Assessment of Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 2007: Proposed, 61801-61803 [E6-17526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Notices
registration to import a basic class of
any controlled substance listed in
schedule I or II are, and will continue
to be required to demonstrate to the
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, that the requirements
for such registration pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21
CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are
satisfied.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17525 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–300P]
Assessment of Annual Needs for the
List I Chemicals Ephedrine,
Pseudoephedrine, and
Phenylpropanolamine for 2007:
Proposed
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed year 2007
assessment of annual needs.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes initial
year 2007 assessment of annual needs
for certain List I chemicals in
accordance with the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of
2005 (CMEA), enacted on March 9,
2006. The Act required DEA to establish
production quotas and import quotas for
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine. This effort was
done in order to prevent the illicit use
of these three chemicals in the
clandestine manufacture of
methamphetamine. The enactment of
the CMEA places additional regulatory
controls upon the manufacture,
distribution, importation and
exportation of the three List I chemicals.
DATES: Comments or objections must be
received on or before December 4, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–300P’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail
should be sent to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC 20537,
Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL. Written comments
sent via express mail should be sent to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL,
2401 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may
be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. DEA
will accept attachments to electronic
comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file
formats only. DEA will not accept any
file format other than those specifically
listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, by e-mail,
ode@dea.usdoj.gov or by fax, (202) 353–
1263.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
713 of the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (Title VII of Pub.
L. 109–177) (CMEA) amended section
306 of the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA) (Title 21 United States Code
(U.S.C.) § 826 ‘‘Production quotas for
controlled substances’’) by adding
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine to existing
language to read as follows: ‘‘The
Attorney General shall determine the
total quantity and establish production
quotas for each basic class of controlled
substance in schedules I and II and for
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine to be
manufactured each calendar year to
provide for the estimated medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States, for lawful export
requirements, and for the establishment
and maintenance of reserve stocks.’’
Further, § 715 of CMEA amended 21
U.S.C. § 952 ‘‘Importation of controlled
substances’’ by adding the same List I
chemicals to the existing language in
paragraph (a), and by adding a new
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
(a) Controlled substances in schedule I or
II and narcotic drugs in schedule III, IV, or
V; exceptions:
It shall be unlawful to import into the
customs territory of the United States from
any place outside thereof (but within the
United States), or to import into the United
States from any place outside thereof, any
controlled substance in schedule I or II of
subchapter I of this chapter, or any narcotic
drug in schedule III, IV, or V of subchapter
I of this chapter, or ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine, except that—
(1) such amounts of crude opium, poppy
straw, concentrate of poppy straw, and coca
leaves, and of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
and phenylpropanolamine, as the Attorney
General finds to be necessary to provide for
medical, scientific, or other legitimate
purposes, and * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61801
(d)(1) With respect to a registrant under
section 958 who is authorized under
subsection (a)(1) to import ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine,
at any time during the year the registrant may
apply for an increase in the amount of such
chemical that the registrant is authorized to
import, and the Attorney General may
approve the application if the Attorney
General determines that the approval is
necessary to provide for medical, scientific,
or other legitimate purposes regarding the
chemical.
Note: This excerpt of the amendment is
published for the convenience of the reader.
The official text is published at 21 U.S.C.
952(a) and (d)(1).
The responsibility for establishing the
assessment of annual needs has been
delegated to the Administrator of the
DEA by § 0.100 of Title 28 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. The
Administrator, in turn, has redelegated
this function to the Deputy
Administrator, pursuant to the Code of
Federal Regulations Title 28 § 0.104.
The proposed year 2007 assessment of
annual needs represents those quantities
of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine which may be
manufactured domestically and/or
imported into the United States to
provide adequate supplies of each
substance for: The estimated medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States; lawful export
requirements; and the establishment
and maintenance of reserve stocks.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical
Needs of the United States for
Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine
Since the manufacture and
importation of ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine have not been
previously regulated through the
establishment of an assessment of
annual needs, the Drug Enforcement
Administration obtained assistance from
a private independent contractor, IMS
Health Government Solutions (IMS), to
develop the proposed initial estimate of
the medical needs of the United States
of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine.
IMS’ estimates of medical needs for
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine were
derived from 2005 data that the
company routinely collects and offers to
customers in order to understand the
pharmaceutical market. For this
analysis, IMS utilized the following
types of data: (1) Sales to retail
establishments (including pharmacies),
(2) sales by retail establishments to
patients, and (3) medical insurance
claims. IMS’ estimates of medical needs
were intended to encompass only those
products containing either ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine, whether requiring a
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
61802
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
prescription or available over-thecounter (OTC). Its estimates of use
encompassed those products containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine which
are lawfully marketed under the Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Although no direct estimates for the
assessment of annual needs are
currently available, IMS utilized
information from a variety of data
sources to develop three independent
measures (as described in the next
paragraph). After each of the three
independent measures were calculated
for ephedrine and pseudoephedrine,
IMS then took a weighted average of the
three individual estimates in order to
derive its final estimate which was then
considered by DEA. The weighted
average was determined based on IMS’
confidence in each individual estimate
such that estimates with less confidence
were given less weight.
The first estimate was based upon
product sales to retail outlets, from IMS’
National Sales Perspective (NSP)
service. This estimate was
supplemented with information from:
IMS’ Drug Distribution Database (DDD)
and National Prescription Audit (NPA),
ACNielsen’s Scantrack (ST) and
Homescan (HS) services. The second
estimate was based upon product sales
to customers, from NPA, ST, and HS
services, supplemented with
information from DDD and NSP
services. The third estimate was based
upon patient prescription claims data
from IMS’ ReferencePoint (RP) database,
supplemented with information from
United States Census Bureau population
estimates and IMS’ National Disease and
Therapeutic Index (NDTI), NSP, DDD,
ST, and HS services. A copy of the IMS
report may be obtained from DEA
Diversion Web site at: https://
www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov.
Based on the IMS report, DEA
concluded that 3,800 kg of ephedrine
and 350,700 kg of pseudoephedrine
were required to meet the medical needs
of the United States.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical
Needs of the United States for
Phenylpropanolamine
DEA did not request that IMS
determine the medical needs for
phenylpropanolamine. In November
2000, the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) issued a public health warning
for phenylpropanolamine and requested
that all drug companies discontinue
marketing products containing
phenylpropanolamine due to the drug’s
association with risk for hemorrhagic
stroke. In response to the FDA’s
warning, many companies voluntarily
reformulated their products to exclude
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
phenylpropanolamine. Subsequently,
on December 22, 2005, FDA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (70 FR
75988) to reclassify all over-the-counter
nasal decongestants and weight control
drug products containing
phenylpropanolamine preparations
from their previously proposed
monograph status (Category 1) to
nonmonograph (Category II). FDA
concluded that drug products
containing phenylpropanolamine
cannot be generally recognized as safe
and should no longer be available for
over-the-counter use in humans.
Therefore, for purposes of calculating
the medical needs of the United States
for phenylpropanolamine, DEA
considered the drug’s use in veterinary
products only.
DEA obtained from the FDA a list of
all companies that manufacture
veterinary products containing
phenylpropanolamine. DEA contacted
each company and requested
information relating to sales of their
phenylpropanolamine-containing
products. Based on this review, DEA
concluded that 4,354 kg were required
to meet the medical needs of the United
States.
List I chemicals
Phenylpropanolamine ...........
2005 export
quantity
(kg)
320
In consideration of the amounts
required for the maintenance of reserve
stocks, DEA considered 20% of the
estimated medical and industrial
requirements.
Based on this information, the Deputy
Administrator hereby proposes that the
year 2007 assessment of annual needs
for the following List I chemicals,
expressed in kilograms of anhydrous
base or acid, be established as follows:
List I chemicals
Ephedrine (for sale) ....................
Ephedrine (for conversion) .........
Pseudoephedrine (for sale) ........
Phenylpropanolamine (for sale)
Phenylpropanolamine (for conversion) ...................................
Proposed
year 2007
quotas
(kg)
7,100
128,760
511,100
5,545
kg
kg
kg
kg
6,240 kg
Ephedrine (for conversion) refers to
the industrial use of ephedrine, i.e., that
which will be converted to
pseudoephedrine.
Calculation of the Assessment:
Phenylpropanolamine (for conversion)
Industrial Needs, Export and Inventory
refers to the industrial use of
Requirements
phenylpropanolamine, i.e., that which
After DEA considered the medical
will be converted to amphetamine by
needs for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine
the pharmaceutical industry. The ‘‘for
and phenylpropanolamine (veterinary
sale’’ quotas refer to the amount of
products), it then considered: (1)
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
Industrial needs of the United States, (2) phenylpropanolamine used for purposes
lawful export requirements, and (3)
outside of the above-mentioned
maintenance of reserve stocks to
conversions.
determine the assessment of annual
All interested persons are invited to
needs for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
submit their comments in writing or
and phenylpropanolamine.
electronically regarding this proposal
In consideration of the industrial
following the procedures in the
needs of the United States for these
ADDRESSES section of this document. A
three chemicals, DEA considered the
person may object to or comment on the
use of ephedrine for the domestic
proposal relating to any of the abovemanufacture of pseudoephedrine in
mentioned chemicals without filing
2005 and the amount of
comments or objections regarding the
phenylpropanolamine used for the
others. If a person believes that one or
domestic manufacture of amphetamine
more of these issues warrant a hearing,
in 2005.
the individual should so state and
In consideration of the requirements
summarize the reasons for this belief.
for lawful export purposes for these
In the event that comments or
three chemicals, DEA considered total
objections to this proposal raise one or
2005 exports as provided on the DEAmore issues which the Deputy
Form 486 entitled ‘‘Import/Export
Administrator finds warrant a hearing,
Declaration—Precursors and Essential
the Deputy Administrator shall order a
Chemicals.’’ Exports reported on the
public hearing by notice in the Federal
DEA–486 were as follows:
Register, summarizing the issues to be
heard and setting the time for the
2005 export
hearing.
List I chemicals
quantity
The Office of Management and Budget
(kg)
has determined that notices of quotas
Ephedrine .............................
2,540 are not subject to centralized review
Pseudoephedrine ..................
90,260 under Executive Order 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
This action does not preempt or
modify any provision of State law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any State; nor does it
diminish the power of any State to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
action does not have any federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
The Deputy Administrator hereby
certifies that this action will have no
significant impact upon small entities
whose interests must be considered
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq. The establishment of
quotas for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
and phenylpropanolamine is mandated
by law. The quotas are necessary to
provide for the estimated medical,
scientific, research and industrial needs
of the United States, for export
requirements and the establishment and
maintenance of reserve stocks. While
quotas are of primary importance to
large manufacturers, their impact upon
small entities is neither negative nor
beneficial. Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator has determined that this
action does not require a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
This action meets the applicable
standards set forth in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
This action will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $118,000,000 or more
in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
This action is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Congressional Review Act). This
action will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–17526 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–270F]
Controlled Substances: Final Revised
Aggregate Production Quotas for 2006
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), U.S. Department
of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of final aggregate
production quotas for 2006.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice establishes final
2006 aggregate production quotas for
controlled substances in Schedules I
and II of the Controlled Substances Act
of 1970 (CSA). The DEA has taken into
consideration comments received in
response to a notice of the proposed
revised aggregate production quotas for
2006 published July 5, 2006 (71 FR
38174).
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Telephone:
(202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
306 of the CSA (Title 21 United States
Code (U.S.C. 826) requires that the
Attorney General establish aggregate
production quotas for each basic class of
controlled substance listed in Schedules
I and II. This responsibility has been
delegated to the Administrator of the
DEA by 28 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) 0.100. The Administrator, in turn,
has redelegated this function to the
Deputy Administrator, pursuant to 28
CFR 0.104.
The 2006 aggregate production quotas
represent those quantities of controlled
substances in Schedules I and II that
may be produced in the United States in
2006 to provide adequate supplies of
each substance for: the estimated
medical, scientific, research and
industrial needs of the United States;
lawful export requirements; and the
establishment and maintenance of
reserve stocks (21 U.S.C. 826(a) and 21
CFR 1303.11). These quotas do not
include imports of controlled
substances.
On July 5, 2006, a notice of the
proposed revised 2006 aggregate
production quotas for certain controlled
substances in Schedules I and II was
published in the Federal Register (71
FR 38174). All interested persons were
invited to comment on or object to these
proposed aggregate production quotas
on or before July 26, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61803
Eight companies commented on a
total of 22 Schedules I and II controlled
substances within the published
comment period. Eight companies
proposed that the aggregate production
quotas for alfentanil, amphetamine,
codeine (for conversion),
dihydrocodeine, dihydromorphine,
diphenoxylate, fentanyl, gamma
hydroxybutyric acid, hydrocodone,
hydromorphinol, hydromorphone,
methadone, methylphenidate, morphine
(for conversion), N,Ndimethylamphetamine, opium,
oxycodone, oxycodone (for conversion),
oxymorphone, oxymorphone (for
conversion), tetrahydrocannabinols, and
thebaine were insufficient to provide for
the estimated medical, scientific,
research, and industrial needs of the
United States, for export requirements
and for the establishment and
maintenance of reserve stocks.
DEA has taken into consideration the
above comments along with the relevant
2005 year-end inventories, initial 2006
manufacturing quotas, 2006 export
requirements, actual and projected 2006
sales, research, product development
requirements and additional
applications received. Based on this
information, the DEA has adjusted the
final 2006 aggregate production quotas
for alfentanil, codeine (for conversion),
dextropropoxyphene, dihydromorphine,
hydrocodone, hydromorphone,
morphine (for conversion), N,Ndimethylamphetamine, opium,
oxycodone, oxycodone (for conversion),
oxymorphone, oxymorphone (for
conversion), tetrahydrocannabinols, and
thebaine to meet the legitimate needs of
the United States.
Regarding amphetamine,
dihydrocodeine, diphenoxylate,
fentanyl, gamma hydroxybutyric acid,
hydromorphinol, methadone, and
methylphenidate, the DEA has
determined that the proposed revised
2006 aggregate production quotas are
sufficient to meet the current 2006
estimated medical, scientific, research,
and industrial needs of the United
States and to provide for adequate
inventories.
Therefore, under the authority vested
in the Attorney General by Section 306
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 826), and
delegated to the Administrator of the
DEA by 28 CFR 0.100, and redelegated
to the Deputy Administrator, pursuant
to 28 CFR 0.104, the Deputy
Administrator hereby orders that the
2006 final aggregate production quotas
for the following controlled substances,
expressed in grams of anhydrous acid or
base, be established as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 202 (Thursday, October 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61801-61803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA-300P]
Assessment of Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals Ephedrine,
Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 2007: Proposed
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed year 2007 assessment of annual needs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice proposes initial year 2007 assessment of annual
needs for certain List I chemicals in accordance with the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), enacted on March 9, 2006.
The Act required DEA to establish production quotas and import quotas
for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine. This effort
was done in order to prevent the illicit use of these three chemicals
in the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine. The enactment of the
CMEA places additional regulatory controls upon the manufacture,
distribution, importation and exportation of the three List I
chemicals.
DATES: Comments or objections must be received on or before December 4,
2006.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-300P'' on all written and electronic correspondence.
Written comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL. Written comments sent via express
mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson Davis Highway, Alexandria,
VA 22301. Comments may be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. DEA
will accept attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only. DEA will not accept
any file format other than those specifically listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, by e-mail, ode@dea.usdoj.gov or by fax, (202)
353-1263.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 713 of the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (Title VII of Pub. L. 109-177) (CMEA) amended
section 306 of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (Title 21 United
States Code (U.S.C.) Sec. 826 ``Production quotas for controlled
substances'') by adding ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine to existing language to read as follows: ``The
Attorney General shall determine the total quantity and establish
production quotas for each basic class of controlled substance in
schedules I and II and for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine to be manufactured each calendar year to provide
for the estimated medical, scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States, for lawful export requirements, and for the
establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks.'' Further, Sec. 715
of CMEA amended 21 U.S.C. Sec. 952 ``Importation of controlled
substances'' by adding the same List I chemicals to the existing
language in paragraph (a), and by adding a new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
(a) Controlled substances in schedule I or II and narcotic drugs
in schedule III, IV, or V; exceptions:
It shall be unlawful to import into the customs territory of the
United States from any place outside thereof (but within the United
States), or to import into the United States from any place outside
thereof, any controlled substance in schedule I or II of subchapter
I of this chapter, or any narcotic drug in schedule III, IV, or V of
subchapter I of this chapter, or ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine, except that--
(1) such amounts of crude opium, poppy straw, concentrate of
poppy straw, and coca leaves, and of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine, as the Attorney General finds to be necessary
to provide for medical, scientific, or other legitimate purposes,
and * * *
(d)(1) With respect to a registrant under section 958 who is
authorized under subsection (a)(1) to import ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine, at any time during the year
the registrant may apply for an increase in the amount of such
chemical that the registrant is authorized to import, and the
Attorney General may approve the application if the Attorney General
determines that the approval is necessary to provide for medical,
scientific, or other legitimate purposes regarding the chemical.
Note: This excerpt of the amendment is published for the
convenience of the reader. The official text is published at 21
U.S.C. 952(a) and (d)(1).
The responsibility for establishing the assessment of annual needs
has been delegated to the Administrator of the DEA by Sec. 0.100 of
Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Administrator, in
turn, has redelegated this function to the Deputy Administrator,
pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations Title 28 Sec. 0.104.
The proposed year 2007 assessment of annual needs represents those
quantities of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine which
may be manufactured domestically and/or imported into the United States
to provide adequate supplies of each substance for: The estimated
medical, scientific, research, and industrial needs of the United
States; lawful export requirements; and the establishment and
maintenance of reserve stocks.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical Needs of the United States for
Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine
Since the manufacture and importation of ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine have not been previously
regulated through the establishment of an assessment of annual needs,
the Drug Enforcement Administration obtained assistance from a private
independent contractor, IMS Health Government Solutions (IMS), to
develop the proposed initial estimate of the medical needs of the
United States of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine.
IMS' estimates of medical needs for ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
were derived from 2005 data that the company routinely collects and
offers to customers in order to understand the pharmaceutical market.
For this analysis, IMS utilized the following types of data: (1) Sales
to retail establishments (including pharmacies), (2) sales by retail
establishments to patients, and (3) medical insurance claims. IMS'
estimates of medical needs were intended to encompass only those
products containing either ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, whether
requiring a
[[Page 61802]]
prescription or available over-the-counter (OTC). Its estimates of use
encompassed those products containing ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
which are lawfully marketed under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Although no direct estimates for the assessment of annual needs are
currently available, IMS utilized information from a variety of data
sources to develop three independent measures (as described in the next
paragraph). After each of the three independent measures were
calculated for ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, IMS then took a weighted
average of the three individual estimates in order to derive its final
estimate which was then considered by DEA. The weighted average was
determined based on IMS' confidence in each individual estimate such
that estimates with less confidence were given less weight.
The first estimate was based upon product sales to retail outlets,
from IMS' National Sales Perspective (NSP) service. This estimate was
supplemented with information from: IMS' Drug Distribution Database
(DDD) and National Prescription Audit (NPA), ACNielsen's Scantrack (ST)
and Homescan (HS) services. The second estimate was based upon product
sales to customers, from NPA, ST, and HS services, supplemented with
information from DDD and NSP services. The third estimate was based
upon patient prescription claims data from IMS' ReferencePoint (RP)
database, supplemented with information from United States Census
Bureau population estimates and IMS' National Disease and Therapeutic
Index (NDTI), NSP, DDD, ST, and HS services. A copy of the IMS report
may be obtained from DEA Diversion Web site at: https://
www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov.
Based on the IMS report, DEA concluded that 3,800 kg of ephedrine
and 350,700 kg of pseudoephedrine were required to meet the medical
needs of the United States.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical Needs of the United States for
Phenylpropanolamine
DEA did not request that IMS determine the medical needs for
phenylpropanolamine. In November 2000, the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) issued a public health warning for phenylpropanolamine and
requested that all drug companies discontinue marketing products
containing phenylpropanolamine due to the drug's association with risk
for hemorrhagic stroke. In response to the FDA's warning, many
companies voluntarily reformulated their products to exclude
phenylpropanolamine. Subsequently, on December 22, 2005, FDA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (70 FR 75988) to reclassify all over-
the-counter nasal decongestants and weight control drug products
containing phenylpropanolamine preparations from their previously
proposed monograph status (Category 1) to nonmonograph (Category II).
FDA concluded that drug products containing phenylpropanolamine cannot
be generally recognized as safe and should no longer be available for
over-the-counter use in humans. Therefore, for purposes of calculating
the medical needs of the United States for phenylpropanolamine, DEA
considered the drug's use in veterinary products only.
DEA obtained from the FDA a list of all companies that manufacture
veterinary products containing phenylpropanolamine. DEA contacted each
company and requested information relating to sales of their
phenylpropanolamine-containing products. Based on this review, DEA
concluded that 4,354 kg were required to meet the medical needs of the
United States.
Calculation of the Assessment: Industrial Needs, Export and Inventory
Requirements
After DEA considered the medical needs for ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine (veterinary products), it then
considered: (1) Industrial needs of the United States, (2) lawful
export requirements, and (3) maintenance of reserve stocks to determine
the assessment of annual needs for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine.
In consideration of the industrial needs of the United States for
these three chemicals, DEA considered the use of ephedrine for the
domestic manufacture of pseudoephedrine in 2005 and the amount of
phenylpropanolamine used for the domestic manufacture of amphetamine in
2005.
In consideration of the requirements for lawful export purposes for
these three chemicals, DEA considered total 2005 exports as provided on
the DEA-Form 486 entitled ``Import/Export Declaration--Precursors and
Essential Chemicals.'' Exports reported on the DEA-486 were as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 export
List I chemicals quantity (kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ephedrine............................................... 2,540
Pseudoephedrine......................................... 90,260
Phenylpropanolamine..................................... 320
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In consideration of the amounts required for the maintenance of
reserve stocks, DEA considered 20% of the estimated medical and
industrial requirements.
Based on this information, the Deputy Administrator hereby proposes
that the year 2007 assessment of annual needs for the following List I
chemicals, expressed in kilograms of anhydrous base or acid, be
established as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed
year 2007
List I chemicals quotas
(kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ephedrine (for sale)........................................ 7,100 kg
Ephedrine (for conversion).................................. 128,760 kg
Pseudoephedrine (for sale).................................. 511,100 kg
Phenylpropanolamine (for sale).............................. 5,545 kg
Phenylpropanolamine (for conversion)........................ 6,240 kg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ephedrine (for conversion) refers to the industrial use of
ephedrine, i.e., that which will be converted to pseudoephedrine.
Phenylpropanolamine (for conversion) refers to the industrial use of
phenylpropanolamine, i.e., that which will be converted to amphetamine
by the pharmaceutical industry. The ``for sale'' quotas refer to the
amount of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine used for
purposes outside of the above-mentioned conversions.
All interested persons are invited to submit their comments in
writing or electronically regarding this proposal following the
procedures in the ADDRESSES section of this document. A person may
object to or comment on the proposal relating to any of the above-
mentioned chemicals without filing comments or objections regarding the
others. If a person believes that one or more of these issues warrant a
hearing, the individual should so state and summarize the reasons for
this belief.
In the event that comments or objections to this proposal raise one
or more issues which the Deputy Administrator finds warrant a hearing,
the Deputy Administrator shall order a public hearing by notice in the
Federal Register, summarizing the issues to be heard and setting the
time for the hearing.
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that notices of
quotas are not subject to centralized review under Executive Order
12866.
[[Page 61803]]
This action does not preempt or modify any provision of State law;
nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any State; nor does
it diminish the power of any State to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this action does not have any federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this action will
have no significant impact upon small entities whose interests must be
considered under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
The establishment of quotas for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine is mandated by law. The quotas are necessary to
provide for the estimated medical, scientific, research and industrial
needs of the United States, for export requirements and the
establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks. While quotas are of
primary importance to large manufacturers, their impact upon small
entities is neither negative nor beneficial. Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator has determined that this action does not require a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
This action meets the applicable standards set forth in Sec. Sec.
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform.
This action will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$118,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
This action is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Congressional Review Act). This action will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of
United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-17526 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P