Implementation of the Pilot Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program; Request for Comment, 67121-67124 [E6-19574]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the OEI Docket in the EPA Headquarters
Docket Center.
Dated: November 13, 2006.
Peter W. Preuss,
Director, National Center for Environmental
Assessment.
[FR Doc. E6–19558 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0341; FRL–8057–1]
Implementation of the Pilot Voluntary
Children’s Chemical Evaluation
Program; Request for Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is requesting comment
on the implementation of the pilot
phase of the Voluntary Children’s
Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP).
VCCEP was designed to collect health
effects, exposure, and risk information
on chemicals to which children are
likely to be exposed, and to make that
information available to the public so
the public may better understand the
potential health risks to children
associated with certain chemical
exposures. EPA announced the program
in December 2000 and the pilot began
in 2001 when companies volunteered to
sponsor their chemicals under VCCEP.
At what is approximately the midpoint
in the implementation of the pilot phase
of VCCEP, EPA is preparing to evaluate
how well it is meeting its objectives for
VCCEP. To this end, EPA is seeking
comments from participants and
observers about the operations and
experience under the VCCEP pilot to
this point. If requested, EPA will hold
a public meeting to take comment on
the implementation of the pilot phase of
VCCEP.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 19, 2007.
Requests for a public meeting must be
received on or before December 11,
2006.
To submit comments:
Submit your comments, identified by
docket identification (ID) number EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2006–0341, by one of the
following methods.
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East, Rm.
6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0341.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2006–0341. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67121
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC).
The EPA/DC suffered structural damage
due to flooding in June 2006. Although
the EPA/DC is continuing operations,
there will be temporary changes to the
EPA/DC during the clean-up. The EPA/
DC Public Reading Room, which was
temporarily closed due to flooding, has
been relocated in the EPA Headquarters
Library, Infoterra Room (Room Number
3334) in EPA West, located at 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number of the
EPA/DC Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OPPT Docket is (202) 566–0280.
EPA visitors are required to show
photographic identification and sign the
EPA visitor log. Visitors to the EPA/DC
Public Reading Room will be provided
with an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times while in the EPA
Building and returned to the guard upon
departure. In addition, security
personnel will escort visitors to and
from the new EPA/DC Public Reading
Room location. Up-to-date information
about the EPA/DC is on the EPA website
at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.
To request a public meeting: Submit
your request, identified by docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0341, to
Catherine Roman by one of the
following methods:
• E-mail address:
roman.catherine@epa.gov.
• Mail: Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001, ATTN:
Catherine Roman.
• Hand Delivery: 1201 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC, EPA East,
ATTN: Catherine Roman. Ask the
reception desk to call (202) 564–4780.
Such deliveries should be made during
normal working hours, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
67122
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
number: (202) 554–1404; e-mail address:
TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact:
Catherine Roman, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (202) 564–
4780; e-mail address:
roman.catherine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of particular interest to those chemical
manufacturers (including importers)
who produce or import chemical
substances that are subject to the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA),
individuals or groups concerned with
chemical testing and children’s health,
and animal welfare groups. Because
other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at the
estimate.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggested
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA is requesting comment from
stakeholders, interested parties, and the
general public on the implementation of
the VCCEP pilot and is also evaluating
the progress of the VCCEP pilot toward
meeting its objectives. VCCEP was
designed to collect health effects,
exposure, and risk information on
chemicals to which children are likely
to be exposed, and to make that
information available to the public so
the public may better understand the
potential health risks to children
associated with certain chemical
exposures, and to allow EPA and others
to evaluate the risks of these chemicals
so that mitigation measures may be
taken as appropriate.
EPA announced VCCEP in a
December 26, 2000 Federal Register
notice (Ref. 1) and requested chemical
manufacturers and importers to
participate in a VCCEP pilot by
voluntarily committing to sponsor an
information collection on 23 chemicals.
The VCCEP pilot is intended to allow
EPA to gain insight as to how best to
design and implement VCCEP in order
to effectively provide the Agency and
the public with the means to understand
the potential health risks to children
associated with exposure to chemicals
to which children may be exposed. EPA
intends the VCCEP pilot to be the means
of identifying efficiencies which can be
applied to the subsequent
implementation of VCCEP.
Several factors were considered in
selecting the 23 chemicals for the
VCCEP pilot; they included substantial
production/importation (one million
lbs. or more per year), presence in the
environment, and biomonitoring
evidence of presence in humans. A
detailed description of the selection
process used by EPA is in the document
entitled Methodology for Selecting
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Chemicals for the Voluntary Children’s
Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP)
Pilot (Ref. 2).
The requested commitment for the
VCCEP pilot was for Tier 1 information,
with the potential for EPA to request
participants to make additional
commitments to Tier 2 and Tier 3
information based on an evaluation of
the Tier 1 submission. As part of their
Tier 1 commitments, sponsors were
asked to include an expected
submission date that, as described in the
December 2000 notice, is based on the
amount of time EPA considered
necessary to gather the information (or
perform testing, if necessary) and
prepare the assessments. Other guidance
on timeliness provided in the December
2000 notice included the following:
• Within 6 months from the
publication of the December 2000 notice
was the recommended deadline to
commit to Tier 1.
• Within 4 months after announcing
EPA’s Data Needs Decision was the
recommended deadline to commit to
upper tiers.
• Within 1 month after receiving a
chemical assessment was EPA’s goal to
make it publicly available on the VCCEP
website.
During 2001, 35 companies and 10
consortia voluntarily committed to
sponsor 20 of the 23 chemicals in the
VCCEP pilot. Three of the twenty-three
chemicals were not sponsored and
remain unsponsored. Also in 2001, EPA
arranged for a third party, Toxicology
for Excellence in Risk Assessment
(TERA), to organize and facilitate public
Peer Consultation meetings to evaluate
the chemical assessments to be
submitted by the chemical sponsors. At
a Peer Consultation meeting, a panel of
scientific experts with extensive and
broad experience in toxicity testing,
exposure evaluation, or the specific
chemical discuss the chemical
assessment and offer their opinions on
its adequacy and possible additional
data needs. This discussion is held at a
public meeting where interested parties
may also present comments. TERA
prepares a report summarizing the
opinions expressed at the public
meeting and submits this report to EPA.
EPA considers this report when it
reviews the chemical assessment prior
to forming its decision regarding
additional data needs of the chemical.
In terms of progress, by the end of
August 2006, the VCCEP pilot sponsors
had submitted Tier 1 chemical
assessments for 12 of the 20 chemicals;
all 12 chemical assessments had been
evaluated in public Peer Consultation
meetings; summary reports of the Peer
Consultation meetings for the 12
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
chemical assessments were made
available; and EPA had reviewed the
Peer Consultation reports and issued
Data Needs Decisions for 6 of the 12
chemicals. EPA is in the process of
developing Data Needs Decisions for the
remaining 6 chemicals.
In its six Data Needs Decisions, EPA
decided that additional data were
needed for three chemicals. A
consortium of three companies
organized by the American Chemistry
Council (ACC) has agreed to proceed to
Tier 2 of the VCCEP pilot and sponsor
the additional information collection for
one of the chemicals. The Tier 1 sponsor
of the other two chemicals with
additional data needs informed the
Agency that it will not commit to
participate in Tier 2 for those chemicals.
For the other three chemicals for which
Data Needs Decisions have been issued,
EPA concluded that the Tier 1
assessments provide sufficient
information to adequately characterize
the risk to children of exposure to those
chemicals, and EPA considers the
evaluation of these three chemicals to be
completed for purposes of the VCCEP
pilot. To summarize the activity and
progress of the VCCEP pilot through
August 2006, the table in this unit
indicates how many chemicals have
completed successive stages in the
VCCEP pilot:
Stages in the VCCEP
Process
Number of
chemicals
which have
completed
each stage
20
Tier 1 chemical assessment
submitted
12 *
Tier 1 chemical assessment
has gone through Peer
Consultation
12
Peer Consultation report
available
12
EPA issued a Data Needs
Decision
(3 chemicals had Tier 2 data
needs, 3 chemicals did
not have Tier 2 data
needs.)
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Sponsor commitment to provide Tier 1 information
6
Received a sponsor commitment to provide Tier 2 information
OR
1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
Number of
chemicals
which have
completed
each stage
Stages in the VCCEP
Process
Agency informed it will not
receive sponsor commitment to provide Tier 2 information
2
* As noted on the VCCEP website, the submission of chemical assessments for four
chemicals (ethylbenzene, ethylene dichloride,
perchloroethylene, and trichloroethylene) has
been delayed due to other commitments to
develop the data as part of another effort or
program.
The most recent information on the
progress of specific chemicals in the
VCCEP pilot is presented on the VCCEP
website (https://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/
vccep). Since the Fall of 2001, EPA has
kept the public informed of activities in
the VCCEP pilot through the VCCEP
website. The website describes VCCEP
and how it was developed. It also lists
the chemicals and their sponsors, the
date of sponsor commitments to each
tier, the submission dates of chemical
assessments, the dates of upcoming
public Peer Consultation meetings, and
the completion dates of Peer
Consultation reports and EPA’s Data
Needs Decisions. Most importantly, the
website makes the cited information
available to the public by providing
links to the chemical assessments, the
Peer Consultation reports, and EPA’s
Data Needs Decisions.
In terms of timeliness for EPA, TERA,
and the sponsors meeting the scheduled
goals for the VCCEP pilot, the following
observations are made:
• All sponsors committed to Tier 1 by
the 6–month deadline.
• As part of their Tier 1
commitments, the sponsors for 5 of the
12 chemicals for which EPA has
received a chemical assessment as of
August 2006, provided a projected
submission date for their Tier 1
chemical assessment. The chemical
assessment for only one of the five
chemicals (decabromodiphenyl ether)
was received by EPA by the projected
submission date.
• Some of the projected submission
dates originally provided by the
sponsors were subsequently revised at
the request of the sponsor, or due to
TERA scheduling of Peer Consultation
meetings.
• EPA made all the chemical
assessments available on the VCCEP
website within 1 month of receipt.
• Although a recommended deadline
for scheduling the Peer Consultation
meetings was not specified in the
December 2000 notice, the meetings for
the 12 chemicals for which EPA has
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67123
received a chemical assessment as of
August 2006 were held within an
average of 2.4 months of receiving the
chemical assessment.
• Although a recommended deadline
for TERA to issue its report
summarizing a Peer Consultation
meeting was not specified in the
December 2000 notice, TERA issued its
reports for the 12 chemicals for which
EPA has received a chemical assessment
as of August 2006, within an average of
4.1 months after each meeting.
The notice announcing VCCEP (Ref. 1,
p. 81714) stated that EPA expected to
evaluate the VCCEP pilot at 3 and 6
years after its initiation. EPA chose not
to conduct an evaluation at 3 years
because a sufficient number of
chemicals had not gone through the
public Peer Consultation process and, as
a consequence of this, there was
insufficient information to prepare a
useful evaluation. Consequently, EPA
decided to conduct a single evaluation
at a point 5 years, approximately
midway, into the program (i.e., 2006).
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
Congress gave EPA the authority to
implement TSCA for the purpose of
protecting human health and the
environment, in part, by requiring
testing and, if necessary, by restricting
the manufacture, processing,
distribution in commerce, use, or
disposal of certain chemical substances.
VCCEP is a voluntary program which
focuses on collecting information and
developing data necessary to protect
children from risks associated with
chemical substances to which they are
likely to be exposed. This notice seeks
public involvement in a midpoint
evaluation of how the VCCEP pilot is
meeting its objectives and the overall
objectives of VCCEP.
III. Request for Comment
EPA is requesting comment from
stakeholders, interested parties, and the
general public on the implementation of
the VCCEP pilot, what modifications
might be made to make the VCCEP pilot
run more efficiently, and how well the
VCCEP pilot is meeting the objectives of
VCCEP. The main objectives of VCCEP
are:
• To collect exposure, hazard, and
risk information on chemicals to which
children are likely to be exposed.
• To make the information available
to the public so the public may better
understand the potential health risks to
children associated with certain
chemical exposures.
The Agency is particularly interested
in receiving your feedback with regard
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
67124
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
to the list of questions in this Unit III.
Commenters should not feel that they
must confine their comments to the
following specific questions, nor should
they feel they must respond to any or all
of the questions. Commenters, however,
should attempt to provide comments on
the aspects of the VCCEP pilot with
which they have had experience and/or
have formed a definite opinion. To be
most helpful in the Agency’s evaluation,
please provide enough detail to explain
or illustrate conclusions that you have
reached based on your experiences.
• Have the hazard, exposure, and
risk assessments submitted by the
sponsors provided sufficient
information to enable the Peer
Consultation panel to adequately
evaluate these aspects as they relate to
children from the chemicals in
question? Have the Data Needs
Assessments prepared by the sponsors
been fair and unbiased?
• Has the Peer Consultation process
been open, transparent, timely, and
useful as a forum for scientists and
experts from various stakeholder groups
to exchange views on sponsors’
assessments and recommended data
needs? How might it be improved?
• Has the Peer Consultation process
been efficient? If not, what
improvements could be made?
• Has the Peer Consultation panel
adequately considered both toxicology
and exposure information in developing
its results?
• Does the Peer Consultation process
provide a scientifically rigorous and
effective means for eliciting comments
and opinions from the assembled
experts on the Peer Consultation panel
and those attending the public meeting,
and for assisting EPA in developing
decisions?
• Have the communications related to
the Peer Consultation process, activities
and outcomes been effective and have
they facilitated public understanding
and use of the information generated
from this process?
• Should the time allowed for
sponsor commitment remain the same,
i.e., 6 months to commit to Tier 1, and
4 months to commit to subsequent
Tiers? (The commitment period is the
time for the sponsor to decide whether
to participate in VCCEP, form a
consortium, and notify the Agency.)
• How can the timeliness of activities
under the VCCEP pilot be improved?
Should specific due dates be established
for each step in the process? If so, how
should a missed due date be addressed?
• Should the sponsor be requested to
commit to more than one tier at a time?
Is it better to run the VCCEP pilot with
commitments at each tier, i.e., three
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
commitments, or to run the VCCEP pilot
with two commitments, i.e., to Tier 1
and to Tiers 2/3?
• Are there any ways in which EPA’s
contributions to the VCCEP pilot’s
evaluation and data needs decision
process could be improved or made
more effective?
• Has the VCCEP pilot made
significant progress with respect to its
objectives?
• The VCCEP pilot was designed to
ensure that health effects, exposure, and
risk information are made available to
the public to enable a better
understanding of the potential health
risks to children associated with certain
chemical exposures. Does the VCCEP
website provide easy access to and
adequate explanation of the information
generated by the VCCEP pilot?
Commenters should follow the
guidance provided in Unit I.B. and
under ADDRESSES when preparing and
submitting their comments.
IV. Comments Document
EPA will prepare a Comments
Document summarizing the comments
received in response to this notice and
at a public meeting, if held. The
Comments Document will identify any
common themes and will assist EPA in
determining what modifications might
be made to make the program run more
efficiently and/or better meet the
objectives of VCCEP. Significant
program modifications which the
Agency is considering as a result of this
evaluation will be discussed with
stakeholders before implementing.
At this time, once the Comments
Document is complete, EPA expects to
make the Comments Document
available to the public on the VCCEP
website. The Comments Document will
not be published in the Federal
Register, nor will a notice of availability
be published in the Federal Register
announcing its appearance on the
VCCEP website. However, if you
provide your e-mail address, EPA will
notify you by e-mail when the
Comments Document is available on the
VCCEP website at https://www.epa.gov/
chemrtk/vccep.
V. Public Meeting
If there are requests to do so, EPA will
hold a public meeting to discuss and
take comment on the implementation of
the VCCEP pilot. To request a public
meeting, follow the directions under
ADDRESSES.
VI. Materials in the Docket
An official docket was established for
this VCCEP pilot evaluation under
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2006–0341. The docket includes
information considered by EPA in
developing this notice such as the
documents specifically referenced in
this action, any public comments
received, and other information related
to this action. In addition, interested
parties should consult documents that
are referenced in the documents that
EPA has placed in the public docket,
regardless of whether these referenced
documents are physically located in the
public docket. For assistance in locating
documents that are referenced in
documents that EPA has placed in the
public docket, but that are not
physically located in the docket, please
consult the technical contact listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The public docket is available
for review as specified under
ADDRESSES.
1. EPA. Voluntary Children’s
Chemical Evaluation Program. Federal
Register (65 FR 81700, December 26,
2000) (FRL–6758–5). Available on-line
at: https://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep/
pubs/ts00274d.pdf.
2. EPA. Methodology for Selecting
Chemicals for the Voluntary Children’s
Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP)
Pilot. December 5, 2000. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/
vccep/vccepmth.htm.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Child health.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. E6–19574 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8243–7]
2007 Blue Ribbon Water Quality
Trading Awards—Call for Nominations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
initiation of an EPA recognition and
leadership program for excellence in
water quality trading, ‘‘Blue Ribbon
Water Quality Trading Awards,’’ and
solicits nominations for possible award
to water quality trading programs and
policies which have achieved or are
expected to achieve environmental and
economic benefits. Blue Ribbon Water
Quality Trading Awards will encourage
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67121-67124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19574]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0341; FRL-8057-1]
Implementation of the Pilot Voluntary Children's Chemical
Evaluation Program; Request for Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is requesting comment on the implementation of the pilot
phase of the Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP).
VCCEP was designed to collect health effects, exposure, and risk
information on chemicals to which children are likely to be exposed,
and to make that information available to the public so the public may
better understand the potential health risks to children associated
with certain chemical exposures. EPA announced the program in December
2000 and the pilot began in 2001 when companies volunteered to sponsor
their chemicals under VCCEP. At what is approximately the midpoint in
the implementation of the pilot phase of VCCEP, EPA is preparing to
evaluate how well it is meeting its objectives for VCCEP. To this end,
EPA is seeking comments from participants and observers about the
operations and experience under the VCCEP pilot to this point. If
requested, EPA will hold a public meeting to take comment on the
implementation of the pilot phase of VCCEP.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 19, 2007.
Requests for a public meeting must be received on or before
December 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To submit comments: Submit your comments, identified by
docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0341, by one of the
following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East, Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Attention:
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0341. The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2006-0341. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information
is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the
OPPT Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC). The EPA/DC suffered structural
damage due to flooding in June 2006. Although the EPA/DC is continuing
operations, there will be temporary changes to the EPA/DC during the
clean-up. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room, which was temporarily closed
due to flooding, has been relocated in the EPA Headquarters Library,
Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334) in EPA West, located at 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is
(202) 566-0280. EPA visitors are required to show photographic
identification and sign the EPA visitor log. Visitors to the EPA/DC
Public Reading Room will be provided with an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times while in the EPA Building and returned to the
guard upon departure. In addition, security personnel will escort
visitors to and from the new EPA/DC Public Reading Room location. Up-
to-date information about the EPA/DC is on the EPA website at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
To request a public meeting: Submit your request, identified by
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0341, to Catherine Roman by one of
the following methods:
E-mail address: roman.catherine@epa.gov.
Mail: Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001, ATTN: Catherine
Roman.
Hand Delivery: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, EPA East, ATTN: Catherine Roman. Ask the reception desk to call
(202) 564-4780. Such deliveries should be made during normal working
hours, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone
[[Page 67122]]
number: (202) 554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact: Catherine Roman, Chemical
Control Division (7405M), Office Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-4780; e-mail
address: roman.catherine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of particular interest to those chemical manufacturers
(including importers) who produce or import chemical substances that
are subject to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), individuals or
groups concerned with chemical testing and children's health, and
animal welfare groups. Because other entities may also be interested,
the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that
may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at the estimate.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggested alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA is requesting comment from stakeholders, interested parties,
and the general public on the implementation of the VCCEP pilot and is
also evaluating the progress of the VCCEP pilot toward meeting its
objectives. VCCEP was designed to collect health effects, exposure, and
risk information on chemicals to which children are likely to be
exposed, and to make that information available to the public so the
public may better understand the potential health risks to children
associated with certain chemical exposures, and to allow EPA and others
to evaluate the risks of these chemicals so that mitigation measures
may be taken as appropriate.
EPA announced VCCEP in a December 26, 2000 Federal Register notice
(Ref. 1) and requested chemical manufacturers and importers to
participate in a VCCEP pilot by voluntarily committing to sponsor an
information collection on 23 chemicals. The VCCEP pilot is intended to
allow EPA to gain insight as to how best to design and implement VCCEP
in order to effectively provide the Agency and the public with the
means to understand the potential health risks to children associated
with exposure to chemicals to which children may be exposed. EPA
intends the VCCEP pilot to be the means of identifying efficiencies
which can be applied to the subsequent implementation of VCCEP.
Several factors were considered in selecting the 23 chemicals for
the VCCEP pilot; they included substantial production/importation (one
million lbs. or more per year), presence in the environment, and
biomonitoring evidence of presence in humans. A detailed description of
the selection process used by EPA is in the document entitled
Methodology for Selecting Chemicals for the Voluntary Children's
Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP) Pilot (Ref. 2).
The requested commitment for the VCCEP pilot was for Tier 1
information, with the potential for EPA to request participants to make
additional commitments to Tier 2 and Tier 3 information based on an
evaluation of the Tier 1 submission. As part of their Tier 1
commitments, sponsors were asked to include an expected submission date
that, as described in the December 2000 notice, is based on the amount
of time EPA considered necessary to gather the information (or perform
testing, if necessary) and prepare the assessments. Other guidance on
timeliness provided in the December 2000 notice included the following:
Within 6 months from the publication of the December 2000
notice was the recommended deadline to commit to Tier 1.
Within 4 months after announcing EPA's Data Needs Decision
was the recommended deadline to commit to upper tiers.
Within 1 month after receiving a chemical assessment was
EPA's goal to make it publicly available on the VCCEP website.
During 2001, 35 companies and 10 consortia voluntarily committed to
sponsor 20 of the 23 chemicals in the VCCEP pilot. Three of the twenty-
three chemicals were not sponsored and remain unsponsored. Also in
2001, EPA arranged for a third party, Toxicology for Excellence in Risk
Assessment (TERA), to organize and facilitate public Peer Consultation
meetings to evaluate the chemical assessments to be submitted by the
chemical sponsors. At a Peer Consultation meeting, a panel of
scientific experts with extensive and broad experience in toxicity
testing, exposure evaluation, or the specific chemical discuss the
chemical assessment and offer their opinions on its adequacy and
possible additional data needs. This discussion is held at a public
meeting where interested parties may also present comments. TERA
prepares a report summarizing the opinions expressed at the public
meeting and submits this report to EPA. EPA considers this report when
it reviews the chemical assessment prior to forming its decision
regarding additional data needs of the chemical.
In terms of progress, by the end of August 2006, the VCCEP pilot
sponsors had submitted Tier 1 chemical assessments for 12 of the 20
chemicals; all 12 chemical assessments had been evaluated in public
Peer Consultation meetings; summary reports of the Peer Consultation
meetings for the 12
[[Page 67123]]
chemical assessments were made available; and EPA had reviewed the Peer
Consultation reports and issued Data Needs Decisions for 6 of the 12
chemicals. EPA is in the process of developing Data Needs Decisions for
the remaining 6 chemicals.
In its six Data Needs Decisions, EPA decided that additional data
were needed for three chemicals. A consortium of three companies
organized by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) has agreed to proceed
to Tier 2 of the VCCEP pilot and sponsor the additional information
collection for one of the chemicals. The Tier 1 sponsor of the other
two chemicals with additional data needs informed the Agency that it
will not commit to participate in Tier 2 for those chemicals. For the
other three chemicals for which Data Needs Decisions have been issued,
EPA concluded that the Tier 1 assessments provide sufficient
information to adequately characterize the risk to children of exposure
to those chemicals, and EPA considers the evaluation of these three
chemicals to be completed for purposes of the VCCEP pilot. To summarize
the activity and progress of the VCCEP pilot through August 2006, the
table in this unit indicates how many chemicals have completed
successive stages in the VCCEP pilot:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of chemicals which
Stages in the VCCEP Process have completed each stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor commitment to provide Tier 1 20
information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 chemical assessment submitted 12 *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 chemical assessment has gone 12
through Peer Consultation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peer Consultation report available 12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA issued a Data Needs Decision 6
(3 chemicals had Tier 2 data needs, 3
chemicals did not have Tier 2 data
needs.).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received a sponsor commitment to provide 1
Tier 2 information
OR ............................
Agency informed it will not receive 2
sponsor commitment to provide Tier 2
information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* As noted on the VCCEP website, the submission of chemical assessments
for four chemicals (ethylbenzene, ethylene dichloride,
perchloroethylene, and trichloroethylene) has been delayed due to
other commitments to develop the data as part of another effort or
program.
The most recent information on the progress of specific chemicals
in the VCCEP pilot is presented on the VCCEP website (https://
www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep). Since the Fall of 2001, EPA has kept the
public informed of activities in the VCCEP pilot through the VCCEP
website. The website describes VCCEP and how it was developed. It also
lists the chemicals and their sponsors, the date of sponsor commitments
to each tier, the submission dates of chemical assessments, the dates
of upcoming public Peer Consultation meetings, and the completion dates
of Peer Consultation reports and EPA's Data Needs Decisions. Most
importantly, the website makes the cited information available to the
public by providing links to the chemical assessments, the Peer
Consultation reports, and EPA's Data Needs Decisions.
In terms of timeliness for EPA, TERA, and the sponsors meeting the
scheduled goals for the VCCEP pilot, the following observations are
made:
All sponsors committed to Tier 1 by the 6-month deadline.
As part of their Tier 1 commitments, the sponsors for 5 of
the 12 chemicals for which EPA has received a chemical assessment as of
August 2006, provided a projected submission date for their Tier 1
chemical assessment. The chemical assessment for only one of the five
chemicals (decabromodiphenyl ether) was received by EPA by the
projected submission date.
Some of the projected submission dates originally provided
by the sponsors were subsequently revised at the request of the
sponsor, or due to TERA scheduling of Peer Consultation meetings.
EPA made all the chemical assessments available on the
VCCEP website within 1 month of receipt.
Although a recommended deadline for scheduling the Peer
Consultation meetings was not specified in the December 2000 notice,
the meetings for the 12 chemicals for which EPA has received a chemical
assessment as of August 2006 were held within an average of 2.4 months
of receiving the chemical assessment.
Although a recommended deadline for TERA to issue its
report summarizing a Peer Consultation meeting was not specified in the
December 2000 notice, TERA issued its reports for the 12 chemicals for
which EPA has received a chemical assessment as of August 2006, within
an average of 4.1 months after each meeting.
The notice announcing VCCEP (Ref. 1, p. 81714) stated that EPA
expected to evaluate the VCCEP pilot at 3 and 6 years after its
initiation. EPA chose not to conduct an evaluation at 3 years because a
sufficient number of chemicals had not gone through the public Peer
Consultation process and, as a consequence of this, there was
insufficient information to prepare a useful evaluation. Consequently,
EPA decided to conduct a single evaluation at a point 5 years,
approximately midway, into the program (i.e., 2006).
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
Congress gave EPA the authority to implement TSCA for the purpose
of protecting human health and the environment, in part, by requiring
testing and, if necessary, by restricting the manufacture, processing,
distribution in commerce, use, or disposal of certain chemical
substances. VCCEP is a voluntary program which focuses on collecting
information and developing data necessary to protect children from
risks associated with chemical substances to which they are likely to
be exposed. This notice seeks public involvement in a midpoint
evaluation of how the VCCEP pilot is meeting its objectives and the
overall objectives of VCCEP.
III. Request for Comment
EPA is requesting comment from stakeholders, interested parties,
and the general public on the implementation of the VCCEP pilot, what
modifications might be made to make the VCCEP pilot run more
efficiently, and how well the VCCEP pilot is meeting the objectives of
VCCEP. The main objectives of VCCEP are:
To collect exposure, hazard, and risk information on
chemicals to which children are likely to be exposed.
To make the information available to the public so the
public may better understand the potential health risks to children
associated with certain chemical exposures.
The Agency is particularly interested in receiving your feedback
with regard
[[Page 67124]]
to the list of questions in this Unit III. Commenters should not feel
that they must confine their comments to the following specific
questions, nor should they feel they must respond to any or all of the
questions. Commenters, however, should attempt to provide comments on
the aspects of the VCCEP pilot with which they have had experience and/
or have formed a definite opinion. To be most helpful in the Agency's
evaluation, please provide enough detail to explain or illustrate
conclusions that you have reached based on your experiences.
Have the hazard, exposure, and risk assessments submitted
by the sponsors provided sufficient information to enable the Peer
Consultation panel to adequately evaluate these aspects as they relate
to children from the chemicals in question? Have the Data Needs
Assessments prepared by the sponsors been fair and unbiased?
Has the Peer Consultation process been open, transparent,
timely, and useful as a forum for scientists and experts from various
stakeholder groups to exchange views on sponsors' assessments and
recommended data needs? How might it be improved?
Has the Peer Consultation process been efficient? If not,
what improvements could be made?
Has the Peer Consultation panel adequately considered both
toxicology and exposure information in developing its results?
Does the Peer Consultation process provide a
scientifically rigorous and effective means for eliciting comments and
opinions from the assembled experts on the Peer Consultation panel and
those attending the public meeting, and for assisting EPA in developing
decisions?
Have the communications related to the Peer Consultation
process, activities and outcomes been effective and have they
facilitated public understanding and use of the information generated
from this process?
Should the time allowed for sponsor commitment remain the
same, i.e., 6 months to commit to Tier 1, and 4 months to commit to
subsequent Tiers? (The commitment period is the time for the sponsor to
decide whether to participate in VCCEP, form a consortium, and notify
the Agency.)
How can the timeliness of activities under the VCCEP pilot
be improved? Should specific due dates be established for each step in
the process? If so, how should a missed due date be addressed?
Should the sponsor be requested to commit to more than one
tier at a time? Is it better to run the VCCEP pilot with commitments at
each tier, i.e., three commitments, or to run the VCCEP pilot with two
commitments, i.e., to Tier 1 and to Tiers 2/3?
Are there any ways in which EPA's contributions to the
VCCEP pilot's evaluation and data needs decision process could be
improved or made more effective?
Has the VCCEP pilot made significant progress with respect
to its objectives?
The VCCEP pilot was designed to ensure that health
effects, exposure, and risk information are made available to the
public to enable a better understanding of the potential health risks
to children associated with certain chemical exposures. Does the VCCEP
website provide easy access to and adequate explanation of the
information generated by the VCCEP pilot?
Commenters should follow the guidance provided in Unit I.B. and
under ADDRESSES when preparing and submitting their comments.
IV. Comments Document
EPA will prepare a Comments Document summarizing the comments
received in response to this notice and at a public meeting, if held.
The Comments Document will identify any common themes and will assist
EPA in determining what modifications might be made to make the program
run more efficiently and/or better meet the objectives of VCCEP.
Significant program modifications which the Agency is considering as a
result of this evaluation will be discussed with stakeholders before
implementing.
At this time, once the Comments Document is complete, EPA expects
to make the Comments Document available to the public on the VCCEP
website. The Comments Document will not be published in the Federal
Register, nor will a notice of availability be published in the Federal
Register announcing its appearance on the VCCEP website. However, if
you provide your e-mail address, EPA will notify you by e-mail when the
Comments Document is available on the VCCEP website at https://
www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep.
V. Public Meeting
If there are requests to do so, EPA will hold a public meeting to
discuss and take comment on the implementation of the VCCEP pilot. To
request a public meeting, follow the directions under ADDRESSES.
VI. Materials in the Docket
An official docket was established for this VCCEP pilot evaluation
under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0341. The docket includes
information considered by EPA in developing this notice such as the
documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments
received, and other information related to this action. In addition,
interested parties should consult documents that are referenced in the
documents that EPA has placed in the public docket, regardless of
whether these referenced documents are physically located in the public
docket. For assistance in locating documents that are referenced in
documents that EPA has placed in the public docket, but that are not
physically located in the docket, please consult the technical contact
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The public docket is
available for review as specified under ADDRESSES.
1. EPA. Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program. Federal
Register (65 FR 81700, December 26, 2000) (FRL-6758-5). Available on-
line at: https://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep/pubs/ts00274d.pdf.
2. EPA. Methodology for Selecting Chemicals for the Voluntary
Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP) Pilot. December 5, 2000.
Available on-line at: https://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep/vccepmth.htm.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Child health.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
[FR Doc. E6-19574 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S