Wisconsin Public Power Inc., Municipal Wholesale Power Group, and Great Lakes Utilities, Complainants v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co., Respondent; Notice of Complaint, 65802 [E6-18926]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
65802
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 217 / Thursday, November 9, 2006 / Notices
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–18934 Filed 11–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL07–14–000]
Wisconsin Public Power Inc.,
Municipal Wholesale Power Group,
and Great Lakes Utilities,
Complainants v. Wisconsin Power &
Light Co., Respondent; Notice of
Complaint
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
November 2, 2006.
Take notice that on November 1,
2006, Wisconsin Public Power Inc.,
Municipal Wholesale Power Group, and
Great Lakes Utilities (collectively,
Wisconsin Publics) filed a complaint
against Wisconsin Power & Light Co.,
(WPL) pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA). Wisconsin
Publics states that in Docket Nos. ER06–
1517 and ER06–1518 WPL has made
filings under section 205 of the FPA to
change its rates, terms, and conditions
for service to Wisconsin Publics WPL’s
PR–1 Tariff and W–3A Tariff,
respectively. Wisconsin Publics notes
that it has recently submitted extensive
protests regarding both of those filings,
and has requested consolidation of
Docket Nos. ER06–1517 and ER06–1518.
Wisconsin Publics states that this
complaint also seeks an investigation
and refund effective date under section
206 of the FPA, and asks that this third
proceeding be consolidated with both of
the ER Dockets.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Nov 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible online at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
November 21, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–18926 Filed 11–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP07–4–000]
Mississippi Hub, L.L.C.; Notice of
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Assessment for the Proposed
Mississippi Hub Gas Storage Project
and Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues
November 3, 2006.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of a
proposal by Mississippi Hub, L.L.C. (MS
HUB) to construct, own, and operate a
new salt cavern natural gas storage
facility in Simpson and Jefferson Davis
Counties, Mississippi.1 The proposal
would provide for the injection, storage,
and withdrawal of natural gas in two
underground caverns created in the
Bond Salt Dome formation using a
solution mining (leaching) process.
Once complete, the project would
provide approximately 12 billion cubic
feet (Bcf) of working gas storage
capacity, capable of injecting 600
million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) and
delivering gas at maximum rates up to
1,200 MMcfd. Proposed project facilities
1 MS HUB’s application was filed with the
Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act
and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
include gas compression and
withdrawal facilities, a leaching plant,
an electrical substation, raw water
withdrawal and brine disposal facilities,
approximately 11.4 miles of pipeline
and utility corridor, metering facilities
and ancillary equipment.
This notice announces the opening of
the public comment period that will be
used to gather environmental input from
the public and interested agencies on
the project. Comments are requested by
December 4, 2006.
This notice is being sent to potentially
affected landowners; Federal, state, and
local government agencies; elected
officials; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American Tribes,
other interested parties; local libraries
and newspapers. State and local
government representatives are asked to
notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern. If you are a
landowner receiving this notice, you
may be contacted by a MS HUB
company representative about the
acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed
facilities. The company would seek to
negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the project is
approved by the Commission, that
approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the natural gas company
could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ was attached to the project
notice MS HUB provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a
number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings. It is
available for viewing on the FERC
Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov).
Summary of the Proposed Project
MS HUB seeks authority to construct
and operate the following:
(1) Natural Gas Handling Facility Site;
Simpson County (approximately 80
acres). The facility would include two
storage caverns; a 29,205 horsepower
compressor station; separation,
dehydration, metering, and appurtenant
facilities; leaching plant; one freshwater
well; and a non-jurisdictional electrical
substation. Solution mining of the
caverns would occur over an
approximate five-year time span.
(2) Primary Raw Water Withdrawal
and Brine Disposal Facility
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 217 (Thursday, November 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 65802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18926]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL07-14-000]
Wisconsin Public Power Inc., Municipal Wholesale Power Group, and
Great Lakes Utilities, Complainants v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.,
Respondent; Notice of Complaint
November 2, 2006.
Take notice that on November 1, 2006, Wisconsin Public Power Inc.,
Municipal Wholesale Power Group, and Great Lakes Utilities
(collectively, Wisconsin Publics) filed a complaint against Wisconsin
Power & Light Co., (WPL) pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power
Act (FPA). Wisconsin Publics states that in Docket Nos. ER06-1517 and
ER06-1518 WPL has made filings under section 205 of the FPA to change
its rates, terms, and conditions for service to Wisconsin Publics WPL's
PR-1 Tariff and W-3A Tariff, respectively. Wisconsin Publics notes that
it has recently submitted extensive protests regarding both of those
filings, and has requested consolidation of Docket Nos. ER06-1517 and
ER06-1518. Wisconsin Publics states that this complaint also seeks an
investigation and refund effective date under section 206 of the FPA,
and asks that this third proceeding be consolidated with both of the ER
Dockets.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible online at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on November 21, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18926 Filed 11-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
