Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes, 67445-67447 [E6-19534]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Effective Date
(l) This amendment becomes effective on
December 27, 2006.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 8, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–19535 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24877; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–253–AD; Amendment
39–14831; AD 2006–24–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–200B,
747–200C, 747–200F, 747SR, and
747SP Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD),
which applies to certain Boeing Model
747 series airplanes. That AD currently
requires repetitive inspections to detect
cracks at certain stringer fastener
locations; and repair, if necessary. For
certain airplanes, that AD requires a
modification in certain areas where
reports indicate that cracking was
prevalent. This modification terminates
the repetitive inspections only for those
areas, and is also an option for other
airplanes affected by the existing AD.
This new AD requires an additional
inspection of areas that may have
Alodine-coated rivets installed, and
repair if necessary. This AD results from
a report of cracking discovered in a skin
lap joint that was previously inspected
using the eddy current method. We are
issuing this AD to prevent rapid
decompression of the airplane due to
disbonding and subsequent cracking of
the skin panels.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 27, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of December 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6437;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness
directive (AD) docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov or in person at the
Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that
supersedes AD 90–26–10, amendment
39–6836 (55 FR 51401, December 14,
1990). The existing AD applies to
certain Boeing Model 747 series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on May 25, 2006
(71 FR 30074). That NPRM proposed to
continue to require repetitive
inspections to detect cracks at certain
stringer fastener locations, and repair if
necessary. For certain airplanes, that
NPRM proposed to continue to require
modification in certain areas where
reports indicate that cracking was
prevalent. This modification terminates
the repetitive inspections only for those
areas, and is also an option for other
airplanes affected by the existing AD.
That NPRM also proposed to require an
additional inspection of areas that may
have Alodine-coated rivets installed,
and repair if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments that have
been received on the NPRM.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing supports the NPRM.
Request To Recognize Overlapping
Inspections
The Air Transport Association, on
behalf of one of its members, Northwest
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67445
Airlines, requests that we recognize that
a service bulletin currently in
development could result in
overlapping inspections and cause
duplication of efforts. Northwest
Airlines states that it has been advised
by Boeing that the service bulletin in
development will recommend external
detailed inspections and/or external
surface high frequency eddy current
inspections in a good portion of the
region affected by the NPRM. This new
service bulletin resulted from a recent
report of skin cracking in section 41.
We partially agree with the
commenters. We agree that it is
important to avoid duplication of effort.
However, because the service bulletin
that the commenters mention has not
been issued, we have not issued an
NPRM for the subject of that service
bulletin. When the service bulletin is
issued, we will review it and any
forthcoming proposed rule in an effort
to prevent duplication of tasks. We
consider that to delay this AD action
would be inappropriate, since we have
determined that an unsafe condition
exists and that replacement of certain
parts must be accomplished to ensure
continued safety. We have not changed
the AD in this regard.
Explanation of Editorial Changes
We have clarified the Summary
section of this AD to state that this new
AD requires ‘‘an additional inspection’’
rather than a one-time inspection at a
reduced threshold. The new inspection
required by this AD is ‘‘additional’’ and,
therefore, we are not reducing a
threshold in the previous AD.
We have also removed the words, ‘‘at
intervals not to exceed 150 flight
cycles’’ from paragraph (k)(1)(i) of this
AD because it duplicates information
already in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD,
and may cause confusion.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD. There are about
132 airplanes of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. This AD affects
about 59 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
average labor rate is $80 per work hour.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
67446
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Work hours
Parts
Cost per airplane
$3,840, per inspection
cycle.
$118,846 ......................
$3,840, per inspection
cycle.
Inspection (required by AD 90–26–10) ...............
48
None ...........
Modification (required by AD 90–26–10) ............
Inspection (new action) .......................................
620
48
$69,246 .......
None ...........
Authority for This Rulemaking
Adoption of the Amendment
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
I
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by removing amendment 39–6836 (55
FR 51401, December 14, 1990) and by
adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
I
2006–24–02 Boeing: Amendment 39–14831.
Docket No. FAA–2006–24877;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–253–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective December
27, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 90–26–10.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
100, 747–100B, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–
200F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes,
certificated in any category; line numbers 001
through 430 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of
cracking discovered in a skin lap joint that
was previously inspected using the eddy
current method. We are issuing this AD to
prevent rapid decompression of the airplane
due to disbonding and subsequent cracking
of the skin panels.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD
90–26–10
Inspections
(f) Prior to the accumulation of 12,000
flight cycles or within the next 1,000 flight
cycles after January 22, 1991 (the effective
date of AD 90–26–10), whichever occurs
later, unless previously accomplished within
the last 1,000 flight cycles, conduct an
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fleet cost
$226,560, per inspection cycle.
$7,011,914.
$226,560, per inspection cycle.
external detailed and external high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) inspection for cracks of
the fuselage skin from body station (BS) 220
to BS 520, left- and right-hand sides of the
airplane between stringers (S)–6 and S–14,
excluding the skin lap joints, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2321,
dated October 31, 1989; or Revision 7, dated
October 27, 2005. After the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 7 may be used. Doing
the inspections in this paragraph in
accordance with Revision 7 of the service
bulletin eliminates the need for doing the
actions in paragraph (k) of this AD. Repeat
the inspections thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 2,000 flight cycles until the
terminating modification in paragraph (g) of
this AD is done, except as provided by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Terminating Modification
(g) For airplanes line numbers 001 through
200 inclusive, prior to the accumulation of
20,000 total flight cycles, or within 48
months after the January 22, 1991, whichever
occurs later: Perform the terminating
modification of the skin panel from BS 340
to BS 520, S–6 to S–14, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2321, dated
October 31, 1989; or Revision 7, dated
October 27, 2005. After the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 7 may be used. The
modification consists of replacing the skin
panel with a new skin panel which was
manufactured utilizing the improved hot
phosphoric acid anodize bonding process.
(h) Replacement of the skin panel required
by paragraph (g) of this AD constitutes
terminating action for the inspections from
BS 340 to BS 520 required by paragraphs (f)
and (k) of this AD. The inspections from BS
220 to BS 340 required by paragraph (f) of
this AD are to be continued.
Adjustments for Cabin Differential Pressure
(i) Before the effective date of this AD:
Flight cycles conducted at 2.0 pounds per
square inch (psi) or less cabin differential
pressure need not be counted for the purpose
of this airworthiness directive.
(j) Before the effective date of this AD: For
Model 747SR airplanes only, the threshold
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and repetitive inspection intervals specified
herein may be multiplied by the 1.2
adjustment factor based on continued mixed
operation at lower cabin pressure
differentials.
New Requirements of This AD
Additional Inspection of Skins With
Alodine-Coated Rivets
(k) For airplanes identified in Figure 9 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2321,
Revision 7, dated October 27, 2005, as
requiring additional inspection: Within 150
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, do the inspection in paragraph (k)(1) or
(k)(2) of this AD in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin.
(1) Do an external detailed inspection for
cracking of Area 1, and repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150 flight
cycles until one of the actions in paragraph
(k)(1)(i), (k)(1)(ii), or (k)(1)(iii) is
accomplished. Repeat the inspection of Area
1 thereafter in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
(i) The inspection in accordance with
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD has been done
seven times. If this option is used: Within
150 flight cycles after the seventh inspection,
do the inspection required by paragraph
(k)(2) of this AD.
(ii) The inspection in accordance with
paragraph (k)(2) has been accomplished.
(iii) The inspections in accordance with
paragraph (f) of this AD has been
accomplished once in accordance with
Revision 7 of the service bulletin.
(2) Do an external HFEC inspection for
cracking of Area 1 in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2321, Revision 7,
dated October 27, 2005. Repeat the
inspection of Area 1 thereafter in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this
AD.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Repair
(l) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by this AD: Before
further flight, repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2321, dated October
31, 1989; or Revision 7, dated October 27,
2005. After the effective date of this AD, only
Revision 7 of the service bulletin may be
used. Where Revision 7 of the service
bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for repair
instructions: Before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of
this AD.
Adjustments to Compliance Time: Cabin
Differential Pressure
(m) For the purposes of calculating the
compliance threshold and repetitive interval
for actions required by paragraphs (f), (g), and
(k) of this AD, on or after the effective date
of this AD: All flight cycles, including the
number of flight cycles in which cabin
differential pressure is at 2.0 psi or less, must
be counted when determining the number of
flight cycles that have occurred on the
airplane, and a 1.2 adjustment factor may not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
be used. However, for airplanes on which the
repetitive interval for the actions required by
paragraphs (f) and (k) of this AD have been
calculated in accordance with paragraph (i)
or (j) of this AD by excluding the number of
flight cycles in which cabin differential
pressure is at 2.0 pounds psi or less, or by
using a 1.2 adjustment factor: Continue to
adjust the repetitive interval in accordance
with paragraph (i) or (j) of this AD until the
next inspections required by paragraph (f) or
(k) of this AD are accomplished. Thereafter,
no adjustment to compliance times based on
paragraph (i) or (j) of this AD is allowed.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 90–26–10 are acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of this
AD, provided that any alternative terminating
action was not based upon inspection results
using sliding probe low-frequency eddy
current (LFEC), sliding probe HFEC, or midfrequency eddy current (MFEC) inspection
method; and provided that any alternative
method future inspections did not
incorporate sliding probe LFEC or MFEC
inspection method.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2321, dated October 31,
1989; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
53A2321, Revision 7, dated October 27, 2005;
as applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. (Only the first page of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2321, dated
October 31, 1989, contains the document
issue date; no other page of this document
contains this information.) The Director of
the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of these
documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207, for a copy
of this service information. You may review
copies at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Room PL–401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67447
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 8, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–19534 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 060731206–6280–02; I.D.
072806A]
RIN 0648–AS67
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 26
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Amendment 26 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP). Amendment 26 establishes an
individual fishing quota (IFQ) program
for the commercial red snapper sector of
the reef fish fishery in the Gulf of
Mexico. Initial participants in the IFQ
program will receive percentage shares
of the commercial quota of red snapper
based on specified historical landings
criteria. The percentage shares of the
commercial quota will equate to annual
IFQ allocations. Both shares and IFQ
allocations will be transferable. In
addition, NMFS informs the public of
the approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this final rule and
publishes the OMB control numbers for
those collections. The intended effect of
this rule is to manage the commercial
red snapper sector of the reef fish
fishery to preserve its long-term
economic viability and to achieve
optimum yield from the fishery.
DATES: This rule is effective January 1,
2007, except: Amendments to
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67445-67447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19534]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24877; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-253-AD;
Amendment 39-14831; AD 2006-24-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-
200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes. That
AD currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracks at
certain stringer fastener locations; and repair, if necessary. For
certain airplanes, that AD requires a modification in certain areas
where reports indicate that cracking was prevalent. This modification
terminates the repetitive inspections only for those areas, and is also
an option for other airplanes affected by the existing AD. This new AD
requires an additional inspection of areas that may have Alodine-coated
rivets installed, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a
report of cracking discovered in a skin lap joint that was previously
inspected using the eddy current method. We are issuing this AD to
prevent rapid decompression of the airplane due to disbonding and
subsequent cracking of the skin panels.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 27, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of December 27,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for service information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6437;
fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 90-26-10, amendment 39-
6836 (55 FR 51401, December 14, 1990). The existing AD applies to
certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes. That NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on May 25, 2006 (71 FR 30074). That NPRM proposed
to continue to require repetitive inspections to detect cracks at
certain stringer fastener locations, and repair if necessary. For
certain airplanes, that NPRM proposed to continue to require
modification in certain areas where reports indicate that cracking was
prevalent. This modification terminates the repetitive inspections only
for those areas, and is also an option for other airplanes affected by
the existing AD. That NPRM also proposed to require an additional
inspection of areas that may have Alodine-coated rivets installed, and
repair if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been
received on the NPRM.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing supports the NPRM.
Request To Recognize Overlapping Inspections
The Air Transport Association, on behalf of one of its members,
Northwest Airlines, requests that we recognize that a service bulletin
currently in development could result in overlapping inspections and
cause duplication of efforts. Northwest Airlines states that it has
been advised by Boeing that the service bulletin in development will
recommend external detailed inspections and/or external surface high
frequency eddy current inspections in a good portion of the region
affected by the NPRM. This new service bulletin resulted from a recent
report of skin cracking in section 41.
We partially agree with the commenters. We agree that it is
important to avoid duplication of effort. However, because the service
bulletin that the commenters mention has not been issued, we have not
issued an NPRM for the subject of that service bulletin. When the
service bulletin is issued, we will review it and any forthcoming
proposed rule in an effort to prevent duplication of tasks. We consider
that to delay this AD action would be inappropriate, since we have
determined that an unsafe condition exists and that replacement of
certain parts must be accomplished to ensure continued safety. We have
not changed the AD in this regard.
Explanation of Editorial Changes
We have clarified the Summary section of this AD to state that this
new AD requires ``an additional inspection'' rather than a one-time
inspection at a reduced threshold. The new inspection required by this
AD is ``additional'' and, therefore, we are not reducing a threshold in
the previous AD.
We have also removed the words, ``at intervals not to exceed 150
flight cycles'' from paragraph (k)(1)(i) of this AD because it
duplicates information already in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD, and may
cause confusion.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD. There are about 132 airplanes of the affected
design in the worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 59 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The average labor rate is $80 per work hour.
[[Page 67446]]
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Work hours Parts Cost per airplane Fleet cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection (required by AD 90-26-10) 48 None.................... $3,840, per inspection $226,560, per inspection cycle.
cycle.
Modification (required by AD 90-26- 620 $69,246................. $118,846.............. $7,011,914.
10).
Inspection (new action)............. 48 None.................... $3,840, per inspection $226,560, per inspection cycle.
cycle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
removing amendment 39-6836 (55 FR 51401, December 14, 1990) and by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-24-02 Boeing: Amendment 39-14831. Docket No. FAA-2006-24877;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-253-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective December 27, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 90-26-10.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-200B,
747-200C, 747-200F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated
in any category; line numbers 001 through 430 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of cracking discovered in a
skin lap joint that was previously inspected using the eddy current
method. We are issuing this AD to prevent rapid decompression of the
airplane due to disbonding and subsequent cracking of the skin
panels.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 90-26-10
Inspections
(f) Prior to the accumulation of 12,000 flight cycles or within
the next 1,000 flight cycles after January 22, 1991 (the effective
date of AD 90-26-10), whichever occurs later, unless previously
accomplished within the last 1,000 flight cycles, conduct an
external detailed and external high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracks of the fuselage skin from body station (BS)
220 to BS 520, left- and right-hand sides of the airplane between
stringers (S)-6 and S-14, excluding the skin lap joints, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2321, dated October 31, 1989; or Revision 7,
dated October 27, 2005. After the effective date of this AD, only
Revision 7 may be used. Doing the inspections in this paragraph in
accordance with Revision 7 of the service bulletin eliminates the
need for doing the actions in paragraph (k) of this AD. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,000 flight
cycles until the terminating modification in paragraph (g) of this
AD is done, except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Terminating Modification
(g) For airplanes line numbers 001 through 200 inclusive, prior
to the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or within 48
months after the January 22, 1991, whichever occurs later: Perform
the terminating modification of the skin panel from BS 340 to BS
520, S-6 to S-14, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2321, dated October 31,
1989; or Revision 7, dated October 27, 2005. After the effective
date of this AD, only Revision 7 may be used. The modification
consists of replacing the skin panel with a new skin panel which was
manufactured utilizing the improved hot phosphoric acid anodize
bonding process.
(h) Replacement of the skin panel required by paragraph (g) of
this AD constitutes terminating action for the inspections from BS
340 to BS 520 required by paragraphs (f) and (k) of this AD. The
inspections from BS 220 to BS 340 required by paragraph (f) of this
AD are to be continued.
Adjustments for Cabin Differential Pressure
(i) Before the effective date of this AD: Flight cycles
conducted at 2.0 pounds per square inch (psi) or less cabin
differential pressure need not be counted for the purpose of this
airworthiness directive.
(j) Before the effective date of this AD: For Model 747SR
airplanes only, the threshold
[[Page 67447]]
and repetitive inspection intervals specified herein may be
multiplied by the 1.2 adjustment factor based on continued mixed
operation at lower cabin pressure differentials.
New Requirements of This AD
Additional Inspection of Skins With Alodine-Coated Rivets
(k) For airplanes identified in Figure 9 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2321, Revision
7, dated October 27, 2005, as requiring additional inspection:
Within 150 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, do the
inspection in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
(1) Do an external detailed inspection for cracking of Area 1,
and repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150
flight cycles until one of the actions in paragraph (k)(1)(i),
(k)(1)(ii), or (k)(1)(iii) is accomplished. Repeat the inspection of
Area 1 thereafter in accordance with the requirements of paragraph
(f) of this AD.
(i) The inspection in accordance with paragraph (k)(1) of this
AD has been done seven times. If this option is used: Within 150
flight cycles after the seventh inspection, do the inspection
required by paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.
(ii) The inspection in accordance with paragraph (k)(2) has been
accomplished.
(iii) The inspections in accordance with paragraph (f) of this
AD has been accomplished once in accordance with Revision 7 of the
service bulletin.
(2) Do an external HFEC inspection for cracking of Area 1 in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2321, Revision 7, dated October 27, 2005.
Repeat the inspection of Area 1 thereafter in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Repair
(l) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this
AD: Before further flight, repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2321, dated October 31, 1989; or Revision 7, dated October 27,
2005. After the effective date of this AD, only Revision 7 of the
service bulletin may be used. Where Revision 7 of the service
bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions: Before
further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD.
Adjustments to Compliance Time: Cabin Differential Pressure
(m) For the purposes of calculating the compliance threshold and
repetitive interval for actions required by paragraphs (f), (g), and
(k) of this AD, on or after the effective date of this AD: All
flight cycles, including the number of flight cycles in which cabin
differential pressure is at 2.0 psi or less, must be counted when
determining the number of flight cycles that have occurred on the
airplane, and a 1.2 adjustment factor may not be used. However, for
airplanes on which the repetitive interval for the actions required
by paragraphs (f) and (k) of this AD have been calculated in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (j) of this AD by excluding the
number of flight cycles in which cabin differential pressure is at
2.0 pounds psi or less, or by using a 1.2 adjustment factor:
Continue to adjust the repetitive interval in accordance with
paragraph (i) or (j) of this AD until the next inspections required
by paragraph (f) or (k) of this AD are accomplished. Thereafter, no
adjustment to compliance times based on paragraph (i) or (j) of this
AD is allowed.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 90-26-10 are
acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this AD, provided
that any alternative terminating action was not based upon
inspection results using sliding probe low-frequency eddy current
(LFEC), sliding probe HFEC, or mid-frequency eddy current (MFEC)
inspection method; and provided that any alternative method future
inspections did not incorporate sliding probe LFEC or MFEC
inspection method.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2321,
dated October 31, 1989; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2321, Revision 7, dated October 27, 2005; as applicable; to
perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise. (Only the first page of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2321, dated October 31, 1989, contains the document
issue date; no other page of this document contains this
information.) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of these documents in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207, for a copy
of this service information. You may review copies at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 8, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-19534 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P