Intensive Summer Language Institutes, 63821-63828 [E6-18280]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
otherwise prevent the U.S. Executive
Directors of the EBRD from voting in
favor of this project.
This Determination shall be reported
to the Congress and published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Daniel Fried,
Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–18303 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5598]
Determination on U.S. Position on
Proposed European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development
(EBRD) Project for Serbia
Pursuant to section 561 of the Foreign
Operations, Export Financing, and
Related Programs Appropriations Act,
2006 (Pub. L. 109–102) (FOAA), and
Department of State Delegation of
Authority Number 289, I hereby
determine that the proposed project, a
long-term 10 million euro EBRD loan to
ˇ
Stark, a.d., a leading Serbian
confectionary company, to finance the
company’s modernization with the
future goal of expanding its scope of
operations in the region, will contribute
to a stronger and more integrated
economy in the Balkans and thus
directly support implementation of the
Dayton Accords. I therefore waive the
application of Section 561 of the FOAA
to the extent that provision would
otherwise prevent the U.S. Executive
Directors of the EBRD from voting in
favor of this project.
This Determination shall be reported
to the Congress and published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
Daniel Fried,
Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–18305 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5597]
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Intensive Summer Language Institutes
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E–07–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
Application Deadline: January 5,
2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs announces an open competition
for projects to provide foreign language
instruction overseas for American
undergraduate and graduate students in
the summer of 2007 in support of the
National Security Language Initiative
(NSLI). Public and private non-profit
organizations, or consortia of such
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), may submit
proposals to implement six-to ten-week
summer institutes overseas for a
minimum total of 365 participants in
countries where Arabic, Chinese,
Korean, Russian and the Indic, Persian,
and Turkic language families are widely
spoken. These summer institutes should
offer U.S. undergraduate and graduate
students structured classroom
instruction and less formal interactive
learning opportunities through a
comprehensive exchange experience
that primarily emphasizes language
learning. Proposals from applicant
organizations should clearly indicate
the building of new, additional
institutional language-teaching capacity
overseas for these summer institutes—
this program is designed to develop
additional language study opportunities
for U.S. students.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority
for this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of
1961, as amended, Public Law 87–256, also
known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The
purpose of the Act is ‘‘to enable the
Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of other
countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which
unite us with other nations by demonstrating
the educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other nations
* * * and thus to assist in the development
of friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful
relations between the United States and the
other countries of the world.’’ The funding
authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA) is supporting
the participation of American
undergraduate and graduate students in
intensive, substantive foreign language
study to further strengthen national
security and prosperity in the 21st
century as part of the National Security
Language Initiative (NSLI), launched by
President Bush in January 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63821
Foreign language skills are essential to
engaging foreign governments and
peoples, especially in critical world
regions, to promote understanding and
convey respect for other cultures. These
skills are essential to Americans who
will support the nation’s foreign affairs
priorities, its economic competitiveness,
and its educational institutions as they
prepare future citizens for full
engagement in the global environment.
The broad NSLI initiative focuses
resources on improving language
learning for U.S. citizens across the
educational spectrum and emphasizes
the need to achieve mastery of critical
languages; this activity focuses on the
college and university section.
The goals of the Intensive Summer
Language Institutes are:
• To develop a cadre of Americans
with advanced linguistic skills and
related cultural understanding who are
able to advance international dialogue,
promote the security of the United
States, compete effectively in the global
economy, and better serve the needs of
students and academic institutions; and
• To improve the ability of Americans
to engage with the people of other
countries through the shared language
of the partner country.
In order to achieve these goals, the
Bureau supports programs for American
undergraduate and graduate students to
gain and improve language proficiency
in Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Russian and
the Indic, Persian, and Turkic language
families. ECA plans to award a single
grant for the recruitment and
administration of all Intensive Summer
Language Institutes in all world regions.
Organizations with expertise in one or
more of the indicated languages are
encouraged to seek partners in the other
languages to submit a single proposal.
Consortia must designate a lead
institution to receive the grant award.
Applicant organizations may submit
grant proposals requesting funds not
exceeding $6,000,000 to implement
these overseas language institutes
between June and August 2007.
Through these institutes,
undergraduate and graduate students
from the United States will spend six to
ten weeks on a program abroad in the
summer of 2007. Since there is an
emphasis on substantial progress in
foreign language advancement,
applicant organizations need to
concentrate most efforts on language
programs and explain clearly the utility
and advantages of proposing programs
closer to six weeks. The institutes will
provide intensive language instruction
in a classroom setting, and should also
provide language-learning opportunities
through immersion in the cultural,
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
63822
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
social, and educational life of the
partner country. The exchange program
should enhance the participants’
knowledge of the host country’s history,
culture, and political system as these
support language learning. Language
study must be the primary focus of the
program.
Expected Program Results
• Participants will demonstrate a
substantive, measurable increase in
language proficiency (verified through
testing).
• Alumni will continue their foreign
language study, apply their linguistic
skills in their chosen career fields, and/
or participate in other exchanges to the
participating countries.
• Participants will demonstrate a
deeper understanding of the host
country’s society, institutions, and
culture.
Capacity of Administering
Organization: U.S. applicant
organizations or consortia must have the
necessary capacity in the partner
country or countries to implement the
program through either their own offices
or partner institutions. Organizations
may demonstrate their organization’s
direct expertise, or they may partner
with other organizations to best respond
to the requirements outlined in the
RFGP. Organizations that opt to work in
sub-grant arrangements should clearly
outline all duties and responsibilities of
the partner organization, ideally in the
form of sub-grant agreements and
accompanying budgets.
Organizations or consortia applying
for this grant must demonstrate their (or
their partners’) capacity for conducting
projects of this nature, focusing on three
areas of competency: (1) Provision of
related foreign language instruction
programs and provision of educational
and cultural exchange activities as
outlined in this document; (2) language
level-appropriate programming for the
target audience; and (3) experience in
conducting programs in the proposed
partner country or countries. Applicant
organizations must present a proposal
that clearly indicates the building of
new and increased institutional
language study capacity overseas for
these summer institutes.
Institute Information: Each six- to tenweek overseas summer institute for
undergraduate and graduate students
should focus on language study and
should include 4 to 6 hours per day of
formal and informal language training.
The cooperating agency should provide
multiple levels of language instruction.
While teaching conversational
vocabulary will be necessary to help
students cope with their immersion
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
setting, classes should also provide
formal instruction in grammar,
vocabulary, and pronunciation, and will
cover speaking, listening, reading, and
writing, including new alphabets.
The institutes should also include a
secondary cultural immersion
component designed to reinforce
language learning with planned
excursions, which give the students the
opportunity to participate in activities
designed to teach them about
community life and the culture and
history of the host country. The program
activities will introduce the students to
the community as feasible and
appropriate and will include
educational excursions that serve to
enhance the visitors’ understanding of
contemporary society, culture, media,
political institutions, ethnic diversity,
history, and environment of the region.
Staff should be physically present and
available to support the participants
during the course of the institute.
The Bureau reserves the right to make
changes in eligible countries for
programming based on safety and
security concerns.
Country and Language Information:
For Arabic language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 150 participants
in the Arabic language institutes. Arabic
language instruction should be available
for three levels of students: elementary,
intermediate, and advanced.
Approximately 100 of the participants
should receive instruction at the
intermediate/advanced levels while the
rest should receive elementary level
instruction. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation
for learners of varying skill levels.
Classroom instruction should
emphasize Modern Standard Arabic
with class time devoted also to
colloquial Arabic, as appropriate.
Students should also gain knowledge of
colloquial Arabic through informal
study and through interaction with their
host community.
Some previous study of the
language—at least equivalent to a
university semester—is required for
participants in the elementary Arabic
institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Arabic institutes
will have already studied the language
formally for at least 2 years by the start
of the summer program. The institute
should devise a plan to test all students
prior to placement to determine the
appropriate level of instruction.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to a country in North
Africa, the Middle East, or the Gulf
region, with the exception of Algeria,
Iraq, Israel, Libya, Lebanon, Saudi
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Arabia, and West Bank/Gaza. Applicant
organizations must include venues in
Egypt, Jordan, and Morocco.
For Chinese language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 40 participants in
the Chinese language institutes. Chinese
language instruction should be available
for two levels of students: intermediate
and advanced. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation
for learners of varying skill levels.
Students should study Mandarin in
class and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
Teaching materials used in the program
should be available in both simplified
and traditional character versions. The
Hanyu pinyin romanization system
should be used.
Participants in the intermediate/
advanced Chinese institutes will have
already studied the language formally
for at least 2 years by the start of the
summer program. The institute should
devise a plan to test all students prior
to placement to determine what level of
instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to the People’s
Republic of China (mainland China) for
study.
For Indic language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 72 participants in
the Indic language institutes. For these
language institutes, not less than 18
students must learn Bengali/Bangla, not
less than 18 must learn Hindi, not less
than 18 must learn Punjabi, and not less
than 18 must learn Urdu. Instruction
should be available for each of these
Indic languages. All Indic language
instruction should be available for three
levels of students: elementary,
intermediate, and advanced. Overall, 40
of the participants should receive
instruction at the intermediate/
advanced level while the rest should
receive elementary level instruction.
The proposed institute should make
explicit accommodation for learners of
varying skill levels.
Students should learn Indic languages
in class and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
Some previous study of the
language—at least equivalent to a
university semester—is required for
participants in the elementary Indic
institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Indic institutes
will have already studied the relevant
language formally for at least 2 years by
the start of the summer program. The
institute should devise a plan to test all
students prior to placement to
determine what level of instruction
should be received.
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to Bangladesh and/or
India. The Bureau will consider
proposals for Pakistan, but reserves the
right to alter eligible countries based on
safety and security concerns. Applicants
proposing Pakistan should propose an
alternate site should conditions not
permit placement of students in
Pakistan.
For Korean language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 25 participants in
the Korean language institutes. Korean
language instruction should be available
for three levels of students: elementary,
intermediate, and advanced. Ten of the
participants should receive instruction
at the intermediate/advanced level
while the rest should receive elementary
level instruction. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation
for learners of varying skill levels.
Students should learn Korean in class
and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
The Hangeul alphabet system should be
used. Students should also be
introduced to NAKL.
Some previous study of the
language—at least equivalent to a
university semester—is required for
participants in the elementary Korean
institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Korean
institutes will have already studied the
language formally for at least two years
by the start of the summer program. The
institute should devise a plan to test all
students prior to placement to
determine what level of instruction
should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to South Korea.
For Persian language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 15 participants in
the Persian language institutes. Farsi
language instruction should be available
for three levels of students: beginning or
introductory, intermediate, and
advanced. Seven of the participants
should receive instruction at the
intermediate/advanced level while the
rest should receive beginning or
introductory level instruction. The
proposed institute should make explicit
accommodation for learners of varying
skill levels.
Students should learn Farsi in class
and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
No prior study of the language is
required for participants in the
beginning or introductory Farsi
institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Farsi institutes
will have already studied the language
formally for at least two years by the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
start of the summer program. The
institute should devise a plan to test all
students prior to placement to
determine what level of instruction
should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to Tajikistan for study
of Farsi.
For Russian language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 30 participants in
the Russian language institutes. Russian
language instruction should be available
for two levels of students: intermediate
and advanced. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation
for learners of varying skill levels.
Students should learn Russian in
class and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
Participants in the intermediate/
advanced Russian institutes will have
already studied the language formally
for at least two years by the start of the
summer program. The institute should
devise a plan to test all students prior
to placement to determine what level of
instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to Russia. Location of
the institute(s) should be outside of
Moscow and St. Petersburg in order to
maximize language-learning
opportunities.
For Turkic language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present
plans for not less than 35 participants in
the Turkic language institutes. Turkish
language instruction should be available
for three levels of students: beginning or
introductory, intermediate, and
advanced. Fifteen of the participants
should receive instruction at the
intermediate/advanced level while the
rest should receive beginning or
introductory level instruction. The
proposed institute should make explicit
accommodation for learners of varying
skill levels.
Students should learn Turkish in
class and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
No prior study of the language is
required for participants in the
beginning or introductory Turkish
institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Turkish
institutes will have already studied the
language formally for at least two years
by the start of the summer program. The
institute should devise a plan to test
intermediate/advanced students prior to
placement to determine what level of
instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to Turkey. Location of
the institute(s) should be outside of
Istanbul in order to maximize languagelearning opportunities.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63823
Participant Recruitment and
Selection: The cooperating agency will
recruit, screen, and select U.S. citizen
undergraduate and graduate students for
the program. Selected participants
should show strong evidence of ability
to succeed in an intensive, demanding
language study program and should
represent the diversity of the United
States. Diversity addresses differences of
religion, ethnicity, socio-economic
status, and physical abilities. Selected
students should also represent diversity
of geography, institutional type, and
fields of study, a balance between
genders, and a balance between
undergraduate and graduate students.
Preference should be given to
candidates with no previous study
overseas. Students should have
completed at least their first year of
undergraduate study by the summer of
2007. Selected students should
demonstrate an intention of continuing
their language study beyond the
scholarship period and applying their
critical language skills later in their
professional careers. The students’
language skills at the start of the
institute should meet the requirements
for each language outlined above.
The Bureau should be consulted
regarding the selection of candidates
and will approve the selection of
finalists and alternates for the program.
Information about the program, along
with all accompanying application
materials, should be posted online.
Applicant organizations should propose
a comprehensive outreach plan under
Tab E to publicize and recruit for the
program at U.S. colleges and
universities nationwide.
The Bureau requests that student
applicants apply to the program through
an online application system. An
alternate paper-based application
should also be provided for those
candidates unable to apply online.
These paper-based applications,
however, must be entered into the
online system by grantee organization
program staff. All application materials
should be available in a sortable,
searchable, electronically accessible
database format that can be easily
shared with the Bureau upon request.
Orientations: The grantee organization
will organize a substantive, in-person,
pre-departure orientation for all
students. Working in consultation with
ECA, the orientation should include a
security briefing on the host country.
The grantee organization may also need
to work in consultation with ECA and
the U.S. Embassy in the host country to
arrange an in-country security briefing
to be held by the Embassy’s Regional
Security Officer. The orientations
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
63824
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
should take place in Washington, DC.
The applicant organization should
provide a compelling justification if
they propose to host these orientations
in any other location. Comprehensive
information packets should be provided
to all orientation participants. A sample
of the contents of these packets should
be provided under Tab E.
At the end of the language study
exchange, the cooperating agency will
organize an in-country closing
workshop for the students prior to
departure from their host country,
which will focus on summarizing the
experience, completing an evaluation,
language testing, developing plans for
activities at home, and preparing for reentry.
Project Activities: Describe in
sufficient detail the major components
of the program, including project
planning; publicity and recruitment,
including responding to and
management of a significant volume of
queries and applications; the host
venues; selection; orientations (U.S. and
overseas); assessment and testing;
language instruction; educational
enrichment activities; cultural activities;
participant monitoring; and logistics.
Assessment and Testing:
Standardized pre- and post-institute
testing should be done to determine
participants’ language proficiency and
progress.
Pre- and post-testing should measure
the student’s advancement in language
learning. The Bureau will work with the
cooperating agency to develop and
implement an instrument to measure
students’ increased language proficiency
due to participation in this program.
The data need to be analyzed and
reported by the cooperating agency to
ECA for the program, disaggregated by
institute.
Alumni Tracking and Follow-On
Activities: Alumni activities are an
important part of ECA’s academic
exchange programs. Alumni
programming in the form of newsletters
and listservs provides critical program
follow-on and maximizes and extends
the benefit of the participants’ program.
The cooperating agency is strongly
urged to outline how it will creatively
organize and financially support alumni
activities at a minimal cost to ECA.
Publicity: The proposal must describe
how these intensive summer language
institutes will be publicized to media
outlets, including print, online, and
broadcast to reach the widest possible
audience of qualified students. The
cooperating agency will also work
closely with ECA to publicize the
successes of the students involved in
these institutes, as well as the National
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
Security Language Initiative as a whole.
The applicant organization should
provide information on successful
media outreach campaigns it has
conducted in the past under Tab E.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/A/E
is substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine
grant monitoring. ECA/A/E activities
and responsibilities for this program are
as follows:
(1) Review all print and online
materials (including, but not limited to,
those for recruitment and orientation)
regarding the institutes before
publication and dissemination. Review
does not include instructional materials,
though the Bureau does reserve the right
to request these materials as needed.
(2) Work with the cooperating agency
on a recruitment strategy.
(3) Work with the cooperating agency
to publicize the program, and the
National Security Language Initiative
(NSLI) as a whole, through various
media outlets.
(4) Review and approve application
forms.
(5) Participate in selection
committees.
(6) Confirm final selection of
principal and alternate candidates.
(7) Work with cooperating agency to
implement participant orientations.
(8) Work with cooperating agency to
offer standardized pre- and postinstitute testing of participants’
language proficiency and progress.
(9) Review project activity schedules
for all institutes.
(10) Be kept informed by the
cooperating agency of its progress at
each stage of the project’s
implementation through timely updates.
(11) Provide Bureau-approved
evaluation surveys for completion by
participants after completion of
program.
(12) Provide substantive input on
alumni activities and follow-up events.
Note: All materials, publicity, and
correspondence related to the program must
acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the
U.S. Department of State. The Bureau will
retain copyright use of and distribute
materials related to this program as it sees fit.
Funding: Grant funding will support
costs including recruitment and
selection of participants, testing,
orientation, travel, tuition and
maintenance costs, educational
enhancements, cultural and social
activities, alumni activities, and
administrative costs.
Programs must comply with J–1 visa
regulations. Please refer to the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document and the Proposal
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submission Instructions for further
information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$6,000,000, pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Ceiling of Award Range: $6,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, the proposed start
date is February 15, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
Approximately 14 to 18 months after the
start date, depending on the proposed
program plan.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, ECA reserves
the right to renew the grant for two
additional fiscal years.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs that are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding a single grant not exceeding
$6,000,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau urges applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package:
Please contact the Office of Academic
Exchange Programs (ECA/A/E), Room
234, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, Telephone (202) 453–8135, Fax
(202) 453–8125, E-mail:
ManleyHL@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/A/
E–07–01) located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria, and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Special Projects
Officer Heidi Manley and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number located at
the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 form that
is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63825
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Ideally programs use logic
models, a system that is designed to link
a program’s overall goals and objectives
to inputs, outputs and outcomes. Inputs
are resources, such as time money,
materials, supplies and personnel,
which are consumed to produce outputs
and outcomes. Outputs are the
immediate products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount.
Output information is important to
show the scope or size of project
activities, but it cannot substitute for
information about progress towards
outcomes or the results achieved.
Examples of outputs include the
number of people trained or the number
of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in
contrast, represent specific results a
project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of
change. Expected program outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP, include:
(1) Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
(2) Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
(3) Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in school or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between participants
and host families, and others.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear program
objectives, outcomes, and outputs at the
outset of a program. A draft monitoring
and evaluation plan should include the
following components:
(1) A description of the program’s
goals and objectives and anticipated
outputs and outcomes.
(2) A description of how the
cooperating agency and host institutions
intend to monitor and report program
activities at the output level. This may
include the use of participant surveys
that focus on logistics and
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
63826
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
administration, focus groups and
interviews.
(3) Incorporation of pre- and posttesting for language acquisition to
measure one of the program’s outcomes.
The Bureau will work with the
cooperating agency to develop and
implement an instrument to measure
students’ increased language proficiency
due to participation in this program.
The data need to be analyzed and
reported by the cooperating agency to
ECA for the program, disaggregated by
institute.
(4) Incorporation of three surveys
using ECA’s E–GOALS to measure
additional program outcomes.
Administered by the Bureau’s Office of
Policy and Evaluation (ECA/P), E–
GOALS is an online system for
surveying program participants and
collecting data about program
performance. All program participants
will be required to take three online
surveys:
(a) Standardized pre-program surveys,
at the beginning of the program;
(b) Standardized post-program
surveys, at the end of the program; and
(c) Standardized follow-up surveys,
approximately six months after the
conclusion of the program.
These surveys are designed to help
the cooperating agency and ECA assess:
student satisfaction with the program;
student attitudes and views; the extent
of learning and skill development
(including leadership); reliance on new
learning and skills in their studies, at
work, and in their communities; and
their efforts to share new ideas,
knowledge, and insights. Included in
these surveys are questions specific to
ECA’s internal reporting.
The cooperating agency will be
expected to work with the Program
Officer and an evaluator from the Office
of Policy and Evaluation to refine and
implement the survey instruments. To
ensure proper implementation of E–
GOALS, the cooperating agency will be
required to:
• Provide the Program Officer and E–
GOALS evaluator with all contact
information and bio-data of program
participants.
• Provide all participants with
information about the E–GOALS survey.
Students must be advised that they are
required to take all three surveys,
assuring them that the surveys are
completely confidential, anonymous,
and used only for evaluative purposes.
• Notify students of the E–GOALS
survey link, information about E–
GOALS and survey instructions.
• Allocate time for E–GOALS
surveying prior to the students
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
departure from their return to the U.S.
and at the end of the program.
• Send reminder notices to students
to take the follow-up survey.
(5) A description of any additional
methods planned to supplement
information obtained through language
proficiency surveys and E–GOALS to
measure progress towards achievement
of the program’s objectives, such as the
use of focus groups and interviews, and
how the data will be analyzed and
reported.
Overall, the quality of the applicant
organization’s monitoring and
evaluation plan will be judged on how
well it (1) specifies intended goals and
objectives; (2) gives clear descriptions of
how each outcome and output will be
measured; (3) identifies when particular
outcomes and outputs will be measured;
and (4) incorporates and describes data
collection strategies for each outcome
(i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus
groups).
The cooperating agency will be
required to provide reports analyzing
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
regular program reports. All data
collected, including survey responses
and contact information, must be
maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4. Describe in your proposal
your plans for: overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and with overseas institutes
enrolling clusters of students,
recruitment, testing, orientation, and
cultural enrichment opportunities for
students. Please provide a staffing plan
that outlines the responsibilities of each
staff person and explains which staff
members will be accountable for each
program responsibility.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Grant requests should not
exceed $6,000,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants should
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
Applicants should also provide copies
of any sub-grant agreements that would
be implemented under terms of this
award.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program and additional budget guidance
are outlined in detail in the POGI
document.
Please refer to the POGI and the PSI
documents in the Solicitation Package
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3F. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: January 5,
2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E–07–01.
Methods of Submission
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy,
and eight copies of the application with
Tabs A–E (for a total of ten copies)
should be sent to: U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/E–07–01,
Program Management, ECA/EX/PM,
Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to the appropriate Public
Affairs Section(s) at the U.S.
embassy(ies) for its(their) review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ’Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support;
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the Grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (cooperative agreements) resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria: Please see proposal
review criteria in the accompanying
Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A 122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’ Office of
Management and Budget Circular A–21,
‘‘Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions.’’ OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost
Principles for State, Local and Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63827
Governments’’. OMB Circular No. A 110
(Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other
Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
2. Interim program and financial
reports that include information on the
progress made on the program plan and
program results to date.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
1. Name, address, contact information
and biographic sketch of all persons
who travel internationally on funds
provided by the grant or who benefit
from the grant funding but do not travel.
2. Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
63828
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Notices
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Heidi Manley,
Office of Academic Exchange Programs,
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, ECA/A/E–07–01, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Room 234, Washington, DC
20547, Telephone (202) 453–8135, Fax
(202) 453–8125, E-mail
ManleyHL@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E–
07–01.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: October 25, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–18280 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5588]
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Announcement of Meetings of the
International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee
SUMMARY: This notice announces several
meetings of the International
Telecommunication Advisory
Committee (ITAC).
The International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet to
prepare advice on proposed U.S.
contributions to the Permanent
Executive Committee of the
Organization of American States InterAmerican Telecommunication
Commission (COM/CITEL) on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Oct 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
Wednesday November 29, 2006 2–4
p.m. eastern time in the Washington DC
metro area.
The International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet to
prepare advice on proposed U.S.
contributions to Study Group 17
(Security, languages and
telecommunication software) of the
International Telecommunication
Union’s Telecommunication
Standardization Sector on Tuesday
November 14, 2006 from 10–noon
eastern time by conference call.
The International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet to
prepare advice on proposed U.S.
contributions to the Committee on
Information Services and Policy (CISP)
and Working Party on the Information
Economy (WPIE) meetings of the
Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) on November
16 and 30, 2006 10:30 a.m.–noon
eastern time in room 2533A in the Harry
S Truman State Department building.
These meetings are open to the
public, and conference bridges may be
available. Further information may be
obtained from the Secretariat
minardje@state.gov, telephone 202–
647–3234.
Date: October 23, 2006.
Anne D. Jillson,
Foreign Affairs Officer, International
Communications & Information Policy,
Multilateral Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–18269 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5600]
U.S. Department of State Advisory
Committee on Private International
Law: Study Group on Consumer
Protection
The Department of State Advisory
Committee on Private International Law
will hold a study group to discuss the
various proposals on consumer
protection which have been made in
connection with the Organization of
American States’ Seventh InterAmerican Specialized Conference on
Private International Law. The meeting
will take place Thursday, November 9th
from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. at the
International Law Institute, The
Foundry Building, 1055 Thomas
Jefferson St., NW., Washington, DC.
Public Participation: Advisory
Committee Study group meetings are
open to the public. Persons wishing to
attend need to provide in advance, not
later than Monday, November 6, their
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
name, address, contact numbers,
including e-mail address if available,
and affiliation(s) to Trisha Smeltzer at
smeltzertk@state.gov. Additional
meeting information can be obtained
from Ms. Smeltzer at 202–776–8423.
Persons who cannot attend but who
wish to comment on any of the topics
referred to are welcome to do so in
writing or by e-mail to Michael Dennis
at DennisMJ@state.gov or Harold
Burman at BurmanHS@State.gov.
Dated: October 24, 2006.
David P. Stewart,
Assistant Legal Advisor, Office of Private
International Law, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–18274 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection Activity
Seeking OMB Approval
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) revision of a current information
collection. The Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on August 8,
2006, vol. 71, no. 152, page 45092. The
collection of information is necessary
for gathering data concerning potential
new hires for the FAA.
DATES: Please submit comments by
November 30, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Mauney at Carla.Mauney@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Title: Application for Employment
with the Federal Aviation
Administration.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0597.
Forms(s): There are no FAA forms
associated with this collection.
Affected Public: An estimated 81,526
Respondents.
Frequency: This information is
collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden Per
Response: Approximately 1.5 hours per
response.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 123,000 hours annually.
Abstract: The collection of
information is necessary for gathering
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63821-63828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18280]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5597]
Intensive Summer Language Institutes
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E-07-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: January 5, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition for projects to provide foreign language instruction
overseas for American undergraduate and graduate students in the summer
of 2007 in support of the National Security Language Initiative (NSLI).
Public and private non-profit organizations, or consortia of such
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), may submit proposals to implement six-to
ten-week summer institutes overseas for a minimum total of 365
participants in countries where Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Russian and
the Indic, Persian, and Turkic language families are widely spoken.
These summer institutes should offer U.S. undergraduate and graduate
students structured classroom instruction and less formal interactive
learning opportunities through a comprehensive exchange experience that
primarily emphasizes language learning. Proposals from applicant
organizations should clearly indicate the building of new, additional
institutional language-teaching capacity overseas for these summer
institutes--this program is designed to develop additional language
study opportunities for U.S. students.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of
1961, as amended, Public Law 87-256, also known as the Fulbright-
Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of
the United States to increase mutual understanding between the
people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by
demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments,
and achievements of the people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly,
sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) is
supporting the participation of American undergraduate and graduate
students in intensive, substantive foreign language study to further
strengthen national security and prosperity in the 21st century as part
of the National Security Language Initiative (NSLI), launched by
President Bush in January 2006.
Foreign language skills are essential to engaging foreign
governments and peoples, especially in critical world regions, to
promote understanding and convey respect for other cultures. These
skills are essential to Americans who will support the nation's foreign
affairs priorities, its economic competitiveness, and its educational
institutions as they prepare future citizens for full engagement in the
global environment. The broad NSLI initiative focuses resources on
improving language learning for U.S. citizens across the educational
spectrum and emphasizes the need to achieve mastery of critical
languages; this activity focuses on the college and university section.
The goals of the Intensive Summer Language Institutes are:
To develop a cadre of Americans with advanced linguistic
skills and related cultural understanding who are able to advance
international dialogue, promote the security of the United States,
compete effectively in the global economy, and better serve the needs
of students and academic institutions; and
To improve the ability of Americans to engage with the
people of other countries through the shared language of the partner
country.
In order to achieve these goals, the Bureau supports programs for
American undergraduate and graduate students to gain and improve
language proficiency in Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Russian and the Indic,
Persian, and Turkic language families. ECA plans to award a single
grant for the recruitment and administration of all Intensive Summer
Language Institutes in all world regions. Organizations with expertise
in one or more of the indicated languages are encouraged to seek
partners in the other languages to submit a single proposal. Consortia
must designate a lead institution to receive the grant award. Applicant
organizations may submit grant proposals requesting funds not exceeding
$6,000,000 to implement these overseas language institutes between June
and August 2007.
Through these institutes, undergraduate and graduate students from
the United States will spend six to ten weeks on a program abroad in
the summer of 2007. Since there is an emphasis on substantial progress
in foreign language advancement, applicant organizations need to
concentrate most efforts on language programs and explain clearly the
utility and advantages of proposing programs closer to six weeks. The
institutes will provide intensive language instruction in a classroom
setting, and should also provide language-learning opportunities
through immersion in the cultural,
[[Page 63822]]
social, and educational life of the partner country. The exchange
program should enhance the participants' knowledge of the host
country's history, culture, and political system as these support
language learning. Language study must be the primary focus of the
program.
Expected Program Results
Participants will demonstrate a substantive, measurable
increase in language proficiency (verified through testing).
Alumni will continue their foreign language study, apply
their linguistic skills in their chosen career fields, and/or
participate in other exchanges to the participating countries.
Participants will demonstrate a deeper understanding of
the host country's society, institutions, and culture.
Capacity of Administering Organization: U.S. applicant
organizations or consortia must have the necessary capacity in the
partner country or countries to implement the program through either
their own offices or partner institutions. Organizations may
demonstrate their organization's direct expertise, or they may partner
with other organizations to best respond to the requirements outlined
in the RFGP. Organizations that opt to work in sub-grant arrangements
should clearly outline all duties and responsibilities of the partner
organization, ideally in the form of sub-grant agreements and
accompanying budgets.
Organizations or consortia applying for this grant must demonstrate
their (or their partners') capacity for conducting projects of this
nature, focusing on three areas of competency: (1) Provision of related
foreign language instruction programs and provision of educational and
cultural exchange activities as outlined in this document; (2) language
level-appropriate programming for the target audience; and (3)
experience in conducting programs in the proposed partner country or
countries. Applicant organizations must present a proposal that clearly
indicates the building of new and increased institutional language
study capacity overseas for these summer institutes.
Institute Information: Each six- to ten-week overseas summer
institute for undergraduate and graduate students should focus on
language study and should include 4 to 6 hours per day of formal and
informal language training. The cooperating agency should provide
multiple levels of language instruction. While teaching conversational
vocabulary will be necessary to help students cope with their immersion
setting, classes should also provide formal instruction in grammar,
vocabulary, and pronunciation, and will cover speaking, listening,
reading, and writing, including new alphabets.
The institutes should also include a secondary cultural immersion
component designed to reinforce language learning with planned
excursions, which give the students the opportunity to participate in
activities designed to teach them about community life and the culture
and history of the host country. The program activities will introduce
the students to the community as feasible and appropriate and will
include educational excursions that serve to enhance the visitors'
understanding of contemporary society, culture, media, political
institutions, ethnic diversity, history, and environment of the region.
Staff should be physically present and available to support the
participants during the course of the institute.
The Bureau reserves the right to make changes in eligible countries
for programming based on safety and security concerns.
Country and Language Information: For Arabic language institutes:
Applicant organizations should present plans for not less than 150
participants in the Arabic language institutes. Arabic language
instruction should be available for three levels of students:
elementary, intermediate, and advanced. Approximately 100 of the
participants should receive instruction at the intermediate/advanced
levels while the rest should receive elementary level instruction. The
proposed institute should make explicit accommodation for learners of
varying skill levels.
Classroom instruction should emphasize Modern Standard Arabic with
class time devoted also to colloquial Arabic, as appropriate. Students
should also gain knowledge of colloquial Arabic through informal study
and through interaction with their host community.
Some previous study of the language--at least equivalent to a
university semester--is required for participants in the elementary
Arabic institutes. Participants in the intermediate/advanced Arabic
institutes will have already studied the language formally for at least
2 years by the start of the summer program. The institute should devise
a plan to test all students prior to placement to determine the
appropriate level of instruction.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to a country
in North Africa, the Middle East, or the Gulf region, with the
exception of Algeria, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and
West Bank/Gaza. Applicant organizations must include venues in Egypt,
Jordan, and Morocco.
For Chinese language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 40 participants in the Chinese language
institutes. Chinese language instruction should be available for two
levels of students: intermediate and advanced. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation for learners of varying skill
levels.
Students should study Mandarin in class and through informal study
and interaction with their host community. Teaching materials used in
the program should be available in both simplified and traditional
character versions. The Hanyu pinyin romanization system should be
used.
Participants in the intermediate/advanced Chinese institutes will
have already studied the language formally for at least 2 years by the
start of the summer program. The institute should devise a plan to test
all students prior to placement to determine what level of instruction
should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to the
People's Republic of China (mainland China) for study.
For Indic language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 72 participants in the Indic language
institutes. For these language institutes, not less than 18 students
must learn Bengali/Bangla, not less than 18 must learn Hindi, not less
than 18 must learn Punjabi, and not less than 18 must learn Urdu.
Instruction should be available for each of these Indic languages. All
Indic language instruction should be available for three levels of
students: elementary, intermediate, and advanced. Overall, 40 of the
participants should receive instruction at the intermediate/advanced
level while the rest should receive elementary level instruction. The
proposed institute should make explicit accommodation for learners of
varying skill levels.
Students should learn Indic languages in class and through informal
study and interaction with their host community.
Some previous study of the language--at least equivalent to a
university semester--is required for participants in the elementary
Indic institutes. Participants in the intermediate/advanced Indic
institutes will have already studied the relevant language formally for
at least 2 years by the start of the summer program. The institute
should devise a plan to test all students prior to placement to
determine what level of instruction should be received.
[[Page 63823]]
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to Bangladesh
and/or India. The Bureau will consider proposals for Pakistan, but
reserves the right to alter eligible countries based on safety and
security concerns. Applicants proposing Pakistan should propose an
alternate site should conditions not permit placement of students in
Pakistan.
For Korean language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 25 participants in the Korean language
institutes. Korean language instruction should be available for three
levels of students: elementary, intermediate, and advanced. Ten of the
participants should receive instruction at the intermediate/advanced
level while the rest should receive elementary level instruction. The
proposed institute should make explicit accommodation for learners of
varying skill levels.
Students should learn Korean in class and through informal study
and interaction with their host community. The Hangeul alphabet system
should be used. Students should also be introduced to NAKL.
Some previous study of the language--at least equivalent to a
university semester--is required for participants in the elementary
Korean institutes. Participants in the intermediate/advanced Korean
institutes will have already studied the language formally for at least
two years by the start of the summer program. The institute should
devise a plan to test all students prior to placement to determine what
level of instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to South
Korea.
For Persian language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 15 participants in the Persian language
institutes. Farsi language instruction should be available for three
levels of students: beginning or introductory, intermediate, and
advanced. Seven of the participants should receive instruction at the
intermediate/advanced level while the rest should receive beginning or
introductory level instruction. The proposed institute should make
explicit accommodation for learners of varying skill levels.
Students should learn Farsi in class and through informal study and
interaction with their host community.
No prior study of the language is required for participants in the
beginning or introductory Farsi institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Farsi institutes will have already studied the
language formally for at least two years by the start of the summer
program. The institute should devise a plan to test all students prior
to placement to determine what level of instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to Tajikistan
for study of Farsi.
For Russian language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 30 participants in the Russian language
institutes. Russian language instruction should be available for two
levels of students: intermediate and advanced. The proposed institute
should make explicit accommodation for learners of varying skill
levels.
Students should learn Russian in class and through informal study
and interaction with their host community.
Participants in the intermediate/advanced Russian institutes will
have already studied the language formally for at least two years by
the start of the summer program. The institute should devise a plan to
test all students prior to placement to determine what level of
instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to Russia.
Location of the institute(s) should be outside of Moscow and St.
Petersburg in order to maximize language-learning opportunities.
For Turkic language institutes: Applicant organizations should
present plans for not less than 35 participants in the Turkic language
institutes. Turkish language instruction should be available for three
levels of students: beginning or introductory, intermediate, and
advanced. Fifteen of the participants should receive instruction at the
intermediate/advanced level while the rest should receive beginning or
introductory level instruction. The proposed institute should make
explicit accommodation for learners of varying skill levels.
Students should learn Turkish in class and through informal study
and interaction with their host community.
No prior study of the language is required for participants in the
beginning or introductory Turkish institutes. Participants in the
intermediate/advanced Turkish institutes will have already studied the
language formally for at least two years by the start of the summer
program. The institute should devise a plan to test intermediate/
advanced students prior to placement to determine what level of
instruction should be received.
Applicant organizations should plan to send students to Turkey.
Location of the institute(s) should be outside of Istanbul in order to
maximize language-learning opportunities.
Participant Recruitment and Selection: The cooperating agency will
recruit, screen, and select U.S. citizen undergraduate and graduate
students for the program. Selected participants should show strong
evidence of ability to succeed in an intensive, demanding language
study program and should represent the diversity of the United States.
Diversity addresses differences of religion, ethnicity, socio-economic
status, and physical abilities. Selected students should also represent
diversity of geography, institutional type, and fields of study, a
balance between genders, and a balance between undergraduate and
graduate students. Preference should be given to candidates with no
previous study overseas. Students should have completed at least their
first year of undergraduate study by the summer of 2007. Selected
students should demonstrate an intention of continuing their language
study beyond the scholarship period and applying their critical
language skills later in their professional careers. The students'
language skills at the start of the institute should meet the
requirements for each language outlined above.
The Bureau should be consulted regarding the selection of
candidates and will approve the selection of finalists and alternates
for the program.
Information about the program, along with all accompanying
application materials, should be posted online. Applicant organizations
should propose a comprehensive outreach plan under Tab E to publicize
and recruit for the program at U.S. colleges and universities
nationwide.
The Bureau requests that student applicants apply to the program
through an online application system. An alternate paper-based
application should also be provided for those candidates unable to
apply online. These paper-based applications, however, must be entered
into the online system by grantee organization program staff. All
application materials should be available in a sortable, searchable,
electronically accessible database format that can be easily shared
with the Bureau upon request.
Orientations: The grantee organization will organize a substantive,
in-person, pre-departure orientation for all students. Working in
consultation with ECA, the orientation should include a security
briefing on the host country. The grantee organization may also need to
work in consultation with ECA and the U.S. Embassy in the host country
to arrange an in-country security briefing to be held by the Embassy's
Regional Security Officer. The orientations
[[Page 63824]]
should take place in Washington, DC. The applicant organization should
provide a compelling justification if they propose to host these
orientations in any other location. Comprehensive information packets
should be provided to all orientation participants. A sample of the
contents of these packets should be provided under Tab E.
At the end of the language study exchange, the cooperating agency
will organize an in-country closing workshop for the students prior to
departure from their host country, which will focus on summarizing the
experience, completing an evaluation, language testing, developing
plans for activities at home, and preparing for re-entry.
Project Activities: Describe in sufficient detail the major
components of the program, including project planning; publicity and
recruitment, including responding to and management of a significant
volume of queries and applications; the host venues; selection;
orientations (U.S. and overseas); assessment and testing; language
instruction; educational enrichment activities; cultural activities;
participant monitoring; and logistics.
Assessment and Testing: Standardized pre- and post-institute
testing should be done to determine participants' language proficiency
and progress.
Pre- and post-testing should measure the student's advancement in
language learning. The Bureau will work with the cooperating agency to
develop and implement an instrument to measure students' increased
language proficiency due to participation in this program. The data
need to be analyzed and reported by the cooperating agency to ECA for
the program, disaggregated by institute.
Alumni Tracking and Follow-On Activities: Alumni activities are an
important part of ECA's academic exchange programs. Alumni programming
in the form of newsletters and listservs provides critical program
follow-on and maximizes and extends the benefit of the participants'
program. The cooperating agency is strongly urged to outline how it
will creatively organize and financially support alumni activities at a
minimal cost to ECA.
Publicity: The proposal must describe how these intensive summer
language institutes will be publicized to media outlets, including
print, online, and broadcast to reach the widest possible audience of
qualified students. The cooperating agency will also work closely with
ECA to publicize the successes of the students involved in these
institutes, as well as the National Security Language Initiative as a
whole. The applicant organization should provide information on
successful media outreach campaigns it has conducted in the past under
Tab E.
In a cooperative agreement, ECA/A/E is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring. ECA/A/E
activities and responsibilities for this program are as follows:
(1) Review all print and online materials (including, but not
limited to, those for recruitment and orientation) regarding the
institutes before publication and dissemination. Review does not
include instructional materials, though the Bureau does reserve the
right to request these materials as needed.
(2) Work with the cooperating agency on a recruitment strategy.
(3) Work with the cooperating agency to publicize the program, and
the National Security Language Initiative (NSLI) as a whole, through
various media outlets.
(4) Review and approve application forms.
(5) Participate in selection committees.
(6) Confirm final selection of principal and alternate candidates.
(7) Work with cooperating agency to implement participant
orientations.
(8) Work with cooperating agency to offer standardized pre- and
post-institute testing of participants' language proficiency and
progress.
(9) Review project activity schedules for all institutes.
(10) Be kept informed by the cooperating agency of its progress at
each stage of the project's implementation through timely updates.
(11) Provide Bureau-approved evaluation surveys for completion by
participants after completion of program.
(12) Provide substantive input on alumni activities and follow-up
events.
Note: All materials, publicity, and correspondence related to
the program must acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State.
The Bureau will retain copyright use of and distribute materials
related to this program as it sees fit.
Funding: Grant funding will support costs including recruitment and
selection of participants, testing, orientation, travel, tuition and
maintenance costs, educational enhancements, cultural and social
activities, alumni activities, and administrative costs.
Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations. Please refer to the
Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document and the
Proposal Submission Instructions for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $6,000,000, pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Ceiling of Award Range: $6,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the proposed
start date is February 15, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: Approximately 14 to 18 months
after the start date, depending on the proposed program plan.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, ECA
reserves the right to renew the grant for two additional fiscal years.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
that are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
[[Page 63825]]
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates awarding a single grant not exceeding
$6,000,000 to support program and administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau urges applicants
to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its
programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package:
Please contact the Office of Academic Exchange Programs (ECA/A/E),
Room 234, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone (202) 453-8135, Fax (202) 453-8125, E-
mail: ManleyHL@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/A/E-07-01) located at the
top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria,
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Special Projects Officer Heidi Manley and
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 form that is part of the formal
application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support
for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in
carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries
whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau
``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Ideally programs use
logic models, a system that is designed to link a program's overall
goals and objectives to inputs, outputs and outcomes. Inputs are
resources, such as time money, materials, supplies and personnel, which
are consumed to produce outputs and outcomes. Outputs are the immediate
products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the scope or size of project
activities, but it cannot substitute for information about progress
towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include
the number of people trained or the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended
to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Expected
program outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the
RFGP, include:
(1) Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
(2) Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
(3) Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
school or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants and host
families, and others.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear program objectives, outcomes, and outputs at the outset of a
program. A draft monitoring and evaluation plan should include the
following components:
(1) A description of the program's goals and objectives and
anticipated outputs and outcomes.
(2) A description of how the cooperating agency and host
institutions intend to monitor and report program activities at the
output level. This may include the use of participant surveys that
focus on logistics and
[[Page 63826]]
administration, focus groups and interviews.
(3) Incorporation of pre- and post-testing for language acquisition
to measure one of the program's outcomes. The Bureau will work with the
cooperating agency to develop and implement an instrument to measure
students' increased language proficiency due to participation in this
program. The data need to be analyzed and reported by the cooperating
agency to ECA for the program, disaggregated by institute.
(4) Incorporation of three surveys using ECA's E-GOALS to measure
additional program outcomes. Administered by the Bureau's Office of
Policy and Evaluation (ECA/P), E-GOALS is an online system for
surveying program participants and collecting data about program
performance. All program participants will be required to take three
online surveys:
(a) Standardized pre-program surveys, at the beginning of the
program;
(b) Standardized post-program surveys, at the end of the program;
and
(c) Standardized follow-up surveys, approximately six months after
the conclusion of the program.
These surveys are designed to help the cooperating agency and ECA
assess: student satisfaction with the program; student attitudes and
views; the extent of learning and skill development (including
leadership); reliance on new learning and skills in their studies, at
work, and in their communities; and their efforts to share new ideas,
knowledge, and insights. Included in these surveys are questions
specific to ECA's internal reporting.
The cooperating agency will be expected to work with the Program
Officer and an evaluator from the Office of Policy and Evaluation to
refine and implement the survey instruments. To ensure proper
implementation of E-GOALS, the cooperating agency will be required to:
Provide the Program Officer and E-GOALS evaluator with all
contact information and bio-data of program participants.
Provide all participants with information about the E-
GOALS survey. Students must be advised that they are required to take
all three surveys, assuring them that the surveys are completely
confidential, anonymous, and used only for evaluative purposes.
Notify students of the E-GOALS survey link, information
about E-GOALS and survey instructions.
Allocate time for E-GOALS surveying prior to the students
departure from their return to the U.S. and at the end of the program.
Send reminder notices to students to take the follow-up
survey.
(5) A description of any additional methods planned to supplement
information obtained through language proficiency surveys and E-GOALS
to measure progress towards achievement of the program's objectives,
such as the use of focus groups and interviews, and how the data will
be analyzed and reported.
Overall, the quality of the applicant organization's monitoring and
evaluation plan will be judged on how well it (1) specifies intended
goals and objectives; (2) gives clear descriptions of how each outcome
and output will be measured; (3) identifies when particular outcomes
and outputs will be measured; and (4) incorporates and describes data
collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups).
The cooperating agency will be required to provide reports
analyzing evaluation findings to the Bureau in regular program reports.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe in your proposal your plans for: overall program
management, staffing, coordination with ECA and with overseas
institutes enrolling clusters of students, recruitment, testing,
orientation, and cultural enrichment opportunities for students. Please
provide a staffing plan that outlines the responsibilities of each
staff person and explains which staff members will be accountable for
each program responsibility.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Grant requests should not exceed $6,000,000. There must
be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants should provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification. Applicants should also provide copies of any
sub-grant agreements that would be implemented under terms of this
award.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program and additional budget
guidance are outlined in detail in the POGI document.
Please refer to the POGI and the PSI documents in the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3F. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: January 5, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E-07-01.
Methods of Submission
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy, and eight copies of the
application with Tabs A-E (for a total of ten copies) should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/E-07-01, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
[[Page 63827]]
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its(their) review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the 'Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support; Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726. Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance awards (cooperative agreements)
resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria: Please see proposal review criteria in the
accompanying Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI)
document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A 122, ``Cost
Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.'' Office of Management and
Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''. OMB Circular No. A 110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
1. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
2. Interim program and financial reports that include information
on the progress made on the program plan and program results to date.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants will
be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
1. Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
2. Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
[[Page 63828]]
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Heidi Manley,
Office of Academic Exchange Programs, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, ECA/A/E-07-01, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301
4th Street, SW., Room 234, Washington, DC 20547, Telephone (202) 453-
8135, Fax (202) 453-8125, E-mail ManleyHL@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/E-07-01.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: October 25, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-18280 Filed 10-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P