Revocation of Class D Airspace; Elko, NV, 66444-66445 [06-9177]

Download as PDF 66444 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations § 121.404 When does SBA determine the size status of a business concern? rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1 * * * * * (g) * * * However, the following exceptions apply: (1) Within 30 days of an approved contract novation, a contractor must recertify its small business size status to the procuring agency, or inform the procuring agency that it is other than small. If the contractor is other than small, the agency can no longer count the options or orders issued pursuant to the contract, from that point forward, towards its small business goals. (2) In the case of a merger or acquisition, where contract novation is not required, the contractor must, within 30 days of the transaction becoming final, recertify its small business size status to the procuring agency, or inform the procuring agency that it is other than small. If the contractor is other than small, the agency can no longer count the options or orders issued pursuant to the contract, from that point forward, towards its small business goals. The agency and the contractor must immediately revise all applicable Federal contract databases to reflect the new size status. (3) For the purposes of contracts with durations of more than five years (including options), including Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Contracts, Multiple Agency Contracts (MACs) and Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), a contracting officer must request that a business concern recertify its small business size status no more than 120 days prior to the end of the fifth year of the contract, and no more than 120 days prior to exercising any option thereafter. If the contractor certifies that it is other than small, the agency can no longer count the options or orders issued pursuant to the contract towards its small business prime contracting goals. The agency and the contractor must immediately revise all applicable Federal contract databases to reflect the new size status. (i) A business concern that certified itself as other than small, either initially or prior to an option being exercised, may recertify itself as small for a subsequent option period if it meets the applicable size standard. (ii) Re-certification does not change the terms and conditions of the contract. The limitations on subcontracting, nonmanufacturer and subcontracting plan requirements in effect at the time of contract award remain in effect throughout the life of the contract. (iii) A request for a size recertification shall include the size standard in effect at the time of re- VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:33 Nov 14, 2006 Jkt 211001 certification that corresponds to the NAICS code that that was initially assigned to the contract. (iv) A contracting officer must assign a NAICS code and size standard to each order under a long-term contract. The NAICS code and size standard assigned to an order must correspond to a NAICS code and size standard assigned to the underlying long-term contract. A concern will be considered small for that order only if it certified itself as small under the same or lower size standard. (v) Where the contracting officer explicitly requires concerns to recertify their size status in response to a solicitation for an order, SBA will determine size as of the date the concern submits its self-representation as part of its response to the solicitation for the order. (vi) A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is not a contract. Goods and services are acquired under a BPA when an order is issued. Thus, a concern’s size may not be determined based on its size at the time of a response to a solicitation for a BPA. * * * * * I 3. Amend § 121.1004 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: § 121.1004 protests? What time limits apply to size (a) * * * (3) Long-Term Contracts. For contracts with durations greater than five years (including options), including all existing long-term contracts, Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Contracts, Multiple Agency Contracts (MACs), and Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs): (i) Protests regarding size certifications made for contracts must be received by the contracting officer prior to the close of business on the 5th day, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after receipt of notice (including notice received in writing, orally, or via electronic posting) of the identity of the prospective awardee or award. (ii) Protests regarding size certifications made for an option period must be received by the contracting officer prior to the close of business on the 5th day, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after receipt of notice (including notice received in writing, orally, or via electronic posting) of the size certification made by the protested concern. (A) A contracting officer is not required to terminate a contract where a concern is found to be other than small pursuant to a size protest PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 concerning a size certification made for an option period. (B) [Reserved] (iii) Protests relating to size certifications made in response to a contracting officer’s request for size certifications in connection with an individual order must be received by the contracting officer prior to the close of business on the 5th day, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after receipt of notice (including notice received in writing, orally, or via electronic posting) of the identity of the prospective awardee or award. * * * * * PART 124—8(A) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS STATUS DETERMINATIONS Subpart A—8(a) Business Development 4. The authority citation for part 124 continues to read: I Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), 636(j), 637(a), 637(d) and Pub. L. 99–661, Pub. L. 100–656, sec. 1207, Pub. L. 101–37, Pub. L. 101–574, and 42 U.S.C. 9815. 5. Amend § 124.503 to revise paragraph (h) to read as follows: I § 124.503 How does SBA accept a procurement for award through the 8(a) BD program? * * * * * (h) Task and Delivery Order Contracts. If a task or delivery order contract was previously offered to and accepted into the 8(a) BD program, task and delivery orders under the contract are not to be offered to or accepted into the 8(a) BD program. See § 121.404(g)(3) for rules concerning size recertifications in connection with longterm contracts. * * * * * Dated: November 7, 2006. Steven C. Preston, Administrator. [FR Doc. E6–19253 Filed 11–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2006–25243; Airspace Docket No. 06–AWP–11] Revocation of Class D Airspace; Elko, NV Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM 15NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This action corrects the Document Management System docket number contained in the Direct Final Rule that was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 (71 FR 40651). Airspace Docket No. 06– AWP–11. DATES: Effective Date: December 15, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Tonish, Airspace Specialist, Airspace Branch, AWP–520.1, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261, telephone (310) 725–6539. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Docket No. FAA–2006–24243; Airspace Docket No. 06–AWP–11, published on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 (71 FR 40651) revoked Class D airspace at Elko, NV. An error was discovered in the docket number. Docket No. FAA–2006–24243 should have been FAA–2006–25243. This action corrects that error. Correction to Direct Final Rule Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, and in consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration corrects the Docket No. in the Federal Register, published Tuesday, July 18, 2006 (Vol. 71, No. 137, page 40651, column 3), as follows: * * * * * I 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2006–25243; Airspace Docket No. 06–AWP–11] * * * * * Issued in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2006. Leonard Mobley, Acting Area Director, Western Terminal Operations. [FR Doc. 06–9177 Filed 11–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 97 rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1 [Docket No. 30522; Amdt. No. 3193] Standard Instrument Approach Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:33 Nov 14, 2006 Jkt 211001 SUMMARY: This amendment amends Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) for operations at certain airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of changes occurring in the National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities, addition of new obstacles, or changes in air traffic requirements. These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under instrument flight rules at the affected airports. This rule is effective November 15, 2006. The compliance date for each SIAP is specified in the amendatory provisions. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of November 15, 2006. ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the amendment is as follows: For Examination— 1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which affected airport is located; or 3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or, 4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/ federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. For Purchase—Individual SIAP copies may be obtained from: 1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or 2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected airport is located. By Subscription—Copies of all SIAPs, mailed once every 2 weeks, are for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald P. Pate, Flight Procedure Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight Technologies and Programs Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 66445 OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) telephone: (405) 954–4164. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) amends Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs). The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is contained in the appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the the National Flight Data Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P–NOTAM), which is incorporated by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and Section 97.20 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Materials incorporated by reference are available for examination or purchase as stated above. The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is unnecessary. The provisions of this amendment state the affected CFR sections, with the types and effective dates of the SIAPs. This amendment also identifies the airport, its location, the procedure identification and the amendment number. The Rule This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs. The SIAPs, as modified by FDC PNOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these chart changes to SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to only these specific conditions existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30 days. E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM 15NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 15, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66444-66445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2006-25243; Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-11]


Revocation of Class D Airspace; Elko, NV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[[Page 66445]]


ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the Document Management System docket 
number contained in the Direct Final Rule that was published in the 
Federal Register on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 (71 FR 40651). Airspace 
Docket No. 06-AWP-11.

DATES: Effective Date: December 15, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Tonish, Airspace Specialist, 
Airspace Branch, AWP-520.1, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific 
Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, 
Lawndale, California 90261, telephone (310) 725-6539.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Docket No. FAA-2006-24243; Airspace Docket 
No. 06-AWP-11, published on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 (71 FR 40651) 
revoked Class D airspace at Elko, NV. An error was discovered in the 
docket number. Docket No. FAA-2006-24243 should have been FAA-2006-
25243. This action corrects that error.

Correction to Direct Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, and in 
consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration 
corrects the Docket No. in the Federal Register, published Tuesday, 
July 18, 2006 (Vol. 71, No. 137, page 40651, column 3), as follows:
* * * * *

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2006-25243; Airspace Docket No. 06-AWP-11]

* * * * *

    Issued in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2006.
Leonard Mobley,
Acting Area Director, Western Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 06-9177 Filed 11-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.