U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy and Implementation Plan, 66162-66163 [E6-19060]
Download as PDF
66162
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices
a result of these factors, purchasers in the
lake states area are now faced with high bid
prices on their existing contracts, low
product prices, and no market related
contract term addition to provide additional
time for markets to recover or to mix the
higher priced timber with lower priced
timber for other sources. The market related
contract term addition procedures do not
appear to be functioning as expected here.
In another example the sale of biomass
material has been increasing in recent years
with most of that material utilized for
generating electricity in co-generation
facilities. A reliable index for tracking this
new product has not been found so most
sales of biomass material also use the wood
chips index. But, energy prices can differ
substantially in different parts of the country
and don’t necessarily follow the wood chips
index. Consequently, in areas where energy
prices have drastically declined and
purchasers are holding high price timber sale
contracts, they are not currently eligible to
receive a market related contract term
addition because the wood chips index has
not triggered.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Determination of Substantial Overriding
Public Interest
The Government benefits if defaulted
timber sale contracts, mill closures, and
bankruptcies can be avoided by granting
extensions. Having numerous, economically
viable, timber sale purchasers increases
competition for National Forest System
timber sales, results in higher prices paid for
such timber, and allows the Forest Service to
provide a continuous supply of timber to the
public in accordance with the Organic
Administration Act. In addition, by
extending contracts and avoiding defaults,
closures and bankruptcies, the Government
avoids the difficult, lengthy, expensive, and
sometimes impossible, process of collecting
default damages.
Therefore, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 472a, and
the authority delegated to me at 7 CFR 2.59,
I have determined that it is in the substantial
overriding public interest to extend for up to
one year certain National Forest System
timber sales that were awarded prior to
January 1, 2006. This finding does not apply
to contracts that have been or are currently
eligible to be extended under market related
contract term addition contract provisions, to
salvage sale contracts that were sold with the
objective of harvesting deteriorating timber,
or to contracts that are in breach. Total
contract length shall not exceed 10 years as
a result of this extension. For those contracts
extended pursuant to this finding, periodic
payments due after the date of this
determination will also be deferred for up to
one year. To receive the extension and
periodic payment deferral, purchasers must
make written request and agree to release the
Forest Service from all claims and liability if
a contract extended pursuant to this finding
is suspended, modified or terminated in the
future.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Nov 09, 2006
Jkt 211001
Dated: November 2, 2006.
David P. Tenny
Deputy Under Secretary of Agriculture for
Natural Resources and Environment.
[FR Doc. E6–19102 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service Open Space
Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan
Forest Service, USDA.
Request for public input.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is inviting
all interested members of the public to
provide input into the development of
the USDA Forest Service Open Space
Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan, which will help
shape the agency’s strategic role in a
national effort to conserve open space.
The Forest Service is interested in
addressing the effects of the loss of open
space on private forests; on the National
Forests and Grasslands and surrounding
landscape; and on forests in cities,
suburbs, and towns. Input for the
Strategy and Implementation Plan
should focus on programs, research,
partnerships, and/or policy
recommendations that could be
developed to conserve open space. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more background on the loss of open
space and the Strategy and
Implementation Plan.
DATES: The Forest Service will review
public input received no later than
December 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Claire Harper, USDA Forest Service,
Cooperative Forestry, Mail Stop Code
1123, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–1123; via
electronic mail to openspace@fs.fed.us;
or via facsimile to (202) 205–1271. The
agency cannot confirm receipt of
comments. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection. The
public may inspect comments during
regular business hours at the office of
the Cooperative Forestry Staff, 4th Floor
SE., Yates Building, 201 14th Street,
SW., Washington, DC. Visitors are
encouraged to call ahead to (202) 205–
1389 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information about the Open
Space Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan and the loss of
open space, contact Claire Harper,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
USDA Forest Service, Cooperative
Forestry, by telephone at (202) 205–
1389 or by electronic mail at
openspace@fs.fed.us. For a summary of
the Forest Service’s current research,
programs, and resources available to
facilitate open space conservation,
please review the Forest Service’s
publication entitled ‘‘Cooperating
Across Boundaries: Partnerships to
Conserve Open Space in Rural
America.’’ Electronic copies of this
publication are available at https://
www.fs.fed.us/projects/four-threats/
documents/
cooperatingacrossboundaries.pdf, and
hardcopies are available by contacting
Claire Harper at openspace@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 2003, Forest Service Chief Dale
Bosworth identified the loss of open
space as one of four great threats facing
our nation’s forests and grasslands. Loss
of open space is an issue that affects the
sustainability of both the National
Forests and Grasslands and private
forests. Open space—including public
and private land, wilderness and
working land—provides a multitude of
public benefits and ecosystem services
we all need and enjoy. Three
interrelated trends of conversion,
fragmentation, and parcelization are
jeopardizing the long term health and
function of forests, limiting management
options, and reducing opportunities for
public enjoyment and use. To address
the loss of open space threat, the Forest
Service is building a national strategy to
identify how the agency plans to focus
its efforts on the issue. This strategy will
provide actions and policy
recommendations to conserve open
space, with an emphasis on
partnerships and collaborative
approaches.
II. Open Space Conservation Strategy
and Implementation Plan
The Forest Service recognizes that it
is not the only contributor to open space
conservation; it is only one among
many. The Forest Service also
acknowledges that the agency’s role in
open space conservation is not to
regulate development or land use, but is
to provide expertise, resources,
information, and programs. To help
prioritize and focus the agency’s efforts,
the Forest Service plans to develop and
refine an Open Space Conservation
Strategy and Implementation Plan to
address the loss of open space.
Input for the Strategy and
Implementation Plan should focus on
programs, research, partnerships and/or
policy recommendations that could be
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices
developed to conserve open space.
Specifically, input regarding the
following three questions is most useful:
1. How can the Forest Service protect
land from conversion to other uses;
2. How can the Forest Service assist
private landowners and communities in
maintaining and managing their land as
sustainable forests and grasslands; and
3. How can the Forest Service mitigate
the impacts of existing and new
developments.
By receiving input from people with
diverse interests and perspectives, the
agency hopes to attain an array of
viewpoints and ideas regarding the
Open Space Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan. Feedback from a
range of interested individuals will
assist the agency in developing a wellinformed, focused, and effective strategy
to address the loss of open space threat.
Dated: November 2, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E6–19060 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–428–815]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review
and Revocation of Order In Part:
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from Germany
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 13, 2006, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
preliminary results of changed
circumstances reviews with the intent to
revoke, in part, the antidumping duty
order on certain corrosion–resistant
carbon steel flat products (‘‘corrosion–
resistant steel’’) from Germany, as
described below. See Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews And Notice of
Intent to Revoke Order in Part: Certain
Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Germany, 71 FR 60473
(October 13, 2006) (Preliminary Results).
In our Preliminary Results, the
Department invited interested parties to
comment on the preliminary
determination to exclude certain
corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat
products from Germany (‘‘product in
question’’), as described below, from the
scope of the order. The Department
received no comments.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Nov 09, 2006
Jkt 211001
Absent any comments, the
Department concludes that producers
accounting for substantially all of the
production of the domestic like product
to which this order pertains lack interest
in the relief provided by this order with
respect to the product in question
because the domestic parties: (1) Made
affirmative statements of no interest in
the continuation of the order with
respect to the product in question; and
(2) did not comment on the Preliminary
Results, in which the Department stated
its intent to revoke the order with
respect to that merchandise. Therefore,
the Department concludes that it is
appropriate to revoke this order, in part,
with respect to unliquidated entries of
the product in question that are not
subject to the final results of an
administrative review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy
Lao or Richard Weible, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482- 7924 or (202) 482–
1103, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the
antidumping duty order on corrosion–
resistant steel from Germany on August
19, 1993. See Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order: Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from Germany, 58
FR 44170 (August 19, 1993). See also
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Reviews and Revocation of Orders
in Part: Certain Corrosion–Resistant
Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Germany, 64 FR 51292 (September 22,
1999), and Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Reviews and
Revocation of Orders in Part: Certain
Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Canada and Germany, 71
FR 14498 (March 22, 2006).
On August 17, 2006, ThyssenKrupp
Steel North America, Inc.
(‘‘ThyssenKrupp’’), a U.S. importer of
the subject merchandise, requested a
changed circumstances review to
exclude from the antidumping duty
order on corrosion–resistant steel from
Germany imports meeting the following
description: electrolytically zinc coated
flat steel products, with a coating mass
between 35 and 72 grams per meter
squared on each side; with a thickness
range of 0.67 mm or more but not more
than 2.95 mm and width 817 mm or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66163
more but not over 1830 mm; having the
following chemical composition
(percent by weight): carbon not over
0.08, silicon not over 0.25, manganese
not over 0.9, phosphorous not over
0.025, sulfur not over 0.012, chromium
not over 0.1, titanium not over 0.005
and niobium not over 0.05; with a
minimum yield strength of 310 Mpa and
a minimum tensile strength of 390 Mpa;
additionally coated on one or both sides
with an organic coating containing not
less than 30% and not more than 60%
zinc and free of hexavalent chrome. See
ThyssenKrupp letter to the Department
dated August 17, 2006.1 In addition,
Mittal Steel USA (‘‘Mittal Steel’’), a
major domestic corrosion–resistant steel
producer, submitted a letter to the
Department expressing a lack of interest
in continuing to have the product in
question subject to this antidumping
duty order.2 See Mittal Steel letter to the
Department dated August 18, 2006.
In response to the request made by the
‘‘interested party’’ within the meaning
of section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
ThyssenKrupp, and the expressed lack
of interest from Mittal Steel, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of a changed circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order
on corrosion–resistant steel from
Germany on September 12, 2006. See
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain
Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Germany, 71 FR 53653
(September 12, 2006) (Initiation Notice).
On September 27, 2006, ThyssenKrupp
stated that the effective date for the
exclusion should be August 1, 2005. In
the Initiation Notice, the Department
indicated that interested parties could
submit comments for consideration in
the Department’s preliminary results no
later than 15 days after publication of
the initiation of this review. The
Department did not receive comments
from interested parties. Absent any
comments, the Department
1 DaimlerChrylser Corporation
(‘‘DaimlerChrysler’’), a domestic customer of
corrosion-resistant steel, also submitted letters to
the Department pre-dating ThyssenKrupp’s request,
indicating that it had contacted United States Steel
Corporation, Mittal Steel, AK Steel, and Nucor
Corporation, (domestic interested parties) and
determined they are not interested in maintaining
the antidumping duty order with respect to the
product in question. See Letters to the Department
from DaimlerChrysler dated June 22, 2006, and July
18, 2006, respectively.
2 On September 26, 2006, Mittal Steel submitted
a letter to the Department clarifying minor
discrepancies in its August 18, 2006, submission
regarding the product specifications of the product
in question it is no longer interested in having
covered by the antidumping duty order on
corrosion-resistant steel from Germany.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66162-66163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19060]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Request for public input.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is inviting all interested members of the
public to provide input into the development of the USDA Forest Service
Open Space Conservation Strategy and Implementation Plan, which will
help shape the agency's strategic role in a national effort to conserve
open space. The Forest Service is interested in addressing the effects
of the loss of open space on private forests; on the National Forests
and Grasslands and surrounding landscape; and on forests in cities,
suburbs, and towns. Input for the Strategy and Implementation Plan
should focus on programs, research, partnerships, and/or policy
recommendations that could be developed to conserve open space. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more background on the loss of
open space and the Strategy and Implementation Plan.
DATES: The Forest Service will review public input received no later
than December 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Claire Harper, USDA Forest Service,
Cooperative Forestry, Mail Stop Code 1123, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250-1123; via electronic mail to
openspace@fs.fed.us; or via facsimile to (202) 205-1271. The agency
cannot confirm receipt of comments. All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for
public inspection. The public may inspect comments during regular
business hours at the office of the Cooperative Forestry Staff, 4th
Floor SE., Yates Building, 201 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC.
Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to (202) 205-1389 to facilitate
entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about the Open
Space Conservation Strategy and Implementation Plan and the loss of
open space, contact Claire Harper, USDA Forest Service, Cooperative
Forestry, by telephone at (202) 205-1389 or by electronic mail at
openspace@fs.fed.us. For a summary of the Forest Service's current
research, programs, and resources available to facilitate open space
conservation, please review the Forest Service's publication entitled
``Cooperating Across Boundaries: Partnerships to Conserve Open Space in
Rural America.'' Electronic copies of this publication are available at
https://www.fs.fed.us/projects/four-threats/documents/
cooperatingacrossboundaries.pdf, and hardcopies are available by
contacting Claire Harper at openspace@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 2003, Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth identified the loss of
open space as one of four great threats facing our nation's forests and
grasslands. Loss of open space is an issue that affects the
sustainability of both the National Forests and Grasslands and private
forests. Open space--including public and private land, wilderness and
working land--provides a multitude of public benefits and ecosystem
services we all need and enjoy. Three interrelated trends of
conversion, fragmentation, and parcelization are jeopardizing the long
term health and function of forests, limiting management options, and
reducing opportunities for public enjoyment and use. To address the
loss of open space threat, the Forest Service is building a national
strategy to identify how the agency plans to focus its efforts on the
issue. This strategy will provide actions and policy recommendations to
conserve open space, with an emphasis on partnerships and collaborative
approaches.
II. Open Space Conservation Strategy and Implementation Plan
The Forest Service recognizes that it is not the only contributor
to open space conservation; it is only one among many. The Forest
Service also acknowledges that the agency's role in open space
conservation is not to regulate development or land use, but is to
provide expertise, resources, information, and programs. To help
prioritize and focus the agency's efforts, the Forest Service plans to
develop and refine an Open Space Conservation Strategy and
Implementation Plan to address the loss of open space.
Input for the Strategy and Implementation Plan should focus on
programs, research, partnerships and/or policy recommendations that
could be
[[Page 66163]]
developed to conserve open space. Specifically, input regarding the
following three questions is most useful:
1. How can the Forest Service protect land from conversion to other
uses;
2. How can the Forest Service assist private landowners and
communities in maintaining and managing their land as sustainable
forests and grasslands; and
3. How can the Forest Service mitigate the impacts of existing and
new developments.
By receiving input from people with diverse interests and
perspectives, the agency hopes to attain an array of viewpoints and
ideas regarding the Open Space Conservation Strategy and Implementation
Plan. Feedback from a range of interested individuals will assist the
agency in developing a well-informed, focused, and effective strategy
to address the loss of open space threat.
Dated: November 2, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E6-19060 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P