Electronic Submission of Regulatory Information, and Creating an Electronic Platform for Enhanced Information Management; Public Hearing, 67356-67359 [06-9313]
Download as PDF
67356
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices
Implementation. ANA is proposing
three distinct priority areas within the
Native Language program area. The
proposed categories are:
Category I: Language Assessment will
remain as a 12-month project period
with the primary activity of assessing
the current status of the Native
Language for the identified Native
community.
Category II: Language Project Planning
will have up to 24-month project period
with the primary activity of planning a
Native Language project for the Native
community to be impacted by the
project.
Category III: Language Project
Implementation will have up to a 36month project period to support such
activities consistent with legislative and
regulatory requirements.
An award in Categories II and III is
not contingent upon having received
previous funding from ANA for
language preservation and maintenance;
however, current language-assessment
data and language-delivery methods
will need to be provided. (Legal
authority: Section 803(a) and (d) and
803C of the Native Americans Programs
Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
2991b and 2991b–c.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
III. Application—Project Development
During the FY 2006 competitions,
ANA participated in the electronic
application submission process. Based
upon this experience, ANA has
analyzed the submission procedure. To
eliminate future concerns with
uploading attachments, ANA has
determined that all applications (hardcopy and electronic) should be
submitted with no more than three (3)
objectives per 12-month budget period
for any given competition. This
limitation will still allow an applicant
to convey adequately the proposed
project goals, activities and results
expected. (Legal authority: Section 803
(a) and (d) and 803C of the Native
American Programs Act of 1974, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 2991b and 2991b–
3.)
IV. Special Initiative
Under legislative authority, ANA can
provide funding for Special Initiatives
that focus on specifically identified
needs within Native communities.
Applicants must submit projects that are
responsive to the specific competitive
program area. Last year ANA offered a
specific program announcement to fund
projects that support healthy families
titled, Improving the Well-Being of
Children—Native American Healthy
Marriage Initiative (NAHMI). This
Special Initiative will be supported
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Nov 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
again in FY 2007. Applicants requesting
funding for these types of initiatives
will need to submit projects under this
designated Special Initiative
competitive area only. (Legal authority:
Section 803 (a) and (d) and 803C of the
Native American Programs Act of 1974,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2991b and
2991b–3.
V. ANA Funding Restriction Policy
In order to ensure that ANA manages
proper fiscal responsibility in the
dispensing of Federal funds, a list of
actions and activities, which will not be
considered as eligible activities for
funding, is maintained. ANA has
observed that projects including such
contingency activities as permits,
licenses, outside or internal
certification, Federal or State agency
approvals, or project activities that are
contingent on the outcome of a court
decision, do not complete projects
within the approved project period. As
a result of these situation, grantees often
do not complete project objectives or
expend approved funding. Based upon
agency reviews and on-site visits, ANA
will implement the following new
funding restriction policy:
ANA will not consider projects that
contain contingency activities that impede or
indefinitely delay the ongoing progress of the
proposed project. Applicants must
demonstrate the project planning considered
potential contingency activities and provide
adequate assurance that such activities will
not impede the progress of the project. (Legal
authority: Section 803 (a) and (d) and 803C
of the Native American Programs Act of
1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2991b and
2991b–3.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
Sheila K. Cooper,
Director of Program Operations,
Administration for Native Americans.
[FR Doc. 06–9281 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006N–0464]
Electronic Submission of Regulatory
Information, and Creating an
Electronic Platform for Enhanced
Information Management; Public
Hearing
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public hearing; request
for comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public hearing to solicit general views
and information from interested persons
on issues concerning the electronic
submission of product information to
the agency. In particular, FDA is seeking
these views and information from
interested persons on the feasibility and
effect of an all-electronic submission
environment, as well as issues related to
an electronic regulatory information
exchange platform. To help solicit such
information and views, FDA is seeking
responses to specific questions (see
section IV of this document).
DATES: Public Hearing: The public
hearing will be held on December 18,
2006, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. However,
depending on the level of public
participation, the meeting may be
extended or may end early.
Registration and Participation:
Registration on the day of the public
hearing will be provided on a space
available basis beginning at 7:30 a.m.
Because seating is limited, we
recommend arriving early. See section I
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document for information
on how to participate in the meeting. If
you need special accommodations due
to a disability, please contact Paula S.
McKeever (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) at least 7 days in advance.
Comments: Submit written or
electronic notices of participation and
comments by December 8, 2006. The
administrative record of the hearing will
remain open to receive additional
comments until February 16, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be
held at the Advisors and Consultants
Staff Conference Room, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857. Additional
information on parking and public
transportation may be accessed at https://
www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/
criticalpath/.
Submit written notices of
participation and comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20857. Submit electronic notices of
participation and comments to https://
www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/oc/
dockets/comments/commentdocket.cfm.
Identify all submissions to the docket
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula S. McKeever, Office of Critical
Path Programs (HF–18), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm.
14B–45, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
1520, paula.mckeever@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices
I. How to Participate in the Meeting
The procedures governing the hearing
are set forth in part 15 (21 CFR part 15)
of FDA’s regulations. If you wish to
make an oral presentation during the
hearing, you must submit a written
notice of participation with the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
by December 8, 2006. In the written
notice, submit your name, title, business
affiliation, address, telephone number,
fax number, and e-mail address. You
should also submit a written statement
for each discussion topic in section IV
of this document that you intend to
address, or other pertinent information
related to the topic in your presentation,
the names and addresses of all
individuals that plan to participate, and
the approximate time requested for your
presentation. We encourage individuals
and organizations with common
interests to consolidate or coordinate
their presentations to allow adequate
time for each request for presentation.
Participants should submit to the docket
two copies of each presentation.
We will file the hearing schedule
indicating the order of presentation and
the time allotted to each person with the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). We will also mail or
telephone the schedule to each
participant before the hearing. In
anticipation of the hearing presentations
moving ahead of schedule, participants
are encouraged to arrive early to ensure
their designated order of presentation.
Participants who are not present when
called, risk forfeiting their scheduled
time.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
II. Background
Over the past decade, we have been
moving toward transforming all
regulatory submissions from paper to
electronic means. To meet this goal, we
have taken the following steps:
• Issued regulations related to
voluntary electronic submission of
regulatory information and provided a
docket listing all submissions that we
accept electronically (e.g., electronic
records and electronic signatures, 21
CFR part 11; docket 92S–0251; https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/
92s0251/92s0251.htm);
• Issued regulations requiring or
proposing to require electronic
submission of certain regulatory
information (e.g., the electronic
submission of the content of labeling
(December 11, 2003; 68 FR 69009), and
manufacturer registration and listing of
drug products (August 29, 2006; 71 FR
51275));
• Issued numerous guidance
documents to assist in the submission of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Nov 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
various regulatory documents in
electronic format (e.g., electronic
common technical document, certain
premarket applications, and
postmarketing information; see https://
www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/
index.htm#electronic%20submissions);
• Issued notices related to electronic
submission (e.g., availability of the FDA
electronic submissions gateway (https://
www.fda.gov/esg/default.htm)); and
• Collaborated with manufacturers,
health care information suppliers, and
other government agencies to develop
data standards, and to build databases
for sharing certain clinical trial
information.
Now that we have accomplished these
preliminary steps, we are considering
technological and other feasibility
issues related to the electronic
submission of premarket applications to
FDA , as well as the electronic
submission of other regulatory
information (e.g., postmarketing
information and amendments to
applications).
Facilitating electronic submissions
and the electronic availability of
product information would promote
patient safety and better health
outcomes, speed development of new
medical technology, and allow health
care professionals and consumers to
make well informed decisions regarding
the use of medical products. Such
facilitations of electronic submissions
would also support the Secretary’s
health IT priorities to harness
information technology to improve
healthcare and patient safety.
As we work towards establishing a
modern, paperless submission
environment, we have also become
aware of the potential benefits of a
common electronic platform that could
be administered by a third party entity
or entities (e.g. private or nonprofit
entities not otherwise engaged in
clinical research activities) with
relevant expertise and organizational
leadership to facilitate, coordinate and
manage the functions necessary for
electronic submissions. For example, a
third party entity might perform the
following tasks:
• Build an electronic platform,
• Maintain data warehouses,
• Transition existing electronic data
and information repositories to the
electronic platform,
• Produce other necessary
components to facilitate electronic
access and management of information,
• Manage and support these
functions.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67357
III. Purpose and Scope of the Hearing
The purpose of this public hearing is
to provide stakeholders the opportunity
to address specific topics (see section IV
of this document) and present their
views, recommendations, and any other
pertinent information related to the
scope of this public hearing.
The scope of this public hearing
includes the following three issues:
• Feasibility issues related to the
electronic submission of premarket
applications, including the effects on
stakeholders of such actions;
• Feasibility issues related to
electronic submissions of other
regulatory information, e.g.,
postmarketing information and
amendments to applications; and
• Issues related to the concept and
feasibility of an electronic platform that
would facilitate the exchange of clinical
research information and other
regulatory product information, the role
of a public private partnership in the
creation and assessment of such a
platform, and the management of the
platform after its creation by a private
entity or entities with the relevant
technological expertise.
IV. Issues for Discussion
A. Electronic Submissions
We are specifically interested in
hearing comments regarding the
following questions and any other
pertinent information related to the
feasibility of the electronic submission
of premarket applications and other
regulatory information:
1. Transition From Paper Submissions
to Electronic Submissions
• Since January 1999, we have
accepted the voluntary electronic
submission of certain premarket
applications. If you are not voluntarily
submitting such applications
electronically, what is the reason(s)?
• Are you electronically submitting
any portion of your premarket
application? Is the portion specific to
product type or premarket application?
• What are the major impediments to
an all-electronic submission
environment?
• How can FDA best address these
impediments?
• Are there certain types of premarket
applications or portions of applications
that would be more difficult to submit
electronically? Why?
• Are there specific issues related to
electronic submission of premarket
applications that are unique to small
companies, academic institutions, and
government agencies? If so, what are
they and why are they unique?
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
67358
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices
• In addition to the sponsors of
premarket applications, are there other
sectors of FDA regulated industry that
would have to make adjustments in
business practices in an all-electronic
submission environment? Please
describe any such adjustments.
• In your opinion, what internal
expertise is needed for firms to make the
transition to an all-electronic premarket
submission? Do firms have this
expertise?
• Is the labor market ready to
accommodate industry’s demand for
such expertise to convert applications in
an all-electronic submission
environment?
• Are there enough entities available
to provide such services or tools in
support of this effort? If not, how long
would it take for these services to
become available?
• How would an all-electronic
submission environment benefit you?
• Would an all-electronic submission
environment change your ability to
initiate in a timely manner the studies
supporting your regulatory submission?
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2. Cost
• What do you estimate as the cost
burden to you if all premarket
applications and related documents are
submitted electronically? What is the
breakdown of the cost (e.g., software,
programming, hardware, training)?
• Would these costs differ depending
on the type of entity providing services
related to the application (e.g., sponsor,
clinical research organization, U.S.
agent)?
• What additional costs are associated
with implementing a particular format
or standard for an electronic premarket
submission?
• Once the appropriate systems and
processes are in place, and excluding
startup costs, what would be the costs
associated with providing an all-paper
submission compared to an allelectronic submission?
• Are there parts of a product
application that are more costly to
convert to an electronic format than
others?
3. Time
• Based on your current method of
preparation to submit applications, how
much time would be required for
preparation to submit the entire
application in an electronic format; or a
portion by an entity providing services
related to the application?
• How long would it take you to
prepare and submit an application
electronically under the current format
accepted by FDA for voluntary
submissions?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 Nov 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
• How much time would you need to
make a smooth transition to a new
electronic system?
• How would your estimated time
differ for various product types or
applications?
4. Implementation
• Should we consider an incremental
phase-in implementation strategy for an
all-electronic submission environment?
Is so, what should the strategy include?
What is the order of priorities for
phasing in implementation?
• What steps can we take to minimize
the cost or other burdens of
transitioning to an all-electronic
submission environment?
• What additional standards or
revisions to current electronic standards
would be helpful to make electronic
submissions work?
• Are the tools and formats currently
available for FDA electronic
submissions adequate? If not, why?
What is needed?
• Are there other submission
mechanisms more suitable and
beneficial than what is currently
available (e.g., the electronic submission
gateway)?
• Are there factors, such as data
formats or tools, for harmonization with
other government entities, the private
sector, or foreign regulatory authorities
that could reduce costs or increase the
benefits of electronic submissions?
• Would issuing guidance be useful
in helping with the transition? If so,
what topics would you like addressed?
B. Third Party Entities
As previously described in section II
of this document, we are considering
issues related to the concept and
feasibility of an electronic platform that
would facilitate the exchange of clinical
research information and other
regulatory product information, and the
role of a public private partnership in
the creation and assessment of such a
platform. In addition, we are
considering whether the functions of the
platform could be assumed by a private
entity or entities with the relevant
technological expertise. Therefore, we
are interested in hearing your
presentation on the following questions.
• What are your general viewpoints
on a third party entity or entities
providing services related to such an
electronic platform?
• What are your views on the
establishment of a public-private
partnership to initiate formation of an
electronic platform?
• How do you envision the business
process modeling and nature of the
third party entity or entities?
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• What are the necessary attributes
and characteristics of the third party
entity or entities?
• What services could the third party
entity or entities provide?
• What collaborative efforts by FDA
with a third party entity would be
beneficial to establish services?
V. Notice of Hearing Under 21 CFR Part
15
The Acting Commissioner of Food
and Drugs (the Acting Commissioner) is
announcing that the public hearing will
be held in accordance with part 15 (21
CFR part 15). The hearing will be
conducted by a presiding officer, who
will be accompanied by FDA senior
management from the Office of the
Commissioner, the Office of Policy and
Planning, the Office of the Chief
Counsel; and by senior management
from the National Institutes of Health,
particularly the National Cancer
Institute.
Persons who wish to participate in the
part 15 hearing must file a written or
electronic notice of participation with
the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES and DATES). To ensure
timely handling, any outer envelope
should be clearly marked with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document, along with
the statement ‘‘Electronic Submission of
Regulatory Information, and Creating an
Electronic Platform for Enhanced
Information Management.’’ Requests to
make a presentation should contain the
potential presenter’s name and title;
address; telephone and fax number; email address; affiliation, if any; the
sponsor of the presentation (e.g., the
organization paying travel expenses or
fees), if any; and a brief summary of the
presentation (including the discussion
topic(s) that will be addressed).
Under § 15.30(f), the hearing is
informal, and the rules of evidence do
not apply. No participant may interrupt
the presentation of another participant.
Only the presiding officer and panel
members may question any person
during or at the conclusion of each
presentation.
Public hearings under part 15 are
subject to FDA’s policy and procedures
for electronic media coverage of FDA’s
public administrative proceedings (part
10, subpart C (21 CFR part 10, subpart
C)). Under § 10.205, representatives of
the electronic media may be permitted,
subject to certain limitations, to
videotape, film, or otherwise record
FDA’s public administrative
proceedings, including presentations by
participants.
To the extent that the conditions for
the hearing, as described in this
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 21, 2006 / Notices
document, conflict with any provisions
set out in part 15, this document acts as
a waiver of those provisions as specified
in § 15.30(h).
VI. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic notices
of participation and comments for
consideration. To permit time for all
interested persons to submit data,
information, or views on this subject,
the administrative record of the hearing
will remain open until February 16,
2007. Persons who wish to provide
additional materials for consideration
should file these materials with the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). You should annotate and
organize your comments to identify the
specific questions identified by topic to
which they refer (see section IV of this
document). Two paper copies of any
mailed comments are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number at the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
VII. Transcripts
The hearing will be transcribed as
stipulated in § 15.30(b). Transcripts of
the hearing will be available for review
at the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) and on the Internet at
https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets
approximately 21 days after the hearing.
You may place orders for copies of the
transcript through the Freedom of
Information Office (HFI–35), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers lane,
rm. 6–30, Rockville, MD 20857, at a cost
of 10 cents per page.
Dated: November 15, 2006.
Janet Woodcock,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 06–9313 Filed 11–16–06; 2:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
National Center for Research
Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the following
meeting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 Nov 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Center for
Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel;
RCMI Teleconference (II).
Date: December 6, 2006.
Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, One
Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone
Conference Call).
Contact Person: Guo Zhang, PhD, MPH,
Scientific Review Administrator, Office of
Review, National Center for Research
Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701
Democracy Boulevard, 1 Democracy Plaza,
Room 1064, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
0812, zhanggu@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure,
93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health,
HHS)
Dated: November 14, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06–9320 Filed 11–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the following
meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67359
Name of Committee: National Eye Institute
Special Emphasis Panel; NEI K’s, R24’s and
R34’s.
Date: December 8, 2006.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW.,
Washington, DC 20015.
Contact Person: Samuel Rawlings, PhD,
Chief, Scientific Review Branch, Division of
Extramural Research, National Eye Institute,
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300,
Bethesda, MD 20892–9300, 301–451–2020,
rawlings@nei.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: November 15, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06–9300 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of a meeting of the
Board of Scientific Counselors, National
Eye Institute.
The meeting will be closed to the
public as indicated below in accordance
with the provisions set forth in section
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended
for the review, discussion, and
evaluation of individual grant
applications conducted by the National
Eye Institute, including consideration of
personnel qualifications and
performance, and the competence of
individual investigators, the disclosure
of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
Name of Committee: Board of Scientific
Counselors, National Eye Institute.
Date: December 3–5, 2006.
Time: 7 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate personal
qualifications and performance, and
competence of individual investigators.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Room 6,
Bethesda, MD 20892.
Contact Person: Sheldon S Miller, PhD,
Scientific Director, National Institutes of
Health, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD
20892, (301) 451–6763.
In the interest of security, NIH has
instituted stringent procedures for entrance
onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles,
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67356-67359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9313]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006N-0464]
Electronic Submission of Regulatory Information, and Creating an
Electronic Platform for Enhanced Information Management; Public Hearing
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
hearing to solicit general views and information from interested
persons on issues concerning the electronic submission of product
information to the agency. In particular, FDA is seeking these views
and information from interested persons on the feasibility and effect
of an all-electronic submission environment, as well as issues related
to an electronic regulatory information exchange platform. To help
solicit such information and views, FDA is seeking responses to
specific questions (see section IV of this document).
DATES: Public Hearing: The public hearing will be held on December 18,
2006, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. However, depending on the level of public
participation, the meeting may be extended or may end early.
Registration and Participation: Registration on the day of the
public hearing will be provided on a space available basis beginning at
7:30 a.m. Because seating is limited, we recommend arriving early. See
section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document for
information on how to participate in the meeting. If you need special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Paula S. McKeever
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 days in advance.
Comments: Submit written or electronic notices of participation and
comments by December 8, 2006. The administrative record of the hearing
will remain open to receive additional comments until February 16,
2007.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held at the Advisors and
Consultants Staff Conference Room, Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Additional information on parking
and public transportation may be accessed at https://www.fda.gov/oc/
initiatives/ criticalpath/.
Submit written notices of participation and comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20857. Submit electronic
notices of participation and comments to https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
scripts/oc/dockets/comments/commentdocket.cfm. Identify all submissions
to the docket with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula S. McKeever, Office of Critical
Path Programs (HF-18), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
rm. 14B-45, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1520,
paula.mckeever@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 67357]]
I. How to Participate in the Meeting
The procedures governing the hearing are set forth in part 15 (21
CFR part 15) of FDA's regulations. If you wish to make an oral
presentation during the hearing, you must submit a written notice of
participation with the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
by December 8, 2006. In the written notice, submit your name, title,
business affiliation, address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail
address. You should also submit a written statement for each discussion
topic in section IV of this document that you intend to address, or
other pertinent information related to the topic in your presentation,
the names and addresses of all individuals that plan to participate,
and the approximate time requested for your presentation. We encourage
individuals and organizations with common interests to consolidate or
coordinate their presentations to allow adequate time for each request
for presentation. Participants should submit to the docket two copies
of each presentation.
We will file the hearing schedule indicating the order of
presentation and the time allotted to each person with the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). We will also mail or telephone the
schedule to each participant before the hearing. In anticipation of the
hearing presentations moving ahead of schedule, participants are
encouraged to arrive early to ensure their designated order of
presentation. Participants who are not present when called, risk
forfeiting their scheduled time.
II. Background
Over the past decade, we have been moving toward transforming all
regulatory submissions from paper to electronic means. To meet this
goal, we have taken the following steps:
Issued regulations related to voluntary electronic
submission of regulatory information and provided a docket listing all
submissions that we accept electronically (e.g., electronic records and
electronic signatures, 21 CFR part 11; docket 92S-0251; https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/92s0251/92s0251.htm);
Issued regulations requiring or proposing to require
electronic submission of certain regulatory information (e.g., the
electronic submission of the content of labeling (December 11, 2003; 68
FR 69009), and manufacturer registration and listing of drug products
(August 29, 2006; 71 FR 51275));
Issued numerous guidance documents to assist in the
submission of various regulatory documents in electronic format (e.g.,
electronic common technical document, certain premarket applications,
and postmarketing information; see https://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/
index.htm#electronic%20submissions);
Issued notices related to electronic submission (e.g.,
availability of the FDA electronic submissions gateway (https://
www.fda.gov/esg/default.htm)); and
Collaborated with manufacturers, health care information
suppliers, and other government agencies to develop data standards, and
to build databases for sharing certain clinical trial information.
Now that we have accomplished these preliminary steps, we are
considering technological and other feasibility issues related to the
electronic submission of premarket applications to FDA , as well as the
electronic submission of other regulatory information (e.g.,
postmarketing information and amendments to applications).
Facilitating electronic submissions and the electronic availability
of product information would promote patient safety and better health
outcomes, speed development of new medical technology, and allow health
care professionals and consumers to make well informed decisions
regarding the use of medical products. Such facilitations of electronic
submissions would also support the Secretary's health IT priorities to
harness information technology to improve healthcare and patient
safety.
As we work towards establishing a modern, paperless submission
environment, we have also become aware of the potential benefits of a
common electronic platform that could be administered by a third party
entity or entities (e.g. private or nonprofit entities not otherwise
engaged in clinical research activities) with relevant expertise and
organizational leadership to facilitate, coordinate and manage the
functions necessary for electronic submissions. For example, a third
party entity might perform the following tasks:
Build an electronic platform,
Maintain data warehouses,
Transition existing electronic data and information
repositories to the electronic platform,
Produce other necessary components to facilitate
electronic access and management of information,
Manage and support these functions.
III. Purpose and Scope of the Hearing
The purpose of this public hearing is to provide stakeholders the
opportunity to address specific topics (see section IV of this
document) and present their views, recommendations, and any other
pertinent information related to the scope of this public hearing.
The scope of this public hearing includes the following three
issues:
Feasibility issues related to the electronic submission of
premarket applications, including the effects on stakeholders of such
actions;
Feasibility issues related to electronic submissions of
other regulatory information, e.g., postmarketing information and
amendments to applications; and
Issues related to the concept and feasibility of an
electronic platform that would facilitate the exchange of clinical
research information and other regulatory product information, the role
of a public private partnership in the creation and assessment of such
a platform, and the management of the platform after its creation by a
private entity or entities with the relevant technological expertise.
IV. Issues for Discussion
A. Electronic Submissions
We are specifically interested in hearing comments regarding the
following questions and any other pertinent information related to the
feasibility of the electronic submission of premarket applications and
other regulatory information:
1. Transition From Paper Submissions to Electronic Submissions
Since January 1999, we have accepted the voluntary
electronic submission of certain premarket applications. If you are not
voluntarily submitting such applications electronically, what is the
reason(s)?
Are you electronically submitting any portion of your
premarket application? Is the portion specific to product type or
premarket application?
What are the major impediments to an all-electronic
submission environment?
How can FDA best address these impediments?
Are there certain types of premarket applications or
portions of applications that would be more difficult to submit
electronically? Why?
Are there specific issues related to electronic submission
of premarket applications that are unique to small companies, academic
institutions, and government agencies? If so, what are they and why are
they unique?
[[Page 67358]]
In addition to the sponsors of premarket applications, are
there other sectors of FDA regulated industry that would have to make
adjustments in business practices in an all-electronic submission
environment? Please describe any such adjustments.
In your opinion, what internal expertise is needed for
firms to make the transition to an all-electronic premarket submission?
Do firms have this expertise?
Is the labor market ready to accommodate industry's demand
for such expertise to convert applications in an all-electronic
submission environment?
Are there enough entities available to provide such
services or tools in support of this effort? If not, how long would it
take for these services to become available?
How would an all-electronic submission environment benefit
you?
Would an all-electronic submission environment change your
ability to initiate in a timely manner the studies supporting your
regulatory submission?
2. Cost
What do you estimate as the cost burden to you if all
premarket applications and related documents are submitted
electronically? What is the breakdown of the cost (e.g., software,
programming, hardware, training)?
Would these costs differ depending on the type of entity
providing services related to the application (e.g., sponsor, clinical
research organization, U.S. agent)?
What additional costs are associated with implementing a
particular format or standard for an electronic premarket submission?
Once the appropriate systems and processes are in place,
and excluding startup costs, what would be the costs associated with
providing an all-paper submission compared to an all-electronic
submission?
Are there parts of a product application that are more
costly to convert to an electronic format than others?
3. Time
Based on your current method of preparation to submit
applications, how much time would be required for preparation to submit
the entire application in an electronic format; or a portion by an
entity providing services related to the application?
How long would it take you to prepare and submit an
application electronically under the current format accepted by FDA for
voluntary submissions?
How much time would you need to make a smooth transition
to a new electronic system?
How would your estimated time differ for various product
types or applications?
4. Implementation
Should we consider an incremental phase-in implementation
strategy for an all-electronic submission environment? Is so, what
should the strategy include? What is the order of priorities for
phasing in implementation?
What steps can we take to minimize the cost or other
burdens of transitioning to an all-electronic submission environment?
What additional standards or revisions to current
electronic standards would be helpful to make electronic submissions
work?
Are the tools and formats currently available for FDA
electronic submissions adequate? If not, why? What is needed?
Are there other submission mechanisms more suitable and
beneficial than what is currently available (e.g., the electronic
submission gateway)?
Are there factors, such as data formats or tools, for
harmonization with other government entities, the private sector, or
foreign regulatory authorities that could reduce costs or increase the
benefits of electronic submissions?
Would issuing guidance be useful in helping with the
transition? If so, what topics would you like addressed?
B. Third Party Entities
As previously described in section II of this document, we are
considering issues related to the concept and feasibility of an
electronic platform that would facilitate the exchange of clinical
research information and other regulatory product information, and the
role of a public private partnership in the creation and assessment of
such a platform. In addition, we are considering whether the functions
of the platform could be assumed by a private entity or entities with
the relevant technological expertise. Therefore, we are interested in
hearing your presentation on the following questions.
What are your general viewpoints on a third party entity
or entities providing services related to such an electronic platform?
What are your views on the establishment of a public-
private partnership to initiate formation of an electronic platform?
How do you envision the business process modeling and
nature of the third party entity or entities?
What are the necessary attributes and characteristics of
the third party entity or entities?
What services could the third party entity or entities
provide?
What collaborative efforts by FDA with a third party
entity would be beneficial to establish services?
V. Notice of Hearing Under 21 CFR Part 15
The Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Acting Commissioner)
is announcing that the public hearing will be held in accordance with
part 15 (21 CFR part 15). The hearing will be conducted by a presiding
officer, who will be accompanied by FDA senior management from the
Office of the Commissioner, the Office of Policy and Planning, the
Office of the Chief Counsel; and by senior management from the National
Institutes of Health, particularly the National Cancer Institute.
Persons who wish to participate in the part 15 hearing must file a
written or electronic notice of participation with the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES and DATES). To ensure timely
handling, any outer envelope should be clearly marked with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document, along with
the statement ``Electronic Submission of Regulatory Information, and
Creating an Electronic Platform for Enhanced Information Management.''
Requests to make a presentation should contain the potential
presenter's name and title; address; telephone and fax number; e-mail
address; affiliation, if any; the sponsor of the presentation (e.g.,
the organization paying travel expenses or fees), if any; and a brief
summary of the presentation (including the discussion topic(s) that
will be addressed).
Under Sec. 15.30(f), the hearing is informal, and the rules of
evidence do not apply. No participant may interrupt the presentation of
another participant. Only the presiding officer and panel members may
question any person during or at the conclusion of each presentation.
Public hearings under part 15 are subject to FDA's policy and
procedures for electronic media coverage of FDA's public administrative
proceedings (part 10, subpart C (21 CFR part 10, subpart C)). Under
Sec. 10.205, representatives of the electronic media may be permitted,
subject to certain limitations, to videotape, film, or otherwise record
FDA's public administrative proceedings, including presentations by
participants.
To the extent that the conditions for the hearing, as described in
this
[[Page 67359]]
document, conflict with any provisions set out in part 15, this
document acts as a waiver of those provisions as specified in Sec.
15.30(h).
VI. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic notices of participation and
comments for consideration. To permit time for all interested persons
to submit data, information, or views on this subject, the
administrative record of the hearing will remain open until February
16, 2007. Persons who wish to provide additional materials for
consideration should file these materials with the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES). You should annotate and organize your
comments to identify the specific questions identified by topic to
which they refer (see section IV of this document). Two paper copies of
any mailed comments are to be submitted, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket
number at the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen
in Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
VII. Transcripts
The hearing will be transcribed as stipulated in Sec. 15.30(b).
Transcripts of the hearing will be available for review at the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) and on the Internet at https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets approximately 21 days after the hearing. You
may place orders for copies of the transcript through the Freedom of
Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
lane, rm. 6-30, Rockville, MD 20857, at a cost of 10 cents per page.
Dated: November 15, 2006.
Janet Woodcock,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 06-9313 Filed 11-16-06; 2:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S