Draft Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards; Availability, 66336-66340 [E6-19195]
Download as PDF
66336
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 14, 2006 / Notices
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of draft guidance for
industry (#136) entitled ‘‘Protocols for
the Conduct of Method Transfer Studies
for Type C Medicated Feed Assay
Methods.’’ This draft guidance provides
our recommendations for protocols for
conducting the transfer study of a
single-laboratory validated Type C
medicated feed assay method to
laboratories that have no experience
with the test method.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on this draft guidance by
January 29, 2007, to ensure their
adequate consideration in preparation of
the final document. General comments
on agency guidance documents are
welcome at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Communications Staff (HFV–12), Center
for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. Comments should be
identified with the full title of the draft
guidance and the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/
ecomments. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca L. Owen, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–141), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9842, email: rebecca.owen@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Background
Section 512(b) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b)
establishes the requirements for a new
animal drug approval. FDA regulations
specify the information you (the
sponsor) must submit as part of your
new animal drug application (NADA)
and the proper format for the NADA
submission (§ 514.1 (21 CFR 514.1)). As
part of your NADA submission, you
must describe analytical procedures
capable of determining the active
component(s) of the new animal drug
within a reasonable degree of accuracy
and of assuring the identity of such
components (21 CFR 514.1(b)(5)(vii)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Nov 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
This includes a description of
practicable methods of analysis (assay
methods) that have adequate sensitivity
to determine the amount of the new
animal drug in the final dosage form (21
CFR 514.1(b)(5)(vii)(a)). In the case of a
Type A medicated article, the Type C
medicated feed is a final dosage form
used to treat the animal. Thus as part of
the NADA review process, FDA looks at
assay methods for determining the
amount of a new animal drug in Type
C medicated feed.
This draft guidance provides our (the
Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation
or ONADE) recommendations for
protocols for conducting the transfer
study of a single-laboratory validated
Type C medicated feed assay method to
laboratories that have no experience
with the test method. Many testing
laboratories, including state feed
laboratories and contract laboratories,
use Type C medicated feed assay
methods to determine whether the drug
in a medicated feed is within the assay
limits. The term ‘‘assay limits’’ refers to
the amount of the drug detected when
a Type B/C feed is assayed. The limit is
a range that is codified at 21 CFR
558.4(d). When feed assay values fall
within this range, it indicates that the
feed has been prepared with the correct
amount of Type A medicated article.
Because many different laboratories use
medicated feed assays, it is important
that the assay methods are reproducible.
Sponsors should conduct method
transfer studies to evaluate
reproducibility. A method transfer study
is part of the evaluation process for a
Type C medicated feed assay method
and demonstrates the transferability of
the feed assay method among different
laboratories by comparing the results
each laboratory obtains when using the
method to analyze a specific set of feed
samples. Sponsors may expand the
method transfer study to include other
medicated feed products, such as Top
Dress Type C, Free-Choice Type C, and
Type B medicated feeds.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in § 514.1 have been
approved under OMB control nos.
0910–0032 and 0910–0154.
III. Significance of Guidance
This draft level 1 guidance is being
issued consistent with FDA’s good
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR
10.115). This draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency’s
current thinking on the topic. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any
person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternate method
may be used as long as it satisfies the
requirements of applicable statutes and
regulations.
IV. Comments
This draft guidance is being
distributed for comment purposes only
and is not intended for implementation
at this time. Interested persons may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments regarding this draft
guidance document. Submit a single
copy of electronic comments or two
paper copies of any mailed comments,
except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
V. Electronic Access
Electronic comments may be
submitted on the Internet at https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Copies of the draft guidance document
entitled ‘‘Protocols for the Conduct of
Method Transfer Studies for Type C
Medicated Feed Assay Methods’’ may
be obtained from the CVM Home Page
(https://www.fda.gov/cvm) and from the
Division of Dockets Management Web
site (https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm).
Dated: November 7, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–19204 Filed 11–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006D–0419]
Draft Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft document entitled
‘‘Voluntary National Retail Food
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 14, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Regulatory Program Standards’’ (the
Program Standards). The Program
Standards are intended to help state,
local, and tribal regulators design and
manage a retail food regulatory program
that is focused on the reduction of
foodborne illness risk factors.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments concerning the draft Program
Standards document and its
recommendations for collection of
information by January 16, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft Program
Standards document to Glenda R.
Lewis, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–626), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301–
436–2150. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your request. Submit written
comments concerning the draft Program
Standards document and its
recommendations for collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments on the draft
Program Standards document and its
recommendations for collection of
information to https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments. All comments
should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the draft
manuals and received comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Glenda R. Lewis, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–626), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740–
3835, 301–436–2150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
While the responsibility for regulating
retail and foodservice establishments
lies primarily with state, local, and
tribal jurisdictions, FDA provides
assistance to these jurisdictions through
multiple means including, but not
limited to, training and technical
assistance. Authority for providing such
assistance is derived from section 311 of
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
243). In addition, FDA’s mission under
section 903(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21
U.S.C. 393(b)(2)(A)) includes ensuring
that foods are safe, wholesome, and
sanitary, and section 903(b)(4) of the act
directs FDA to cooperate with food
retailers, among others, in carrying out
this part of its mission.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Nov 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention has identified the major
contributing factors associated with
foodborne illness outbreaks. Five of
these contributing factors directly relate
to retail and foodservice establishments
and are called ‘‘foodborne illness risk
factors’’ by FDA. In an effort to assist
state, local, and tribal regulators and the
retail and food service entities they
regulate, FDA developed draft Program
Standards.
The Program Standards were
developed to address the need for
national uniformity among retail food
regulatory programs, to promote
uniform application of the FDA Food
Code, and to reduce the occurrence of
foodborne illness risk factors. The
Program Standards were developed with
extensive input from state, tribal, and
local regulatory authorities. They
capture the best management practices
currently in use by those authorities and
are intended to help those authorities
design and manage a retail food
regulatory program that is focused on
the reduction of foodborne illness risk
factors.
The incorporation of a risk-based
methodology into regulatory inspection
programs is an important element in
reaching the goals established by the
President’s Council on Food Safety in
the document entitled ‘‘Food Safety
Strategic Plan’’ released in January 2001
(available at https://www.foodsafety.gov/
~fsg/cstrpl–4.html) as well as FDA’s
food safety program goals.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), Federal agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA’s
functions, including whether the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66337
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards
In the Federal Register of May 9, 2001
(66 FR 23715), a 60-day notice was
published soliciting comments on
FDA’s collection of information from
local, state and tribal authorities
concerning their use of or planned use
of FDA’s Program Standards. No
comments were received in response to
that notice. The agency has decided to
reissue this 60-day notice for further
comment because the Program
Standards have been revised since the
previous notice. The January 2005
revision of the Program Standards is
available in draft for comment on FDA’s
Web site at https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/
~dms/ret3toc.html.
The Program Standards define nine
essential elements of an effective
regulatory program for retail food
establishments, establish basic quality
control criteria for each element, and
provide a means of recognition for those
state, local, and tribal regulatory
programs that meet the Program
Standards. The program elements
addressed by the Program Standards are
as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation,
(2) trained regulatory staff, (3)
inspection program based on HACCP
principles, (4) uniform inspection
program, (5) foodborne illness and food
security preparedness and response, (6)
compliance and enforcement, (7)
industry and community relations, (8)
program support and resources, and (9)
program assessment. Each standard
includes a list of records needed to
document compliance with the standard
(referred to in the Program Standards
document as ‘‘quality records’’) and has
one or more corresponding appendices
that contain forms and worksheets to
facilitate the collection of information
needed to assess a retail program under
that standard. The respondents are
State, local and tribal government
agencies. Regulatory agencies may use
existing, available records or may
choose to develop and use alternate
forms and worksheets that capture the
same information.
In the course of their normal
activities, state, local, and tribal
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
66338
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 14, 2006 / Notices
regulatory agencies already collect and
keep on file many of the records needed
as quality records to document
compliance with the end of each
Program Standard by jurisdictions that
enroll. Although the detail and format
in which this information is collected
and recorded may vary by jurisdiction,
records that are kept as a usual and
customary part of normal agency
activities include inspection records,
written quality assurance procedures
and records of quality assurance checks,
staff training certificates and other
training records, a log or database of
food-related illness or injury
complaints, records of investigations
resulting from such complaints, an
inventory of inspection equipment,
records of outside audits, and records of
outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas
and minutes, documentation of food
safety education activities). No new
recordkeeping burden is associated with
these existing records, which are
already a part of usual and customary
program recordkeeping activities by
state, local, and tribal regulatory
agencies, and which can serve as quality
records under the Program Standards.
State, local, and tribal regulatory
agencies that enroll in the Program
Standards and seek listing in the FDA
National Registry are required to report
to FDA on the completion of the
following three management tasks
outlined in the Program Standards: (1)
Conducting a program self assessment;
(2) conducting a baseline survey of the
regulated industry; and (3) obtaining an
independent outside audit (verification
audit). All three tasks must be
completed within a 3-year time span.
The results are reported to FDA on Form
FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA National Registry
Report,’’ and Form FDA 3520,
‘‘Permission to Publish in National
Registry.’’ These forms are located in
Appendix I of the Program Standards. If
a regulatory agency follows all the
recordkeeping recommendations in the
individual standards and their
appendices, it will have all the
information needed to complete the
forms. The time required to complete
the forms is minimal.
Recordkeeping
FDA’s recordkeeping burden estimate
includes time required for a state, local,
or tribal agency to review the
instructions in the Program Standards,
compile information from existing
sources, and create any records
recommended in the Program Standards
that are not already kept in the normal
course of the agency’s usual and
customary activities. Worksheets
(Appendices) are provided to assist in
this compilation. In estimating the time
needed for the program self-assessment
(Program Standards 1–8, shown in chart
1 of this document), FDA considered
responses from four state and three local
jurisdictions that participated in an FDA
Program Standards Pilot study. Chart 2
of this document shows the estimated
recordkeeping burden for the
completion of the baseline data
collection and chart 3 of this document
shows the estimated recordkeeping
burden for the verification audit. The
overall program improvement cycle is a
3-year period for completion of all three
management tasks.
CHART 1.—YEAR ONE—SELF ASSESSMENT
Standard
Hours per Recordkeeper
(Year One)
Recordkeeping Activity
No. 1 Regulatory Foundation
Self Assessment: (Appendix A1) Completion of worksheet recording results of evaluations and comparison on worksheets
16
No. 2 Trained Regulatory
Staff
Self Assessment: (Appendix B1) Completion of summary worksheet of each employee training records2
19
No. 3 HACCP Principles
Self Assessment: (Appendix C1) Completion of worksheet documentation
No. 4 Uniform Inspection
Program
Self Assessment: (Appendix D1) Completion of worksheet documentation of jurisdiction’s quality assurance procedures2
No. 5 Foodborne Illness
and Food Security Preparedness and Response
Self Assessment: (Appendix E1) Completion of worksheet documentation
No. 6 Compliance Enforcement
Self Assessment: (Appendix F1) Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files
@ 25 minutes per file. Estimate is based on a mean number of 45. Completion of
worksheet
No. 7 Industry and Community Relations
Self Assessment: (Appendix G1) Completion of worksheet
2
No. 8 Program Support and
Resources
Self Assessment: (Appendix H1) Selection and review of establishment files
8
4
5
Subtotal
1Or
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
19
92
comparable documentation.
will vary depending on the number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
2Estimates
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19
19:07 Nov 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
66339
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 14, 2006 / Notices
CHART 2.—YEAR TWO—BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
Hours Per Recordkeeper
(Year Two)
Standard
Recordkeeping Activity
No. 9 Program Assessment
Baseline Data Collection (Appendices I and J). Selection and inspection of randomly
selected statistical sample of 9 to 87 establishments from each of 9 facility types1
333
1Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type. Estimates will vary depending
on the number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
CHART 3.—YEAR THREE—VERIFICATION AUDIT
Standard
Hours per Recordkeeper
(Year Three)
Recordkeeping Activity
Verification Audit (Appendices I and J)1
9
46
1We
estimate that no more than 50 percent of time spent to complete self assessment of all nine Standards is spent completing verification
audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than nine standards require verification audits.
FDA estimated the annual hours per
recordkeeper (i.e., per enrolled
jurisdiction) in table 1 of this document
by adding the recordkeeping estimates
for the management tasks of self
assessment, baseline data collection,
and verification audit (charts 1, 2, and
3 of this document) that enrolled
jurisdictions must perform during a 3year cycle, then dividing the total by
three to obtain an annual average.
The estimates in tables 1 and 2 of this
document are based on the estimated
participation of 500 regulatory
jurisdictions in the Program Standards.
There are approximately 3,000
jurisdictions in the United States and its
territories that have retail food
regulatory programs. Enrollment in the
Program Standards is voluntary, and
therefore FDA does not expect all
jurisdictions to participate in the near
future. In its 2002 operational plan, the
FDA National Retail Food Team
established a goal of enrolling 15
percent of eligible agencies, or 450
programs, in the Program Standards by
the year 2010. For purposes of this
burden estimate, it is reasonable to take
into account the possibility that this
goal could be exceeded by
approximately 10 percent, for a total of
approximately 500 participating
agencies.
Thus, FDA estimates the burden for
this collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
FDA Worksheets2
No. of
Recordkeepers
Appendices A through J
Annual Frequency
per Recordkeeping
500
Total Annual
Records
1
Hours per
Recordkeeper
500
Total Hours
157
Total Burden Hours
78,500
78,500
1There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
2Or comparable documentation.
Reporting
Based on the number and nature of
the items that need to be completed,
FDA estimates a total of 12 minutes
annually for each enrolled jurisdiction
to complete both FDA Form 3519, ‘‘FDA
National Registry Report,’’ and Form
3520, ‘‘Permission to Publish in
National Registry.’’ Form 3519 requires
the name and address of the
jurisdiction; completion dates for the
self assessment, baseline survey
(original and update), and verification
audit; names of the person(s) who
completed the self-assessment,
verification audit, baseline survey,
baseline survey update, and action plan;
signature of the program manager; and
date the form was completed. Form
3520 requires the name of the
jurisdiction, completion date of the self
assessment, date of the verification
audit report, name of the auditor,
signature and title of the official
completing the form, and date the form
was completed. As explained previously
in this document, FDA estimates that
500 regulatory jurisdictions will enroll
in the Program Standards. The reporting
burden in table 2 of this document
includes only the time necessary to fill
out and send the forms, as compiling
the underlying information (including
self-assessment reports, baseline
surveys, outside audits, and supporting
documentation) is accounted for under
the recordkeeping estimates in table 1 of
this document.
Thus, FDA estimates the burden for
this collection of information as follows:
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
FDA Forms
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
3519
500
1
500
6 min
50 hours
3520
500
1
500
6 min
50 hours
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Nov 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
66340
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 14, 2006 / Notices
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1—Continued
No. of
Respondents
FDA Forms
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Burden Hours
1There
100 hours
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
III. Comments
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft Program Standards
document at https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/
~dms/ret3toc.html.
Dated: October 31, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–19195 Filed 11–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
[DHS–2006–0070]
Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory
Committee
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory
Committee Meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
date, time, location, and agenda for the
next meeting of the Department of
Homeland Security Data Privacy and
Integrity Advisory Committee. This
meeting will be open to the public, with
the exception of a one-hour
administrative session.
DATES: The meeting will be held from 8
a.m. to 11:15 a.m. and 12:15 p.m. to 2:30
p.m. on Wednesday, December 6, 2006,
in Miami Beach, Florida.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Nov 13, 2006
The Department of
Homeland Security Data Privacy and
Integrity Advisory Committee meeting
will be held in the Key Biscayne A room
of the Eden Roc Hotel, 4525 Collins
Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33140.
Persons wishing to make comments or
who are unable to attend or speak at the
meeting may submit comments at any
time. All submissions received must
include the docket number: DHS–2006–
0070 and may be submitted by any one
of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow
instructions for submitting comments
on the Web site.
• E-mail: PrivacyCommittee@dhs.gov.
Include docket number in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (571) 227–4171.
• Mail: Ms. Rebecca J. Richards,
Executive Director, Data Privacy and
Integrity Advisory Committee,
Department of Homeland Security, Mail
Stop D–3, Arlington, Virginia 22202.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the docket number: DHS–
2006–0070. Comments received will
also be posted without alteration at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received by the DHS Data
Privacy and Integrity Committee, go to
www.regulations.gov. Comments
received will be posted without
alteration at https://www.dhs.gov/
privacy, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy Officer, or
Rebecca J. Richards, Executive Director,
Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory
Committee, Department of Homeland
Security, Arlington, Virginia 22202, by
telephone (571) 227–3813, by fax (571)
227–4171, or by e-mail
PrivacyCommittee@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Data
Privacy and Integrity Advisory
Committee (‘‘Privacy Advisory
Committee’’) will be meeting on
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, in the
Key Biscayne A room of the Eden Roc
Hotel, 4525 Collins Avenue, Miami
Beach, Florida 33140. The meeting will
be held from 8 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. and
12:15 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES:
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on the draft Program
Standards document and its
recommendations for collection of
information. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. The draft Program Standards
document and received comments may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Total Hours
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
During the meeting, the DHS Chief
Privacy Officer will provide an update
on the activities of the DHS Privacy
Office. The Subcommittees will update
the Committee on the work currently
being conducted. In the morning and
afternoon sessions, invited speakers will
discuss data integrity and credentialing
programs. A tentative agenda has been
posted on the Privacy Advisory
Committee Web site at https://
www.dhs.gov/privacy.
Public comments will be accepted
during the meeting between 2 p.m. and
2:30 p.m. All those who wish to make
public comments during this time may
register in advance or sign-up on the
day of the meeting. In order to allow as
many people as possible to testify,
witnesses should limit their remarks to
three minutes. For those wishing to
make written comments, please follow
the procedure noted above.
Public attendance is encouraged. Any
member of the public who wishes to
attend the public session is requested to
provide his or her name and affiliation
no later than 2 p.m. EST, Friday,
December 1, 2006, to Rebecca J.
Richards via e-mail at
PrivacyCommittee@dhs.gov, or via
telephone at (571) 227–3813. This will
assist with the preparation of name
badges, meeting materials and seating
arrangements. Everyone who plans to
attend is respectfully requested to be
present and seated by 7:45 a.m. for the
morning session and by 12 p.m. for the
afternoon session.
Persons with disabilities who require
special assistance should indicate this
in their admittance request and are
encouraged to identify anticipated
special needs as early as possible.
Although every effort will be made to
accommodate all members of the public,
seating is limited and will be allocated
on a first-come, first-served basis.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–19173 Filed 11–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66336-66340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006D-0419]
Draft Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft document entitled ``Voluntary National Retail
Food
[[Page 66337]]
Regulatory Program Standards'' (the Program Standards). The Program
Standards are intended to help state, local, and tribal regulators
design and manage a retail food regulatory program that is focused on
the reduction of foodborne illness risk factors.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments concerning the draft
Program Standards document and its recommendations for collection of
information by January 16, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
Program Standards document to Glenda R. Lewis, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-626), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2150. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
request. Submit written comments concerning the draft Program Standards
document and its recommendations for collection of information to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic
comments on the draft Program Standards document and its
recommendations for collection of information to https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
manuals and received comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glenda R. Lewis, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-626), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-2150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
While the responsibility for regulating retail and foodservice
establishments lies primarily with state, local, and tribal
jurisdictions, FDA provides assistance to these jurisdictions through
multiple means including, but not limited to, training and technical
assistance. Authority for providing such assistance is derived from
section 311 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243). In
addition, FDA's mission under section 903(b)(2)(A) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 393(b)(2)(A)) includes
ensuring that foods are safe, wholesome, and sanitary, and section
903(b)(4) of the act directs FDA to cooperate with food retailers,
among others, in carrying out this part of its mission.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has identified the
major contributing factors associated with foodborne illness outbreaks.
Five of these contributing factors directly relate to retail and
foodservice establishments and are called ``foodborne illness risk
factors'' by FDA. In an effort to assist state, local, and tribal
regulators and the retail and food service entities they regulate, FDA
developed draft Program Standards.
The Program Standards were developed to address the need for
national uniformity among retail food regulatory programs, to promote
uniform application of the FDA Food Code, and to reduce the occurrence
of foodborne illness risk factors. The Program Standards were developed
with extensive input from state, tribal, and local regulatory
authorities. They capture the best management practices currently in
use by those authorities and are intended to help those authorities
design and manage a retail food regulatory program that is focused on
the reduction of foodborne illness risk factors.
The incorporation of a risk-based methodology into regulatory
inspection programs is an important element in reaching the goals
established by the President's Council on Food Safety in the document
entitled ``Food Safety Strategic Plan'' released in January 2001
(available at https://www.foodsafety.gov/~fsg/cstrpl-4.html) as well as
FDA's food safety program goals.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed
collection of information before submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of
the proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's functions, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy
of FDA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards
In the Federal Register of May 9, 2001 (66 FR 23715), a 60-day
notice was published soliciting comments on FDA's collection of
information from local, state and tribal authorities concerning their
use of or planned use of FDA's Program Standards. No comments were
received in response to that notice. The agency has decided to reissue
this 60-day notice for further comment because the Program Standards
have been revised since the previous notice. The January 2005 revision
of the Program Standards is available in draft for comment on FDA's Web
site at https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/ret3toc.html.
The Program Standards define nine essential elements of an
effective regulatory program for retail food establishments, establish
basic quality control criteria for each element, and provide a means of
recognition for those state, local, and tribal regulatory programs that
meet the Program Standards. The program elements addressed by the
Program Standards are as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation, (2)
trained regulatory staff, (3) inspection program based on HACCP
principles, (4) uniform inspection program, (5) foodborne illness and
food security preparedness and response, (6) compliance and
enforcement, (7) industry and community relations, (8) program support
and resources, and (9) program assessment. Each standard includes a
list of records needed to document compliance with the standard
(referred to in the Program Standards document as ``quality records'')
and has one or more corresponding appendices that contain forms and
worksheets to facilitate the collection of information needed to assess
a retail program under that standard. The respondents are State, local
and tribal government agencies. Regulatory agencies may use existing,
available records or may choose to develop and use alternate forms and
worksheets that capture the same information.
In the course of their normal activities, state, local, and tribal
[[Page 66338]]
regulatory agencies already collect and keep on file many of the
records needed as quality records to document compliance with the end
of each Program Standard by jurisdictions that enroll. Although the
detail and format in which this information is collected and recorded
may vary by jurisdiction, records that are kept as a usual and
customary part of normal agency activities include inspection records,
written quality assurance procedures and records of quality assurance
checks, staff training certificates and other training records, a log
or database of food-related illness or injury complaints, records of
investigations resulting from such complaints, an inventory of
inspection equipment, records of outside audits, and records of
outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas and minutes, documentation of
food safety education activities). No new recordkeeping burden is
associated with these existing records, which are already a part of
usual and customary program recordkeeping activities by state, local,
and tribal regulatory agencies, and which can serve as quality records
under the Program Standards.
State, local, and tribal regulatory agencies that enroll in the
Program Standards and seek listing in the FDA National Registry are
required to report to FDA on the completion of the following three
management tasks outlined in the Program Standards: (1) Conducting a
program self assessment; (2) conducting a baseline survey of the
regulated industry; and (3) obtaining an independent outside audit
(verification audit). All three tasks must be completed within a 3-year
time span. The results are reported to FDA on Form FDA 3519, ``FDA
National Registry Report,'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish
in National Registry.'' These forms are located in Appendix I of the
Program Standards. If a regulatory agency follows all the recordkeeping
recommendations in the individual standards and their appendices, it
will have all the information needed to complete the forms. The time
required to complete the forms is minimal.
Recordkeeping
FDA's recordkeeping burden estimate includes time required for a
state, local, or tribal agency to review the instructions in the
Program Standards, compile information from existing sources, and
create any records recommended in the Program Standards that are not
already kept in the normal course of the agency's usual and customary
activities. Worksheets (Appendices) are provided to assist in this
compilation. In estimating the time needed for the program self-
assessment (Program Standards 1-8, shown in chart 1 of this document),
FDA considered responses from four state and three local jurisdictions
that participated in an FDA Program Standards Pilot study. Chart 2 of
this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the
completion of the baseline data collection and chart 3 of this document
shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the verification audit.
The overall program improvement cycle is a 3-year period for completion
of all three management tasks.
CHART 1.--YEAR ONE--SELF ASSESSMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per Recordkeeper
Standard Recordkeeping Activity (Year One)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1 Self Assessment: (Appendix A\1\) 16
Regulatory Completion of worksheet
Foundation recording results of
evaluations and comparison on
worksheets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 2 Trained Self Assessment: (Appendix B\1\) 19
Regulatory Completion of summary worksheet
Staff of each employee training
records\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 3 HACCP Self Assessment: (Appendix C\1\) 4
Principles Completion of worksheet
documentation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 4 Uniform Self Assessment: (Appendix D\1\) 19
Inspection Completion of worksheet
Program documentation of jurisdiction's
quality assurance procedures\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 5 Self Assessment: (Appendix E\1\) 5
Foodborne Completion of worksheet
Illness and documentation
Food
Security
Preparedness
and Response
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 6 Self Assessment: (Appendix F\1\) 19
Compliance Selection and review of 20 to
Enforcement 70 establishment files @ 25
minutes per file. Estimate is
based on a mean number of 45.
Completion of worksheet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 7 Self Assessment: (Appendix G\1\) 2
Industry and Completion of worksheet
Community
Relations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 8 Program Self Assessment: (Appendix H\1\) 8
Support and Selection and review of
Resources establishment files
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal ................................ 92
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Or comparable documentation.
\2\Estimates will vary depending on the number of regulated food
establishments and the number of inspectors employed by the
jurisdiction.
[[Page 66339]]
CHART 2.--YEAR TWO--BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours Per Recordkeeper
Standard Recordkeeping Activity (Year Two)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9 Program Baseline Data Collection 333
Assessment (Appendices I and J). Selection
and inspection of randomly
selected statistical sample of
9 to 87 establishments from
each of 9 facility types\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA
inspection time for each establishment type. Estimates will vary
depending on the number of regulated food establishments within a
jurisdiction and the number of inspectors employed by the
jurisdiction.
CHART 3.--YEAR THREE--VERIFICATION AUDIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per Recordkeeper
Standard Recordkeeping Activity (Year Three)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Verification Audit (Appendices I 46
and J)\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\We estimate that no more than 50 percent of time spent to complete
self assessment of all nine Standards is spent completing verification
audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than nine
standards require verification audits.
FDA estimated the annual hours per recordkeeper (i.e., per enrolled
jurisdiction) in table 1 of this document by adding the recordkeeping
estimates for the management tasks of self assessment, baseline data
collection, and verification audit (charts 1, 2, and 3 of this
document) that enrolled jurisdictions must perform during a 3-year
cycle, then dividing the total by three to obtain an annual average.
The estimates in tables 1 and 2 of this document are based on the
estimated participation of 500 regulatory jurisdictions in the Program
Standards. There are approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the United
States and its territories that have retail food regulatory programs.
Enrollment in the Program Standards is voluntary, and therefore FDA
does not expect all jurisdictions to participate in the near future. In
its 2002 operational plan, the FDA National Retail Food Team
established a goal of enrolling 15 percent of eligible agencies, or 450
programs, in the Program Standards by the year 2010. For purposes of
this burden estimate, it is reasonable to take into account the
possibility that this goal could be exceeded by approximately 10
percent, for a total of approximately 500 participating agencies.
Thus, FDA estimates the burden for this collection of information
as follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
Worksheets\2\ Recordkeepers per Recordkeeping Records Recordkeeper Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendices A 500 1 500 157 78,500
through J
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden ................. .................... ................. .................... 78,500
Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\Or comparable documentation.
Reporting
Based on the number and nature of the items that need to be
completed, FDA estimates a total of 12 minutes annually for each
enrolled jurisdiction to complete both FDA Form 3519, ``FDA National
Registry Report,'' and Form 3520, ``Permission to Publish in National
Registry.'' Form 3519 requires the name and address of the
jurisdiction; completion dates for the self assessment, baseline survey
(original and update), and verification audit; names of the person(s)
who completed the self-assessment, verification audit, baseline survey,
baseline survey update, and action plan; signature of the program
manager; and date the form was completed. Form 3520 requires the name
of the jurisdiction, completion date of the self assessment, date of
the verification audit report, name of the auditor, signature and title
of the official completing the form, and date the form was completed.
As explained previously in this document, FDA estimates that 500
regulatory jurisdictions will enroll in the Program Standards. The
reporting burden in table 2 of this document includes only the time
necessary to fill out and send the forms, as compiling the underlying
information (including self-assessment reports, baseline surveys,
outside audits, and supporting documentation) is accounted for under
the recordkeeping estimates in table 1 of this document.
Thus, FDA estimates the burden for this collection of information
as follows:
Table 2.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
FDA Forms Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3519 500 1 500 6 min 50 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3520 500 1 500 6 min 50 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66340]]
Total Burden ................. .................... ................. ................. 100 hours
Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments on the draft Program
Standards document and its recommendations for collection of
information. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this document. The draft Program
Standards document and received comments may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft Program
Standards document at https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/ret3toc.html.
Dated: October 31, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6-19195 Filed 11-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S