Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Increased Assessment Rate, 66702-66704 [06-9253]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
66702
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules
to determine the amount of production to
count.); or
(B) If you elect to continue to care for the
crop, the amount of production to count for
the acreage will be the harvested production,
or our reappraisal if additional damage
occurs and the crop is not harvested; and
(2) All harvested production from the
insurable acreage.
(3) Any other uninsurable mustard
production that is delivered to fulfill the
processor contract.
(d) Mature mustard may be adjusted for
excess moisture and quality deficiencies. If
moisture adjustment is applicable, it will be
made prior to any adjustment for quality.
(1) Mustard production will be reduced by
0.12 percent for each 0.1 percentage point of
moisture in excess of 10.0 percent. We may
obtain samples of the production to
determine the moisture content.
(2) Mustard production will be eligible for
quality adjustment only if:
(i) Deficiencies in quality result in the
mustard not meeting the requirements for
acceptance under the processor contract
because of damaged seeds (excluding heat
damage), or a musty, sour, or commercially
objectionable foreign odor; or
(ii) Substances or conditions are present
that are identified by the Food and Drug
Administration or other public health
organizations of the United States as being
injurious to human or animal health.
(3) Quality will be a factor in determining
your loss in mustard production only if:
(i) The deficiencies, substances, or
conditions specified in section 13(d)(2)
resulted from a cause of loss specified in
section 10 that occurs within the insurance
period;
(ii) The deficiencies, substances, or
conditions specified in section 13(d)(2) result
in a salvage price less than the base contract
price;
(iii) All determinations of these
deficiencies, substances, or conditions
specified in section 13(d)(2) are made using
samples of the production obtained by us or
by a disinterested third party approved by us;
and
(iv) The samples are analyzed by a grader
in accordance with the Directive for
Inspection of Mustard Seed, provided by the
Federal Grain Inspection Service or such
other directive or standards that may be
issued by FCIC.
(4) Mustard production that is eligible for
quality adjustment, as specified in sections
13(d)(2) and (3), will be reduced by
multiplying the quality adjustment factors
contained in the Special Provisions (or the
quality adjustment factors determined by
dividing the salvage price by the base
contract price (not to exceed 1.000) if the
quality adjustment factors are not contained
in the Special Provisions) by the number of
pounds remaining after any reduction due to
excessive moisture (the moisture-adjusted
gross pounds) of the damaged or conditioned
production.
(i) The salvage price will be determined at
the earlier of the date such quality adjusted
production is sold or the date of final
inspection for the unit subject to the
following conditions:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:07 Nov 15, 2006
Jkt 211001
(A) Discounts used to establish the salvage
price will be limited to those that are usual,
customary, and reasonable.
(B) The salvage price will not include any
reductions for:
(1) Moisture content;
(2) Damage due to uninsured causes;
(3) Drying, handling, processing, or any
other costs associated with normal
harvesting, handling, and marketing of the
mustard; except, if the salvage price can be
increased by conditioning, we may reduce
the salvage price, after the production has
been conditioned, by the cost of conditioning
but not lower than the salvage price before
conditioning; and
(ii) We may obtain salvage prices from any
buyer of our choice. If we obtain salvage
prices from one or more buyers located
outside your local market area, we will
reduce such price by the additional costs
required to deliver the mustard to those
buyers.
(iii) Factors not associated with grading
under the Directive for Inspection of Mustard
Seed, provided by the Federal Grain
Inspection Service or such other directive or
standards that may be issued by FCIC
including, but not limited to, protein and oil
will not be considered.
(e) Any production harvested from plants
growing in the insured crop may be counted
as production of the insured crop on an
unadjusted weight basis.
14. Late Planting
In lieu of section 16(a) of the Basic
Provisions, the production guarantee
(per acre) for each acre planted to the
insured crop during the late planting
period will be reduced by 1 percent per
day for each day planted after the final
planting date, unless otherwise
specified in the Special Provisions.
15. Prevented Planting
In addition to the provisions
contained in section 17 of the Basic
Provisions, your prevented planting
coverage will be 60 percent of your
production guarantee (per acre) for
timely planted acreage. If you have
limited or additional levels of coverage,
as specified in 7 CFR part 400, subpart
T, and pay an additional premium, you
may increase your prevented planting
coverage to the levels specified in the
actuarial documents.
Signed in Washington, DC, on November 7,
2006.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–19320 Filed 11–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. FV06–966–2 PR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Florida Tomato Committee (Committee)
for the 2006–07 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.025 to $0.035 per 25pound container or equivalent of
tomatoes handled. The Committee
locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of
tomatoes grown in Florida. Assessments
upon Florida tomato handlers are used
by the Committee to fund reasonable
and necessary expenses of the program.
The fiscal period begins August 1 and
ends July 31. The assessment rate would
remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist or Christian D. Nissen,
Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone:
(863) 324–3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or
E-mail: William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM
16NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 125 and Order No. 966, both as
amended (7 CFR part 966), regulating
the handling of tomatoes grown in
Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, Florida tomato handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
tomatoes beginning on August 1, 2006,
and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2006–07 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.025 to
$0.035 per 25-pound container or
equivalent of tomatoes.
The Florida tomato marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:07 Nov 15, 2006
Jkt 211001
handlers of Florida tomatoes. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2003–04 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from fiscal
period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on August 22,
2006, and unanimously recommended
2006–07 expenditures of $2,193,700 and
an assessment rate of $0.035 per 25pound container or equivalent of
tomatoes. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $2,161,800.
The assessment rate of $0.035 is $0.01
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The increase in the assessment rate is
needed to continue to support the
increased budget for advertising and
promotion started last season, while
reducing the amount of funds drawn
from the Committee’s authorized
reserve. Without the increase in the
assessment rate, the Committee would
need to utilize an additional $500,000
from the authorized reserve.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2006–07 fiscal period include
$1,000,000 for education and
promotions, $445,900 for salaries,
$320,000 for research, $67,000 for
employee retirement, and $63,800 for
employee health insurance. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2005–06
were $1,000,000, $428,000, $320,000,
$65,000 and $63,800, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of Florida tomatoes. Tomato
shipments for the year are estimated at
50 million which should provide
$1,750,000 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler
assessments, along with interest income
and funds from the Committee’s
authorized reserve, would be adequate
to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in
the reserve (currently around $700,000)
would be kept within the maximum
permitted by the order of not to exceed
one fiscal period’s expenses as stated in
§ 966.44.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66703
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee would continue to meet
prior to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2006–07 budget and those
for subsequent fiscal periods would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 100
producers of tomatoes in the production
area and approximately 70 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13
CFR 121.201).
Based on industry and Committee
data, the average annual price for fresh
Florida tomatoes during the 2005–06
season was approximately $10.27 per
25-pound container or equivalent, and
total fresh shipments for the 2005–06
season were 47,880,303 25-pound
equivalent cartons of tomatoes.
Committee data indicates that
E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM
16NOP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
66704
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules
approximately 25 percent of the
handlers handle 94 percent of the total
volume shipped outside the regulated
area. Based on the average annual price
of $10.27 per 25-pound container, about
75 percent of handlers could be
considered small businesses under
SBA’s definition. In addition, based on
production, grower prices as reported by
the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, and the total number of Florida
tomato growers, the average annual
grower revenue is below $750,000.
Thus, the majority of handlers and
producers of Florida tomatoes may be
classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers
for the 2006–07 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.025 to $0.035 per 25pound container or equivalent of
tomatoes. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2006–07 expenditures of
$2,193,700 and an assessment rate of
$0.035 per pound container. The
proposed assessment rate of $0.035 is
$0.01 higher than the 2005–06 rate. The
quantity of assessable tomatoes for the
2006–07 season is estimated at 50
million cartons. Thus, the $0.035 rate
should provide $1,750,000 in
assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with
interest income and funds from the
Committee’s authorized reserve, would
be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2006–07 fiscal period include
$1,000,000 for education and
promotions, $445,900 for salaries,
$320,000 for research, $67,000 for
employee retirement, and $63,800 for
employee health insurance. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2005–06
were $1,000,000, $428,000, $320,000,
$65,000, and $63,800, respectively.
As previously mentioned, the number
of assessable containers during 2006–07
is estimated to be 50 million and the
recommended assessment rate would
generate $1,750,000 in income. The
Committee’s financial reserve is now
estimated to be $700,000 and is
available to cover the deficit in
assessment income. The increase in the
assessment rate is needed to continue to
support the increased budget for
advertising and promotion started last
season, while reducing the amount of
funds drawn from the Committee’s
authorized reserve. Without the increase
in the assessment rate, the Committee
would need to utilize an additional
$500,000 from the authorized reserve.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2006–07
expenditures of $2,193,700 which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:07 Nov 15, 2006
Jkt 211001
included increases in administrative
and office salaries. Prior to arriving at
this budget, the Committee considered
information from various sources, such
as the Committee’s Executive
Subcommittee, Finance Subcommittee,
Research Subcommittee, and Education
and Promotion Subcommittee.
Alternative expenditure levels were
discussed by these groups, based upon
the relative value of various research
projects to the tomato industry. The
assessment rate of $0.035 per 25-pound
container of tomatoes was determined
by examining the anticipated expenses
and expected shipments and
considering available reserves. The
recommended assessment rate would
generate $1,750,000 in income.
Considering income from interest and
other sources of $190,000, with
assessments, total income would be
approximately $253,700 below the
anticipated expenses, which the
Committee determined to be acceptable.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming season indicates that the
grower price for the 2006–07 season
could range between $8.27 and $12.95
per 25-pound container or equivalent of
tomatoes. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2006–07
season as a percentage of total grower
revenue could range between 0.3 and
0.4 percent.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the marketing order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Florida
tomato industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 22,
2006, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Florida tomato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2006–07 fiscal period began on August,
1, 2006, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for
each fiscal period apply to all assessable
tomatoes handled during such fiscal
period; (2) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to pay its expenses
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
fiscal periods.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 966.234 is revised to read
as follows:
On and after August, 1, 2006, an
assessment rate of $0.035 per 25-pound
container or equivalent is established
for Florida tomatoes.
Dated: November 14, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–9253 Filed 11–14–06; 1:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM
16NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 221 (Thursday, November 16, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66702-66704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. FV06-966-2 PR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Florida Tomato Committee (Committee) for the 2006-07 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.025 to $0.035 per 25-pound container or
equivalent of tomatoes handled. The Committee locally administers the
marketing order which regulates the handling of tomatoes grown in
Florida. Assessments upon Florida tomato handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal period begins August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate
would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of
the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863) 325-8793, or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202)
720-
[[Page 66703]]
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 125 and Order No. 966, both as amended (7 CFR part 966),
regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, Florida tomato
handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate
as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable tomatoes
beginning on August 1, 2006, and continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2006-07 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.025 to
$0.035 per 25-pound container or equivalent of tomatoes.
The Florida tomato marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
Florida tomatoes. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2003-04 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on August 22, 2006, and unanimously recommended
2006-07 expenditures of $2,193,700 and an assessment rate of $0.035 per
25-pound container or equivalent of tomatoes. In comparison, last
year's budgeted expenditures were $2,161,800. The assessment rate of
$0.035 is $0.01 higher than the rate currently in effect. The increase
in the assessment rate is needed to continue to support the increased
budget for advertising and promotion started last season, while
reducing the amount of funds drawn from the Committee's authorized
reserve. Without the increase in the assessment rate, the Committee
would need to utilize an additional $500,000 from the authorized
reserve.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2006-07
fiscal period include $1,000,000 for education and promotions, $445,900
for salaries, $320,000 for research, $67,000 for employee retirement,
and $63,800 for employee health insurance. Budgeted expenses for these
items in 2005-06 were $1,000,000, $428,000, $320,000, $65,000 and
$63,800, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Florida
tomatoes. Tomato shipments for the year are estimated at 50 million
which should provide $1,750,000 in assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the
Committee's authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. Funds in the reserve (currently around $700,000) would be
kept within the maximum permitted by the order of not to exceed one
fiscal period's expenses as stated in Sec. 966.44.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2006-07 budget and those
for subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 100 producers of tomatoes in the production
area and approximately 70 handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on industry and Committee data, the average annual price for
fresh Florida tomatoes during the 2005-06 season was approximately
$10.27 per 25-pound container or equivalent, and total fresh shipments
for the 2005-06 season were 47,880,303 25-pound equivalent cartons of
tomatoes. Committee data indicates that
[[Page 66704]]
approximately 25 percent of the handlers handle 94 percent of the total
volume shipped outside the regulated area. Based on the average annual
price of $10.27 per 25-pound container, about 75 percent of handlers
could be considered small businesses under SBA's definition. In
addition, based on production, grower prices as reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service, and the total number of
Florida tomato growers, the average annual grower revenue is below
$750,000. Thus, the majority of handlers and producers of Florida
tomatoes may be classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2006-07 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.025 to $0.035 per 25-pound container or
equivalent of tomatoes. The Committee unanimously recommended 2006-07
expenditures of $2,193,700 and an assessment rate of $0.035 per pound
container. The proposed assessment rate of $0.035 is $0.01 higher than
the 2005-06 rate. The quantity of assessable tomatoes for the 2006-07
season is estimated at 50 million cartons. Thus, the $0.035 rate should
provide $1,750,000 in assessment income. Income derived from handler
assessments, along with interest income and funds from the Committee's
authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2006-07
fiscal period include $1,000,000 for education and promotions, $445,900
for salaries, $320,000 for research, $67,000 for employee retirement,
and $63,800 for employee health insurance. Budgeted expenses for these
items in 2005-06 were $1,000,000, $428,000, $320,000, $65,000, and
$63,800, respectively.
As previously mentioned, the number of assessable containers during
2006-07 is estimated to be 50 million and the recommended assessment
rate would generate $1,750,000 in income. The Committee's financial
reserve is now estimated to be $700,000 and is available to cover the
deficit in assessment income. The increase in the assessment rate is
needed to continue to support the increased budget for advertising and
promotion started last season, while reducing the amount of funds drawn
from the Committee's authorized reserve. Without the increase in the
assessment rate, the Committee would need to utilize an additional
$500,000 from the authorized reserve.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2006-07
expenditures of $2,193,700 which included increases in administrative
and office salaries. Prior to arriving at this budget, the Committee
considered information from various sources, such as the Committee's
Executive Subcommittee, Finance Subcommittee, Research Subcommittee,
and Education and Promotion Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure
levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative value of
various research projects to the tomato industry. The assessment rate
of $0.035 per 25-pound container of tomatoes was determined by
examining the anticipated expenses and expected shipments and
considering available reserves. The recommended assessment rate would
generate $1,750,000 in income. Considering income from interest and
other sources of $190,000, with assessments, total income would be
approximately $253,700 below the anticipated expenses, which the
Committee determined to be acceptable.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming season indicates that the grower price for
the 2006-07 season could range between $8.27 and $12.95 per 25-pound
container or equivalent of tomatoes. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2006-07 season as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 0.3 and 0.4 percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Florida tomato industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the August
22, 2006, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Florida tomato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate
because: (1) The 2006-07 fiscal period began on August, 1, 2006, and
the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each
fiscal period apply to all assessable tomatoes handled during such
fiscal period; (2) the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay
its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers
are aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate
actions issued in past fiscal periods.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Tomatoes.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 966--TOMATOES GROWN IN FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 966 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 966.234 is revised to read as follows:
On and after August, 1, 2006, an assessment rate of $0.035 per 25-
pound container or equivalent is established for Florida tomatoes.
Dated: November 14, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-9253 Filed 11-14-06; 1:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P