnaires and survey concepts as well as to 
improve survey methodology. This may include field or pilot tests of 
questions for future large-scale surveys, as needed.
    Expected Respondents: The respondents will be from industry, 
academia, nonprofit organizations, members of the public, and state, 
local, and federal governments. Respondents will be either individuals 
or institutions, depending upon the survey under investigation. 
Qualitative procedures will generally be conducted in person or over 
the phone, but quantitative procedures may be conducted using mail, 
web, e-mail, or phone modes, depending on the topic under 
investigation. Up to 19,150 respondents will be contacted across all 
survey improvement projects. No respondent will be contacted more than 
twice in one year under this generic clearance. Every effort will be 
made to use technology to limit the burden on respondents from small 
entities.
    Both qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to improve 
NSF's current data collection instruments and processes and to reduce 
respondent burden, as well as to develop new surveys. Qualitative 
methods include, but are not limited to, expert review; exploratory, 
cognitive, and usability interviews; focus groups; and respondent 
debriefings. Cognitive and usability interviews may include the use of 
scenarios, paraphrasing, card sorts, vignette classifications, and 
rating tasks. Quantitative methods include, but are not limited to, 
telephone surveys, behavior coding, split panel tests, and field tests.
    Information being collected is not considered sensitive. In 
general, assurances of data confidentiality will not be provided to 
respondents in the pretests. Instead, respondents have the option of 
requesting that any and all data they provide be kept confidential.
    Use of the Information: The purpose of these studies is to use the 
latest and most appropriate methodology to improve NSF surveys. The 
data will be used internally to improve NSF surveys. Methodological 
findings may be presented externally in technical papers at 
conferences, published in the proceedings of conferences, or in 
journals. Improved NSF surveys will help policy makers in decisions on 
research and development funding, graduate education, scientific and 
technical workforce, regulations, and reporting guidelines, as well as 
contributing to reduced survey costs.
    Burden on the Public: NSF estimates that a total reporting and 
recordkeeping burden of 14,950 hours will result from activities to 
improve its surveys. The calculation is:

 Table 1.--Anticipated Surveys To Undertake Improvement Projects, Along
  With the Number of Respondents and Burden Hours per Survey for Three
                               Year Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Number of
               Survey Name                respondents\1\       Hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Graduate Student Survey.................       \2\ 5,000           3,000
SESTAT Surveys..........................          10,000           5,000
Postdoc Project.........................             800           1,600
New and Redesigned R&D Surveys:
    Academic R&D........................             600           1,200
    Government R&D......................              50             100
    Nonprofit R&D.......................             200             100
    Industry R&D........................             500           2,000
Survey of Scientific & Engineering                   300             150
 Facilities.............................
Public Understanding of S&E Surveys.....             200              50
Survey of Earned Doctorates.............             300             550
Additional surveys not specified........           1,200           1,200
                                         -------------------------------
        Total...........................          19,150          14,950
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Number of respondents listed for any individual survey may represent
  several methodological improvement projects.
\2\ This number refers to the science, engineering, and health-related
  departments within the academic institutions of the United States (not
  the academic institutions themselves).

    Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB

[[Page 67654]]

approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter 
of public record.

    Dated: November 15, 2006.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
 [FR Doc. E6-19608 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.