Safety Zone; Sanibel Island Bridge Span A, Ft. Myers Beach, FL, 64116-64118 [E6-18392]
Download as PDF
64116
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
33 CFR Part 165
publication in the Federal Register. The
Coast Guard will issue a broadcast
notice to mariners and local law
enforcement vessels will be in the
vicinity of this zone to advise mariners
of the restriction.
[COTP St. Petersburg 06–219]
Background and Purpose
RIN 1625–AA00
Boh Brothers Construction will be
performing construction work on the
Sanibel Island Bridge between October
2006 and March 2007. This work will
involve setting girders, setting the deck,
setting overhangs, placing resteel,
pouring the bridge deck, and wrecking
the old bridge’s deck on the Sanibel
Island Bridge span ‘‘A’’. These
operations will require placing a barge
in the navigational channel. The nature
of this work and the close proximity of
the channel present a hazard to
mariners transiting the area. This safety
zone is being established to ensure the
safety of life on the navigable waters of
the United States.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a new temporary § 165.T07–
195 to read as follows:
I
Safety Zone; Sanibel Island Bridge
Span A, Ft. Myers Beach, FL
ACTION:
§ 165.T07–195 Safety Zone;
Caloosahatchee River, Florida.
(a) Location. The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of the Caloosahatchee River,
Florida, in the vicinity of the Cape Coral
Bridge, that includes all the waters from
surface to bottom, within a 5 foot radius
of the construction barge and
accompanying tug that are working on
the bridge fender system.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP)
St. Petersburg, Florida, in the
enforcement of regulated navigation
areas and safety and security zones.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, no person or vessel may
anchor, moor or transit the safety zone
without the prior permission of the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg,
Florida, or his designated
representative.
(d) Date. This rule is effective from 6
a.m. on September 18, 2006 through 6
p.m. on December 22, 2006 and will be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. every
Monday through Friday during the
effective period.
Dated: September 15, 2006.
J.A. Servidio,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg, Florida.
[FR Doc. E6–18333 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am]
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:00 Oct 31, 2006
Jkt 211001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of San Carlos Bay, Florida in
the vicinity of the Sanibel Island Bridge
span ‘‘A’’ while bridge construction is
conducted. This rule is necessary to
ensure the safety of the construction
workers and mariners on the navigable
waters of the United States.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on October 16, 2006 through 9 p.m. on
March 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [COTP 06–219]
and are available for inspection or
copying at Coast Guard Sector St.
Petersburg, Prevention Department, 155
Columbia Drive, Tampa Florida 33606–
3598 between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg (813)
228–2191, Ext 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The bridge
contractor did not provide the
information about the bridge
construction with sufficient time to
publish an NPRM. The Coast Guard did
not receive the scope of work for the
remaining construction until September
28, 2006 at a meeting held with the
contractors. Publishing an NPRM would
have been contrary to the public interest
since immediate action is needed to
minimize potential danger to the
construction workers and mariners
transiting the area. The Coast Guard will
issue a broadcast notice to mariners to
advise mariners of the restriction.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses the
following waters of San Carlos Bay,
Florida: All waters from surface to
bottom, within a 400 foot radius of the
following coordinates: 26°28′59″ N,
082°00′52″ W. Vessels are prohibited
from anchoring, mooring, or transiting
within this zone, unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Sector St.
Petersburg or his designated
representative.
This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on
October 16, 2006 through 9 p.m. on
March 31, 2007. However, the safety
zone will only be enforced from 6 a.m.
until 9 p.m. daily on certain dates
during that time while construction
operations are occurring. The Coast
Guard does not know the exact dates of
the construction operations at this time,
but Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg
will give notice of the enforcement of
the safety zone by issuing Broadcast
Notice to Mariners 24 to 48 hours prior
to the start of enforcement. On-Scene
notice will be provided by Coast Guard
or other local law enforcement maritime
units enforcing the safety zone as
designated representatives of Captain of
the Port Sector St. Petersburg.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This rule will only be enforced when
vessel traffic is expected to be minimal,
and traffic will be allowed to enter the
zone with the permission of the Captain
of the Port Sector St. Petersburg or
designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit near the
Sanibel Island Bridge span ‘‘A’’ from 6
a.m. on October 16, 2006 through 9 p.m.
on March 31, 2007. This safety zone will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule will
only be enforced when vessel traffic is
expected to be minimal, and traffic will
be allowed to enter the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port
Sector St. Petersburg or designated
representative.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small entities may contact the office
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT for assistance in understanding
and participating in this rulemaking.
Small businesses may also send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:00 Oct 31, 2006
Jkt 211001
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64117
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. A final
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
64118
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Broadcast Notice to Mariners 24 to 48
hours prior to the start of enforcement.
Additionally, on-scene notice will be
provided by Coast Guard or other local
law enforcement maritime units
enforcing the safety zone.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165–REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Dated: October 16, 2006.
J.A. Servidio,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector St. Petersburg, Florida.
[FR Doc. E6–18392 Filed 10–31–06; 8:45 am]
I
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
POSTAL SERVICE
2. Add temporary § 165.T07–219 to
read as follows:
I
Postal Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
(a) Location. The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of San Carlos Bay, Florida, in
the vicinity of the Sanibel Island Bridge
span ‘‘A’’. This safety zone includes all
waters from surface to bottom, within a
400 foot radius extending from the
center portion of span ‘‘A’’ at the
following coordinates: 26°28′59″ N,
082°00′52″ W. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Sector
St. Petersburg, Florida, in the
enforcement of regulated navigation
areas and safety and security zones.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, no person or vessel may
anchor, moor or transit the Regulated
Area without the prior permission of the
Captain of the Port Sector St. Petersburg,
Florida, or his designated
representative.
(d) Dates. This rule is effective from
6 a.m. on October 16, 2006 through 9
p.m. on March 31, 2007.
(e) Enforcement period. This
regulated area will only be enforced
during specific periods between the
dates specified in paragraph (d), while
construction operations are taking place.
The Coast Guard does not know the
exact dates of the construction
operations at this time, however Sector
St. Petersburg will announce each
enforcement period by issuing
19:00 Oct 31, 2006
Jkt 211001
New Standards for Mailing Sharps and
Other Regulated Medical Waste
Containers
AGENCY:
§ 165.T07—219 Safety Zone; Ft. Myers
Beach, Florida.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
39 CFR Part 111
SUMMARY: The Postal Service revises the
standards for mailing sharps and other
regulated medical waste containers. The
new standards include improvements to
the packaging, the package testing, and
the process for authorizing and
suspending authorization.
DATES: Effective Date: November 9,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bert
Olsen, 202–268–7276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (71 FR 19840, April 18,
2006) to revise the standards for mailing
sharps and other regulated medical
waste containers. Our proposal included
the following changes:
1. To require container vendors to
provide the Postal Service with the
names and addresses of their
distributors and to provide updates on
a quarterly basis.
2. To revise the process for
authorizing and suspending
authorization for mailing sharps and
other regulated medical waste
containers to enhance monitoring and
control of medical waste in the mail.
3. To revise container standards and
container testing standards to ensure
that container testing is performed on a
consistent basis for all sharps and other
regulated medical waste containers.
Comments Received
We received comments from four
authorized sharps container vendors
and one potential vendor. All
commenters supported the concept of
revising the rules to promote uniform
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
testing methods and to ensure the
integrity of mailpieces containing
sharps and other medical waste.
Documentation Requirements
Three commenters objected to the
requirement that vendors provide a list
of distributors to the Postal Service. All
three commenters argued that requiring
vendors to provide a quarterly list of
distributors could lead to disclosure of
sensitive proprietary vendor
information. We agree that the Postal
Service can identify a vendor’s
distributors, if needed, by requiring
vendors to provide this information on
request. Therefore, the final rule
requires vendors to provide the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of
their distributors to the Postal Service
only on request.
Packaging
One commenter objected to a
minimum size limit for the biohazard
symbol placed on the outer shipping
container. The commenter stated that
requiring a 3 inch by 4 inch symbol
would be excessively large on a small
mailpiece. The Postal Service notes that
currently no approved medical waste
mailpieces are so small as to not easily
accommodate a 3 inch by 4 inch
biohazard symbol. The new standard
will clarify that the 3 inch by 4 inch
label requirement applies to the outer
shipping container. For safety reasons,
medical waste containers must be easily
identified as containing biohazardous
materials. Therefore, this final rule
adopts the standard as published in the
proposal.
Three commenters did not want the
Postal Service to eliminate the use of
outer shipping containers with
interlocking bottoms. All three
commenters stated that current
requirements that allow for the use of
shipping containers with interlocking
bottom flaps reinforced with tape are
more than adequate, especially
considering the overall rigorous testing
mandates. After further consultation
with package testing professionals, we
conclude that interlocking bottom flaps
sufficiently contain the primary
receptacle, particularly when reinforced
with tape. Therefore, we will maintain
our current standards that allow
interlocking bottoms when they are
reinforced with water-resistant tape.
Two commenters requested
clarification of the proposed changes to
the secondary container requirements.
The commenters stated that increasing
the plastic bag thickness requirement
from 3 mil to 4 mil was not necessary.
In addition, they stated that it was not
advantageous to require the plastic bag
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 1, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64116-64118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP St. Petersburg 06-219]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Sanibel Island Bridge Span A, Ft. Myers Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of San Carlos Bay, Florida in the vicinity of the Sanibel Island
Bridge span ``A'' while bridge construction is conducted. This rule is
necessary to ensure the safety of the construction workers and mariners
on the navigable waters of the United States.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on October 16, 2006 through 9
p.m. on March 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [COTP 06-219] and are available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg, Prevention
Department, 155 Columbia Drive, Tampa Florida 33606-3598 between 7:30
a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Waterways Management Division at Coast
Guard Sector St. Petersburg (813) 228-2191, Ext 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The bridge contractor did not
provide the information about the bridge construction with sufficient
time to publish an NPRM. The Coast Guard did not receive the scope of
work for the remaining construction until September 28, 2006 at a
meeting held with the contractors. Publishing an NPRM would have been
contrary to the public interest since immediate action is needed to
minimize potential danger to the construction workers and mariners
transiting the area. The Coast Guard will issue a broadcast notice to
mariners to advise mariners of the restriction.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
also finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard
will issue a broadcast notice to mariners and local law enforcement
vessels will be in the vicinity of this zone to advise mariners of the
restriction.
Background and Purpose
Boh Brothers Construction will be performing construction work on
the Sanibel Island Bridge between October 2006 and March 2007. This
work will involve setting girders, setting the deck, setting overhangs,
placing resteel, pouring the bridge deck, and wrecking the old bridge's
deck on the Sanibel Island Bridge span ``A''. These operations will
require placing a barge in the navigational channel. The nature of this
work and the close proximity of the channel present a hazard to
mariners transiting the area. This safety zone is being established to
ensure the safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses the following waters of San Carlos Bay,
Florida: All waters from surface to bottom, within a 400 foot radius of
the following coordinates: 26[deg]28'59'' N, 082[deg]00'52'' W. Vessels
are prohibited from anchoring, mooring, or transiting within this zone,
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector St. Petersburg or
his designated representative.
This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on October 16, 2006 through 9
p.m. on March 31, 2007. However, the safety zone will only be enforced
from 6 a.m. until 9 p.m. daily on certain dates during that time while
construction operations are occurring. The Coast Guard does not know
the exact dates of the construction operations at this time, but Coast
Guard Sector St. Petersburg will give notice of the enforcement of the
safety zone by issuing Broadcast Notice to Mariners 24 to 48 hours
prior to the start of enforcement. On-Scene notice will be provided by
Coast Guard or other local law enforcement maritime units enforcing the
safety zone as designated representatives of Captain of the Port Sector
St. Petersburg.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
[[Page 64117]]
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This rule will only be
enforced when vessel traffic is expected to be minimal, and traffic
will be allowed to enter the zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port Sector St. Petersburg or designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit near the Sanibel Island Bridge span ``A'' from 6 a.m. on
October 16, 2006 through 9 p.m. on March 31, 2007. This safety zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities for the following reasons. This rule will only be
enforced when vessel traffic is expected to be minimal, and traffic
will be allowed to enter the zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port Sector St. Petersburg or designated representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
entities may contact the office listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT for assistance in understanding and participating in this
rulemaking. Small businesses may also send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with,
Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
[[Page 64118]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165-REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T07-219 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07--219 Safety Zone; Ft. Myers Beach, Florida.
(a) Location. The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety
zone on the waters of San Carlos Bay, Florida, in the vicinity of the
Sanibel Island Bridge span ``A''. This safety zone includes all waters
from surface to bottom, within a 400 foot radius extending from the
center portion of span ``A'' at the following coordinates:
26[deg]28'59'' N, 082[deg]00'52'' W. All coordinates referenced use
datum: NAD 83.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, and local officers
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector St.
Petersburg, Florida, in the enforcement of regulated navigation areas
and safety and security zones.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may anchor, moor or
transit the Regulated Area without the prior permission of the Captain
of the Port Sector St. Petersburg, Florida, or his designated
representative.
(d) Dates. This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on October 16, 2006
through 9 p.m. on March 31, 2007.
(e) Enforcement period. This regulated area will only be enforced
during specific periods between the dates specified in paragraph (d),
while construction operations are taking place. The Coast Guard does
not know the exact dates of the construction operations at this time,
however Sector St. Petersburg will announce each enforcement period by
issuing Broadcast Notice to Mariners 24 to 48 hours prior to the start
of enforcement. Additionally, on-scene notice will be provided by Coast
Guard or other local law enforcement maritime units enforcing the
safety zone.
Dated: October 16, 2006.
J.A. Servidio,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector St. Petersburg,
Florida.
[FR Doc. E6-18392 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P