Information Collection Sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval; OMB Control Number 1018-0121; Depredation Orders for Double-Crested Cormorants, 62484-62485 [E6-17826]

Download as PDF 62484 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 25, 2006 / Notices accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice also lists the following information: Title of Proposal: Monthly Report of Excess Income. OMB Control Number, if applicable: 2502–0086. Description of the need for the information and proposed use Agency form numbers, if applicable: Owners of projects receiving Section 236 rental assistance submit information to participate in retaining some or all of their excess rental charges (Excess Income) for project use or for nonproject use, and to request a return of Excess Income remitted to HUD. HUD uses the information to determine that the project is well-maintained housing in good condition and that the owners have carried out their statutory obligations to remit to HUD all Excess Income that HUD has not authorized them to retain. Agency form numbers, if applicable: HUD–93104. Estimation of the total numbers of hours needed to prepare the information collection including number of respondents, frequency of response, and hours of response. The estimated total annual hours required to prepare the information collection is 41,100; the number of respondents is 3,000 generating 41,100 annual responses; the frequency of response is monthly or annually; and the estimated time needed to prepare the response varies from five to thirty minutes. Status of the proposed information collection: This is an extension of a currently approved collection. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35, as amended. Dated: October 18, 2006. Frank L. Davis, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. E6–17814 Filed 10–24–06; 8:45 am] mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of the Secretary; Renewal of Trinity River Adaptive Management Working Group AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:12 Oct 24, 2006 Jkt 211001 ACTION: Certification Notice of renewal. SUMMARY: We are publishing this notice in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the General Services Administration, hereby renews the Trinity River Adaptive Management Working Group (Working Group) for 2 years. The Working Group provides recommendations on all aspects of the implementation of the Trinity River Restoration Program and affords stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical input concerning Trinity River restoration efforts. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Brown, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521, 707–822–7201. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Working Group conducts its operations in accordance with the provisions of FACA (5 U.S.C. App.). It reports to the Trinity River Management Council and functions solely as an advisory body. The Working Group provides recommendations and advice to the Trinity Management Council on: (1) The effectiveness of management actions in achieving restoration goals and alternative hypotheses (methods and strategies) for study, (2) the priority for restoration projects, (3) funding priorities, and (4) other components of the Trinity River Restoration Program. Working Group members represent the varied interests associated with the Trinity River Restoration Program. Members are selected from, but not limited to, Trinity County residents, recreational and commercial fishermen, commercial and recreational boaters, power/utility companies, agricultural water users, private and commercial timber producers, ranchers and people with grazing rights/permits, tribes, environmental organizations, and Federal, State, and local agencies with responsibilities in the Trinity River Basin. Members must be senior representatives of their respective constituent groups with knowledge of the Trinity River Restoration Program, including the Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management Program. Fifteen days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register, we will file a copy of the Working Group’s charter with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration; Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate; Committee on Resources, United States House of Representatives; and the Library of Congress. PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 I hereby certify that the Trinity River Adaptive Management Working Group is necessary and is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by Public Laws 84–386 and 96–335 (Trinity River Stream Rectification Act), 98–541 and 104–143 (Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Act of 1984, and 102–575 (The Central Valley Improvement Act). The Working Group will assist the Department of the Interior by providing advice and recommendations on all aspects of implementation of the Trinity River Restoration Program. Dated: October 17, 2006. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Interior. [FR Doc. E6–17831 Filed 10–24–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Information Collection Sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval; OMB Control Number 1018–0121; Depredation Orders for Double-Crested Cormorants Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife Service) have sent an Information Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for review and approval. The ICR, which is summarized below, describes the nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost. This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2006. We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. However, under OMB regulations, we may continue to conduct or sponsor this information collection while it is pending at OMB. DATES: You must submit comments on or before November 24, 2006. ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on this ICR to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at OMB–OIRA at (202) 395– 6566 (fax) or OIRA_DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail). Please provide a copy of your comments to Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 62485 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 25, 2006 / Notices (mail); (703) 358–2269 (fax); or hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To request additional information about this ICR, contact Hope Grey at one of the addresses above or by telephone at (703) 358–2482. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OMB Control Number: 1018–0121. Title: Depredation Orders for DoubleCrested Cormorants, 50 CFR 21.47 and 21.48. Service Form Number: None. Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection. Annual number of respondents Activity/requirement Totals ............................................................................ mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Report take of MB species other than DCCOs (21.47(d)(7) & 21.48(d)(7)) ................................................................... Report take of species protected under ESA (21.47(d)(8) & 21.48(d)(8)) ................................................................... Written notice of intent to conduct control activities (21.48(d)(9)) ..................................................................... Report of Control Activities (21.48(d)(10) & (11)) ............... Report Effects of Management Activities (21.48(d)(12)) ..... DCCO Depredation Order Recordkeeping (21.47(d)(9)) ..... Abstract: This information collection is associated with regulations implementing the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.). Under the MBTA, it is unlawful to take, possess, import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, migratory birds or their parts, nests, or eggs, except as authorized by regulations implementing the MBTA. In 2003, we promulgated regulations to authorize the take of double-crested cormorants (DCCOs) under certain circumstances. The regulations at 50 CFR 21.47 (Aquaculture Depredation Order) authorize aquaculture producers in 13 States to take DCCOs when the birds are found committing or about to commit depredations on commercial freshwater aquaculture stocks. The regulations at 50 CFR 21.48 (Public Resource Depredation Order) authorize State fish and wildlife agencies, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (APHISWildlife Services), and federally recognized tribes in 24 States to take DCCOs to prevent depredations on the public resources of fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats. Both 50 CFR 21.47 and 21.48 impose reporting and recordkeeping requirements on those operating under the depredation orders. We use the information collected to: (1) Help assess the impact of the depredation orders on DCCO populations. (2) Protect nontarget migratory birds or other species. (3) Ensure that agencies and individuals are conforming to the terms, conditions, and purpose of the orders. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:12 Oct 24, 2006 Jkt 211001 Completion time per response (hours) Total annual responses Frm 00070 Total burden cost to public ($30/hr) Total annual burden hrs 1 1 1 1 $30 1 1 1 1 30 12 12 9 500 12 12 9 500 3 20 100 7 36 240 900 3,500 1,080 7,200 27,000 105,000 535 535 ........................ 4,678 140,340 (4) Help gauge the effectiveness of the orders at mitigating cormorant-related damages. Comments: On April 19, 2006, we published in the Federal Register (71 FR 20120) a notice of our intent to request that OMB renew approval for this information collection. In that notice, we solicited public comments for 60 days, ending on June 19, 2006. We received two comments. The first commenter noted opposition to the killing of cormorants but, for the most part, did not specifically address the information collection except to say that ‘‘this paperwork * * * is ineffectual in even recording the actual numbers killed.’’ We believe that the reporting provides valid information about the number of birds killed. Following are comments by the second commenter and our responses: Comment: The information will have practical utility only if it is freely accessible to other individuals to assess the accuracy and predictability of the outcomes. Response: We have found the information useful and it is available upon request. Comment: The accuracy of the burden estimate for this collection of information is only valid if crossvalidation is allowed and reassessment of the data by another is conducted without knowledge of the outcome (blind tests). Response: The accuracy of the estimate might be enhanced, but we believe it is of sufficient quality as reported. Comment: The quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected must have transparency, ground truthing, and PO 00000 Affected Public: Aquaculture producers, State fish and wildlife agencies, tribes, and Federal agencies. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Frequency of Collection: Annually for reports; ongoing for recordkeeping. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 redundancy by collaborators and outside entities. Response: We do not believe that ground truthing or other confirmation of the limited data collected is necessary. We again invite comments concerning this information collection on: (1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary, including whether or not the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. Comments submitted in response to this notice are a matter of public record. Dated: August 28, 2006. Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. E6–17826 Filed 10–24–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs Proposed Information Collection Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; Comment Request Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62484-62485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Information Collection Sent to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for Approval; OMB Control Number 1018-0121; Depredation 
Orders for Double-Crested Cormorants

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife Service) have sent an Information 
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for review and approval. The ICR, which 
is summarized below, describes the nature of the collection and the 
estimated burden and cost. This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 
31, 2006. We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to 
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid OMB control number. However, under OMB regulations, we may 
continue to conduct or sponsor this information collection while it is 
pending at OMB.

DATES: You must submit comments on or before November 24, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on this ICR to the Desk 
Officer for the Department of the Interior at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395-
6566 (fax) or OIRA--DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail). Please provide a copy 
of your comments to Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance 
Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222-ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax 
Drive, Arlington, VA 22203

[[Page 62485]]

(mail); (703) 358-2269 (fax); or hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information 
about this ICR, contact Hope Grey at one of the addresses above or by 
telephone at (703) 358-2482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 1018-0121.
    Title: Depredation Orders for Double-Crested Cormorants, 50 CFR 
21.47 and 21.48.
    Service Form Number: None.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Aquaculture producers, State fish and wildlife 
agencies, tribes, and Federal agencies.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    Frequency of Collection: Annually for reports; ongoing for 
recordkeeping.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Completion
                                  Annual  number   Total annual      time per      Total annual    Total burden
      Activity/requirement              of           responses       response       burden hrs    cost to public
                                    respondents                       (hours)                         ($30/hr)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report take of MB species other                1               1               1               1             $30
 than DCCOs (21.47(d)(7) &
 21.48(d)(7))...................
Report take of species protected               1               1               1               1              30
 under ESA (21.47(d)(8) &
 21.48(d)(8))...................
Written notice of intent to                   12              12               3              36           1,080
 conduct control activities
 (21.48(d)(9))..................
Report of Control Activities                  12              12              20             240           7,200
 (21.48(d)(10) & (11))..........
Report Effects of Management                   9               9             100             900          27,000
 Activities (21.48(d)(12))......
DCCO Depredation Order                       500             500               7           3,500         105,000
 Recordkeeping (21.47(d)(9))....
���������������������������������
    Totals......................             535             535  ..............           4,678         140,340
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Abstract: This information collection is associated with 
regulations implementing the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 
U.S.C. 703 et seq.). Under the MBTA, it is unlawful to take, possess, 
import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, 
purchase, or barter, migratory birds or their parts, nests, or eggs, 
except as authorized by regulations implementing the MBTA. In 2003, we 
promulgated regulations to authorize the take of double-crested 
cormorants (DCCOs) under certain circumstances. The regulations at 50 
CFR 21.47 (Aquaculture Depredation Order) authorize aquaculture 
producers in 13 States to take DCCOs when the birds are found 
committing or about to commit depredations on commercial freshwater 
aquaculture stocks. The regulations at 50 CFR 21.48 (Public Resource 
Depredation Order) authorize State fish and wildlife agencies, the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (APHIS-Wildlife Services), and federally 
recognized tribes in 24 States to take DCCOs to prevent depredations on 
the public resources of fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats.
    Both 50 CFR 21.47 and 21.48 impose reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements on those operating under the depredation orders. We use 
the information collected to:
    (1) Help assess the impact of the depredation orders on DCCO 
populations.
    (2) Protect nontarget migratory birds or other species.
    (3) Ensure that agencies and individuals are conforming to the 
terms, conditions, and purpose of the orders.
    (4) Help gauge the effectiveness of the orders at mitigating 
cormorant-related damages.
    Comments: On April 19, 2006, we published in the Federal Register 
(71 FR 20120) a notice of our intent to request that OMB renew approval 
for this information collection. In that notice, we solicited public 
comments for 60 days, ending on June 19, 2006. We received two 
comments.
    The first commenter noted opposition to the killing of cormorants 
but, for the most part, did not specifically address the information 
collection except to say that ``this paperwork * * * is ineffectual in 
even recording the actual numbers killed.'' We believe that the 
reporting provides valid information about the number of birds killed.
    Following are comments by the second commenter and our responses:
    Comment: The information will have practical utility only if it is 
freely accessible to other individuals to assess the accuracy and 
predictability of the outcomes.
    Response: We have found the information useful and it is available 
upon request.
    Comment: The accuracy of the burden estimate for this collection of 
information is only valid if cross-validation is allowed and 
reassessment of the data by another is conducted without knowledge of 
the outcome (blind tests).
    Response: The accuracy of the estimate might be enhanced, but we 
believe it is of sufficient quality as reported.
    Comment: The quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
collected must have transparency, ground truthing, and redundancy by 
collaborators and outside entities.
    Response: We do not believe that ground truthing or other 
confirmation of the limited data collected is necessary.
    We again invite comments concerning this information collection on:
    (1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary, 
including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
    (2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection 
of information;
    (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents. Comments submitted in response to this notice are a matter 
of public record.

    Dated: August 28, 2006.
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6-17826 Filed 10-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.