For-Profit Center Participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program, 62057-62058 [E6-17640]
Download as PDF
62057
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 204
Monday, October 23, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 226
RIN 0584–AD66
For-Profit Center Participation in the
Child and Adult Care Food Program
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
SUMMARY: This rule adopts without
change the interim rule, published on
July 27, 2005, which added a provision
to the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP) regulations
authorizing for-profit centers providing
child care or outside-school-hours care
to participate based on the income
eligibility of 25 percent of children in
care for free or reduced price meals.
This provision, which has been
available nationwide through annual
appropriation acts since December 2000,
was permanently established by the
Child Nutrition and WIC
Reauthorization Act of 2004. This rule
permits the ongoing participation of forprofit centers in the CACFP based on
the income eligibility of children in care
for free or reduced price meals.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith Churchill or Minh Pham, Child
Care and Summer Section, Policy and
Program Development Branch, Child
Nutrition Division, Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22302, phone (703)
305–2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Why Was the Interim Rule Published?
An interim rule on the participation
of for-profit centers in the CACFP was
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:14 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
published on July 27, 2005 (70 FR
43259). The interim rule was issued in
response to Section 119(a) of the Child
Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act
of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–265), which
amended section 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the
Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act (NSLA) (42 U.S.C.
1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) to permanently
authorize for-profit centers that provide
child care or outside-school-hours care
to participate in the CACFP if 25
percent of the children in care are
eligible for free or reduced price meals
under the Program.
This criterion provides an additional
means by which for-profit centers may
qualify for Program participation. Forprofit centers in all States have been
permitted to participate in the Program
since December 2000, when a provision
of Public Law 106–554, added Section
17(a)(2)(B)(i) to the NSLA, 42 U.S.C.
1766(a)(2)(B)(i). That time-limited
provision was subsequently renewed
annually until made permanent by
Public Law 108–265 on June 30, 2004.
Prior to December 2000, the Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) implemented
separate but similar authority in section
17(p) of the NSLA, 42 U.S.C. 1766(p),
permitting for-profit centers in three
States (Kentucky, Iowa, and Delaware)
to participate in the Program. Section
119(a)(2) of Public Law 108–265 struck
this provision. As a result of the
permanent statutory provision affecting
for-profit centers, these States were
notified that the pilot projects were
eliminated and their affected for-profit
centers were incorporated into regular
for-profit Program participation under
section 17(a)(2)(B)(i).
This authority differs from that in
section 17(a)(2)(B)(ii) (42 U.S.C.
1766(a)(2)(B)(ii)), which permits forprofit centers providing child care or
outside-school-hours care to participate
in the CACFP if they receive
compensation from the State title XX
funds and if at least 25 percent of the
enrolled children or the licensed
capacity (whichever is less) receive
benefits under title XX of the Social
Security Act. This criterion was
established by Public Law 101–147,
which reauthorized child nutrition
programs in November 1989, and is
located at section 17(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the
NSLA.
This final rule adopts the definition of
‘‘For-profit center’’ in § 226.2, which
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
was added to the CACFP regulations by
the interim rule. This definition
describes the eligibility criteria
pertaining to for-profit centers serving
children and adults. All other changes,
which were made by the interim rule
and are adopted by this final rule, stem
from this new definition of for-profit
center. These changes consist primarily
of name changes in which the new term
‘‘For-profit center’’ is substituted for
‘‘Proprietary title XIX center’’ or
‘‘Proprietary title XX center’’.
What Comments Were Received on the
Interim Rule?
We did not receive any comments on
the interim rule.
II. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant and was not reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with
regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5
U.S.C. 601–612). Roberto Salazar,
Administrator for the Food and
Nutrition Service, has certified that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This final rule
implements a statutory change that
permanently authorizes for-profit
centers to participate in the Child and
Adult Care Food Program on the basis
of income eligibility of 25 percent of
children in care for free or reduced price
meals. This provision has been available
to for-profit centers as an eligibility
criterion for participation in the
Program since FY 2001. Since the
provision is not new, the Food and
Nutrition Service estimates that the
permanent designation of this eligibility
criterion will not substantially increase
the number of for-profit centers that
may apply to participate in the Program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA,
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
62058
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the Department generally must prepare
a written statement, including a cost/
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
Department to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly,
more cost-effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) that
impose costs on State, local, or tribal
governments or to the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
This rule is, therefore, not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The Child and Adult Care Food
Program is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under No.
10.558. For the reasons set forth in the
final rule in 7 CFR part 3015, Subpart
V and related Notice published at 48 FR
29114, June 24, 1983, this program is
included in the scope of Executive
Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact
of their regulatory actions on State and
local governments. Where such actions
have federalism implications, agencies
are directed to provide a statement for
inclusion in the preamble to the
regulation describing the agency’s
considerations in terms of three
categories called for under section
(6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132.
FNS has considered the impact of this
rule on State and local governments and
has determined that this rule does not
have federalism implications. This final
rule does not impose substantial or
direct compliance costs on State and
local governments. Therefore, under
Section 6(b) of the Executive Order, a
federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is intended to have
preemptive effect with respect to any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies which conflict with its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:14 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
provisions or which would otherwise
impede its full implementation. This
rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect unless so specified in the Dates
paragraph of the rule. Prior to any
judicial challenge to the provisions of
this rule or the application of its
provisions, all applicable administrative
procedures must be exhausted. In the
Child and Adult Food Care Program, the
administrative procedures are set forth
at 7 CFR 226.6(k), which establishes
appeal procedures and 7 CFR 226.22
and 7 CFR parts 3016 and 3019, which
address administrative appeal
procedures for disputes involving
procurement by State agencies and
institutions.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this final rule in
accordance with the Department
Regulation 4300–4, ‘‘Civil Rights Impact
Analysis,’’ to identify and address any
major civil rights impacts the rule might
have on minorities, women, and persons
with disabilities. After a careful review
of the rule’s intent and provisions, FNS
has determined that there is no negative
effect on these groups. All data available
to FNS indicate that protected
individuals have the same opportunity
to participate in the CACFP as nonprotected individuals. Regulations at 7
CFR 226.6(f)(1) require that CACFP
institutions agree to operate the Program
in compliance with applicable Federal
civil rights laws, including title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the
Education amendments of 1972, Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and
the Department’s regulations concerning
nondiscrimination (7 CFR Part 15, 15a,
and 15b). At 7 CFR 226.6(m)(1), State
agencies are required to monitor CACFP
institution compliance with these laws
and regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; see 5 CFR 1320)
requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) approve all
collections of information by a Federal
agency from the public before they can
be implemented. Respondents are not
required to respond to any collections of
information unless it displays a current
valid OMB control number. The rule
does not contain any information
collection requirements subject to
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
E-Government Act Compliance
FNS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 226
Accounting, Aged, Day care, Food
assistance programs, Grant programs,
Grant programs—health, American
Indians, Individuals with disabilities,
Infants and children, Intergovernmental
relations, Loan programs, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Surplus
agricultural commodities.
PART 226—CHILD AND ADULT CARE
FOOD PROGRAM
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 226, which was
published at 70 FR 43259 on July 27,
2005, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E6–17640 Filed 10–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–06–051]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Saugus River, Lynn and Revere, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
temporarily changed the drawbridge
operation regulations that govern the
operation of the General Edwards SR1A
Bridge, mile 1.7, across the Saugus
River, between Lynn and Revere,
Massachusetts. This temporary final
rule allows the bridge to remain in the
closed position from November 1, 2006
through April 30, 2007. This action is
necessary to facilitate structural
maintenance at the bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective from
November 1, 2006 through April 30,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–06–051) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 204 (Monday, October 23, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62057-62058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17640]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 62057]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 226
RIN 0584-AD66
For-Profit Center Participation in the Child and Adult Care Food
Program
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adopts without change the interim rule, published on
July 27, 2005, which added a provision to the Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP) regulations authorizing for-profit centers providing
child care or outside-school-hours care to participate based on the
income eligibility of 25 percent of children in care for free or
reduced price meals. This provision, which has been available
nationwide through annual appropriation acts since December 2000, was
permanently established by the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization
Act of 2004. This rule permits the ongoing participation of for-profit
centers in the CACFP based on the income eligibility of children in
care for free or reduced price meals.
DATES: This final rule is effective November 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Churchill or Minh Pham, Child
Care and Summer Section, Policy and Program Development Branch, Child
Nutrition Division, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, phone (703) 305-2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Why Was the Interim Rule Published?
An interim rule on the participation of for-profit centers in the
CACFP was published on July 27, 2005 (70 FR 43259). The interim rule
was issued in response to Section 119(a) of the Child Nutrition and WIC
Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-265), which amended section
17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act
(NSLA) (42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) to permanently authorize for-profit
centers that provide child care or outside-school-hours care to
participate in the CACFP if 25 percent of the children in care are
eligible for free or reduced price meals under the Program.
This criterion provides an additional means by which for-profit
centers may qualify for Program participation. For-profit centers in
all States have been permitted to participate in the Program since
December 2000, when a provision of Public Law 106-554, added Section
17(a)(2)(B)(i) to the NSLA, 42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i). That time-
limited provision was subsequently renewed annually until made
permanent by Public Law 108-265 on June 30, 2004. Prior to December
2000, the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) implemented separate but
similar authority in section 17(p) of the NSLA, 42 U.S.C. 1766(p),
permitting for-profit centers in three States (Kentucky, Iowa, and
Delaware) to participate in the Program. Section 119(a)(2) of Public
Law 108-265 struck this provision. As a result of the permanent
statutory provision affecting for-profit centers, these States were
notified that the pilot projects were eliminated and their affected
for-profit centers were incorporated into regular for-profit Program
participation under section 17(a)(2)(B)(i).
This authority differs from that in section 17(a)(2)(B)(ii) (42
U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(ii)), which permits for-profit centers providing
child care or outside-school-hours care to participate in the CACFP if
they receive compensation from the State title XX funds and if at least
25 percent of the enrolled children or the licensed capacity (whichever
is less) receive benefits under title XX of the Social Security Act.
This criterion was established by Public Law 101-147, which
reauthorized child nutrition programs in November 1989, and is located
at section 17(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the NSLA.
This final rule adopts the definition of ``For-profit center'' in
Sec. 226.2, which was added to the CACFP regulations by the interim
rule. This definition describes the eligibility criteria pertaining to
for-profit centers serving children and adults. All other changes,
which were made by the interim rule and are adopted by this final rule,
stem from this new definition of for-profit center. These changes
consist primarily of name changes in which the new term ``For-profit
center'' is substituted for ``Proprietary title XIX center'' or
``Proprietary title XX center''.
What Comments Were Received on the Interim Rule?
We did not receive any comments on the interim rule.
II. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant and was not
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in conformance with
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Roberto Salazar,
Administrator for the Food and Nutrition Service, has certified that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This final rule implements a statutory change
that permanently authorizes for-profit centers to participate in the
Child and Adult Care Food Program on the basis of income eligibility of
25 percent of children in care for free or reduced price meals. This
provision has been available to for-profit centers as an eligibility
criterion for participation in the Program since FY 2001. Since the
provision is not new, the Food and Nutrition Service estimates that the
permanent designation of this eligibility criterion will not
substantially increase the number of for-profit centers that may apply
to participate in the Program.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under Section 202 of the UMRA,
[[Page 62058]]
the Department generally must prepare a written statement, including a
cost/benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule,
section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Department to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, more cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) that impose costs on State, local,
or tribal governments or to the private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year. This rule is, therefore, not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The Child and Adult Care Food Program is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.558. For the reasons set forth
in the final rule in 7 CFR part 3015, Subpart V and related Notice
published at 48 FR 29114, June 24, 1983, this program is included in
the scope of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local officials.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires Federal agencies to consider the
impact of their regulatory actions on State and local governments.
Where such actions have federalism implications, agencies are directed
to provide a statement for inclusion in the preamble to the regulation
describing the agency's considerations in terms of three categories
called for under section (6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132. FNS has
considered the impact of this rule on State and local governments and
has determined that this rule does not have federalism implications.
This final rule does not impose substantial or direct compliance costs
on State and local governments. Therefore, under Section 6(b) of the
Executive Order, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have preemptive effect with
respect to any State or local laws, regulations, or policies which
conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full
implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect
unless so specified in the Dates paragraph of the rule. Prior to any
judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the application of
its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures must be
exhausted. In the Child and Adult Food Care Program, the administrative
procedures are set forth at 7 CFR 226.6(k), which establishes appeal
procedures and 7 CFR 226.22 and 7 CFR parts 3016 and 3019, which
address administrative appeal procedures for disputes involving
procurement by State agencies and institutions.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this final rule in accordance with the Department
Regulation 4300-4, ``Civil Rights Impact Analysis,'' to identify and
address any major civil rights impacts the rule might have on
minorities, women, and persons with disabilities. After a careful
review of the rule's intent and provisions, FNS has determined that
there is no negative effect on these groups. All data available to FNS
indicate that protected individuals have the same opportunity to
participate in the CACFP as non-protected individuals. Regulations at 7
CFR 226.6(f)(1) require that CACFP institutions agree to operate the
Program in compliance with applicable Federal civil rights laws,
including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the
Education amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and the Department's
regulations concerning nondiscrimination (7 CFR Part 15, 15a, and 15b).
At 7 CFR 226.6(m)(1), State agencies are required to monitor CACFP
institution compliance with these laws and regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; see 5 CFR
1320) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve
all collections of information by a Federal agency from the public
before they can be implemented. Respondents are not required to respond
to any collections of information unless it displays a current valid
OMB control number. The rule does not contain any information
collection requirements subject to approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
E-Government Act Compliance
FNS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 226
Accounting, Aged, Day care, Food assistance programs, Grant
programs, Grant programs--health, American Indians, Individuals with
disabilities, Infants and children, Intergovernmental relations, Loan
programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus
agricultural commodities.
PART 226--CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 7 CFR part 226, which was
published at 70 FR 43259 on July 27, 2005, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E6-17640 Filed 10-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P