Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Privacy Act; Implementation, 64632-64633 [E6-18592]

Download as PDF 64632 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 213 / Friday, November 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 312 Privacy. I Accordingly, 32 CFR part 312 is amended as follows: for the original primary systems of records which they are a part. (3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7). (4) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent (1) such provisions have been identified and an exemption claimed for the original record and (2) the purposes underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly classified information relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a. Dated: October 30, 2006. C.R. Choate, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. E6–18588 Filed 11–2–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P PART 312—OIG PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE I 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 312 continues to read as follows: 32 CFR Part 318 Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). [Docket No. DOD–2006–OS–0169] 2. § 312.12, is amended by adding paragraph (j) to read as follows: RIN 0790–AI03 I § 312.12 * mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Privacy Act; Implementation Exemptions. * * * * (j) System identifier: CIG 23 (1) System name: Public Affairs Files. (2) Exemption: During the course of processing a General Counsel action, exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become part of the case records in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those ‘other’ systems of records are entered into the Public Affairs Files, the Office of the Inspector General hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those ‘other’ systems that are entered into this system, as claimed VerDate Aug<31>2005 12:41 Nov 02, 2006 Jkt 211001 Defense Threat Reduction Agency, DoD. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Ms. Brenda M. Carter at (703) 325–1205 or DSN 221–1205. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published on August 7, 2006, at 71 FR 44603. One public comment was received, but the comments did not impact the proposed rule. The rule is therefore adopted as published below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ SUMMARY: The Defense Threat Reduction It has been determined that Privacy Agency is exempting those records in a Act rulemaking for the Department of new system of records (HDTRA 021, Defense does not involve a Federal ‘‘Freedom of Information Act and mandate that may result in the Privacy Act Case Files’’ (August 7, 2006, expenditure by State, local and tribal 71 FR 44668)) in its inventory of governments, in the aggregate, or by the systems of records pursuant to the private sector, of $100 million or more Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as and that such rulemaking will not amended. significantly or uniquely affect small governments. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 4, 2006. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03NOR1.SGM 03NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 213 / Friday, November 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 318 Dated: October 30, 2006. C.R. Choate, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. E6–18592 Filed 11–2–06; 8:45 am] Privacy. I Accordingly, 32 CFR part 318 is amended as follows: PART 318—DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 318 continues to read as follows: Defense Logistics Agency Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES 32 CFR Part 323 Exemption rules. * * * * * (d) System identifier and name: HDTRA 021, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Request Case Files. (1) Exemption: During the processing of a Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act request exempt materials from other systems of records may in turn become part of the case record in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those ‘other’ systems of records are entered into this system, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency claims the same exemptions for the records from those ‘other’ systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary system of which they are a part. (2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6) and (k)(7). (3) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly classified information relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal VerDate Aug<31>2005 12:41 Nov 02, 2006 Jkt 211001 [Docket: DoD–2006–OS–0022] RIN 0790–AI00 2. Section 318.16 is amended by adding paragraph (d) as follows: I Defense Logistics Agency, DoD. Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is modifying its exemption rule for a system of records (S500.10, ‘‘Personnel Security Files,’’ (August 11, 2006, 71 FR 46201)) in its inventory of systems of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 4, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767–5045. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published on August 11, 2006, at 71 FR 46180. No comments were received. The rule is therefore adopted as published below. Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ Privacy Act; Implementation ACTION: thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order. It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE I § 318.16 employment, military service, contract, and security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a. 64633 It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 323 Privacy. Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is amended as follows: I PART 323—DLA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 323 continues to read as follows: I Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). 2. Appendix H to part 323 is amended by revising paragraphs a.1. through a.4. to read as follows: I E:\FR\FM\03NOR1.SGM 03NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64632-64633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

32 CFR Part 318

[Docket No. DOD-2006-OS-0169]
RIN 0790-AI03


Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Privacy Act; Implementation

AGENCY: Defense Threat Reduction Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency is exempting those records 
in a new system of records (HDTRA 021, ``Freedom of Information Act and 
Privacy Act Case Files'' (August 7, 2006, 71 FR 44668)) in its 
inventory of systems of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 4, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda M. Carter at (703) 325-1205 
or DSN 221-1205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published on August 7, 
2006, at 71 FR 44603. One public comment was received, but the comments 
did not impact the proposed rule. The rule is therefore adopted as 
published below.

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; 
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in this Executive order.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities because they are concerned only with the 
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department 
of Defense.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of 
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of 
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the 
Privacy Act of 1974.

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the 
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may 
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and 
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments.

[[Page 64633]]

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 318

    Privacy.

0
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 318 is amended as follows:

PART 318--DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 318 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).


0
2. Section 318.16 is amended by adding paragraph (d) as follows:


Sec.  318.16  Exemption rules.

* * * * *
    (d) System identifier and name: HDTRA 021, Freedom of Information 
Act and Privacy Act Request Case Files.
    (1) Exemption: During the processing of a Freedom of Information 
Act or Privacy Act request exempt materials from other systems of 
records may in turn become part of the case record in this system. To 
the extent that copies of exempt records from those `other' systems of 
records are entered into this system, the Defense Threat Reduction 
Agency claims the same exemptions for the records from those `other' 
systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original 
primary system of which they are a part.
    (2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), 
(k)(5), (k)(6) and (k)(7).
    (3) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 
U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an 
exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes underlying 
the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which 
is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions 
were claimed in order to protect properly classified information 
relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference 
during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or 
investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President 
and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential 
sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and 
security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and 
integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation 
materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential 
source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the 
specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 
5 U.S.C. 552a.

    Dated: October 30, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
 [FR Doc. E6-18592 Filed 11-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.