Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Harbor Redevelopment Project, Moss Landing Harbor, California, 64944-64946 [E6-18690]
Download as PDF
64944
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 214 / Monday, November 6, 2006 / Notices
maximum of 300 harbor seals and 3,050
elephant seals will be captured or
handled per year over a five year period,
and an estimated 300 elephant seals,
5,150 harbor seals, 600 California sea
lions, and five northern fur seals will be
incidentally disturbed during pinniped
research operations.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of these
applications to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: October 31, 2006.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–18683 Filed 11–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 100406A]
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Harbor
Redevelopment Project, Moss Landing
Harbor, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an
incidental take authorization.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) as amended, notification is
hereby given that an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) has
been issued to the Moss Landing Harbor
District (MLHD), to take small numbers
of Pacific harbor seals and California sea
lions, by harassment, incidental to the
harbor redevelopment project in Moss
Landing Harbor, California.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from November 1, 2006 until October
31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application,
IHA, and supporting documents for this
action may be obtained by writing to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Nov 03, 2006
Jkt 211001
137, or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS, (562)
980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will be
small, have a negligible impact on the
species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses, and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On April 24, 2006, NMFS received a
request from the Terrestrial and Aquatic
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Biological Resources, on behalf of
MLHD, to take small numbers of Pacific
harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi)
and California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) incidental to the North
Harbor Redevelopment Project in Moss
Landing Harbor, Monterey County,
California.
The project includes construction of a
100–ft (30.5–m) long by 90–ft (27.4–m)
wide boat ramp, a 5,000–square foot
(464.5–m2) public wharf with
pedestrian promenade and seating areas,
and installation of a 171–ft long (52.1–
m) by 10–ft (3.1–m) wide floating dock.
The total proposed project site is 4.5
acres (18,211.5 m2). The construction
phase of the redevelopment would
involve driving a total of 72 piles: 9 for
the boat ramp, 53 for the public wharf
and promenade, and 10 for the floating
dock. Installation of the pilings would
most likely be from a land-based driver,
however, a barge may be used for
installation. The pilings will be
concrete, 16–inch square for the wharf
and the boat launch ramp boarding
floats, and 20–inch square for the dock.
An impact hammer is required for
installation of the piles. The energy
output levels of the impact hammer are
approximately 48 – 94 kiloJoules (kJ) (or
35,381 – 69,458 foot-pound force (ftlbs)), depending on the setting. The
hammer would be operating at the rate
of 36 – 52 blows per minute. The
underwater noise level is measured at
approximately between 165 – 175 dB re
1 microPa rms at 10 m (32.8 ft), and 155
– 170 dB re 1 microPa rms at 20 m (65.6
ft). It takes approximately 5 – 20
minutes drive time to install each pile,
depending on the substrate
encountered. Therefore, the maximum
time required to install all piles would
be 24 hours. The pile driving is
estimated to be completed within 2 – 3
months. The proposed project would
start in fall 2006.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt and request for 30–
day public comment on the application
and the proposed authorization was
published in the Federal Resister on
September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53086). No
comments were received during the 30–
day public comment period. NMFS
requested the review of the Marine
Mammal Commission (the Commission)
for the IHA application and proposed
authorization. The Commission
concurred with NMFS’ determination
that the proposed activities are unlikely
to have a significant impact on the
affected marine mammal populations.
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 214 / Monday, November 6, 2006 / Notices
Description of the Marine Mammals
Potentially Affected by the Activity
The affected species of marine
mammals that may occur near the
proposed project site are Pacific harbor
seals and California sea lions. General
information on these marine mammal
species can be found in Caretta et al.
(2006), which is available at the
following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
po2005.pdf. None of the marine
mammals species found in the proposed
project areas is listed under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) or
designated as depleted under the
MMPA. Additional information on the
abundance and occurrence of these
species within or close to the proposed
project area is presented below.
Pacific harbor seal
Pacific harbor seals are mainly seen
on the sand bar at the North area of the
harbor (North Harbor), which is about
575 ft (175.3 m) west from the proposed
project area, across a Federal navigation
channel. They are also seen along the
boat dock area, and swimming to and
from the ocean. The North Harbor sand
bar is not a typical Pacific harbor seal
pupping area. The closest known seal
pupping area is over 0.5 mile (0.8 km)
east of the proposed project area at Seal
Bend in Elkhorn Slough (NMFS, 2004).
The number of Pacific harbor seals
varies seasonally and with the time of
day. They are most abundant during the
day with approximately 20 - 100
individuals at the North Harbor sand
bar, but leave the sand bar in the
evening to feed in Monterey Bay. The
number of seals are most abundant
during the pupping and molting season
from May to August.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
California sea lion
California sea lions have been seen on
the North Harbor docks, but their
occurrence within the proposed project
area is rare. Usually there are fewer than
2 individuals in the vicinity of Moss
Landing Harbor (L. McIntyre, MLHD,
2006). Most of the sea lions in the
Monterey Bay area are males of varying
age classes that arrive in early fall from
their southern breeding ground
(Monterey Bay Aquarium, 1999). Many
individuals remain over the course of
the winter until the following spring,
with just a few sea lions staying through
the summer. There are no breeding areas
for the California sea lion located in the
Monterey Bay area, and most
individuals migrate to offshore breeding
sites in southern California and Mexico
(NMFS, 2004).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Nov 03, 2006
Jkt 211001
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
and Their Habitat
Construction of the boat ramp, public
wharf and promenade, and floating
docks has the potential to result in Level
B behavioral harassment of Pacific
harbor seals and California sea lions that
may be swimming, foraging, or resting
in the project vicinity while pile driving
is being conducted. The impact to these
marine mammals is expected to be
disturbance by the presence of workers,
construction noise, and possibly
construction vessel traffic if pile driving
is to be conducted from a barge.
Disturbances could alter seal and sea
lion behaviors and cause the animals to
temporarily disperse from the area, or to
flush and possibly return at a later time
or could result in temporary use of an
alternate haul out site in Monterey Bay.
Noise from pile driving is expected to
be much louder than all other noises
from the construction. However, the
impact hammer being selected has
energy levels at 48–94 kJ (35,381–69,458
ft-lbs). These energy levels are
significantly less than either of the two
pile drivers being used on the San
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SF–
OBB) (see 68 FR 64595, November 14,
2003), which are 500 kJ and 1,700 kJ. As
a result, airborne and underwater
impact zones for marine mammals (and
other aquatic life) will be significantly
smaller than at SF–OBB.
Based on underwater noise levels
measured in 2004 during a separate
project at Pier 40 in San Francisco, the
hammer’s impulses were recorded
approximately between 165–175 dB re 1
microPa rms at 10 m (32.8 ft), and 155–
170 dB re 1 microPa rms at 20 m (65.6
ft) from the pile. These levels are
significantly below 190 dB re 1 microPa
rms, the level NMFS uses to estimate
Level A harassment of pinnipeds and
the onset of temporary threshold shift
(TTS) in pinniped hearing (see 68 FR
64595, November 14, 2003).
A self-monitoring program was also
conducted by a contractor in July 2006
to obtain airborne noise levels from pile
driving. Time-averaged acoustic values
in air ranged from 80 to 90 dB re 20
microPa, with peak discrete values
approaching 100 dB re 20 microPa at
250 feet (76 m) from the sound source
(Sea Engineering Inc., 2006). Studies
have shown that when exposed to
sound levels between 98.9 and 101 dB
(re 20 microPa) from rocket launch,
harbor seals responded by fleeing into
the water but many returned to land
within several hours (Stewart, 1993).
Ringed seals (Phoca hispida) exhibited
little or no reaction to pipe-driving
noise measured at 112 and 96 dB re 20
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64945
microPa and 90 dB re 20 microPa2s
(Blackwell et al., 2004).
Mitigation
The following mitigation measures are
required under the IHA that has been
issued to MLHD for construction
activities, including pile driving,
associated with the harbor
redevelopment project at Moss Landing
Harbor. NMFS believes that the
implementation of these mitigation
measures will reduce impacts to marine
mammals to the lowest level
practicable.
Time and Duration
The pile driving of the construction
will be completed before December
2006 to avoid the migrating gray whales
(Eschrichtius robustus). Construction
activities, including pile driving, will
only take place during daylight hours
between 7 am to 5 pm, when marine
mammal monitoring prior to and during
the pile driving can be effectively
implemented.
Establishment of Safety Zones
Before any pile driving, a clearly
marked 250–ft (76 m) radius safety zone
for Pacific harbor seals and California
sea lions will be established. The safety
zone would be marked by buoys for easy
monitoring. At these distances,
underwater sound pressure levels
(SPLs) are expected to be significantly
reduced from 165 - 175 dB re 1 microPa
rms measured at 10 m (32.8 ft), and
airborne noise levels are expected to be
about 80 - 90 dB re 20 microPa. These
SPLs are not believed to cause Level A
harassment or onset of TTS (Level B
harassment). A 500–ft radius safety zone
was proposed in the proposed IHA (71
FR 53086), however, acoustic
monitoring data show that it is overly
conservative and would be difficult to
monitor such a large area. Based on inwater and in-air acoustic monitoring
data, NMFS believes that a 250–ft radius
safety zone is sufficient to prevent Level
A harassment and onset of TTS.
Marine mammal observers (MMOs) on
a boat will survey the safety zone to
ensure that no marine mammals are
seen within the zone before pile driving
begins. If marine mammals are found
within the safety zone, pile driving will
be delayed until they move out of the
area. If a marine mammal is seen above
the water and then dives below, pile
driving will wait 15 minutes and if no
marine mammals are seen by the
observer in that time it will be assumed
that the animal has moved beyond the
safety zone. This 15–minute criterion is
based on scientific evidence that harbor
seals in San Francisco Bay dive for a
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
64946
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 214 / Monday, November 6, 2006 / Notices
mean time of 0.50 minutes to 3.33
minutes (Harvey and Torok, 1994).
Once pile driving begins and an
animal is seen or believed to entered the
250 ft (76 m) radius safety zone, the
contractor must suspend pile driving
and wait till the animal leaves the safety
zone, or 15 minutes after the last
sighting of the animal, before pile
driving starts.
Soft Start
Although marine mammals will be
protected from Level A harassment by
establishment of a safety zone of 250–
ft (76 m) radius, mitigation may not be
100 percent effective at all times in
locating marine mammals. In order to
provide additional protection to marine
mammals near the project area by
allowing marine mammals to vacate the
area, thus further reducing the
incidence of Level B harassment from
startling marine mammals with a
sudden intensive sound, MLHD will
implement a ‘‘soft start’’ practice when
startup pile driving. By implementing
the ‘‘soft start’’ practice, pile driving
would be initiated at an energy level
less than full capacity (i.e.,
approximately 40–60 percent energy
levels) for at least 5 minutes before
gradually escalate to full capacity. This
would ensure that, although not
expected, any pinnipeds that are
undetected during safety zone
monitoring will not be injured.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Compliance with Equipment Noise
Standards
To mitigate noise levels and,
therefore, impacts to Pacific harbor seals
and California sea lions, all construction
equipment will comply as much as
possible with applicable equipment
noise standards of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and
all construction equipment will have
noise control devices no less effective
than those provided on the original
equipment.
Monitoring and Reporting
MLHD must implement a monitoring
plan that would collect data for each
distinct marine mammal species
observed during pile driving at the Moss
Landing Harbor construction site.
Marine mammal behavior, overall
numbers of individuals observed,
frequency of observation, and any
behavioral changes due to the pile
driving will be recorded.
Monitoring will be conducted by
qualified NMFS-approved biologists.
Binoculars and range finders will be
provided to MMOs for accurately
identifying species and determining
distances.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:31 Nov 03, 2006
Jkt 211001
Monitoring will begin prior to the first
day of the pile driving to establish
baseline data, and occur during the
entire period when pile driving is
underway, and continue for 30 minutes
after the pile driving. Post construction
monitoring will also be conducted for a
period of one day upon completion of
pile driving to identify any change of
pinniped behaviors.
Before the startup of the pile driving,
MMOs would visually survey the area to
confirm the safety zone is clear of any
marine mammals. Pile driving will not
begin until the safety zone is clear of
marine mammals. Monitoring would
continue by the observers on a boat
during the entire period of pile driving.
However, as described in the Mitigation
section, once pile driving begins,
operations will continue uninterrupted
until that pile is installed. However, if
driving of a pile is completed and a
marine mammal is sighted within the
designated safety zone prior to
commencement of the next pile driving,
the observer(s) must notify the pile
driver (or other authorized individual)
immediately and follow the mitigation
requirements as outlined previously (see
Mitigation).
MLHD will submit a final report to
NMFS 90 days after completion of the
project. The final report will include
data collected for each distinct marine
mammal species observed in the
vicinity of the construction area during
pile driving. Marine mammal behavior,
overall numbers of individuals
observed, frequency of observation, and
any behavioral changes due to the pile
driving would also be included in the
final report.
ESA
Based on a review conducted by
NMFS biologists, no ESA-listed species
are expected to occur in the proposed
action area. NMFS has determined that
no species listed under the ESA are
likely to be affected and, therefore, a
section 7 consultation is not warranted.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) on the issuance of an
IHA for the taking of marine mammals
incidental to demolition of the
Sandholdt Road Bridge and
construction of a new bridge in Moss
Landing, California, in 2004 and made
a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) on December 21, 2004. The
proposed action discussed in this
document is not substantially different
from the action analyzed in the 2004
EA, and a reference search has indicated
that no significant new scientific
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information or analyses have been
developed in the past 2 years that would
warrant new NEPA documentation.
Therefore, a new EA is not warranted
for the proposed project.
Determinations
For the reasons discussed in this
document and identified supporting
documents, NMFS has determined that
the impact of pile driving associated
with Moss Landing Harbor
redevelopment project would result, at
worst, in the Level B harassment of
small numbers of Pacific harbor seals
and California sea lions in the vicinity
of the proposed project area. While
behavioral modifications, including
temporarily vacating the area during the
pile driving, may be made by these
species to avoid the resultant visual and
acoustic disturbance, the availability of
alternate areas near Monterey Bay and
haul-out sites (including pupping sites)
and feeding areas within the Bay has led
NMFS to determine that this action will
have a negligible impact on small
numbers of Pacific harbor seal and
California sea lion populations near the
proposed project area.
In addition, no take by Level A
harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes
should be at the lowest level practicable
due to incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this
document.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to MLHD for
the potential harassment of small
numbers of harbor seals and California
sea lions incidental to Moss Landing
Harbor redevelopment project in Moss
Landing, California, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: October 31, 2006.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–18690 Filed 11–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 101706F ]
National Marine Fisheries Service;
Notice of Availability of the Interim
Final Ten Year Plan for the NOAA
Aquaculture Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 214 (Monday, November 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64944-64946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18690]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 100406A]
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Harbor Redevelopment Project, Moss Landing Harbor, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental take authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given that an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) has been issued to the Moss Landing
Harbor District (MLHD), to take small numbers of Pacific harbor seals
and California sea lions, by harassment, incidental to the harbor
redevelopment project in Moss Landing Harbor, California.
DATES: This authorization is effective from November 1, 2006 until
October 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the application, IHA, and supporting documents
for this action may be obtained by writing to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225, or by telephoning the contact listed
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext
137, or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking
will be small, have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s),
will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that the permissible
methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation,
monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ''...an impact
resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of the authorization.
Summary of Request
On April 24, 2006, NMFS received a request from the Terrestrial and
Aquatic Biological Resources, on behalf of MLHD, to take small numbers
of Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) and California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus) incidental to the North Harbor
Redevelopment Project in Moss Landing Harbor, Monterey County,
California.
The project includes construction of a 100-ft (30.5-m) long by 90-
ft (27.4-m) wide boat ramp, a 5,000-square foot (464.5-m\2\) public
wharf with pedestrian promenade and seating areas, and installation of
a 171-ft long (52.1-m) by 10-ft (3.1-m) wide floating dock. The total
proposed project site is 4.5 acres (18,211.5 m\2\). The construction
phase of the redevelopment would involve driving a total of 72 piles: 9
for the boat ramp, 53 for the public wharf and promenade, and 10 for
the floating dock. Installation of the pilings would most likely be
from a land-based driver, however, a barge may be used for
installation. The pilings will be concrete, 16-inch square for the
wharf and the boat launch ramp boarding floats, and 20-inch square for
the dock.
An impact hammer is required for installation of the piles. The
energy output levels of the impact hammer are approximately 48 - 94
kiloJoules (kJ) (or 35,381 - 69,458 foot-pound force (ft-lbs)),
depending on the setting. The hammer would be operating at the rate of
36 - 52 blows per minute. The underwater noise level is measured at
approximately between 165 - 175 dB re 1 microPa rms at 10 m (32.8 ft),
and 155 - 170 dB re 1 microPa rms at 20 m (65.6 ft). It takes
approximately 5 - 20 minutes drive time to install each pile, depending
on the substrate encountered. Therefore, the maximum time required to
install all piles would be 24 hours. The pile driving is estimated to
be completed within 2 - 3 months. The proposed project would start in
fall 2006.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt and request for 30-day public comment on the
application and the proposed authorization was published in the Federal
Resister on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53086). No comments were received
during the 30-day public comment period. NMFS requested the review of
the Marine Mammal Commission (the Commission) for the IHA application
and proposed authorization. The Commission concurred with NMFS'
determination that the proposed activities are unlikely to have a
significant impact on the affected marine mammal populations.
[[Page 64945]]
Description of the Marine Mammals Potentially Affected by the Activity
The affected species of marine mammals that may occur near the
proposed project site are Pacific harbor seals and California sea
lions. General information on these marine mammal species can be found
in Caretta et al. (2006), which is available at the following URL:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/po2005.pdf. None of the marine
mammals species found in the proposed project areas is listed under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) or designated as depleted under the MMPA.
Additional information on the abundance and occurrence of these species
within or close to the proposed project area is presented below.
Pacific harbor seal
Pacific harbor seals are mainly seen on the sand bar at the North
area of the harbor (North Harbor), which is about 575 ft (175.3 m) west
from the proposed project area, across a Federal navigation channel.
They are also seen along the boat dock area, and swimming to and from
the ocean. The North Harbor sand bar is not a typical Pacific harbor
seal pupping area. The closest known seal pupping area is over 0.5 mile
(0.8 km) east of the proposed project area at Seal Bend in Elkhorn
Slough (NMFS, 2004).
The number of Pacific harbor seals varies seasonally and with the
time of day. They are most abundant during the day with approximately
20 - 100 individuals at the North Harbor sand bar, but leave the sand
bar in the evening to feed in Monterey Bay. The number of seals are
most abundant during the pupping and molting season from May to August.
California sea lion
California sea lions have been seen on the North Harbor docks, but
their occurrence within the proposed project area is rare. Usually
there are fewer than 2 individuals in the vicinity of Moss Landing
Harbor (L. McIntyre, MLHD, 2006). Most of the sea lions in the Monterey
Bay area are males of varying age classes that arrive in early fall
from their southern breeding ground (Monterey Bay Aquarium, 1999). Many
individuals remain over the course of the winter until the following
spring, with just a few sea lions staying through the summer. There are
no breeding areas for the California sea lion located in the Monterey
Bay area, and most individuals migrate to offshore breeding sites in
southern California and Mexico (NMFS, 2004).
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
Construction of the boat ramp, public wharf and promenade, and
floating docks has the potential to result in Level B behavioral
harassment of Pacific harbor seals and California sea lions that may be
swimming, foraging, or resting in the project vicinity while pile
driving is being conducted. The impact to these marine mammals is
expected to be disturbance by the presence of workers, construction
noise, and possibly construction vessel traffic if pile driving is to
be conducted from a barge. Disturbances could alter seal and sea lion
behaviors and cause the animals to temporarily disperse from the area,
or to flush and possibly return at a later time or could result in
temporary use of an alternate haul out site in Monterey Bay.
Noise from pile driving is expected to be much louder than all
other noises from the construction. However, the impact hammer being
selected has energy levels at 48-94 kJ (35,381-69,458 ft-lbs). These
energy levels are significantly less than either of the two pile
drivers being used on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SF-OBB)
(see 68 FR 64595, November 14, 2003), which are 500 kJ and 1,700 kJ. As
a result, airborne and underwater impact zones for marine mammals (and
other aquatic life) will be significantly smaller than at SF-OBB.
Based on underwater noise levels measured in 2004 during a separate
project at Pier 40 in San Francisco, the hammer's impulses were
recorded approximately between 165-175 dB re 1 microPa rms at 10 m
(32.8 ft), and 155-170 dB re 1 microPa rms at 20 m (65.6 ft) from the
pile. These levels are significantly below 190 dB re 1 microPa rms, the
level NMFS uses to estimate Level A harassment of pinnipeds and the
onset of temporary threshold shift (TTS) in pinniped hearing (see 68 FR
64595, November 14, 2003).
A self-monitoring program was also conducted by a contractor in
July 2006 to obtain airborne noise levels from pile driving. Time-
averaged acoustic values in air ranged from 80 to 90 dB re 20 microPa,
with peak discrete values approaching 100 dB re 20 microPa at 250 feet
(76 m) from the sound source (Sea Engineering Inc., 2006). Studies have
shown that when exposed to sound levels between 98.9 and 101 dB (re 20
microPa) from rocket launch, harbor seals responded by fleeing into the
water but many returned to land within several hours (Stewart, 1993).
Ringed seals (Phoca hispida) exhibited little or no reaction to pipe-
driving noise measured at 112 and 96 dB re 20 microPa and 90 dB re 20
microPa\2\s (Blackwell et al., 2004).
Mitigation
The following mitigation measures are required under the IHA that
has been issued to MLHD for construction activities, including pile
driving, associated with the harbor redevelopment project at Moss
Landing Harbor. NMFS believes that the implementation of these
mitigation measures will reduce impacts to marine mammals to the lowest
level practicable.
Time and Duration
The pile driving of the construction will be completed before
December 2006 to avoid the migrating gray whales (Eschrichtius
robustus). Construction activities, including pile driving, will only
take place during daylight hours between 7 am to 5 pm, when marine
mammal monitoring prior to and during the pile driving can be
effectively implemented.
Establishment of Safety Zones
Before any pile driving, a clearly marked 250-ft (76 m) radius
safety zone for Pacific harbor seals and California sea lions will be
established. The safety zone would be marked by buoys for easy
monitoring. At these distances, underwater sound pressure levels (SPLs)
are expected to be significantly reduced from 165 - 175 dB re 1 microPa
rms measured at 10 m (32.8 ft), and airborne noise levels are expected
to be about 80 - 90 dB re 20 microPa. These SPLs are not believed to
cause Level A harassment or onset of TTS (Level B harassment). A 500-ft
radius safety zone was proposed in the proposed IHA (71 FR 53086),
however, acoustic monitoring data show that it is overly conservative
and would be difficult to monitor such a large area. Based on in-water
and in-air acoustic monitoring data, NMFS believes that a 250-ft radius
safety zone is sufficient to prevent Level A harassment and onset of
TTS.
Marine mammal observers (MMOs) on a boat will survey the safety
zone to ensure that no marine mammals are seen within the zone before
pile driving begins. If marine mammals are found within the safety
zone, pile driving will be delayed until they move out of the area. If
a marine mammal is seen above the water and then dives below, pile
driving will wait 15 minutes and if no marine mammals are seen by the
observer in that time it will be assumed that the animal has moved
beyond the safety zone. This 15-minute criterion is based on scientific
evidence that harbor seals in San Francisco Bay dive for a
[[Page 64946]]
mean time of 0.50 minutes to 3.33 minutes (Harvey and Torok, 1994).
Once pile driving begins and an animal is seen or believed to
entered the 250 ft (76 m) radius safety zone, the contractor must
suspend pile driving and wait till the animal leaves the safety zone,
or 15 minutes after the last sighting of the animal, before pile
driving starts.
Soft Start
Although marine mammals will be protected from Level A harassment
by establishment of a safety zone of 250-ft (76 m) radius, mitigation
may not be 100 percent effective at all times in locating marine
mammals. In order to provide additional protection to marine mammals
near the project area by allowing marine mammals to vacate the area,
thus further reducing the incidence of Level B harassment from
startling marine mammals with a sudden intensive sound, MLHD will
implement a ``soft start'' practice when startup pile driving. By
implementing the ``soft start'' practice, pile driving would be
initiated at an energy level less than full capacity (i.e.,
approximately 40-60 percent energy levels) for at least 5 minutes
before gradually escalate to full capacity. This would ensure that,
although not expected, any pinnipeds that are undetected during safety
zone monitoring will not be injured.
Compliance with Equipment Noise Standards
To mitigate noise levels and, therefore, impacts to Pacific harbor
seals and California sea lions, all construction equipment will comply
as much as possible with applicable equipment noise standards of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and all construction equipment
will have noise control devices no less effective than those provided
on the original equipment.
Monitoring and Reporting
MLHD must implement a monitoring plan that would collect data for
each distinct marine mammal species observed during pile driving at the
Moss Landing Harbor construction site. Marine mammal behavior, overall
numbers of individuals observed, frequency of observation, and any
behavioral changes due to the pile driving will be recorded.
Monitoring will be conducted by qualified NMFS-approved biologists.
Binoculars and range finders will be provided to MMOs for accurately
identifying species and determining distances.
Monitoring will begin prior to the first day of the pile driving to
establish baseline data, and occur during the entire period when pile
driving is underway, and continue for 30 minutes after the pile
driving. Post construction monitoring will also be conducted for a
period of one day upon completion of pile driving to identify any
change of pinniped behaviors.
Before the startup of the pile driving, MMOs would visually survey
the area to confirm the safety zone is clear of any marine mammals.
Pile driving will not begin until the safety zone is clear of marine
mammals. Monitoring would continue by the observers on a boat during
the entire period of pile driving. However, as described in the
Mitigation section, once pile driving begins, operations will continue
uninterrupted until that pile is installed. However, if driving of a
pile is completed and a marine mammal is sighted within the designated
safety zone prior to commencement of the next pile driving, the
observer(s) must notify the pile driver (or other authorized
individual) immediately and follow the mitigation requirements as
outlined previously (see Mitigation).
MLHD will submit a final report to NMFS 90 days after completion of
the project. The final report will include data collected for each
distinct marine mammal species observed in the vicinity of the
construction area during pile driving. Marine mammal behavior, overall
numbers of individuals observed, frequency of observation, and any
behavioral changes due to the pile driving would also be included in
the final report.
ESA
Based on a review conducted by NMFS biologists, no ESA-listed
species are expected to occur in the proposed action area. NMFS has
determined that no species listed under the ESA are likely to be
affected and, therefore, a section 7 consultation is not warranted.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the issuance of
an IHA for the taking of marine mammals incidental to demolition of the
Sandholdt Road Bridge and construction of a new bridge in Moss Landing,
California, in 2004 and made a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
on December 21, 2004. The proposed action discussed in this document is
not substantially different from the action analyzed in the 2004 EA,
and a reference search has indicated that no significant new scientific
information or analyses have been developed in the past 2 years that
would warrant new NEPA documentation. Therefore, a new EA is not
warranted for the proposed project.
Determinations
For the reasons discussed in this document and identified
supporting documents, NMFS has determined that the impact of pile
driving associated with Moss Landing Harbor redevelopment project would
result, at worst, in the Level B harassment of small numbers of Pacific
harbor seals and California sea lions in the vicinity of the proposed
project area. While behavioral modifications, including temporarily
vacating the area during the pile driving, may be made by these species
to avoid the resultant visual and acoustic disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas near Monterey Bay and haul-out sites
(including pupping sites) and feeding areas within the Bay has led NMFS
to determine that this action will have a negligible impact on small
numbers of Pacific harbor seal and California sea lion populations near
the proposed project area.
In addition, no take by Level A harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes should be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation measures mentioned
previously in this document.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to MLHD for the potential harassment of
small numbers of harbor seals and California sea lions incidental to
Moss Landing Harbor redevelopment project in Moss Landing, California,
provided the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Dated: October 31, 2006.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-18690 Filed 11-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S