FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting, 63007-63010 [E6-18036]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 208 / Friday, October 27, 2006 / Notices
technologies could reduce energy usage
at the facility.
EIS No. 20060120, ERP No. FB–FTA–
L40210–WA, Central Link Light Rail
Transit Project (Sound Transit)
Construction and Operation of the
North Link Light Rail Extension, from
Downtown Seattle and Northgate,
Updated Information on Refined
Design Concepts, Funding, Right-ofWay and U.S. Army COE Section 404
Permits, King County, WA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the lead agency.
EIS No. 20060370, ERP No. FS–AFS–
F65039–WI, McCaslin Project,
Vegetation Management Activities
that are Consistent with Direction in
the Nicolet Forest Plan, New
Information to Address Inadequate
Disclosure of the Cumulative Effect
Analysis for Six Animal and Eight
Plant Species, Lakewood/Lasna
District, Chequamegaon-Nicolet
National Forest, Oconto and Forest
Counties, WI.
Summary: EPA’s concerns about the
cumulative impact analysis have been
resolved; therefore, EPA does not object
to the proposed project.
Dated: October 24, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6–18019 Filed 10–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6680–5]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 10/16/2006 Through 10/20/2006
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20060435, Final EIS, COE, AZ,
Rio Salado Oeste Project, Ecosystem
Restoration along the Salt River, City
of Phoenix, Maricopa County, AZ,
Wait Period Ends: 11/27/2006,
Contact: Scott K. Estergard 602–640–
2003.
EIS No. 20060436, Draft Supplement,
FHW, IN, US–31 Kokomo Corridor
Project, Updated Information on
Alternative J, Transportation
Improvement between IN–26 and U.S.
35 Northern Junction, City of Kokomo
and Center Township, Howard and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
Tipton Counties, IN, Comment Period
Ends: 12/11/2006, Contact: Larry Heil
317–226–7480.
EIS No. 20060437, Draft EIS, NRS, WV,
Dunloup Creek Watershed Plan,
Voluntary Floodplain Buyout,
Implementation, West Virginia Third
Congressional District, Fayette and
Raleigh Counties, WV, Comment
Period Ends: 12/11/2006, Contact:
Ronald Hilliard 304–284–7540.
EIS No. 20060438, Draft EIS, VAD/DON,
CA, Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery
Annex, Construction and Operation,
Located at Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Miramar, Point Loma, San
Diego County, CA, Comment Period
Ends: 12/11/2006, Contact: Hiphil
Clemente 619–532–3781.
EIS No. 20060439, Final Supplement,
AFS, CA, Rock Creek Recreational
Trails Project, Updated Information
on Habitat Status and Population
Trend for the Pacific Deer Herd,
Implementation, Eldorado National
Forest, Eldorado County, CA, Wait
Period Ends: 11/27/2006, Contact:
Laura Hierholzer 530–642–5187.
EIS No. 20060440, Draft EIS, GSA, VA,
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Central Records Complex, Site
Selection and Construction,
Winchester, Frederick County, VA,
Comment Period Ends: 12/11/2006,
Contact: Katrina Scarpato 215–446–
4651.
EIS No. 20060441, Final EIS, CGD, MA,
Northeast Gateway Deepwater Port
License Application to Import
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) (USCG–
2005–22219), Massachusetts Bay, City
of Gloucester, MA, Wait Period Ends:
11/27/2006, Contact: Roddy Bachman
202–372–1451.
EIS No. 20060442, Final EIS, BLM, ID,
Coeur d’Alene Resource Management
Plan, Implementation, Benewah,
Bonner, Boundary, Kootenai and
Shoshone Counties, ID, Wait Period
Ends: 11/27/2006, Contact: Scott
Pavey 208–769–5059.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20060348, Draft EIS, NPS, MN,
Disposition of Bureau of Mines
Property, Twin Cities Research Center
Main Campus, Implementation,
Hennepin County, MN, Comment
Period Ends: 11/24/2006, Contact:
Kim M. Berns 651–290–3030–x244.
Revision of FR Notice Published 08/
18/2006: Extend Comment Period
from 10/16/2006 to 11/24/2006.
EIS No. 20060360, Draft EIS, AFS, WA,
Gifford-Pinchot National Forest and
Columbia River Gorge National Scenic
Area (Washington Portion) SiteSpecific Invasive Plant Treatment
Project, Implementation, Skamania,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63007
Cowlitz, Lewis, Clark, Klickitat
Counties, WA, Comment Period Ends:
11/22/2006, Contact: Carol A.
Chandler 541–360–5100. Revision of
FR Notice Published 09/01/2006:
Extending Comment Period from 10/
16/2006 to 11/22/2006.
EIS No. 20060376, Draft EIS, FHW, AK,
Knik Arm Crossing Project, To
Provide Improved Access between the
Municipality of Anchorage and
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK,
Comment Period Ends: 11/17/2006,
Contact: Ms. Edrie Vinson 907–586–
7464. Revision of FR Notice Published
09/15/2006: Extend Comment from
10/30/2006 to 11/17/2006.
Dated: October 24, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6–18018 Filed 10–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0856; FRL–8099–8]
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel;
Notice of Public Meeting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: There will be a 4–day meeting
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory
Panel FIFRA SAP to consider and
review Worker Exposure Assessment
Methods.
The meeting will be held on
January 9–12, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m, eastern time.
Comments: Written comments and
requests to make oral comments are
accepted until the date of the meeting.
However, the Agency encourages the
submission of written comments by
December 26, 2006, and requests to
present oral comments by January 2,
2007. For additional instructions, see
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Nominations: Nominations of
candidates to serve as ad hoc members
of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting
should be provided on or before
November 8, 2006.
Special Accommodations: For
information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to
request accommodation of a disability,
please contact the Designated Federal
Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT at least 10 days
prior to the meeting to give EPA as
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
63008
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 208 / Friday, October 27, 2006 / Notices
much time as possible to process your
request.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Conference Center - Lobby Level, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.
Comments: Submit your comments,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2006–0856, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments. Your use of the Federal
eRulemaking Portal to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA’s preferred
method for receiving comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–
0856. If your comments contain any
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected, please contact
the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
instruction before submitting your
comments. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in a docket index that is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in a docket index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
Nominations, requests to present oral
comments, and requests for special
accommodations: Submit nominations
to serve as an ad hoc member of the
FIFRA SAP, requests for special seating
accommodations, or requests to present
oral comments to the DFO listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy
(7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564–8498; fax number:
(202) 564–8382; e-mail address:
christian.myrta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to persons who are or may be
required to conduct testing of chemical
substances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA). Since other entities
may also be interested, the Agency has
not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number.
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
C. How May I Participate in this
Meeting?
You may participate in this meeting
by following the instructions in this
unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
it is imperative that you identify docket
ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0856 in
the subject line on the first page of your
request.
1. Written comments. Although,
submission of written comments are
accepted until the date of the meeting,
unless otherwise stated, the Agency
encourages that written comments be
submitted, using the instructions in
ADDRESSES, by December 26, 2006, to
provide FIFRA SAP the time necessary
to consider and review the written
comments. There is no limit on the
extent of written comments for
consideration by FIFRA SAP. Persons
wishing to submit written comments at
the meeting should contact the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT and submit 30 copies.
2. Oral comments. Although, requests
to present oral comments are accepted
until the date of the meeting, unless
otherwise stated, to the extent that time
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 208 / Friday, October 27, 2006 / Notices
permits, the Chair of the FIFRA SAP
may permit the presentation of oral
comments at the meeting by interested
persons who have not previously
requested time. However, each
individual or group wishing to make
brief oral comments to FIFRA SAP is
encouraged to submit their request to
the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by January 2,
2007, in order to be included on the
meeting agenda. The request should
identify the name of the individual
making the presentation, the
organization (if any) the individual will
represent, and any requirements for
audiovisual equipment e.g., overhead
projector, 35 mm projector, chalkboard.
Oral comments before FIFRA SAP are
limited to approximately 5 minutes
unless prior arrangements have been
made. In addition, each speaker should
bring 30 copies of his or her comments
and presentation slides for distribution
to FIFRA SAP at the meeting.
3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at
the meeting will be on a first-come
basis.
4. Request for nominations to serve as
ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for
this meeting. As part of a broader
process for developing a pool of
candidates for each meeting, the FIFRA
SAP staff routinely solicits the
stakeholder community for nominations
of prospective candidates for service as
ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP. Any
interested person or organization may
nominate qualified individuals to be
considered as prospective candidates for
a specific meeting. Individuals
nominated for this meeting should have
expertise in one or more of the
following areas: Exposure assessment,
statistics, biological monitoring,
pharmacokinetics, and agricultural
engineering. Nominees should be
scientists who have sufficient
professional qualifications, including
training and experience, to be capable of
providing expert comments on the
scientific issues for this meeting.
Nominees should be identified by name,
occupation, position, address, and
telephone number. Nominations should
be provided to the DFO listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or
before November 8, 2006. The Agency
will consider all nominations of
prospective candidates for this meeting
that are received on or before this date.
However, final selection of ad hoc
members for this meeting is a
discretionary function of the Agency.
The selection of scientists to serve on
the FIFRA SAP is based on the function
of the panel and the expertise needed to
address the Agency’s charge to the
panel. No interested scientists shall be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
ineligible to serve by reason of their
membership on any other advisory
committee to a Federal department or
agency or their employment by a
Federal department or agency except the
EPA. Other factors considered during
the selection process include
availability of the potential panel
member to fully participate in the
panel’s reviews, absence of any conflicts
of interest or appearance of lack of
impartiality, independence with respect
to the matters under review, and lack of
bias. Though financial conflicts of
interest, the appearance of lack of
impartiality, lack of independence, and
bias may result in disqualification, the
absence of such concerns does not
assure that a candidate will be selected
to serve on the FIFRA SAP. Numerous
qualified candidates are identified for
each panel. Therefore, selection
decisions involve carefully weighing a
number of factors including the
candidates’ areas of expertise and
professional qualifications and
achieving an overall balance of different
scientific perspectives on the panel. In
order to have the collective breadth of
experience needed to address the
Agency’s charge for this meeting, the
Agency anticipates selecting
approximately 12 ad hoc scientists.
If a prospective candidate for service
on the FIFRA SAP is considered for
participation in a particular session, the
candidate is subject to the provisions of
5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, as supplemented
by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As such,
the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to
submit a Confidential Financial
Disclosure Form for Special
Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA Form 3110–48 [5–02]) which shall
fully disclose, among other financial
interests, the candidate’s employment,
stocks, and bonds, and where
applicable, sources of research support.
The EPA will evaluate the candidates
financial disclosure form to assess that
there are no financial conflicts of
interest, no appearance of lack of
impartiality and no prior involvement
with the development of the documents
under consideration (including previous
scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for
service on the FIFRA SAP. Those who
are selected from the pool of prospective
candidates will be asked to attend the
public meetings and to participate in the
discussion of key issues and
assumptions at these meetings. In
addition, they will be asked to review
and to help finalize the meeting
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63009
minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP
members participating at this meeting
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web
site at https://epa.gov/scipoly/sap or may
be obtained from the OPP Regulatory
Public Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP
The FIFRA SAP serves as the primary
scientific peer review mechanism of the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances and is
structured to provide scientific advice,
information and recommendations to
the EPA Administrator on pesticides
and pesticide-related issues as to the
impact of regulatory actions on health
and the environment. The FIFRA SAP is
a Federal advisory committee
established in 1975 under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act and operates in accordance with
requirements of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. The SAP is composed of
a permanent panel consisting of seven
members, appointed by the EPA
Administrator from nominees provided
by the National Institutes of Health and
the National Science Foundation.
FIFRA, as amended by the 1996 Food
Quality Protection Act, established a
Science Review Board consisting of at
least 60 scientists who are available to
the SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in
reviews conducted by the Panel. As a
peer review mechanism, the FIFRA SAP
provides comments, evaluations and
recommendations to improve the
effectiveness and quality of scientific
analyses made by Agency scientists.
Members of the FIFRA SAP are
scientists who have sufficient
professional qualifications, including
training and experience, to provide
expert advice and recommendation to
the Agency.
B. Public Meeting
The Agency issued its first
occupational exposure testing
guidelines in the early 1980s. These
guidelines were intended to standardize
the methodology used to conduct the
studies necessary to allow the Agency to
determine the potential exposures, and
consequently risks, associated with the
activities surrounding the use of
pesticides. These activities included
handling pesticides (i.e., mixing,
loading and applying) as well as
working in treated sites following
pesticide applications (e.g., harvesting,
thinning, weeding, servicing cooling
towers). In the early 1990s, two
databases--the Pesticide Handlers
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
63010
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 208 / Friday, October 27, 2006 / Notices
Exposure Database (PHED) and the
Chemical Manufacturers Association
(CMA) data--were constructed in order
to estimate exposures resulting from
mixing/loading/applying pesticides.
The data assembled for use in these
databases were taken from published
literature as well as from industry
studies submitted to the Agency. These
databases have been used as the main
sources for estimating occupational
exposures to workers handling
pesticides for both registration and
reregistration actions. Since the early
1980s, the Agency has been using a
scenario-based approach in its
assessments for estimating exposures for
occupational pesticide handlers (e.g.,
mixers, loaders, and applicators). This
approach is consistent with the
Agency’s guidelines for exposure
assessment which can be found on the
EPA website athttps://cfpub.epa.gov/
ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=15263.
Over the years since the issuance of
the exposure guidelines, there have
been scientific issues raised about the
accuracy of exposure estimates based on
data developed using these methods. In
addition, recent protocols for the
generation of new agricultural pesticide
handler exposure data are being
generated by a pesticide industry task
force and were reviewed by the
Agency’s Human Subjects Review Board
(HSRB) (seehttps://www.epa.gov/osa/
hsrb/files/
june2006finaldraftreport82806.pdf for
further information). The board raised
questions concerning the scientific
merits of the proposed protocols.
Given the scientific issues that have
been raised regarding occupational
pesticide exposure estimates and study
protocols, including the recent
comments from the HSRB, at this time
EPA is asking the FIFRA Scientific
Advisory Panel (SAP) to evaluate, in
detail, issues associated with certain
methodologies used to generate
exposure studies and the procedures
used to develop exposure estimates. As
part of the background for the SAP
meeting, the Agency is developing a
case study that details the procedures
and data the Agency uses to evaluate 6
exposure scenarios that are common in
agriculture. These data can be found in
the existing Pesticide Handlers
Exposure Database.
The following four issues are
expected to be the focus of this SAP
review: Sample collection methods (e.g.,
whole-body dosimetry, handwashing,
facial/neck wipes, and biological
monitoring); data needs (e.g.,
availability of data in the Pesticide
Handlers Exposure Database); unit
exposure (e.g., relating the amount of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
exposure to the amount of chemical
active ingredient handled); and sample
size issues (e.g., inter-/intra-worker
variability and representativeness).
C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting
Minutes
EPA’s position paper, charge/
questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP
composition i.e., members and ad hoc
members for this meeting, and the
meeting agenda will be available by mid
December 2006. In addition, the Agency
may provide additional background
documents as the materials become
available. You may obtain electronic
copies of these documents, and certain
other related documents that might be
available electronically, at https://
www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA
SAP homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
scipoly/sap.
The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting
minutes summarizing its
recommendations to the Agency
approximately 90 days after the
meeting. The meeting minutes will be
posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or
may be obtained from the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: October 19, 2006.
Clifford Gabriel,
Director, Office of Science Coordination and
Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–18036 Filed 10–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201; FRL–8101–4]
Organic Arsenical Herbicides (MSMA,
DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid),
Reregistration Eligibility Decision;
Extension of Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the
Federal Register of August 9, 2006,
concerning the availability of the
reregistration eligibility decision (RED)
for the organic arsenical herbicides
MSMA, DSMA, DAMA, and cacodylic
acid. EPA also issued a notice in the
Federal Register of October 4, 2006,
announcing the extension of the original
comment period by 30 days. This
document is extending the comment
period until December 13, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQOPP-2006-0201 must be received on or
before December 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of August 9, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lance Wormell, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office
of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001;
telephone number: (703) 603-0523; email address:wormell.lance@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
The Agency included in the notice a
list of those who may be potentially
affected by this action. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63007-63010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0856; FRL-8099-8]
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: There will be a 4-day meeting of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel FIFRA SAP to
consider and review Worker Exposure Assessment Methods.
DATES: The meeting will be held on January 9-12, 2007, from 8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m, eastern time.
Comments: Written comments and requests to make oral comments are
accepted until the date of the meeting. However, the Agency encourages
the submission of written comments by December 26, 2006, and requests
to present oral comments by January 2, 2007. For additional
instructions, see Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Nominations: Nominations of candidates to serve as ad hoc members
of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting should be provided on or before
November 8, 2006.
Special Accommodations: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed
under For Further Information Contact at least 10 days prior to the
meeting to give EPA as
[[Page 63008]]
much time as possible to process your request.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Conference Center - Lobby Level, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.
Comments: Submit your comments, identified by docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0856, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Your use of
the Federal eRulemaking Portal to submit comments to EPA electronically
is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0856. If your comments contain any information that you consider
to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the DFO listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special instruction before
submitting your comments. EPA's policy is that all comments received
will be included in the docket without change and may be made available
on-line at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk
or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in a docket index
that is available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in a
docket index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
Nominations, requests to present oral comments, and requests for
special accommodations: Submit nominations to serve as an ad hoc member
of the FIFRA SAP, requests for special seating accommodations, or
requests to present oral comments to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564-8498; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address:
christian.myrta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to
conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection Act of
1996 (FQPA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information subject heading, Federal Register date and page number.
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
C. How May I Participate in this Meeting?
You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0856 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
1. Written comments. Although, submission of written comments are
accepted until the date of the meeting, unless otherwise stated, the
Agency encourages that written comments be submitted, using the
instructions in ADDRESSES, by December 26, 2006, to provide FIFRA SAP
the time necessary to consider and review the written comments. There
is no limit on the extent of written comments for consideration by
FIFRA SAP. Persons wishing to submit written comments at the meeting
should contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and
submit 30 copies.
2. Oral comments. Although, requests to present oral comments are
accepted until the date of the meeting, unless otherwise stated, to the
extent that time
[[Page 63009]]
permits, the Chair of the FIFRA SAP may permit the presentation of oral
comments at the meeting by interested persons who have not previously
requested time. However, each individual or group wishing to make brief
oral comments to FIFRA SAP is encouraged to submit their request to the
DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by January 2, 2007, in
order to be included on the meeting agenda. The request should identify
the name of the individual making the presentation, the organization
(if any) the individual will represent, and any requirements for
audiovisual equipment e.g., overhead projector, 35 mm projector,
chalkboard. Oral comments before FIFRA SAP are limited to approximately
5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In addition, each
speaker should bring 30 copies of his or her comments and presentation
slides for distribution to FIFRA SAP at the meeting.
3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be on a
first-come basis.
4. Request for nominations to serve as ad hoc members of the FIFRA
SAP for this meeting. As part of a broader process for developing a
pool of candidates for each meeting, the FIFRA SAP staff routinely
solicits the stakeholder community for nominations of prospective
candidates for service as ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP. Any
interested person or organization may nominate qualified individuals to
be considered as prospective candidates for a specific meeting.
Individuals nominated for this meeting should have expertise in one or
more of the following areas: Exposure assessment, statistics,
biological monitoring, pharmacokinetics, and agricultural engineering.
Nominees should be scientists who have sufficient professional
qualifications, including training and experience, to be capable of
providing expert comments on the scientific issues for this meeting.
Nominees should be identified by name, occupation, position, address,
and telephone number. Nominations should be provided to the DFO listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before November 8, 2006.
The Agency will consider all nominations of prospective candidates for
this meeting that are received on or before this date. However, final
selection of ad hoc members for this meeting is a discretionary
function of the Agency. The selection of scientists to serve on the
FIFRA SAP is based on the function of the panel and the expertise
needed to address the Agency's charge to the panel. No interested
scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership
on any other advisory committee to a Federal department or agency or
their employment by a Federal department or agency except the EPA.
Other factors considered during the selection process include
availability of the potential panel member to fully participate in the
panel's reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of
lack of impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under
review, and lack of bias. Though financial conflicts of interest, the
appearance of lack of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may
result in disqualification, the absence of such concerns does not
assure that a candidate will be selected to serve on the FIFRA SAP.
Numerous qualified candidates are identified for each panel. Therefore,
selection decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors
including the candidates' areas of expertise and professional
qualifications and achieving an overall balance of different scientific
perspectives on the panel. In order to have the collective breadth of
experience needed to address the Agency's charge for this meeting, the
Agency anticipates selecting approximately 12 ad hoc scientists.
If a prospective candidate for service on the FIFRA SAP is
considered for participation in a particular session, the candidate is
subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, as supplemented by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As
such, the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to submit a Confidential
Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA Form 3110-48 [5-02]) which shall fully disclose, among other
financial interests, the candidate's employment, stocks, and bonds, and
where applicable, sources of research support. The EPA will evaluate
the candidates financial disclosure form to assess that there are no
financial conflicts of interest, no appearance of lack of impartiality
and no prior involvement with the development of the documents under
consideration (including previous scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for service on the FIFRA SAP. Those who
are selected from the pool of prospective candidates will be asked to
attend the public meetings and to participate in the discussion of key
issues and assumptions at these meetings. In addition, they will be
asked to review and to help finalize the meeting minutes. The list of
FIFRA SAP members participating at this meeting will be posted on the
FIFRA SAP web site at https://epa.gov/scipoly/sap or may be obtained
from the OPP Regulatory Public Docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP
The FIFRA SAP serves as the primary scientific peer review
mechanism of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances and is structured
to provide scientific advice, information and recommendations to the
EPA Administrator on pesticides and pesticide-related issues as to the
impact of regulatory actions on health and the environment. The FIFRA
SAP is a Federal advisory committee established in 1975 under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and operates in
accordance with requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The
SAP is composed of a permanent panel consisting of seven members,
appointed by the EPA Administrator from nominees provided by the
National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
FIFRA, as amended by the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act, established
a Science Review Board consisting of at least 60 scientists who are
available to the SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews conducted
by the Panel. As a peer review mechanism, the FIFRA SAP provides
comments, evaluations and recommendations to improve the effectiveness
and quality of scientific analyses made by Agency scientists. Members
of the FIFRA SAP are scientists who have sufficient professional
qualifications, including training and experience, to provide expert
advice and recommendation to the Agency.
B. Public Meeting
The Agency issued its first occupational exposure testing
guidelines in the early 1980s. These guidelines were intended to
standardize the methodology used to conduct the studies necessary to
allow the Agency to determine the potential exposures, and consequently
risks, associated with the activities surrounding the use of
pesticides. These activities included handling pesticides (i.e.,
mixing, loading and applying) as well as working in treated sites
following pesticide applications (e.g., harvesting, thinning, weeding,
servicing cooling towers). In the early 1990s, two databases--the
Pesticide Handlers
[[Page 63010]]
Exposure Database (PHED) and the Chemical Manufacturers Association
(CMA) data--were constructed in order to estimate exposures resulting
from mixing/loading/applying pesticides. The data assembled for use in
these databases were taken from published literature as well as from
industry studies submitted to the Agency. These databases have been
used as the main sources for estimating occupational exposures to
workers handling pesticides for both registration and reregistration
actions. Since the early 1980s, the Agency has been using a scenario-
based approach in its assessments for estimating exposures for
occupational pesticide handlers (e.g., mixers, loaders, and
applicators). This approach is consistent with the Agency's guidelines
for exposure assessment which can be found on the EPA website at https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=15263.
Over the years since the issuance of the exposure guidelines, there
have been scientific issues raised about the accuracy of exposure
estimates based on data developed using these methods. In addition,
recent protocols for the generation of new agricultural pesticide
handler exposure data are being generated by a pesticide industry task
force and were reviewed by the Agency's Human Subjects Review Board
(HSRB) (see https://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/files/june2006finaldraftreport82806.pdf for further information). The
board raised questions concerning the scientific merits of the proposed
protocols.
Given the scientific issues that have been raised regarding
occupational pesticide exposure estimates and study protocols,
including the recent comments from the HSRB, at this time EPA is asking
the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) to evaluate, in detail,
issues associated with certain methodologies used to generate exposure
studies and the procedures used to develop exposure estimates. As part
of the background for the SAP meeting, the Agency is developing a case
study that details the procedures and data the Agency uses to evaluate
6 exposure scenarios that are common in agriculture. These data can be
found in the existing Pesticide Handlers Exposure Database.
The following four issues are expected to be the focus of this SAP
review: Sample collection methods (e.g., whole-body dosimetry,
handwashing, facial/neck wipes, and biological monitoring); data needs
(e.g., availability of data in the Pesticide Handlers Exposure
Database); unit exposure (e.g., relating the amount of exposure to the
amount of chemical active ingredient handled); and sample size issues
(e.g., inter-/intra-worker variability and representativeness).
C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting Minutes
EPA's position paper, charge/questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP
composition i.e., members and ad hoc members for this meeting, and the
meeting agenda will be available by mid December 2006. In addition, the
Agency may provide additional background documents as the materials
become available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents,
and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, at https://www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA SAP
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap.
The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its
recommendations to the Agency approximately 90 days after the meeting.
The meeting minutes will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or may be
obtained from the OPP Regulatory Public Docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.
Dated: October 19, 2006.
Clifford Gabriel,
Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. E6-18036 Filed 10-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S