Washington: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 63253-63263 [E6-18222]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(60) and (c)(61) to
read as follows:
I
§ 52.1470
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(60) The following plan revision was
submitted on January 23, 2003, by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Clark County Department of Air
Quality and Environmental
Management.
(1) Sections 90 and 92, adopted June
22, 2000 by the Clark County Board of
Commissioners, and amended on
December 17, 2002.
(61) The following plan revision was
submitted on March 26, 2003, by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Clark County Department of Air
Quality and Environmental
Management.
(1) Section 93, adopted on June 22,
2000 by the Clark County Board of
Commissioners and amended on March
4, 2003; Section 94, adopted on June 22,
2000 by the Clark County Board of
Commissioners and amended on March
18, 2003; and, the ‘‘Construction
Activities Dust Control Handbook’’,
adopted June 22, 2000 by the Clark
County Board of Commissioners and
amended on March 18, 2003.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–18158 Filed 10–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL–8235–5]
Washington: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Washington has applied to
EPA for Final authorization of changes
to its hazardous waste program under
the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, as amended, (RCRA). EPA
has determined that these changes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
satisfy all requirements needed to
qualify for Final authorization, and is
authorizing the State’s changes through
this immediate final rule. EPA is
publishing this rule to authorize the
changes without a prior proposal
because we believe this action is not
controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on December 29, 2006,
unless EPA receives adverse written
comments on or before November 29,
2006. If we receive comments that
oppose this action, EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register
withdrawing this rule before it takes
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by EPA–R10–RCRA–2006–
0810 by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail:
kocourek.nina@epamail.epa.gov.
3. Fax: 206–553–8509.
4. Mail: Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA,
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and
Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail Stop
AWT–122, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
EPA–10–RCRA–2006–0810. EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public file
without change and may be made
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system which
means that EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public file and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63253
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket
visit the EPA Docket Center homepage
at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10 Library, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Seattle, Washington, 98101, phone, and
(206) 553–1289. The EPA Region 10
Library is open from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
and from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA, Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Mail Stop AWT–122,
Seattle, Washington 98101, phone
number (206) 553–6502, fax number
(206) 553–8509, e-mail:
kocourek.nina@epa.gov; or Patricia
Hervieux, Washington Department of
Ecology, 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey,
Washington 98503, phone (360) 407–
6756, e-mail: pher461@ecy.wa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authorization of Revisions to State
Program and of State-Initiated Changes
to Washington’s Hazardous Waste
Program
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs
Necessary?
States that have received final
authorization from EPA pursuant to
section 3006(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the
Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to
authorize the changes. Changes to State
programs may be necessary when
Federal or State statutory or regulatory
authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly,
States must change their programs
because of changes to EPA’s regulations
in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
63254
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260
through 266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Washington’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, with respect to these
revisions, we are granting Washington
final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program as described
in the revision authorization
application. Washington’s authorized
program will be responsible for carrying
out the aspects of the RCRA program as
described in its revised program
application, subject to the limitations of
RCRA, including the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in
authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
EPA will implement those HSWA
requirements and prohibitions for
which Washington has not been
authorized, including issuing HSWA
permits, until the State is granted
authorization to do so.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
C. What Is the Effect of This
Authorization Decision?
The effect of this authorization
decision is that a facility in Washington
subject to RCRA will continue to be
subject to the authorized State
requirements and to the Federal HSWA
provisions for which the State is not
authorized in order to comply with
RCRA. Washington has enforcement
responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations
of its program, but EPA retains its
independent enforcement authority
under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013,
and 7003, which authority includes,
among other things, the authority to:
• Perform inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether Washington has taken its
own actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Washington is
being authorized by this action are
already effective under State law, and
are not changed by this action.
D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule
Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before
this rule because we view this as a
routine program change and do not
expect comments that oppose this
approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register,
we are publishing a separate document
that proposes to authorize Washington’s
program changes. If we receive
comments, which oppose this
authorization, that document will serve
as a proposal to authorize these changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives
Comments That Oppose This Action?
If we receive comments that oppose
this action, EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register
withdrawing this rule before it takes
effect. EPA will then address public
comments in a later final rule based on
the proposed rule in this Federal
Register. If we receive comments that
oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous
waste program, we will withdraw that
part of this rule. However, the
authorization of program changes that
are not opposed by any comments will
become effective on December 29, 2006.
A Federal Register withdrawal
document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective and
which part is being withdrawn. You
may not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you must do so at
this time.
F. What Has Washington Previously
Been Authorized for?
Washington initially received final
authorization on January 30, 1986,
effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3782),
to implement the State’s dangerous
waste management program. EPA
granted authorization for changes to
Washington’s program on September 22,
1987, effective on November 23, 1987
(52 FR 35556); August 17, 1990,
effective October 16, 1990 (55 FR
33695); November 4, 1994, effective
November 4, 1994 (59 FR 55322);
February 29, 1996, effective April 29,
1996 (61 FR 7736); September 22, 1998,
effective October 22, 1998 (63 FR
50531); October 12, 1999, effective
January 11, 2000 (64 FR 55142); April
11, 2002, effective April 11, 2002 (67 FR
17636) and on April 14, 2006, effective
June 13, 2006 (71 FR 19442).
G. What Revisions Are We Authorizing
With This Action?
We are granting final authorization for
the revisions to Washington’s federallyauthorized program described in
Washington’s final complete program
revision application submitted to EPA
on June 26, 2006, and deemed complete
by EPA on July 25, 2006. We have made
a final determination, subject to receipt
of written comments that oppose this
action, that Washington’s hazardous
waste program revisions, as described in
this rule, satisfy the requirements
necessary for final authorization.
Regulatory revisions that are less
stringent than the Federal program
requirements and those regulatory
revisions that are broader in scope than
the Federal program requirements are
not authorized. Washington’s
authorized hazardous waste program, as
amended by these provisions, remains
equivalent to, consistent with, and is no
less stringent than the Federal RCRA
program. Therefore, we grant final
authorization for the following program
changes as identified in Table 1 and
Table 2 below.
The provisions listed in these tables
are from the Washington Administrative
Code (WAC) and are analogous to the
RCRA regulations as indicated in the
tables. The RCRA regulations are those
as published in 40 CFR parts 260
through 265, 268, 270, and 279, as of
July 1, 2003, unless otherwise noted.
Table 1 identifies new State rules that
EPA is authorizing as equivalent or
more stringent to the Federal program,
and Table 2 identifies those Stateinitiated changes to its previouslyauthorized program. (Note, in Table 2
some State provisions have no direct
Federal analog but are related to
particular paragraphs, sections, or parts
of the Federal hazardous waste
requirements in the 40 CFR). All of the
referenced analogous State authorities
were legally adopted and effective as of
January 1, 2005.
TABLE 1.—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM 1
Checklist 4
Federal requirements
17D 3 ................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Waste Minimization HSWA
Codification Rule.
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Federal Register
50 FR 28702, 7/15/85 ............
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Analogous state authority
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
180(1); 370(1); 380(1);
805(1)(b), 805(1)(c).
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
390(1);
30OCR1
380(1)(q);
810(11)(c);
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
63255
TABLE 1.—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM 1—Continued
Checklist 4
Federal requirements
Federal Register
Analogous state authority
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
30 .....................
108 ...................
Biennial Report Correction .....
Toxicity Characteristic Revisions; Technical Corrections.
Imports and Exports of Hazardous Waste: Implementation of OECD Council Decision.
Military Munitions Rule ...........
Conformance With the Carbamate Vacatur.
Emergency Revision of the
Carbamate Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDR).
Hazardous Waste Combustors; Revised Standards.
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Standards for Combustors.
51 FR 28556, 8/8/86 ..............
57 FR 30657, 7/10/92 ............
390(2)(g), 390(2)(h), 390(2)(i).
071(3)(aa); 071(3)(g)(i); 400(3)(a) Incorporated by Reference
(IBR) 045(1)
120(6); 170(6); 070(1); 230(2); 280(1), 280(2); 600(3)(f);
950; 960; 230(1) IBR 045(1); 240(11); 250(1); 290(1)(a),
290(1)(b); 370(6); 525(1)(b)(ii), 525(1)(b)(iii); 573(16);
573(27), 573(34), 573(38), 573(38)(d).
578(3); 578(4)(d), 578(4)(d)(i), 578(4)(d)(ii), 578(4)(e).
9904; 082(1); 9903; 082(4) IBR 045(1); 9905; 140(2)(a) IBR
045(1).
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
LDR Phase IV—Technical
Correction.
Accumulation Time for Waste
Water Treatment Sludges.
64 FR 56469, 10/20/99 ..........
152 ...................
156 3 .................
159 ...................
161 ...................
168 ...................
182 ...................
183 ...................
184 2 .................
187 ...................
188 ...................
189 ...................
192A 2 ..............
192B .................
193 ...................
194 2 .................
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
195 ...................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Petroleum Refining Process
Wastes—Clarification.
Hazardous Air Pollutant
Standards; Technical Corrections.
Chlorinated Aliphatics Listing
and LDR for Newly Identified Wastes.
Mixture and Derived—From
Rules Revisions.
LDR Correction .......................
Change of Official EPA Mailing Address.
Mixture and Derived—From
Rules Revision II.
Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing Wastes Identification
and Listing.
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
61 FR 16290, 4/12/96 ............
62 FR 6622, 2/12/97 ..............
62 FR 32974, 6/17/97 ............
62 FR 45568, 8/28/97 ............
63 FR 33782, 6/19/98 ............
64 FR 52828, 9/30/99 amended at 64 FR 63209, 11/19/
99.
65 FR 12378, 3/8/00 ..............
830(4)(j), 830(4)(j)(i), 830(4)(j)(ii), 830 Appendix I—L. 9.;
805(7)(b)(viii).
040; 670(1)(b), 670(1)(b)(i), 670(1)(b)(ii), 670(1)(c),
670(1)(d); 680(2); 400(3)(a) IBR 045(1); 510(1)(a) IBR
045(1); 806(4)(f), 806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n); 830 Appendix I—
A.8 and I.9.; 807 Intro.; 811 IBR 045(1).
9904; 082(1); 200(1)(f); 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
64 FR 36365, 6/8/00 ..............
200(1)(e), 200(1)(f); 200(4)(a), 200(4)(a)(i), 200(4)(a)(ii),
200(4)(a)(iii),
200(4)(a)(iv),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(I), 200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(II), 200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(III),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(III) 1st and 2nd Bullets, 200(4)(a)(iv)(B),
200(4)(a)(iv)(C),
200(4)(a)(v)(D),
200(4)(a)(iv)(E),
200(4)(b), 200(4)(c).
9904; 140(2) IBR 045(1).
65 FR 42292, 7/10/00 ............
670(1)(b)(i), 670(1)(b)(iii); 830(4)(j)(i).
65 FR 67068, 11/8/00 ............
9904; 082(1); 082(4) IBR 045(1); 9905; 140(2)(a) IBR
045(1).
66 FR 27266, 5/16/01 ............
66 FR 27266, 5/16/01 ............
66 FR 34374, 6/28/01 ............
070(2)(a),
070(2)(c)(i),
070(2)(c)(ii),
070(2)(c)(ii)(A),
070(2)(c)(ii)(B); 071(2), 071(3)(bb), 071(3)(o); 081(3);
082(3).
140(2) IBR 045(1).
110(3)(a).
66 FR 50332, 10/3/01 ............
071(2); 081(3); and 082(3).
66 FR 58258, 11/20/01; 67
FR 17119, 4/9/02.
071(3)(kk),
071(3)(kk)(i),
071(3)(kk)(ii),
071(3)(kk)(iii),
071(3)(kk)(iv), 071(3)(kk)(v); 9904; 082(1), 082(4) IBR
045(1); 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
63256
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM 1—Continued
Checklist 4
Federal requirements
Federal Register
Analogous state authority
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
196 ...................
Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU) Amendments.
67 FR 2962, 1/22/02 ..............
197 ...................
Hazardous Air Pollutant
Standards for Combustors:
Interim Standards.
Hazardous Air Pollutant
Standards for Combustors:
Corrections.
Zinc Fertilizer Rule .................
67 FR 6792, 2/13/02 ..............
040; 64650(1), 64650(2); 64640, 64640(1); 64650(3),
64650(3)(a),
64650(3)(a)(i),
64650(3)(a)(ii),
64650(3)(a)(ii)(A),
64650(3)(a)(ii)(B),
64650(3)(a)(iii),
64650(3)(b), 64650(3)(c), 64650(3)(c)(i), 64650(3)(c)(ii),
64650(3)(c)(iii), 64650(3)(c)(iv), 64650(3)(d), 64650(3)(e);
64670(1), 64670(1)(a), 64670(1)(b), 64670(2); 64660(1),
64660(1)(a), 64660(1)(b), 64660(1)(c), 64660(1)(d),
64660(1)(e),
64660(1)(f),
64660(1)(g),
64660(2),
64660(2)(a),
64660(2)(b),
64660(2)(c),
64660(3),
64660(3)(a), 64660(3)(b), 64660(3)(c), 64660(3)(c)(i),
64660(3)(c)(ii),
64660(3)(c)(ii)(A),
64660(3)(c)(ii)(B),
64660(3)(d),
64660(3)(d)(i),
64660(3)(d)(i)(A),
64660(3)(d)(i)(A)(I), 64660(3)(d)(i)(A)(II), 64660(3)(d)(i)(B),
64660(3)(d)(i)(C),
64660(3)(d)(ii),
64660(3)(d)(iii),
64660(3)(d)(iv), 64660(3)(d)(iv)(A), 64660(3)(d)(iv)(B),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(C), 64660(3)(d)(iv)(D), 64660(3)(d)(iv)(E),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(F),
64660(3)(d)(v),
64660(3)(d)(v)(A),
64660(3)(d)(v)(B), 64660(3)(d)(v)(C), 64660(3)(d)(v)(D),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(I),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(II),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(III),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(IV),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(V),
64660(3)(d)(vi),
64660(3)(d)(vii),
64660(3)(e),
64660(3)(e)(i), 64660(3)(e)(ii), 64660(3)(e)(iii), 64660(3)(f),
64660(3)(f)(iv),
64660(3)(f)(i),
64660(3)(f)(i)(A),
64660(3)(f)(i)(B),
64660(3)(f)(ii),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(A),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(B),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(C),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(D),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(E),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(F),
64660(3)(f)(iii),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(I),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(II),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(III),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(IV),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(V),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(B), 64660(3)(f)(iv), 64660(4), 64660(4)(a),
64660(4)(b), 64660(4)(b)(i), 64660(4)(b)(ii), 64660(5),
64660(6), 64660(7), 64660(8); 64650(4); 64690 IBR
045(1);
646910(1),
646910(1)(a),
646910(1)(b),
646910(1)(b)(i),
646910(1)(b)(ii),
646910(1)(b)(iii),
646910(1)(c),
646910(2),
646910(3),
646910(4),
646910(5), 646910(5)(a), 646910(5)(b), 646910(5)(c),
646910(5)(d), 646910(5)(e), 646910(5)(f), 646910(6),
646910(7).
670(1)(b)(i), 670(1)(b)(iv), 670(1)(b)(iv)(A), 670(1)(b)(iv)(B);
400(3)(a) IBR 045(1); 806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n); 807 Introduction; 811 IBR 045(1); 841 IBR 045(1).
510(1)(a) IBR 045(1); 830(4)(j)(i).
Treatment Variance for Radioactively Contaminated Batteries.
Hazardous Air Pollutant
Standards for Combustors:
Corrections 2.
Performance Track and
Amendments.
67 FR 62618, 10/7/02 ............
071(3),
071(3)(pp),
071(3)(pp)(i),
071(3)(pp)(i)(A),
071(3)(pp)(i)(B),
071(3)(pp)(ii),
071(3)(pp)(iii),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(A),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(B),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(C),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(D),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(E),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(F);
505(1)(b)(i), 505(1)(b)(iii), 505(1)(b)(iii)(A), 505(1)(b)(iii)(B);
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
67 FR 77687, 12/19/02 ..........
806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n); 807 Introduction; 811 IBR 045(1).
69 FR 21737, 4/22/04 amended 69 FR 62217, 10/25/04.
200(5) IBR 045(1), 200(5)(a), 200(5)(b), 200(5)(c), 200(5)(d),
200(5)(e).
198 ...................
200 ...................
201 ...................
202 ...................
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
204 2, 204.1 2 ...
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
67 FR 6968, 2/14/02 ..............
67 FR 48393, 7/24/02 ............
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
63257
TABLE 1.—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM 1—Continued
Checklist 4
Federal Register
Federal requirements
Analogous state authority
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
040;
077(2),
077(3);
600(3)(o)(ii),
600(3)(o)(iii);
400(2)(c)(xi)(B), 400(2)(c)(xi)(C); 573(4)(d) IBR 045(1);
800(7)(c)(iii)(B), 800(7)(c)(iii)(C); 573(3)(a), 573(3)(b),
573(3)(b)(i),
573(3)(b)(ii),
573(3)(c)(i),
573(3)(c)(ii),
573(4)(a), 573(4)(b), 573(4)(b)(i), 573(4)(b)(ii), 573(4)(c)(i),
573(4)(c)(ii);
573(9)(b),
573(9)(b)(i),
573(9)(b)(ii),
573(9)(b)(ii)(A)–(H), 573(9)(b)(iii)(A), 573(9)(b)(iii)(A)(I),
573(9)(b)(iii) (9)(A)(II), 573(9)(b)(iii)(B), 573(9)(b)(iii)(C),
573(10)(b), 573(10)(c), 573(11)(c)(ii), 573(19)(b)(iv),
573(19)(b)(v), 573(20)(b), 573(20)(b)(i), 573(20)(b)(ii),
573(20)(b)(ii)(A)–(H), 573(20)(b)(iii)(A), 573(20)(b)(iii)(A)(I),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A)(II), 573(20)(b)(iii)(B), 573(20)(b)(iii)(C),
573(21)(b), 573(21)(c), 573(22)(c)(ii), 573(26)(a)(ii),
573(26)(b)(ii), 573(37)(a)(ii).
120(4).
209 2 .................
Mercury Containing Equipment, Universal Waste.
70 FR 45508, 8/5/05 ..............
13, 79 (Consolidated Checklist C2).
Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste—Recycling Facility Requirements.
IVA, IVB, 34,
64, 78, 102
(Consolidated
Checklist C5/
C6).
Standards for Owners and
Operators of Hazardous
Waste Treatment Storage
and Disposal Facilities—
Waste Analysis Plan.
V, 13, 71 (Consolidated
Checklist
C9 2).
Permits by Rule—Subpart F—
Special Forms of Permits.
54, 85, 94, 168,
188, 198
(Consolidated
Checklist C9).
Hazardous Waste Management Facilities—Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces.
50 FR 614, 1/4/85; amended
50 FR 14216, 4/11/85 and
50 FR 33541, 8/20/85; 55
FR 25454, 6/21/90.
45 FR 33232, 5/19/80; 51 FR
40572, 11/7/86 amended 52
FR 21010, 6/4/87; 54 FR
33376, 8/14/89; 55 FR
22520, 6/1/90; 57 FR 8086,
3/6/92.
48 FR 14228, 4/12/83,
amended 48 FR 30113, 6/
30/83; 50 FR 614, 1/4/85;
amended 50 FR 14216, 4/
11/85 and 50 FR 33541, 8/
20/85; 55 FR 2322, 1/23/90.
53 FR 37912, 9/28/88 amended 53 FR 41649, 10/24/88;
56 FR 7134, 2/21/91; 56 FR
32688, 7/17/91; 63 FR
33782, 6/19/98; 65 FR
42292, 7/10/00; amended
66 FR 24270, 5/14/01 and
66 FR 35087, 7/3/01; 67 FR
6968, 2/14/02.
300(1), 300(2); 040.
802(5)(a), 802(5)(b); 040.
830(4)(g), 830(4)(g)(i), 830(4)(g)(i)(A), 830(4)(g)(i)(B),
830(4)(g)(i)(C), 830(4)(g)(i)(D), 830(4)(g)(i)(E), 830(4)(j),
830(4)(j)(i), 830(4)(j)(ii).
1 For further discussion on where the revised State rules differ from the Federal rules refer to Section G. below, the authorization revision application, and the administrative record for this decision.
2 State rule contains some more stringent provisions. For identification of more stringent State provisions refer to the authorization revision application and the administrative record for this decision.
3 State requested authorization for portions of the Federal regulation. For identification of which portions are authorized refer to the authorization revision application and the administrative record for this decision.
4 Checklists generally reflect changes made to the Federal regulations pursuant to a particular Federal Register notice and EPA publishes
these Checklists as aids for States to use for the development of their authorization application. (See EPA’s RCRA State Authorization Web
page at https://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/state/rcra.)
TABLE 2.—STATE INITIATED CHANGES
Analogous Federal 40 CFR citation1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
State requirement and reason for change (WAC 173–303–* * *)
40 ‘‘Partial closure’’ definition, Internal citation corrected ........................
045(1), Date of incorporation by reference updated ................................
045(2)(a) Federal citation for a delegable provision moved to next subsubsection.
045(2)(b), Citation corrected ....................................................................
045(2)(c), Citation corrected .....................................................................
045(3), Clarification of delegable federal citation not incorporated by
reference.
045(4), New subsection—substitution of state for federal terms .............
060(1), Clarification of ID# issuance and state-only transfer facility registration number issuance.
060(2), Corrections for new form name ...................................................
060(5), Corrections for new form name ...................................................
070(2)(c), Hazardous debris exclusion moved to 071(3)(qq) ..................
070(7)(c)(ii), Citation added ......................................................................
070(8)(b)(iii)(C), Citation updated .............................................................
070(8)(d), Clarification of application of used oil standards to CESQGs
071(3)(k), Citation corrected .....................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
260.10.
No direct federal analog.
260.20–260.22.
264.301(l).
268.5, 268.6, 268.10–14, 268.42(b), 268.44 except 268.44(a)–(g).
260.20–22.
No direct federal analog.
262.12(a)&(c).
262.12(b).
262.12 related.
261.3(f).
261.5(c) and 262.10 related.
261.5(f)(3) & 261.5(g)(3) related.
261.6(a)(4).
No direct federal analog.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
63258
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2.—STATE INITIATED CHANGES—Continued
Analogous Federal 40 CFR citation1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
State requirement and reason for change (WAC 173–303–* * *)
071(3)(o), SIC changed to NAIC Codes ..................................................
071(3)(cc), SIC changed to NAIC Codes .................................................
071(3)(hh), SIC changed to NAIC Codes ................................................
071(3)(nn), State-only drug exclusion ......................................................
081(3), Clarification of ‘‘mixture’’ language ..............................................
082(3), Clarification of ‘‘mixture’’ language ..............................................
090(5)(a)(iii), Citation deletion to conform to federal rule ........................
100(5)(b)(i), Clarification ...........................................................................
100(6), Publication reference update .......................................................
100(6)(d), Obsolete reference deleted .....................................................
104, State-only waste codes identified in one location ............................
110(3)(g)(vii), Spelling correction and year update ..................................
120(3) .......................................................................................................
120(4) .......................................................................................................
120(4)(c)(v)–(viii) ......................................................................................
Closure requirements for recycling and used oil facilities (new in 2005).
140(2)(a), Citation added Clarification .....................................................
161(6), 5 years added as retention period for labpacks ..........................
170(5), Citations corrected .......................................................................
190(5)(b), Marking directions corrected ...................................................
200(1)(b)(i)&(ii), Citation corrected ...........................................................
200(1)(b)(ii)&(iii), Stress of installation added for equivalence with federal rule.
200(1)(b)(iv)(B), Citation added for equivalence with federal rule at unnumbered paragraph following (B).
200(1)(e)(i), Citation added for equivalence with federal rule .................
201(2)(e), Citations corrected; generators of between 220 and 2200
pounds are subject to secondary containment.
210(2), Corrections for new form name ...................................................
240(6)(a), Corrections for new form name ...............................................
283(2), Citation corrected .........................................................................
290(1)(a)(i) through (vi), Subsection renumbered ....................................
320(2)(a), Edit for clarity ...........................................................................
380(1)(i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), (o), Citations corrected ..............................
380(1)(p), Reference added .....................................................................
390(1), Deleted obsolete form title ...........................................................
395(1)(d), Uniform Fire Code changed to International Fire Code ..........
400(3)(c)(ix), Closure notification clarified ................................................
400(3)(c)(xi)(C) & (G), Citations corrected ...............................................
500(1), Reference to 120(3) & (5) added ................................................
505(1) Intro, Reference to 120(3) added .................................................
505(1)(b), State fertilizer registration requirements moved from (1)(b)(i)
to (1)(b)(iv).
506(1), Reference to 120(3) added ..........................................................
510(1), Reference to 120(3) added ..........................................................
510(1)(b)(i)(B) and Note, Clarification; Previous (C) deleted and consolidated into (B) References to state-only W001 removed.
515(5)(a), State waste code W001 changed to WPCB ...........................
515(9)(a), Closure requirements for recycling and used oil facilities
(new in 2005).
515(13), Used oil testing (new subsection) ..............................................
520 Intro, Reference to 120(3) added ......................................................
522(1), Reference to 120(3) added ..........................................................
525(1), Reference to 120(3) added ..........................................................
600(3)(e), Citation correction ....................................................................
600(3)(g), Citation correction ....................................................................
610(1)(c), (previous ‘‘c’’ became ‘‘d’’ & ‘‘d’’ became ‘‘e’’) Closure requirements for recycling and used oil facilities (new in 2005).
610(2)(b)(i), Closure standard wording corrected ....................................
610(3)(c)(i), Closure notification clarified .................................................
610(12) New subsection, Closure requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(1)(e) New sub-subsection, Closure requirements for recycling and
used oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(2)(a), Closure requirements for recycling and used oil facilities
(new in 2005); Closure plan definition modified to include recycling
and used oil processors.
620(3), New un-numbered exception paragraph, Closure requirements
for recycling and used oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(4)(a), Reference to used oil and recycling facilities added, Closure
requirements for recycling and used oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(4)(b), Clarification ..............................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
261.3(c)(2)(ii)(A).
261.4(a)(12).
261.4(a)(18).
No direct federal analog.
261.3(c).
261.3(b)(2).
261.21.
No direct federal analog.
No direct federal analog.
No direct federal analog.
No direct federal analog.
260.11(a)(15).
261.6(a)(2).
261.6(c)(1).
261.6(c)(2).
Part 268.
No direct federal analog.
262.10(i).
No direct federal analog 262.30–260.33 related.
262.34(a)(1) intro and (a)(1)(i) & (ii).
262.34(a)(1) intro and (a)(1)(ii) & (iii).
262.34(a)(1)(iv) paragraph following (B).
262.34(a)(4).
262.34(d).
262.40(b).
263.12 related.
No direct federal analog.
264/265.12(a).
264/265.15 except (b)(4)&(d).
264.73(b)(8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), and (16).
264.73(b)(17).
264/265 Intro.
264/265.17.
265.112(d)(1) related.
265 related.
No federal analog.
No direct federal analog.
No direct federal analog.
261.4(b)(12).
266.30(a) (1990 CFR).
266.30(b) intro and (b)(1) (1990 CFR) 266.100(b)(1) (1999 CFR).
279.12.
279.52 related.
279 related.
266.80(a).
No federal analog.
266.70 except 266.70(v)(3).
270.1(c)(2) 264.1(b).
270.1(c)(2) 264.1(b).
264.110 related.
264.111(c).
264.112(d).
264.112 related.
264.140 related.
264.141(a)–(e) related.
264.142 related.
264.143 related.
264.143.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
63259
TABLE 2.—STATE INITIATED CHANGES—Continued
Analogous Federal 40 CFR citation1
State requirement and reason for change (WAC 173–303–* * *)
620(4)(c), New sub-subsection, Closure requirements for recycling and
used oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(6)(a)(i), Partially funded trust funds no longer allowed for closure ..
620(6)(a)(v), Minimum ratings of financial strength for financial and insurance institutions required.
620(6)(a)(vi), Minimum tangible net worth increased to $20M ................
620(8)(a), Closure requirements for recycling and used oil facilities
(new in 2005); Liability requirements modified to apply to recyclers
and used oil processors.
620(8)(a)(i), Minimum ratings of financial strength for financial and insurance institutions required.
620(8)(a)(ii), Allow Ecology to file claims against liability insurance .......
620(8)(a)(iii), Minimum tangible net worth increased to $20M ................
620(8)(b)&(f), Citations corrected .............................................................
630(8)(a) and (b), Uniform Fire Code references changed to International Fire Code.
640(2)(c)(iv)(B) Note, Reference to obsolete guidance replaced with list
of publications that may be used.
640(4)(i), Citations corrected ....................................................................
640(4)(i)(iii) Note, Reference to obsolete guidance replaced with list of
publications that may be used.
640(7)(d)(i)–(iii), (ii) and (iii) deleted; Spill requirements modified—must
be reported immediately.
640(7)(d)(i)(F), Section 360 applies in the event of emergency ..............
645(1)(a)(ii), Citations corrected ...............................................................
645(10)(h) Lettering corrected, (h) was added as a reserved sub-subsection since it had been missing from previous text. No text is missing. Two federal provisions (g) and (h) are combined at (g) in the
State rules.
64690 (previous 646(8)), Clarification that ‘‘director’’ means ‘‘department’’.
670(1)(c)(i)–(ii) ..........................................................................................
670(1)(c)(iii) ..............................................................................................
670(1)(d) ...................................................................................................
Re-lettered from (b) to (c) and (c) to (d) to accommodated new (b).
680(3), Citation corrected .........................................................................
690(1)(c), Citation clarified .......................................................................
691(1)(b) Intro, Citation clarified ...............................................................
691(1)(c), Paragraph updated ..................................................................
692(2) Note, Citations corrected ..............................................................
802(3), Citation corrected .........................................................................
802(4)(c)(viii), Citation corrected ..............................................................
803(3)(c), SIC changed to NAIC Codes ..................................................
805(7)(a)(v), Citation correction ...............................................................
806(6), Note added ..................................................................................
830 Appendix I—6. and 7.a. & b., Citations corrected ............................
830 Appendix I—N.1. and 2., Citations corrected ...................................
910(1)(c), Minimum public comment period reduced from 45 to 21 days
910(6)(f)(i), Minimum public comment period reduced from 45 to 21
days.
960, Changed to be consistent with Hazardous Waste Management
Act.
9904 State sources, State PCB waste code changed from W001 to
WPCB.
1 Reference
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
264.145.
264.145.
264.145.
264.147(a).
264.147(a).
264.147(a).
264.147(a).
264.147(b), 264.147(f)–(j).
264.176.
264.191(b)(5)(ii), Note.
264.193.
264.193.
264.196.
264.196.
264.90(a).
264.99.
264.554.
264.340(b) & (c).
264.340 related.
264.340(d).
264.602.
264.1030(c).
264.1050(b) intro.
264.1050(c).
264.1081–1091.
270.60(b).
270.60(c).
270.13.
270.72(a)(5).
270.10(h).
270.42 Appendix I.
270.42 Appendix I.
260.20(c).
268 related.
RCRA 7003 related.
261.31(a), 261.32.
to ‘‘No direct federal analog’’ is for informational purposes and is not authorized.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules
Different From the Federal Rules?
Under RCRA 3009, EPA may not
authorize State rules that are less
stringent than the Federal program. Any
State rules that are less stringent do not
supplant the Federal regulations. State
rules that are broader in scope than the
Federal program requirements are
allowed but are not authorized. State
rules that are equivalent to, and State
rules that are more stringent than, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
No direct federal analog.
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
Federal program may be authorized, in
which case they are enforceable by EPA.
This section discusses certain rules
where EPA has made the finding that
the State program is more stringent and
will be authorized; it discusses those
State rules which are being authorized
as different but equivalent to the Federal
program; it discusses those rules where
the State program is broader in scope,
and cannot be authorized. Certain
portions of the Federal program are not
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
delegable to the States because of the
Federal government’s special role in
foreign policy matters and because of
national concerns that arise with certain
decisions. EPA does not delegate
import/export functions. Under RCRA
regulations found in 40 CFR part 262,
EPA will continue to implement
requirements for import/export
functions. The State amended its import
and export rules to include 40 CFR part
262, subpart H in accordance with the
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
63260
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal rule on Imports and Exports
Regulations of Hazardous Waste:
Implementation of Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) Council Decision
(61 FR 16290, 4/12/96). The State’s
counterpart to this Federal rule is found
at WAC 173–303–120(6), although EPA
will continue to implement those
requirements. Not all program
differences are discussed in this section
because Washington writes its own
version of the Federal hazardous waste
rules. Persons must consult Tables 1
and 2, in Section G above, for the
specific State regulations that EPA is
authorizing in this final rule.
1. More Stringent
States are allowed to seek
authorization for State requirements that
are more stringent than Federal
requirements. EPA has authority to
authorize and enforce those parts of a
State’s program EPA finds to be more
stringent than the Federal program. This
section does not discuss each more
stringent finding made by EPA, but
persons can locate such sections by
consulting Table 1 in Section G above,
as well as by reviewing the docket for
this rule. The State program is
authorized for each more stringent
requirement as part of this rulemaking.
The State revised its previouslyauthorized permits-by-rule provision at
WAC–173–303–802(5)(a) and (5)(b) to
allow off-site dangerous waste,
including federally-regulated waste, to
be received at a wastewater treatment
unit. These State provisions are
considered broader in scope for Stateonly wastes and more stringent for the
federally-regulated wastes since the
State rule includes additional
safeguards that the Federal requirements
found at 40 CFR 270.1(c)(2(iv) and (v)
do not include, such as: (1) Requirement
that the source of the wastewater be
identified; (2) requirement that the
generator keep an operating record
when federally-regulated wastes are
received from off-site, and (3)
requirement that wastewater received
from off-site be generated within the
same industry and be able to be
effectively treated by the wastewater
treatment unit.
The State adopted portions of the
Federal Mercury-Containing Equipment,
Universal Waste Rule (70 FR 45508, 8/
5/05). The State’s rule is based on EPA’s
proposed rule (67 FR 40508, 6/12/02)
and until the State revises its rules to
include the changes EPA made with its
final rule (70 FR 45508, 8/5/05) the
State’s program will be more stringent
than the Federal program. The State’s
rule is more stringent because it does
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
not include the following Federal
provisions: the definition for ‘‘ampule’’
(40 CFR 260.10); merging ‘‘mercurycontaining thermostats’’ with ‘‘mercurycontaining equipment’’ into one
universal waste category (40 CFR
260.10); and revised waste management
standards for mercury-containing
equipment that have open housings
instead of ampules (40 CFR 273.13).
Additionally, the State’s definitions of
small and large quantity handler of
universal waste found at WAC 173–
303–040 are more stringent than the
Federal rule (40 CFR 273.9) because (1)
the State’s rule regulates universal waste
lamps at a lower accumulation
threshold than the Federal requirement
and (2) the State’s rule does not include
the Federal language that allows
equipment with non-contained
elemental mercury to be managed as
universal waste.
The State incorporated by reference
most of the Federal Performance Track
Rule (69 FR 21737, 4/22/04) into State
law (WAC 173–303–200(5)). However,
there are some Federal provisions for
which the State included its own
internal citations, which include the
following more stringent requirements:
aisle space requirement for containers
(WAC 173–303–630(5)(c)); risk labeling
(WAC 173–303–200(1)(d)); verification
of training (WAC 173–303–300(2)(c));
cause of incident (WAC 173–303–
360(2)(k)(viii)); and description of
corrective action taken to prevent
reoccurrence of the incident (WAC–
173–303–360(2)(k)(ix)); and the
requirement that drip pads remain
subject to closure standards (WAC 173–
303–675(6)(b)).
We also consider the State’s new
requirement for accumulating dangerous
waste on-site for waste water treatment
sludges (WAC 173–303–200(1)(e) and
(f)) to be more stringent than the Federal
requirement (40 CFR 262.34(a)(4))
because the State rule-unlike the
Federal rule-requires compliance with
‘‘general inspections’’ (WAC 173–303–
320) in addition to the other Federal
requirements.
The State’s revised mixture rules
(WAC 173–303–071(2); 081(3); and
082(3)) are more stringent than the
Federal rules because the State rules do
not include all of the Federal
wastewater mixture exclusions as
identified in the Federal Mixture and
Derived-From Rule Revisions (66 FR
27266, 516/01; and 66 FR 50332, 10/3/
01).
2. Different But Equivalent
The following State requirements are
different than the Federal requirements,
but EPA has determined that they are
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
nevertheless equivalent to the Federal
program.
In 2005, the State enacted its
Hazardous Waste Facilities Initiative
(HWFI), which among other things
makes many recycling activities subject
to closure plan requirements, pollution
liability coverage requirements, and
financial assurance requirements. In
contrast, under the Federal rules,
hazardous waste recycling activities are
generally exempt from hazardous waste
requirements and therefore are not
subject to closure plans, pollution
liability coverage and financial
assurance. Additionally, the State
amended its previously authorized
provision (WAC 173–303–120(4)) to be
more similar to the Federal rule (40 CFR
261.6(c)(2)) in that the State removed
the provision that specified that
recyclable materials would be
considered stored unless they were
moved into an active recycling process
within 24 hours The State revised its
rule so that it can determine on a caseby-case basis whether recyclable
materials received from off-site are not
stored if they are moved into an active
recycling process in a period of time not
to exceed 72 hours. While the Federal
analog does not specify a timeframe
after which holding recyclable materials
is considered storage, EPA Region 1
authorized the State of Vermont for a
similar provision (see 64 FR 51702,
September 24, 1999), stating ‘‘EPA has
previously agreed that States
administering the RCRA program have
some discretion to determine that short
periods of accumulation by recyclers of
incoming material do not constitute
storage and would not trigger the RCRA
storage permitting requirements’’.
Region 1 determined that Vermont’s
rule, which allows up to three days
without a storage permit, was equivalent
to the Federal program and therefore
federally approvable. Based on the
Vermont authorization and based on the
fact that Washington’s comprehensive
recycling program approach will result
in significantly better environmental
performance by affected facilities, EPA
has determined Washington’s rule to be
equivalent to the Federal program and
federally approvable.
The State revised its previouslyauthorized waste analysis plan
requirements at WAC 173–303–300(1)
and (2). The State amended its rule to
provide clarity for Treatment, Storage
and Disposal (TSD) facilities. The State
rule is worded differently than the
Federal rule at 40 CFR 264.13(a)(1) and
(2); however, we consider it to be
equivalent to the Federal program.
While the Federal rule states that a TSD
facility must obtain a detailed chemical
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
and physical analysis of a representative
sample of the waste, 40 CFR 264.13(2)
states that the analysis may include data
developed under 40 CFR part 261 and
existing published or documented data
on the hazardous waste or on hazardous
waste generated from similar processes.
Federal guidance allows the use of
knowledge rather than direct testing
under certain circumstances (Waste
Analysis at Facilities That Generate,
Treat, Store, and Dispose of Hazardous
Waste—A Guidance Manual OSWER
9938.4–03, April 1994). Therefore, the
State amended its rule to require
documentation when a TSD facility
relies upon such knowledge other than
testing. The State rule clarifies when the
use of knowledge, as defined in WAC
173–303–040, is acceptable, and
requires documentation to ensure that
such knowledge is sufficient and used
appropriately. Overall, EPA believes
that the State rule ensures that wastes
will be properly designated and
managed in a safe and protective
manner, and therefore we have
determined that the State rule is
equivalent to the Federal program.
3. Broader in Scope
States are not allowed to seek
authorization for State requirements that
are broader in scope than Federal
requirements. EPA does not have
authority to authorize and enforce those
parts of a State’s program EPA finds to
be broader in scope than the Federal
program. However, they remain part of
the State’s hazardous waste program
and the regulated community must
comply with them in accordance with
State law. Such rules are identified in
the State’s authorization revision
application, and include, but are not
limited to, the following:
The State adopted the Federal Zinc
Fertilizer Rule (67 FR 48393, 7/24/02)
but did not adopt the Federal exclusions
found at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20) and (21)
for hazardous secondary materials used
to make zinc fertilizers. Therefore, the
State rule as applied to waste excluded
under Federal rules is broader in scope
than the Federal requirements.
Additionally, the State added a Stateonly provision at WAC 173–303–
505(1)(b)(iv) for waste-derived fertilizer
registration which is not a Federal
requirement and is considered broader
in scope than the Federal program.
The State adopted the Federal
Hazardous Waste Combustors Revised
Standards (63 FR 33782, 6/19/98) but
did not adopt the Federal comparable or
syngas fuel exclusion (40 CFR 261.38),
and therefore is broader in scope as
applied to waste excluded under the
Federal rules because the State rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
considers these wastes to be solid
wastes.
4. Partial Rules Adopted
In addition to the program differences
described above, the State’s program has
also elected to adopt portions of the
following Federal rules. We have found
the State portions to these Federal rules
to be consistent with and equivalent to
the Federal program.
The State’s program includes those
requirements of the Federal Waste
Minimization Rule (50 FR 28702,
7/15/95) that are applicable to owners
and operators of hazardous waste TSD
facilities. The Federal waste
minimization requirements applicable
to generators (40 CFR 262.41(a)(6)–(8))
were not adopted by the State because
generators must comply with the Stateonly pollution prevention planning
requirements.
EPA implements the Boilers and
Industrial Furnaces (BIF) program in
Washington State under its HSWA
authority, although in order to fully
implement the BIF program the State
must adopt and receive authorization
for the Non-HSWA Federal BIF
requirements. In this action, the State is
not seeking authorization for the BIF
program (40 CFR 266.102 through 40
CFR 266.111). Although, the State did
not adopt these Federal provisions, it
did adopt the Non-HSWA Federal
permit modification provisions (40 CFR
270.42(g) and 40 CFR 270.42(j)) related
to boilers and industrial furnaces (WAC
173–303–830(4)(g) and WAC 173–303–
830(4)(j)).
5. Renumbering of Corrective Action
Requirements
In addition to authorizing the State’s
corrective action management unit
(CAMU) amendments, as identified in
Table 1, Section G above, the State
regulations for corrective action that
were located at WAC 173–303–646 have
been renumbered and restructured into
eleven new sections. See table at WAC
173–303–646 for cross-references
between new and previous State
corrective action citations.
I. Who Handles Permits After This
Authorization Takes Effect?
After authorization, Washington will
issue permits for all the provisions for
which it is authorized and will
administer the permits it issues. EPA
will continue to administer any RCRA
hazardous waste permits or portions of
permits that were issued prior to the
effective date of this authorization. EPA
will not issue any new permits or new
portions of permits for the provisions
listed in Section G after the effective
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63261
date of this authorization. EPA will
continue to implement and issue
permits for HSWA requirements for
which Washington is not yet authorized.
J. How Does Today’s Action Affect
Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Washington?
EPA’s decision to authorize the
Washington hazardous waste program
does not include any land that is, or
becomes after the date of this
authorization, ‘‘Indian Country,’’ as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151, with the
exception of the non-trust lands within
the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup
Indian Reservation (also referred to as
the ‘‘1873 Survey Area’’ or ‘‘Survey
Area’’) located in Tacoma, Washington.
EPA retains jurisdiction over ‘‘Indian
Country’’. Effective October 22, 1998 (63
FR 50531, 9/22/98) Washington’s State
program was authorized to implement
the State authorized program on the
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation. The authorization did not
extend to trust lands within the
reservation. EPA retains its authority to
implement RCRA on trust lands and
over Indians and Indian activities
within the 1873 Survey Area.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA
Codifying Washington’s Hazardous
Waste Program as Authorized in This
Rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
WW, for this authorization of
Washington’s program revisions until a
later date.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This rule authorizes revisions to the
State of Washington’s authorized
hazardous waste program pursuant to
section 3006 of RCRA and imposes no
requirements other than those currently
imposed by State law. This rule
complies with applicable executive
orders and statutory provisions as
follows.
1. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4,1993), the Agency
must determine whether the regulatory
action is ‘‘significant,’’ and therefore
subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
63262
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely affect in
a material way, the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. It has been determined that this
final rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under the terms of Executive
Order 12866 and is therefore not subject
to OMB review.
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because this
final rule does not establish or modify
any information or recordkeeping
requirements for the regulated
community and only seeks to authorize
the pre-existing requirements under
State law and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose
or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing, and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
3. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
as amended by the Small Business
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
generally requires Federal agencies to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
of any rule subject to notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impacts of
today’s rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small
business, as codified in the Small
Business Size Regulations at 13 CFR
part 121; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. EPA has
determined that this action will not
have a significant impact on small
entities because the final rule will only
have the effect of authorizing preexisting requirements under State law.
After considering the economic impacts
of today’s rule, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any year. Before promulgating
an EPA rule for which a written
statement is needed, section 205 of the
UMRA generally requires EPA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
The provisions of section 205 do not
apply when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows EPA to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective
or least burdensome alternative if the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why the alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements. This rule
contains no Federal mandates (under
the regulatory provisions of Title II of
the UMRA) for State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
imposes no new enforceable duty on
any State, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Similarly, EPA has
also determined that this rule contains
no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
government entities. Thus, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 203 of the UMRA.
5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, 8/10/99),
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among
various levels of government.’’ This rule
does not have federalism implications.
It will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132.
This rule addresses the authorization of
pre-existing State rules. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.
6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR
22951, 11/9/00), requires EPA to
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 209 / Monday, October 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 applies to any
rule that: (1) Is determined to be
‘‘economically significant’’ as defined
under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to
believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory
action meets both criteria, the Agency
must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned
regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives considered by the
Agency. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866 and because the
Agency does not have reason to believe
the environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this action present a
disproportionate risk to children.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, 5/22/01) because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
9. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through the OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards. This
rule does not involve ‘‘technical
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Oct 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
standards’’ as defined by the NTTAA.
Therefore, EPA is not considering the
use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
10. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
To the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, and consistent with
the principles set forth in the report on
the National Performance Review, each
Federal agency must make achieving
environmental justice part of its mission
by identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health and
environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States and its
territories and possessions, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of
the Mariana Islands. Because this rule
addresses authorizing pre-existing State
rules and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law and there are no anticipated
significant adverse human health or
environmental effects, the rule is not
subject to Executive Order 12898.
11. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective on the December 29,
2006.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indians—lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63263
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: October 18, 2006.
Ronald A. Kreizenbeck,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. E6–18222 Filed 10–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
49 CFR Part 37
[Docket OST–2006–26035]
RIN 2105–AC86
Transportation for Individuals With
Disabilities; Adoption of New
Accessibility Standards
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department is amending
its Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) regulations to adopt, as its
regulatory standards, the new
Americans with Disabilities Act
Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)
recently issued by the Access Board,
including technical amendments the
Access Board subsequently made to the
new ADAAG. In adopting the new
ADAAG as its standards, the
Department is making minor
modifications to some of the Guidelines
and is providing further guidance
concerning its newly-adopted standards.
DATES: This rule is effective November
29, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert C. Ashby, Deputy Assistant
General Counsel for Regulation and
Enforcement, Department of
Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW.,
Room 10424, Washington, DC 20590.
(202) 366–9306 (voice); (202) 755–7687
(TDD), bob.ashby@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
ADA, the Access Board has the
responsibility of creating ‘‘guidelines’’
for the accessibility of buildings,
facilities, and vehicles subject to ADA
requirements (the Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility
Guidelines, or ADAAG). It is then the
responsibility of the Department of
Transportation and Department of
Justice to incorporate into their ADA
regulations accessibility ‘‘standards’’
consistent with the Access Board’s
minimum guidelines.
The Department met this obligation in
its 1991 ADA regulations through
verbatim incorporation of the original
ADAAG in Appendix A to part 37. The
Access Board issued a major revision to
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 209 (Monday, October 30, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63253-63263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL-8235-5]
Washington: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Washington has applied to EPA for Final authorization of
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, as amended, (RCRA). EPA has determined that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for Final
authorization, and is authorizing the State's changes through this
immediate final rule. EPA is publishing this rule to authorize the
changes without a prior proposal because we believe this action is not
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on December 29,
2006, unless EPA receives adverse written comments on or before
November 29, 2006. If we receive comments that oppose this action, EPA
will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule
before it takes effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R10-RCRA-2006-0810
by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: kocourek.nina@epamail.epa.gov.
3. Fax: 206-553-8509.
4. Mail: Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA, Region 10, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail Stop AWT-122, Seattle, Washington
98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to EPA-10-RCRA-2006-0810. EPA's
policy is that all comments received will be included in the public
file without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-
mail. The https://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system which means that EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public file
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business
hours at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Library,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98101, phone, and (206) 553-
1289. The EPA Region 10 Library is open from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and from
1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nina Kocourek, U.S. EPA, Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail Stop AWT-122,
Seattle, Washington 98101, phone number (206) 553-6502, fax number
(206) 553-8509, e-mail: kocourek.nina@epa.gov; or Patricia Hervieux,
Washington Department of Ecology, 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, Washington
98503, phone (360) 407-6756, e-mail: pher461@ecy.wa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authorization of Revisions to State Program and of State-Initiated
Changes to Washington's Hazardous Waste Program
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States that have received final authorization from EPA pursuant to
section 3006(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes.
Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other
changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs because
of changes to EPA's regulations in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
[[Page 63254]]
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We conclude that Washington's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, with respect to these revisions, we are
granting Washington final authorization to operate its hazardous waste
program as described in the revision authorization application.
Washington's authorized program will be responsible for carrying out
the aspects of the RCRA program as described in its revised program
application, subject to the limitations of RCRA, including the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New Federal
requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal regulations that EPA
promulgates under the authority of HSWA take effect in authorized
States before they are authorized for the requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement those HSWA requirements and prohibitions for which Washington
has not been authorized, including issuing HSWA permits, until the
State is granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This Authorization Decision?
The effect of this authorization decision is that a facility in
Washington subject to RCRA will continue to be subject to the
authorized State requirements and to the Federal HSWA provisions for
which the State is not authorized in order to comply with RCRA.
Washington has enforcement responsibilities under its State hazardous
waste program for violations of its program, but EPA retains its
independent enforcement authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013,
and 7003, which authority includes, among other things, the authority
to:
Perform inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits;
and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether Washington
has taken its own actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Washington is
being authorized by this action are already effective under State law,
and are not changed by this action.
D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before this rule because we view
this as a routine program change and do not expect comments that oppose
this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public comment now.
In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register, we are publishing a separate document that proposes to
authorize Washington's program changes. If we receive comments, which
oppose this authorization, that document will serve as a proposal to
authorize these changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If we receive comments that oppose this action, EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule before it takes
effect. EPA will then address public comments in a later final rule
based on the proposed rule in this Federal Register. If we receive
comments that oppose only the authorization of a particular change to
the State hazardous waste program, we will withdraw that part of this
rule. However, the authorization of program changes that are not
opposed by any comments will become effective on December 29, 2006. A
Federal Register withdrawal document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective and which part is being withdrawn.
You may not have another opportunity to comment. If you want to comment
on this authorization, you must do so at this time.
F. What Has Washington Previously Been Authorized for?
Washington initially received final authorization on January 30,
1986, effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3782), to implement the State's
dangerous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to Washington's program on September 22, 1987, effective on
November 23, 1987 (52 FR 35556); August 17, 1990, effective October 16,
1990 (55 FR 33695); November 4, 1994, effective November 4, 1994 (59 FR
55322); February 29, 1996, effective April 29, 1996 (61 FR 7736);
September 22, 1998, effective October 22, 1998 (63 FR 50531); October
12, 1999, effective January 11, 2000 (64 FR 55142); April 11, 2002,
effective April 11, 2002 (67 FR 17636) and on April 14, 2006, effective
June 13, 2006 (71 FR 19442).
G. What Revisions Are We Authorizing With This Action?
We are granting final authorization for the revisions to
Washington's federally-authorized program described in Washington's
final complete program revision application submitted to EPA on June
26, 2006, and deemed complete by EPA on July 25, 2006. We have made a
final determination, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose
this action, that Washington's hazardous waste program revisions, as
described in this rule, satisfy the requirements necessary for final
authorization. Regulatory revisions that are less stringent than the
Federal program requirements and those regulatory revisions that are
broader in scope than the Federal program requirements are not
authorized. Washington's authorized hazardous waste program, as amended
by these provisions, remains equivalent to, consistent with, and is no
less stringent than the Federal RCRA program. Therefore, we grant final
authorization for the following program changes as identified in Table
1 and Table 2 below.
The provisions listed in these tables are from the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) and are analogous to the RCRA regulations as
indicated in the tables. The RCRA regulations are those as published in
40 CFR parts 260 through 265, 268, 270, and 279, as of July 1, 2003,
unless otherwise noted. Table 1 identifies new State rules that EPA is
authorizing as equivalent or more stringent to the Federal program, and
Table 2 identifies those State-initiated changes to its previously-
authorized program. (Note, in Table 2 some State provisions have no
direct Federal analog but are related to particular paragraphs,
sections, or parts of the Federal hazardous waste requirements in the
40 CFR). All of the referenced analogous State authorities were legally
adopted and effective as of January 1, 2005.
Table 1.--Equivalent and More Stringent Analogues to the Federal Program \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analogous state authority
Checklist \4\ Federal requirements Federal Register (WAC 173-303-* * *)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17D \3\............................ Waste Minimization 50 FR 28702, 7/15/85.. 180(1); 370(1); 380(1);
HSWA Codification 390(1); 380(1)(q);
Rule. 810(11)(c); 805(1)(b),
805(1)(c).
[[Page 63255]]
30................................. Biennial Report 51 FR 28556, 8/8/86... 390(2)(g), 390(2)(h),
Correction. 390(2)(i).
108................................ Toxicity 57 FR 30657, 7/10/92.. 071(3)(aa); 071(3)(g)(i);
Characteristic 400(3)(a) Incorporated by
Revisions; Technical Reference (IBR) 045(1)
Corrections.
152................................ Imports and Exports of 61 FR 16290, 4/12/96.. 120(6); 170(6); 070(1);
Hazardous Waste: 230(2); 280(1), 280(2);
Implementation of 600(3)(f); 950; 960;
OECD Council Decision. 230(1) IBR 045(1);
240(11); 250(1);
290(1)(a), 290(1)(b);
370(6); 525(1)(b)(ii),
525(1)(b)(iii); 573(16);
573(27), 573(34), 573(38),
573(38)(d).
156 \3\............................ Military Munitions 62 FR 6622, 2/12/97... 578(3); 578(4)(d),
Rule. 578(4)(d)(i),
578(4)(d)(ii), 578(4)(e).
159................................ Conformance With the 62 FR 32974, 6/17/97.. 9904; 082(1); 9903; 082(4)
Carbamate Vacatur. IBR 045(1); 9905;
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
161................................ Emergency Revision of 62 FR 45568, 8/28/97.. 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
the Carbamate Land
Disposal Restrictions
(LDR).
168................................ Hazardous Waste 63 FR 33782, 6/19/98.. 830(4)(j), 830(4)(j)(i),
Combustors; Revised 830(4)(j)(ii), 830
Standards. Appendix I--L. 9.;
805(7)(b)(viii).
182................................ Hazardous Air 64 FR 52828, 9/30/99 040; 670(1)(b),
Pollutants Standards amended at 64 FR 670(1)(b)(i),
for Combustors. 63209, 11/19/99. 670(1)(b)(ii), 670(1)(c),
670(1)(d); 680(2);
400(3)(a) IBR 045(1);
510(1)(a) IBR 045(1);
806(4)(f), 806(4)(f)(v),
806(4)(n); 830 Appendix I--
A.8 and I.9.; 807 Intro.;
811 IBR 045(1).
183................................ LDR Phase IV-- 64 FR 56469, 10/20/99. 9904; 082(1); 200(1)(f);
Technical Correction. 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
184 \2\............................ Accumulation Time for 65 FR 12378, 3/8/00... 200(1)(e), 200(1)(f);
Waste Water Treatment 200(4)(a), 200(4)(a)(i),
Sludges. 200(4)(a)(ii),
200(4)(a)(iii),
200(4)(a)(iv),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(I),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(II),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(III),
200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(III) 1st
and 2nd Bullets,
200(4)(a)(iv)(B),
200(4)(a)(iv)(C),
200(4)(a)(v)(D),
200(4)(a)(iv)(E),
200(4)(b), 200(4)(c).
187................................ Petroleum Refining 64 FR 36365, 6/8/00... 9904; 140(2) IBR 045(1).
Process Wastes--
Clarification.
188................................ Hazardous Air 65 FR 42292, 7/10/00.. 670(1)(b)(i),
Pollutant Standards; 670(1)(b)(iii);
Technical Corrections. 830(4)(j)(i).
189................................ Chlorinated Aliphatics 65 FR 67068, 11/8/00.. 9904; 082(1); 082(4) IBR
Listing and LDR for 045(1); 9905; 140(2)(a)
Newly Identified IBR 045(1).
Wastes.
192A \2\........................... Mixture and Derived-- 66 FR 27266, 5/16/01.. 070(2)(a), 070(2)(c)(i),
From Rules Revisions. 070(2)(c)(ii),
070(2)(c)(ii)(A),
070(2)(c)(ii)(B); 071(2),
071(3)(bb), 071(3)(o);
081(3); 082(3).
192B............................... LDR Correction........ 66 FR 27266, 5/16/01.. 140(2) IBR 045(1).
193................................ Change of Official EPA 66 FR 34374, 6/28/01.. 110(3)(a).
Mailing Address.
194 \2\............................ Mixture and Derived-- 66 FR 50332, 10/3/01.. 071(2); 081(3); and 082(3).
From Rules Revision
II.
195................................ Inorganic Chemical 66 FR 58258, 11/20/01; 071(3)(kk), 071(3)(kk)(i),
Manufacturing Wastes 67 FR 17119, 4/9/02. 071(3)(kk)(ii),
Identification and 071(3)(kk)(iii),
Listing. 071(3)(kk)(iv),
071(3)(kk)(v); 9904;
082(1), 082(4) IBR 045(1);
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
[[Page 63256]]
196................................ Corrective Action 67 FR 2962, 1/22/02... 040; 64650(1), 64650(2);
Management Unit 64640, 64640(1); 64650(3),
(CAMU) Amendments. 64650(3)(a),
64650(3)(a)(i),
64650(3)(a)(ii),
64650(3)(a)(ii)(A),
64650(3)(a)(ii)(B),
64650(3)(a)(iii),
64650(3)(b), 64650(3)(c),
64650(3)(c)(i),
64650(3)(c)(ii),
64650(3)(c)(iii),
64650(3)(c)(iv),
64650(3)(d), 64650(3)(e);
64670(1), 64670(1)(a),
64670(1)(b), 64670(2);
64660(1), 64660(1)(a),
64660(1)(b), 64660(1)(c),
64660(1)(d), 64660(1)(e),
64660(1)(f), 64660(1)(g),
64660(2), 64660(2)(a),
64660(2)(b), 64660(2)(c),
64660(3), 64660(3)(a),
64660(3)(b), 64660(3)(c),
64660(3)(c)(i),
64660(3)(c)(ii),
64660(3)(c)(ii)(A),
64660(3)(c)(ii)(B),
64660(3)(d),
64660(3)(d)(i),
64660(3)(d)(i)(A),
64660(3)(d)(i)(A)(I),
64660(3)(d)(i)(A)(II),
64660(3)(d)(i)(B),
64660(3)(d)(i)(C),
64660(3)(d)(ii),
64660(3)(d)(iii),
64660(3)(d)(iv),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(A),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(B),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(C),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(D),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(E),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(F),
64660(3)(d)(v),
64660(3)(d)(v)(A),
64660(3)(d)(v)(B),
64660(3)(d)(v)(C),
64660(3)(d)(v)(D),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(I),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(II),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(III),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(IV),
64660(3)(d)(v)(E)(V),
64660(3)(d)(vi),
64660(3)(d)(vii),
64660(3)(e),
64660(3)(e)(i),
64660(3)(e)(ii),
64660(3)(e)(iii),
64660(3)(f),
64660(3)(f)(iv),
64660(3)(f)(i),
64660(3)(f)(i)(A),
64660(3)(f)(i)(B),
64660(3)(f)(ii),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(A),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(B),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(C),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(D),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(E),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(F),
64660(3)(f)(iii),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(I),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(II),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(III),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(IV),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(A)(V),
64660(3)(f)(iii)(B),
64660(3)(f)(iv), 64660(4),
64660(4)(a), 64660(4)(b),
64660(4)(b)(i),
64660(4)(b)(ii), 64660(5),
64660(6), 64660(7),
64660(8); 64650(4); 64690
IBR 045(1); 646910(1),
646910(1)(a),
646910(1)(b),
646910(1)(b)(i),
646910(1)(b)(ii),
646910(1)(b)(iii),
646910(1)(c), 646910(2),
646910(3), 646910(4),
646910(5), 646910(5)(a),
646910(5)(b),
646910(5)(c),
646910(5)(d),
646910(5)(e),
646910(5)(f), 646910(6),
646910(7).
197................................ Hazardous Air 67 FR 6792, 2/13/02... 670(1)(b)(i),
Pollutant Standards 670(1)(b)(iv),
for Combustors: 670(1)(b)(iv)(A),
Interim Standards. 670(1)(b)(iv)(B);
400(3)(a) IBR 045(1);
806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n);
807 Introduction; 811 IBR
045(1); 841 IBR 045(1).
198................................ Hazardous Air 67 FR 6968, 2/14/02... 510(1)(a) IBR 045(1);
Pollutant Standards 830(4)(j)(i).
for Combustors:
Corrections.
200................................ Zinc Fertilizer Rule.. 67 FR 48393, 7/24/02.. 071(3), 071(3)(pp),
071(3)(pp)(i),
071(3)(pp)(i)(A),
071(3)(pp)(i)(B),
071(3)(pp)(ii),
071(3)(pp)(iii),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(A),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(B),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(C),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(D),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(E),
071(3)(pp)(iii)(F);
505(1)(b)(i),
505(1)(b)(iii),
505(1)(b)(iii)(A),
505(1)(b)(iii)(B);
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
201................................ Treatment Variance for 67 FR 62618, 10/7/02.. 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1).
Radioactively
Contaminated
Batteries.
202................................ Hazardous Air 67 FR 77687, 12/19/02. 806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n);
Pollutant Standards 807 Introduction; 811 IBR
for Combustors: 045(1).
Corrections 2.
204 \2\, 204.1 \2\................. Performance Track and 69 FR 21737, 4/22/04 200(5) IBR 045(1),
Amendments. amended 69 FR 62217, 200(5)(a), 200(5)(b),
10/25/04. 200(5)(c), 200(5)(d),
200(5)(e).
[[Page 63257]]
209 \2\............................ Mercury Containing 70 FR 45508, 8/5/05... 040; 077(2), 077(3);
Equipment, Universal 600(3)(o)(ii),
Waste. 600(3)(o)(iii);
400(2)(c)(xi)(B),
400(2)(c)(xi)(C);
573(4)(d) IBR 045(1);
800(7)(c)(iii)(B),
800(7)(c)(iii)(C);
573(3)(a), 573(3)(b),
573(3)(b)(i),
573(3)(b)(ii),
573(3)(c)(i),
573(3)(c)(ii), 573(4)(a),
573(4)(b), 573(4)(b)(i),
573(4)(b)(ii),
573(4)(c)(i),
573(4)(c)(ii); 573(9)(b),
573(9)(b)(i),
573(9)(b)(ii),
573(9)(b)(ii)(A)-(H),
573(9)(b)(iii)(A),
573(9)(b)(iii)(A)(I),
573(9)(b)(iii) (9)(A)(II),
573(9)(b)(iii)(B),
573(9)(b)(iii)(C),
573(10)(b), 573(10)(c),
573(11)(c)(ii),
573(19)(b)(iv),
573(19)(b)(v), 573(20)(b),
573(20)(b)(i),
573(20)(b)(ii),
573(20)(b)(ii)(A)-(H),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A)(I),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A)(II),
573(20)(b)(iii)(B),
573(20)(b)(iii)(C),
573(21)(b), 573(21)(c),
573(22)(c)(ii),
573(26)(a)(ii),
573(26)(b)(ii),
573(37)(a)(ii).
13, 79 (Consolidated Checklist C2). Identification and 50 FR 614, 1/4/85; 120(4).
Listing of Hazardous amended 50 FR 14216,
Waste--Recycling 4/11/85 and 50 FR
Facility Requirements. 33541, 8/20/85; 55 FR
25454, 6/21/90.
IVA, IVB, 34, 64, 78, 102 Standards for Owners 45 FR 33232, 5/19/80; 300(1), 300(2); 040.
(Consolidated Checklist C5/C6). and Operators of 51 FR 40572, 11/7/86
Hazardous Waste amended 52 FR 21010,
Treatment Storage and 6/4/87; 54 FR 33376,
Disposal Facilities-- 8/14/89; 55 FR 22520,
Waste Analysis Plan. 6/1/90; 57 FR 8086, 3/
6/92.
V, 13, 71 (Consolidated Checklist Permits by Rule-- 48 FR 14228, 4/12/83, 802(5)(a), 802(5)(b); 040.
C9 \2\). Subpart F--Special amended 48 FR 30113,
Forms of Permits. 6/30/83; 50 FR 614, 1/
4/85; amended 50 FR
14216, 4/11/85 and 50
FR 33541, 8/20/85; 55
FR 2322, 1/23/90.
54, 85, 94, 168, 188, 198 Hazardous Waste 53 FR 37912, 9/28/88 830(4)(g), 830(4)(g)(i),
(Consolidated Checklist C9). Management amended 53 FR 41649, 830(4)(g)(i)(A),
Facilities--Boilers 10/24/88; 56 FR 7134, 830(4)(g)(i)(B),
and Industrial 2/21/91; 56 FR 32688, 830(4)(g)(i)(C),
Furnaces. 7/17/91; 63 FR 33782, 830(4)(g)(i)(D),
6/19/98; 65 FR 42292, 830(4)(g)(i)(E),
7/10/00; amended 66 830(4)(j), 830(4)(j)(i),
FR 24270, 5/14/01 and 830(4)(j)(ii).
66 FR 35087, 7/3/01;
67 FR 6968, 2/14/02.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For further discussion on where the revised State rules differ from the Federal rules refer to Section G.
below, the authorization revision application, and the administrative record for this decision.
\2\ State rule contains some more stringent provisions. For identification of more stringent State provisions
refer to the authorization revision application and the administrative record for this decision.
\3\ State requested authorization for portions of the Federal regulation. For identification of which portions
are authorized refer to the authorization revision application and the administrative record for this
decision.
\4\ Checklists generally reflect changes made to the Federal regulations pursuant to a particular Federal
Register notice and EPA publishes these Checklists as aids for States to use for the development of their
authorization application. (See EPA's RCRA State Authorization Web page at https://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/
hazwaste/state/rcra.)
Table 2.--State Initiated Changes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement and reason for change Analogous Federal 40 CFR
(WAC 173-303-* * *) citation\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 ``Partial closure'' definition, 260.10.
Internal citation corrected.
045(1), Date of incorporation by No direct federal analog.
reference updated.
045(2)(a) Federal citation for a 260.20-260.22.
delegable provision moved to next sub-
subsection.
045(2)(b), Citation corrected.......... 264.301(l).
045(2)(c), Citation corrected.......... 268.5, 268.6, 268.10-14,
268.42(b), 268.44 except
268.44(a)-(g).
045(3), Clarification of delegable 260.20-22.
federal citation not incorporated by
reference.
045(4), New subsection--substitution of No direct federal analog.
state for federal terms.
060(1), Clarification of ID 262.12(a)&(c).
issuance and state-only transfer
facility registration number issuance.
060(2), Corrections for new form name.. 262.12(b).
060(5), Corrections for new form name.. 262.12 related.
070(2)(c), Hazardous debris exclusion 261.3(f).
moved to 071(3)(qq).
070(7)(c)(ii), Citation added.......... 261.5(c) and 262.10 related.
070(8)(b)(iii)(C), Citation updated.... 261.5(f)(3) & 261.5(g)(3)
related.
070(8)(d), Clarification of application 261.6(a)(4).
of used oil standards to CESQGs.
071(3)(k), Citation corrected.......... No direct federal analog.
[[Page 63258]]
071(3)(o), SIC changed to NAIC Codes... 261.3(c)(2)(ii)(A).
071(3)(cc), SIC changed to NAIC Codes.. 261.4(a)(12).
071(3)(hh), SIC changed to NAIC Codes.. 261.4(a)(18).
071(3)(nn), State-only drug exclusion.. No direct federal analog.
081(3), Clarification of ``mixture'' 261.3(c).
language.
082(3), Clarification of ``mixture'' 261.3(b)(2).
language.
090(5)(a)(iii), Citation deletion to 261.21.
conform to federal rule.
100(5)(b)(i), Clarification............ No direct federal analog.
100(6), Publication reference update... No direct federal analog.
100(6)(d), Obsolete reference deleted.. No direct federal analog.
104, State-only waste codes identified No direct federal analog.
in one location.
110(3)(g)(vii), Spelling correction and 260.11(a)(15).
year update.
120(3)................................. 261.6(a)(2).
120(4)................................. 261.6(c)(1).
120(4)(c)(v)-(viii).................... 261.6(c)(2).
Closure requirements for recycling and
used oil facilities (new in 2005).
140(2)(a), Citation added Clarification Part 268.
161(6), 5 years added as retention No direct federal analog.
period for labpacks.
170(5), Citations corrected............ 262.10(i).
190(5)(b), Marking directions corrected No direct federal analog 262.30-
260.33 related.
200(1)(b)(i)&(ii), Citation corrected.. 262.34(a)(1) intro and
(a)(1)(i) & (ii).
200(1)(b)(ii)&(iii), Stress of 262.34(a)(1) intro and
installation added for equivalence (a)(1)(ii) & (iii).
with federal rule.
200(1)(b)(iv)(B), Citation added for 262.34(a)(1)(iv) paragraph
equivalence with federal rule at un- following (B).
numbered paragraph following (B).
200(1)(e)(i), Citation added for 262.34(a)(4).
equivalence with federal rule.
201(2)(e), Citations corrected; 262.34(d).
generators of between 220 and 2200
pounds are subject to secondary
containment.
210(2), Corrections for new form name.. 262.40(b).
240(6)(a), Corrections for new form 263.12 related.
name.
283(2), Citation corrected............. No direct federal analog.
290(1)(a)(i) through (vi), Subsection 264/265.12(a).
renumbered.
320(2)(a), Edit for clarity............ 264/265.15 except (b)(4)&(d).
380(1)(i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), 264.73(b)(8), (9), (10), (11),
(o), Citations corrected. (12), (13), (14), (15), and
(16).
380(1)(p), Reference added............. 264.73(b)(17).
390(1), Deleted obsolete form title.... 264/265 Intro.
395(1)(d), Uniform Fire Code changed to 264/265.17.
International Fire Code.
400(3)(c)(ix), Closure notification 265.112(d)(1) related.
clarified.
400(3)(c)(xi)(C) & (G), Citations 265 related.
corrected.
500(1), Reference to 120(3) & (5) added No federal analog.
505(1) Intro, Reference to 120(3) added No direct federal analog.
505(1)(b), State fertilizer No direct federal analog.
registration requirements moved from
(1)(b)(i) to (1)(b)(iv).
506(1), Reference to 120(3) added...... 261.4(b)(12).
510(1), Reference to 120(3) added...... 266.30(a) (1990 CFR).
510(1)(b)(i)(B) and Note, 266.30(b) intro and (b)(1)
Clarification; Previous (C) deleted (1990 CFR) 266.100(b)(1) (1999
and consolidated into (B) References CFR).
to state-only W001 removed.
515(5)(a), State waste code W001 279.12.
changed to WPCB.
515(9)(a), Closure requirements for 279.52 related.
recycling and used oil facilities (new
in 2005).
515(13), Used oil testing (new 279 related.
subsection).
520 Intro, Reference to 120(3) added... 266.80(a).
522(1), Reference to 120(3) added...... No federal analog.
525(1), Reference to 120(3) added...... 266.70 except 266.70(v)(3).
600(3)(e), Citation correction......... 270.1(c)(2) 264.1(b).
600(3)(g), Citation correction......... 270.1(c)(2) 264.1(b).
610(1)(c), (previous ``c'' became ``d'' 264.110 related.
& ``d'' became ``e'') Closure
requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
610(2)(b)(i), Closure standard wording 264.111(c).
corrected.
610(3)(c)(i), Closure notification 264.112(d).
clarified.
610(12) New subsection, Closure 264.112 related.
requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(1)(e) New sub-subsection, Closure 264.140 related.
requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(2)(a), Closure requirements for 264.141(a)-(e) related.
recycling and used oil facilities (new
in 2005); Closure plan definition
modified to include recycling and used
oil processors.
620(3), New un-numbered exception 264.142 related.
paragraph, Closure requirements for
recycling and used oil facilities (new
in 2005).
620(4)(a), Reference to used oil and 264.143 related.
recycling facilities added, Closure
requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(4)(b), Clarification............... 264.143.
[[Page 63259]]
620(4)(c), New sub-subsection, Closure No direct federal analog.
requirements for recycling and used
oil facilities (new in 2005).
620(6)(a)(i), Partially funded trust 264.145.
funds no longer allowed for closure.
620(6)(a)(v), Minimum ratings of 264.145.
financial strength for financial and
insurance institutions required.
620(6)(a)(vi), Minimum tangible net 264.145.
worth increased to $20M.
620(8)(a), Closure requirements for 264.147(a).
recycling and used oil facilities (new
in 2005); Liability requirements
modified to apply to recyclers and
used oil processors.
620(8)(a)(i), Minimum ratings of 264.147(a).
financial strength for financial and
insurance institutions required.
620(8)(a)(ii), Allow Ecology to file 264.147(a).
claims against liability insurance.
620(8)(a)(iii), Minimum tangible net 264.147(a).
worth increased to $20M.
620(8)(b)&(f), Citations corrected..... 264.147(b), 264.147(f)-(j).
630(8)(a) and (b), Uniform Fire Code 264.176.
references changed to International
Fire Code.
640(2)(c)(iv)(B) Note, Reference to 264.191(b)(5)(ii), Note.
obsolete guidance replaced with list
of publications that may be used.
640(4)(i), Citations corrected......... 264.193.
640(4)(i)(iii) Note, Reference to 264.193.
obsolete guidance replaced with list
of publications that may be used.
640(7)(d)(i)-(iii), (ii) and (iii) 264.196.
deleted; Spill requirements modified--
must be reported immediately.
640(7)(d)(i)(F), Section 360 applies in 264.196.
the event of emergency.
645(1)(a)(ii), Citations corrected..... 264.90(a).
645(10)(h) Lettering corrected, (h) was 264.99.
added as a reserved sub-subsection
since it had been missing from
previous text. No text is missing. Two
federal provisions (g) and (h) are
combined at (g) in the State rules.
64690 (previous 646(8)), Clarification 264.554.
that ``director'' means ``department''.
670(1)(c)(i)-(ii)...................... 264.340(b) & (c).
670(1)(c)(iii)......................... 264.340 related.
670(1)(d).............................. 264.340(d).
Re-lettered from (b) to (c) and (c) to
(d) to accommodated new (b).
680(3), Citation corrected............. 264.602.
690(1)(c), Citation clarified.......... 264.1030(c).
691(1)(b) Intro, Citation clarified.... 264.1050(b) intro.
691(1)(c), Paragraph updated........... 264.1050(c).
692(2) Note, Citations corrected....... 264.1081-1091.
802(3), Citation corrected............. 270.60(b).
802(4)(c)(viii), Citation corrected.... 270.60(c).
803(3)(c), SIC changed to NAIC Codes... 270.13.
805(7)(a)(v), Citation correction...... 270.72(a)(5).
806(6), Note added..................... 270.10(h).
830 Appendix I--6. and 7.a. & b., 270.42 Appendix I.
Citations corrected.
830 Appendix I--N.1. and 2., Citations 270.42 Appendix I.
corrected.
910(1)(c), Minimum public comment 260.20(c).
period reduced from 45 to 21 days.
910(6)(f)(i), Minimum public comment 268 related.
period reduced from 45 to 21 days.
960, Changed to be consistent with RCRA 7003 related.
Hazardous Waste Management Act.
9904 State sources, State PCB waste 261.31(a), 261.32.
code changed from W001 to WPCB.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Reference to ``No direct federal analog'' is for informational
purposes and is not authorized.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal Rules?
Under RCRA 3009, EPA may not authorize State rules that are less
stringent than the Federal program. Any State rules that are less
stringent do not supplant the Federal regulations. State rules that are
broader in scope than the Federal program requirements are allowed but
are not authorized. State rules that are equivalent to, and State rules
that are more stringent than, the Federal program may be authorized, in
which case they are enforceable by EPA.
This section discusses certain rules where EPA has made the finding
that the State program is more stringent and will be authorized; it
discusses those State rules which are being authorized as different but
equivalent to the Federal program; it discusses those rules where the
State program is broader in scope, and cannot be authorized. Certain
portions of the Federal program are not delegable to the States because
of the Federal government's special role in foreign policy matters and
because of national concerns that arise with certain decisions. EPA
does not delegate import/export functions. Under RCRA regulations found
in 40 CFR part 262, EPA will continue to implement requirements for
import/export functions. The State amended its import and export rules
to include 40 CFR part 262, subpart H in accordance with the
[[Page 63260]]
Federal rule on Imports and Exports Regulations of Hazardous Waste:
Implementation of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) Council Decision (61 FR 16290, 4/12/96). The State's counterpart
to this Federal rule is found at WAC 173-303-120(6), although EPA will
continue to implement those requirements. Not all program differences
are discussed in this section because Washington writes its own version
of the Federal hazardous waste rules. Persons must consult Tables 1 and
2, in Section G above, for the specific State regulations that EPA is
authorizing in this final rule.
1. More Stringent
States are allowed to seek authorization for State requirements
that are more stringent than Federal requirements. EPA has authority to
authorize and enforce those parts of a State's program EPA finds to be
more stringent than the Federal program. This section does not discuss
each more stringent finding made by EPA, but persons can locate such
sections by consulting Table 1 in Section G above, as well as by
reviewing the docket for this rule. The State program is authorized for
each more stringent requirement as part of this rulemaking.
The State revised its previously-authorized permits-by-rule
provision at WAC-173-303-802(5)(a) and (5)(b) to allow off-site
dangerous waste, including federally-regulated waste, to be received at
a wastewater treatment unit. These State provisions are considered
broader in scope for State-only wastes and more stringent for the
federally-regulated wastes since the State rule includes additional
safeguards that the Federal requirements found at 40 CFR 270.1(c)(2(iv)
and (v) do not include, such as: (1) Requirement that the source of the
wastewater be identified; (2) requirement that the generator keep an
operating record when federally-regulated wastes are received from off-
site, and (3) requirement that wastewater received from off-site be
generated within the same industry and be able to be effectively
treated by the wastewater treatment unit.
The State adopted portions of the Federal Mercury-Containing
Equipment, Universal Waste Rule (70 FR 45508, 8/5/05). The State's rule
is based on EPA's proposed rule (67 FR 40508, 6/12/02) and until the
State revises its rules to include the changes EPA made with its final
rule (70 FR 45508, 8/5/05) the State's program will be more stringent
than the Federal program. The State's rule is more stringent because it
does not include the following Federal provisions: the definition for
``ampule'' (40 CFR 260.10); merging ``mercury-containing thermostats''
with ``mercury-containing equipment'' into one universal waste category
(40 CFR 260.10); and revised waste management standards for mercury-
containing equipment that have open housings instead of ampules (40 CFR
273.13). Additionally, the State's definitions of small and large
quantity handler of universal waste found at WAC 173-303-040 are more
stringent than the Federal rule (40 CFR 273.9) because (1) the State's
rule regulates universal waste lamps at a lower accumulation threshold
than the Federal requirement and (2) the State's rule does not include
the Federal language that allows equipment with non-contained elemental
mercury to be managed as universal waste.
The State incorporated by reference most of the Federal Performance
Track Rule (69 FR 21737, 4/22/04) into State law (WAC 173-303-200(5)).
However, there are some Federal provisions for which the State included
its own internal citations, which include the following more stringent
requirements: aisle space requirement for containers (WAC 173-303-
630(5)(c)); risk labeling (WAC 173-303-200(1)(d)); verification of
training (WAC 173-303-300(2)(c)); cause of incident (WAC 173-303-
360(2)(k)(viii)); and description of corrective action taken to prevent
reoccurrence of the incident (WAC-173-303-360(2)(k)(ix)); and the
requirement that drip pads remain subject to closure standards (WAC
173-303-675(6)(b)).
We also consider the State's new requirement for accumulating
dangerous waste on-site for waste water treatment sludges (WAC 173-303-
200(1)(e) and (f)) to be more stringent than the Federal requirement
(40 CFR 262.34(a)(4)) because the State rule-unlike the Federal rule-
requires compliance with ``general inspections'' (WAC 173-303-320) in
addition to the other Federal requirements.
The State's revised mixture rules (WAC 173-303-071(2); 081(3); and
082(3)) are more stringent than the Federal rules because the State
rules do not include all of the Federal wastewater mixture exclusions
as identified in the Federal Mixture and Derived-From Rule Revisions
(66 FR 27266, 516/01; and 66 FR 50332, 10/3/01).
2. Different But Equivalent
The following State requirements are different than the Federal
requirements, but EPA has determined that they are nevertheless
equivalent to the Federal program.
In 2005, the State enacted its Hazardous Waste Facilities
Initiative (HWFI), which among other things makes many recycling
activities subject to closure plan requirements, pollution liability
coverage requirements, and financial assurance requirements. In
contrast, under the Federal rules, hazardous waste recycling activities
are generally exempt from hazardous waste requirements and therefore
are not subject to closure plans, pollution liability coverage and
financial assurance. Additionally, the State amended its previously
authorized provision (WAC 173-303-120(4)) to be more similar to the
Federal rule (40 CFR 261.6(c)(2)) in that the State removed the
provision that specified that recyclable materials would be considered
stored unless they were moved into an active recycling process within
24 hours The State revised its rule so that it can determine on a case-
by-case basis whether recyclable materials received from off-site are
not stored if they are moved into an active recycling process in a
period of time not to exceed 72 hours. While the Federal analog does
not specify a timeframe after which holding recyclable materials is
considered storage, EPA Region 1 authorized the State of Vermont for a
similar provision (see 64 FR 51702, September 24, 1999), stating ``EPA
has previously agreed that States administering the RCRA program have
some discretion to determine that short periods of accumulation by
recyclers of incoming material do not constitute storage and would not
trigger the RCRA storage permitting requirements''. Region 1 determined
that Vermont's rule, which allows up to three days without a storage
permit, was equivalent to the Federal program and therefore federally
approvable. Based on the Vermont authorization and based on the fact
that Washington's comprehensive recycling program approach will result
in significantly better environmental performance by affected
facilities, EPA has determined Washington's rule to be equivalent to
the Federal program and federally approvable.
The State revised its previously-authorized waste analysis plan
requirements at WAC 173-303-300(1) and (2). The State amended its rule
to provide clarity for Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD)
facilities. The State rule is worded differently than the Federal rule
at 40 CFR 264.13(a)(1) and (2); however, we consider it to be
equivalent to the Federal program. While the Federal rule states that a
TSD facility must obtain a detailed chemical
[[Page 63261]]
and physical analysis of a representative sample of the waste, 40 CFR
264.13(2) states that the analysis may include data developed under 40
CFR part 261 and existing published or documented data on the hazardous
waste or on hazardous waste generated from similar processes. Federal
guidance allows the use of knowledge rather than direct testing under
certain circumstances (Waste Analysis at Facilities That Generate,
Treat, Store, and Dispose of Hazardous Waste--A Guidance Manual OSWER
9938.4-03, April 1994). Therefore, the State amended its rule to
require documentation when a TSD facility relies upon such knowledge
other than testing. The State rule clarifies when the use of knowledge,
as defined in WAC 173-303-040, is acceptable, and requires
documentation to ensure that such knowledge is sufficient and used
appropriately. Overall, EPA believes that the State rule ensures that
wastes will be properly designated and managed in a safe and protective
manner, and therefore we have determined that the State rule is
equivalent to the Federal program.
3. Broader in Scope
States are not allowed to seek authorization for State requirements
that are broader in scope than Federal requirements