Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery, Framework Adjustment 42; Monkfish Fishery, Framework Adjustment 3, 62156-62196 [06-8811]
Download as PDF
62156
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 060606150–6240–02; I.D.
053106A]
RIN 0648–AT24
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery,
Framework Adjustment 42; Monkfish
Fishery, Framework Adjustment 3
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
SUMMARY: This final rule implements
Framework Adjustment (FW) 42 to the
Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) and FW 3 to
the Monkfish FMP (Joint Framework).
FW 42, developed by the New England
Fishery Management Council (Council),
is a biennial adjustment to the NE
Multispecies FMP that sets forth a
rebuilding program for Georges Bank
(GB) yellowtail flounder and modifies
NE multispecies fishery management
measures to reduce fishing mortality
rates (F) on six other groundfish stocks
in order to maintain compliance with
the rebuilding programs of the FMP. FW
42 also modifies and continues specific
measures to mitigate the economic and
social impacts of Amendment 13 to the
FMP and to allow harvest levels to
approach optimum yield (OY).
DATES: The emergency rule published
on April 13, 2006 (71 FR 19348), that
was extended by a temporary rule
published on October 6, 2006 (71 FR
59020), which is scheduled to expire on
April 4, 2007, is instead superseded by
this final rule and expires at 12:01 a.m.
on November 22, 2006. The
amendments in this final rule become
effective at 12:02 a.m. on November 22,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of FW 42 and FW 3,
the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA), and the Environmental
Assessment (EA) are available from Paul
J. Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council,
50 Water Street, The Tannery, B-Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950.
The FRFA consists of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
public comments and responses, and
the summary of impacts and alternatives
contained in the Classification section
of the preamble of this final rule. Copies
of the small entity compliance guide are
available from Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Northeast Regional Office, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930–2298. A copy of the EA/RIR/
FRFA is accessible via the Internet at
https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/
com.html.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection of information requirements
contained in this final rule may be
submitted in writing to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES), or to David Rostker, OMB,
by e-mail at
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax
at (202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas W. Christel, Fishery Policy
Analyst, (978) 281–9141, fax (978) 281–
9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Amendment 13, implemented on
April 27, 2004 (69 FR 22906), brought
the FMP into conformance with
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requirements,
including measures to end overfishing
and rebuild all overfished groundfish
stocks. In addition, Amendment 13
established a biennial FMP adjustment
process that requires the Council to
review the fishery periodically using the
most current scientific information
available, recommend target total
allowable catches (Target TACs), and
recommend to the Regional
Administrator any changes to
management measures necessary to
achieve the goals and objectives of the
FMP.
A proposed rule was published on
July 26, 2006 (71 FR 42522), that
included a detailed description of the
biennial adjustment process, the August
2005 regional peer-review of stock
assessment updates (GARM II; Northeast
Fisheries Science Center Reference
Document 05–13) completed for the 19
stocks managed under the FMP,
proposed management measures, and
timing issues related to the Joint
Frameworks. Below is a brief summary
of information published in the
proposed rule.
The Council’s Plan Development
Team (PDT) performed an evaluation of
the fishery based upon the results of
GARM II and other available
information. The primary goal of the
PDT review was to determine the stocks
for which an adjustment in management
measures is required in order to ensure
that the current F levels are consistent
with the F’s required under the
rebuilding plans for overfished stocks
managed under the FMP. Based on the
information from GARM II and catch
data, the PDT estimated F’s for those
stocks in need of reductions for calendar
year (CY) 2005 (F2005), a time period
during which the fishery operated under
only one suite of regulations
(Amendment 13). Specifically, the PDT
utilized available information for a
portion of CY 2005, projected landings
for the remainder of the year (based on
current and historic information), and
then estimated the F for the entire CY
(F2005).
To determine which of the 19
groundfish stocks were being fished at
F’s that were not in compliance with the
Amendment 13 rebuilding target F’s, the
PDT compared the required F for 2006
to estimated F2005 for each stock. The
PDT determined that, with one
exception (GB yellowtail flounder), if
F2005 exceeded the Amendment 13 target
F for 2006, adjustment of management
measures was necessary. These
comparisons indicated that F2005 for
some groundfish stocks was less than
that estimated for 2004 (F2004), but still
higher than the 2006 target F (F2006)
specified in the rebuilding program
established under Amendment 13. The
groundfish stocks in need of additional
F reductions to achieve the Amendment
13 F targets for fishing year (FY) 2006
are: Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod; Cape Cod
(CC)/GOM yellowtail flounder;
Southern New England (SNE)/MidAtlantic (MA) yellowtail flounder; SNE/
MA winter flounder; GB winter
flounder; and white hake (see Table 1
below).
TABLE 1.—F REDUCTIONS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FY 2006 AMENDMENT 13 F TARGETS
Stock
F2004
GOM Cod ...................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
0.58
Estimated
F2005
Amendment 13
F2006
0.37
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
0.23
F reduction
necessary
(%)
32
62157
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—F REDUCTIONS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE FY 2006 AMENDMENT 13 F TARGETS—Continued
Stock
F2004
CC/GOM Yellowtail Flounder ....................................................................................
SNE/MA Yellowtail Flounder .....................................................................................
SNE/MA Winter Flounder ..........................................................................................
GB Winter Flounder ...................................................................................................
White Hake ................................................................................................................
Amendment 13
F2006
Estimated
F2005
0.75
0.99
0.38
1.86
1.18
0.48
0.58
0.35
NA
NA
0.26
0.26
0.32
1.0*
1.03
F reduction
necessary
(%)
46
55
9
46
13
*Amendment 13 did not establish a 2006 F target for GB winter flounder. Rather, Amendment 13 established the value of Fmsy as 0.32. However, because model estimates of relative F rate are more precise than estimates of actual F rates, GARM II presented the estimate of F rate for
2004 in relative terms. The threshold value for the relative F rate (F2004/Fmsy) for GB winter flounder is 1.0.
NA: An estimate of F2005 for the stocks of GB winter flounder and white hake could not be developed because the assessments are index
based. The necessary F reductions are based upon F2004.
In addition to responding to the most
recent information regarding F, the
proposed measures were intended to
continue and modify the management
regime implemented by Amendment 13
and subsequent framework adjustments
(FW 40–A, FW 40–B, and FW 41), and
to replace measures implemented under
Secretarial emergency authority at the
beginning of FY 2006 (May 1, 2006,
through April 30, 2007). The Council
originally developed FW 42 with the
intention of implementing the
management measures on May 1, 2006
(the start of FY 2006), as specified by
Amendment 13, and as required by the
regulations. However, due to a delay in
completion of FW 42 and the need to
reduce F on specific groundfish stocks
by the start of FY 2006, NMFS
implemented emergency management
measures (71 FR 19348; April 13, 2006)
that went into effect on May 1, 2006,
until such time that approved FW 42
measures could be implemented. This
rule supercedes the emergency rule, and
the regulatory text in this final rule is
written to amend the regulations in 50
CFR part 648 as they appeared prior to
implementation of the emergency rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Disapproved FW 42 Measure
FW 42 proposed that the Regional
Administrator be given authority to
adjust trip limits upward to facilitate
harvest of the Target TACs, if it were
projected that less than 90 percent of the
Target TAC would be caught during the
FY. Trip limit changes would have been
allowed at any time during the FY, or
before the start of the FY, if information
was sufficient to make the necessary
projections. This measure was
disapproved, as explained below,
because it is inconsistent with National
Standard 2 and section 303(a)(8) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
This proposed measure would have
expanded the Regional Administrator’s
authority to increase trip limits for six
stocks (the regulations already provide
authority for the Regional Administrator
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
to modify the haddock trip limit): GOM
cod, GB cod, white hake, GB winter
flounder, CC/GOM yellowtail flounder,
and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder.
Administratively, this measure is
problematic in that data on the catch
amount and location of affected stocks
are not available on a real-time basis
and, depending upon the size of the
TAC and the rate of harvest, there
would likely not be enough information
to make an accurate projection. To
monitor these stocks, NMFS would need
to rely on Vessel Trip Report (VTR) data
and dealer landings data to make
projections and, although such data
provide some useful information,
sufficient information on both catch
amount and catch location would not be
available on a real-time basis.
Furthermore, the composition of Target
TACs for three of the affected stocks
(GOM cod, CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder, and SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder) also include discard data and/
or recreational data, which also would
not be available on a real-time basis.
Because of the lack of sufficient realtime data for a number of stocks to
accurately monitor catch of particular
species within the fishery, the data
available to implement this measure
would not constitute the best available
scientific information, as required by
National Standard 2. In addition,
section 303(a)(8) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that an FMP
specify the nature and extent of
scientific data needed for the effective
implementation of the FMP. Because of
the limitations of existing data sources,
without additional real-time reporting
requirements to provide reliable and
timely catch and discard data from both
the commercial and recreational sectors,
NMFS does not have sufficient real-time
data to implement this provision.
Therefore, this measure is not consistent
with National Standard 2 or the
required provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act and NMFS has disapproved
it.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Approved Joint Framework Measures
NMFS has approved the remainder of
the measures proposed in the Joint
Frameworks. A description of these
approved measures follows.
1. Recreational Restrictions
Under this final rule, private
recreational vessels and vessels fishing
under the charter/party regulations of
the NE Multispecies FMP are prohibited
from possessing or retaining any cod
from the GOM Regulated Mesh Area
(RMA) from November 1–March 31.
Also, the minimum size of cod for
private recreational vessels and charter/
party vessels fishing in the GOM is
increased from 22 inches (56 cm) to 24
inches (61 cm). Private recreational and
charter/party vessels may transit the
GOM RMA with cod caught from
outside this area, provided all bait and
hooks are removed from fishing rods
and all cod are stored in coolers or ice
chests. These measures are designed to
achieve a reduction in F for GOM cod
caught by the recreational sector that is
similar to the F reduction required of
the commercial sector. The gear and cod
stowage requirements are necessary to
enforce these measures.
2. GB Yellowtail Flounder Rebuilding
Plan
This final rule approves the FW 42
rebuilding plan for GB yellowtail
flounder, whereby GB yellowtail
flounder will be rebuilt from its current
stock size to the biomass that can
produce maximum sustainable yield
(MSY) (Bmsy) using an adaptive strategy
that rebuilds the stock by 2014 with
approximately a 75-percent probability
of success. Under the adaptive strategy,
the maximum F on the stock through
2008 will be set at Fmsy (0.25), and
subsequent changes to F required to
complete rebuilding by 2014 (Frebuild)
will be developed in the 2009 biennial
adjustment required by the FMP. This
rebuilding strategy and 2014 timeline
was selected by the Council to be
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62158
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
consistent with the rebuilding timelines
for most of the stocks in the FMP, and
to take into account uncertainty
regarding the assessment of the stock.
This rebuilding strategy is consistent
with the management strategy agreed to
under the U.S. cooperative management
agreement with Canada.
3. Target TACs
Target TACs are approved through
this rule pursuant to § 648.90(a)(2),
which requires the Council to develop
new Target TACs, based upon the most
recent scientific information, as part of
the biennial adjustment process. Thus,
this final rule approves the Target TACs
for all groundfish stocks for FY 2006,
2007, and 2008. The following Target
TACs in Table 2 were developed by the
Council’s PDT and were calculated from
projections of future catches, using
recent assessment data and the
Amendment 13 target F’s. It is important
to note that during the public comment
period for this action, it was determined
that an incorrect F rate was used in the
calculation of Target TACs for American
plaice for FY 2006–2008. This error
resulted in over-estimating the Target
TAC that would achieve the rebuilding
F targets for these years, but does not
require a change in management
measures needed to achieve the
rebuilding objectives of this action. The
Target TACs for American plaice in
Table 2 reflect the corrected Target
TACs.
TABLE 2.—APPROVED TARGET TACS FOR 2006 THROUGH 2008
[Mt, live weight]
Species
Stock
2006
Cod ....................................................................................
GB ................................................
GOM .............................................
GB ................................................
GOM .............................................
GB ................................................
SNE/MA ........................................
CC/GOM .......................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
GB ................................................
GOM .............................................
SNE/MA ........................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
North .............................................
South ............................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
7,458
5,146
49,829
1,279
2,070
146
650
2,781
5,511
1,424
................
2,481
1,946
2,056
12,005
389
173
38
NA
Haddock ............................................................................
Yellowtail flounder .............................................................
American plaice ................................................................
Witch flounder ...................................................................
Winter flounder ..................................................................
Redfish ..............................................................................
White hake ........................................................................
Pollock ...............................................................................
Windowpane flounder .......................................................
Ocean pout .......................................................................
Atlantic halibut ...................................................................
2007
2008
9,822
11,855
10,020
10,491
103,329
121,681
1,254
1,229
see footnote
213
312
1,078
1,406
3,243
4,135
5,075
4,331
1,604
1,782
see footnote
3,016
3,577
2,075
2,167
1,676
1,367
12,005
12,005
389
389
166
159
38
38
NA
NA
Composition
E*
C*
E
A
D*
B*
B*
B*
A*
A*
C
C*
A
E*
E
A
A
A
NA
A = Commercial Landings.
B = Commercial Landings and Discards.
C = Commercial Landings, Discards, and Recreational Harvest.
D = Commercial Landings and Discards (U.S. portion of U.S./Canada TAC).
E = Commercial Landings (U.S. and Canada).
*For Stocks of Concern: Incidental TAC is a subset of Target TAC.
GARM II did not develop a TAC for GOM winter flounder because of uncertainties in the assessment.
Note, proposed TACs for GB cod and GB haddock include Canadian landings.
GB yellowtail flounder TACs are hard TACs, which are determined annually and cannot be specified in advance.
2006 GB yellowtail flounder TAC was implemented on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25095).
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
4. Incidental Catch TACs
The values of Incidental Catch TACs
for FY 2006 through 2008 are
implemented through this final rule
pursuant to the regulations at
§ 648.85(b)(5), which require the
Council to develop new Incidental
Catch TACs based upon the most recent
scientific information, as part of the
biennial FMP adjustment process.
Although Incidental Catch TACs for
2006 were specified in FW 41, this
action modifies definitions of the
Incidental Catch TACs with respect to
the Target TACs, modifies the allocation
of Incidental Catch TACs among Special
Management Programs, and specifies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
values of all Incidental Catch TACs,
based upon the most recent scientific
information (GARM II). As noted above,
an error was discovered in the
calculation of Target TACs for American
plaice that resulted in over-estimating
the Target TACs, and, therefore, the
Incidental Catch TACs for this species.
The corrected Incidental Catch TACs for
American plaice are listed in Table 3
below.
In addition to the actions described
above that relate to the Incidental Catch
TACs for the eight stocks of concern
noted above, this final rule defines GB
yellowtail flounder and GB winter
flounder as additional stocks of concern,
defines the size of the Incidental Catch
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
TACs (with respect to the Target TACs)
that are likely to be caught in the
Special Management Programs, specifies
Incidental Catch TAC values for FYs
2006 through 2008, and allocates the
Incidental Catch TACs among Special
Management Programs.
This final rule clarifies the
relationship between Target TACs and
Incidental Catch TACs; that is,
Incidental Catch TACs are considered as
a subset of the pertinent Target TACs
(rather than as amounts in excess of the
Target TACs). This clarification is
intended to increase the utility of Target
TACs as a tool used to evaluate the
effectiveness of the management
measure.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
62159
TABLE 3.—DEFINITION OF INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS (PERCENT) AND SPECIFICATION OF TARGET TACS FOR FY 2006
THROUGH 2008 (MT)
Percentage of
total target TAC
Stock of concern
GB cod ........................................................................................................................................
GOM cod ....................................................................................................................................
GB yellowtail flounder .................................................................................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder .......................................................................................................
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder ........................................................................................................
American plaice ..........................................................................................................................
Witch flounder .............................................................................................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder .............................................................................................................
GB winter flounder ......................................................................................................................
White hake ..................................................................................................................................
Two
One
Two
One
One
Five
Five
One
Two
Two
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
2006
2007
122.6
49.9
41.4
6.5
1.5
139
275.6
24.8
28.5
41.1
(*)
99.0
(*)
10.8
2.1
162.1
253.8
30.2
32.1
33.5
2008
(*)
103.9
(*)
14.1
3.1
206.7
216.6
35.6
35.6
27.3
*Note: GB cod and GB yellowtail flounder TACs are determined annually and cannot be estimated in advance.
TABLE 4.—ALLOCATION OF INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS AMONG CATEGORY B DAYS-AT-SEA (DAS) PROGRAMS
[Shown as a percentage of the Incidental Catch TAC]
Regular B DAS
program
Stock of concern
GOM cod .........................................................................................................................
GB cod .............................................................................................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder ............................................................................................
American plaice ...............................................................................................................
White hake .......................................................................................................................
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder .............................................................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder ..................................................................................................
Witch flounder ..................................................................................................................
GB yellowtail flounder ......................................................................................................
GB winter flounder ...........................................................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
5. Default DAS Allocations
Amendment 13 established two
‘‘default’’ measures that would
automatically reduce F on multiple
groundfish species, for American plaice
and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder,
beginning in FY 2006, unless certain
criteria are met. Because these criteria
have not been met, the Amendment 13
default DAS measure (a change in the
Category A and B DAS ratio from 60:40
to 55:45) for FY 2006–2008 remains
unchanged. This default measure
represents an 8.3-percent reduction in
the number of allocated Category A
DAS. This final rule also modifies the
default differential DAS counting
measure in the SNE RMA, as described
in Section 8 of this preamble.
6. Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
Requirement
All limited access NE multispecies
DAS vessels using a groundfish DAS
must be equipped with an approved
VMS that meets the requirements of
§ 648.9. As of the effective date of this
rule, it is illegal for a limited access NE
multispecies DAS vessel to begin a
fishing trip under a groundfish DAS
without an approved VMS. A vessel
owner with a limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit who does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
intend to and does not fish any
groundfish DAS during the FY is
allowed to renew the vessel’s limited
access permit without having an
approved VMS, but may not fish any of
the vessel’s groundfish DAS for that FY.
A vessel owner that is not already
equipped with an approved VMS must
provide pertinent information (e.g., type
of VMS unit, installation date, dealer,
etc.) to NMFS prior to beginning a NE
multispecies fishing trip after the
effective date of this final rule. NMFS is
sending letters to all limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit holders in
order to provide detailed information on
the procedures pertaining to VMS
purchase, installation, and use. If a
vessel is subject to multiple, conflicting
VMS regulations of different programs,
the most restrictive requirement applies.
For example, a vessel fishing in both the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area and in one of
the Differential DAS Areas (described in
Sections 7 and 8 of this preamble) on
the same trip is subject to the VMS
restrictions that pertain to both
programs (e.g., the requirement to
declare into the Differential DAS Areas
prior to leaving port or prior to leaving
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area and the
reporting requirements for the Eastern
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Closed area I
hook gear
haddock SAP
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
50
Eastern U.S./
Canada haddock
SAP
NA
16
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
34
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
50
50
U.S./Canada Area specified at
§ 648.85(a)(3)(v)).
Despite a mandatory VMS
requirement, NE multispecies DAS
vessels are still required to declare
periods out of the fishery (spawning
block out and Day Gillnet vessel blocks
out) through the Interactive Voice
Response (IVR) call-in system. The
Regional Administrator may authorize
limited access NE multispecies vessels
to utilize the IVR system in lieu of the
VMS system for the administration of
DAS requirements should a vessel’s
VMS become inoperable. In addition, if
a vessel’s VMS is not operational, the
Regional Administrator may require
vessels to obtain a Letter of
Authorization (LOA) as an alternate
method of enforcing a possession limit.
7. Differential DAS Counting in GOM
Under this final rule, all NE
multispecies Category A DAS used by a
vessel that has declared (through VMS,
or other means approved by the
Regional Administrator), prior to
leaving the dock, that it will be fishing
within the GOM Differential DAS Area
during any portion of its trip, with the
exception noted below for a Day gillnet
vessel, will be charged at a rate of 2:1,
regardless of area fished. The GOM
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62160
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Differential DAS Area (defined at
§ 648.82(e)(2)(i)(A) of the regulatory text
portion of this document), includes
most of the area west of 69°30′ W. long.
and between 41°30′ and 43°30′ N. lat.
(between approximately Monomoy
Island, MA, and Portland, ME). Day
gillnet vessels will be charged DAS at a
rate of 2:1 for the actual hours used for
any trip of less than 3 hr in duration,
and for any trip of greater than 7.5 hr.
For Day gillnet trips between 3 and 7.5
hr duration, vessels will be charged a
full 15 hr. To illustrate how DAS are
charged in the GOM Differential DAS
Area for different categories of vessels,
the following examples are provided. A
trawl vessel that has declared into the
GOM Differential DAS Area on a trip
that lasts 10 actual hr would be charged
20 hr (10 hr × 2) of DAS use, regardless
of where the vessel fished. Conversely,
a Day gillnet vessel that has declared
into the GOM Differential DAS Area on
a trip that lasts 5 actual hr would be
charged for 15 hr of DAS use regardless
of where the vessel fished (between 3
and 7.5 hr = 15 hr); a Day gillnet vessel
fishing in the GOM Differential DAS
Area on a trip that lasts 8 actual hr
would be charged for 16 hr of DAS use
regardless of where the vessel fished (8
hr × 2). On any trip in which a vessel
declares, prior to leaving the dock, that
it will be fishing in the GOM
Differential DAS Area under a Category
A DAS, the vessel will be charged at the
differential DAS rate for the entire
fishing trip, even if only a portion of the
trip is spent fishing in the GOM
Differential DAS Area. A vessel may not
fish under a Category A DAS in the
GOM Differential DAS Area, unless it
has declared into this area prior to the
start of the trip, or unless exempted, as
described below. A vessel that does not
declare its intent to fish in the GOM
Differential DAS Area may still transit
or be in the area, provided its fishing
gear is properly stowed according to the
regulations and, if the vessel is in the
area for reasons other than transiting
(e.g., to evade bad weather), the vessel
immediately notifies NMFS that it is
within the GOM Differential DAS Area,
but not fishing through its VMS. This
provision has been modified from the
proposed rule, which allowed nonfishing and non-transiting vessels to be
in the area ‘‘due to bad weather, or other
circumstances beyond its control,’’
based on Council comment and to
ensure effective enforcement of this
provision.
No changes to the Monkfish FMP
regulations are implemented to
accommodate the NE multispecies
Differential DAS rules, but the following
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
is an explanation of how the proposed
groundfish regulations would work with
the current Monkfish FMP regulations.
A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish Category C or D permit that
has declared into the GOM Differential
DAS Area under a monkfish DAS
(thereby using both a monkfish and NE
multispecies DAS) will have its NE
multispecies DAS charged at a rate of
2:1, but its monkfish DAS will continue
to be charged at a rate of 1:1. The
regulations will continue to allow a
monkfish Category C and D vessel to
fish under a monkfish-only DAS, when
groundfish DAS are no longer available,
to ensure that it can fish its full
allocation of monkfish DAS. Monkfish
Category C and D vessels that accrued
monkfish-only DAS under the recent
emergency regulations as a result of the
use of NE multispecies DAS at the
differential rate of 1.4 to 1 will be able
to continue to use such monkfish only
DAS under this final rule, during the
remainder of this FY. Under this final
rule, vessels fishing under a monkfishonly DAS will continue to be required
to fish under the provisions of the
monkfish Category A or B permit. Such
a vessel is limited to monkfish-only
DAS equal to its net monkfish DAS
allocations (including carry-over DAS)
minus its net NE multispecies Category
A DAS allocation (including carry-over
DAS). A monkfish vessel will continue
to be allocated ‘‘monkfish only’’ DAS
based upon its current allocations of
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS.
This allocation is not expanded to
account for the effects on monkfish DAS
due to the differential DAS measures
implemented by this final rule. For
example, if a Category C monkfish
vessel allocated 40 monkfish DAS has a
current NE multispecies DAS allocation
of 15 DAS, the maximum number of
monkfish-only DAS that the vessel
would be able to fish would be 25 DAS
(40 monkfish DAS ¥ 15 NE
multispecies DAS). However, for a
vessel fishing under differential DAS,
the overall amount of monkfish DAS
that could be used is effectively reduced
because the NE multispecies DAS are
used at the differential rate. Using the
example above, if the vessel fished all
15 NE multispecies DAS at the
differential DAS rate, the vessel would
use up its allocation of NE multispecies
DAS after 7.5 days of actual time fished
(7.5 days × 2.0 = 15 DAS). Therefore,
even though the vessel only fished 7.5
actual NE multispecies DAS, it would
be able to fish only up to 25 of its
monkfish DAS as ‘‘monkfish-only’’
DAS.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
For a vessel that has declared into the
GOM Differential DAS Area, trip limits
apply based on the actual days spent
fishing, and not on the basis of the
differential DAS that were charged for
the trip. The cod possession limit rule
that requires vessels to ‘‘run the clock’’
to fully account for each daily limit of
cod caught does not apply to trips
charged at the differential DAS rate (for
both GOM and GB cod). For example, if
the trip of a vessel declared into the
GOM Differential DAS Area lasts for 25
hr actual time, the vessel would be
allowed to catch twice the daily limit of
GOM cod (800 lb (362.9 kg) per DAS),
and would be charged 50 hr of DAS.
Because differential DAS apply only to
Category A DAS, a vessel that begins
and ends its trip in the GOM Differential
DAS Area under the Regular B DAS
Program is not subject to the differential
DAS counting and is subject to the DAS
counting rules of the Regular B DAS
Program.
A vessel that fishes inside and outside
of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the
same trip (as described in section 15 of
this preamble) may also fish in the GOM
Differential DAS Area on the same trip,
provided the vessel declares its intent to
fish in the GOM Differential DAS Area
via VMS prior to leaving the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area. A vessel that has
declared into both the GOM Differential
DAS Area and the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip will be subject to
the most restrictive DAS counting, trip
limits, and reporting requirements
applicable to the two areas for the entire
trip.
The GOM Differential DAS
restrictions are designed to reduce F on
GOM/CC yellowtail flounder, GOM cod,
and white hake.
8. Differential DAS Counting in SNE
All NE multispecies Category A DAS
used by a vessel that has declared
(through VMS, or other means approved
by the Regional Administrator), prior to
leaving the dock, that it will be fishing
within the SNE Differential DAS Area
during any portion of its trip, with the
exception noted below, will be charged
at a rate of 2:1 when fishing in a specific
portion of the SNE RMA. A vessel may
not fish, except as noted below, under
a Category A DAS in the SNE
Differential DAS Area, unless it has
declared into the area prior to the start
of the trip. The SNE Differential DAS
Area (defined at § 648.82(e)(2)(i)(B) in
the regulatory text portion of this
document) is an irregular-shaped
offshore area extending from 73°40′ W.
long., east to 69°30′ W. long. (from south
of western Long Island to north of the
Nantucket Lightship Closed Area). On
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
any trip in which a vessel declares,
prior to leaving the dock, via its VMS
unit, that it will be harvesting fish in the
SNE Differential DAS Area under a
Category A DAS, the vessel will be
charged at the differential DAS rate for
that portion of the trip spent in the SNE
Differential Area (as determined from
VMS positional data). The time spent
outside this area will be charged at the
rate of 1:1. For example, if a trawl vessel
declares into the SNE Differential DAS
Area through its VMS unit on a trip that
lasts 12 actual hr with only 4 hr actually
spent in the SNE Differential DAS Area,
the total DAS deducted for that trip
would equal 16 hr (8 hr of actual time
outside the SNE Differential DAS Area
plus 8 hr (4 hr × 2) of differential DAS
time). A Day gillnet vessel that declares
into the SNE Differential DAS Area
through VMS will be charged according
to the following formula for the actual
time spent in the SNE Differential DAS
Area: For hours accrued in the area less
than 3 hr or greater than 7.5 hr, vessels
will be charged at a rate of 2:1; for hours
accrued in the area between 3 and 7.5
hr, vessels will be charged a full 15 hr.
The DAS accrued outside of the SNE
Differential DAS Area will accrue on a
1:1 basis. For example, if a Day gillnet
vessel declared into the SNE Differential
DAS Area on a trip that lasts 12 actual
hours with only 5 hr actually spent in
the SNE Differential DAS Area, the total
DAS deducted for that trip would be 22
hr (7 hr of actual time outside of the
SNE Differential DAS Area, plus 15 hr
according to the above formula). For
trips where a Day gillnet vessel declares
into the SNE Differential DAS Area, the
application of the DAS accrual formula
described above does not supersede the
DAS accrual formula that applies to all
NE multispecies Day gillnet vessels. In
other words, the net DAS charge for a
Day gillnet vessel for a trip declared into
the SNE Differential DAS Area may not
be less than the DAS that would accrue
on the same length trip by a Day gillnet
vessel not declared into the SNE
Differential DAS Area.
If the Regional Administrator requires
the use of the IVR or other non-VMS
reporting system, a vessel fishing for
any portion of its trip in the SNE
Differential DAS Area will be charged at
the rate of 2:1 for the entire trip, in a
manner similar to that described for
differential DAS counting in the GOM
Differential DAS Area (see section 7 of
this preamble). Because it is not
possible to determine the amount of
time a vessel fishes inside the SNE
Differential DAS Area using IVR or IVR
technology, the vessel must be charged
at the differential rate for the entire trip.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Further, if a vessel fishes in both the
GOM and SNE Differential DAS Area on
the same trip, the vessel will be charged
at the rate of 2:1 for the entire trip.
Similar to fishing in the GOM
Differential DAS Area, a vessel issued a
limited access monkfish Category C or D
permit that has declared into the SNE
Differential DAS Area under a monkfish
DAS (and therefore is accruing both
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS)
will have its NE multispecies DAS
charged at a rate of 2:1, as described
above, and its monkfish DAS charged at
a rate of 1:1.
A vessel that does not declare its
intent to fish in the SNE Differential
DAS Area under a Category A DAS, may
still transit or be in the area, provided
its fishing gear is properly stowed,
according to the applicable regulations,
and if the vessel is not in the area for
transiting purposes, it immediately
notifies NMFS through its VMS that it
is in the SNE Differential DAS Area, but
not fishing. This provision has been
modified from the proposed rule, which
allowed non-fishing and non-transiting
vessels to be in the area ‘‘due to bad
weather, or other circumstances beyond
its control,’’ based on Council comment
and to ensure effective enforcement of
this measure.
Similar to how trip limits are counted
when fishing in the GOM Differential
DAS Area, for trips declared into the
SNE Differential DAS Area, all trip
limits apply based on the actual days
spent fishing, and not on the basis of the
number of DAS charged. A vessel that
begins and ends a fishing trip under the
Regular B DAS Program is not be subject
to differential DAS counting, regardless
of where it fishes.
A vessel that fishes inside and outside
of the U.S./Canada Management Area on
the same trip (as described in section 15
of this preamble) may also fish in the
SNE Differential DAS Area on the same
trip, provided the vessel declares its
intent to fish in the SNE Differential
DAS Area via VMS prior to leaving the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area. A vessel that
has declared into both the SNE
Differential DAS Area and the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on the same trip will
be subject to the more restrictive DAS
counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements applicable to the two areas
for the entire trip.
The SNE Differential DAS restrictions
are designed to reduce F on SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder, SNE winter
flounder, and white hake.
9. Commercial Trip Limits
This final rule does not change the
Amendment 13 GOM cod trip limit (800
lb (362.9 kg) per DAS, up to 4,000 lb
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62161
(1,818.2 kg) per trip). This final rule
implements new trip limits for white
hake and GB winter flounder, modifies
the existing trip limits for the three
yellowtail flounder stocks (CC/GOM,
GB, and SNE/MA), and modifies the
haddock trip limit and the GOM cod
trip limit exemption and cod overage
regulations.
A NE multispecies DAS vessel fishing
under Category A DAS, or any other
vessel subject to the NE multispecies
possession and trip limit regulations,
may land up 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of white
hake per DAS, or any part of a DAS, up
to 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) per trip, unless
otherwise restricted. A NE multispecies
DAS vessel fishing under a Category A
DAS that has declared into the U.S./
Canada Management Area, or any other
vessel subject to the NE multispecies
possession and trip limit regulations,
may land up to 5,000 lb (2,268.1 kg) of
GB winter flounder and 10,000 lb
(4,536.2 kg) of GB yellowtail flounder
per trip, unless otherwise restricted. The
U.S./Canada Management Area is
defined as the same geographic area as
the GB winter flounder and the GB
yellowtail flounder stock areas.
NE multispecies DAS vessels fishing
under Category A DAS, or any other
vessel subject to the NE multispecies
possession and trip limit regulations,
may land up to 250 lb (113.6 kg) per
DAS, or any part of a DAS, up to 1,000
lb (453.6 kg) per trip of CC/GOM or
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder for the
entire FY. Because the trip limits for
CC/GOM and SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder are the same, this final rule
removes the requirement that vessels
obtain and possess on board a yellowtail
flounder LOA issued by the Regional
Administrator in order to land
yellowtail flounder from the CC/GOM or
SNE/MA Yellowtail Flounder Areas.
This final rule expands the Regional
Administrator’s authority to modify the
GB yellowtail flounder trip limit,
removes the requirement that NMFS
impose a GB yellowtail flounder trip
limit when 70 percent of the TAC is
reached, and removes the threshold
harvest levels of 30 percent and 60
percent before other management
measures can be adjusted. Instead, this
final rule implements an initial GB
yellowtail flounder trip limit of 10,000
lb (4,536.2 kg) per trip and allows the
Regional Administrator to make
adjustments to the GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit at any time during
the FY, and to eliminate or adjust the
initial 10,000-lb (4,536.2–kg) trip limit
before the start of the FY, in order to
prevent exceeding or in order to
facilitate harvesting the GB yellowtail
flounder TAC, in a manner consistent
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62162
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
with the Administrative Procedure Act,
as more fully described under Section
22 of this preamble. If no trip limit is
specified for the beginning of a FY, the
10,000–lb (4,536.2–kg) yellowtail
flounder trip limit will remain in effect.
The Regional Administrator may specify
a yellowtail flounder trip limit for all of
the U.S./Canada Management Area or
for either of its two sub-areas (i.e., the
Western U.S./Canada Area or the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area). This final
rule also recognizes non-binding
guidance developed by the Council to
assist the Regional Administrator
regarding potential in-season
modifications to the GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit. Table 5 contains
catch thresholds and associated trip
limits offered as non-binding Council
guidance for consideration.
TABLE 5.—GB YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER TRIP LIMIT ADJUSTMENT GUIDANCE
If catch is projected to reach
30% of the TAC during the
specified quarter, the
suggested trip limit is as
follows:
FY quarter
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
1
2
3
4
(May–July) ..................................................
(August–October) .......................................
(November–January) ..................................
(February–April) ..........................................
This final rule eliminates the current
initial haddock trip limit provision
(May–Sept 3,000 lb (1,360.8 kg) per DAS
up to 30,000 lb (13,608 kg) per trip; Oct–
Apr 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) per DAS up to
50,000 lb (22,680 kg) per trip) and as
more fully described under Section 22
of this preamble, the automatic trip
limit reduction for Eastern GB haddock
(1,500 lb (680.4 kg) per DAS or up to
15,000 lb (6,804.1 kg) per trip) when 70
percent of the TAC is projected by the
Regional Administrator.
The requirement for NE multispecies
DAS vessels to obtain a GB Cod Trip
Limit Exemption LOA from the Regional
Administrator when fishing outside of
the GOM RMA, if the vessel operator
desires to be exempt from the more
restrictive cod trip limit in the GOM, is
eliminated because this law
enforcement tool is no longer necessary.
Instead, with the exception of vessels
declared into the U.S./Canada
Management Area, a NE multispecies
DAS vessel fishing south of the GOM
RMA must declare through the VMS,
prior to leaving the dock in accordance
with instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator, its intent to fish
south of the GOM RMA in order to be
subject to the less restrictive GB cod trip
limits. Such a vessel is exempt from the
GOM cod landing limit, but may not
fish in the GOM RMA for the duration
of the trip. Such a vessel may transit the
GOM RMA, provided that its gear is
properly stowed while in the GOM
RMA. A vessel that has not declared
through VMS that it will be fishing
south of the GOM RMA, is subject to the
most restrictive applicable cod trip
limit, regardless of area fished for the
entire trip.
The Regional Administrator retains
the authority to require a vessel to
obtain a GOM Cod Trip Limit
Exemption LOA (as under pre-FW 42
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
7,500 lb (3,402.1 kg) .................................................
10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) ...............................................
25,000 lb (11,340.4 kg) .............................................
Remove trip limits ......................................................
regulations), if NMFS’s administration
of the VMS program is not operational.
If an LOA is required, such a vessel may
not fish north of the exemption area for
a minimum of 7 consecutive days (when
fishing under the NE multispecies DAS
program), and must carry the LOA on
board.
For a vessel that is not declared into
and does not fish in either of the two
differential DAS areas and that catches
cod in excess of the GOM or GB cod trip
limits (i.e., the vessel possesses up to 1
extra day’s worth of cod in relation to
the amount of DAS that have elapsed),
the current requirement for vessels to
‘‘run’’ their clocks upon entering port
(to account for the amount of cod on
board) is replaced by a requirement to
make a declaration via VMS prior to
crossing the VMS demarcation line. For
a vessel making this VMS declaration,
NMFS will make the appropriate
increase to the DAS accrued (up to 23
hours and 59 minutes) to round up the
next 24-hr increment of DAS.
10. Regular B DAS Program
This final rule renews the Regular B
DAS Program, but modifies certain
aspects in order to further reduce the
potential risks associated with the use of
a Regular B DAS and to minimize
impacts to the monkfish fishery. The
program will no longer be characterized
as a ‘‘Pilot,’’ and will remain in effect
indefinitely.
The Regular B DAS Program allows
limited access NE multispecies DAS
vessels with an allocation of Regular B
DAS to fish under a Regular B DAS in
order to harvest relatively healthy
groundfish stocks (GB haddock, pollock,
redfish, GOM winter flounder, and
GOM haddock). GB winter flounder and
GB yellowtail flounder are now
considered ‘‘stocks of concern’’ that
require additional reductions in F.
PO 00000
If catch is projected to reach
60% of the TAC during the
specified quarter, the
suggested trip limit is as
follows:
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3,000 lb (1,360.9 kg).
5,000 lb (2,268.1 kg).
10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg).
25,000 lb (11,340.4 kg).
Vessels eligible to fish in the Regular B
DAS Program may not fish in this
program and in a Special Access
Program (SAP) (e.g., the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP, Closed Area (CA)
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, or CA II
yellowtail flounder SAP) on the same
trip. In order to limit the potential
biological impacts of the program, only
500 Regular B DAS may be used during
the first quarter of the CY (May through
July), while 1,000 Regular B DAS may
be used in subsequent quarters (August
through October, November through
January, and February through April).
DAS that are not used in one quarter
will not be available for use in
subsequent quarters. As implemented
previously under FW 40–A, Regular B
DAS will accrue at the rate of 1 DAS for
each calendar day, or part of a calendar
day, fished.
A vessel participating in this program
must be equipped with an approved
VMS and must notify the NMFS
Observer Program at least 72 hr in
advance of a trip in order to facilitate
observer coverage. This notification
requires reporting of the following
information: The general area or areas
that will be fished (GOM, GB, or SNE),
vessel name, contact name for
coordination of observer deployment,
telephone number of contact, date, time,
and port of departure. Providing notice
of the area that the vessel intends to fish
does not restrict the vessel’s activity to
fish only in that area on that trip, but
will be used to plan observer coverage.
Prior to departing on the trip, the vessel
owner or operator must notify NMFS via
VMS that the vessel intends to
participate in the Regular B DAS
Program. Vessels fishing in the Regular
B DAS Program must report their
catches of certain groundfish stocks of
concern (cod, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder,
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
American plaice, and white hake) and
haddock daily through VMS, including
the amount of fish kept and discarded.
These reporting requirements are
consistent with the standardized
reporting requirements that, as
implemented by this final rule, apply to
all Special Management Programs of the
FMP, as explained in section 17 of this
preamble.
In contrast to the Regular B DAS Pilot
Program, in which a trawl vessel was
not required to utilize any particular
gear type, under this final rule, a trawl
vessel must use an approved haddock
separator trawl when participating in
the Regular B DAS Program. Other trawl
net configurations may be on board the
vessel, provided they are properly
stowed when the vessel is fishing under
the Regular B DAS Program rules. The
intent of this restriction is to further
reduce the potential for vessels to catch
stocks of concern, notably cod,
yellowtail flounder, and winter
flounder. Furthermore, for a trawl vessel
fishing with the proposed haddock
separator trawl, possession of flounders
(all species, combined); monkfish
(whole weight), unless otherwise
specified below; and skates is limited to
500 lb (227 kg) each, and possession of
lobsters is prohibited, to help promote
and ensure the proper utilization of the
haddock separator trawl; a properly
configured haddock separator trawl
should not catch large quantities of
these species.
A vessel fishing under a Category B
DAS while in this program is prohibited
from discarding legal-sized regulated NE
multispecies, Atlantic halibut, ocean
pout, and monkfish, and is limited to
landing 100 lb (45.4 kg) per DAS, or any
part of a DAS, of each of the following
groundfish stocks: GOM cod, GB cod,
GB yellowtail flounder, American
plaice, witch flounder, white hake,
SNE/MA winter flounder, GB winter
flounder, southern windowpane
flounder, and ocean pout, unless further
restricted (see below). In addition, a
vessel fishing in this program is limited
to landing no more than one Atlantic
halibut and 25 lb (11.3 kg) per DAS, or
any part of a DAS, up to a maximum of
250 lb (113 kg) per trip, of CC/GOM or
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder. A limited
access monkfish DAS vessel fishing
with gear other than trawl gear that is
participating in this program under a NE
multispecies DAS is subject to the
monkfish Incidental Catch limit
applicable to the monkfish Incidental
Catch permit (Category E) (i.e., 400 lb
(181.4 kg) tail weight/DAS, or 50
percent of the total weight of fish on
board, whichever is less, when fishing
in the monkfish Northern Fishery
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Management Area (NFMA); and 50 lb
(22.7 kg) tail weight/DAS when fishing
in the monkfish Southern Fishery
Management Area (SFMA)). A limited
access monkfish DAS vessels fishing
with trawl gear that is participating in
this program under a NE multispecies
DAS is subject to the monkfish
Incidental Catch limit applicable to the
monkfish Incidental Catch permit
(Category E), as well as the monkfish
restrictions associated with the required
use of the haddock separator trawl (as
described below). That is, vessels may
not land more than 500 lb (226.8 kg)
whole weight of monkfish per trip when
fishing in the monkfish NFMA; and 500
lb (226.8 kg) whole weight per trip or 50
lb (22.7 kg) tail weight per DAS,
whichever is less, when fishing in the
monkfish SFMA.
If a vessel fishing under the Category
B DAS Program harvests and brings on
board a stock with an Incidental Catch
TAC (cod, yellowtail, American plaice,
witch flounder, white hake, SNE winter
flounder, GB winter flounder), or
southern windowpane flounder, ocean
pout, Atlantic halibut, or monkfish, in
excess of the landing limits, the vessel
operator must retain on board the excess
catch of these species, and immediately
notify NMFS, via VMS, that it is
changing its DAS category from a
Regular B DAS to a Category A DAS
(i.e., ‘‘DAS flip’’). If a vessel flips from
a Regular B DAS to a Category A DAS,
it will be charged Category A DAS,
which will accrue to the nearest minute,
for the entire trip (i.e., not to the nearest
day). Once the vessel flips, it is subject
to the Category A trip limit restrictions.
A vessel fishing in the Category B DAS
Program must abide by all the reporting
requirements described above for the
duration of the trip, even if the vessel
‘‘flips’’ to a Category A DAS.
In order to ensure that a vessel will
always have the ability to flip to a
Category A DAS while fishing under a
Regular B DAS (should it catch a
groundfish species of concern in an
amount that exceeded the trip limit),
with the exception of vessels fishing in
one of the differential DAS areas (as
explained below), the number of
Regular B DAS that may be used on a
trip is limited to the number of Category
A DAS that the vessel has at the start of
the trip. For example, if a vessel plans
a trip under the Regular B DAS Program
and has 5 Category A DAS available, the
maximum number of Regular B DAS
that the vessel could fish on that trip
under the Regular B DAS Program
would be 5. If a vessel is fishing in
either the GOM Differential DAS Area or
the SNE Differential DAS Area, the
number of Regular B DAS that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62163
used on a trip is limited to the number
of Category A DAS that the vessel has
at the start of the trip divided by two.
For example, if a vessel plans a trip
under the Regular B DAS Program and
has 10 Category A DAS available, the
maximum number of Regular B DAS
that the vessel could fish on that trip
under the Regular B DAS Program
would be 5.
This action provides the Regional
Administrator authority to approve the
use of additional gear specifically for
this program, based on approved gear
standards recommended by the Council.
After consideration of the Groundfish
Committee’s recommendation on the
standards that must be met by potential
gears, the Council may determine what
standards, if any, will be recommended
to the Regional Administrator to
facilitate the determination of whether a
proposed gear type is acceptable based
on whether the proposed gear has been
demonstrated to reduce catch of
groundfish stocks of concern. Upon
receipt of the Council’s
recommendation on gear standards,
NMFS may implement these standards
in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act. If NMFS
decides not to implement the Council’s
recommendation on gear standards, it
must provide a written rationale to the
Council regarding its decision not to do
so.
The Pilot Program implemented by
FW 40–A allowed a vessel issued a
limited access monkfish Category C or D
permit to use a NE multispecies Regular
B DAS to fulfill the requirements of the
Monkfish FMP, which requires such a
vessel to use a NE multispecies DAS
every time a monkfish DAS is used. To
reduce fishing mortality on monkfish
resulting from the use of Regular B DAS,
this final rule implements the Monkfish
FW 3 provision prohibiting a limited
access monkfish DAS vessel that also
possesses a limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit from using a
monkfish DAS (in conjunction with a
NE multispecies Regular B DAS) when
participating in the Regular B DAS
Program. This vessel may still
participate in this program and use a NE
multispecies Regular B DAS, but it must
fish under a NE multispecies DAS only
and is subject to the monkfish trip
limits. Discarding of legal-sized
monkfish is prohibited when fishing
under this program.
NMFS will administer the Regular B
DAS Program quarterly DAS cap by
monitoring the total number of Regular
B DAS accrued on trips that begin and
end under a Regular B DAS. Mere
declaration of a Regular B DAS Program
trip through VMS does not reserve a
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62164
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
vessel’s right to fish under this program,
because the vessel must also cross the
demarcation line to begin a trip in this
program. Once the maximum number of
Regular B DAS are projected to be used
in a quarter, the Regional Administrator
will end the Regular B DAS Program for
that quarter. In order to limit the
potential impact of the Regular B DAS
Program on the fishing mortality of
groundfish stocks of concern, a
quarterly Incidental Catch TAC will be
set for certain groundfish stocks of
concern for this program. Based upon
the definition of Incidental Catch TACs
and the allocation of Incidental Catch
TACs among Special Management
Programs (Table 3 and 4, respectively),
the proposed Incidental Catch TACs
allocated to the Regular B DAS Program
are calculated and divided into
quarterly Incidental Catch TACs as
shown in Table 6. The quarterly
Incidental Catch TACs are divided
among quarters in order to correspond
to the allocation of DAS among quarters.
The 1st quarter (May–July) will receive
13 percent of the Incidental Catch TACs,
and the remaining quarters (August–
October, November–January, and
February–April) will each receive 29
percent of the Incidental Catch TACs.
TABLE 6.—INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS FOR THE REGULAR B DAS PROGRAM
[mt, live weight]
FY 2006
Qtr 1
GB cod .....................................................................................................
GOM cod ..................................................................................................
GB yellowtail flounder ..............................................................................
SNE/MA yellowtail ....................................................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail ...................................................................................
American plaice .......................................................................................
Witch flounder ..........................................................................................
White hake ...............................................................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder ..........................................................................
GB winter flounder ...................................................................................
8.0
6.5
2.7
0.2
0.8
18.1
35.8
5.3
3.2
1.9
FY 2007
Qtr 2–4
17.8
14.5
6.0
0.4
1.9
40.3
79.9
11.9
7.2
4.1
Qtr 1
FY 2008
Qtr 2–4
12.9
0.3
1.4
21.1
33.0
4.4
3.9
2.1
Qtr 1
See Note
28.7
13.5
See Note
0.6
0.4
3.1
1.8
47.0
26.9
73.6
28.2
9.7
3.6
8.7
4.7
4.6
2.2
Qtr 2–4
30.1
0.9
4.1
60.0
62.8
7.9
10.4
5.2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Note: TACs for this stock depend on annual specification of TACs in the U.S./Canada Management Area. TACs are calculated using the definition of Incidental Catch TACs and the allocation of Incidental Catch TACs among Special Management Programs (Table 3 and 4, respectively),
as well as the quarterly division of the TAC described above. Separate specification of these TACs is not necessary, because they are calculated
based upon an explicit formula.
With the exception of white hake, CC/
GOM yellowtail flounder, and SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder, if the Incidental
Catch TAC for any one of these species
is caught (landings plus discards)
during a quarter, use of Regular B DAS
in the pertinent stock area will be
prohibited for the remainder of that
quarter. Vessels can once again use
Regular B DAS at the beginning of the
subsequent quarter. When the white
hake Incidental Catch TAC is caught,
the possession of white hake when
fishing under the Regular B DAS
Program will be prohibited. For the CC/
GOM and SNE/MA stocks of yellowtail
flounder, when the respective Incidental
Catch TACs are caught, only a portion
of the stock area where the species is
predominantly caught will be closed to
Regular B DAS Program participants.
Upon attainment of the CC/GOM
yellowtail flounder incidental Catch
TAC, the following 30-minute square
blocks will close: Blocks 98, 114, 123,
124, 125, 132, and 133. Upon attainment
of the SNE/MA yellowtail flounder
Incidental Catch TAC, the following 30minute square blocks will close: Blocks
70 to 73, 82 to 88, 98, 99, and 101 to
103.
Under the Pilot Program, the Regional
Administrator had the authority to
prohibit the use of Regular B DAS for
the duration of a quarter or FY, if it was
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
projected that continuation of the
Regular B DAS Program would
undermine the achievement of the
objectives of the FMP or the Regular B
DAS Program. This final rule continues
this authority, but provides additional
reasons for terminating the program.
Additional reasons for terminating the
program include, but are not limited to,
the following: Inability to restrict
catches to the Incidental Catch TACs;
evidence of excessive discarding;
evidence of a significant difference in
flipping rates between observed and
unobserved trips; and insufficient
observer coverage to adequately monitor
the program, particularly if coverage
declines below the Council’s
recommendation of 36 percent (the
same level of observer coverage as
occurred during the original Pilot
Program).
11. Renewal of DAS Leasing Program
This final rule continues the DAS
Leasing Program, without change, to
help mitigate the economic and social
impacts resulting from the current FMP
regulations that strictly limit fishing
effort.
12. Renewal and Modification of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
This final rule renews and modifies
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
for FY 2006 through 2008 as described
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
below, and no longer characterizes this
SAP as a ‘‘Pilot Program.’’
The Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock
SAP Program allows limited access NE
multispecies DAS vessels fishing with
an authorized haddock separator trawl
to catch haddock using a Category B
DAS, in a portion of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area, including the northernmost tip of CA II. The time period for
the SAP is revised to August 1–
December 31. Delaying the start date
from May 1 to August 1 is intended to
help prevent an early closure of this
area and thereby prolong the period of
time during which vessels have access
to the haddock fishery in the area under
a Category B DAS.
In a manner similar to the provision
proposed under the Regular B DAS
Program, this final rule provides the
Regional Administrator authority to
approve the use of additional gear
specifically for this SAP based on
approved gear standards recommended
by the Council.
This final rule implements new
restrictions for trips on which use of the
haddock separator trawl is required
(including this SAP). For trawl trips,
possession of flounders (all species,
combined); monkfish (whole weight),
unless otherwise specified below; and
skates is limited to 500 lb (227 kg) each
per trip; and possession of lobsters is
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
prohibited to help ensure the proper
utilization of the haddock separator
trawl.
In order to limit the potential impact
on fishing mortality that the use of
Category B DAS may have on GB cod,
an annual GB cod Incidental Catch TAC
is specified for this SAP that represents
34 percent of the overall Incidental
Catch TAC for GB cod (19.6 mt for FY
2006). In addition to an Incidental Catch
TAC for GB cod, this action also
establishes an Incidental Catch TAC for
GB yellowtail flounder and GB winter
flounder for this SAP. The Incidental
Catch TACs for these two species in this
SAP each represent 50 percent of the
respective overall Incidental Catch
TACs for these stocks allocated to
Special Management Programs. The
2006 GB yellowtail flounder Incidental
Catch TAC is 20.7 mt, and the GB
winter flounder Incidental Catch TACs
for 2006–2008 are 14.3, 16.1, and 17.8
mt, respectively. The GB yellowtail
flounder Incidental Catch TAC is
dependent upon the annual
specification of the U.S./Canada TACs,
and therefore will be calculated on an
annual basis for FYs 2007 and 2008.
Separate specification of this Incidental
Catch TAC is not necessary, because it
is calculated based upon an explicit
formula. Participation in the SAP by
vessels using a Category B DAS will be
prohibited when any one of the three
Incidental Catch TACs are projected to
have been caught.
Under this final rule, many of the
reporting requirements for this SAP are
the same as the reporting requirements
that are applicable to all Special
Management Programs, as explained
under Section 17 in this preamble.
Finally, this rule restricts vessels that
are fishing in this SAP while under a
Category B DAS, from discarding
regulated NE multispecies, Atlantic
halibut, and ocean pout. All other
measures for this SAP are consistent
with the measures previously
implemented.
62165
13. Modification to CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP
This final rule specifies a haddock
TAC for the CA I Hook Gear Haddock
SAP for FY 2006 through 2008, and
provides the Regional Administrator the
authority to adjust these TACs based on
future stock assessments using a
specified formula. The formula is based
upon the size of the haddock TAC
allocated for FY 2004 (1,130 mt live
weight) and, based on new information,
will be adjusted according to the
growth/decline of the western GB
(WGB) haddock exploitable biomass in
relationship to its size in 2004. The size
of the WGB component of the stock is
currently considered to be 35 percent of
the total stock size (unless modified by
a new stock assessment). The formula is
as follows: TACyear x = (1,130 mt live
weight) × (Projected WGB Haddock
Exploitable Biomassyear x / WGB
Haddock Exploitable Biomass2004).
TABLE 7.—CA I HADDOCK GEAR HADDOCK SAP TACS FOR FY 2006–2009, AND PERTINENT HISTORIC INFORMATION
Total GB
haddock stock
exploitable
biomass
(mt × 1,000)
FY
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
WGB haddock
exploitable
biomass
(mt × 1,000)
Ratio of total
GB haddock
stock to WGB
component
100.907
137.341
202.261
442.427
560.303
35.317
48.069
70.791
154.849
196.106
N/A
1.361
2.004
4.385
5.553
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
TAC
(mt live
weight)
1,130
1,538
2,265
4,955
6,275
For example for FY 2006, based on the information in the table and the formula: 202.261 × 35% = 70.792; 70.792/35.317 = 2.004; and 1,130 ×
2.004 = 2,265 mt.
When the haddock TAC is projected
to be harvested, the SAP will close. The
standardized reporting requirements as
discussed in Section 17 of this preamble
apply to this SAP.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
14. GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector
This final rule authorizes the
formation of a second sector in the FMP,
the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector (Fixed
Gear Sector), in accordance with the
procedures and requirements
implemented by Amendment 13
(§ 648.87). Requirements under
§ 648.87(b) that apply to all sectors
apply to the Fixed Gear Sector. This
final rule implements a requirement that
the Fixed Gear Sector fish only in the
geographic area defined as the GB Cod
Hook Gear Sector Area, which is that
portion of the GB cod stock area north
of 39°00′ N. lat. and east of 71°40′ W.
long. Because the FW 42 document was
silent with respect to the geographic
area to be associated with the proposed
Fixed Gear Sector, NMFS proposed,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
based on the inferred intent of the
Council, the above geographic area in
the FW 42 proposed rule, due to the fact
that the goals of the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector are very similar the goals of the
GB Cod Hook Gear Sector. However, the
Fixed Gear Sector’s 2006 Operations
Plan has proposed that this area be
expanded. A proposed rule (71 FR
48903, August 22, 2006) soliciting
comment on this Operations Plan is
currently under review. Depending on
the outcome of that proposed
rulemaking, this area could be revised
through a separate final rule.
The primary purpose of the Fixed
Gear Sector is to fish in an efficient
manner, under customized managed
measures, for the primary purpose of
harvesting GB cod. A vessel fishing in
the Fixed Gear Sector is restricted to
fishing with either jigs, non-automated
demersal longline, hand gear, or sink
gillnets. The Fixed Gear Sector, as
required under § 648.87(b)(2), must
submit an Operations Plan and Fixed
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Gear Sector Contract to the Regional
Administrator at least 3 months prior to
the beginning of each FY. As described
above, a vessel fishing in the Fixed Gear
Sector would be restricted to fishing
with various gear, including jigs;
however jigs are not defined in the
regulations. This final rule includes a
definition of jigging and jig as follows:
Jigging, with respect to the NE
multispecies fishery, means fishing for
groundfish with hook and line gear
(hand line or rod and reel) using a jig,
which is a weighted object attached to
the bottom of the line used to sink the
line and/or imitate a baitfish, which is
moved (‘‘jigged’’) with an up and down
motion.
This final rule authorizes the
formation of the Fixed Gear Sector, but
neither approves nor disapproves the
2006 Operations Plan of the Fixed Gear
Sector. Approval or disapproval of the
Fixed Gear Sector’s 2006 Operation Plan
will be announced through publication
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62166
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
of a separate final rule in the Federal
Register.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
15. Eastern U.S./Canada Area Flexibility
This final rule modifies the
regulations to allow a vessel that fishes
in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area to
choose to fish in other areas outside of
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the
same trip, with an exception noted
below. If a vessel chooses to fish both
inside and outside of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area on the same trip, the
operator must notify NMFS via VMS
prior to leaving the dock or at any time
during the trip prior to leaving the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area, and must
comply with the most restrictive DAS
counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements for the areas fished,
regardless of area fished, for the entire
trip. For example, a vessel electing to
fish inside and outside of the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on the same trip will
not receive any steaming time credit,
and all cod, haddock, and yellowtail
flounder caught on the entire trip will
be applied against the pertinent U.S./
Canada Management Area TACs for
these species. In addition, the vessel
must comply with the reporting
requirements for the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area for the entire trip.
A vessel is prohibited from fishing in
the CC/GOM or SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder stock areas if, when fishing in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area, it exceeds
the yellowtail flounder trip limit
specified for these areas (i.e., 250 lb
(113.4 kg)/day to 1,000 lb (453.6 kg)/
trip). Prohibiting a vessel from fishing
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
on the same trip if it has exceeded the
CC/GOM or SNE/MA trip limit for
yellowtail flounder is necessary to
preclude the possibility of a vessel
discarding its yellowtail flounder in
order to fish outside of the area. A
vessel that fishes inside and outside of
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the
same trip may also fish in one of the
Differential DAS Areas (and accrue DAS
at the higher rate) described in Sections
7 and 8 of this preamble, provided the
vessel declares its intent to fish in such
areas via VMS prior to leaving the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area.
16. Modification of the DAS Transfer
Program
This final rule modifies several
aspects of the DAS Transfer Program.
The intent of these changes are to
increase the utility of the program,
provide clarification of program details
that were not previously considered,
and support effective administration of
the program by NMFS. The vessel
transferring its NE multispecies DAS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
permit (transferor) is no longer required
to exit all state and Federal fisheries,
and may acquire other fishing permits
(i.e., other Federal limited access
permits, Federal open access permits,
and/or state permits) after the transfer.
Secondly, other non-groundfish permits
that the transferor vessel has no longer
automatically expire, and may be
transferred as a bundle to the vessel
receiving the NE multispecies DAS
permit (subject to pertinent regulations
regarding vessel replacement). Duplicate
permits must expire, and a vessel may
not consolidate DAS or other allocations
from non-groundfish permits. Nongroundfish permits are subject to all
applicable regulations such as vessel
replacement size restrictions. The
program maintains the conservation tax
of 20 percent on Category A and
Category B DAS, as well as the
conservation tax of 90 percent on
Category C DAS, in order to support the
program’s goal of long-term reduction in
fishing effort.
Because the execution of a DAS
transfer is a process whereby two
limited access NE multispecies permits
(with two baselines, DAS allocations,
and histories) become a single permit
(with a single baseline, DAS allocation,
and history), this action also specifies
the rules that pertain to the resultant
single permit. All history associated
with the transferred NE multispecies
DAS permit is acquired by the recipient
(transferee), and is subsequently
associated with the permit rights of the
transferee. The pertinent history
includes catch history, DAS use history,
and permit rights history. Neither the
individual elements of the history
associated with the transferor vessel,
nor the total history may be separated
from the NE multispecies DAS being
transferred. With respect to vessel
baseline characteristics, the baseline of
the transferee vessel will be the smaller
baseline of the two vessels or, if the
transferee vessel has not previously
upgraded under the vessel replacement
rules, the vessel owner may choose to
adopt the larger baseline of the two
vessels, which would constitute the
vessel’s one-time upgrade, if such
upgrade is consistent with the vessel
replacement rules. For a vessel involved
in a DAS transfer that was granted a
one-time downgrade of its DAS Leasing
Program baseline specifications, as
described in § 648.82(k)(4)(xi), the DAS
leasing specifications would revert to
those specifications prior to the onetime downgrade, except in the case
when the downgrade was made by the
transferee vessel and the transferee’s
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
vessel baseline specifications were
adopted during the DAS transfer.
Because limited access NE
multispecies Hook Gear vessels
(Category D) are not allowed to change
permit categories under current permit
rules, this final rule clarifies that vessels
with a limited access NE multispecies
Category D permit will only be allowed
to transfer their NE multispecies DAS
(acting as a transferor) to another
Category D vessel. However, such
vessels may participate in a DAS
transfer as a transferee vessel and
acquire DAS from any limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit category. That
is, a Category D Hook Gear vessel may
transfer DAS only to another Category D
Hook Gear vessel, but may receive
transferred DAS from any limited access
NE multispecies DAS permitted vessel.
In order to simplify the DAS Transfer
Program, this final rule clarifies that, for
the purposes of calculating the DAS
conservation tax, the transferee vessel
must specify which vessel’s DAS are
being acquired and are, therefore,
subject to the conservation tax. If a
conservation tax were to apply strictly
to the DAS acquired from the transferor
vessel, buyers would have a strong
incentive to arrange the DAS Transfer
Program transaction such that it would
result in the permit with the least
number of DAS being designated as the
transferor (seller) permit. Lastly, this
final rule prohibits a vessel from
participating in the DAS Leasing
Program as a lessee or lessor during a
particular FY and then subsequently
participating in the DAS Transfer
Program as a transferor during the same
FY. A vessel may participate in the DAS
Leasing Program as a lessor or as a
lessee and then submit an application
for a DAS transfer as a transferor, but
the transfer, if approved, will not be
effective until the beginning of the
following FY. Vessels are not prohibited
from participating in the DAS Leasing
Program after a DAS transaction has
occurred.
17. Standardized Requirements for
Special Management Programs
This final rule modifies and
standardizes the requirements that
apply to the Special Management
Programs. The standardized
requirements are described below, and
any new requirement, or new
application of an existing requirement is
noted.
The requirement for the use of VMS
and the advance notice to the observer
program prior to each trip is continued.
For all Special Management Programs,
the species that must be reported daily
(catch and discards) will be haddock
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
and all species for which a stock of
concern has been identified as likely to
be caught in a Special Management
Program (currently, the species with
stocks of concern identified as such are:
Cod, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, white hake,
and American plaice).
For all Special Management Programs,
there is a new requirement for the vessel
operator to report the date of the catch.
The vessel operator may report catch for
a particular day of fishing at any time
of the day on which it was caught, up
until 0900 hr. the following day.
For all Special Management Programs,
there is a new requirement to report the
serial number of the VTR. A vessel
operator must report the serial number
from the first page of the logbook on the
daily VMS catch report. Because the
serial numbers are associated with
individual vessels, a vessel operator is
prohibited from sharing logbooks with
other vessel operators. The VTR serial
number serves as an important tool that
enables fishery managers to make better
use of available data by linking VTR
data with dealer and DAS data.
While participating in SAPs and the
Regular B DAS Program, a vessel is
prohibited from discarding legal-sized
regulated NE multispecies, Atlantic
halibut, and ocean pout while fishing
under a Category B DAS. This final rule
also requires a vessel that is
participating in either the Regular B
DAS Program or a SAP that exceeds any
of the NE multispecies trip limits, to
exit these respective programs. With the
exception of the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP, a vessel must exit the
Special Management Program and ‘‘flip’’
to a Category A DAS as soon as the
maximum trip limit is exceeded. The
requirement that vessels participating in
the Special Management Programs
report daily via VMS continues, even
after a vessel is required to exit the
program.
18. Gear Performance Incentives for
Special Management Programs
In times and areas when a Special
Management Program requires a vessel
to use a haddock separator trawl or
other gear authorized by the program to
reduce catches of stocks of concern,
possession of flounders (all species
combined), monkfish (live/whole
weight), and skates (live/whole weight)
is limited to 500 lb (226.8 kg) each, per
trip, and possession of lobsters is
prohibited. If a specific program
includes a possession limit that
conflicts with these Gear Performance
Incentives, the most restrictive limit
will apply. For example, a vessel fishing
under a NE multispecies Category B
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
DAS in the proposed Regular B DAS
Program in the monkfish SFMA, and
that has a limited access monkfish
Category C or D permit (and is therefore
prohibited from fishing under a
monkfish DAS), is limited to 50 lb (22.7
kg) of monkfish per trip. The intent of
this measure is to increase the incentive
for vessels to configure the gear
properly, because only small amounts of
these species may be landed when using
the gear. This Gear Performance
Incentive requirement applies to the
Regular B DAS Program, NE
multispecies SAPs, and the Eastern
U.S./Canada Management Area (if/when
the haddock separator trawl is the only
allowable trawl net).
19. Modification of Cod Landing Limit
in Eastern U.S./Canada Area
For vessels fishing in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area under a Category A
DAS, this final rule removes the
restriction that the amount of cod not
exceed 5 percent of the total weight of
fish on board.
20. SNE/MA RMA Trawl Codend Mesh
Requirement
The trawl codend mesh requirement
applicable to the SNE/MA RMA is
modified from 6.5-inch (15.2-cm) square
or 7.0-inch (17.8-cm) diamond mesh to
6.5-inch (15.2-cm) square or 6.5-inch
(15.2-cm) diamond mesh.
21. Regional Administrator Authority To
Adjust Measures in the U.S./Canada
Management Area
This final rule expands the Regional
Administrator’s authority to adjust
management measures in the U.S./
Canada Management Area at any time
during the FY, as well as prior to the
start of the FY for the subsequent FY, if
information is sufficient to make the
necessary projections, and after
consultation with the Council, in order
to more effectively prevent
overharvesting or to facilitate harvesting
of the hard TACs (and achieving OY).
This final rule eliminates the required
implementation of a trip limit for
Eastern GB haddock (i.e., when 70
percent of the TAC is projected, the
Regional Administrator must implement
a possession limit of 1,500 lb (680.4 kg)
per day, up to 15,000 lb (6,804.1 kg) per
trip).
This final rule clarifies that the
Regional Administrator may implement
different management measures for
vessels using Category A DAS and
Category B DAS, and requires that the
Regional Administrator, when
determining in-season adjustments,
consider Council intent that
opportunities for fishing on Category A
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62167
DAS should take precedence over
opportunities to fish under Category B
DAS.
Comments and Responses for FW 42
and FW 3
Eighty-three comments were received
during the comment period on the
proposed rule for this action from 61
individuals, 10 fishing industry groups,
1 conservation group, 1 research
institution, 3 shoreside processors, 5
elected officials, and 2 state resource
management agencies (Massachusetts
Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) and
the Maine Department of Marine
Resources (DMR)). Only comments that
were applicable to the proposed
measures, including the analyses used
to support these measures, are
addressed in this preamble. It is
important to note in considering the
responses to comments herein that, in
the context of implementing a
framework adjustment measures such as
FW 42, NMFS may only approve or
disapprove substantive measures, and,
may not unilaterally modify any
measure in a substantive way pursuant
to section 304(a)(3) to the MagnusonStevens Act.
Recreational Restrictions
Comment 1: One commenter
questioned the effectiveness of the
proposed seasonal GOM cod possession
prohibition for the charter/party sector,
as few vessels would be affected by this
measure, suggesting that more effective
measures are necessary. This
commenter also doubted that the
seasonal (i.e., November through March)
cod possession prohibition would affect
private anglers as much as indicated in
the FW 42 document, stating that
weather and vessel size often limit their
ability to fish during this period.
Response: The analysis prepared for
FW 42 indicates that the seasonal GOM
cod possession prohibition, in
conjunction with an increase in the
minimum size for GOM cod, would
achieve the reduction in F for GOM cod
deemed necessary from the charter/
party and private recreational fishing
sector. Therefore, additional
recreational management measures are
not necessary.
GB Yellowtail Flounder Rebuilding Plan
Comment 2: The DMR strongly
supported the proposed GB yellowtail
flounder rebuilding plan due to the high
probability of rebuilding the stock by
2014, especially considering the
negative retrospective patterns observed
in recent biomass and mortality
estimates.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62168
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Response: NMFS agrees and
implements the proposed rebuilding
program through this final rule.
Target TACs
Comment 3: One commenter
suggested that all of the groundfish
Target TACs specified for 2007 and
2008 should be reduced by 50 percent.
Another commenter was concerned that
increased Target TACs in 2007 do not
reflect observed increases in F on
particular stocks since 2004. A third
commenter indicated that the Target
TAC increases in 2007 and 2008 are
overly optimistic and suggested that
NMFS reevaluate Target TACs on a
yearly basis using updated data. Finally,
a fourth commenter cautioned that the
Target TACs should not be reduced too
quickly and that there should be a
mechanism to increase these TACs.
Response: As specified in the EA
prepared for this action, the PDT
estimated F rates for CY 2005 using the
best information available. While
additional preliminary landings data
have become available since the
submission of the FW 42 EA for final
review and the implementation of
emergency measures on May 1, 2006,
these data are not sufficient to
adequately determine whether drastic
changes have occurred in the fishery
that would require revision of the
objectives and measures proposed by
FW 42. Specifically, this preliminary
information is not sufficient to
determine whether the measures
implemented to date during CY 2006,
including the emergency measures,
have, in fact, achieved the necessary F
reductions for specific stocks during CY
2006. Although the analysis prepared
for FW 42 indicates that reductions in
the Target TACs for several species are
necessary, a 50-percent reduction in
Target TACs is not warranted at this
time because only six stocks require F
reductions to maintain the Amendment
13 rebuilding programs. Finally,
Amendment 13 established a process
whereby Target TACs for each species
are established through the Council’s
biennial adjustment process. The next
adjustment is scheduled to be
developed in 2008, and implemented on
May 1, 2009. That adjustment will take
into account the best scientific
information available at the time, and
use that information to determine
whether additional adjustments to F are
necessary.
Comment 4: One commenter
expressed concern that the recent
revelation that an incorrect F rate was
used during the calculation of Target
TACs for American plaice (see
description of approved measure 3
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
above) could affect the determination
whether FW 42 meets the Amendment
13 mortality objectives for 2006. This
commenter suggested that NMFS should
adjust these TACs to prevent
overfishing.
Response: The revised Target TAC
does not alter the determination that the
proposed action meets the mortality
targets for all stocks managed by the
FMP. The most recent stock assessment
(GARM II) and analysis prepared for this
action indicate that American plaice is
achieving the mortality reductions
necessary under the Amendment 13
rebuilding program for this stock
notwithstanding the error in the
calculation of the Target TAC for this
stock. Due to the Amendment 13 default
DAS reductions, as well as other
measures proposed to reduce F for
overfished stocks, the FW 42 analysis
indicates that F on American plaice will
be reduced by an additional 11 percent
which is expected to constrain landings
from exceeding the revised Target TAC
specified in this final rule.
Default DAS Allocations
Comment 5: Five commenters
supported the Amendment 13 default
DAS allocation reductions proposed to
be continued through FW 42. However,
six commenters asserted that this
default measure is unnecessary because
the triggers for this measure have not
been met, as F for American plaice is
below the Amendment 13 target F rate
for 2006 and existing measures for SNE/
MA yellowtail flounder already reduce
F on this species to comply with the
Amendment 13 rebuilding program.
These commenters suggest that an
evaluation of completed FY 2005 and
preliminary 2006 data would further
support this assertion. One commenter
pointed out that Alternatives 1–5 were
analyzed without the default DAS
reduction measure and they still met the
necessary F reductions for this action.
One commenter opposed the suggestion
in the proposed rule that the default
DAS reduction was necessary for white
hake.
Response: The regulations
implementing Amendment 13
established three criteria to determine
whether the default measures are
necessary; these criteria are specified in
the current regulations at § 648.82(d)(4):
(1) Target stocks (SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder and American plaice) are
projected to be at the target biomass in
the year the measures are to be
implemented, and, overfishing is not
occurring; or (2) biomass estimates show
rebuilding is on track and the best
available estimate of the fishing
mortality rate for these stocks meets the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
target FMSY, and (3) all other stocks that
would be affected by the default
measures are meeting their target F
rates. Based on the results of GARM II
and updated information reflecting the
estimated F rate for these stocks in CY
2005, American plaice meet both the
first and the second criteria. However,
the third criterion for eliminating the
default measures is not satisfied because
the target F rates are not being achieved
for five other stocks that would be
subject to the default measures. Because
the stock area defined for American
plaice includes the stock areas of all
other stocks managed by the FMP, the
default measures, in conjunction with
other measures proposed in FW 42, are
still needed to reduce F on other stocks
caught within the broadly defined
American plaice stock area. Further, in
2006, SNE/MA yellowtail flounder is
not projected to achieve its target
biomass, is not meeting the target F rate,
and, therefore, continues to experience
overfishing. Any new data available at
this time is still preliminary and
insufficient to change the approved FW
42 measures.
It is true that Alternatives 1–5
considered by the Council in FW 42 did
not include the Amendment 13 default
DAS reduction, yet still achieved the
necessary F reductions for this action.
However, in order to achieve the
necessary F reductions for this action,
these alternatives required a greater
reduction in the overall DAS allocation
than the Amendment 13 default
measure. For example, Alternative 5
proposed a 40-percent reduction in
allocated Category A DAS by reducing
the Category A:B DAS allocation ratio to
36:64 rather than the 55:45 allocation
ratio of the default measure. In other
words, these alternatives would have
resulted in a greater overall reduction in
available Category A DAS than the
Amendment 13 default measure to
achieve the necessary F reductions for
this action.
According to analysis prepared for
this action, the Amendment 13 default
DAS reduction, as demonstrated by the
analysis of the No Action alternative,
will reduce F on SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder by 46.6 percent and white hake
by 2.5 percent. However, F on these
stocks must be reduced by 55 percent
and 13 percent, respectively, to
maintain the Amendment 13 rebuilding
programs for these stocks. As a result,
the default measures alone are
insufficient to achieve the necessary F
reductions for these stocks. Therefore,
the additional measures included in this
final rule, as proposed in FW 42, are
needed in order to maintain the
Amendment 13 rebuilding programs for
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
these and other stocks. Further, the EA
prepared for FW 42 indicates that
additional F reductions beyond the
measures proposed in this action and
the subsequent Amendment 13 default
measures scheduled for implementation
in 2009 may be necessary to fully
rebuild these stocks by the end of the
rebuilding programs for these stocks.
The Council had the opportunity to
revise the Amendment 13 default
measures and did so by choosing to
revise the differential DAS counting rate
for SNE/MA yellowtail flounder to
achieve the necessary F reduction for
this stock. Because the Council chose
not to revise the Amendment default
DAS reduction, and because criteria to
eliminate this default measure were not
met, the default DAS reduction will
remain effective upon implementation
of this final rule. Measures proposed by
FW 42, combined with the default DAS
reduction, are expected to achieve the
necessary F reductions for several
groundfish stocks to maintain the
Amendment 13 rebuilding programs.
VMS Requirement
Comment 6: Seven commenters
supported the mandatory VMS
requirement proposed by FW 42,
recommending that FW 42 be
implemented before September 30,
2006, to ensure reimbursement for the
purchase of VMS units outlined in a
recent notice in the Federal Register (71
FR 41425, July 21, 2006). One
commenter indicated that a mandatory
VMS requirement would facilitate the
development of future area-specific
measures. However, three commenters
suggested that a VMS requirement offers
little benefit to the industry and
recommended deferring implementation
unless the differential DAS counting
rate is reduced.
Response: The increasing complexity
of the management measures
implemented or proposed by FW 42,
including area-specific regulations such
as differential DAS counting and realtime reporting requirements, necessitate
an increased reliance on VMS to
accurately and efficiently monitor vessel
operations under the FMP. A mandatory
VMS requirement for vessels fishing
under a NE multispecies DAS allows
NMFS to accurately count DAS used in
the proposed differential DAS counting
areas and monitor catch from Special
Management Programs. Without the use
of VMS, NMFS would be hindered in
effectively administering many of the
measures proposed in FW 42, or any of
the existing Special Management
Programs. Many of these programs
provide at least some means of
mitigating recent effort reductions in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
fishery by facilitating the use of
Category B DAS and access to SAPs
within closed areas. In addition,
because a vessel’s DAS charge only
starts once a vessel crosses the VMS
demarcation line, rather than at the
dock, as under the previous call-in
system, a mandatory VMS requirement
also provides some benefit to the fishing
industry by reducing the DAS charged
on most fishing trips.
Comment 7: One commenter
requested that NMFS implement a
power-down mechanism for periods
when groundfish vessels participate in
other non-VMS regulated fisheries. This
commenter suggested a minimum
participation period of 30 days to
facilitate enforcement of this provision.
Response: Although the Council did
not consider modifying the existing
VMS power-down provision or
implementing a new VMS power-down
provision, NMFS does not support the
commenter’s request because it would
compromise efforts to enforce proposed
and existing regulations by preventing
NMFS from monitoring vessel activity
away from the dock.
Differential DAS Counting in GOM
Comment 8: Six commenters
indicated that the proposed GOM
Differential DAS Area restrictions are
unjustified, that they do not strike a
balance between conservation and
economics, and that such restrictions
will result in economic failure of the
fishing industry; while eight other
commenters expressed general
opposition to this proposed measure
and the economic impacts that it will
cause.
Response: As discussed in further
detail in the responses below, NMFS
believes the GOM Differential DAS
Counting Area is consistent with all of
the National Standards, including
National Standards 1 (measures shall
prevent overfishing and achieve OY), 2
(measures shall be based on the best
scientific information available), 4
(measures shall not discriminate among
fishermen), 8 (measures shall minimize
economic impacts to the extent
practicable), and 10 (measures shall
promote safety to the extent
practicable). The National Standards
indicate that management measures
shall minimize adverse economic
impacts to fishing communities to the
extent practicable, provided the
measures meet the conservation
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. Analysis prepared for this action
indicates that the GOM Differential DAS
Area is necessary to achieve the
required F reductions for GOM cod and
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder. In
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62169
addition, this analysis also indicates
that this measure is part of the
alternative that results in the least
decrease in fishing revenue compared to
the other alternatives considered by the
Council for this action, while still
achieving the F targets necessary to
meet the rebuilding objectives of the
FMP. As a result, this measure achieves
not only the necessary conservation
objectives of this action, but it also
minimizes the economic impacts to
fishing communities, thereby achieving
the economic and social objectives of
this action and balancing, to the extent
possible and practicable, the
requirements of the National Standards.
Comment 9: Nine commenters
suggested that the GOM Differential
DAS Area is too big and would exceed
the necessary F reductions for both
GOM cod and CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder. Six of these commenters
suggested that the area should not
extend beyond 70 ° W. long. (an area
that would include approximately 70
percent of the landings of GOM cod and
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder), as
landings from 30′ squares 115, 116, 123,
138, and 139 account for very little of
the F for these stocks.
Response: The proposed size of the
GOM Differential DAS Area is necessary
to achieve the required F reductions for
both GOM cod and CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder based on the analysis of the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center’s
Closed Area Model (CAM). Although
catch from additional blocks identified
by the commenters is low, it is expected
that fishing effort would increase in
these blocks, should differential DAS
counting be limited to a smaller area
within the GOM. The Council
considered another alternative that
included differential DAS counting
within a smaller area of the GOM, but
chose to adopt the larger area contained
in the preferred Alternative B2
(modified) because the proposed area
included a more substantial portion of
the GOM cod and CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder landings (approximately 85
percent of the landings from both
stocks) and would effectively achieve
the conservation objectives of this
action when combined with the other
proposed measures. Because the GOM
Differential DAS Counting Area
recommended by the commenters was
not analyzed during the development of
FW 42, it is uncertain whether this area
would achieve the necessary F
reductions for this action.
Comment 10: Eight commenters
requested that NMFS only charge DAS
at the differential counting rate of 2:1
when vessels are actually fishing within
the GOM Differential DAS Area,
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62170
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
suggesting that the regulations
governing vessel operations in this area
should mirror those for the SNE/MA
Differential DAS Area.
Response: Unlike the SNE/MA
Differential DAS Area, the GOM
Differential DAS Area is situated along
the coast and vessels must transit
through this area to return to port.
During the development of FW 42,
Council members expressed concern
that vessels may elect to ‘‘top off’’ their
trips by fishing within this area on their
return to port if there were no
differential DAS rate in effect. This
would greatly undermine the
effectiveness of this measure, as detailed
in an example provided in Section 4.2.2
of the EA prepared to support FW 42.
Charging DAS at the differential rate for
the entire trip minimizes incentives to
circumvent the intention of the GOM
Differential DAS Area and increases the
effectiveness of this measure towards
reducing F and achieving the rebuilding
objectives for GOM cod and CC/GOM
yellowtail flounder by reducing effort in
the inshore GOM.
Comment 11: Thirteen commenters
argued that the proposed GOM
Differential DAS Area compromises
safety of fishing vessels by forcing
vessels to fish farther offshore to avoid
the higher DAS charge, thereby violating
National Standard 10.
Response: The EA prepared for this
action considered issues relating to
safety within the alternatives
considered. Of the alternatives
considered in FW 42, including a
minimum 24-hr DAS charge and more
extensive DAS reductions for all vessels,
the proposed action is described as
being the best option for achieving the
necessary conservation objectives of the
action while having the least negative
impact on vessel safety. In terms of
practicability, this alternative is
estimated to have the least reduction in
revenues which, in turn, is thought to
have the least impact on vessel safety.
NMFS acknowledges that the GOM
Differential DAS Area may influence
vessels to fish farther offshore. However,
the safe operation of a fishing vessel is
ultimately the responsibility of the
master of the vessel. FW 42 proposes a
provision that allows vessels to be
within the GOM Differential DAS Area
without being charged DAS at the
differential rate, provided the vessel
notifies NMFS that it is not fishing and
the gear is properly stowed. This
provision will allow vessels fishing
outside of the GOM Differential DAS
Area to seek the safety of coastal waters
should weather conditions deteriorate
and was intended to mitigate the
impacts to safety from the proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
GOM Differential DAS Area without
compromising the conservation
objectives of this measure. As a result,
the Council and NMFS have determined
that the measure promotes safety to the
extent practicable, as specified in
National Standard 10.
Comment 12: Five commenters
supported the proposed provision that
would allow vessels to be within the
GOM Differential DAS Area without
being charged DAS at the differential
rate, provided the vessel notifies NMFS
that it is in the area and that the gear
is properly stowed.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Council that it is important to allow
vessels to be within the GOM
Differential DAS Area without being
charged DAS at the differential rate to
minimize safety concerns associated
with the size of the differential DAS
Area (see response to Comment 10
above) and has approved this provision.
This final rule also implements a similar
provision in the SNE/MA Differential
DAS Area.
Comment 13: Four commenters
suggested that the differential DAS
counting measure was never intended to
reduce F for white hake. These
commenters argued that the proposed
trip limits for this stock are sufficient to
achieve the necessary F reductions for
this species, while another commenter
indicated that such F reductions have
already taken place, based on 2005/2006
catch data. Two commenters supported
the proposed trip limit for white hake.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that,
according to the EA prepared for FW 42,
the proposed GOM Differential DAS
Area was not intended to specifically
reduce F on white hake. However, the
GOM Differential DAS Area is an
integral component of a suite of
measures necessary to achieve the
necessary F reduction for this species
and other species caught in conjunction
with white hake. This suite of
alternatives was selected as part of a
targeted approach to reduce F on
specific stocks, in specific areas,
without unnecessarily reducing catch of
other healthier stocks by imposing
across-the-board reductions in DAS
allocations included in five of the other
alternatives considered in FW 42.
Further, because the white hake stock
area encompasses the stock areas of all
other stocks managed by the FMP,
measures necessary to reduce F on other
overfished stocks, such as the GOM
Differential DAS Area, also contribute
towards achieving the necessary F
reductions for white hake. The primary
analytical tool used to evaluate the
impacts of the proposed measures (i.e.,
the CAM) takes into consideration all of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the proposed measures, including both
the white hake trip limit and differential
DAS counting. As a result, it is
impossible to attribute the expected F
reductions resulting from one specific
measure from the CAM results, as vessel
behavior is influenced by all of the
proposed measures combined.
Therefore, all of these measures,
including differential DAS counting in
the GOM, are necessary to maintain the
Amendment 13 rebuilding program for
this species, as well as other overfished
stocks.
It is possible that the emergency
management measures implemented by
the April 13, 2006, emergency interim
final rule could reduce F for white hake
more than is necessary for the entire FY
2006. However, data regarding the
realized effectiveness of the emergency
measures are not available at this time
and were not available at the time FW
42 was submitted by the Council for
final review by NMFS. Even assuming
that the emergency measures resulted in
reducing F for white hake more than is
required for 2006, similar reductions in
F would not be realized during FY 2007
and 2008, because the emergency
measures are superceded by this final
rule. As a result, differential DAS
counting in the GOM, in addition to the
Amendment 13 default DAS reduction
and the trip limits in FW 42 are
necessary to achieve the necessary F
reductions for white hake for the
expected duration of this action (i.e.,
through 2009). Because white hake is
overfished and overfishing is still
occurring, a precautionary approach
potentially resulting in a greater
reduction in F for white hake than is
necessary in FY 2006 is consistent with
the National Standard 1 guidelines at
§ 600.310(f)(5), and would increase the
likelihood that these stocks would meet
the Amendment 13 rebuilding
objectives.
Comment 14: Eight commenters stated
that the proposed differential DAS
counting measure in the GOM is
inconsistent with National Standard 4
because it denies reasonable access to
healthy groundfish stocks for vessels
operating out of ports in Massachusetts
and New Hampshire, and discriminates
against such vessels by
disproportionally imposing the
conservation burden on these states.
Five of these commenters argued that
this measure is also inconsistent with
National Standard 8 because it does not
provide for the sustained participation
by fishing communities in
Massachusetts and New Hampshire and
does not minimize economic impact, as
vessels cannot afford to lease DAS if
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
fishing within the GOM Differential
DAS Area.
Response: The proposed GOM
Differential DAS Area applies to any
vessel intending to fish under a NE
multispecies DAS in this area,
regardless of principal port or home
port. Area-specific measures such as
this are necessary if the management
strategy in FW 42 is to selectively
reduce F on overfished stocks, while
facilitating greater access to healthier
stocks in an attempt to help achieve OY
in the fishery. As detailed further in the
response to Comment 15 below,
differential DAS counting in the inshore
GOM is necessary to achieve the
necessary F reductions for GOM cod
and CC/GOM yellowtail flounder and to
maintain the Amendment 13 rebuilding
programs for these stocks. Vessels that
fish primarily in this area are
necessarily more negatively affected
than vessels that fish outside of this
area, but there is neither discriminatory
intent to this measure, nor direct or
deliberate distribution of DAS or access
to the fishery among individual vessels
based on principal or home port. Any
disproportionate impact is an
unavoidable consequence of geography,
not a result of intent to discriminate. As
specified in the National Standard 4
guidelines, allocation of fishing
privileges may disadvantage one group
over another if it is necessary to achieve
the objectives of the FMP. As a result,
the GOM Differential DAS Area is
reasonably calculated as necessary to
promote conservation and is consistent
with the guidelines developed for
National Standard 4 and the objectives
of the FMP.
As required by National Standard 8,
the EA prepared to support this action
analyzes and fully takes into account
the social and economic impacts of the
proposed GOM Differential DAS Area.
This analysis indicates that the
alternative adopted by the Council not
only meets the conservation objectives
of this action, but it would also result
in the least reduction in fishing
revenues of all of the alternatives
considered. The proposed measure
minimizes the adverse economic
impacts to fishing communities and
provides the greatest potential for
sustained participation of such
communities among the alternatives
considered. Therefore, the GOM
Differential DAS Area measure is fully
consistent with National Standard 8.
Comment 15: Ten commenters
suggested that the GOM Differential
DAS Area in particular, and the suite of
measures proposed by FW 42, in
general, are inconsistent with National
Standard 1 because they fail to achieve
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
OY on many healthy stocks or provide
the greatest overall benefit to the nation.
They based their claim on the fact that
recently observed landings are lower
than the Target TACs established for
several species. Further, eight
commenters argued that the GOM
Differential DAS Area will fail to
prevent overfishing of GOM cod, but
will actually increase F on this species
by providing incentives for vessels that
traditionally fish within this area to
concentrate fishing effort on the highestvalued species, primarily GOM cod.
Finally, four commenters suggested that,
because some vessels will be unable to
steam outside of this area due to their
vessel size, these vessels will be forced
to fish within this area, therefore,
increasing discards of GOM cod and CC/
GOM yellowtail flounder.
Response: The model used to evaluate
the impacts of the differential DAS
counting areas (i.e., the CAM) attempts
to predict vessel behavior to maximize
fishing profit in response to the suite of
proposed measures. As a result, the
CAM attempts to capture any change in
fishing behavior to target the highestvalued species. Therefore, the results of
the CAM reflect anticipated behavior
changes in response to the GOM
Differential DAS Area and indicate that
the proposed measure still meets the
mortality objectives of this action. In
addition, because the CAM incorporates
trip limits, the model’s results
incorporate any changes in F
attributable to discards of GOM cod and
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder, although
it is not possible to isolate the direction
and degree of change with respect to
discards from these results.
As acknowledged many times in
Amendment 13 and FW 42, it is difficult
to achieve an exact balance of measures
that will achieve the necessary
conservation objectives for all stocks
while ensuring OY at the same time in
a fishery as diversified and complex as
the groundfish fishery. Due to the
comingled nature of the groundfish
fishery and the reliance upon nonselective measures such as DAS
reductions to manage the fishery, effort
and subsequent F reductions on one
stock will likely result in effort and F
reductions on other stocks. Because
several stocks managed by the FMP
require F reductions to comply with the
Amendment 13 rebuilding programs,
the consequence of measures such as
the GOM Differential DAS Area result in
decreased catch of other, including
healthier, groundfish stocks. FW 42
attempts to balance out and mitigate the
impacts of such unavoidable reductions
in catch by proposing the continuation
of programs that facilitate the harvest of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62171
healthier stocks. Examples of such
programs include approved SAPs and
the Regular B DAS Program. Further, the
DAS Leasing Program attempts to allow
vessels to obtain additional DAS to
pursue other stocks. Should vessels take
advantage of these programs, it is likely
that the fishery will better achieve OY
while overfished stocks rebuild
according to the Amendment 13
rebuilding programs.
As highlighted in the response to
Comment 39 below, it is important to
point out that Target TACs are an
imprecise indicator of whether the
fishery is achieving OY. As originally
defined by Amendment 9, and
described in Section 3.1.4 of
Amendment 13, ‘‘OY for a stock is
achieved when fishing at the target F for
a given stock size.’’ Therefore, the
important factor determining OY is not
whether the fishery harvests the Target
TACs for each stock, but whether the
fishery is achieving the F targets
established for each stock. The
rebuilding programs established under
Amendment 13 were designed to end
overfishing and achieve OY for the
fishery. These rebuilding programs
comply with National Standard 1 and
other applicable law in that they end
overfishing on all stocks managed by the
FMP and rebuild overfished groundfish
stocks within the required timeframe.
Measures proposed by FW 42 are
necessary to end overfishing for some
stocks and to continue to achieve the F
targets established by the Amendment
13 rebuilding programs. This rebuilding
strategy was designed to achieve OY, as
reduced by social, economic, and
ecological factors, in order to provide
the greatest benefit to the nation, once
all stocks are rebuilt, consistent with the
National Standard 1 guidelines at
§ 600.310. Because the measures
proposed by FW 42, including the GOM
Differential DAS Area, ensure that
several grounfish stocks remain on the
Amendment 13 rebuilding trajectory,
they are also consistent with National
Standard 1.
Comment 16: One commenter argued
that vessels within both the gillnet and
hook gear sectors of the fishery should
be exempt from the GOM Differential
DAS Area restrictions, citing the recent
decision by NMFS to exempt members
of the GB Cod Hook Sector from
differential DAS counting because they
do not land very much yellowtail
flounder (71 FR 42087, July 25, 2006).
Response: NMFS does not believe it is
appropriate to exempt vessels fishing
with gillnets or hook gear from the
requirements of the GOM Differential
DAS Area for several reasons. First,
these vessels are not required to use
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62172
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
gillnets or hook gear for the entire FY
and may elect to fish with trawl gear at
any time during the FY. However,
members of the GB Cod Hook Sector are
required to fish with hook gear
throughout the year. Further, the Sector
demonstrated through catch reports that
Sector vessels caught only minimal
amounts of flatfish, including yellowtail
flounder. It has not been demonstrated
that gillnets are capable of avoiding
yellowtail flounder; in fact, some gillnet
gear specifically targets flatfish. Second,
members of the GB Cod Hook Sector are
restricted by a hard TAC on the amount
of cod that such vessels can land,
whereas non-Sector vessels, including
non-Sector vessels using hook gear,
would have no such limitation on the
amount of cod catch and would only be
restricted by DAS use and daily
possession limits. Thus, the intent of the
GOM Differential DAS Area could be
easily undermined and F could actually
increase on GOM cod. Third, the GB
Cod Hook Sector Area is entirely
outside of the GOM cod stock area and
these vessels target GB cod, not GOM
cod. Therefore, it would be
inappropriate and inconsistent with the
goals and objectives of this action and
the FMP to allow vessels using gillnet
gear and hook gear outside of the GB
Cod Hook Sector to be exempt from the
requirements of the GOM Differential
DAS Area.
Comment 17: Eight commenters
suggested that the differential DAS
counting rate should be kept at 1.4:1
within the GOM Differential DAS Area.
Some claimed that incorrect data for
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder was used
in the analysis for FW 42 and that, if
corrected data were used for this stock,
the need to implement a differential
DAS rate of 2:1 to reduce F would be
eliminated. Others claimed that updated
data describing the effects of the
emergency measures implemented by
the April 13, 2006, emergency interim
final rule will indicate that the fishery
has already met the necessary F
reductions for CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder for 2006, eliminating the need
for additional F reductions for this
stock. One other commenter claimed
that updated data for FY 2005 will
reveal that the Amendment 13 measures
were more effective at reducing F for
most stocks than previously estimated.
Commenters suggested that differential
DAS counting within the GOM should
be limited to FY 2006 only, and that the
Council should substitute this with
another measure for FY 2007 and 2008,
including either eliminating differential
DAS counting entirely or by substituting
differential DAS counting with the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
industry proposal offered by the
Northeast Seafood Coalition during the
development of FW 42.
Response: Data used to evaluate
whether additional measures proposed
by FW 42 are necessary to meet the F
targets for 2006 represent the best
scientific information available.
Additional catch data identified by the
commenters were not available at the
time the Council adopted FW 42 and
submitted it to NMFS for final review.
The National Standard 2 guidelines
indicate that new information that
becomes available between the initial
drafting of the action and its submission
for final review should be incorporated
into the final action where practicable,
but only if the information indicates
that drastic changes have occurred in
the fishery that could require the
revision of the proposed action. The
catch data identified by the commenters
did not become available until after the
Council submitted FW 42 to NMFS for
final review. As a result, no analysis
was conducted to determine the effects
of incorporating this information into
the analysis of the FW 42 measures.
Because no analysis of the impact of this
information was provided by the
commenters, it is uncertain whether this
additional information would be
sufficient to indicate that the existing
management measures, including those
implemented by the April 13, 2006,
emergency interim final rule, achieved
the necessary F reductions for all stocks.
Further, because the catch data referred
to by the commenters is preliminary
information, these data are not sufficient
to evaluate whether drastic changes
have occurred in the fishery that could
require revision of the measures
proposed by FW 42. However, NMFS
has no reason to believe that drastic
changes in the fishery have occurred.
Because F is evaluated on a CY basis
instead of a FY basis, it is not
appropriate to use final landings from
FY 2005, or even preliminary landings
from FY 2006, to evaluate whether the
F targets for CY 2005 were achieved, or
whether the measures implemented by
the emergency action were sufficient to
reduce F for particular stocks for CY
2006, respectively. Although additional
data may provide a more accurate
depiction of catch and effort in the
fishery during the entire FY 2005 and
the first portion of FY 2006, as it would
be in hindsight of any action,
consideration of such preliminary data
would further delay FW 42. Because
measures in the emergency action do
not fully achieve the necessary F
reductions in FY 2006 for CC/GOM
yellowtail flounder, it is critical that FW
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
42 be implemented as soon as possible
in order to prevent overfishing on this
stock and other stocks and prevent
delaying the Amendment 13 rebuilding
programs for all stocks. For a discussion
regarding the validity of the data used
to support measures proposed by FW
42, see the response to Comment 42
below. Therefore, FW 42 measures are
based on the best scientific information
available, consistent with National
Standard 2.
The Council never considered a
differential DAS counting rate of 1.4:1
within the GOM Differential DAS Area,
but rather adopted a differential DAS
counting rate of 2:1 because it met the
mortality objectives of this action for FY
2006 through 2008 within a small
geographic area. In contrast to the
emergency action that implemented a
differential DAS counting rate of 1.4:1
throughout the entire GOM RMA, FW
42 proposed to implement a higher
differential DAS counting rate of 2:1
within a smaller inshore GOM
Differential DAS Area as part of a
targeted approach to reduce F on
overfished stocks while minimizing
reductions in F for other healthier
stocks. Under the emergency action, a
differential DAS counting rate of 1.4:1
was able to meet the necessary F
reductions for GOM cod because it was
applied to the entire GOM RMA, not
just the inshore portion of the area.
However, even over this expanded area,
this lower differential rate was unable to
achieve the necessary F reduction for
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder. Therefore,
it is unlikely that such a revision would
achieve the necessary F reductions for
GOM cod and CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder over the much smaller area
proposed by the GOM Differential DAS
Area. The Council did not specify an
end date for this measure, implying that
this measure would remain in place
until changed by a subsequent action.
The Council may elect to modify or
revise this measure through a future
management action. Substituting the
GOM Differential DAS measure
proposed in FW 42 with the Northeast
Seafood Coalition’s proposal, as
submitted at the March 2006 Council
meeting, would not be approvable since
the PDT found that the proposal, as
proposed, would not achieve the
necessary F reductions for several
stocks.
Comment 18: One commenter
suggested that NMFS allow vessels to
declare into the GOM Differential DAS
Area while at sea in a manner similar to
the ‘‘flex’’ options.
Response: In general, NMFS requires
that vessels declare their intent to fish
in a particular area via VMS prior to
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
leaving port to ensure effective
administration, monitoring, and
enforcement of the area-specific
provisions such as DAS counting and
trip limits. Because FW 42 would allow
a vessel fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area to elect to fish outside of
this area on the same trip via declaring
a ‘‘flex’’ trip, NMFS has determined that
it would be appropriate to also provide
the industry with an option to declare
their intent to fish in the GOM
Differential DAS Area via the ‘‘flex’’
options, as recommended by this
commenter. Therefore, a vessel could
elect to ‘‘Flex into the GOM Differential
DAS Area’’ while at sea to enable it to
fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
and the GOM Differential DAS Area on
the same trip. Alternatively, the vessel
could declare into this area prior to
leaving port. More information
regarding area declarations and
available ‘‘flex’’ options will be detailed
in a permit holder letter sent to all
groundfish vessels.
Commercial Trip Limits
Comment 19: Eight commenters
supported the proposed GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit.
Response: NMFS also supports the
proposed trip limit for GB yellowtail
flounder and implements this limit
through this final rule.
Comment 20: Four commenters
supported the proposed trip limits for
CC/GOM and SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder, while one other commenter
suggested that such trip limits would
increase discards.
Response: FW 42 indicates that,
although the proposed trip limits may
increase discard rates for CC/GOM and
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, the
amount of discards should actually
decrease due to effort reductions in the
form of the default DAS reduction and
GOM and SNE Differential DAS Areas
also proposed in FW 42. Further, the
proposed mesh revision in the SNE/MA
RMA should also decrease discards of
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder. The
proposed trip limits for CC/GOM and
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder may also
decrease discards by standardizing the
trip limits between the two stock areas
and throughout the FY. Analysis
conducted for this action accounts for
discard mortality when evaluating the
efficacy of the proposed trip limits on F.
Based on this analysis, the proposed trip
limits are necessary to achieve the
rebuilding objectives of this action.
Comment 21: Three commenters
supported the proposed trip limit of
5,000 lb/trip (2,268 kg/trip) for GB
winter flounder, while four commenters
supported a trip limit of 7,500 lb/trip
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
(3,402 kg/trip) and one commenter
thought it should be 10,000 lb/trip
(4,536 kg/trip) instead. Those
supporting a higher trip limit suggest
that the higher trip limit is supported by
the FW 42 analysis.
Response: Two of the alternatives
considered by the Council during the
development of FW 42, Alternative B2
and E (modified), included a GB winter
flounder trip limit of 750 lb/DAS (340
kg/DAS), up to 7,500 lb/trip (3,402 kg/
trip). However, the Council modified
the GB winter flounder trip limit in
Alternative B2 to 5,000 lb/trip (2,268 kg/
trip) by unanimous consent and
subsequently adopted this revised
alternative as its preferred alternative
for FW 42. Council members expressed
concern that excessive discards would
result under a daily possession limit for
this stock, suggesting that an overall trip
limit of 5,000 lb/trip (2,268 kg/trip)
would more effectively reduce discards
by minimizing the time necessary to
catch the GB winter flounder trip limit.
The proposed trip limit of 5,000 lb/trip
(2,268 kg/trip) was selected based on the
average trip duration of seven DAS
multiplied by the proposed daily trip
limit of 750 lb/DAS (340 kg/DAS) (7
DAS × 750 lb/DAS (340 kg/DAS) = 5,250
lb/trip (2,381.4 kg/trip)). Because the
Council did not analyze the 10,000 lb/
trip (4,536 kg/trip) limit suggested by
one commenter, it is unknown whether
this trip limit would achieve the
necessary F reductions for this stock,
given the other measures proposed by
FW 42. Therefore, implementation of
the proposed GB winter flounder trip
limit of 5,000 lb/trip (2,268 kg/trip),
which was demonstrated to achieve the
necessary F reductions, is justified.
Regular B DAS Program
Comment 22: Seven commenters,
including the DMR, supported the
proposed revisions to the Regular B
DAS Program. One of these commenters
stated that this program was important
to help mitigate the economic impacts
of recent effort reductions.
Response: NMFS agrees that this
program is an important way for vessels
to mitigate the economic impacts of
recent effort reductions and that the
proposed revisions to this program
would allow vessels to use Regular B
DAS to target healthy stocks without
compromising the rebuilding efforts of
overfished stocks.
Comment 23: Two commenters
suggested that NMFS should maximize
the observer coverage to improve the
effectiveness of this program. One
commenter indicated that the 3-day
Observer Program notice is
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62173
unreasonable and unfairly limits the
flexibility of vessel operations.
Response: A relatively high rate of
observer coverage (a target observer
coverage rate of approximately 36
percent based on previous observer
coverage) is specified for this program.
During the recent pilot phase of this
program, approximately 36 percent of
trips into this program were observed.
NMFS believes the current observer
coverage rate is sufficient to effectively
monitor this program without
compromising efforts to observe vessel
operations in the rest of the fishery. A
3-day notice is necessary to allow the
Observer Program to deploy observers
and ensure that the proper amount of
coverage for this program is achieved
throughout the FY.
Comment 24: One commenter
observed that the overall Target TACs
and resulting Incidental Catch TACs for
several species are too small to support
an active Regular B DAS Program in the
GOM. Three other commenters
contended that the program offers little
value to vessels unless they are capable
of fishing on GB for haddock.
Response: Because of the need to
reduce F for several stocks in the GOM
and SNE RMAs, the Target TACs and
Incidental Catch TACs for several
species are necessary to achieve the F
objectives in FW 42. Therefore,
participation in the Regular B DAS
Program will likely be limited by the
availability of the incidental catch TACs
for specific stocks of concern, in
particular GOM cod and CC/GOM
yellowtail flounder, which have
quarterly Incidental Catch TACs as low
as 6.7 mt (14,771 lb, or 6,700 kg) and 0.8
mt (1,764 lb, or 800 kg), respectively.
FW 42 identifies several healthy
groundfish stocks that may be targeted
by vessels participating in the Regular B
DAS Program: GB haddock, redfish,
pollock, GOM winter flounder, and
GOM haddock. Therefore, although
limited, this program offers benefits to
participating vessels in both the GOM
and GB, to the extent practicable,
provided vessels can selectively target
these stocks without catching large
quantities of the stocks of concern.
Comment 25: Three commenters,
including the DMF, stated that it is
impossible for gillnet vessels and small
trawl vessels to effectively participate in
this program, given the proposed small
possession limits and the haddock
separator trawl requirement. One
commenter specifically requested a
special Regular B DAS Program for
gillnet vessels, stating that these vessels
cannot fish with the haddock separator
trawl.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62174
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Response: The proposed measures
outlined for the Regular B DAS Program
only require trawl vessels to fish with a
haddock separator trawl when
participating in this program. Gillnet
vessels may fish with gillnet gear under
this program. Gillnet vessels will be
limited to 100 lb/DAS (45.4 kg/DAS) for
each stock of concern and will not be
limited to the restrictive trip limits for
monkfish, flounders, skates, and
lobsters required by the haddock
separator trawl performance standards
proposed for trawl vessels fishing in the
Regular B DAS Program. The intent of
this program is to selectively target
healthy stocks (primarily haddock)
while avoiding stocks of concern. The
restrictive possession limits are
necessary to reduce incentives to catch
stocks of concern, which would
compromise the effectiveness of the
haddock separator trawl.
Comment 26: Three commenters
requested that NMFS make several
revisions to the proposed requirements
for the Regular B DAS Program, as
follows: (1) Remove the haddock
separator trawl requirement; (2)
eliminate the restrictive trip limits of
500 lb/trip (227 kg/trip) for flatfish and
monkfish outlined in the Gear
Performance Incentives; (3) increase the
possession limits of groundfish stocks of
concern proportionate to the Incidental
Catch TACs for these stocks; and (4)
increase the number of Regular B DAS
allocated in each quarter, using catch
rates from the Regular B DAS Pilot
Program. These commenters stated that
the proposed gear requirement would
eliminate the incentive to test and
improve the effectiveness of other gear
under this program. Further, they
question the effectiveness of the
haddock separator trawl. These
commenters contend that the proposed
trip limits are confusing, are not
supported by any identified
conservation or management objectives,
and that the quarterly Incidental Catch
TACs and DAS limits provide sufficient
protection for stocks of concern.
Although the commenters supported the
concept of gear performance standards,
they contested that the proposed
standards are arbitrary since the
performance of the separator trawl to
date indicates that this gear is not
capable of achieving these standards.
Three other commenters, including the
DMR, supported the proposed Gear
Performance Incentives for Special
Management Programs, stating that they
minimize incentives to compromise the
effectiveness of the haddock separator
trawl.
Response: The intent of the proposed
haddock separator trawl requirement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
was to facilitate the harvest of healthy
stocks such as haddock and pollock,
while reducing the catch of overfished
stocks such as cod, yellowtail flounder,
and winter flounder. When properly
configured, the haddock separator trawl
is capable of effectively reducing the
catches of cod, flounders, and other
bottom-dwelling species such as
monkfish, skates, and lobsters when
targeting haddock. However, when
improperly configured, the net is
capable of catching larger amounts of
these species, as observed in the recent
performance of the haddock separator
trawl in the NE multispecies fishery.
The proposed Gear Performance
Incentives, reflected in the trip limits
associated with the use of the haddock
separator trawl in the Regular B DAS
Program and the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP, were developed by the
Council to increase incentives to
configure the gear properly to avoid
catching cod, flounder, skates,
monkfish, and lobsters, thereby
minimizing bycatch and time sorting
catch on deck. These performance
incentives were first proposed by the
Groundfish Advisory Panel and later
modified by the Groundfish Oversight
Committee to provide a minimal
allowance of bycatch of these other
species. The proposed performance
incentives are similar to the results
achieved by a 1992 experiment by the
Canadian Department of Fisheries and
Oceans to test the performance of a
haddock separator trawl. These
standards are necessary to help promote
and help ensure that the haddock
separator trawl is used as intended in
order to reduce catches of stocks of
concern and prolong the availability of
Incidental Catch TACs and access to
this program. FW 42 does provide a
mechanism whereby additional gears
can be authorized in this program. The
Council did not increase the number of
Regular B DAS allocated to each quarter,
as suggested by the commenter, but
instead chose to reduce the number of
Regular B DAS allocated to the first
quarter to reduce the impact of this
program on spawning fish. NMFS finds,
therefore, that the suggested revisions to
the Regular B DAS Program are not
justified.
Comment 27: The Council
recommended that NMFS consider
requiring vessels participating in the
Regular B DAS Program within the
proposed differential DAS Areas to
declare their intent to fish in these areas
prior to leaving port to accurately count
DAS, should the vessel is required to
flip its DAS, in order to simplify
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
enforcement and administration of this
measure.
Response: As proposed, vessels would
only be charged DAS at the differential
DAS counting rate of 2:1 when declared
into either the GOM or the SNE
Differential DAS Areas and fishing
under a Category A DAS. Because a
vessel participating in this program is
not subject to differential DAS counting
while under a Regular B DAS, NMFS is
requiring vessels to declare their intent
to fish within the differential DAS Areas
only when flipping to a Category A
DAS. NMFS believes that the measure,
as proposed, is sufficient to simplify
administration and enforcement of this
provision.
Renewal of DAS Leasing Program
Comment 28: Nine commenters,
including the DMR, supported the
extension of the DAS Leasing Program,
as it mitigates the economic impacts of
recent and continuing effort reductions.
Six commenters, including the DMF,
contest this belief and suggest that the
leasing program will not mitigate the
economic impacts of recent effort
reductions, but will instead increase
effort, and therefore F, on GOM cod, and
result in further effort reductions and
economic impacts in the future.
Response: The DAS Leasing Program
provides benefits to fishermen that help
offset some of the economic and social
impacts resulting from continued effort
reductions in the fishery. Analysis of
the impacts of the DAS Leasing Program
indicates that it is difficult to isolate the
impacts of the DAS Leasing Program
from the impacts of other management
measures. However, an estimation of the
impact from this program indicated that
landings of most stocks by lessee vessels
increased during CY 2004 when
compared to their landings in CY 2003,
suggesting that the leasing program is
responsible for nominal increases in
landings and F for these stocks.
Although landings of GOM cod
increased by approximately 3 percent,
the stocks for which the DAS Leasing
Program contributed the highest
increase in landings (GB haddock,
pollock, redfish, witch flounder, and
American plaice) are all considered
healthy stocks that do not need F
reductions to maintain the Amendment
13 rebuilding program. This suggests
that the DAS Leasing Program actually
increases landings of these healthy
species, thereby increasing the
likelihood that the fishery will harvest
OY from these stocks. The analysis
further indicated that the DAS Leasing
Program provided regulatory relief that
allowed lessee vessels, on average, to
fish enough DAS to cover their overhead
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and crew expenses, resulting in
economic benefits to the fishery. As a
result, the DAS Leasing Program does,
in fact, help mitigate the economic
impacts of recent effort reductions.
National Standards 5 and 8 require that
management measures consider
efficiency in the utilization of fishery
resources, where practicable, and
provide for the sustained participation
of fishing communities, respectively,
consistent with the conservation
objectives of the FMP. Consistent with
these national standards, this final rule
continues the DAS Leasing Program in
order to increase the efficient utilization
of fishery resources and help provide a
means of mitigating some of the
economic impacts of effort reductions in
the fishery to promote continued
participation. FW 42 concludes that the
DAS Leasing Program, in light of other
measures in FW 42, will not undermine
conservation objectives of this action or
the FMP.
Comment 29: Five commenters,
including the DMF, asserted that the
DAS Leasing Program is discriminatory
because it consolidates DAS onto fewer
vessels, preventing other vessels from
gaining access to the fishery, suggesting
an inconsistency with National
Standard 4. Further, they claimed that
smaller vessels that fish within the
GOM are effectively restricted from
participating in the DAS Leasing
Program due to the proposed differential
DAS counting in the inshore GOM and
the higher cost to lease DAS to fish in
this area.
Response: The DAS Leasing Program
was designed with several provisions
that limit the potential for consolidation
of DAS within the fleet, including a cap
on the number of DAS that a vessel
could lease and limiting leases to
vessels that are within specific size
restrictions of the lessor vessel. As
specified above, the DAS Leasing
Program allows active groundfish
vessels to continue to participate in the
fishery by acquiring additional DAS
from other vessels. An evaluation of the
DAS Leasing Program reveals that this
program allowed lessee vessels,
including small trawl vessels, to fish
enough DAS to cover overhead and
crew expenses. This analysis also points
out that the DAS Leasing Program
resulted in a net increase in DAS for
vessels operating out of Massachusetts,
a state bordering the GOM. The FW 42
analysis acknowledges that vessels that
have traditionally fished within the
GOM Differential DAS Area may have a
difficult time acquiring sufficient DAS
through the DAS Leasing Program to
fish in this area due to differential DAS
counting. However, as noted above,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
differential DAS counting is necessary
to achieve the conservation objectives of
this action. Should a vessel determine
that it is not profitable to fish within the
GOM, given the impact of differential
DAS counting, the DAS Leasing
Program would enable such vessels to
earn some revenue by leasing DAS to
other vessels. Because the DAS Leasing
Program does not contain any provision
that discriminates among participants
based on state of residence or any other
criteria and makes no direct or
deliberate distribution of DAS among
individuals, the continuation of the
DAS Leasing Program is consistent with
the guidelines developed for National
Standard 4 and contributes towards
achieving goals 4 and 5 and objective 7
of the FMP as defined in Amendment
13.
Renewal and Modification of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
Comment 30: Six commenters,
including the DMR, expressed general
support for the renewal and proposed
modifications to the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area Haddock SAP.
Response: NMFS has also approved
the proposed modifications to this SAP
and continues it through FY 2008.
GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector
Comment 31: Thirty commenters
expressed support for the proposed GB
Cod Fixed Gear Sector, as it facilitates
responsibility and accountability in the
fishery, protects cod, and limits effort
shifts within the fishery. Twenty-five
commenters suggested that NMFS
should correct the Fixed Gear Sector
Area to reflect the larger area proposed
by the Sector Operations Plan, rather
than the existing GB Cod Hook Gear
Sector Area, as this could facilitate
pursuit of an offshore monkfish fishery
while accounting for GB cod caught.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
proposed Sector facilitates
responsibility and accountability within
the fishery. In addition, NMFS agrees
that the proposed measure limits effort
shifts within the fishery by requiring
that Sector vessels fish with specific
gear within a specific area. Further, by
limiting catches of cod to a hard TAC,
the proposed Sector ensures that F on
GB cod from this Sector will not exceed
its F targets. Because the catches of
other species are regulated by DAS,
NMFS believes that the proposed Sector
is consistent with the F objectives of
this action for other species and the
overall objectives of the FMP.
Because the FW 42 document did not
identify a geographic area associated
with the proposed GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector, NMFS proposed that the GB Cod
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62175
Fixed Gear Sector Area be the same as
the GB Cod Hook Gear Sector Area,
based on the fact that the goals of the
GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector are very
similar to those of the GB Cod Hook
Gear Sector. The GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector submitted an Operations Plan
requesting that Sector participants be
allowed to fish in an area larger than the
GB Cod Hook Sector Area identified in
the FW 42 proposed rule in order to
pursue an offshore gillnet fishery for
monkfish. A proposed rule (August 22,
2006, 71 FR 48903) soliciting public
comment on this Operations Plan is
currently under review.
Comment 32: One commenter
opposed the proposed Fixed Gear
Sector, stating that NMFS should not
encourage distribution of public
resources into the control of private
groups for their exclusive use. This
commenter indicated that the proposed
Sector neither advances rebuilding
objectives, nor mitigates economic or
social impacts of Amendment 13, and
recommends that NMFS should expand
participation in the fishery consistent
with the 14th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. Two commenters
expressed concern that an exemption
from the gillnet limits for the proposed
Sector will allow vessels to exclusively
target cod and then shift effort to other
species, thereby reducing the
effectiveness of the existing limit on the
number of gillnets that may be fished by
Day gillnet vessels and increasing effort
on pollock and monkfish.
Response: Amendment 13 created the
mechanism by which sectors can be
formed. The objective of sectors is to
provide incentives for groups of similar
vessels (by port, gear type, size, etc.) to
regulate themselves in an efficient and
effective manner (see Section 3.4.16 of
Amendment 13). Sectors also provide a
mechanism for capacity reduction
through consolidating effort onto fewer
vessels, thereby ‘‘reducing the cost of
operations and possibly facilitating the
profitable exit of some individual vessel
owners from the fishery.’’ The creation
of a sector does not deprive other
vessels from participating in the fishery,
or from other fishing opportunities.
Rather, it limits the fishing activities of
a specific group of vessels to their
historic participation in the fishery.
Amendment 13 also requires that a
sector stay within its allocation of GB
cod and/or other hard TACs, which
ensure that the sectors achieve the goals
of the FMP for these species. Further,
sectors provide substantial benefits to
participants by creating incentives to
regulate themselves in an effective and
efficient manner.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62176
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
The proposed Sector is limited by
both a hard TAC on GB cod and by DAS
for all other species. Therefore, Sector
vessels would be required to use a NE
multispecies DAS and/or monkfish DAS
on every fishing trip and would be
required to abide by all other
regulations, unless specifically
exempted by the Regional
Administrator. As a result, the concern
that Sector vessels could reduce the
effectiveness of the gillnet limitation on
pollock and monkfish by shifting effort
onto these species appears unfounded.
Section 303(b) of the MagnusonStevens Act allows the establishment of
a limited access system in a fishery to
achieve OY. NMFS believes that it
would be inappropriate to expand
participation in the fishery beyond its
current capacity, as this would
compromise the Amendment 13
rebuilding programs and prevent the
groundfish fishery from achieving OY.
Comment 33: Seven commenters
recommended that NMFS only approve
the proposed Sector if it would be
allocated hard TACs for all stocks.
Another commenter indicated that the
proposed Sector should have hard TACs
for bycatch species and monkfish. One
other commenter opposed the approval
of Sectors with a combination of both
DAS and hard TACs as the primary
management measures and indicated
that the proposed Sector could cause
effort to be redirected, having a
significant impact on the rest of the
fleet.
Response: Section 3.4.16 of
Amendment 13 describes the
mechanism by which sectors may be
formed, indicating that ‘‘Allocations to
each sector may be based on catch (hard
TACs) or effort (DAS) with target TACs
specified for each sector.’’ Although
there has been some debate whether
new sectors should be managed
exclusively by either hard TACs or DAS
restrictions, NMFS approved the GB
Cod Hook Sector Operations Plan with
a combination of both hard TACs and
DAS limits after determining that DAS
limits provide sufficient protection of
stocks not subject to the hard TACs
specified for a particular sector. In FW
42, the Council approved the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector, which explicitly
included a combination of hard TAC
management for GB cod and DAS to
manage all other groundfish stocks. It
was unclear from the comment received
how such sectors could cause effort to
be redirected and what impact it would
have on the rest of the fleet. As
discussed in the response to Comment
32, the proposed Sector should not
result in significant effort shifts, as
Sector vessels would be limited to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
specific gear and area restrictions. By
staying within these restrictions, Sector
operations should not affect whether the
rest of the fishery achieves the
conservation objectives for GB cod and
would have a minimal impact on
potential future effort reductions in the
fishery.
Eastern U.S./Canada Area Flexibility
Comment 34: Ten commenters,
including the DMR, supported the
proposed measure to allow vessels to
fish inside and outside of the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on the same trip, as
it provides important flexibility in
vessel operations in the event of bad
weather or poor fishing opportunities.
Response: NMFS has approved this
measure and implements it through this
final rule.
Modification of the DAS Transfer
Program
Comment 35: Eleven commenters,
including the DMR, expressed support
for the proposed modifications to the
DAS Transfer Program, as they would
increase the utility and effectiveness of
the program. One commenter opposed
allowing vessels to fish commercially
after transferring its DAS, believing
instead that the vessel should be
permanently removed from all fisheries.
Response: Previous requirements to
permanently exit all fisheries upon
transferring DAS contributed to
dissuading any vessel from participating
in this program. This undermined the
purpose and effectiveness of the
program and neither reduced capacity
in the NE multispecies fishery, nor
increased the efficiency of the fleet, as
intended. NMFS believes that the
proposed modifications would provide
incentives for vessels to participate in
the program, thereby permanently
reducing capacity and increasing
efficiency in the NE multispecies fishery
and has, therefore, approved this
program as proposed in FW 42.
Standardized Requirements for Special
Management Programs
Comment 36: Three commenters,
including the DMR and the Council,
believe that NMFS should continue to
require vessels to declare the statistical
area in which fish were caught via VMS.
These commenters state that there has
been no analysis to demonstrate that
VMS location can be reliably used to
assign catch to a particular statistical
area, especially considering that some
stocks are not uniformly distributed
within all stock areas. In addition, the
DMR suggested that NMFS require
vessels to report catch by 30′ squares.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Response: The proposed elimination
of this reporting requirement was
intended to reduce the reporting burden
on vessels participating in the Regular B
DAS Program and for vessels fishing
inside and outside of the Western U.S./
Canada Area on the same trip. However,
NMFS acknowledges that because some
stocks are not uniformly distributed
within all stock areas, it would be
difficult to utilize VMS to accurately
assign catch to a particular statistical
area and reinserts this requirement into
the final rule, thereby maintaining the
requirement to report the statistical area
in which fish were caught when
participating in these programs. If
appropriate, the Council may
recommend that vessels report catch by
30′ squares by proposing such
requirements in a subsequent action.
Modification of Cod Landing Limit in
Eastern U.S./Canada Area
Comment 37: Nine commenters
supported the modification to the GB
cod trip limit in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area.
Response: NMFS has approved the
proposed trip limit modification for GB
cod and implements it through this final
rule.
SNE/MA RMA Trawl Codend Mesh
Requirement
Comment 38: Four commenters
supported the proposed revision of the
SNE/MA RMA trawl mesh requirements
because it maintains consistency with
mesh requirements in other areas and
provides an incentive to use diamond
mesh to reduce discards of yellowtail
flounder.
Response: NMFS has approved the
proposed measure and implements it
through this final rule.
Regional Administrator Authority To
Adjust Trip Limits for Target TAC
Stocks
Comment 39: Eleven commenters,
including the Council, expressed
support for the proposed Regional
Administrator authority to adjust trip
limits upwards to facilitate the harvest
of the Target TACs specified for six
species, stating that it would facilitate
the harvest of OY in these fisheries. Two
of these commenters contested concerns
expressed in the proposed rule that this
measure would be problematic to
administer, stating that the Regional
Administrator has sufficient real-time
data to effectively project whether the
Target TAC would be harvested to allow
trip limits to be increased. One
commenter opposed this provision,
indicating that the proposed Target
TACs are set too high, that there is
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
limited real-time monitoring capability,
that the proposed measure does not also
include a provision to reduce Target
TACs, and that Target TACs are not
effective for determining whether the
management program is meeting F
targets.
Response: Contrary to assertions made
by several commenters, sufficient data
are not available to adequately assess
total catch for these six species on a
real-time basis. The Target TAC for
GOM cod is based on commercial
landings, discards, and recreational
harvest. Data on the recreational harvest
of GOM cod are not available on a realtime basis and are only available at the
end of the FY. Because recreational
harvest of GOM cod is a substantial
component of the overall catch of this
stock (approaching 43 percent of the
total catch in 2004) and has varied
considerably within the past 10 years, it
is not possible to accurately project the
total harvest of this stock throughout the
fishery on a real-time basis. Further,
discard estimates are generated in
several ways. For some stocks (e.g.,
GOM cod), discard estimates are derived
from observer data on a quarterly basis.
However, the availability of these data
would be inadequate for real-time
projections of total catch. For other
stocks (e.g., CC/GOM and SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder, in particular),
discards are estimated using VTRs.
However, discard data from VTRs are
not considered reliable and are subject
to change. Therefore, there is
considerable uncertainty regarding the
data available to project total harvest of
particular stocks on a real-time basis.
Because of these limitations, the data
available to implement this measure
would not constitute the best available
scientific information, as required by
National Standard 2. In addition,
section 303(a)(8) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that an FMP
specify the nature and extent of
scientific data needed for the effective
implementation of the FMP. As detailed
above, without additional real-time
reporting requirements to provide
reliable and timely catch and discard
data from both the commercial and
recreational sectors, NMFS would not
have sufficient real-time data to
accurately monitor catch of particular
species within the fishery. Therefore,
this measure is not consistent with
National Standard 2 or the required
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and NMFS has disapproved it.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Regional Administrator Authority To
Adjust Measures in the U.S./Canada
Management Area
Comment 40: Five commenters
expressed general support for the
Regional Administrator authority to
adjust measures in the U.S./Canada
Management Area.
Response: NMFS believes that this
measure increases the flexibility of the
Regional Administrator to adjust the
measures regulating vessel operations in
the U.S./Canada Management Area to
facilitate harvesting or prevent the
fishery from exceeding specified U.S./
Canada Management Area TACs for GB
cod, GB haddock, and GB yellowtail
flounder, or to prevent these TACs from
being exceeded at any time during the
FY. Such flexibility eases the
administration and monitoring of these
TACs and allows more effective and
efficient management of the resources
within this area without compromising
the conservation objectives of the FMP.
General Comments
Comment 41: One commenter
suggested that NMFS extend the
emergency action and eight commenters
requested that NMFS implement the
measures proposed by FW 42 as soon as
possible, arguing that the measures
implemented by the April 13, 2006,
emergency interim final rule do not
meet the conservation objectives, but
that FW 42 would meet these objectives.
Four of these commenters expressed
their preference for another alternative
considered by the Council during the
development of FW 42, Alternative E
(modified).
Response: The emergency measures
implemented by the April 13, 2006,
emergency interim final rule were
meant as a stop-gap measure to
immediately reduce F on specific
stocks, but they were never meant to
achieve the full conservation objectives
for 2006 without subsequent
implementation of additional measures
proposed by FW 42. Because the
emergency measures are not intended to
achieve the necessary F reductions in
2006 for all stocks, it is not appropriate
to continue these measures. Therefore,
NMFS agrees that it is important to
implement approved FW 42 measures as
quickly as possible to ensure that the
conservation objectives are fully met for
2006. Alternative E was considered, but
not adopted by the Council during the
development of FW 42 because the
underlying conservation measure to
reduce F was based on charging DAS
used in 24-hr increments. Several
Council members expressed concern
that this alternative would pose greater
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62177
risk to vessel safety than the alternative
adopted in FW 42.
Comment 42: Two individuals
questioned the validity of the science
used to support measures proposed by
FW 42. Sixteen other commenters,
including the DMF, argued that the
analysis supporting FW 42 is
inconsistent with National Standard 2.
They assert that the CAM used to
evaluate the proposed measures is not
considered the best available science
because it assumes a ‘‘linear
relationship between catch-per-uniteffort (CPUE) and effort’’ without
sufficient supporting evidence that such
a relationship exists. Also, they suggest
that the assumptions used by the CAM
are invalid, including overestimating
the CPUE for CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder, and that the model does not
have sufficient resolution to predict
individual vessel behavior.
Response: The CAM is the primary
tool used to evaluate the effectiveness of
the proposed measures at achieving the
necessary F reductions for this action. In
2001, the fundamental structure of the
CAM was reviewed and endorsed by the
Social Sciences Advisory Committee of
the Council. In addition, a second
review of this model was conducted by
a panel of independent experts in
January 2004. Based upon this second
review, slight modifications to the CAM
were performed to enhance the
effectiveness of the model. Comparing
the results of the CAM to the change in
F between CY 2001 and CY 2004
observed by GARM II indicates that the
CAM results were a reasonable
approximation of the effectiveness of
the Amendment 13 measures in terms of
realized F for most stocks. Although the
commenters highlight additional and
ongoing evaluations of the performance
and adequacy of the CAM, to date these
reviews have yet to be completed and
submitted to the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center for review.
Commenters offered several criticisms
of the CAM that have been determined
to be inaccurate. First, the CAM is a
non-linear model based on profit, not
catch. The marginal profit of a particular
vessel is considered non-linear,
affecting where and when the vessel is
expected to fish to maximize profit.
However, CPUE is assumed to be
constant and does not change regardless
of how much effort is attributed to a
particular block fished in an effort to
maximize profit.
Assertions that changes in the CC/
GOM yellowtail flounder CPUE used in
the model would affect whether the
proposed measures are able to achieve
the necessary F reductions are also
inaccurate. The CAM evaluates the
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62178
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
changes in exploitation from the
proposed measures relative to statusquo measures. Therefore, if the same
CPUE for CC/GOM yellowtail flounder
is used to evaluate exploitation for both
status-quo and proposed measures, then
the relative change in exploitation
between the two sets of measures would
be the same, regardless of the value of
the CC/GOM yellowtail flounder CPUE
used by the model. The end result is
that the fishery requires a 40-percent
reduction in exploitation (or 46-percent
reduction in F) to maintain the
Amendment 13 rebuilding program for
this stock. In addition, applying the
same logic used to argue that the CPUE
for CC/GOM yellowtail flounder was
overestimated in the evaluation of FW
42 (that the absence of trip limits for
this stock during the 2001–2004 period
used to calculate the average CPUE for
the CAM overestimate the actual CPUE
for this stock) would suggest that the
CPUE for GOM cod was underestimated
in the evaluation of FW 42, as the
proposed trip limit of 800 lb/DAS (363
kg/DAS) is substantially higher than the
400–800 lb/DAS (181 kg–363 kg/DAS)
trip limits implemented between 2001–
2004 and used as the average CPUE in
the CAM.
The commenters repeatedly infer that
catch is an adequate measure of the
performance of the fishery. They state
that the small reductions in Target TAC
signify that only small F reductions are
necessary, eliminating the need for
draconian management measures.
However, the reason the Target TACs
are not as large as the required F
reductions is because the projection
model used to calculate Target TACs
assumes that biomass increases because
F is reduced to the necessary levels
upon implementation of the proposed
measures. As discussed in the response
to Comment 39, the true indicator of the
performance of the fishery is F, not
catch. Even though the fishery may
underharvest the Target TAC for a
particular stock during the FY, the F
may still be too high for that CY. The
CAM does not evaluate the proposed
measures based on expected catch, but
rather relative changes in exploitation,
which is then converted into F. Because
F is evaluated on a CY basis and not a
FY basis, it is inaccurate to compare
catch from a particular FY with F for a
particular CY.
One of the commenters stated that the
CAM only evaluates the impacts on 10
of the 20 stocks managed by the FMP.
This is not correct, as the CAM assesses
the impacts of proposed measures on 19
of the 20 stocks managed by the fishery
(Atlantic halibut is not included in the
CAM).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Finally, contrary to assertions made
by the commenters, the CAM uses the
fishing locations of similarly-configured
vessels from their fishing ports to
determine whether vessels would shift
effort into areas that they had never
fished previously. Because the CAM
uses data from VTRs, the CAM is
limited in its resolution regarding time
and area fished. However, the CAM is
able to sufficiently predict individual
vessel behavior to maximize profits
based on the available data. Additional
reporting requirements would need to
be implemented to improve the data
available to, and the resolution of, the
existing model. The commenters did not
question the validity of the economic
analysis conducted for FW 42, despite
the fact that the economic analysis relies
upon the output from the CAM to
estimate impacts on the fleet and fishing
communities. In summary, NMFS has
determined that the information relied
on, and the analysis conducted,
including analysis using the CAM,
represents the best scientific
information available, consistent with
National Standard 2.
Comment 43: One commenter
recommended that the GOM cod
possession limit remain at 600 lb/DAS
(272 kg/DAS) during FY 2006 to
minimize incentives to target GOM cod
and then increase the trip limit to 800
lb/DAS (363 kg/DAS) in FY 2007, once
the stock starts to improve.
Response: Emergency measures
implemented by the April 13, 2006,
emergency interim final rule established
a GOM cod trip limit of 600 lb/DAS (272
kg/DAS) to minimize incentives to
target GOM cod in the short term under
that action. However, in light of the
other measures proposed in FW 42, the
Council decided that it was not
necessary to change the proposed trip
limit of 800 lb/DAS (363 kg/DAS) in FW
42. The analysis for FW 42 concluded
that a change in the trip limit was not
necessary to achieve the necessary F
reductions for GOM cod, given the suite
of measures proposed by FW 42,
including the default DAS reduction
and the GOM Differential DAS Area. By
leaving the trip limit at 800 lb/DAS (363
kg/DAS) bycatch is reduced and
economic impacts on the fishing
industry is mitigated.
Comment 44: Some commenters
believed that the development of FW 42
was rushed and that the Council was
not given enough time to develop a
workable solution to address the
conservation objectives of the action.
Fifteen commenters argued that the
public were not given adequate
opportunity to evaluate the alternatives
considered by Council because the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
social and economic analysis of two of
the alternatives developed by the PDT
(Alternative E (modified) and
Alternative B2—the preferred
alternative adopted by the Council) was
not available for public review prior to
the Council’s vote to adopt a preferred
alternative in FW 42. Twelve
commenters believed that the social and
economic impacts of the proposed
measures were not given meaningful
consideration during the development
of FW 42, while four other commenters
specifically stated that a full
environmental impact statement (EIS)
should have been prepared for this
action because socio-economic impacts
and sacrificed OY resulted from an
inadequate range of alternatives.
Finally, two commenters advocated that
NMFS should disapprove FW 42 and
remit it to the Council for further
evaluation and consideration in order to
reconsider whether effort controls are
adequate in this fishery.
Response: The timeline available to
develop FW 42 was based on the
Amendment 13 requirement to
implement any modifications to the
management measures necessary to
achieve the Amendment 13 F targets for
each species and maintain the
Amendment 13 rebuilding programs by
the start of FY 2006 on May 1, 2006. The
development of FW 42 began in January
2005 and involved more than 10 public
meetings, including 5 Groundfish
Oversight Committee and 5 Council
meetings. In addition, the PDT held
more than 19 conference calls and
meetings that were often attended by
members of the public. To ensure that
these rebuilding programs remain on
track, the Council needed to complete
FW 42 by its November 2005 meeting to
ensure a May 1, 2006, implementation
date. Unfortunately, the Council was
unable to adopt FW 42 at its November
meeting, prompting NMFS to
implement emergency measures through
the April 13, 2006, emergency interim
final rule in time for the start of FY
2006. This delay afforded the Council 2
additional months to develop and refine
measures included in FW 42. In
addition, the emergency interim final
rule provided another mechanism to
comment on the measures implemented
by the April 13, 2006, emergency
interim final rule. Therefore, there was
ample opportunity for public input
during the development of a workable
solution to the management issues
addressed by FW 42.
The commenters are correct that
analysis of two additional alternatives
(Alternatives B2 and E (modified)) were
first presented to the public at the
January 26, 2006, Groundfish Oversight
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Committee meeting. These alternatives
were originally developed by the PDT at
the request of the Council at its
November 15–17, 2006, meeting to
analyze two separate areas for
differential DAS counting. In fact, the
PDT developed nine other alternatives
in response to the Council’s request, but
only forwarded Alternatives B2 and E to
the Groundfish Oversight Committee for
further consideration, as they more
effectively achieved the conservation
objectives of the action. A table
summarizing the measures included
within these new alternatives, as well as
tables comparing the biological and
economic impacts of these new
alternatives with the other alternatives
fully analyzed within the draft FW 42
document (Alternatives 1–5), were
presented to the Groundfish Oversight
Committee on January 26, 2006, and
later to the Council at its February 1,
2006, meeting. The full economic and
social impacts analyses of these two
new alternatives were still being written
and, therefore, were not available at this
meeting, however. Although more
detailed information regarding the
economic impacts of the other
alternatives in the draft document
(Alternatives 1–5) was available for the
Council’s February 1, 2006, meeting, the
Council focused its discussion on the
new Alternatives B2 and E because they
would avoid the sweeping reductions in
DAS allocations proposed in
Alternatives 1–5. The public and the
Council were provided with a summary
of the primary biological and economic
impacts (expected F and exploitation
rates for each stocks along with changes
in revenues by port) for each alternative
at the earliest opportunity and could
compare the alternatives under
consideration prior to the Council vote
to adopt a preferred alternative for FW
42. Therefore, the public and the
Council had all of the necessary
information and time to make an
informed decision about the overall
impacts of the alternatives considered.
Once completed, the final EA was
posted on the NMFS Northeast Regional
Office Web site and made available to
the public. Moreover, the public has had
the benefit of fully considering FW 42
measures and their analysis since the
proposed rule was published in July.
According to the NOAA guidelines for
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
(NOAA Administrative Order 216–6), an
EA must consider a reasonable range of
alternatives, including the preferred
action and the no action alternative. The
eight alternatives considered in the EA
prepared for FW 42 represent a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
reasonable range of alternatives. These
alternatives included a wide range of
options to reduce F in the fishery,
including DAS allocation reductions, a
minimum DAS charge, and differential
DAS counting. In addition, as specified
in the response to Comment 17, the
Council considered an additional
alternative, the industry proposal, that
was offered for the first time at the
February 1, 2006, Council meeting. The
Council requested that the PDT evaluate
the impacts of this industry proposal
and debated whether to substitute it for
the preferred alternative in FW 42 if
analysis suggested that it would meet
the necessary F reductions. Subsequent
analysis presented at the April 5, 2006,
Council meeting revealed that this
alternative would not achieve the
necessary F reductions for this action
and the alternative was not considered
further. All of the alternatives
considered were designed to meet the
purpose and need identified for this
action. Other alternatives that did not
meet the purpose and need for this
action were not pursued. Therefore,
NMFS asserts that a reasonable range of
alternatives were considered for this
action, consistent with the requirements
of the NAO 216–6 and the NEPA.
Both NAO 216–6 and NEPA specify
that significant economic and social
impacts, by themselves, do not trigger
the need to prepare an EIS. Further, the
biological analysis prepared for this
action indicates that the proposed FW
42 measures would not result in a
significant impact to the human
environment. Thus, an EA is
appropriate and sufficient to support
FW 42. Finally, this action is necessary
to ensure that overfishing is stopped
and that the stocks continue to rebuild
according to the Amendment 13
rebuilding programs. The Council may
reconsider whether DAS controls are
effective in the groundfish fishery, or
whether alternative management
regimes would better meet the
objectives of the FMP during the
development of a subsequent action.
Comment 45: Three commenters
specifically questioned whether FW 42
is consistent with National Standard 3
requirements to manage a group of
interrelated stocks as a unit or in
sufficiently close coordination. These
commenters suggested that the fishery is
instead managed through a series of
individual stock-specific F targets and
management measures that attempt to
achieve MSY from each stock
simultaneously, which may not be
possible due to the interrelation of
stocks in an ecosystem.
Response: All of the 19 groundfish
stocks in the FMP are managed in close
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62179
coordination with one another and as
one unit to the extent practicable, as
required by National Standard 3. Many
of the primary management measures of
this fishery are shared across the entire
stock complex, including DAS limits,
gear restrictions, limited access, and
size limits. The National Standard 3
guidelines indicate management
measures do not need to be identical for
each geographic area within the
management unit, provided that the
FMP justifies these differences. Both the
proposed GOM and SNE Differential
DAS Area include different regulations
that would only apply to portions of the
entire geographic range of a individual
stock and the stock complex as a whole.
The EA prepared for FW 42 justifies
these proposed measures by indicating
that a targeted approach was taken to
reduce F on GOM cod and CC/GOM and
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder by
charging DAS at a higher rate within
discrete areas responsible for the
majority of the catch of these stocks.
This was intended to effectively reduce
F on these stocks while maintaining
opportunities to harvest other stocks
within the GOM and SNE RMAs. While
it is true that the FMP establishes
individual stock-specific F targets, these
targets are necessary to maintain the
rebuilding programs established under
Amendment 13, as each individual
stock is at a different point along its
rebuilding trajectory. These rebuilding
programs are intended to rebuild the
stocks to BMSY, as required by the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Comment 46: Four commenters,
including the DMF, requested that
NMFS use the mixed-stock exemption
provided in the guidelines for National
Standard 1 to allow the fishery to
overfish CC/GOM yellowtail flounder in
order to avoid unnecessarily sacrificing
OY from other healthy stocks through
the implementation of drastic effort
reductions such as the proposed GOM
Differential DAS Area.
Response: The guidelines for National
Standard 1 at § 600.310(d)(6) indicate
that a Council may construct an FMP
such that it allows overfishing of one
stock in a multispecies complex to
achieve OY for another stock in the
multispecies complex, provided three
criteria are met: (1) Analysis indicates
that overfishing one stock to achieve OY
for another stock will result in net
benefits to the Nation; (2) analysis
indicates that similar long-term net
benefits cannot be achieved by
modifying fleet behavior, gear selection/
configuration, or other technical
characteristic in a manner that no
overfishing would occur; and (3) the F
rate would not cause any stock to
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62180
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
require protection under the
Endangered Species Act. The
commenters have not provided any
analysis that suggest that the three
criteria necessary to implement this
exemption would be met. Although this
alternative was discussed by the
Council in developing FW 42, it was not
seriously considered and not analyzed,
given the time constraints necessary to
complete FW 42 and uncertainty that
the necessary criteria could be met.
Moreover, the mixed-stock exemption
alternative would be such a radical
departure from the current management
regime that an amendment to the FMP,
rather than a framework adjustment,
would be necessary to implement it.
Comment 47: One commenter was
concerned that the proposed measures
may cause redirection of effort onto GB.
Response: Based on the CAM, the
proposed measures are not predicted to
cause effort shifts that would result in
increases in F on GB stocks. Analysis
prepared for FW 42 indicates that the
proposed measures will meet the
necessary F reductions for all stocks,
including those on GB. In addition,
because most of GB is governed by the
provisions of the U.S./Canada
Management Area, the Regional
Administrator has the authority to
revise specific measures to ensure that
vessel operations within this area do not
exceed specified TACs for GB yellowtail
flounder, and GB cod and GB haddock
in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area. Any
revisions to management measures to
protect these stocks will likely also
result in protection for other groundfish
stocks.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS has made several changes to
the proposed rule, including changes as
a result of public comment and the
disapproval of the measure that would
have provided the Regional
Administrator with the authority to
adjust trip limits for specific stocks.
Some of these changes are
administrative in nature, clarify the new
or existing management measures, or
correct inadvertent omissions in the
proposed rule. These changes are listed
below in the order that they appear in
the regulations.
The Council indicated that the PDT
recently discovered that there was a
mistake in the projection for American
plaice that over-estimated the Target
TACs and Incidental Catch TACs for
this species for FYs 2006–2008. The
Target TACs and Incidental Catch TACs
specified in Tables 2 and 3 above,
respectively, were corrected to rectify
this error.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
In § 648.14, paragraph (a)(174) has
been revised to clarify that the most
restrictive measures pertain to DAS
counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements.
In § 648.82, paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(A)
has been revised, in response to
comment and in order to be consistent
with Council intent, by removing
language specifying that a vessel may be
in the GOM Differential DAS Area due
to bad weather or circumstances beyond
a vessel’s control.
In § 648.82, paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(B) has
been revised, in response to comment
and in order to be consistent with
Council intent and FW 42, by adding
language that allows a vessel to be in the
SNE Differential DAS Area when not
fishing or transiting.
In § 648.82, paragraph (e)(2)(iv) has
been revised to clarify that the most
restrictive measures pertain to DAS
counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements.
In § 648.82, paragraph (e)(3) has been
revised to clarify that, for vessels fishing
in both the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
and the Regular B DAS Program on the
same trip, the applicable DAS
accounting rules for both areas apply.
In § 648.82, paragraph (k)(4)(xi)(B) has
been revised to clarify the rules
regarding the DAS Leasing Program
baseline downgrade in the context of a
DAS Transfer.
In § 648.82, paragraph (l)(1)(ii) has
been revised to insert a cross reference
to § 648.82(k)(4)(xi)(B) pertaining to the
rules regarding the DAS Leasing
Program baseline downgrade in the
context of a DAS Transfer.
In § 648.85, paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A) has
been revised to clarify that the most
restrictive measures pertain to DAS
counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements.
In § 648.85, paragraph (a)(3)(iv)(C)(2)
has been revised, in response to
comment and in order to be consistent
with Council intent, by inserting
language specifying that the Regional
Administrator may also adjust the GB
yellowtail flounder landing limit to
facilitate harvesting the GB yellowtail
flounder TAC.
In § 648.85, paragraph (a)(3)(v)(B) has
been revised, in response to comment
and in order to be consistent with
Council intent, to reinsert language
requiring vessels to report the statistical
area in which fish were caught.
In § 648.85, paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(E) has
been revised order to insert cross
references to applicable trip limits in
§ 648.85(a) that were omitted from the
proposed rule.
In § 648.85, paragraph (b)(8)(v)(I) has
been revised to insert cross references to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
applicable trip limits in § 648.85(a) that
were omitted from the proposed rule.
In § 648.87, paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(C),
has been revised to replace a reference
to the GB Cod Hook Gear Sector with
the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector.
Classification
The Regional Administrator
determined that the management
measures implemented by this final rule
are necessary for the conservation and
management of the NE multispecies
fishery, and are consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws. This final rule has been
determined to be significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866.
This final rule does not contain
policies with federalism or ‘‘takings’’
implications as those terms are defined
in E.O. 13132 and E.O. 12630,
respectively.
NMFS, pursuant to section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
prepared this FRFA in support of the
approved measures in FW 42. The FRFA
incorporates the economic impacts
summarized in the IRFA and the
corresponding RIR in the FW 42
document, and this final rule document.
The IRFA was published in the
proposed rule for this action and is not
repeated here. A description of why this
action was considered, the objectives of,
and the legal basis for this rule are
contained in the preamble to the
proposed and this final rule and are not
repeated here.
Summary of the Issues Raised by Public
Comments in Response to the IRFA. A
Summary of the Assessment of the
Agency of Such Issues, and a Statement
of Any Changes Made From the
Proposed Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
Comment A: One commenter
disputed the determination in the IRFA
that the economic loss to groundfish
fishery will only be $21 million. This
commenter claimed that the economic
impact will be much more. This
commenter suggested that the estimate
of lost groundfish revenue is not 19
percent of groundfish revenue, as
claimed in the IRFA, but rather 25–30
percent of 2005 groundfish revenue, as
he suspected that the total fishing
revenue for FY 2005 was only $80
million.
Response: The commenter did not
provide any specific information to
explain the basis for the disputed level
of impacts and, therefore, as
summarized below, NMFS supports the
conclusion of the FRFA. The impacts on
revenue in the IRFA are detailed in
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Section 7.2.4 of the EA prepared for this
action. As noted in the EA, the
economic impacts were compared to FY
2004, not FY 2005, because complete FY
2005 data were not available at the time
the analysis was completed. During FY
2004, the value of the total catch of
groundfish, not total fishing revenue,
was approximately $78 million. Of the
estimated loss of $21 million
attributable to measures proposed by
FW 42, $15 million is due to a reduction
in groundfish landings, while the
remaining $6 million is due to reduced
landings of other species. As a result,
compared to the estimated $78 million
in groundfish revenue landed in FY
2004, the estimated revenue loss of $15
million from FW 42 reflects a 19-percent
reduction in groundfish revenue from
FY 2004. It should be noted, however,
that these economic impacts are the
result of modeled impacts and may not
accurately reflect the realized impacts of
measures proposed by FW 42. Realized
impacts may be higher or lower than
these estimates, depending on how
vessels adapt to the regulations
implemented and how markets adjust to
the resulting changes in seafood supply.
Description of and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rule Would Apply
Any vessel that possesses a NE
multispecies permit would be required
to comply with the proposed regulatory
action. However, for the purposes of
determination of impacts, only vessels
that actually participated in an activity
during FY 2004 that would be affected
by the proposed action were considered
for analysis. Vessels that were inactive
were not considered because it is not
likely that the participation level will
increase in the future under the
proposed regulatory regime. During FY
2004, 1,002 permit holders had an
allocation of Category A DAS. Limited
access NE multispecies permit holders
may participate in both commercial and
charter/party activity without having an
open access NE multispecies charter/
party permit. In FY 2004, 705 entities
participated in the limited access
commercial groundfish fishery, and 6
participated in the open access charter/
party fishery for GOM cod. Four of these
entities participated in both commercial
and charter/party activities, leaving a
total of 707 unique vessels with an
allocation of Category A DAS that may
be affected by the proposed action.
Based on FY 2004 data, the proposed
action would have a potential impact on
a total of 3,216 limited and open access
groundfish permit holders, of which less
than one-third (976) actually
participated in either a commercial or
charter/party activity that would be
affected by the proposed action. Of
these, 858 commercial fishing vessels
would be affected by this proposed
action, including 132 limited access
monkfish Category C or D vessels that
fished in the Regular B DAS Pilot
Program during FY 2004–2005.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) size standard for small
commercial fishing entities is $4 million
in gross sales, and the size standard for
small charter/party operators is $6.5
million. Available data for FY 2004
gross sales show that the maximum
gross sales for any single commercial
fishing vessel was $1.8 million, and the
maximum gross sales for any affected
charter/party vessel was $1.0 million.
While an entity may own multiple
vessels, available data make it difficult
to determine which vessels may be
controlled by a single entity. For this
reason, each vessel is treated as a single
entity for purposes of size determination
and impact assessment. This means that
all commercial and charter/party fishing
entities would fall under the SBA size
standard for small entities and,
therefore, there is no differential impact
between large and small entities.
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Final Rule
The reporting requirements for this
final rule are as follows: This final rule
contains a collection-of-information
requirement subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) that has been
previously approved by OMB under
control numbers 0648–0202, and 0648–
0212. Public reporting burdens for these
collections of information are as
follows: (1) VMS purchase and
installation; (2) VMS proof of
installation; (3) spawning block
declaration; (4) automated VMS polling
of vessel position; (5) declaration of
intent to participate in the Regular B
DAS Program or fish in the U.S./Canada
Management Areas, associated SAPs,
and CA I SAP, and DAS to be used via
VMS prior to each trip into the Regular
B DAS Program or a particular SAP; (6)
notice requirements for observer
deployment prior to every trip into the
Regular B DAS Program or the U.S./
Canada Management Areas, associated
SAPs, and CA I SAP; (7) standardized
catch reporting requirements while
participating in the Regular B DAS
Program or fishing in the U.S./Canada
Management Area, associated SAPs, and
CA I SAP, respectively; (8) standardized
reporting of Universal Data I.D. while
participating in the Regular B DAS
Program or fishing in the U.S./Canada
Management Area, associated SAPs, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62181
CA I SAP; (9) Sector Manager daily
reports for CA I SAP; (10) DAS ‘‘flip’’
notification via VMS for the Regular B
DAS Program; (11) DAS Leasing
Program application; (12) declaration of
intent to fish inside and outside of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the same
trip; (13) vessel baseline downgrade
request for the DAS Leasing Program;
(14) annual declaration of participation
in the CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP;
(15) declaration of area and gear via
VMS when fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS; and (16) declaration
of entry into the GOM and SNE
Differential DAS Areas when not fishing
or transiting. The burdens associated
with these information collections
include the time required for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Description of Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statues
The alternative selected will continue
the Amendment 13 default DAS
allocations that took effect on May 1,
2006, under the emergency action;
specify Target TACs and Incidental
Catch TACs for FYs 2006, 2007, and
2008; implement a VMS requirement for
limited access groundfish DAS vessels;
implement differential DAS counting in
specific areas of the GOM and SNE;
modify the recreational possession
restrictions and size limits for GOM cod;
modify current and implement new
commercial trip limits for several
species; renew and modify the Regular
B DAS Program, including the rules
pertaining to monkfish vessels; renew
and modify the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP; renew the DAS Leasing
Program; modify the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP; authorize the formation
of the Fixed Gear Sector; provide
flexibility for vessels to fish inside and
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
on the same trip; modify reporting
requirements for Special Management
Programs; modify the DAS Transfer
Program; modify the cod trip limit for
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area;
implement Gear Performance Incentives
for the haddock separator trawl; and
modify the trawl codend mesh size
requirement in the SNE RMA.
The primary purpose of this action is
to implement a rebuilding program for
GB yellowtail flounder and modify NE
multispecies fishery management
measures to reduce F on six other
groundfish stocks in order to maintain
compliance with the rebuilding program
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62182
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
of the FMP. FW 42 also modifies and
continues specific measures to mitigate
the economic and social impacts of the
FMP and allow harvest levels to
approach OY.
The alternative that was adopted and
implemented achieves the biological
goals of FW 42, while minimizing the
negative economic and social impacts.
The principal feature that distinguishes
one alternative from another is the
strategy each alternative proposes to
reduce F. As such, this discussion
focuses on the measures designed to
reduce F. Although all alternatives, with
the exception of the No Action
alternative, would have complied with
the legal requirement to reduce F, the
alternatives were not equal with respect
to their compliance with the mandate to
minimize negative social and economic
impacts. The FW 42 analyses (Table 193
in the FW 42 document) indicate that
the selected alternative will result in the
least amount of reduction in total
revenue for affected vessels (in dollars),
and result in the least percentage
decline in groundfish revenue, when
compared with other alternatives. In
addition, based on public testimony, the
selected alternative was believed to
promote safety better than another
alternative that also had relatively low
economic impacts when compared with
all of the alternatives. The conclusion
that the selected alternative was
superior with respect to the potential
estimated negative economic impacts
was the primary reason this particular
alternative was selected and approved.
Implementation of the selected
alternative will result in minimization
of negative impacts on small entities.
Although the No Action alternative
would have resulted in less negative
economic impact, the No Action
alternative does not comply with the
legal requirements of the MagnusonStevens Act regarding conservation
since F would not be sufficiently
reduced.
The GB yellowtail flounder rebuilding
program implements a strategy and
timeline for rebuilding this stock and
complies with the legal requirements of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Because the
current regulations implementing the
U.S./Canada Resource Sharing
Understanding (Understanding)
effectively control F on this stock, the
rebuilding program does not represent a
new restriction that has a negative
impact on small entities. However, the
rebuilding program is binding, in a
manner in which the Understanding is
not. The No Action alternative would
not be in compliance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The GB
yellowtail flounder rebuilding strategy
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
implemented through this final rule was
preferred over the non-selected
alternatives because it is consistent with
the rebuilding time periods of most of
the stocks in the FMP, and has a higher
probability associated with rebuilding.
This is an adaptive rebuilding plan,
effectively balancing the need to
minimize impacts to the fishing
industry while rebuilding the stock, and
therefore minimizing impacts to small
entities to the extent practicable.
Implementation of Target and
Incidental TACs provide important tools
for the functioning of the FMP by
enabling harvest of various stocks in a
manner consistent with the goals of the
FMP. The No Action alternative would
not enable the revised Target and
Incidental TACs based on the best
scientific information available to be
used to informally evaluate the fishery.
Furthermore, because revised Incidental
Catch TACs were not proposed under
the No Action alternative, that
alternative would not have provided the
necessary protection for stocks of
concern. Without Incidental Catch
TACs, either the Special Management
Programs would not be allowed to open
(and the associated revenue would be
lost), or such programs would operate
without the necessary restrictions that
ensure compliance with the biological
objectives of the FMP.
The implemented measure that allows
flexibility for vessels to fish both inside
and outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip decreases the
chance that vessels fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area will have an
unprofitable trip and, therefore, serves
to further minimize negative impacts on
small entities.
The requirement that all limited
access groundfish DAS vessels using a
groundfish DAS must be equipped with
an approved VMS was selected in order
to support the monitoring, reporting,
and enforcement of the increasingly
complex measures under the FMP.
Although implementation of the VMS
requirement will result in additional
costs to the active members of the
groundfish fleet (all of which are small
entities), one of the primary reasons the
regulations are so complex is to
accommodate the extremely diverse
characteristics and interests of the
fishery. For example, in the SNE and
GOM RMAs the use of VMS enables
NMFS to administer and enforce
complex rules that charge vessels DAS
at different rates depending upon where
the vessel fishes. Vessels that do not fish
in the geographic areas associated with
the stocks that require the largest
reduction in fishing effort are not
subject to the same restrictions as those
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
vessels that do fish in such areas. The
differential DAS system is designed to
reduce F on several fish stocks, while
allowing vessel owners choices
regarding where to fish and the amount
of DAS costs to incur. Although it is not
possible to precisely quantify economic
gains that result from the use of VMS,
selection of the VMS alternative
supports the complex regulations that
are designed to allow the fishery to
approach OY. For example, it may have
been possible to implement Alternative
5 without a VMS requirement, because
Alternative 5 does not include
differential DAS counting by areas, but
relies instead on a larger reduction in
allocated Category A DAS. However,
economic impacts of Alternative 5 are
greater than those associated with either
of the differential DAS alternatives.
Although all the alternatives for
recreational and charter/party measures
were designed to achieve the same
percentage in F reductions for GOM cod
as for the commercial sector, the
preferred alternative was selected in
order to minimize impacts on the
recreational and charter/party fisheries.
Although impacts on charter/party
operators depend on how their potential
clients react to the regulatory changes,
the analysis suggests that the selected
alternative will have less harmful
economic impacts then the two nonselected alternatives. Part of the reason
for the different economic impacts is the
different months encompassed by the
alternatives and the traditional
seasonality of the recreational and
charter/party fisheries. The No Action
alternative is not justified because the
recreational and charter/party fisheries
have contributed to the excessive F rate
on GOM cod, and therefore must
contribute to the necessary reductions
in F under FW 42. If the No Action
alternative were selected, the
commercial sector would have had to
adopt even more restrictive regulations
to reduce fishing mortality on GOM cod
than those implemented by the final
rule.
All of the alternatives, with the
exception of the No-Action alternative,
include various trip limits for some of
the stocks in need of F reductions. Such
trip limits, in conjunction with the DAS
strategies in the various alternatives,
serve to mitigate the amount of DAS
restrictions necessary. The no action
alternative, which proposes no change
to the trip limits, would not have met
the biological requirements of the FMP.
All of the alternatives, with the
exception of the No-Action alternative,
include the renewal and/or modification
of the Special Management Programs
(CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, Eastern
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP, Regular B
DAS Program). These programs were
renewed and/or modified in order to
continue to mitigate the negative
economic impacts of the FMP and
enable the fishery to approach OY. By
renewing and modifying these Special
Management Programs, vessels are
allowed to access fish stocks in a
restricted manner that protects stocks of
concern. In contrast, yield and revenue
from the fishery would have been
reduced under the No Action alternative
because that alternative would not have
provided enhanced access to various
stocks. The DAS Leasing Program
provides additional economic
opportunity for vessels, as it may have
an important role in maintaining
profitability for small entities, and the
revision of the DAS Transfer Program
provides additional incentive to
participate in the program and,
therefore, provides different types of
economic opportunities for vessel
owners. Both of these programs
minimize the negative impacts of FW 42
by providing economic opportunities for
the groundfish fleet, which the No
Action alternative would not provide.
Other management measures
implemented by this final rule, such as
standardization of reporting
requirements, modification of Regional
Administrator Authority, Gear
Performance Incentives, modification to
the cod trip limit for the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area, and the change in the
minimum trawl mesh requirement when
fishing in the SNE RMA, serve to
improve and facilitate the functioning of
the FMP and increase the likelihood
that the regulations will have the
intended effects. As such, the
alternative selected and implemented
has a beneficial economic impact on
small entities when compared with the
No Action Alternative.
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Final Rule
1. VMS purchase and installation,
OMB# 0648–0202 (1 hr/response);
2. VMS proof of installation, OMB#
0648–0202 (5 min/response);
3. Spawning block declaration, OMB#
0648–0202 (2 min/response);
4. Automated VMS polling of vessel
position, OMB# 0648–0202 (5 sec/
response);
5. Declaration of intent to participate
in the Regular B DAS Program or fish in
the U.S./Canada Management Area,
associated SAPs, and CA I SAP, and
DAS to be used via VMS prior to each
trip into the Regular B DAS Program or
a particular SAP, OMB# 0648–0202 (5
min/response);
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
6. Notice requirements for observer
deployment prior to every trip into the
Regular B DAS Program or the U.S./
Canada Management Area, associated
SAPs, and CA I SAP, OMB# 0648–0202
(2 min/response);
7. Standardized catch reporting
requirements while participating in the
Regular B DAS Program or fishing in the
U.S./Canada Management Area,
associated SAPs, and CA I SAP,
respectively, OMB# 0648–0212 (15 min/
response);
8. Standardized reporting of Universal
Data I.D. while participating in the
Regular B DAS Program or fishing in the
U.S./Canada Management Area,
associated SAPs, and CA I SAP, OMB#
0648–0212 (15 min/response);
9. Sector Manager daily reports for CA
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, OMB# 0648–
0212 (2 hr/response);
10. DAS ‘‘flip’’ notification via VMS
for the Regular B DAS Program, OMB#
0648–0202 (5 min/response);
11. DAS Leasing Program application,
OMB# 0648–0475 (10 min/response);
12. Declaration of intent to fish inside
and outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip, OMB# 0648–0202
(5 min/response);
13. Vessel baseline downgrade request
for the DAS Leasing Program, OMB#
0648–0202 (1 hr/response);
14. Annual declaration of
participation in the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP, OMB #0648–0202 (2
min/response);
15. Declaration of area and gear via
VMS when fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS, OMB# 0648–0202 (5
min/response); and
16. Declaration of entry into the GOM
and SNE Differential DAS Area when
not fishing or transiting via VMS, OMB#
0648–0202 (5 min/response).
These estimates include the time
required for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding these burden
estimates or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burdern, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62183
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as small entity
compliance guide (the guide) was
prepared. Copies of this final rule are
available from the Northeast Regional
Office, and the guide, i.e., permit holder
letter, will be sent to all holders of
permits for the multispecies and
monkfish fisheries. The guide and this
final rule will be available upon request.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 16, 2006.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
50 CFR part 648 is amended as follows:
I
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.2, a new definition for
‘‘Jigging’’ is added and the definition for
‘‘Regulated species’’ is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 648.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Jigging, with respect to the NE
multispecies fishery, means fishing for
regulated species with handgear,
handline, or rod and reel using a jig,
which is a weighted object attached to
the bottom of the line used to sink the
line and/or imitate a baitfish, which is
moved (‘‘jigged’’) with an up and down
motion.
*
*
*
*
*
Regulated species, means the subset
of NE multispecies that includes
Atlantic cod, witch flounder, American
plaice, yellowtail flounder, haddock,
pollock, winter flounder, windowpane
flounder, redfish, and white hake, also
referred to as regulated NE multispecies.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 648.10, paragraphs (b)(1)(vii)
and (viii) are removed and reserved;
paragraphs (b)(1)(v), (vi), (b)(2) and (3),
the introductory text to paragraph (c),
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62184
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and paragraphs (c)(5), (d), and (f) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.10 DAS and VMS notification
requirements.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish, Occasional scallop, or
Combination permit, whose owner
elects to provide the notifications
required by this paragraph (b), unless
otherwise authorized or required by the
Regional Administrator under paragraph
(d) of this section; and
(vi) A vessel issued a limited access
NE multispecies permit that fishes
under a NE multispecies Category A or
B DAS.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The owner of such a vessel
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, with the exception of a vessel
issued a limited access NE multispecies
permit as specified in paragraph
(b)(1)(vi) of this section, must provide
documentation to the Regional
Administrator at the time of application
for a limited access permit that the
vessel has an operational VMS unit
installed on board that meets the
minimum performance criteria, unless
otherwise allowed under this paragraph
(b). If a vessel has already been issued
a limited access permit without the
owner providing such documentation,
the Regional Administrator shall allow
at least 30 days for the vessel to install
an operational VMS unit that meets the
criteria and for the owner to provide
documentation of such installation to
the Regional Administrator. The owner
of a vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit that fishes or
intends to fish under a Category A or B
DAS as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(vi)
of this section, must provide
documentation to the Regional
Administrator that the vessel has an
operational VMS unit installed on board
that meets those criteria prior to fishing
under a groundfish DAS. NMFS shall
send letters to all limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit holders and
provide detailed information on the
procedures pertaining to VMS purchase,
installation, and use.
(i) A vessel that has crossed the VMS
Demarcation Line specified under
paragraph (a) of this section is deemed
to be fishing under the DAS program,
unless the vessel’s owner or authorized
representative declares the vessel out
(i.e., not fishing under the applicable
DAS program) of the scallop, NE
multispecies, or monkfish fishery, as
applicable, for a specific time period by
notifying the Regional Administrator
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
through the VMS prior to the vessel
leaving port, or unless the vessel’s
owner or authorized representative
declares the vessel will be fishing
exclusively in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area, as described in § 648.85(a)(3)(ii),
under the provisions of that program.
(ii) Notification that the vessel is not
under the DAS program must be
received prior to the vessel leaving port.
A vessel may not change its status after
the vessel leaves port or before it returns
to port on any fishing trip.
(iii) DAS counting for a vessel that is
under the VMS notification
requirements of this paragraph (b), with
the exception of vessels that have
elected to fish exclusively in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on a particular trip, as
described in this paragraph (b), begins
with the first location signal received
showing that the vessel crossed the
VMS Demarcation Line after leaving
port. DAS counting ends with the first
location signal received showing that
the vessel crossed the VMS Demarcation
Line upon its return to port. For those
vessels that have elected to fish
exclusively in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area pursuant to § 648.85(a)(3)(ii), the
requirements of this paragraph (b) begin
with the first 30-minute location signal
received showing that the vessel crossed
into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area and
end with the first location signal
received showing that the vessel crossed
out of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
upon beginning its return trip to port,
unless the vessel elects to also fish
outside the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on
the same trip, in accordance with
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A).
(iv) The Regional Administrator may
authorize or require the use of the callin system instead of using the use of
VMS, as described under paragraph (d)
of this section. Furthermore, the
Regional Administrator may authorize
or require the use of letters of
authorization as an alternative means of
enforcing possession limits, if VMS
cannot be used for such purposes.
(3)(i) A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish, occasional scallop, or
Combination permit must use the callin system specified in paragraph (c) of
this section, unless the owner of such
vessel has elected to provide the
notifications required by this paragraph
(b), through VMS as specified under
paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this section.
(ii) [Reserved].
(iii) A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish or Occasional scallop permit
may be authorized by the Regional
Administrator to provide the
notifications required by this paragraph
(b) using the VMS specified in this
paragraph (b). For the vessel to become
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
authorized, the vessel owner must
provide documentation to the Regional
Administrator at the time of application
for a limited access permit that the
vessel has installed on board an
operational VMS as provided under
§ 648.9(a). A vessel that is authorized to
use the VMS in lieu of the call-in
requirement for DAS notification shall
be subject to the requirements and
presumptions described under
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this
section. Vessels electing to use the VMS
do not need to call in DAS as specified
in paragraph (c) of this section. A vessel
that calls in is exempt from the
prohibition specified in § 648.14(c)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Call-in notification. The owner of
a vessel issued a limited access
monkfish or red crab permit who is
participating in a DAS program and who
is not required to provide notification
using a VMS, and a scallop vessel
qualifying for a DAS allocation under
the Occasional category and who has
not elected to fish under the VMS
notification requirements of paragraph
(b) of this section, and any vessel that
may be required by the Regional
Administrator to use the call-in program
under paragraph (d) of this section, are
subject to the following requirements:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Any vessel that possesses or lands
per trip more than 400 lb (181 kg) of
scallops; any vessel issued a limited
access NE multispecies permit subject to
the NE multispecies DAS program
requirements that possesses or lands
regulated NE multispecies, except as
provided in §§ 648.10(b)(2)(iii), 648.17,
and 648.89; any vessel issued a limited
access monkfish permit subject to the
monkfish DAS program and call-in
requirement that possess or lands
monkfish above the incidental catch trip
limits specified in § 648.94(c); and any
vessel issued a limited access red crab
permit subject to the red crab DAS
program and call-in requirement that
possesses or lands red crab above the
incidental catch trip limits specified in
§ 648.263(b)(1) shall be deemed to be in
its respective DAS program for purposes
of counting DAS, regardless of whether
the vessel’s owner or authorized
representative provides adequate
notification as required by paragraphs
(b) or (c) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Temporary authorization for use
of the call-in system. The Regional
Administrator may authorize or require,
on a temporary basis, the use of the callin system of notification specified in
paragraph (c) of this section, instead of
the use of the VMS. If use of the call-
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
in system is authorized or required, the
Regional Administrator shall notify
affected permit holders through a letter,
notification in the Federal Register, email, or other appropriate means.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Additional NE multispecies call-in
requirements—(1) Spawning season
call-in. With the exception of a vessel
issued a valid Small Vessel category
permit or the Handgear A permit
category, vessels subject to the
spawning season restriction described
in § 648.82 must notify the Regional
Administrator of the commencement
date of their 20-day period out of the NE
multispecies fishery through the IVR
system (or through VMS, if required by
the Regional Administrator) and provide
the following information: Vessel name
and permit number, owner and caller
name and phone number, and the
commencement date of the 20-day
period.
(2) Gillnet call-in. A vessel subject to
the gillnet restriction described in
§ 648.82 must notify the Regional
Administrator of the commencement of
its time out of the NE multispecies
gillnet fishery using the procedure
described in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
I 4. In § 648.14, paragraphs (a)(130),
(145), (146), (148), (151), (152), and
(156); the introductory text of paragraph
(c); paragraphs (c)(7), (25), (33), (49)
through (53), (55) through (65) and (78)
are revised; paragraphs (c)(48), (c)(54),
and (c)(79) are removed and reserved;
and paragraphs (a)(173) through (177),
(c)(23), (c)(81) through (88), (g)(4), and
(g)(5) are added to read as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(130) If declared into one of the areas
specified in § 648.85(a)(1), fish during
that same trip outside of the declared
area, unless in compliance with the
applicable restrictions specified under
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A) or (B).
*
*
*
*
*
(145) If fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP, exceed the
possession limits specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(F).
(146) If fishing under the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP, fish for,
harvest, possess, or land any regulated
NE multispecies from the area specified
in § 648.85(b)(8)(ii), unless in
compliance with the restrictions and
conditions specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(A) through (I).
*
*
*
*
*
(148) If fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS in the Eastern U.S./
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Canada Haddock SAP specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8), in the area specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(ii), and during the season
specified in § 648.85(b)(8)(iv), fail to
comply with the restrictions specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v).
*
*
*
*
*
(151) If fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8), fail to comply with the
reporting requirements specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(G).
(152) If fishing under the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8), fail to comply with the
observer notification requirements
specified in § 648.85(b)(8)(v)(C).
*
*
*
*
*
(156) If fishing under an approved
Sector, as authorized under § 648.87,
fish in the NE multispecies DAS
program in a given fishing year or, if
fishing under a NE multispecies DAS,
fish in an approved Sector in a given
fishing year, unless otherwise provided
under § 648.87(b)(1)(xii).
*
*
*
*
*
(173) Fail to notify NMFS via VMS
prior to departing the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area, when fishing inside and
outside of the area on the same trip, in
accordance with § 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)(1).
(174) When fishing inside and outside
of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the
same trip, fail to abide by the most
restrictive DAS counting, trip limits,
and reporting requirements that apply,
as described in § 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A) and
the other applicable area fished.
(175) If fishing inside the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area and in possession of
fish in excess of what is allowed under
more restrictive regulations that apply
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area,
fish outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip, as prohibited
under § 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A).
(176) If fishing under the GB Fixed
Gear Sector specified under
§ 648.87(d)(2), fish with gear other than
jigs, non-automated demersal longline,
handgear, or sink gillnets.
(177) Fail to comply with the
reporting requirements under
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)(2) when fishing
inside and outside of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area on a trip.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) In addition to the general
prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of
this chapter and in paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this section, it is unlawful for any
owner or operator of a vessel issued a
valid limited access NE multispecies
permit or letter under § 648.4(a)(1)(I),
unless otherwise specified in § 648.17,
to do any of the following:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62185
(7) Possess or land per trip more than
the possession or landing limits
specified under § 648.86(a), (e), (g), (h),
and (j), and under § 648.82(b)(5) or (6),
if the vessel has been issued a limited
access NE multispecies permit or open
access NE multispecies permit, as
applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(23) Fail to declare through VMS its
intent to be exempt from the GOM cod
trip limit under § 648.86(b)(1), as
required under § 648.86(b)(4), or fish
north of the exemption line if in
possession of more than the GOM cod
trip limit specified under § 648.86(b)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
(25) For vessels fishing in the NE
multispecies DAS program under the
provisions of § 648.10(c), the call-in
system, fail to remain in port for the
appropriate time specified in
§ 648.86(b)(1)(ii)(A), except for
transiting purposes, provided the vessel
complies with § 648.86(b)(3). For vessels
fishing in the NE multispecies DAS
program under the provisions of
§ 648.10(b), the VMS system, fail to
declare through VMS that insufficient
DAS have elapsed in order to account
for the amount of cod on board the
vessel as required under
§ 648.86(b)(1)(ii)(B).
*
*
*
*
*
(33) For vessels fishing in the NE
multispecies DAS program under the
provisions of § 648.10(c), the call-in
system, fail to remain in port for the
appropriate time specified in
§ 648.86(b)(2)(ii)(A), except for
transiting purposes, provided the vessel
complies with § 648.86(b)(3). For vessels
fishing in the NE multispecies DAS
program under the provisions of
§ 648.10(b), the VMS system, fail to
declare through VMS that insufficient
DAS have elapsed in order to account
for the amount of cod on board the
vessel as required under
§ 648.86(b)(2)(ii)(B).
*
*
*
*
*
(48) [Reserved]
(49) Discard legal-sized NE regulated
multispecies, ocean pout, or Atlantic
halibut while fishing under a Special
Access Program, as described in
§§ 648.85(b)(3)(xi), 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(H) or
648.85(b)(8)(v)(I).
(50) Discard legal-sized NE regulated
multispecies, ocean pout, Atlantic
halibut, or monkfish while fishing
under a Regular B DAS in the Regular
B DAS Program, as described in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(E).
(51) If fishing under a Regular B DAS
in the Regular B DAS Program, fail to
comply with the DAS flip requirements
of § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(E) if the vessel
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62186
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
harvests and brings on board more than
the landing limit for a groundfish stock
of concern specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(D), other groundfish
specified under § 648.86, or monkfish
under § 648.94.
(52) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program, fail to comply with the
restriction on DAS use specified in
§ 648.82(d)(2)(i)(A).
(53) If fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP Area, and other
portions of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP Area on the same trip, fail
to comply with the restrictions in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(A).
(54) [Reserved]
(55) If fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP Area under a
Category B DAS, fail to comply with the
DAS flip requirements of
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(I), if the vessel
possesses more than the applicable
landing limit specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(F) or under § 648.86.
(56) If fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP Area under a
Category B DAS, fail to have the
minimum number of Category A DAS
available as required under
§ 648.85(b)(8)(v)(J).
(57) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the requirements and
restrictions specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(A) through (F), (I), and
(J).
(58) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the VMS requirement
specified in § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(A).
(59) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the observer notification
requirement specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(B).
(60) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the VMS declaration
requirement specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(C).
(61) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the landing limits
specified in § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(D).
(62) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the no discard and DAS
flip requirements specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(E).
(63) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to comply with the minimum Category
A DAS and Category B DAS accrual
requirements specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(F).
(64) Use a Regular B DAS in the
Regular B DAS Program specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6), if the program has been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
closed as specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(H) or (b)(6)(vi).
(65) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), use
a Regular B DAS after the program has
closed, as required under
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(G) or (H).
*
*
*
*
*
(78) Fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP specified in
§ 648.85(b)(8), if the SAP is closed as
specified in § 648.85(b)(8)(v)(K) or (L).
(79) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(81) If fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program specified in § 648.85(b)(6), fail
to use a haddock separator trawl as
described under § 648.85(a)(3)(iii)(A).
(82) If fishing under a NE
multispecies Category A DAS in either
the GOM Differential DAS Area, or the
SNE Differential DAS Area defined
under § 648.82(e)(2)(i), fail to declare
into the area through VMS as required
under § 648.82(e)(2)(ii).
(83) If fishing under a NE
multispecies Category A DAS in one of
the Differential DAS Areas defined in
§ 648.82(e)(2)(i), and under the
restrictions of one or more of the Special
Management Programs under § 648.85,
fail to comply with the most restrictive
regulations.
(84) Fail to comply with the GB
yellowtail flounder trip limit specified
under § 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(C).
(85) For vessels fishing inside and
outside the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on
the same trip, fail to comply with the
most restrictive regulations that apply
on the trip as required under
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A).
(86) For vessels fishing inside and
outside the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on
the same trip, fail to notify NMFS via
VMS that it is electing to fish in this
manner, as required by
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)(1).
(87) Possess or land more white hake
than allowed under § 648.86(e).
(88) Possess or land more GB winter
flounder than allowed under § 648.86(j).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(4) If the vessel is a private
recreational fishing vessel, fail to
comply with the seasonal GOM cod
possession prohibition described in
§ 648.89(c)(1)(v) or, if the vessel has
been issued a charter/party permit or is
fishing under charter/party regulations,
fail to comply with the prohibition on
fishing under § 648.89(c)(2)(v).
(5) If fishing under the recreational or
charter/party regulations, fish for or
possess cod caught in the GOM
Regulated Mesh Area during the
seasonal GOM cod possession
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
prohibition under § 648.89(c)(1)(v) or
(c)(2)(v) or, fail to abide by the
appropriate restrictions if transiting
with cod on board.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 648.80, paragraph (b)(2)(i) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.80 NE multispecies regulated mesh
areas and restrictions on gear and methods
of fishing.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Vessels using trawls. Except as
provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (vi)
of this section, and unless otherwise
restricted under paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of
this section, the minimum mesh size for
any trawl net, not stowed and not
available for immediate use in
accordance with § 648.23(b), except
midwater trawl, on a vessel or used by
a vessel fishing under a DAS in the NE
multispecies DAS program in the SNE
Regulated Mesh Area is 6-inch (15.2-cm)
diamond mesh or 6.5-inch (16.5-cm)
square mesh, applied throughout the
body and extension of the net, or any
combination thereof, and 6.5-inch (16.5cm) square or diamond mesh applied to
the codend of the net, as defined under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. This
restriction does not apply to nets or
pieces of nets smaller than 3 ft (0.9 m)
x 3 ft (0.9 m), (9 sq ft (0.81 sq m)), or
to vessels that have not been issued a
NE multispecies permit and that are
fishing exclusively in state waters.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 648.82, paragraph (c)(1)(iv) is
removed; paragraphs (d)(2)(i)(A), the
introductory text to paragraph (d)(4),
paragraphs (e), (j)(1)(iii), (k)(1), (k)(3),
(k)(4)(iv), (k)(4)(xi)(B), (l) introductory
text, and paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (v)
are revised; and paragraphs (l)(1)(viii),
and (l)(1)(ix) are added to read as
follows:
§ 648.82 Effort-control program for NE
multispecies limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Restrictions on use. Regular B
DAS can only be used by NE
multispecies vessels in an approved
SAP or in the Regular B DAS Program
as specified in § 648.85(b)(6). Unless
otherwise restricted under the Regular B
DAS Program as described in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(i), vessels may fish under
both a Regular B DAS and a Reserve B
DAS on the same trip (i.e., when fishing
in an approved SAP as described in
§ 648.85(b)). Vessels that are required by
the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
to utilize a NE multispecies DAS, as
specified under § 648.92(b)(2), may not
elect to use a NE multispecies Category
B DAS to satisfy that requirement.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Criteria and procedure for not
reducing DAS allocations. The schedule
of reductions in NE multispecies DAS
shall not occur if the Regional
Administrator:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Accrual of DAS. (1) DAS shall
accrue to the nearest minute, and with
the exceptions described under this
paragraph (e) and paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of
this section, shall be counted as actual
time called, or logged into the DAS
program, consistent with the DAS
notification requirements specified at
§ 648.10(c)(5).
(2) Differential DAS. For a NE
multispecies DAS vessel that intends to
fish some or all of its trip, or fishes,
some or all of its trip other than for
transiting purposes, under a Category A
DAS in the GOM Differential DAS Area,
as defined in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(A) of
this section, or in the SNE Differential
DAS Area, as defined in paragraph
(e)(2)(i)(B) of this section, with the
exception of Day gillnet vessels, which
accrue DAS in accordance with
paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this section, each
Category A DAS, or part thereof, shall be
counted at the differential DAS rate
described in paragraph (e)(2)(iii) of this
section, and be subject to the
restrictions defined in this paragraph
(e).
(i) Differential DAS Areas. (A) GOM
Differential DAS Area. The GOM
Differential DAS Area is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
SNE DIFFERENTIAL DAS AREA
Point
N. lat.
SNED1 ......................
SNED2 ......................
SNED3 ......................
SNED4 ......................
SNED5 ......................
SNED6 ......................
SNED7 ......................
SNED8 ......................
SNED9 ......................
SNED10 ....................
SNED11 ....................
SNED12 ....................
SNED13 ....................
SNED14 ....................
SNED15 ....................
SNED16 ....................
41°05′
41°05′
41°00′
41°00′
40°50′
40°50′
40°40′
40°40′
40°30′
40°10′
40°00′
40°00′
40°15′
40°30′
40°55′
41°05′
W. long.
71°45′
70°00′
70°00′
69°30′
69°30′
70°20′
70°20′
70°30′
72°30′
73°00′
73°15′
73°40′
73°40′
73°00′
71°45′
71°45′
(ii) Declaration. With the exception of
vessels fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area, as described in
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A), a NE multispecies
DAS vessel that intends to fish, or fishes
under a Category A DAS in the GOM
Differential DAS Area or the SNE
Differential DAS Area, as described in
paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section, must,
prior to leaving the dock, declare
through the VMS, in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator, which specific
differential DAS area the vessel will fish
in on that trip. A DAS vessel that fishes
in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area and
intends to fish, or fishes, subsequently
in the GOM Differential DAS Area or the
SNE Differential DAS Area under
Category A DAS Area must declare its
intention to do so through its VMS prior
to leaving the Eastern U.S./Canada Area,
as specified in § 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)(3).
(iii) Differential DAS counting—(A)
Differential DAS counting when fishing
in the GOM Differential DAS Area. For
GOM DIFFERENTIAL DAS AREA
a NE multispecies vessel that intends to
fish, or fishes for some or all of its trip
Point
N. lat.
W. long.
other than for transiting purposes under
a Category A DAS in the GOM
GMD1 ..........
43°30′ Intersection with
Differential DAS Area, each Category A
Maine CoastDAS, or part thereof, shall be counted at
line.
the ratio of 2 to1 for the entire trip, even
GMD2 ..........
43°30′ 69°30′.
if only a portion of the trip is spent
GMD3 ..........
43°00′ 69°30′.
fishing in the GOM Differential DAS
GMD4 ..........
43°00′ 69°55′ eastern
Area. A vessel that has not declared its
boundary,
WGOM Closed
intent to fish in the GOM Differential
Area.
DAS Area and that is not transiting, as
GMD5 ..........
42°30′ 69°55′.
specified in paragraph (e)(2)(v) of this
GMD6 ..........
42°30′’ 69°30′.
section, may be in the GOM Differential
GMD7 ..........
41°30′ 69°30′.
DAS Area, provided the vessel’s fishing
GMD8 ..........
41°30′ 70°00′.
GMD9 .......... North to intersection with gear is stowed in accordance with the
Cape Cod, Massachusetts, provisions of § 648.23(b) for the entire
time the vessel is in the area, and the
coast and 70°00′ W.
vessel declares immediately upon
entering the GOM Differential DAS
(B) SNE Differential DAS Area. The
SNE Differential DAS Area is defined by Area, via VMS, that it is in the area. A
vessel that fishes in both the GOM
straight lines connecting the following
Differential Area and the SNE
points in the order stated:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62187
Differential DAS Area on the same trip
will be charged DAS at the rate of 2 to1
for the entire trip.
(B) Differential DAS counting when
fishing in the SNE Differential DAS
Area. For a NE multispecies DAS vessel
that intends to fish or fishes some or all
of its trip other than for transiting
purposes under a Category A DAS in the
SNE Differential DAS Area, each
Category A DAS, or part thereof, shall be
counted at the ratio of 2 to 1 for the
duration of the time spent in the SNE
Differential DAS Area, as determined
from VMS positional data. A vessel that
has not declared its intent to fish in the
SNE Differential DAS Area and that is
not transiting, as specified in paragraph
(e)(2)(v) of this section, may be in the
SNE Differential DAS Area, provided
the vessel’s fishing gear is stowed in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 648.23(b) for the entire time the vessel
is in the area and the vessel declares
immediately upon entering the SNE
Differential DAS Area, via VMS, that it
is in the area. A vessel that fishes in
both the GOM Differential Area and the
SNE Differential DAS Area on the same
trip will be charged DAS at the rate of
2:1 for the entire trip. If the Regional
Administrator requires the use of the
DAS call-in, as described under
§ 648.10(b)(2)(iv), a vessel that fishes
any portion of its trip in the SNE
Differential DAS Area will be charged
DAS at the rate of 2 to1 for the entire
trip.
(iv) Restrictions. A NE multispecies
vessel fishing under a Category A DAS
in one of the Differential DAS Areas
defined in paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this
section, under the restrictions of
paragraph (e)(2) of this section and
under the restrictions of one or more of
the Special Management Programs
under § 648.85 must comply with the
most restrictive DAS counting, trip
limits, and reporting requirements,
specified in this paragraph (e)(2) and in
§ 648.85, under the pertinent Special
Management Program.
(v) Transiting. A vessel may transit
the GOM Differential DAS Area and the
SNE Differential DAS Area, as defined
in paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section,
provided the gear is stowed in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 648.23(b).
(3) Regular B DAS Program 24-hr
clock. For a vessel electing to fish in the
Regular B DAS Program, as specified at
§ 648.85(b)(6), and that remains fishing
under a Regular B DAS for the entire
fishing trip (without a DAS flip), DAS
used shall accrue at the rate of 1 full
DAS for each calendar day, or part of a
calendar day fished. For example, a
vessel that fished on one calendar day
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62188
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. would be charged
24 hr of Regular B DAS, not 16 hr; a
vessel that left on a trip at 11 p.m. on
the first calendar day and returned at 10
p.m. on the second calendar day would
be charged 48 hr of Regular B DAS
instead of 23 hr, because the fishing trip
would have spanned 2 calendar days.
For the purpose of calculating trip limits
specified under § 648.86, the amount of
DAS deducted from a vessel’s DAS
allocation shall determine the amount of
fish the vessel can legally land. For a
vessel electing to fish in the Regular B
DAS Program, as specified at
§ 648.85(b)(6), while also fishing in one
of the Differential DAS Areas, defined in
(e)(2)(i) of this section, Category B DAS
shall accrue at the rate described in this
paragraph (e)(3), unless the vessel flips
to a Category A DAS, in which case the
vessel is subject to the pertinent DAS
accrual restrictions of paragraph
(e)(2)(iii) of this section for the entire
trip. For vessels electing to fish in both
the Regular B DAS Program, as specified
in § 648.85(b)(8), and in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area, as specified in
§ 648.85(a), DAS counting will begin
and end according to the DAS
accounting rules specified in
§ 648.10(b)(2)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Method of counting DAS. A Day
gillnet vessel fishing with gillnet gear
under a NE multispecies DAS shall
accrue DAS as follows:
(A) A Day gillnet vessel fishing with
gillnet gear that has elected to fish in the
Regular B DAS Program, as specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6), under a Category B DAS,
is subject to the DAS accrual provisions
of paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(B) A Day gillnet vessel fishing with
gillnet gear under a NE multispecies
Category A DAS, when not subject to
differential DAS counting as specified
under paragraph (e)(2) of this section,
shall accrue 15 hr of DAS for each trip
of more than 3 hr, but less than or equal
to 15 hr. Such vessel shall accrue actual
DAS time at sea for trips less than or
equal to 3 hr, or more than 15 hr.
(C) A Day gillnet vessel fishing with
gillnet gear under a NE multispecies
Category A DAS that is fishing in the
GOM Differential DAS Area and,
therefore, subject to differential DAS
counting as specified under paragraph
(e)(2)(iii)(A) of this section, shall accrue
DAS at a differential DAS rate of 2 to 1
for the actual hours used for any trip of
0–3 hr in duration, and for any trip of
greater than 7.5 hr. For such vessels
fishing from 3 to 7.5 hr duration, vessels
will be charged a full 15 hr. For
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
example, a Day gillnet vessel fishing in
the GOM Differential Area for 8 actual
hr would be charged 16 hours of DAS,
or if fishing for 5 actual hr would be
charged 15 hr of DAS.
(D) A Day gillnet vessel fishing with
gillnet gear under a NE multispecies
Category A DAS that is fishing in the
SNE Differential DAS Area and,
therefore, subject to differential DAS
counting as specified under paragraph
(e)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, shall accrue
DAS at a differential DAS rate of 2 to 1
for the actual hours that are in the SNE
Differential DAS Area that are from
0–3 hr in duration and greater than 7.5
hr. For hours in the SNE Differential
DAS Area that are over 3 hr and less
than or equal to 7.5 hr duration, a vessel
shall be charged a full 15 hr. For a Day
gillnet vessel that fishes both inside and
outside of the SNE Differential DAS
Area on the same trip, time fished
outside the area shall accrue on the
basis of actual time, unless otherwise
specified in this paragraph (j)(1)(iii). A
Day gillnet vessel fishing inside and
outside of the SNE Differential DAS
Area on the same trip shall not accrue
less DAS for the entire trip than would
a Day gillnet vessel fishing the same
amount of time outside of the SNE
Differential DAS Area for the entire trip
(accruing DAS as specified under
paragraph (j)(1)(iii)(B) of this section).
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(1) Program description. Eligible
vessels, as specified in paragraph (k)(2)
of this section, may lease Category A
DAS to and from other eligible vessels,
in accordance with the restrictions and
conditions of this section. The Regional
Administrator has final approval
authority for all NE multispecies DAS
leasing requests.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Application to lease NE
multispecies DAS. To lease Category A
DAS, the eligible Lessor and Lessee
vessel must submit a completed
application form obtained from the
Regional Administrator. The application
must be signed by both Lessor and
Lessee and be submitted to the Regional
Office at least 45 days before the date on
which the applicants desire to have the
leased DAS effective. The Regional
Administrator will notify the applicants
of any deficiency in the application
pursuant to this section. Applications
may be submitted at any time prior to
the start of the fishing year or
throughout the fishing year in question,
up until the close of business on March
1. Eligible vessel owners may submit
any number of lease applications
throughout the application period, but
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
any DAS may only be leased once
during a fishing year.
(4) * * *
(iv) Maximum number of DAS that
can be leased. A Lessee may lease
Category A DAS in an amount up to
such vessel’s 2001 fishing year
allocation (excluding carry-over DAS
from the previous year, or additional
DAS associated with obtaining a Large
Mesh permit). For example, if a vessel
was allocated 88 DAS in the 2001
fishing year, that vessel may lease up to
88 Category A DAS. The total number of
Category A DAS that the vessel could
fish would be the sum of the 88 leased
DAS and the vessel’s current allocation
of Category A DAS.
*
*
*
*
*
(xi) * * *
(B) Duration and applicability of onetime DAS Leasing Program baseline
downgrade. The downgraded DAS
Leasing Program baseline remains in
effect until the DAS Leasing Program
expires or the permit is transferred to
another vessel via a vessel replacement,
or through a DAS transfer unless
otherwise specified in this paragraph
(k)(4)(xi)(B). Once the permit is
transferred to another vessel, the DAS
Leasing Program baseline reverts to the
baseline horsepower and length overall
specifications associated with the
permit prior to the one-time downgrade,
unless otherwise specified. Once the
DAS Leasing Program baseline is
downgraded for a particular permit, no
further downgrades may be authorized
for that permit. The downgraded DAS
Leasing Program baseline may only be
used to determine eligibility for the DAS
Leasing Program and does not affect or
change the baseline associated with the
DAS Transfer Program specified in
paragraph (l)(1)(ii) of this section, or the
vessel replacement or upgrade
restrictions specified at
§ 648.4(a)(1)(i)(E) and (F), or any other
provision respectively. For vessels
involved in a DAS Transfer Program
transaction as described in paragraph (l)
of this section, if the transferee vessel
baseline is adopted, consistent with the
regulations under paragraph (l)(1)(ii) of
this section, and the DAS Leasing
Program baseline of the transferee vessel
was previously downgraded, consistent
with the regulations under this
paragraph (k)(4)(xi), the downgraded
DAS Leasing Program baseline
specifications remain valid.
(l) DAS Transfer Program. Except for
vessels fishing under a sector allocation
as specified in § 648.87, or a vessel that
acted as a lessee or lessor in the DAS
Leasing Program transaction, a vessel
issued a valid limited access NE
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
multispecies permit may transfer all of
its NE multispecies DAS for an
indefinite time to another vessel with a
valid NE multispecies permit, in
accordance with the conditions and
restrictions described under this
section. The Regional Administrator has
final approval authority for all NE
multispecies DAS transfer requests.
(1) DAS transfer conditions and
restrictions. (i) The transferor vessel
must transfer all of its DAS. Upon
approval of the DAS transfer, all history
associated with the transferred NE
multispecies DAS (moratorium right
history, DAS use history, and catch
history) shall be associated with the
permit rights of the transferee. Neither
the individual permit history elements,
nor total history associated with the
transferred DAS may be retained by the
transferor.
(ii) NE multispecies DAS may be
transferred only to a vessel with a
baseline main engine horsepower rating
that is no more than 20 percent greater
than the baseline engine horsepower of
the transferor vessel. NE multispecies
DAS may be transferred only to a vessel
with a baseline length overall that is no
more than 10 percent greater than the
baseline length overall of the transferor
vessel. For the purposes of this program,
the baseline horsepower and length
overall are those associated with the
permit as of January 29, 2004. Upon
approval of the transfer, the baseline of
the transferee vessel would be the
smaller baseline of the two vessels or, if
the transferee vessel had not previously
upgraded under the vessel replacement
rules, the vessel owner could choose to
adopt the larger baseline of the two
vessels, which would constitute the
vessel’s one-time upgrade, if such
upgrade is consistent with the vessel
replacement rules. A vessel that has
executed a one-time downgrade of a
DAS Leasing Program baseline in
accordance with paragraph (k)(4)(xi) is
subject to the restrictions of paragraph
(k)(4)(xi)(B) of this section.
(iii) The transferor vessel must
transfer all of its Federal limited access
permits for which it is eligible to the
transferee vessel in accordance with the
vessel replacement restrictions under
§ 648.4, or permanently cancel such
permits. When duplicate permits exist,
i.e, those permits for which both the
transferor and transferee vessel are
eligible, one of the duplicate permits
must be permanently cancelled.
(iv) For the purpose of calculating the
DAS conservation tax as described in
this paragraph (l), the applicants must
specify which DAS (the transferor’s
DAS or the transferee’s DAS) are subject
to the DAS reduction. NE multispecies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
Category A and Category B DAS, as
defined under paragraphs (d)(1) and (2)
of this section, shall be reduced by 20
percent upon transfer. Category C DAS,
as defined under paragraph (d)(3) of this
section, shall be reduced by 90 percent
upon transfer.
(v) In any particular fishing year, a
vessel may not execute a DAS transfer
as a transferor if it previously
participated in the DAS Leasing
Program as either a lessee or a lessor, as
described under paragraph (k) of this
section. A vessel may participate in
DAS lease transaction (as a lessee or a
lessor) and submit an application for a
DAS transfer (as a transferor) during the
same fishing year, but the transfer, if
approved, would not be effective until
the beginning of the following fishing
year. Other combinations of activities
under the DAS Leasing and DAS
Transfer programs are permissible
during the same fishing year (i.e., act as
a transferee, or act as transferor and
subsequently conduct a DAS lease).
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) A vessel with a NE multispecies
limited access Category D permit may
transfer DAS only to a vessel with a NE
multispecies limited access Category D
permit, but may receive transferred DAS
from any eligible NE multispecies
vessel.
(ix) A vessel with a DAS allocation
resulting from a DAS Transfer in
accordance with this paragraph (l) may
acquire, through leasing, up to the sum
of the DAS allocations for the 2001
fishing year, associated with the
transferred and original DAS (excluding
carry-over DAS from the previous year,
or additional DAS associated with
obtaining a Large Mesh permit), in
accordance with the restrictions of
paragraph (k) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 648.85, paragraphs (a)(3)(ii)(A);
(a)(3)(iv)(A); (a)(3)(iv)(C)(1) and (2);
(a)(3)(iv)(D); (a)(3)(v); (b)(3)(xi); (b)(5);
(b)(6)(iii); (b)(6)(iv)(C) through (F), (H),
and (I); (b)(6)(v)(C) and (E); (b)(6)(vi);
(b)(7)(iv)(F) through (H); (b)(7)(v)(D);
(b)(7)(vi)(D); the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(8); (b)(8)(i) and (iv);
introductory text of paragraph
(b)(8)(v)(A); (b)(8)(v)(A)(2) through (4);
and (b)(8)(v)(E), (F), (H), (I) and (K) are
revised; paragraphs (b)(6)(ii) and
(b)(8)(iii) are removed and reserved; and
paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) is added to read
as follows:
§ 648.85
*
PO 00000
Special Management Programs.
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
Frm 00035
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 4700
62189
(A) A vessel fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area may fish both inside and
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
on the same trip, provided it complies
with the most restrictive DAS counting,
trip limits, and reporting requirements
for the areas fished for the entire trip,
and provided it complies with the
restrictions specified in paragraphs
(a)(3)(ii)(A)(1) through (4) of this
section. On a trip when the vessel
operator elects to fish both inside and
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area,
all cod, haddock, and yellowtail
flounder caught on the trip shall count
toward the applicable hard TAC
specified for the U.S./Canada
Management Area.
(1) The vessel operator must notify
NMFS via VMS any time prior to
leaving the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
(including at the time of initial
declaration into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area) that it is also electing to fish
outside the Eastern U.S./Canada Area.
With the exception of vessels
participating in the Regular B DAS
Program and fishing under a Regular B
DAS, once a vessel that has elected to
fish outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area leaves the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area, Category A DAS shall accrue from
the time the vessel crosses the VMS
demarcation line at the start of its
fishing trip until the time the vessel
crosses the demarcation line on its
return to port, in accordance with
§ 648.10(b)(2)(iii).
(2) The vessel must comply with the
reporting requirements of the U.S./
Canada Management Area specified
under § 648.85(a)(3)(v) for the duration
of the trip.
(3) If the vessel fishes or intends to
fish in one of the Differential DAS Areas
defined under § 648.82(e)(2)(i), it must
declare its intent to fish in the specific
Differential DAS Area prior to leaving
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area, and must
not have exceeded the CC/GOM or SNE/
MA yellowtail flounder trip limits,
specified in § 648.86(g), for the
respective areas.
(4) If a vessel possesses yellowtail
flounder in excess of the trip limits for
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder or SNE/
MA yellowtail flounder, as specified in
§ 648.86(g), the vessel may not fish in
either the CC/GOM or SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder stock area during
that trip (i.e., may not fish outside of the
U.S./Canada Management Area).
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(A) Cod landing limit restrictions.
Notwithstanding other applicable
possession and landing restrictions
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62190
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
under this part, a NE multispecies
vessel fishing in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area described in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this section may not land
more than 500 lb (226.8 kg) of cod per
DAS, or any part of a DAS, up to 5,000
lb (2,268 kg) per trip. A vessel fishing
in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area may be
further restricted by participation in
other Special Management Programs as
required under this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(C) * * *
(1) Initial yellowtail flounder landing
limit. Unless further restricted under
paragraph (a)(3)(iv)(D) of this section
(gear performance incentives), or
modified pursuant to paragraph
(a)(3)(iv)(D), the initial yellowtail
flounder landing limit for each fishing
year is 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) per trip.
(2) Regional Administrator authority
to adjust the yellowtail flounder landing
limit mid-season. If, based upon
available information, the Regional
Administrator projects that the
yellowtail flounder catch may exceed
the yellowtail flounder TAC for a
fishing year, the Regional Administrator
may implement, adjust, or remove the
yellowtail flounder landing limit at any
time during that fishing year in order to
prevent yellowtail flounder catch from
exceeding the TAC or to facilitate
harvesting the TAC, in a manner
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act. If, based upon available
information, the Regional Administrator
projects that the yellowtail flounder
catch is less than 90 percent of the TAC,
the Regional Administrator may adjust
or remove the yellowtail flounder
landing limit at any time during the
fishing year in order to facilitate the
harvest of the TAC, in a manner
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act. The Regional
Administrator may specify yellowtail
flounder trip limits that apply to the
whole U.S./Canada Management Area or
to either the Western or Eastern Area.
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Other restrictions or in-season
adjustments. In addition to the
possession restrictions specified in
paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this section, the
Regional Administrator, in a manner
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act, may modify the gear
requirements, modify or close access to
the U.S./Canada Management Areas,
modify the trip limits specified under
paragraphs (a)(3)(iv)(A) through (C) of
this section, or modify the total number
of trips into the U.S./Canada
Management Area, to prevent overharvesting or facilitate achieving the
TAC. Such adjustments may be made at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
any time during the fishing year, or
prior to the start of the fishing year. If
necessary to give priority to using
Category A DAS versus using Category
B DAS, the Regional Administrator may
implement different management
measures for vessels using Category A
DAS than for vessels using Category B
DAS. If the Regional Administrator,
under this authority, requires use of a
particular gear type in order to reduce
catches of stocks of concern, unless
further restricted elsewhere in this part,
the following gear performance
incentives will apply: Possession of
flounders (all species combined),
monkfish, and skates is limited to 500
lb (226.8 kg)(whole weight) each (i.e., no
more than 500 lb (226.8 kg) of all
flounders, no more than 500 lb (226.8
kg) of monkfish, and no more than 500
lb (226.8 kg) of skates), and possession
of lobsters is prohibited.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Reporting. The owner or operator
of a NE multispecies DAS vessel must
submit reports via VMS, in accordance
with instructions provided by the
Regional Administrator, for each day of
the fishing trip when declared into
either of the U.S./Canada Management
Areas. The vessel must continue to
report daily, even after exiting the U.S./
Canada Management Area. The reports
must be submitted in 24-hr intervals for
each day, beginning at 0000 hr and
ending at 2400 hr, and must be
submitted by 0900 hr of the following
day, or as instructed by the Regional
Administrator. The reports must include
at least the following information:
(A) Total pounds of cod, haddock,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, American plaice, and
white hake kept; and total pounds of
cod, haddock, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, and white hake
discarded;
(B) Date fish were caught and
statistical area in which fish were
caught; and
(C) Vessel Trip Report (VTR) serial
number, as instructed by the Regional
Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(xi) No-discard provision and DAS
flips. A vessel fishing in the CA II
Yellowtail Flounder SAP, may not
discard legal-sized regulated NE
multispecies, Atlantic halibut, or ocean
pout. If a vessel fishing in the CA II
Yellowtail Flounder SAP exceeds an
applicable trip limit, the vessel must
exit the SAP. If a vessel operator fishing
in the CA II Yellowtail Flounder SAP
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
under a Category B DAS harvests and
brings on board more legal-sized
regulated NE multispecies, ocean pout,
or Atlantic halibut than the maximum
landing limits allowed per trip,
specified under paragraph (b)(3)(iv) or
(viii) of this section, or under § 648.86,
the vessel operator must immediately
notify NMFS via VMS to initiate a DAS
flip (from a Category B DAS to a
Category A DAS). Once this notification
has been received by NMFS, the vessel’s
entire trip will accrue as a Category A
DAS trip. For a vessel that notifies
NMFS of a DAS flip, the Category B
DAS that have accrued between the time
the vessel started accruing Category B
DAS (i.e., either at the beginning of the
trip, or at the time the vessel crossed
into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area) and
the time the vessel declared its DAS flip
will be accrued as Category A DAS, and
not Category B DAS.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Incidental Catch TACs. Unless
otherwise specified in this paragraph
(b)(5), Incidental Catch TACs shall be
specified through the periodic
adjustment process described in
§ 648.90, and allocated as described in
this paragraph (b)(5), for each of the
following stocks: GOM cod, GB cod, GB
yellowtail flounder, GB winter flounder,
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder, American
plaice, white hake, SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder, SNE/MA winter flounder, and
witch flounder. NMFS shall send letters
to limited access NE multispecies
permit holders notifying them of such
TACs.
(i) Stocks other than GB cod, GB
yellowtail flounder, and GB winter
flounder. With the exception of GB cod,
GB yellowtail flounder, and GB winter
flounder, the Incidental Catch TACs
specified under this paragraph (b)(5)
shall be allocated to the Regular B DAS
Program described in paragraph (b)(6) of
this section.
(ii) GB cod. The Incidental Catch TAC
for GB cod specified under this
paragraph (b)(5) shall be subdivided as
follows: 50 percent to the Regular B
DAS Program described in paragraph
(b)(6) of this section; 16 percent to the
CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP described
in paragraph (b)(7) of this section; and
34 percent to the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP described in paragraph
(b)(8) of this section.
(iii) GB yellowtail flounder and GB
winter flounder. Each of the Incidental
Catch TACs for GB yellowtail flounder
and GB winter flounder specified under
this paragraph (b)(5) shall be subdivided
as follows: 50 percent to the Regular B
DAS Program described in paragraph
(b)(6) of this section; and 50 percent to
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
described in paragraph (b)(8) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(ii) [Reserved].
(iii) Quarterly Incidental Catch TACs.
The Incidental Catch TACs specified in
accordance with paragraph (b)(5) of this
section shall be divided into quarterly
catch TACs as follows: The first quarter
shall receive 13 percent of the
Incidental Catch TACs and the
remaining quarters shall each receive 29
percent of the Incidental Catch TACs.
NMFS shall send letters to all limited
access NE multispecies permit holders
notifying them of such TACs.
(iv) * * *
(C) VMS declaration. To participate in
the Regular B DAS Program under a
Regular B DAS, a vessel must declare
into the Program via VMS prior to
departure from port, in accordance with
instructions provided by the Regional
Administrator. A vessel declared into
the Regular B DAS Program cannot fish
in an approved SAP described under
this section on the same trip. Mere
declaration of a Regular B DAS Program
trip does not reserve a vessel’s right to
fish under the Program, if the vessel has
not crossed the VMS demarcation line.
(D) Landing limits. Unless otherwise
specified in this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(D),
a NE multispecies vessel fishing in the
Regular B DAS Program described in
this paragraph (b)(6), and fishing under
a Regular B DAS, may not land more
than 100 lb (45.5 kg) per DAS, or any
part of a DAS, up to a maximum of
1,000 lb (454 kg) per trip, of any of the
following species/stocks: Cod, American
plaice, white hake, witch flounder,
SNE/MA winter flounder, GB winter
flounder, GB yellowtail flounder,
southern windowpane flounder, and
ocean pout, and may not land more than
25 lb (11.3 kg) per DAS, or any part of
a DAS, up to a maximum of 250 lb (113
kg) per trip of CC/GOM or SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder. In addition, trawl
vessels, which are required to fish with
a haddock separator trawl as specified
under paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) of this
section, and other gear that may be
required in order to reduce catches of
stocks of concern as described under
paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J) of this section, are
restricted to the following trip limits:
500 lb (227 kg) of all flatfish species
(American plaice, witch flounder,
winter flounder, windowpane flounder,
and GB yellowtail flounder), combined;
500 lb (227 kg) of monkfish (whole
weight); 500 lb (227 kg) of skates (whole
weight); and zero possession of lobsters,
unless otherwise restricted by
§ 648.94(b)(7).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
(E) No-discard provision and DAS
flips. A vessel fishing in the Regular B
DAS Program under a Regular B DAS
may not discard legal-sized regulated
species, ocean pout, Atlantic halibut, or
monkfish. This prohibition on
discarding does not apply in areas or
times where the possession or landing
of regulated species is prohibited. If
such a vessel harvests and brings on
board legal-sized regulated NE
multispecies, or Atlantic halibut in
excess of the allowable landing limits
specified in paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(D) of
this section or § 648.86, the vessel
operator must notify NMFS immediately
via VMS to initiate a DAS flip from a B
DAS to an A DAS. Once this notification
has been received by NMFS, the vessel
shall automatically be switched by
NMFS to fishing under a Category A
DAS for its entire fishing trip. Thus, any
Category B DAS that accrued between
the time the vessel declared into the
Regular B DAS Program at the beginning
of the trip (i.e., at the time the vessel
crossed the demarcation line at the
beginning of the trip) and the time the
vessel declared its DAS flip shall be
accrued as Category A DAS, and not
Regular B DAS. After flipping to a
Category A DAS, the vessel is subject to
the applicable trip limits specified
under § 648.86 or § 648.85(a) and may
discard fish in excess of the applicable
trip limits.
(F) Minimum Category A DAS and B
DAS accrual. For a vessel fishing under
the Regular B DAS Program, the number
of Regular B DAS that may be used on
a trip cannot exceed the number of
Category A DAS that the vessel has at
the start of the trip. If a vessel is fishing
in the GOM Differential DAS Area or the
SNE Differential DAS Area, as described
in § 648.82(e)(2)(i), the number of
Regular B DAS that may be used on a
trip cannot exceed the number of
Category A DAS that the vessel has at
the start of the trip divided by 2. For
example, if a vessel plans a trip under
the Regular B DAS Program into the
GOM Differential DAS Area and has 10
Category A DAS available at the start of
the trip, the maximum number of
Regular B DAS that the vessel may fish
under the Regular B Program is 5. A
vessel fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program for its entire trip shall accrue
DAS in accordance with § 648.82(e)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(H) Closure of Regular B DAS Program
and quarterly DAS limits. Unless
otherwise closed as a result of the
harvest of an Incidental Catch TAC as
described in paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(G) of
this section, or as a result of an action
by the Regional Administrator under
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62191
paragraph (b)(6)(vi) of this section, the
use of Regular B DAS shall, in a manner
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act, be prohibited when 500
Regular B DAS have been used during
the first quarter of the fishing year (MayJuly), or when 1,000 Regular B DAS
have been used during any of the
remaining quarters of the fishing year,
in accordance with § 648.82(e)(3).
(I) Reporting requirements. The owner
or operator of a NE multispecies DAS
vessel must submit catch reports via
VMS in accordance with instructions
provided by the Regional Administrator,
for each day fished when declared into
the Regular B DAS Program. The reports
must be submitted in 24-hr intervals for
each day, beginning at 0000 hr and
ending at 2400 hr. The reports must be
submitted by 0900 hr of the following
day. For vessels that have declared into
the Regular B DAS Program in
accordance with paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(C)
of this section, the reports must include
at least the following information:
Statistical area fished; total pounds of
haddock, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, American
plaice, and white hake kept; total
pounds of haddock, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, and white hake
discarded; date fish were caught; and
VTR serial number, as instructed by the
Regional Administrator. Daily reporting
must continue even if the vessel
operator is required to flip, as described
under paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(E) of this
section.
(J) Gear requirement—(1) Vessels
fishing with trawl gear in the Regular B
DAS Program must use a haddock
separator trawl as described under
paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, or
other type of gear if approved as
described under this paragraph
(b)(6)(iv)(J). Other gear may be on board
the vessel, provided it is stowed when
the vessel is fishing under the Regular
B DAS Program.
(2) The Regional Administrator may
authorize additional gear if the Council
first recommends to the Regional
Administrator, and the Regional
Administrator approves, gear standards
in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act. If the
Regional Administrator does not
approve any gear standards
recommended by the Council for use in
the Regular B DAS Program, NMFS
must provide a written rationale to the
Council regarding its decision not to do
so.
(v) * * *
(C) CC/GOM yellowtail flounder stock
area. The CC/GOM yellowtail flounder
stock area for the purposes of the
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62192
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Regular B DAS Program is the area
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
CC/GOM YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER
STOCK AREA
Point
N. lat.
W. long.
CCGOM1 ....
43°00′
CCGOM2 ....
CCGOM3 ....
CCGOM4 ....
CCGOM5 ....
CCGOM6 ....
CCGOM7 ....
CCGOM8 ....
CCGOM5 ....
CCGOM9 ....
CCGOM10 ..
CCGOM11 ..
43°00′
42°30′
42°30′
41°30′
41°30′
41°00′
41°00′
41°30′
41°30′
(1)
42°00′
CCGOM12 ..
42°00′
CCGOM13 ..
Intersection with
New Hampshire
Coastline.
70°00′.
70°00′.
69°30′.
69°30′.
69°00′.
69°00′.
69°30′.
69°30′.
70°00′.
70°00′.
Intersection with
east facing
shoreline of
Cape Cod,
Massachusetts.
Intersection with
west facing
shoreline of
Massachusetts.
70°00′
(2)
1 Intersection with south facing shoreline of
Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
2 Intersection with east facing shoreline of
Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
*
*
*
*
*
(E) SNE/MA yellowtail flounder stock
area. The SNE/MA yellowtail flounder
stock area for the purposes of the
Regular B DAS Program is the area
bounded on the north, east, and south
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
SNE/MA YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER
STOCK AREA
Point
N. lat.
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
SNEMA1 ...................
SNEMA2 ...................
SNEMA3 ...................
SNEMA4 ...................
SNEMA5 ...................
SNEMA6 ...................
SNEMA7 ...................
SNEMA8 ...................
SNEMA9 ...................
SNEMA10 .................
SNEMA11 .................
SNEMA12 .................
SNEMA13 .................
SNEMA14 .................
SNEMA15 .................
SNEMA16 .................
SNEMA17 .................
1 South
2 North
W. long.
40°00′
40°00′
40°30′
40°30′
41°00′
41°00′
41°30′
41°30′
41°00′
41°00′
41°30′
(1)
(2)
(3)
40°30′
40°30′
40°00′
74°00′
72°00′
72°00′
69°30′
69°30′
69°00′
69°00′
70°00′
70°00′
70°30′
70°30′
72°00′
72°00′
73°00′
73°00′
74°00′
74°00′
facing shoreline of Connecticut.
facing shoreline of Long Island, New
York.
3 South facing shoreline of Long Island, New
York.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
(vi) Closure of the Regular B DAS
Program. The Regional Administrator,
based upon information required under
§§ 648.7, 648.9, 648.10, or 648.85, and
any other relevant information may, in
a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, prohibit
the use of Regular B DAS for the
duration of a quarter or fishing year, if
it is projected that continuation of the
Regular B DAS Program would
undermine the achievement of the
objectives of the FMP or Regular B DAS
Program. Reasons for terminating the
program include, but are not limited to
the following: Inability to constrain
catches to the Incidental Catch TACs;
evidence of excessive discarding; a
significant difference in flipping rates
between observed and unobserved trips;
or insufficient observer coverage to
adequately monitor the program.
(7) * * *
(iv) * * *
(F) Haddock TAC. The maximum
total amount of haddock that may be
caught (landings and discards) in the
Closed Area I Hook Gear SAP Area in
any fishing year is based upon the size
of the TAC allocated for the 2004 fishing
year (1,130 mt live weight), adjusted
according to the growth or decline of the
western GB (WGB) haddock exploitable
biomass (in relationship to its size in
2004), according to the following
formula: BiomassYEAR X = (1,130 mt live
weight) x (Projected WGB Haddock
Exploitable BiomassYEAR X / WGB
Haddock Exploitable Biomass2004). The
size of the western component of the
stock is considered to be 35 percent of
the total stock size, unless modified by
a stock assessment. The Regional
Administrator shall specify the haddock
TAC for the SAP, in a manner consistent
with the Administrative Procedure Act.
(G) Trip restrictions. A vessel is
prohibited from deploying fishing gear
outside of the Closed Area I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP Area on the same fishing
trip on which it is declared into the
Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP,
and must exit the SAP if the vessel
exceeds the applicable landing limits
described in paragraph (b)(7)(iv)(H) of
this section.
(H) Landing limits. For all eligible
vessels declared into the Closed Area I
Hook Gear Haddock SAP described in
paragraph (b)(7)(i) of this section,
landing limits for NE multispecies other
than cod, which are specified at
paragraphs (b)(7)(v)(C) and (b)(7)(vi)(C)
of this section, are as specified at
§ 648.86. Such vessels are prohibited
from discarding legal-sized regulated NE
multispecies, Atlantic halibut, and
ocean pout, and must exit the SAP and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
cease fishing if any trip limit is achieved
or exceeded.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The
owner or operator of a Sector vessel
declared into the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP must submit reports
to the Sector Manager, with instructions
to be provided by the Sector Manager,
for each day fished in the Closed Area
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP Area. The
Sector Manager will provide daily
reports to NMFS, including at least the
following information: Total pounds of
haddock, cod, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, and white hake kept;
total pounds of haddock, cod, yellowtail
flounder, winter flounder, witch
flounder, American plaice, and white
hake discarded; date fish were caught;
and VTR serial number, as instructed by
the Regional Administrator. Daily
reporting must continue even if the
vessel operator is required to exit the
SAP as required under paragraph
(b)(7)(iv)(G) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
(D) Reporting requirements. The
owner or operator of a non-Sector vessel
declared into the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP must submit reports
via VMS, in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator, for each day
fished in the Closed Area I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP Area. The reports must be
submitted in 24-hr intervals for each
day fished, beginning at 0000 hr and
ending at 2400 hr. The reports must be
submitted by 0900 hr of the day
following fishing. The reports must
include at least the following
information: Total pounds of haddock,
cod, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, American
plaice, and white hake kept; total
pounds of haddock, cod, yellowtail
flounder, winter flounder, witch
flounder, American plaice, and white
hake discarded; date fish were caught;
and VTR serial number, as instructed by
the Regional Administrator. Daily
reporting must continue even if the
vessel operator is required to exit the
SAP as required under paragraph
(b)(7)(iv)(G) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock
SAP—(i) Eligibility. A vessel issued a
valid limited access NE multispecies
DAS permit, and fishing with trawl gear
as specified in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(E) of
this section, is eligible to participate in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP,
and may fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Haddock SAP Area, as described in
paragraph (b)(8)(ii) of this section,
during the season specified in paragraph
(b)(8)(iv) of this section, provided such
vessel complies with the requirements
of this section, and provided the SAP is
not closed according to the provisions
specified in paragraphs (b)(8)(v)(K) or
(L) of this section, or the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area is not closed as described
under paragraph (a)(3)(iv)(E) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) [Reserved].
(iv) Season. An eligible vessel may
fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP from August 1 through
December 31.
(v) * * *
(A) DAS use restrictions. A vessel
fishing in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP may elect to fish under a
Category A or Category B DAS, in
accordance with § 648.82(d)(2)(i)(A) and
the restrictions of this paragraph
(b)(8)(v)(A).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) A vessel that is declared into the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
described in paragraph (b)(8)(i) of this
section may fish, on the same trip, in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
Area and in the Closed Area II
Yellowtail Flounder Access Area,
described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section, under either a Category A DAS
or a Category B DAS.
(3) A vessel may choose, on the same
trip, to fish in either/both the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP Program and
the Closed Area II Yellowtail Flounder
Access Area, and in the portion of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area described in
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section that
lies outside of these two SAPs, provided
the vessel fishes under a Category A
DAS and abides by the VMS restrictions
of paragraph (b)(8)(v)(D) of this section.
Such a vessel may also elect to fish
outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
on the same trip, in accordance with the
restrictions of paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A) of
this section.
(4) A vessel that elects to fish in
multiple areas, as described in this
paragraph (b)(8)(v)(A), must fish under
the most restrictive DAS counting, trip
limits, and reporting requirements of the
areas fished for the entire trip, including
those in paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A)(3) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(E) Gear restrictions—(1) A NE
multispecies vessel fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP must
use the haddock separator trawl nets
authorized for the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area, as specified in paragraph
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
(a)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, or other type
of gear, if approved as described under
this paragraph (b)(8)(v)(E). No other type
of fishing gear may be on the vessel
when on a trip in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP, with the
exception of a flounder net, as described
in paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section,
provided that the flounder net is stowed
in accordance with § 648.23(b).
(2) The Regional Administrator may
authorize additional gear if the Council
first recommends to the Regional
Administrator, and the Regional
Administrator approves, gear standards
in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act. If the
Regional Administrator does not
approve any gear standards
recommended by the Council for use in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP,
NMFS must provide a written rationale
to the Council regarding its decision not
to do so.
(F) Landing limits. Unless otherwise
restricted, a vessel fishing any portion of
a trip in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP may not fish for, possess,
or land more than 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of
cod, per trip, regardless of trip length.
A NE multispecies vessel fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP is
subject to the haddock requirements
described under § 648.86(a), unless
further restricted under paragraph
(a)(3)(iv) of this section. A NE
multispecies vessel fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
under a Category B DAS may not land
more than 100 lb (45.5 kg) per DAS, or
any part of a DAS, of GB yellowtail
flounder and 100 lb (45.5 kg) of GB
winter flounder, up to a maximum of
500 lb (227 kg) of all flatfish species,
combined. Possession of monkfish
(whole weight), and skates (whole
weight) is limited to 500 lb (227 kg)
each, and possession of lobsters is
prohibited.
*
*
*
*
*
(H) Incidental TACs. The maximum
amount of GB cod, and the amount of
GB yellowtail flounder and GB winter
flounder, both landings and discards,
that may be caught when fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
Program in a fishing year by vessels
fishing under a Category B DAS, as
authorized in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(A), is
the amount specified in paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii) and (iii), respectively.
(I) No discard provision and DAS
flips. A vessel fishing in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP Program
may not discard legal-sized regulated
NE multispecies, Atlantic halibut, and
ocean pout. If a vessel fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62193
under a Category B DAS exceeds the
applicable maximum landing limit per
trip specified under paragraph
(b)(8)(v)(F) of this section, or under
§ 648.86, the vessel operator must retain
the fish and immediately notify NMFS
via VMS to initiate a DAS flip (from a
Category B DAS to a Category A DAS).
After flipping to a Category A DAS, the
vessel is subject to all applicable
landing limits specified under
§ 648.85(a) or § 648.86. If a vessel
fishing in this SAP while under a
Category B DAS or a Category A DAS
exceeds a trip limit specified under
paragraph (b)(8)(v)(F) of this section or
§ 648.86, or other applicable trip limit,
the vessel must immediately exit the
SAP area defined under paragraph
(b)(8)(ii) of this section for the
remainder of the trip. For a vessel that
notifies NMFS of a DAS flip, the
Category B DAS that have accrued
between the time the vessel started
accruing Category B DAS and the time
the vessel declared its DAS flip will be
accrued as Category A DAS, and not
Category B DAS.
*
*
*
*
*
(K) Mandatory closure of Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP. When the
Regional Administrator projects that one
or more of the TAC allocations specified
in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(H) of this section
has been caught by vessels fishing under
Category B DAS, NMFS shall prohibit
the use of Category B DAS in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP, through
publication in the Federal Register
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act. In addition, the closure
regulations described in paragraph
(a)(3)(iv)(E) of this section shall apply to
the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
8. In § 648.86, the section heading and
paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4),
(e), and (g) are revised; and paragraph (j)
is added, to read as follows:
I
§ 648.86 NE Multispecies possession
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) NE multispecies DAS vessels—(i)
Implementation and adjustments to the
haddock trip limit to prevent exceeding
the Target TAC. At any time prior to or
during the fishing year, if the Regional
Administrator projects that the Target
TAC for haddock will be exceeded in
that fishing year, NMFS may implement
or adjust, in a manner consistent with
the Administrative Procedure Act, a per
DAS possession limit and/or a
maximum trip limit in order to prevent
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
62194
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
exceeding the Target TAC in that fishing
year.
(ii) Implementation and adjustments
to the haddock trip limit to facilitate
harvest of the Target TAC. At any time
prior to or during the fishing year, if the
Regional Administrator projects that
less than 90 percent of the Target TAC
for that fishing year will be harvested,
NMFS may remove or adjust, in a
manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, a per
DAS possession limit and/or a
maximum trip limit in order to facilitate
a haddock harvest and enable the total
catch to approach the Target TAC for
that fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) GOM cod landing limit. (i) Except
as provided in paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and
(b)(4) of this section, or unless otherwise
restricted under § 648.85, a vessel
fishing under a NE multispecies DAS
may land only up to 800 lb (362.9 kg)
of cod during the first 24-hr period after
the vessel has started a trip on which
cod were landed (e.g., a vessel that starts
a trip at 6 a.m. may call out of the DAS
program at 11 a.m. and land up to 800
lb (362.9 kg), but the vessel cannot land
any more cod on a subsequent trip until
at least 6 a.m. on the following day). For
each trip longer than 24 hr, a vessel may
land up to an additional 800 lb (362.9
kg) for each additional 24-hr block of
DAS fished, or part of an additional
24-hr block of DAS fished, up to a
maximum of 4,000 lb (1,818.2 kg) per
trip (e.g., a vessel that has been called
into the DAS program for more than 24
hr, but less than 48 hr, may land up to,
but no more than, 1,600 lb (725.7 kg) of
cod). A vessel that has been called into
only part of an additional
24-hr block of a DAS (e.g., a vessel that
has been called into the DAS program
for more than 24 hr, but less than 48 hr)
may land up to an additional 800 lb
(362.9 kg) of cod for that trip, provided
the vessel complies with the provisions
of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section.
Cod on board a vessel subject to this
landing limit must be separated from
other species of fish and stored so as to
be readily available for inspection.
(ii) A vessel that has been called into
or declared into only part of an
additional 24-hr block may come into
port with and offload cod up to an
additional 800 lb (362.9 kg), provided
that the vessel operator, with the
exception of vessels fishing in one of the
two Differential DAS Areas under the
restrictions of § 648.82(e)(2)(i), complies
with the following:
(A) For a vessel that is subject to the
VMS provisions specified under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
§ 648.10(b), the vessel declares through
VMS that insufficient DAS have elapsed
in order to account for the amount of
cod onboard and, after returning to port,
does not depart from a dock or mooring
in port, unless transiting as allowed
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
until the rest of the additional 24-hr
block of the DAS has elapsed, regardless
of whether all of the cod on board is
offloaded (e.g., a vessel that has been in
the DAS program for 25 hr prior to
crossing the VMS demarcation line on
the return to port) may land only up to
1,600 lb (725.6 kg) of cod, provided the
vessel does not declare another trip or
leave port until 48 hr have elapsed from
the beginning of the trip).
(B) For a vessel that has been
authorized by the Regional
Administrator to utilize the DAS call-in
system, as specified under § 648.10(c),
in lieu of VMS, the vessel does not call
out of the DAS program as described
under § 648.10(c)(3) and does not depart
from a dock or mooring in port, unless
transiting as allowed in paragraph (b)(3)
of this section, until the rest of the
additional 24-hr block of DAS has
elapsed, regardless of whether all of the
cod on board is offloaded (e.g., a vessel
that has been called into the DAS
program for 25 hr at the time of landing
may land only up to 1,600 lb (725.6 kg)
of cod, provided the vessel does not call
out of the DAS program or leave port
until 48 hr have elapsed from the
beginning of the trip.
(2) GB cod landing and maximum
possession limits. (i) Unless otherwise
restricted under § 648.85 or the
provisions of paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, or unless exempt from the
landing limit under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section as authorized under the
Sector provisions of § 648.87, a NE
multispecies DAS vessel may land up to
1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of cod per DAS, or
part of a DAS, provided it complies with
the requirements specified at paragraph
(b)(4) of this section and this paragraph
(b)(2). A NE multispecies DAS vessel
may land up to 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of
cod during the first 24-hr period after
such vessel has started a trip on which
cod were landed (e.g., a vessel that starts
a trip at 6 a.m. may call out of the DAS
program at 11 a.m. and land up to 1,000
lb (453.6 kg) of cod, but the vessel
cannot land any more cod on a
subsequent trip until at least 6 a.m. on
the following day). For each trip longer
than 24 hr, a vessel may land up to an
additional 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of cod for
each additional 24-hr block of DAS
fished, or part of an additional 24-hr
block of DAS fished, up to a maximum
of 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) of cod per trip
(e.g., a vessel that has been called into
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the DAS program for more than 24 hr,
but less than 48 hr, may land up to, but
no more than, 2,000 lb (907.2 kg) of
cod). A vessel that has been called into
only part of an additional 24-hr block of
a DAS (e.g., a vessel that has been called
into the DAS program for more than 24
hr, but less than 48 hr) may land up to
an additional 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of cod
for that trip, provided the vessel
complies with the provisions of
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. Cod
on board a vessel subject to this landing
limit must be separated from other
species of fish and stored so as to be
readily available for inspection.
(ii) A vessel that has been called into
or declared into only part of an
additional 24-hr block may come into
port with and offload cod up to an
additional 1,000 lb (453.6 kg), provided
that the vessel operator, with the
exception of vessels fishing in one of the
two Differential DAS Areas under the
restrictions of § 648.82(e)(2)(i), complies
with the following:
(A) For a vessel that has been
authorized by the Regional
Administrator to utilize the DAS call-in
system as specified under § 648.10(c), in
lieu of VMS, the vessel does not call out
of the DAS program as described under
§ 648.10(c)(3) and does not depart from
a dock or mooring in port, unless
transiting, as allowed in paragraph (b)(3)
of this section, until the rest of the
additional 24-hr block of DAS has
elapsed, regardless of whether all of the
cod on board is offloaded (e.g., a vessel
that has been called into the DAS
program for 25 hr at the time of landing
may land only up to 2,000 lb (907.2 kg)
of cod, provided the vessel does not call
out of the DAS program or leave port
until 48 hr have elapsed from the
beginning of the trip.)
(B) For a vessel that is subject to the
VMS provisions specified under
§ 648.10(b), the vessel declares through
VMS that insufficient DAS have elapsed
in order to account for the amount of
cod onboard, and after returning to port
does not depart from a dock or mooring
in port, unless transiting, as allowed
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
until the rest of the additional 24-hr
block of the DAS has elapsed, regardless
of whether all of the cod on board is
offloaded (e.g., a vessel that has been in
the DAS program for 25 hr prior to
crossing the VMS demarcation line on
the return to port may land only up to
2,000 lb (907.2 kg) of cod, provided the
vessel does not declare another trip or
leave port until 48 hr have elapsed from
the beginning of the trip.)
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Exemption. A vessel fishing under
a NE multispecies DAS is exempt from
the landing limit described in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section when fishing south
of the Gulf of Maine Regulated Mesh
Area, defined in § 648.80(a)(1), provided
that it complies with the requirement of
this paragraph (b)(4).
(i) Declaration. With the exception of
vessels declared into the U.S./Canada
Management Area, as described under
§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii), a NE multispecies
DAS vessel that fishes or intends to fish
south of the line described in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section, under the cod trip
limits described under paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, must, prior to leaving the
dock, declare its intention to do so
through the VMS, in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the
Regional Administrator. In lieu of a
VMS declaration, the Regional
Administrator may authorize such
vessels to obtain a letter of
authorization. If a letter of authorization
is required, such vessel may not fish
north of the exemption area for a
minimum of 7 consecutive days (when
fishing under the multispecies DAS
program), and must carry the
authorization letter on board.
(ii) A vessel exempt from the GOM
cod landing limit may not fish north of
the line specified in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section for the duration of the trip,
but may transit the GOM Regulated
Mesh Area, provided that its gear is
stowed in accordance with the
provisions of § 648.23(b). A vessel
fishing north and south of the line on
the same trip is subject to the most
restrictive applicable cod trip limit.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) White hake. Unless otherwise
restricted under this part, a vessel
issued a NE multispecies DAS permit, a
limited access Handgear A permit, an
open access Handgear B permit, or a
monkfish limited access permit and
fishing under the monkfish Category C
or D permit provisions may land up to
500 lb (226.8 kg) of white hake per DAS,
or any part of a DAS, up to 5,000 lb
(2,268.1 kg) per trip.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Yellowtail flounder. (1) CC/GOM
and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder
landing limit. Unless otherwise
restricted under this part, a vessel
issued a NE multispecies DAS permit, a
limited access Handgear A permit, an
open access Handgear B permit, or a
monkfish limited access permit and
fishing under the monkfish Category C
or D permit provisions, and fishing
exclusively outside of the U.S./Canada
Management Area, as defined under
§ 648.85(a)(1), may land or possess on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
62195
board only up to 250 lb (113.6 kg) of
yellowtail flounder per DAS, or any part
of a DAS, up to a maximum possession
limit of 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) per trip. A
vessel fishing outside and inside of the
U.S./Canada Management Area on the
same trip is subject to the more
restrictive yellowtail flounder trip limit
(i.e., that specified by this paragraph (g))
or § 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(C).
(2) GB yellowtail flounder landing
limit. Unless otherwise restricted under
this part, a vessel issued a NE
multispecies DAS permit, a limited
access Handgear A permit, an open
access Handgear B permit, or a
monkfish limited access permit and
fishing under the monkfish Category C
or D permit provisions, and fishing in
the U.S./Canada Management Area
defined under § 648.85(a)(1) is subject to
the GB yellowtail flounder limit
described under paragraph
§ 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) GB winter flounder. Unless
otherwise restricted under this part, a
vessel issued a NE multispecies DAS
permit, a limited access Handgear A
permit, an open access Handgear B
permit, or a monkfish limited access
permit and fishing under the monkfish
Category C or D permit provisions, and
fishing in the U.S./Canada Management
Area defined under § 648.85(a)(1), may
not possess or land more than 5,000 lb
(2,268.1 kg) of GB winter flounder per
trip.
*
*
*
*
*
I 9. In § 648.87, paragraph (d)(2) is
added to read as follows:
permit are eligible to participate in the
GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector, provided
they have documented landings through
valid dealer reports submitted to NMFS
of GB cod during the fishing years 1996
to 2001, regardless of gear fished.
(ii) TAC allocation. For each fishing
year, the Sector’s allocation of that
fishing year’s GB cod TAC, up to a
maximum of 20 percent of the GB cod
TAC, will be determined as follows:
(A) Sum of the total accumulated
landings of GB cod by vessels identified
in the Sector’s Operations Plan specified
under paragraph (b)(2) of this section,
for the fishing years 1996 through 2001,
regardless of gear used, as reported in
the NMFS dealer database.
(B) Sum of total accumulated landings
of GB cod made by all NE multispecies
vessels for the fishing years 1996
through 2001, as reported in the NMFS
dealer database.
(C) Divide the sum of total landings of
Sector participants calculated in
paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) of this section by
the sum of total landings by all vessels
calculated in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(B) of
this section. The resulting number
represents the percentage of the total GB
cod TAC allocated to the GB Cod Fixed
Gear Sector for the fishing year in
question.
(iii) Requirements. A vessel fishing
under the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector
may not fish with gear other than jigs,
non-automated demersal longline, hand
gear, or sink gillnets.
I 10. In § 648.88, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.87
*
Sector allocation.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector. Eligible
NE multispecies DAS vessels, as
specified in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this
section, may participate in the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector within the area
defined as the GB Cod Hook Sector
Area, as specified under paragraph
(d)(1)(i) of this section, under the GB
Cod Fixed Gear Sector’s Operations
Plan, provided the Operations Plan is
approved by the Regional Administrator
in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, and provided that each
participating vessel and vessel operator
and/or vessel owner complies with the
requirements of the Operations Plan, the
requirements and conditions specified
in the Letter of Authorization issued
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section,
and all other requirements specified in
this section.
(i) Eligibility. All vessels issued a
limited access NE multispecies DAS
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 648.88 NE multispecies open access
permit restrictions.
*
*
*
*
(c) Scallop NE multispecies
possession limit permit. With the
exception of vessels fishing in the Sea
Scallop Access Areas as specified in
§ 648.59(b) through (d), a vessel that has
been issued a valid open access scallop
NE multispecies possession limit permit
may possess and land up to 300 lb
(136.1 kg) of regulated NE multispecies
when fishing under a scallop DAS
allocated under § 648.53, provided the
vessel does not fish for, possess, or land
haddock from January 1 through June
30, as specified under § 648.86(a)(2)(i),
and provided that the amount of
regulated NE multispecies on board the
vessel does not exceed any of the
pertinent trip limits specified under
§ 648.86, and provided the vessel has at
least one standard tote on board. A
vessel fishing in the Sea Scallop Access
Areas as specified in § 648.59(b) through
(d) is subject to the possession limits
specified in § 648.60(a)(5)(ii).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
62196
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
11. In § 648.89, paragraphs (b)(1),
(c)(1)(i), and (c)(2)(i) are revised, and
paragraphs (b)(3), (c)(1)(v), and (c)(2)(v)
are added to read as follows:
I
§ 648.89 Recreational and charter/party
vessel restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Minimum fish sizes. Unless further
restricted under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, persons aboard charter or party
vessels permitted under this part and
not fishing under the NE multispecies
DAS program, and recreational fishing
vessels in or possessing fish from the
EEZ, may not possess fish smaller than
the minimum fish sizes, measured in
total length (TL), as follows:
MINIMUM FISH SIZES (TL) FOR CHARTER, PARTY, AND PRIVATE RECREATIONAL VESSELS
Species
Cod ....................................
Haddock .............................
Pollock ...............................
Witch flounder (gray sole)
Yellowtail flounder .............
Atlantic halibut ...................
American plaice (dab) .......
Winter flounder (blackback)
Redfish ...............................
Sizes
22″
19″
19″
14″
13″
36″
14″
12″
9″
(58.4
(48.3
(48.3
(35.6
(33.0
(91.4
(35.6
(30.5
(22.9
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
cm)
*
*
*
*
(3) GOM cod. Private recreational
vessels and charter party vessels
described in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section may not possess cod smaller
than 24 inches (63.7 cm) in total length
when fishing in the GOM Regulated
Mesh Area specified under
§ 648.80(a)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Unless further restricted by the
Seasonal GOM Cod Possession
Prohibition specified under paragraph
mstockstill on PROD1PC76 with RULES2
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Oct 20, 2006
Jkt 211001
(c)(1)(v) of this section, each person on
a private recreational vessel may
possess no more than 10 cod per day in,
or harvested from, the EEZ.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Seasonal GOM cod possession
prohibition. Persons aboard private
recreational fishing vessels fishing in
the GOM Regulated Mesh Area specified
under § 648.80(a)(1) may not fish for or
possess any cod from November 1
through March 31. Private recreational
vessels in possession of cod caught
outside the GOM Regulated Mesh Area
may transit this area, provided all bait
and hooks are removed from fishing
rods and any cod on board has been
gutted and stored.
(2) * * *
(i) Unless further restricted by the
Seasonal GOM Cod Possession
Prohibition, specified under paragraph
(c)(2)(v) of this section, each person on
a private recreational vessel may
possess no more than 10 cod per day.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Seasonal GOM cod possession
prohibition. Persons aboard charter/
party fishing vessels fishing in the GOM
Regulated Mesh Area specified under
§ 648.80(a)(1) may not fish for or possess
any cod from November 1 through
March 31. Charter/party vessels in
possession of cod caught outside the
GOM Regulated Mesh Area may transit
this area, provided all bait and hooks
are removed from fishing rods and any
cod on board has been gutted and
stored.
*
*
*
*
*
I 12. In § 648.92, paragraph (b)(2)(i) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.92 Effort-control program for
monkfish limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Unless otherwise specified in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
monkfish DAS used by a limited access
NE multispecies or scallop DAS vessel
holding a Category C, D, F, G, or H
limited access monkfish permit shall
also be counted as a NE multispecies or
scallop DAS, as applicable, except when
a Category C, D, F, G, or H vessel with
a limited access NE multispecies DAS
permit has an allocation of NE
multispecies Category A DAS, specified
under § 648.82(d)(1), that is less than
the number of monkfish DAS allocated
for the fishing year May 1 through April
30. Under this circumstance, the vessel
may fish under the monkfish limited
access Category A or B provisions, as
applicable, for the number of DAS that
equal the difference between the
number of its allocated monkfish DAS
and the number of its allocated NE
multispecies Category A DAS. For such
vessels, when the total allocation of NE
multispecies Category A DAS has been
used, a monkfish DAS may be used
without concurrent use of a NE
multispecies DAS. For example, if a
monkfish Category D vessel’s NE
multispecies Category A DAS allocation
is 30, and the vessel fished 30 monkfish
DAS, 30 NE multispecies Category A
DAS would also be used. However, after
all 30 NE multispecies Category A DAS
are used, the vessel may utilize its
remaining 10 monkfish DAS to fish on
monkfish, without a NE multispecies
DAS being used, provided that the
vessel fishes under the regulations
pertaining to a Category B vessel and
does not retain any regulated NE
multispecies. A vessel holding a
Category C, D, F, G, or H limited access
monkfish permit may not use a NE
multispecies Category B DAS in order to
satisfy the requirement of this paragraph
(b)(2)(i) to use a NE multispecies DAS
concurrently with a monkfish DAS.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–8811 Filed 10–17–06; 4:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM
23OCR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 204 (Monday, October 23, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62156-62196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8811]
[[Page 62155]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 648
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act) Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States;
Northeast Multispecies Fishery, Framework Adjustment 42; Monkfish
Fishery, Framework Adjustment 3; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 204 / Monday, October 23, 2006 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 62156]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 060606150-6240-02; I.D. 053106A]
RIN 0648-AT24
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery, Framework Adjustment 42;
Monkfish Fishery, Framework Adjustment 3
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements Framework Adjustment (FW) 42 to the
Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and FW 3 to
the Monkfish FMP (Joint Framework). FW 42, developed by the New England
Fishery Management Council (Council), is a biennial adjustment to the
NE Multispecies FMP that sets forth a rebuilding program for Georges
Bank (GB) yellowtail flounder and modifies NE multispecies fishery
management measures to reduce fishing mortality rates (F) on six other
groundfish stocks in order to maintain compliance with the rebuilding
programs of the FMP. FW 42 also modifies and continues specific
measures to mitigate the economic and social impacts of Amendment 13 to
the FMP and to allow harvest levels to approach optimum yield (OY).
DATES: The emergency rule published on April 13, 2006 (71 FR 19348),
that was extended by a temporary rule published on October 6, 2006 (71
FR 59020), which is scheduled to expire on April 4, 2007, is instead
superseded by this final rule and expires at 12:01 a.m. on November 22,
2006. The amendments in this final rule become effective at 12:02 a.m.
on November 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of FW 42 and FW 3, the Regulatory Impact Review
(RIR), the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and the
Environmental Assessment (EA) are available from Paul J. Howard,
Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, The Tannery, B-Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
The FRFA consists of the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), public comments and responses, and the summary of impacts and
alternatives contained in the Classification section of the preamble of
this final rule. Copies of the small entity compliance guide are
available from Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Northeast Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298. A copy of the EA/RIR/FRFA is accessible via the Internet at
https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/com.html.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection of information requirements contained in this final rule
may be submitted in writing to NMFS (see ADDRESSES), or to David
Rostker, OMB, by e-mail at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax at
(202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas W. Christel, Fishery Policy
Analyst, (978) 281-9141, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Amendment 13, implemented on April 27, 2004 (69 FR 22906), brought
the FMP into conformance with Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) requirements, including measures
to end overfishing and rebuild all overfished groundfish stocks. In
addition, Amendment 13 established a biennial FMP adjustment process
that requires the Council to review the fishery periodically using the
most current scientific information available, recommend target total
allowable catches (Target TACs), and recommend to the Regional
Administrator any changes to management measures necessary to achieve
the goals and objectives of the FMP.
A proposed rule was published on July 26, 2006 (71 FR 42522), that
included a detailed description of the biennial adjustment process, the
August 2005 regional peer-review of stock assessment updates (GARM II;
Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 05-13) completed
for the 19 stocks managed under the FMP, proposed management measures,
and timing issues related to the Joint Frameworks. Below is a brief
summary of information published in the proposed rule.
The Council's Plan Development Team (PDT) performed an evaluation
of the fishery based upon the results of GARM II and other available
information. The primary goal of the PDT review was to determine the
stocks for which an adjustment in management measures is required in
order to ensure that the current F levels are consistent with the F's
required under the rebuilding plans for overfished stocks managed under
the FMP. Based on the information from GARM II and catch data, the PDT
estimated F's for those stocks in need of reductions for calendar year
(CY) 2005 (F2005), a time period during which the fishery
operated under only one suite of regulations (Amendment 13).
Specifically, the PDT utilized available information for a portion of
CY 2005, projected landings for the remainder of the year (based on
current and historic information), and then estimated the F for the
entire CY (F2005).
To determine which of the 19 groundfish stocks were being fished at
F's that were not in compliance with the Amendment 13 rebuilding target
F's, the PDT compared the required F for 2006 to estimated
F2005 for each stock. The PDT determined that, with one
exception (GB yellowtail flounder), if F2005 exceeded the
Amendment 13 target F for 2006, adjustment of management measures was
necessary. These comparisons indicated that F2005 for some
groundfish stocks was less than that estimated for 2004
(F2004), but still higher than the 2006 target F
(F2006) specified in the rebuilding program established
under Amendment 13. The groundfish stocks in need of additional F
reductions to achieve the Amendment 13 F targets for fishing year (FY)
2006 are: Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod; Cape Cod (CC)/GOM yellowtail
flounder; Southern New England (SNE)/Mid-Atlantic (MA) yellowtail
flounder; SNE/MA winter flounder; GB winter flounder; and white hake
(see Table 1 below).
Table 1.--F Reductions Necessary to Achieve FY 2006 Amendment 13 F Targets
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Amendment 13 F reduction
Stock F2004 F2005 F2006 necessary (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOM Cod................................................ 0.58 0.37 0.23 32
[[Page 62157]]
CC/GOM Yellowtail Flounder............................. 0.75 0.48 0.26 46
SNE/MA Yellowtail Flounder............................. 0.99 0.58 0.26 55
SNE/MA Winter Flounder................................. 0.38 0.35 0.32 9
GB Winter Flounder..................................... 1.86 NA 1.0* 46
White Hake............................................. 1.18 NA 1.03 13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Amendment 13 did not establish a 2006 F target for GB winter flounder. Rather, Amendment 13 established the
value of Fmsy as 0.32. However, because model estimates of relative F rate are more precise than estimates of
actual F rates, GARM II presented the estimate of F rate for 2004 in relative terms. The threshold value for
the relative F rate (F2004/Fmsy) for GB winter flounder is 1.0.
NA: An estimate of F2005 for the stocks of GB winter flounder and white hake could not be developed because the
assessments are index based. The necessary F reductions are based upon F2004.
In addition to responding to the most recent information regarding
F, the proposed measures were intended to continue and modify the
management regime implemented by Amendment 13 and subsequent framework
adjustments (FW 40-A, FW 40-B, and FW 41), and to replace measures
implemented under Secretarial emergency authority at the beginning of
FY 2006 (May 1, 2006, through April 30, 2007). The Council originally
developed FW 42 with the intention of implementing the management
measures on May 1, 2006 (the start of FY 2006), as specified by
Amendment 13, and as required by the regulations. However, due to a
delay in completion of FW 42 and the need to reduce F on specific
groundfish stocks by the start of FY 2006, NMFS implemented emergency
management measures (71 FR 19348; April 13, 2006) that went into effect
on May 1, 2006, until such time that approved FW 42 measures could be
implemented. This rule supercedes the emergency rule, and the
regulatory text in this final rule is written to amend the regulations
in 50 CFR part 648 as they appeared prior to implementation of the
emergency rule.
Disapproved FW 42 Measure
FW 42 proposed that the Regional Administrator be given authority
to adjust trip limits upward to facilitate harvest of the Target TACs,
if it were projected that less than 90 percent of the Target TAC would
be caught during the FY. Trip limit changes would have been allowed at
any time during the FY, or before the start of the FY, if information
was sufficient to make the necessary projections. This measure was
disapproved, as explained below, because it is inconsistent with
National Standard 2 and section 303(a)(8) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
This proposed measure would have expanded the Regional
Administrator's authority to increase trip limits for six stocks (the
regulations already provide authority for the Regional Administrator to
modify the haddock trip limit): GOM cod, GB cod, white hake, GB winter
flounder, CC/GOM yellowtail flounder, and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder.
Administratively, this measure is problematic in that data on the catch
amount and location of affected stocks are not available on a real-time
basis and, depending upon the size of the TAC and the rate of harvest,
there would likely not be enough information to make an accurate
projection. To monitor these stocks, NMFS would need to rely on Vessel
Trip Report (VTR) data and dealer landings data to make projections
and, although such data provide some useful information, sufficient
information on both catch amount and catch location would not be
available on a real-time basis. Furthermore, the composition of Target
TACs for three of the affected stocks (GOM cod, CC/GOM yellowtail
flounder, and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder) also include discard data
and/or recreational data, which also would not be available on a real-
time basis. Because of the lack of sufficient real-time data for a
number of stocks to accurately monitor catch of particular species
within the fishery, the data available to implement this measure would
not constitute the best available scientific information, as required
by National Standard 2. In addition, section 303(a)(8) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act requires that an FMP specify the nature and extent of
scientific data needed for the effective implementation of the FMP.
Because of the limitations of existing data sources, without additional
real-time reporting requirements to provide reliable and timely catch
and discard data from both the commercial and recreational sectors,
NMFS does not have sufficient real-time data to implement this
provision. Therefore, this measure is not consistent with National
Standard 2 or the required provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
NMFS has disapproved it.
Approved Joint Framework Measures
NMFS has approved the remainder of the measures proposed in the
Joint Frameworks. A description of these approved measures follows.
1. Recreational Restrictions
Under this final rule, private recreational vessels and vessels
fishing under the charter/party regulations of the NE Multispecies FMP
are prohibited from possessing or retaining any cod from the GOM
Regulated Mesh Area (RMA) from November 1-March 31. Also, the minimum
size of cod for private recreational vessels and charter/party vessels
fishing in the GOM is increased from 22 inches (56 cm) to 24 inches (61
cm). Private recreational and charter/party vessels may transit the GOM
RMA with cod caught from outside this area, provided all bait and hooks
are removed from fishing rods and all cod are stored in coolers or ice
chests. These measures are designed to achieve a reduction in F for GOM
cod caught by the recreational sector that is similar to the F
reduction required of the commercial sector. The gear and cod stowage
requirements are necessary to enforce these measures.
2. GB Yellowtail Flounder Rebuilding Plan
This final rule approves the FW 42 rebuilding plan for GB
yellowtail flounder, whereby GB yellowtail flounder will be rebuilt
from its current stock size to the biomass that can produce maximum
sustainable yield (MSY) (Bmsy) using an adaptive strategy
that rebuilds the stock by 2014 with approximately a 75-percent
probability of success. Under the adaptive strategy, the maximum F on
the stock through 2008 will be set at Fmsy (0.25), and
subsequent changes to F required to complete rebuilding by 2014
(Frebuild) will be developed in the 2009 biennial adjustment
required by the FMP. This rebuilding strategy and 2014 timeline was
selected by the Council to be
[[Page 62158]]
consistent with the rebuilding timelines for most of the stocks in the
FMP, and to take into account uncertainty regarding the assessment of
the stock. This rebuilding strategy is consistent with the management
strategy agreed to under the U.S. cooperative management agreement with
Canada.
3. Target TACs
Target TACs are approved through this rule pursuant to Sec.
648.90(a)(2), which requires the Council to develop new Target TACs,
based upon the most recent scientific information, as part of the
biennial adjustment process. Thus, this final rule approves the Target
TACs for all groundfish stocks for FY 2006, 2007, and 2008. The
following Target TACs in Table 2 were developed by the Council's PDT
and were calculated from projections of future catches, using recent
assessment data and the Amendment 13 target F's. It is important to
note that during the public comment period for this action, it was
determined that an incorrect F rate was used in the calculation of
Target TACs for American plaice for FY 2006-2008. This error resulted
in over-estimating the Target TAC that would achieve the rebuilding F
targets for these years, but does not require a change in management
measures needed to achieve the rebuilding objectives of this action.
The Target TACs for American plaice in Table 2 reflect the corrected
Target TACs.
Table 2.--Approved Target TACs for 2006 through 2008
[Mt, live weight]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Stock 2006 2007 2008 Composition
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cod............................... GB................... 7,458 9,822 11,855 E*
GOM.................. 5,146 10,020 10,491 C*
Haddock........................... GB................... 49,829 103,329 121,681 E
GOM.................. 1,279 1,254 1,229 A
Yellowtail flounder............... GB................... 2,070 see footnote D*
SNE/MA............... 146 213 312 B*
CC/GOM............... 650 1,078 1,406 B*
American plaice................... ..................... 2,781 3,243 4,135 B*
Witch flounder.................... ..................... 5,511 5,075 4,331 A*
Winter flounder................... GB................... 1,424 1,604 1,782 A*
GOM.................. ......... see footnote C
SNE/MA............... 2,481 3,016 3,577 C*
Redfish........................... ..................... 1,946 2,075 2,167 A
White hake........................ ..................... 2,056 1,676 1,367 E*
Pollock........................... ..................... 12,005 12,005 12,005 E
Windowpane flounder............... North................ 389 389 389 A
South................ 173 166 159 A
Ocean pout........................ ..................... 38 38 38 A
Atlantic halibut.................. ..................... NA NA NA NA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A = Commercial Landings.
B = Commercial Landings and Discards.
C = Commercial Landings, Discards, and Recreational Harvest.
D = Commercial Landings and Discards (U.S. portion of U.S./Canada TAC).
E = Commercial Landings (U.S. and Canada).
*For Stocks of Concern: Incidental TAC is a subset of Target TAC.
GARM II did not develop a TAC for GOM winter flounder because of uncertainties in the assessment.
Note, proposed TACs for GB cod and GB haddock include Canadian landings.
GB yellowtail flounder TACs are hard TACs, which are determined annually and cannot be specified in advance.
2006 GB yellowtail flounder TAC was implemented on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25095).
4. Incidental Catch TACs
The values of Incidental Catch TACs for FY 2006 through 2008 are
implemented through this final rule pursuant to the regulations at
Sec. 648.85(b)(5), which require the Council to develop new Incidental
Catch TACs based upon the most recent scientific information, as part
of the biennial FMP adjustment process. Although Incidental Catch TACs
for 2006 were specified in FW 41, this action modifies definitions of
the Incidental Catch TACs with respect to the Target TACs, modifies the
allocation of Incidental Catch TACs among Special Management Programs,
and specifies values of all Incidental Catch TACs, based upon the most
recent scientific information (GARM II). As noted above, an error was
discovered in the calculation of Target TACs for American plaice that
resulted in over-estimating the Target TACs, and, therefore, the
Incidental Catch TACs for this species. The corrected Incidental Catch
TACs for American plaice are listed in Table 3 below.
In addition to the actions described above that relate to the
Incidental Catch TACs for the eight stocks of concern noted above, this
final rule defines GB yellowtail flounder and GB winter flounder as
additional stocks of concern, defines the size of the Incidental Catch
TACs (with respect to the Target TACs) that are likely to be caught in
the Special Management Programs, specifies Incidental Catch TAC values
for FYs 2006 through 2008, and allocates the Incidental Catch TACs
among Special Management Programs.
This final rule clarifies the relationship between Target TACs and
Incidental Catch TACs; that is, Incidental Catch TACs are considered as
a subset of the pertinent Target TACs (rather than as amounts in excess
of the Target TACs). This clarification is intended to increase the
utility of Target TACs as a tool used to evaluate the effectiveness of
the management measure.
[[Page 62159]]
Table 3.--Definition of Incidental Catch TACs (Percent) and Specification of Target TACs for FY 2006 Through
2008 (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock of concern Percentage of total target TAC 2006 2007 2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod...................................... Two................................. 122.6 (\*\) (\*\)
GOM cod..................................... One................................. 49.9 99.0 103.9
GB yellowtail flounder...................... Two................................. 41.4 (\*\) (\*\)
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder.................. One................................. 6.5 10.8 14.1
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder.................. One................................. 1.5 2.1 3.1
American plaice............................. Five................................ 139 162.1 206.7
Witch flounder.............................. Five................................ 275.6 253.8 216.6
SNE/MA winter flounder...................... One................................. 24.8 30.2 35.6
GB winter flounder.......................... Two................................. 28.5 32.1 35.6
White hake.................................. Two................................. 41.1 33.5 27.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Note: GB cod and GB yellowtail flounder TACs are determined annually and cannot be estimated in advance.
Table 4.--Allocation of Incidental Catch TACs Among Category B Days-at-Sea (DAS) Programs
[Shown as a percentage of the Incidental Catch TAC]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed area I Eastern U.S./
Stock of concern Regular B DAS hook gear Canada haddock
program haddock SAP SAP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOM cod................................................... 100 NA NA
GB cod.................................................... 50 16 34
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder................................ 100 NA NA
American plaice........................................... 100 NA NA
White hake................................................ 100 NA NA
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder................................ 100 NA NA
SNE/MA winter flounder.................................... 100 NA NA
Witch flounder............................................ 100 NA NA
GB yellowtail flounder.................................... 50 NA 50
GB winter flounder........................................ 50 NA 50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Default DAS Allocations
Amendment 13 established two ``default'' measures that would
automatically reduce F on multiple groundfish species, for American
plaice and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, beginning in FY 2006, unless
certain criteria are met. Because these criteria have not been met, the
Amendment 13 default DAS measure (a change in the Category A and B DAS
ratio from 60:40 to 55:45) for FY 2006-2008 remains unchanged. This
default measure represents an 8.3-percent reduction in the number of
allocated Category A DAS. This final rule also modifies the default
differential DAS counting measure in the SNE RMA, as described in
Section 8 of this preamble.
6. Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Requirement
All limited access NE multispecies DAS vessels using a groundfish
DAS must be equipped with an approved VMS that meets the requirements
of Sec. 648.9. As of the effective date of this rule, it is illegal
for a limited access NE multispecies DAS vessel to begin a fishing trip
under a groundfish DAS without an approved VMS. A vessel owner with a
limited access NE multispecies DAS permit who does not intend to and
does not fish any groundfish DAS during the FY is allowed to renew the
vessel's limited access permit without having an approved VMS, but may
not fish any of the vessel's groundfish DAS for that FY. A vessel owner
that is not already equipped with an approved VMS must provide
pertinent information (e.g., type of VMS unit, installation date,
dealer, etc.) to NMFS prior to beginning a NE multispecies fishing trip
after the effective date of this final rule. NMFS is sending letters to
all limited access NE multispecies DAS permit holders in order to
provide detailed information on the procedures pertaining to VMS
purchase, installation, and use. If a vessel is subject to multiple,
conflicting VMS regulations of different programs, the most restrictive
requirement applies. For example, a vessel fishing in both the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area and in one of the Differential DAS Areas (described in
Sections 7 and 8 of this preamble) on the same trip is subject to the
VMS restrictions that pertain to both programs (e.g., the requirement
to declare into the Differential DAS Areas prior to leaving port or
prior to leaving the Eastern U.S./Canada Area and the reporting
requirements for the Eastern U.S./Canada Area specified at Sec.
648.85(a)(3)(v)).
Despite a mandatory VMS requirement, NE multispecies DAS vessels
are still required to declare periods out of the fishery (spawning
block out and Day Gillnet vessel blocks out) through the Interactive
Voice Response (IVR) call-in system. The Regional Administrator may
authorize limited access NE multispecies vessels to utilize the IVR
system in lieu of the VMS system for the administration of DAS
requirements should a vessel's VMS become inoperable. In addition, if a
vessel's VMS is not operational, the Regional Administrator may require
vessels to obtain a Letter of Authorization (LOA) as an alternate
method of enforcing a possession limit.
7. Differential DAS Counting in GOM
Under this final rule, all NE multispecies Category A DAS used by a
vessel that has declared (through VMS, or other means approved by the
Regional Administrator), prior to leaving the dock, that it will be
fishing within the GOM Differential DAS Area during any portion of its
trip, with the exception noted below for a Day gillnet vessel, will be
charged at a rate of 2:1, regardless of area fished. The GOM
[[Page 62160]]
Differential DAS Area (defined at Sec. 648.82(e)(2)(i)(A) of the
regulatory text portion of this document), includes most of the area
west of 69[deg]30' W. long. and between 41[deg]30' and 43[deg]30' N.
lat. (between approximately Monomoy Island, MA, and Portland, ME). Day
gillnet vessels will be charged DAS at a rate of 2:1 for the actual
hours used for any trip of less than 3 hr in duration, and for any trip
of greater than 7.5 hr. For Day gillnet trips between 3 and 7.5 hr
duration, vessels will be charged a full 15 hr. To illustrate how DAS
are charged in the GOM Differential DAS Area for different categories
of vessels, the following examples are provided. A trawl vessel that
has declared into the GOM Differential DAS Area on a trip that lasts 10
actual hr would be charged 20 hr (10 hr x 2) of DAS use, regardless of
where the vessel fished. Conversely, a Day gillnet vessel that has
declared into the GOM Differential DAS Area on a trip that lasts 5
actual hr would be charged for 15 hr of DAS use regardless of where the
vessel fished (between 3 and 7.5 hr = 15 hr); a Day gillnet vessel
fishing in the GOM Differential DAS Area on a trip that lasts 8 actual
hr would be charged for 16 hr of DAS use regardless of where the vessel
fished (8 hr x 2). On any trip in which a vessel declares, prior to
leaving the dock, that it will be fishing in the GOM Differential DAS
Area under a Category A DAS, the vessel will be charged at the
differential DAS rate for the entire fishing trip, even if only a
portion of the trip is spent fishing in the GOM Differential DAS Area.
A vessel may not fish under a Category A DAS in the GOM Differential
DAS Area, unless it has declared into this area prior to the start of
the trip, or unless exempted, as described below. A vessel that does
not declare its intent to fish in the GOM Differential DAS Area may
still transit or be in the area, provided its fishing gear is properly
stowed according to the regulations and, if the vessel is in the area
for reasons other than transiting (e.g., to evade bad weather), the
vessel immediately notifies NMFS that it is within the GOM Differential
DAS Area, but not fishing through its VMS. This provision has been
modified from the proposed rule, which allowed non-fishing and non-
transiting vessels to be in the area ``due to bad weather, or other
circumstances beyond its control,'' based on Council comment and to
ensure effective enforcement of this provision.
No changes to the Monkfish FMP regulations are implemented to
accommodate the NE multispecies Differential DAS rules, but the
following is an explanation of how the proposed groundfish regulations
would work with the current Monkfish FMP regulations. A vessel issued a
limited access monkfish Category C or D permit that has declared into
the GOM Differential DAS Area under a monkfish DAS (thereby using both
a monkfish and NE multispecies DAS) will have its NE multispecies DAS
charged at a rate of 2:1, but its monkfish DAS will continue to be
charged at a rate of 1:1. The regulations will continue to allow a
monkfish Category C and D vessel to fish under a monkfish-only DAS,
when groundfish DAS are no longer available, to ensure that it can fish
its full allocation of monkfish DAS. Monkfish Category C and D vessels
that accrued monkfish-only DAS under the recent emergency regulations
as a result of the use of NE multispecies DAS at the differential rate
of 1.4 to 1 will be able to continue to use such monkfish only DAS
under this final rule, during the remainder of this FY. Under this
final rule, vessels fishing under a monkfish-only DAS will continue to
be required to fish under the provisions of the monkfish Category A or
B permit. Such a vessel is limited to monkfish-only DAS equal to its
net monkfish DAS allocations (including carry-over DAS) minus its net
NE multispecies Category A DAS allocation (including carry-over DAS). A
monkfish vessel will continue to be allocated ``monkfish only'' DAS
based upon its current allocations of monkfish and NE multispecies DAS.
This allocation is not expanded to account for the effects on monkfish
DAS due to the differential DAS measures implemented by this final
rule. For example, if a Category C monkfish vessel allocated 40
monkfish DAS has a current NE multispecies DAS allocation of 15 DAS,
the maximum number of monkfish-only DAS that the vessel would be able
to fish would be 25 DAS (40 monkfish DAS - 15 NE multispecies DAS).
However, for a vessel fishing under differential DAS, the overall
amount of monkfish DAS that could be used is effectively reduced
because the NE multispecies DAS are used at the differential rate.
Using the example above, if the vessel fished all 15 NE multispecies
DAS at the differential DAS rate, the vessel would use up its
allocation of NE multispecies DAS after 7.5 days of actual time fished
(7.5 days x 2.0 = 15 DAS). Therefore, even though the vessel only
fished 7.5 actual NE multispecies DAS, it would be able to fish only up
to 25 of its monkfish DAS as ``monkfish-only'' DAS.
For a vessel that has declared into the GOM Differential DAS Area,
trip limits apply based on the actual days spent fishing, and not on
the basis of the differential DAS that were charged for the trip. The
cod possession limit rule that requires vessels to ``run the clock'' to
fully account for each daily limit of cod caught does not apply to
trips charged at the differential DAS rate (for both GOM and GB cod).
For example, if the trip of a vessel declared into the GOM Differential
DAS Area lasts for 25 hr actual time, the vessel would be allowed to
catch twice the daily limit of GOM cod (800 lb (362.9 kg) per DAS), and
would be charged 50 hr of DAS. Because differential DAS apply only to
Category A DAS, a vessel that begins and ends its trip in the GOM
Differential DAS Area under the Regular B DAS Program is not subject to
the differential DAS counting and is subject to the DAS counting rules
of the Regular B DAS Program.
A vessel that fishes inside and outside of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area on the same trip (as described in section 15 of this preamble) may
also fish in the GOM Differential DAS Area on the same trip, provided
the vessel declares its intent to fish in the GOM Differential DAS Area
via VMS prior to leaving the Eastern U.S./Canada Area. A vessel that
has declared into both the GOM Differential DAS Area and the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area on the same trip will be subject to the most
restrictive DAS counting, trip limits, and reporting requirements
applicable to the two areas for the entire trip.
The GOM Differential DAS restrictions are designed to reduce F on
GOM/CC yellowtail flounder, GOM cod, and white hake.
8. Differential DAS Counting in SNE
All NE multispecies Category A DAS used by a vessel that has
declared (through VMS, or other means approved by the Regional
Administrator), prior to leaving the dock, that it will be fishing
within the SNE Differential DAS Area during any portion of its trip,
with the exception noted below, will be charged at a rate of 2:1 when
fishing in a specific portion of the SNE RMA. A vessel may not fish,
except as noted below, under a Category A DAS in the SNE Differential
DAS Area, unless it has declared into the area prior to the start of
the trip. The SNE Differential DAS Area (defined at Sec.
648.82(e)(2)(i)(B) in the regulatory text portion of this document) is
an irregular-shaped offshore area extending from 73[deg]40' W. long.,
east to 69[deg]30' W. long. (from south of western Long Island to north
of the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area). On
[[Page 62161]]
any trip in which a vessel declares, prior to leaving the dock, via its
VMS unit, that it will be harvesting fish in the SNE Differential DAS
Area under a Category A DAS, the vessel will be charged at the
differential DAS rate for that portion of the trip spent in the SNE
Differential Area (as determined from VMS positional data). The time
spent outside this area will be charged at the rate of 1:1. For
example, if a trawl vessel declares into the SNE Differential DAS Area
through its VMS unit on a trip that lasts 12 actual hr with only 4 hr
actually spent in the SNE Differential DAS Area, the total DAS deducted
for that trip would equal 16 hr (8 hr of actual time outside the SNE
Differential DAS Area plus 8 hr (4 hr x 2) of differential DAS time). A
Day gillnet vessel that declares into the SNE Differential DAS Area
through VMS will be charged according to the following formula for the
actual time spent in the SNE Differential DAS Area: For hours accrued
in the area less than 3 hr or greater than 7.5 hr, vessels will be
charged at a rate of 2:1; for hours accrued in the area between 3 and
7.5 hr, vessels will be charged a full 15 hr. The DAS accrued outside
of the SNE Differential DAS Area will accrue on a 1:1 basis. For
example, if a Day gillnet vessel declared into the SNE Differential DAS
Area on a trip that lasts 12 actual hours with only 5 hr actually spent
in the SNE Differential DAS Area, the total DAS deducted for that trip
would be 22 hr (7 hr of actual time outside of the SNE Differential DAS
Area, plus 15 hr according to the above formula). For trips where a Day
gillnet vessel declares into the SNE Differential DAS Area, the
application of the DAS accrual formula described above does not
supersede the DAS accrual formula that applies to all NE multispecies
Day gillnet vessels. In other words, the net DAS charge for a Day
gillnet vessel for a trip declared into the SNE Differential DAS Area
may not be less than the DAS that would accrue on the same length trip
by a Day gillnet vessel not declared into the SNE Differential DAS
Area.
If the Regional Administrator requires the use of the IVR or other
non-VMS reporting system, a vessel fishing for any portion of its trip
in the SNE Differential DAS Area will be charged at the rate of 2:1 for
the entire trip, in a manner similar to that described for differential
DAS counting in the GOM Differential DAS Area (see section 7 of this
preamble). Because it is not possible to determine the amount of time a
vessel fishes inside the SNE Differential DAS Area using IVR or IVR
technology, the vessel must be charged at the differential rate for the
entire trip. Further, if a vessel fishes in both the GOM and SNE
Differential DAS Area on the same trip, the vessel will be charged at
the rate of 2:1 for the entire trip.
Similar to fishing in the GOM Differential DAS Area, a vessel
issued a limited access monkfish Category C or D permit that has
declared into the SNE Differential DAS Area under a monkfish DAS (and
therefore is accruing both monkfish and NE multispecies DAS) will have
its NE multispecies DAS charged at a rate of 2:1, as described above,
and its monkfish DAS charged at a rate of 1:1.
A vessel that does not declare its intent to fish in the SNE
Differential DAS Area under a Category A DAS, may still transit or be
in the area, provided its fishing gear is properly stowed, according to
the applicable regulations, and if the vessel is not in the area for
transiting purposes, it immediately notifies NMFS through its VMS that
it is in the SNE Differential DAS Area, but not fishing. This provision
has been modified from the proposed rule, which allowed non-fishing and
non-transiting vessels to be in the area ``due to bad weather, or other
circumstances beyond its control,'' based on Council comment and to
ensure effective enforcement of this measure.
Similar to how trip limits are counted when fishing in the GOM
Differential DAS Area, for trips declared into the SNE Differential DAS
Area, all trip limits apply based on the actual days spent fishing, and
not on the basis of the number of DAS charged. A vessel that begins and
ends a fishing trip under the Regular B DAS Program is not be subject
to differential DAS counting, regardless of where it fishes.
A vessel that fishes inside and outside of the U.S./Canada
Management Area on the same trip (as described in section 15 of this
preamble) may also fish in the SNE Differential DAS Area on the same
trip, provided the vessel declares its intent to fish in the SNE
Differential DAS Area via VMS prior to leaving the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area. A vessel that has declared into both the SNE Differential DAS
Area and the Eastern U.S./Canada Area on the same trip will be subject
to the more restrictive DAS counting, trip limits, and reporting
requirements applicable to the two areas for the entire trip.
The SNE Differential DAS restrictions are designed to reduce F on
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, SNE winter flounder, and white hake.
9. Commercial Trip Limits
This final rule does not change the Amendment 13 GOM cod trip limit
(800 lb (362.9 kg) per DAS, up to 4,000 lb (1,818.2 kg) per trip). This
final rule implements new trip limits for white hake and GB winter
flounder, modifies the existing trip limits for the three yellowtail
flounder stocks (CC/GOM, GB, and SNE/MA), and modifies the haddock trip
limit and the GOM cod trip limit exemption and cod overage regulations.
A NE multispecies DAS vessel fishing under Category A DAS, or any
other vessel subject to the NE multispecies possession and trip limit
regulations, may land up 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of white hake per DAS, or
any part of a DAS, up to 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) per trip, unless
otherwise restricted. A NE multispecies DAS vessel fishing under a
Category A DAS that has declared into the U.S./Canada Management Area,
or any other vessel subject to the NE multispecies possession and trip
limit regulations, may land up to 5,000 lb (2,268.1 kg) of GB winter
flounder and 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) of GB yellowtail flounder per trip,
unless otherwise restricted. The U.S./Canada Management Area is defined
as the same geographic area as the GB winter flounder and the GB
yellowtail flounder stock areas.
NE multispecies DAS vessels fishing under Category A DAS, or any
other vessel subject to the NE multispecies possession and trip limit
regulations, may land up to 250 lb (113.6 kg) per DAS, or any part of a
DAS, up to 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) per trip of CC/GOM or SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder for the entire FY. Because the trip limits for CC/GOM and SNE/
MA yellowtail flounder are the same, this final rule removes the
requirement that vessels obtain and possess on board a yellowtail
flounder LOA issued by the Regional Administrator in order to land
yellowtail flounder from the CC/GOM or SNE/MA Yellowtail Flounder
Areas.
This final rule expands the Regional Administrator's authority to
modify the GB yellowtail flounder trip limit, removes the requirement
that NMFS impose a GB yellowtail flounder trip limit when 70 percent of
the TAC is reached, and removes the threshold harvest levels of 30
percent and 60 percent before other management measures can be
adjusted. Instead, this final rule implements an initial GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit of 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg) per trip and allows the
Regional Administrator to make adjustments to the GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit at any time during the FY, and to eliminate or
adjust the initial 10,000-lb (4,536.2-kg) trip limit before the start
of the FY, in order to prevent exceeding or in order to facilitate
harvesting the GB yellowtail flounder TAC, in a manner consistent
[[Page 62162]]
with the Administrative Procedure Act, as more fully described under
Section 22 of this preamble. If no trip limit is specified for the
beginning of a FY, the 10,000-lb (4,536.2-kg) yellowtail flounder trip
limit will remain in effect. The Regional Administrator may specify a
yellowtail flounder trip limit for all of the U.S./Canada Management
Area or for either of its two sub-areas (i.e., the Western U.S./Canada
Area or the Eastern U.S./Canada Area). This final rule also recognizes
non-binding guidance developed by the Council to assist the Regional
Administrator regarding potential in-season modifications to the GB
yellowtail flounder trip limit. Table 5 contains catch thresholds and
associated trip limits offered as non-binding Council guidance for
consideration.
Table 5.--GB Yellowtail Flounder Trip Limit Adjustment Guidance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If catch is projected to
reach 30% of the TAC If catch is projected to reach 60% of the TAC
FY quarter during the specified during the specified quarter, the suggested
quarter, the suggested trip limit is as follows:
trip limit is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarter 1 (May-July)............... 7,500 lb (3,402.1 kg)..... 3,000 lb (1,360.9 kg).
Quarter 2 (August-October)......... 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg).... 5,000 lb (2,268.1 kg).
Quarter 3 (November-January)....... 25,000 lb (11,340.4 kg)... 10,000 lb (4,536.2 kg).
Quarter 4 (February-April)......... Remove trip limits........ 25,000 lb (11,340.4 kg).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule eliminates the current initial haddock trip limit
provision (May-Sept 3,000 lb (1,360.8 kg) per DAS up to 30,000 lb
(13,608 kg) per trip; Oct-Apr 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) per DAS up to 50,000
lb (22,680 kg) per trip) and as more fully described under Section 22
of this preamble, the automatic trip limit reduction for Eastern GB
haddock (1,500 lb (680.4 kg) per DAS or up to 15,000 lb (6,804.1 kg)
per trip) when 70 percent of the TAC is projected by the Regional
Administrator.
The requirement for NE multispecies DAS vessels to obtain a GB Cod
Trip Limit Exemption LOA from the Regional Administrator when fishing
outside of the GOM RMA, if the vessel operator desires to be exempt
from the more restrictive cod trip limit in the GOM, is eliminated
because this law enforcement tool is no longer necessary. Instead, with
the exception of vessels declared into the U.S./Canada Management Area,
a NE multispecies DAS vessel fishing south of the GOM RMA must declare
through the VMS, prior to leaving the dock in accordance with
instructions to be provided by the Regional Administrator, its intent
to fish south of the GOM RMA in order to be subject to the less
restrictive GB cod trip limits. Such a vessel is exempt from the GOM
cod landing limit, but may not fish in the GOM RMA for the duration of
the trip. Such a vessel may transit the GOM RMA, provided that its gear
is properly stowed while in the GOM RMA. A vessel that has not declared
through VMS that it will be fishing south of the GOM RMA, is subject to
the most restrictive applicable cod trip limit, regardless of area
fished for the entire trip.
The Regional Administrator retains the authority to require a
vessel to obtain a GOM Cod Trip Limit Exemption LOA (as under pre-FW 42
regulations), if NMFS's administration of the VMS program is not
operational. If an LOA is required, such a vessel may not fish north of
the exemption area for a minimum of 7 consecutive days (when fishing
under the NE multispecies DAS program), and must carry the LOA on
board.
For a vessel that is not declared into and does not fish in either
of the two differential DAS areas and that catches cod in excess of the
GOM or GB cod trip limits (i.e., the vessel possesses up to 1 extra
day's worth of cod in relation to the amount of DAS that have elapsed),
the current requirement for vessels to ``run'' their clocks upon
entering port (to account for the amount of cod on board) is replaced
by a requirement to make a declaration via VMS prior to crossing the
VMS demarcation line. For a vessel making this VMS declaration, NMFS
will make the appropriate increase to the DAS accrued (up to 23 hours
and 59 minutes) to round up the next 24-hr increment of DAS.
10. Regular B DAS Program
This final rule renews the Regular B DAS Program, but modifies
certain aspects in order to further reduce the potential risks
associated with the use of a Regular B DAS and to minimize impacts to
the monkfish fishery. The program will no longer be characterized as a
``Pilot,'' and will remain in effect indefinitely.
The Regular B DAS Program allows limited access NE multispecies DAS
vessels with an allocation of Regular B DAS to fish under a Regular B
DAS in order to harvest relatively healthy groundfish stocks (GB
haddock, pollock, redfish, GOM winter flounder, and GOM haddock). GB
winter flounder and GB yellowtail flounder are now considered ``stocks
of concern'' that require additional reductions in F. Vessels eligible
to fish in the Regular B DAS Program may not fish in this program and
in a Special Access Program (SAP) (e.g., the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP, Closed Area (CA) I Hook Gear Haddock SAP, or CA II
yellowtail flounder SAP) on the same trip. In order to limit the
potential biological impacts of the program, only 500 Regular B DAS may
be used during the first quarter of the CY (May through July), while
1,000 Regular B DAS may be used in subsequent quarters (August through
October, November through January, and February through April). DAS
that are not used in one quarter will not be available for use in
subsequent quarters. As implemented previously under FW 40-A, Regular B
DAS will accrue at the rate of 1 DAS for each calendar day, or part of
a calendar day, fished.
A vessel participating in this program must be equipped with an
approved VMS and must notify the NMFS Observer Program at least 72 hr
in advance of a trip in order to facilitate observer coverage. This
notification requires reporting of the following information: The
general area or areas that will be fished (GOM, GB, or SNE), vessel
name, contact name for coordination of observer deployment, telephone
number of contact, date, time, and port of departure. Providing notice
of the area that the vessel intends to fish does not restrict the
vessel's activity to fish only in that area on that trip, but will be
used to plan observer coverage. Prior to departing on the trip, the
vessel owner or operator must notify NMFS via VMS that the vessel
intends to participate in the Regular B DAS Program. Vessels fishing in
the Regular B DAS Program must report their catches of certain
groundfish stocks of concern (cod, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder,
[[Page 62163]]
American plaice, and white hake) and haddock daily through VMS,
including the amount of fish kept and discarded. These reporting
requirements are consistent with the standardized reporting
requirements that, as implemented by this final rule, apply to all
Special Management Programs of the FMP, as explained in section 17 of
this preamble.
In contrast to the Regular B DAS Pilot Program, in which a trawl
vessel was not required to utilize any particular gear type, under this
final rule, a trawl vessel must use an approved haddock separator trawl
when participating in the Regular B DAS Program. Other trawl net
configurations may be on board the vessel, provided they are properly
stowed when the vessel is fishing under the Regular B DAS Program
rules. The intent of this restriction is to further reduce the
potential for vessels to catch stocks of concern, notably cod,
yellowtail flounder, and winter flounder. Furthermore, for a trawl
vessel fishing with the proposed haddock separator trawl, possession of
flounders (all species, combined); monkfish (whole weight), unless
otherwise specified below; and skates is limited to 500 lb (227 kg)
each, and possession of lobsters is prohibited, to help promote and
ensure the proper utilization of the haddock separator trawl; a
properly configured haddock separator trawl should not catch large
quantities of these species.
A vessel fishing under a Category B DAS while in this program is
prohibited from discarding legal-sized regulated NE multispecies,
Atlantic halibut, ocean pout, and monkfish, and is limited to landing
100 lb (45.4 kg) per DAS, or any part of a DAS, of each of the
following groundfish stocks: GOM cod, GB cod, GB yellowtail flounder,
American plaice, witch flounder, white hake, SNE/MA winter flounder, GB
winter flounder, southern windowpane flounder, and ocean pout, unless
further restricted (see below). In addition, a vessel fishing in this
program is limited to landing no more than one Atlantic halibut and 25
lb (11.3 kg) per DAS, or any part of a DAS, up to a maximum of 250 lb
(113 kg) per trip, of CC/GOM or SNE/MA yellowtail flounder. A limited
access monkfish DAS vessel fishing with gear other than trawl gear that
is participating in this program under a NE multispecies DAS is subject
to the monkfish Incidental Catch limit applicable to the monkfish
Incidental Catch permit (Category E) (i.e., 400 lb (181.4 kg) tail
weight/DAS, or 50 percent of the total weight of fish on board,
whichever is less, when fishing in the monkfish Northern Fishery
Management Area (NFMA); and 50 lb (22.7 kg) tail weight/DAS when
fishing in the monkfish Southern Fishery Management Area (SFMA)). A
limited access monkfish DAS vessels fishing with trawl gear that is
participating in this program under a NE multispecies DAS is subject to
the monkfish Incidental Catch limit applicable to the monkfish
Incidental Catch permit (Category E), as well as the monkfish
restrictions associated with the required use of the haddock separator
trawl (as described below). That is, vessels may not land more than 500
lb (226.8 kg) whole weight of monkfish per trip when fishing in the
monkfish NFMA; and 500 lb (226.8 kg) whole weight per trip or 50 lb
(22.7 kg) tail weight per DAS, whichever is less, when fishing in the
monkfish SFMA.
If a vessel fishing under the Category B DAS Program harvests and
brings on board a stock with an Incidental Catch TAC (cod, yellowtail,
American plaice, witch flounder, white hake, SNE winter flounder, GB
winter flounder), or southern windowpane flounder, ocean pout, Atlantic
halibut, or monkfish, in excess of the landing limits, the vessel
operator must retain on board the excess catch of these species, and
immediately notify NMFS, via VMS, that it is changing its DAS category
from a Regular B DAS to a Category A DAS (i.e., ``DAS flip''). If a
vessel flips from a Regular B DAS to a Category A DAS, it will be
charged Category A DAS, which will accrue to the nearest minute, for
the entire trip (i.e., not to the nearest day). Once the vessel flips,
it is subject to the Category A trip limit restrictions. A vessel
fishing in the Category B DAS Program must abide by all the reporting
requirements described above for the duration of the trip, even if the
vessel ``flips'' to a Category A DAS.
In order to ensure that a vessel will always have the ability to
flip to a Category A DAS while fishing under a Regular B DAS (should it
catch a groundfish species of concern in an amount that exceeded the
trip limit), with the exception of vessels fishing in one of the
differential DAS areas (as explained below), the number of Regular B
DAS that may be used on a trip is limited to the number of Category A
DAS that the vessel has at the start of the trip. For example, if a
vessel plans a trip under the Regular B DAS Program and has 5 Category
A DAS available, the maximum number of Regular B DAS that the vessel
could fish on that trip under the Regular B DAS Program would be 5. If
a vessel is fishing in either the GOM Differential DAS Area or the SNE
Differential DAS Area, the number of Regular B DAS that may be used on
a trip is limited to the number of Category A DAS that the vessel has
at the start of the trip divided by two. For example, if a vessel plans
a trip under the Regular B DAS Program and has 10 Category A DAS
available, the maximum number of Regular B DAS that the vessel could
fish on that trip under the Regular B DAS Program would be 5.
This action provides the Regional Administrator authority to
approve the use of additional gear specifically for this program, based
on approved gear standards recommended by the Council. After
consideration of the Groundfish Committee's recommendation on the
standards that must be met by potential gears, the Council may
determine what standards, if any, will be recommended to the Regional
Administrator to facilitate the determination of whether a proposed
gear type is acceptable based on whether the proposed gear has been
demonstrated to reduce catch of groundfish stocks of concern. Upon
receipt of the Council's recommendation on gear standards, NMFS may
implement these standards in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act. If NMFS decides not to implement the
Council's recommendation on gear standards, it must provide a written
rationale to the Council regarding its decision not to do so.
The Pilot Program implemented by FW 40-A allowed a vessel issued a
limited access monkfish Category C or D permit to use a NE multispecies
Regular B DAS to fulfill the requirements of the Monkfish FMP, which
requires such a vessel to use a NE multispecies DAS every time a
monkfish DAS is used. To reduce fishing mortality on monkfish resulting
from the use of Regular B DAS, this final rule implements the Monkfish
FW 3 provision prohibiting a limited access monkfish DAS vessel that
also possesses a limited access NE multispecies DAS permit from using a
monkfish DAS (in conjunction with a NE multispecies Regular B DAS) when
participating in the Regular B DAS Program. This vessel may still
participate in this program and use a NE multispecies Regular B DAS,
but it must fish under a NE multispecies DAS only and is subject to the
monkfish trip limits. Discarding of legal-sized monkfish is prohibited
when fishing under this program.
NMFS will administer the Regular B DAS Program quarterly DAS cap by
monitoring the total number of Regular B DAS accrued on trips that
begin and end under a Regular B DAS. Mere declaration of a Regular B
DAS Program trip through VMS does not reserve a
[[Page 62164]]
vessel's right to fish under this program, because the vessel must also
cross the demarcation line to begin a trip in this program. Once the
maximum number of Regular B DAS are projected to be used in a quarter,
the Regional Administrator will end the Regular B DAS Program for that
quarter. In order to limit the potential impact of the Regular B DAS
Program on the fishing mortality of groundfish stocks of concern, a
quarterly Incidental Catch TAC will be set for certain groundfish
stocks of concern for this program. Based upon the definition of
Incidental Catch TACs and the allocation of Incidental Catch TACs among
Special Management Programs (Table 3 and 4, respectively), the proposed
Incidental Catch TACs allocated to the Regular B DAS Program are
calculated and divided into quarterly Incidental Catch TACs as shown in
Table 6. The quarterly Incidental Catch TACs are divided among quarters
in order to correspond to the allocation of DAS among quarters. The 1st
quarter (May-July) will receive 13 percent of the Incidental Catch
TACs, and the remaining quarters (August-October, November-January, and
February-April) will each receive 29 percent of the Incidental Catch
TACs.
Table 6.--Incidental Catch TACs for the Regular B DAS Program
[mt, live weight]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Qtr 1 Qtr 2-4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2-4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2-4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod........................................ 8.0 17.8 See Note
GOM cod....................................... 6.5 14.5 12.9 28.7 13.5 30.1
GB yellowtail flounder........................ 2.7 6.0 See Note
SNE/MA yellowtail............................. 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.9
CC/GOM yellowtail............................. 0.8 1.9 1.4 3.1 1.8 4.1
American plaice............................... 18.1 40.3 21.1 47.0 26.9 60.0
Witch flounder................................ 35.8 79.9 33.0 73.6 28.2 62.8
White hake.................................... 5.3 11.9 4.4 9.7 3.6 7.9
SNE/MA winter flounder........................ 3.2 7.2 3.9 8.7 4.7 10.4
GB winter flounder............................ 1.9 4.1 2.1 4.6 2.2 5.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: TACs for this stock depend on annual specification of TACs in the U.S./Canada Management Area. TACs are
calculated using the definition of Incidental Catch TACs and the allocation of Incidental Catch TACs among
Special Management Programs (Table 3 and 4, respectively), as well as the quarterly division of the TAC
described above. Separate specification of these TACs is not necessary, because they are calculated based upon
an explicit formula.
With the exception of white hake, CC/GOM yellowtail flounder, and
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, if the Incidental Catch TAC for any one of
these species is caught (landings plus discards) during a quarter, use
of Regular B DAS in the pertinent stock area will be prohibited for the
remainder of that quarter. Vessels can once again use Regular B DAS at
the beginning of the subsequent quarter. When the white hake Incidental
Catch TAC is caught, the possession of white hake when fishing under
the Regular B DAS Program will be prohibited. For the CC/GOM and SNE/MA
stocks of yellowtail flounder, when the respective Incidental Catch
TACs are caught, only a portion of the stock area where the species is
predominantly caught will be closed to Regular B DAS Program
participants. Upon attainment of the CC/GOM yellowtail flounder
incidental Catch TAC, the following 30-minute square blocks will close:
Blocks 98, 114, 123, 124, 125, 132, and 133. Upon attainment of the
SNE/MA yellowtail flounder Incidental Catch TAC, the following 30-
minute square blocks will close: Blocks 70 to 73, 82 to 88, 98, 99, and
101 to 103.
Under the Pilot Program, the Regional Administrator had the
authority to prohibit the use of Regular B DAS for the duration of a
quarter or FY, if it was projected that continuation of the Regular B
DAS Program would undermine the achievement of the objectives of the
FMP or the Regular B DAS Program. This final rule continues this
authority, but provides additional reasons for terminating the program.
Additional reasons for terminating the program include, but are not
limited to, the following: Inability to restrict catches to the
Incidental Catch TACs; evidence of excessive discarding; evidence of a
significant difference in flipping rates between observed and
unobserved trips; and insufficient observer coverage to adequately
monitor the program, particularly if coverage declines below the
Council's recommendation of 36 percent (the same level of observer
coverage as occurred during the original Pilot Program).
11. Renewal of DAS Leasing Program
This final rule continues the DAS Leasing Program, without change,
to help mitigate the economic and social impacts resulting from the
current FMP regulations that strictly limit fishing effort.
12. Renewal and Modification of the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SA