Small Business Size Standards; Surety Bond Guarantee Program, 62204-62208 [E6-17682]
Download as PDF
62204
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, October 18, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E6–17737 Filed 10–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN: 3245–AE81
Small Business Size Standards; Surety
Bond Guarantee Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the U.S.
Small Business Administration’s (SBA)
November 14, 2005 interim final rule
that amended the small business size
standard for its Surety Bond Guarantee
(SBG) Program for construction (general
or special trades) or service concerns
performing contracts in the
Presidentially-declared disaster areas
resulting from the 2005 Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita, and Wilma by allowing
them to meet either the size standard for
the primary industry in which it,
together with its affiliates, is engaged, or
the current $6.5 million standard for the
SBG Program, whichever is higher. The
size standard under this rule will
remain in effect until SBA determines it
is no longer necessary.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation
becomes effective on November 24,
2006.
Carl
Jordan, Office of Size Standards, (202)
205–6618 or sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantee Program
and Size Standards
SBA, through its SBG Program, can
guarantee bid, performance, payment
and ancillary bonds for contracts up to
$2 million for small contractors who
otherwise cannot obtain surety bonds
without SBA’s guarantee. SBA’s
guarantee gives sureties an incentive to
provide bonding for eligible contractors;
it strengthens a contractor’s ability to
obtain bonding and provides greater
access to contracting opportunities. A
contractor applying for an SBA bond
guarantee must qualify as a small
business concern, in addition to meeting
the surety company’s underwriting
requirements. Generally, except as
modified by the November 14, 2005
interim final rule, businesses in
construction and service industries can
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
qualify as small for the SBG Program on
commercial, local or State contracts, if
their average annual receipts, including
those of their affiliates, for the last 3
fiscal years do not exceed $6.5 million
(13 CFR 121.301(d)(1) and 13 CFR
121.104(c)).
In addition, a concern that qualifies as
small for a prime contract with the
Federal Government is qualified as
‘‘small for financial assistance that is
directly and primarily related to the
performance of that particular contract’’
(13 CFR 121.305). Therefore, if the
concern meets the small business size
standard for the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code designated by the contracting
officer for a specific procurement, the
concern is eligible for SBA’s financial
assistance programs, including the SBG
Program, even when its annual receipts
exceed $6.5 million.
What This Final Rule Accomplishes
On November 14, 2005, SBA
published an interim final rule (70 FR
69048) revising the size standards for
the SBG Program applicable to
construction (general or special trades)
and service concerns performing
contracts in the Gulf Coast Region of the
United States and in Florida that the
President declared disaster areas
following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and
Wilma in 2005. When the contract
meets the performance location
requirement, that interim final rule
established that an SBG Program
applicant concern is small when it
meets the small business size standard
for either the primary industry in which
it, together with its affiliates, is engaged,
or the then current SBG $6.0 million
size standard, whichever is higher. On
December 6, 2005, SBA issued an
interim final rule (70 FR 72577)
adjusting its monetary based size
standards for inflation. In that interim
final rule, SBA changed the surety bond
guarantee size standard from $6.0
million to $6.5 million. Today’s final
rule adopts the November 14, 2005
interim final rule, with the inflation
adjusted size standard of $6.5 million.
Surety companies with whom SBA has
executed a Preferred Surety Bond (PSB)
Agreement under 13 CFR part 115 are
responsible for determining eligibility
under this regulation. SBA surety bond
personnel are responsible for
determining eligibility under this
regulation for those surety guarantees
that require SBA’s prior approval.
This final rule also states in section
121.301(d)(3) that the concern is small
if, together with its affiliates, it meets
the requisite size standard. This merely
clarifies that the concern must include
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the annual receipts or number of
employees of its affiliates when
determining if it is small. This language
is the same as in section 121.301(d)(1).
In addition, under SBA’s small business
size regulations and for all SBA
programs, concerns must always
include the annual receipts or number
of employees of affiliates to determine if
they are small (13 CFR 121.103, 121.104
and 121.106).
In the Supplementary Information in
the November 14, 2005 interim final
rule, SBA stated that the amended size
standards under the interim final rule
are applicable until SBA determines
that it is no longer necessary to expand
the availability of SBG Program
assistance for reconstruction and
recovery of the Gulf Coast Region of the
United States and in Florida that the
President declared disaster areas
following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and
Wilma in 2005. SBA further stated that
the interim final rule was a specific
response to those natural disasters. SBA
recognizes that small construction and
service contractors need this assistance
now and in the very near future.
The need for this size standard for the
SBG Program should be no longer
necessary when expanded contractor
participation has ceased or declined
significantly relative to past experience.
Because of ongoing major recovery
efforts in the disaster areas where this
size standard is valid, SBA cannot
foresee precisely when the need for
expanded SBG assistance in the disaster
areas will end. Construction contracts
can be long term, and subcontracts are
sometimes not awarded or begun until
well into the overall general contract.
SBA does believe, however, that this
could take at least three more years.
SBA will monitor the SBG Program,
particularly the use of this modified size
standard for work in the disaster areas.
SBA’s Office of Surety Guarantees will
monitor annual Federal and State
spending for rebuilding efforts, and as
rebuilding approaches the desired end
state, the office will continue to
scrutinize the size and location of
contracts bonded and the size of the
small businesses that receive them. If
SBA determines that this amended size
standard causes an adverse effect on
local small businesses or that the
modified size standard is no longer
needed, it will terminate or otherwise
modify 13 CFR 121.301(d)(3).
However, SBA will not terminate this
special size standard without first
proposing to do so by publishing a
proposed rule in the Federal Register.
The proposed rule will seek public
comment on discontinuing the size
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
standard, and it will propose a date on
which it would cease to apply.
Cessation or withdrawal of this size
standard will have no affect on
outstanding surety bonds that SBA has
guaranteed. Contractors for whom SBA
has guaranteed their bid bonds will
remain eligible for performance,
payment, maintenance and other
required ancillary bonds, regardless of
when they are needed. Similarly,
contractors for whom SBA has
guaranteed performance and payment
bonds, will remain eligible for
guaranteed maintenance and the other
ancillary bonds required by the contract.
Summary of Comments to the
November 14, 2005 Interim Final Rule
In the November 14, 2005 interim
final rule, SBA requested comments on
how long the amended size standards
should apply to construction and
service concerns performing contracts or
subcontracts in the specified disaster
areas, factors SBA should consider
before determining that the size
standards are no longer necessary, and
the appropriate Agency action after SBA
makes that determination. SBA received
three comments to the interim final rule:
(1) Two surety associations and an
insurance association filed joint
comments on behalf of their member
companies and their producers; (2) an
association of small minority
contractors filed comments on behalf of
its members; and (3) an independent
business submitted comments.
The surety and insurance
associations’ comments reflected their
concern that expanding SBG assistance
to more and larger construction and
service concerns might dilute SBA
financial resources and services
available to the truly small and
emerging contractor. However, as the
association also noted, ‘‘the SBA
program currently is operating at only
one-third of its capacity’’. SBA believes
that its financial resources are sufficient
to absorb the additional obligations it
may undertake under this regulation
without adversely affecting other small
businesses.
The surety and insurance industries
also expressed concern that the rule
could create added administrative
burdens for surety companies
participating in the PSB Program. The
new burdens could involve determining
that an applicant company is within its
industry size standard and assuring the
contractor performs the construction
work within the designated disaster
areas. SBA believes any additional
burden will be minimal. Surety
companies already collect substantial
information on their clients before they
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
extend surety credit, such as annual and
interim financial statements, company
location, past contract performance
information, and contract performance
location.
Furthermore, sureties already review
an applicant’s size. Determining
whether a company meets a size
standard is similar regardless of what
the size standard is—$6.5 million or its
industry standard, expressed in annual
receipts or number of employees.
Sureties collect and report to SBA the
NAICS codes for their clients. SBA does
not believe matching NAICS industry
codes to their small business size
standard constitutes a substantially
increased burden. For construction,
there are few size standards: $31 million
for heavy and civil construction; $13
million for special trades; and $18.5
million for dredging. Size standards for
service industries range from $3.5
million to $32.5 million in average
annual receipts. SBA is not changing
how to calculate whether a business
concern is small. For receipts-based size
standards, the calculation is still based
upon the average annual receipts for the
concern’s 3 immediately preceding
fiscal years. This is the same calculation
used for the current $6.5 million size
standard, and for those concerns and/or
contracts that do not meet the location
of contract performance criterion of this
regulation. Thus, SBA does not believe
there are substantial new burdens
placed on the surety companies in this
rule.
The surety and insurance industries
also expressed concern that SBA would
not honor a surety bond guarantee if a
surety did not properly document that
the bond the company issued and SBA
guaranteed met the criteria required by
this rule. However, the information that
surety companies collect and maintain
for this amended size standard is what
they now collect to support SBA
guaranteed surety bonds. SBA has
specified in this rule that the place of
performance must be within certain
geographical areas in order to use the
amended size standards. SBA expects
that sureties know the place of
performance when they issue surety
bonds. So long as they retain that
information in their underwriting files,
and the place of contract performance is
in fact within the declared disaster
areas, SBA does not see this as
jeopardizing its guarantee on those
bonds.
Moreover, SBA’s small business size
regulations at 13 CFR 121.305 have
permitted a small construction or
service contractor with annual receipts
greater than $6.5 million to qualify for
its SBG Program when a concern is a
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62205
prime contractor with the Federal
Government and it meets the size
standard corresponding to the NAICS
code assigned to the procurement.
Under such circumstances, the surety
has been determining whether a
construction or service concern meets
the size standard for the Federal
procurement for which it submits an
offer as a prime contractor, regardless of
whether or not the concern has receipts
in excess of $6.5 million. Thus, SBA
believes that this final rule creates no
additional burdens on the surety
companies, since they now use the same
criteria under section 121.305. Because
a surety must now determine a
contractor’s eligibility based on the
NAICS code that the contracting officer
specified, SBA does not believe there is
a substantially increased burden under
this final rule.
SBA also received comments from an
association of small minority
contractors. The association opposed
the new SBG Program size standard and
requested an immediate return to the
prior size standard. In lieu of an
immediate return, the association
suggested terminating it 90 days from its
effective date, which was November 14,
2005. The association expressed
concern that increasing the size
standard for these contracts unfairly
increases competition for smaller
businesses, specifically those below the
current $6.5 million SBG size standard.
The association was also concerned that
the interim final rule rendered any
construction or services concern eligible
for SBG assistance, regardless of its
principal place of business, so long as
it performs its contract in the disaster
area and meets the modified size
standard. This would, according to the
association, unnecessarily increase
competition for contractors located in
the disaster areas. The association
believed these factors would negatively
affect small minority contractors, who
most need bond guarantees.
SBA takes very seriously the
possibility of negative effects on smaller
contractors. In this case, however, SBA
does not believe that companies not
located in the disaster areas, if they
perform contracts in the disaster areas
and meet the modified standard, will
adversely affect local small businesses.
Because of the extreme demand for
construction and services in the disaster
areas, SBA expects there will be more
contracts. SBA believes that the priority
should be to help restore and
reconstruct the disaster areas, and all
small businesses should have greater
opportunities to participate in this
effort. As SBA states above, it will
monitor these bonded contracts. If SBA
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
62206
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
finds that this rule has adversely
affected local smaller businesses, then it
will consider withdrawing or otherwise
modifying this subsection.
The third commenter was a small
business that fully supported this
regulation. Based on the commenter’s
remarks, it would appear that this size
standard would not apply to its
businesses. As the commenter describes
his company, it is a supplier of
telecommunications equipment.
Therefore, it is not subject to a receiptsbased size standard. The company
would not be categorized as a
construction or services firm. Rather, it
would be classified as a manufacturer or
dealer subject to a size standard based
on the number of employees. The SBG
size standard that applies is the same as
this rule establishes; that is, it must
meet the size standards for the industry
in which it, together with its affiliates,
is engaged (13 CFR 121.301(d)(2)). The
commenter included additional
comments that were not germane to the
specifics of this regulation, but rather
related to the size standard for the SBG
Program itself.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 12988, and 13132, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) and the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this rule is a
significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. A
general discussion of the need for this
regulatory action and its potential costs
and benefits follows.
1. Is there a need for the regulatory
action?
As discussed in the November 14,
2005 interim final rule, this rule is
necessary to extend the Agency’s SBG
Program to certain construction and
service contractors when they undertake
contracts in the disaster areas. The
amended SBG Program size standard
has limited applicability; that is, to
contracts in the areas that the President
declared a disaster in the Gulf Coast
Region of the United States and in
Florida, following Hurricanes Katrina,
Rita and Wilma in 2005.
The amended size standard enables as
many small construction and service
concerns as possible to help in the
enormous task of renewing and
reconstructing the disaster areas. This
rule will increase available resources
toward that end.
SBA’s statutory mission is to aid and
assist small businesses through a variety
of financial, procurement, business
development and advocacy programs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
To assist intended beneficiaries of these
programs effectively, SBA must
establish distinct standards to define
small businesses. The Small Business
Act (Act) delegates responsibility for
establishing small business definitions
to the SBA Administrator (15 U.S.C.
632(a)). The Act also requires that small
business definitions vary to reflect
industry differences, as necessary. This
modified size standard provides
financial assistance to small businesses,
a part of SBA’s statutory mission.
2. What are the potential benefits and
costs of this regulatory action?
Anticipated total recovery and
reconstruction costs for the Gulf Coast
and Florida will be in the billions of
dollars. SBA cannot estimate the
number or value of contracts, whether
Federal or non-Federal, that small
construction and service concerns will
receive in this undertaking. SBA also
cannot estimate the number or value of
contracts that will require surety bonds
or the number or value of surety bonds
that SBA will guarantee. Nor can it
estimate the number of small businesses
that will participate in the SBG Program
under the expanded eligibility this rule
provides.
SBA can say, however, that given the
possible volume and size of awards, it
is probable that the needs of the disaster
area exceed local available resources, at
least to the extent necessary to
accomplish the necessary work within a
suitable time. SBA believes it is
important to have as many small
businesses as possible participating in
renewing and reconstructing the
disaster areas.
Broadening eligibility for its SBG
Program will provide disaster victims
with significant and timely benefits
when and where the greatest needs
exist. For example, disaster affected
small business concerns can receive
SBG Program assistance to restart their
businesses. Small businesses eligible
under this modified size standard will
also participate, as either general
contractors or subcontractors, in the
reconstruction of the areas’
infrastructure. More small business
concerns may now qualify for surety
bonds with SBA’s guarantee, and
recover from and help others recover
from the hurricanes’ effects.
SBA expects the number of SBA
guaranteed bonds to increase under this
regulation. Although SBA does not
anticipate loss rates changing
significantly, the Government may incur
additional costs to honor its guarantee
on a greater volume of (but stable
percentage of) defaulted bonds. SBA
must honor its guarantees to the sureties
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on defaulted bonds for the percentage of
loss that it guaranteed. Guaranteed
amounts vary as follows: (1) Under the
PSB Program, 70 percent; and (2) under
the prior approval program, contracts
valued at $100,000 or less, or on behalf
of a concern owned by a socially and
economically disadvantaged individual,
or a HUBZone qualified small business,
80 percent to 90 percent (13 CFR 115.31
and 115.68). For fiscal years 2003, 2004
and 2005, SBA’s loss rates were 1.8
percent, 1.3 percent and 1.6 percent,
respectively. SBA expects these rates to
remain stable even though the volume
of SBA guaranteed surety bonds may
increase.
Among businesses seeking SBA’s
assistance through the SBG Program,
there could be additional costs for
professional time required to complete
applications for the surety and the SBA
guarantee. Businesses also incur costs
through payment of fees to participate
in the SBG Program. Surety companies
pay SBA 26 percent of the bond
premium they collect and contractors
pay $7.29 per $1,000 of the contract
value, which the surety companies
remit to SBA (71 FR 9632, dated April
3, 2006). This rule does not affect these
fees. Total fees will increase because
aggregate contract values will increase
as a result of greater usage of the SBG
Program.
Although there have been no protests
of an SBG Program participant’s small
business status in at least the last 5
years, businesses might also incur legal
costs associated with defending
themselves against size protests.
Businesses may also incur legal costs
associated with compliance.
Both surety companies and SBA
could incur additional administrative
costs associated with processing the
anticipated increased volume of surety
bond applications and applications for
the SBA guarantee. There may be
additional administrative costs for PSB
surety bond companies because they
must document the contractors’
eligibility for the SBA guaranteed surety
bond under the amended size standard.
SBA anticipates, however, that these
additional administrative costs will be
minimal because surety companies and
SBA already perform these
administrative functions in the ordinary
course of business. SBA does not
anticipate an increase in its human
resources with the related
administrative costs. The increased
surety fees, as described above, will also
add to SBA’s reserves and
proportionately offset the additional
guarantee payments, if any.
SBA anticipates little or no adverse
effects on currently defined small
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
businesses because of the increased
number of newly eligible small
businesses. Potentially, a newly defined
small business could obtain a contract
that a currently defined small business
might have received. SBA expects those
cases to be few in number because the
decision to award a contract is based on
many considerations. This rule
enhances the environment for small
construction and service concerns to
compete for opportunities and
strengthens their competitiveness
related to contracts in the Gulf Coast
Region of the United States and in
Florida that the President declared
disaster areas following Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005.
For purposes of Executive Order
12988, SBA has drafted this rule, to the
extent practicable, in accordance with
the standards set forth in section 3 of
that Order.
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibility
among the various levels of government.
Therefore, under Executive Order
13132, SBA determines that this rule
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism assessment.
SBA has determined that this rule
does not impose any new information
collection requirements from SBA that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44
U.S.C. Ch. 35.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), this rule may have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Immediately below, SBA sets
forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA). The FRFA addresses
the reasons for promulgating the rule;
the objectives of this rule; SBA’s
descriptions and estimate of the number
of small entities to which the rule will
apply; the projected reporting record
keeping and other compliance
requirements of the rule; the relevant
Federal rules which may duplicate,
overlap or conflict with the rule; and
alternatives considered by SBA.
1. What is the reason for this action?
This rule increases contracting
opportunities for more small businesses.
It extends eligibility for SBG Program
assistance to certain construction and
service contractors that were previously
ineligible for the program because their
average annual receipts exceed $6.5
million. It provides eligibility under the
same small business size standards that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
apply to applicants for all other SBA
financial assistance programs.
Construction and service concerns that
will perform contracts in the Gulf Coast
regions and in Florida that the President
declared disaster areas following
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in
2005 are eligible if they meet the size
standard stated in the regulation.
The amended size standard will also
assist small construction and service
concerns in the disaster areas whose
financial conditions suffered adverse
effects from the disasters. SBA’s SBG
guarantee can afford surety companies
added incentive to provide these
companies surety bonds if they meet
their other underwriting requirements.
2. What are the objectives and legal
basis for the rule?
SBA intends to assist firms that will
contribute to the recovery and
reconstruction efforts in the Gulf Coast
and Florida. SBA’s objective is to
involve as many small businesses as
possible in that effort.
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 632(a)) gives SBA authority to
establish and change size standards.
SBA is using this authority to provide
SBG Program assistance to those who
need it and who can help with recovery
and reconstruction.
3. What is SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small entities
to which the rule will apply?
This rule applies to all construction
(general and special trades) and service
concerns that meet the amended size
standard, regardless of their principal
place of business, that will perform their
SBA guaranteed bonded contracts in the
declared disaster areas. As stated above,
SBA will monitor the SBG Program,
particularly the use of this modified size
standard for work in the disaster areas.
SBA has not assessed the number of
small construction and service
contractors to whom it will apply,
because there is not yet any adequate
data on which to make such an estimate.
SBA cannot estimate how many small
construction and service concerns are in
and how many are outside of the
declared disaster areas. In addition,
while it does have data on small
businesses on a national basis, it does
not have such information by State or
other political jurisdiction. These data
are what SBA uses to evaluate and
establish small business size standards,
which apply on a national basis.
The scope of this amended size
standard is limited to contracts
performed in the Gulf Coast Region of
the United States and in Florida that the
President declared disaster areas
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62207
following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and
Wilma in 2005.
The most significant benefits of this
rule will flow to small construction and
service contractors that had not been
eligible for SBG assistance before this
rule because their average annual
receipts exceeded $6.5 million. Under
this rule, they are eligible if they
(together with their affiliates) meet the
small business size standards for their
primary industries or the current SBG
$6.5 million standard, whichever is
higher, as well as meet the other
requirement as to place of contract
performance. Benefits will also flow to
other entities in the disaster areas that
can use the services of contractors not
eligible for the SBG Program until now.
SBA cannot estimate the number or
value of Federal or non-Federal
contracts that will require surety bonds.
SBA cannot estimate the number of
small businesses that will apply for SBG
guarantees on their surety bonds or how
many of those are located in the
declared disaster areas. SBA believes,
however, that increased contracting
opportunities to participate in SBA’s
SBG Program will provide disaster
victims with significant and timely
benefits. Small construction and service
contractors can receive SBG Program
assistance to restart their businesses, if
necessary, or help in their areas’
reconstruction efforts. Under this size
standard, more small business concerns
may also qualify for more contracts and
surety bonds with SBA’s guarantee.
Entities that are not small businesses,
such as not-for-profit entities, cities,
towns, and other political subdivisions
that often require contractors to provide
surety bonds to guarantee their contract
performance, will benefit as well,
because there will be a larger pool of
bondable contractors that can perform
work as needed.
4. Summary of significant issues raised
by the public in response to the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in the
November 14, 2005 Interim Final Rule
SBA summarized above the three
comments it received to the November
14, 2005 interim final rule. The surety
and insurance industries’ comments
addressed a perceived increased
recordkeeping burden on them to
preserve SBA’s guarantee on bonds they
issue under this rule. However, SBA
does not believe that this rule adds any
additional recordkeeping requirements
since it does not require sureties to
maintain any information that they are
not already required to maintain when
they issue a bond with SBA’s guarantee.
The surety must document that the
concern meets the small business size
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
62208
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
standard, which will continue as a
requirement. The surety also knows
where the contractor will perform its
contract or subcontract before it issues
its bond. Under this modified size
standard, before issuing a surety bond
with SBA’s guarantees, the surety must
be sure the bond guarantees a contract
in one or more of the counties or
parishes that the President declared
disaster areas following Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005. SBA
has made the list of those counties and
parishes readily available at https://
www.sba.gov/disaster_recov/
katrina_rita_and_wilma_counties.pdf.
The association of small minority
contractors expressed concern that there
will be increased competition for
contracts in the disaster areas as a result
of this rule. This competition could
come both from larger small companies
in the disaster areas and from out of
state companies. As stated above, SBA
takes very seriously the possibility of
negative effects on smaller contractors.
In this case, however, SBA does not
believe that companies not located in
the disaster areas, if they are performing
contracts in the disaster areas and meet
this modified standard, will adversely
affect resident small businesses.
Because of the extreme demand for
construction and services in the disaster
areas, SBA expects there will be more
contracts in the affected areas. SBA
believes that the priority should be to
help restore and reconstruct the disaster
areas, and all small businesses should
have greater opportunities to participate
in this. SBA will monitor bonded
contracts for which SBA has extended
its guarantee. If SBA finds that this rule
has adversely affected local smaller
businesses, then it will consider
withdrawing or otherwise modifying
this subsection.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
5. Will this rule impose any additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on small business entities?
This rule does not impose any new
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1980, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35. A new size
standard does not impose any
additional reporting, recordkeeping or
compliance requirements on small
entities. Increasing size standards
expands access to SBA programs that
assist small businesses, but does not
impose a regulatory burden because
small business size standards neither
regulate nor control business behavior.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
6. What are the relevant Federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap or conflict
with this rule?
This rule affects only SBA’s SBG
Program. This rule does not overlap
with other Federal rules that use SBA’s
size standards to define a small
business. Under § 632(a)(2)(C) of the
Small Business Act, unless specifically
authorized by statute, Federal agencies
must use SBA’s size standards to define
a small business. SBA published in the
November 24, 1995, Federal Register a
table of statutory and regulatory size
standards set by agencies other than
SBA. (60 FR 57988–57991) SBA is not
aware of any Federal rule that would
duplicate or conflict with this rule.
7. What alternatives did SBA consider?
SBA considered establishing a
termination date for application of this
size standard. SBA is not adopting this
approach because it has no data it can
use to anticipate when the amended size
standard should no longer be available.
Because SBA will be monitoring use of
this size standard, it will be able to
determine in the future how long the
Agency should retain it for the SBG
Program. As discussed above in the
Supplemental Information, SBA will not
terminate or withdraw this size standard
without first seeking public comment to
a proposed rule to do so. SBA will
publish, in accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act, its
proposal in the Federal Register.
Another alternative SBA considered
was limiting applicability to concerns
that were located within or had a place
of business in the disaster areas when
the hurricanes occurred. As noted
above, some commenters indicated a
preference for limiting eligibility to
small businesses located within the
disaster areas. Because this is a specific
response to the disasters’ effects, SBA
believes it must increase available
resources for the recovery and
reconstruction by increasing the number
of small businesses that can participate
in this work. SBA’s Office of Surety
Guarantees will continue to monitor the
SBG Program, including in particular
the use of this modified size standard,
for work in the disaster areas. SBA will
examine the size of contracts bonded
and the size of the small businesses that
receive them. If SBA determines that
this amended size standard causes an
adverse effect on local small businesses
or that the modified size standard is no
longer necessary, it will consider
modifying the regulation.
SBA also considered applying this
size standard to any contract, no matter
where performed, provided it was
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
directly and/or primarily related to the
recovery and reconstruction efforts in
the declared disaster areas. However,
SBA believes that establishing a clear
and direct nexus of a contract or
subcontract to the recovery and
reconstruction efforts in the disaster
areas would not be practicable, and
would cause an unnecessary burden on
sureties.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Government procurement, Loan
programs—business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
business.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 121 of title 13
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
I
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(b),
637(a), 644, and 662(5); and Pub. L. 105–135,
sec. 401 et seq., 111 Stat. 2592.
2. Amend § 121.301 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) and paragraph (d)(3) to
read as follows:
I
§ 121.301 What size standards are
applicable to financial assistance
programs?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Any construction (general or
special trade) concern or concern
performing a contract for services is
small if, together with its affiliates, its
average annual receipts do not exceed
$6.5 million, except as provided in
§ 121.301(d)(3).
(2) * * *
(3) For any contract or subcontract,
public or private, to be performed in the
Presidentially-declared disaster areas
resulting from the 2005 Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita or Wilma, a construction
(general or special trade) concern or
concern performing a contract for
services is small if, together with its
affiliates, it meets the size standard for
the primary industry in which it,
together with its affiliates, is engaged, or
if it meets the size standard set forth in
paragraph (d)(1), whichever is higher.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–17682 Filed 10–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 24, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62204-62208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17682]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN: 3245-AE81
Small Business Size Standards; Surety Bond Guarantee Program
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the U.S. Small Business Administration's
(SBA) November 14, 2005 interim final rule that amended the small
business size standard for its Surety Bond Guarantee (SBG) Program for
construction (general or special trades) or service concerns performing
contracts in the Presidentially-declared disaster areas resulting from
the 2005 Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma by allowing them to meet
either the size standard for the primary industry in which it, together
with its affiliates, is engaged, or the current $6.5 million standard
for the SBG Program, whichever is higher. The size standard under this
rule will remain in effect until SBA determines it is no longer
necessary.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation becomes effective on November
24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Jordan, Office of Size Standards,
(202) 205-6618 or sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee Program and Size Standards
SBA, through its SBG Program, can guarantee bid, performance,
payment and ancillary bonds for contracts up to $2 million for small
contractors who otherwise cannot obtain surety bonds without SBA's
guarantee. SBA's guarantee gives sureties an incentive to provide
bonding for eligible contractors; it strengthens a contractor's ability
to obtain bonding and provides greater access to contracting
opportunities. A contractor applying for an SBA bond guarantee must
qualify as a small business concern, in addition to meeting the surety
company's underwriting requirements. Generally, except as modified by
the November 14, 2005 interim final rule, businesses in construction
and service industries can qualify as small for the SBG Program on
commercial, local or State contracts, if their average annual receipts,
including those of their affiliates, for the last 3 fiscal years do not
exceed $6.5 million (13 CFR 121.301(d)(1) and 13 CFR 121.104(c)).
In addition, a concern that qualifies as small for a prime contract
with the Federal Government is qualified as ``small for financial
assistance that is directly and primarily related to the performance of
that particular contract'' (13 CFR 121.305). Therefore, if the concern
meets the small business size standard for the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code designated by the contracting
officer for a specific procurement, the concern is eligible for SBA's
financial assistance programs, including the SBG Program, even when its
annual receipts exceed $6.5 million.
What This Final Rule Accomplishes
On November 14, 2005, SBA published an interim final rule (70 FR
69048) revising the size standards for the SBG Program applicable to
construction (general or special trades) and service concerns
performing contracts in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States and
in Florida that the President declared disaster areas following
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005. When the contract meets the
performance location requirement, that interim final rule established
that an SBG Program applicant concern is small when it meets the small
business size standard for either the primary industry in which it,
together with its affiliates, is engaged, or the then current SBG $6.0
million size standard, whichever is higher. On December 6, 2005, SBA
issued an interim final rule (70 FR 72577) adjusting its monetary based
size standards for inflation. In that interim final rule, SBA changed
the surety bond guarantee size standard from $6.0 million to $6.5
million. Today's final rule adopts the November 14, 2005 interim final
rule, with the inflation adjusted size standard of $6.5 million. Surety
companies with whom SBA has executed a Preferred Surety Bond (PSB)
Agreement under 13 CFR part 115 are responsible for determining
eligibility under this regulation. SBA surety bond personnel are
responsible for determining eligibility under this regulation for those
surety guarantees that require SBA's prior approval.
This final rule also states in section 121.301(d)(3) that the
concern is small if, together with its affiliates, it meets the
requisite size standard. This merely clarifies that the concern must
include the annual receipts or number of employees of its affiliates
when determining if it is small. This language is the same as in
section 121.301(d)(1). In addition, under SBA's small business size
regulations and for all SBA programs, concerns must always include the
annual receipts or number of employees of affiliates to determine if
they are small (13 CFR 121.103, 121.104 and 121.106).
In the Supplementary Information in the November 14, 2005 interim
final rule, SBA stated that the amended size standards under the
interim final rule are applicable until SBA determines that it is no
longer necessary to expand the availability of SBG Program assistance
for reconstruction and recovery of the Gulf Coast Region of the United
States and in Florida that the President declared disaster areas
following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005. SBA further
stated that the interim final rule was a specific response to those
natural disasters. SBA recognizes that small construction and service
contractors need this assistance now and in the very near future.
The need for this size standard for the SBG Program should be no
longer necessary when expanded contractor participation has ceased or
declined significantly relative to past experience. Because of ongoing
major recovery efforts in the disaster areas where this size standard
is valid, SBA cannot foresee precisely when the need for expanded SBG
assistance in the disaster areas will end. Construction contracts can
be long term, and subcontracts are sometimes not awarded or begun until
well into the overall general contract. SBA does believe, however, that
this could take at least three more years.
SBA will monitor the SBG Program, particularly the use of this
modified size standard for work in the disaster areas. SBA's Office of
Surety Guarantees will monitor annual Federal and State spending for
rebuilding efforts, and as rebuilding approaches the desired end state,
the office will continue to scrutinize the size and location of
contracts bonded and the size of the small businesses that receive
them. If SBA determines that this amended size standard causes an
adverse effect on local small businesses or that the modified size
standard is no longer needed, it will terminate or otherwise modify 13
CFR 121.301(d)(3).
However, SBA will not terminate this special size standard without
first proposing to do so by publishing a proposed rule in the Federal
Register. The proposed rule will seek public comment on discontinuing
the size
[[Page 62205]]
standard, and it will propose a date on which it would cease to apply.
Cessation or withdrawal of this size standard will have no affect
on outstanding surety bonds that SBA has guaranteed. Contractors for
whom SBA has guaranteed their bid bonds will remain eligible for
performance, payment, maintenance and other required ancillary bonds,
regardless of when they are needed. Similarly, contractors for whom SBA
has guaranteed performance and payment bonds, will remain eligible for
guaranteed maintenance and the other ancillary bonds required by the
contract.
Summary of Comments to the November 14, 2005 Interim Final Rule
In the November 14, 2005 interim final rule, SBA requested comments
on how long the amended size standards should apply to construction and
service concerns performing contracts or subcontracts in the specified
disaster areas, factors SBA should consider before determining that the
size standards are no longer necessary, and the appropriate Agency
action after SBA makes that determination. SBA received three comments
to the interim final rule: (1) Two surety associations and an insurance
association filed joint comments on behalf of their member companies
and their producers; (2) an association of small minority contractors
filed comments on behalf of its members; and (3) an independent
business submitted comments.
The surety and insurance associations' comments reflected their
concern that expanding SBG assistance to more and larger construction
and service concerns might dilute SBA financial resources and services
available to the truly small and emerging contractor. However, as the
association also noted, ``the SBA program currently is operating at
only one-third of its capacity''. SBA believes that its financial
resources are sufficient to absorb the additional obligations it may
undertake under this regulation without adversely affecting other small
businesses.
The surety and insurance industries also expressed concern that the
rule could create added administrative burdens for surety companies
participating in the PSB Program. The new burdens could involve
determining that an applicant company is within its industry size
standard and assuring the contractor performs the construction work
within the designated disaster areas. SBA believes any additional
burden will be minimal. Surety companies already collect substantial
information on their clients before they extend surety credit, such as
annual and interim financial statements, company location, past
contract performance information, and contract performance location.
Furthermore, sureties already review an applicant's size.
Determining whether a company meets a size standard is similar
regardless of what the size standard is--$6.5 million or its industry
standard, expressed in annual receipts or number of employees. Sureties
collect and report to SBA the NAICS codes for their clients. SBA does
not believe matching NAICS industry codes to their small business size
standard constitutes a substantially increased burden. For
construction, there are few size standards: $31 million for heavy and
civil construction; $13 million for special trades; and $18.5 million
for dredging. Size standards for service industries range from $3.5
million to $32.5 million in average annual receipts. SBA is not
changing how to calculate whether a business concern is small. For
receipts-based size standards, the calculation is still based upon the
average annual receipts for the concern's 3 immediately preceding
fiscal years. This is the same calculation used for the current $6.5
million size standard, and for those concerns and/or contracts that do
not meet the location of contract performance criterion of this
regulation. Thus, SBA does not believe there are substantial new
burdens placed on the surety companies in this rule.
The surety and insurance industries also expressed concern that SBA
would not honor a surety bond guarantee if a surety did not properly
document that the bond the company issued and SBA guaranteed met the
criteria required by this rule. However, the information that surety
companies collect and maintain for this amended size standard is what
they now collect to support SBA guaranteed surety bonds. SBA has
specified in this rule that the place of performance must be within
certain geographical areas in order to use the amended size standards.
SBA expects that sureties know the place of performance when they issue
surety bonds. So long as they retain that information in their
underwriting files, and the place of contract performance is in fact
within the declared disaster areas, SBA does not see this as
jeopardizing its guarantee on those bonds.
Moreover, SBA's small business size regulations at 13 CFR 121.305
have permitted a small construction or service contractor with annual
receipts greater than $6.5 million to qualify for its SBG Program when
a concern is a prime contractor with the Federal Government and it
meets the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the
procurement. Under such circumstances, the surety has been determining
whether a construction or service concern meets the size standard for
the Federal procurement for which it submits an offer as a prime
contractor, regardless of whether or not the concern has receipts in
excess of $6.5 million. Thus, SBA believes that this final rule creates
no additional burdens on the surety companies, since they now use the
same criteria under section 121.305. Because a surety must now
determine a contractor's eligibility based on the NAICS code that the
contracting officer specified, SBA does not believe there is a
substantially increased burden under this final rule.
SBA also received comments from an association of small minority
contractors. The association opposed the new SBG Program size standard
and requested an immediate return to the prior size standard. In lieu
of an immediate return, the association suggested terminating it 90
days from its effective date, which was November 14, 2005. The
association expressed concern that increasing the size standard for
these contracts unfairly increases competition for smaller businesses,
specifically those below the current $6.5 million SBG size standard.
The association was also concerned that the interim final rule rendered
any construction or services concern eligible for SBG assistance,
regardless of its principal place of business, so long as it performs
its contract in the disaster area and meets the modified size standard.
This would, according to the association, unnecessarily increase
competition for contractors located in the disaster areas. The
association believed these factors would negatively affect small
minority contractors, who most need bond guarantees.
SBA takes very seriously the possibility of negative effects on
smaller contractors. In this case, however, SBA does not believe that
companies not located in the disaster areas, if they perform contracts
in the disaster areas and meet the modified standard, will adversely
affect local small businesses. Because of the extreme demand for
construction and services in the disaster areas, SBA expects there will
be more contracts. SBA believes that the priority should be to help
restore and reconstruct the disaster areas, and all small businesses
should have greater opportunities to participate in this effort. As SBA
states above, it will monitor these bonded contracts. If SBA
[[Page 62206]]
finds that this rule has adversely affected local smaller businesses,
then it will consider withdrawing or otherwise modifying this
subsection.
The third commenter was a small business that fully supported this
regulation. Based on the commenter's remarks, it would appear that this
size standard would not apply to its businesses. As the commenter
describes his company, it is a supplier of telecommunications
equipment. Therefore, it is not subject to a receipts-based size
standard. The company would not be categorized as a construction or
services firm. Rather, it would be classified as a manufacturer or
dealer subject to a size standard based on the number of employees. The
SBG size standard that applies is the same as this rule establishes;
that is, it must meet the size standards for the industry in which it,
together with its affiliates, is engaged (13 CFR 121.301(d)(2)). The
commenter included additional comments that were not germane to the
specifics of this regulation, but rather related to the size standard
for the SBG Program itself.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 12988, and 13132, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) and the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this rule
is a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. A general discussion of the need for this regulatory
action and its potential costs and benefits follows.
1. Is there a need for the regulatory action?
As discussed in the November 14, 2005 interim final rule, this rule
is necessary to extend the Agency's SBG Program to certain construction
and service contractors when they undertake contracts in the disaster
areas. The amended SBG Program size standard has limited applicability;
that is, to contracts in the areas that the President declared a
disaster in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States and in Florida,
following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005.
The amended size standard enables as many small construction and
service concerns as possible to help in the enormous task of renewing
and reconstructing the disaster areas. This rule will increase
available resources toward that end.
SBA's statutory mission is to aid and assist small businesses
through a variety of financial, procurement, business development and
advocacy programs. To assist intended beneficiaries of these programs
effectively, SBA must establish distinct standards to define small
businesses. The Small Business Act (Act) delegates responsibility for
establishing small business definitions to the SBA Administrator (15
U.S.C. 632(a)). The Act also requires that small business definitions
vary to reflect industry differences, as necessary. This modified size
standard provides financial assistance to small businesses, a part of
SBA's statutory mission.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory action?
Anticipated total recovery and reconstruction costs for the Gulf
Coast and Florida will be in the billions of dollars. SBA cannot
estimate the number or value of contracts, whether Federal or non-
Federal, that small construction and service concerns will receive in
this undertaking. SBA also cannot estimate the number or value of
contracts that will require surety bonds or the number or value of
surety bonds that SBA will guarantee. Nor can it estimate the number of
small businesses that will participate in the SBG Program under the
expanded eligibility this rule provides.
SBA can say, however, that given the possible volume and size of
awards, it is probable that the needs of the disaster area exceed local
available resources, at least to the extent necessary to accomplish the
necessary work within a suitable time. SBA believes it is important to
have as many small businesses as possible participating in renewing and
reconstructing the disaster areas.
Broadening eligibility for its SBG Program will provide disaster
victims with significant and timely benefits when and where the
greatest needs exist. For example, disaster affected small business
concerns can receive SBG Program assistance to restart their
businesses. Small businesses eligible under this modified size standard
will also participate, as either general contractors or subcontractors,
in the reconstruction of the areas' infrastructure. More small business
concerns may now qualify for surety bonds with SBA's guarantee, and
recover from and help others recover from the hurricanes' effects.
SBA expects the number of SBA guaranteed bonds to increase under
this regulation. Although SBA does not anticipate loss rates changing
significantly, the Government may incur additional costs to honor its
guarantee on a greater volume of (but stable percentage of) defaulted
bonds. SBA must honor its guarantees to the sureties on defaulted bonds
for the percentage of loss that it guaranteed. Guaranteed amounts vary
as follows: (1) Under the PSB Program, 70 percent; and (2) under the
prior approval program, contracts valued at $100,000 or less, or on
behalf of a concern owned by a socially and economically disadvantaged
individual, or a HUBZone qualified small business, 80 percent to 90
percent (13 CFR 115.31 and 115.68). For fiscal years 2003, 2004 and
2005, SBA's loss rates were 1.8 percent, 1.3 percent and 1.6 percent,
respectively. SBA expects these rates to remain stable even though the
volume of SBA guaranteed surety bonds may increase.
Among businesses seeking SBA's assistance through the SBG Program,
there could be additional costs for professional time required to
complete applications for the surety and the SBA guarantee. Businesses
also incur costs through payment of fees to participate in the SBG
Program. Surety companies pay SBA 26 percent of the bond premium they
collect and contractors pay $7.29 per $1,000 of the contract value,
which the surety companies remit to SBA (71 FR 9632, dated April 3,
2006). This rule does not affect these fees. Total fees will increase
because aggregate contract values will increase as a result of greater
usage of the SBG Program.
Although there have been no protests of an SBG Program
participant's small business status in at least the last 5 years,
businesses might also incur legal costs associated with defending
themselves against size protests. Businesses may also incur legal costs
associated with compliance.
Both surety companies and SBA could incur additional administrative
costs associated with processing the anticipated increased volume of
surety bond applications and applications for the SBA guarantee. There
may be additional administrative costs for PSB surety bond companies
because they must document the contractors' eligibility for the SBA
guaranteed surety bond under the amended size standard. SBA
anticipates, however, that these additional administrative costs will
be minimal because surety companies and SBA already perform these
administrative functions in the ordinary course of business. SBA does
not anticipate an increase in its human resources with the related
administrative costs. The increased surety fees, as described above,
will also add to SBA's reserves and proportionately offset the
additional guarantee payments, if any.
SBA anticipates little or no adverse effects on currently defined
small
[[Page 62207]]
businesses because of the increased number of newly eligible small
businesses. Potentially, a newly defined small business could obtain a
contract that a currently defined small business might have received.
SBA expects those cases to be few in number because the decision to
award a contract is based on many considerations. This rule enhances
the environment for small construction and service concerns to compete
for opportunities and strengthens their competitiveness related to
contracts in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States and in Florida
that the President declared disaster areas following Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005.
For purposes of Executive Order 12988, SBA has drafted this rule,
to the extent practicable, in accordance with the standards set forth
in section 3 of that Order.
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibility among the
various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132,
SBA determines that this rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment.
SBA has determined that this rule does not impose any new
information collection requirements from SBA that require approval by
OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), this rule may have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA). The FRFA addresses the reasons for promulgating the
rule; the objectives of this rule; SBA's descriptions and estimate of
the number of small entities to which the rule will apply; the
projected reporting record keeping and other compliance requirements of
the rule; the relevant Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap or
conflict with the rule; and alternatives considered by SBA.
1. What is the reason for this action?
This rule increases contracting opportunities for more small
businesses. It extends eligibility for SBG Program assistance to
certain construction and service contractors that were previously
ineligible for the program because their average annual receipts exceed
$6.5 million. It provides eligibility under the same small business
size standards that apply to applicants for all other SBA financial
assistance programs. Construction and service concerns that will
perform contracts in the Gulf Coast regions and in Florida that the
President declared disaster areas following Hurricanes Katrina, Rita
and Wilma in 2005 are eligible if they meet the size standard stated in
the regulation.
The amended size standard will also assist small construction and
service concerns in the disaster areas whose financial conditions
suffered adverse effects from the disasters. SBA's SBG guarantee can
afford surety companies added incentive to provide these companies
surety bonds if they meet their other underwriting requirements.
2. What are the objectives and legal basis for the rule?
SBA intends to assist firms that will contribute to the recovery
and reconstruction efforts in the Gulf Coast and Florida. SBA's
objective is to involve as many small businesses as possible in that
effort.
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) gives SBA
authority to establish and change size standards. SBA is using this
authority to provide SBG Program assistance to those who need it and
who can help with recovery and reconstruction.
3. What is SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
entities to which the rule will apply?
This rule applies to all construction (general and special trades)
and service concerns that meet the amended size standard, regardless of
their principal place of business, that will perform their SBA
guaranteed bonded contracts in the declared disaster areas. As stated
above, SBA will monitor the SBG Program, particularly the use of this
modified size standard for work in the disaster areas. SBA has not
assessed the number of small construction and service contractors to
whom it will apply, because there is not yet any adequate data on which
to make such an estimate. SBA cannot estimate how many small
construction and service concerns are in and how many are outside of
the declared disaster areas. In addition, while it does have data on
small businesses on a national basis, it does not have such information
by State or other political jurisdiction. These data are what SBA uses
to evaluate and establish small business size standards, which apply on
a national basis.
The scope of this amended size standard is limited to contracts
performed in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States and in Florida
that the President declared disaster areas following Hurricanes
Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005.
The most significant benefits of this rule will flow to small
construction and service contractors that had not been eligible for SBG
assistance before this rule because their average annual receipts
exceeded $6.5 million. Under this rule, they are eligible if they
(together with their affiliates) meet the small business size standards
for their primary industries or the current SBG $6.5 million standard,
whichever is higher, as well as meet the other requirement as to place
of contract performance. Benefits will also flow to other entities in
the disaster areas that can use the services of contractors not
eligible for the SBG Program until now.
SBA cannot estimate the number or value of Federal or non-Federal
contracts that will require surety bonds. SBA cannot estimate the
number of small businesses that will apply for SBG guarantees on their
surety bonds or how many of those are located in the declared disaster
areas. SBA believes, however, that increased contracting opportunities
to participate in SBA's SBG Program will provide disaster victims with
significant and timely benefits. Small construction and service
contractors can receive SBG Program assistance to restart their
businesses, if necessary, or help in their areas' reconstruction
efforts. Under this size standard, more small business concerns may
also qualify for more contracts and surety bonds with SBA's guarantee.
Entities that are not small businesses, such as not-for-profit
entities, cities, towns, and other political subdivisions that often
require contractors to provide surety bonds to guarantee their contract
performance, will benefit as well, because there will be a larger pool
of bondable contractors that can perform work as needed.
4. Summary of significant issues raised by the public in response to
the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in the November 14, 2005
Interim Final Rule
SBA summarized above the three comments it received to the November
14, 2005 interim final rule. The surety and insurance industries'
comments addressed a perceived increased recordkeeping burden on them
to preserve SBA's guarantee on bonds they issue under this rule.
However, SBA does not believe that this rule adds any additional
recordkeeping requirements since it does not require sureties to
maintain any information that they are not already required to maintain
when they issue a bond with SBA's guarantee. The surety must document
that the concern meets the small business size
[[Page 62208]]
standard, which will continue as a requirement. The surety also knows
where the contractor will perform its contract or subcontract before it
issues its bond. Under this modified size standard, before issuing a
surety bond with SBA's guarantees, the surety must be sure the bond
guarantees a contract in one or more of the counties or parishes that
the President declared disaster areas following Hurricanes Katrina,
Rita and Wilma in 2005. SBA has made the list of those counties and
parishes readily available at https://www.sba.gov/disaster_recov/
katrina_rita_and_wilma_counties.pdf.
The association of small minority contractors expressed concern
that there will be increased competition for contracts in the disaster
areas as a result of this rule. This competition could come both from
larger small companies in the disaster areas and from out of state
companies. As stated above, SBA takes very seriously the possibility of
negative effects on smaller contractors. In this case, however, SBA
does not believe that companies not located in the disaster areas, if
they are performing contracts in the disaster areas and meet this
modified standard, will adversely affect resident small businesses.
Because of the extreme demand for construction and services in the
disaster areas, SBA expects there will be more contracts in the
affected areas. SBA believes that the priority should be to help
restore and reconstruct the disaster areas, and all small businesses
should have greater opportunities to participate in this. SBA will
monitor bonded contracts for which SBA has extended its guarantee. If
SBA finds that this rule has adversely affected local smaller
businesses, then it will consider withdrawing or otherwise modifying
this subsection.
5. Will this rule impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on small business entities?
This rule does not impose any new information collection
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. Ch.
35. A new size standard does not impose any additional reporting,
recordkeeping or compliance requirements on small entities. Increasing
size standards expands access to SBA programs that assist small
businesses, but does not impose a regulatory burden because small
business size standards neither regulate nor control business behavior.
6. What are the relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule?
This rule affects only SBA's SBG Program. This rule does not
overlap with other Federal rules that use SBA's size standards to
define a small business. Under Sec. 632(a)(2)(C) of the Small Business
Act, unless specifically authorized by statute, Federal agencies must
use SBA's size standards to define a small business. SBA published in
the November 24, 1995, Federal Register a table of statutory and
regulatory size standards set by agencies other than SBA. (60 FR 57988-
57991) SBA is not aware of any Federal rule that would duplicate or
conflict with this rule.
7. What alternatives did SBA consider?
SBA considered establishing a termination date for application of
this size standard. SBA is not adopting this approach because it has no
data it can use to anticipate when the amended size standard should no
longer be available. Because SBA will be monitoring use of this size
standard, it will be able to determine in the future how long the
Agency should retain it for the SBG Program. As discussed above in the
Supplemental Information, SBA will not terminate or withdraw this size
standard without first seeking public comment to a proposed rule to do
so. SBA will publish, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure
Act, its proposal in the Federal Register.
Another alternative SBA considered was limiting applicability to
concerns that were located within or had a place of business in the
disaster areas when the hurricanes occurred. As noted above, some
commenters indicated a preference for limiting eligibility to small
businesses located within the disaster areas. Because this is a
specific response to the disasters' effects, SBA believes it must
increase available resources for the recovery and reconstruction by
increasing the number of small businesses that can participate in this
work. SBA's Office of Surety Guarantees will continue to monitor the
SBG Program, including in particular the use of this modified size
standard, for work in the disaster areas. SBA will examine the size of
contracts bonded and the size of the small businesses that receive
them. If SBA determines that this amended size standard causes an
adverse effect on local small businesses or that the modified size
standard is no longer necessary, it will consider modifying the
regulation.
SBA also considered applying this size standard to any contract, no
matter where performed, provided it was directly and/or primarily
related to the recovery and reconstruction efforts in the declared
disaster areas. However, SBA believes that establishing a clear and
direct nexus of a contract or subcontract to the recovery and
reconstruction efforts in the disaster areas would not be practicable,
and would cause an unnecessary burden on sureties.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Government procurement, Loan programs--business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small business.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 121 of title 13
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(b), 637(a), 644, and
662(5); and Pub. L. 105-135, sec. 401 et seq., 111 Stat. 2592.
0
2. Amend Sec. 121.301 by revising paragraph (d)(1) and paragraph
(d)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.301 What size standards are applicable to financial
assistance programs?
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Any construction (general or special trade) concern or concern
performing a contract for services is small if, together with its
affiliates, its average annual receipts do not exceed $6.5 million,
except as provided in Sec. 121.301(d)(3).
(2) * * *
(3) For any contract or subcontract, public or private, to be
performed in the Presidentially-declared disaster areas resulting from
the 2005 Hurricanes Katrina, Rita or Wilma, a construction (general or
special trade) concern or concern performing a contract for services is
small if, together with its affiliates, it meets the size standard for
the primary industry in which it, together with its affiliates, is
engaged, or if it meets the size standard set forth in paragraph
(d)(1), whichever is higher.
* * * * *
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-17682 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P