Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request, 61796-61797 [E6-17514]
Download as PDF
61796
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Notices
comments. Any determination by the
BLM to release or withhold the names
and/or addresses of those who comment
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
Such requests will be honored to the
extent allowed by law.
Any adverse comments will be
reviewed by the Nevada State Director,
who may sustain, vacate, or modify this
realty action and issue a final
determination. In the absence of timely
filed objections, this realty action will
become the final determination of the
Department of the Interior.
(Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1–2(a))
Dated: August 31, 2006.
Alan R. Buehler,
Acting Assistant Field Manager, Tonopah.
[FR Doc. E6–17399 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–926–07–1420–BJ–TRST]
Montana: Filing of Plat of Survey
Bureau of Land Management,
Montana State Office, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of
Survey.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM Montana State Office, Billings,
Montana, (30) days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marvin Montoya, Cadastral Surveyor,
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of
Land Management, 5001 Southgate
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669,
telephone (406) 896–5124 or (406) 896–
5009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
survey was executed at the request of
the Regional Director, Rocky Mountain
Region, Billings, Montana, and was
necessary to determine Trust and Tribal
lands.
the meanders of the present left bank of the
Missouri River, downstream through sections
14 and 15, and through a portion of section
16, the limits of erosion, downstream through
sections 14 and 15, the meanders of the
former left bank of certain relicted channels
in sections 14 and 15, and the medial line of
certain relicted channels in sections 14 and
15, certain division of accretion and partition
lines, and two islands Tracts 37 and 38,
Township 27 North, Range 50 East, Principal
Meridian, Montana, was accepted October 5,
2006.
We will place a copy of the plat, in
2 sheets, and related field notes we
described in the open files. They will be
available to the public as a matter of
information.
If BLM receives a protest against this
survey, as shown on this plat, in 2
sheets, prior to the date of the official
filing, we will stay the filing pending
our consideration of the protest.
We will not officially file this plat, in
2 sheets, until the day after we have
accepted or dismissed all protests and
they have become final, including
decisions or appeals.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
Thomas M. Deiling,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of
Resources.
[FR Doc. E6–17422 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
SUMMARY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The lands we surveyed are:
Principal Meridian, Montana
T. 27 N., R. 50 E.
The plat, in 2 sheets, representing the
corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of
the subdivisional lines, a portion of the
subdivision of sections 15 and 16, and the
division of accretion lines in sections 15 and
16, and the dependent resurvey of a portion
of the subdivisional lines, a portion of the
subdivision of sections 14, 15, and 16, the
adjusted original meanders of the former left
bank of the Missouri River, downstream
through sections 14, 15, and 16, and the
subdivision of section 14, and the survey of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submitted for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a new information
collection (1010–NEW).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), we are notifying the public that
we have submitted to OMB an
information collection request (ICR) for
a new approval of the paperwork
requirements that address the narrative
portion only of MMS’s Coastal Impact
Assistance Program (CIAP) which is a
grant program.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave
responsibility to MMS for CIAP by
amending Section 31 of the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.
1356a; Appendix A).
This notice also provides the public a
second opportunity to comment on the
paperwork burden of these regulatory
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submit written comments by
November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this information collection directly
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of the
Interior via OMB e-mail:
(OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by
fax (202) 395–6566; identify with (1010–
NEW).
Submit a copy of your comments to
the Department of the Interior, MMS,
via:
• MMS’s Public Connect on-line
commenting system, https://
ocsconnect.mms.gov. Follow the
instructions on the Web site for
submitting comments.
• E-mail MMS at
rules.comments@mms.gov. Use
Information Collection Number 1010–
NEW, CIAP, in the subject line.
• Fax: 703–787–1093. Identify with
Information Collection Number 1010–
NEW, CIAP.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention: Rules
Processing Team (RPT); 381 Elden
Street, MS–4024; Herndon, Virginia
20170–4817. Please reference
‘‘Information Collection 1010-NEW,
CIAP’’ in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Blundon, Rules Processing
Team, (703) 787–1600. You may also
contact Cheryl Blundon to obtain a
copy, at no cost, of the ICR and the
authority that require the subject
collection of information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Coastal Impact Assistance
Program.
OMB Control Number: 1010–NEW.
Abstract: With the passage of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct), the
Minerals Management Service (MMS)
was given responsibility for the Coastal
Impact Assistance Program (CIAP)
through the amendment of Section 31 of
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
(43 U.S.C. 1356a Appendix A). The
program was authorized for FY 2007,
2008, 2009, and 2010.
The CIAP recognizes that impacts
from Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil
and gas activities fall disproportionately
on the coastal states and localities
nearest to where the activities occur,
and where associated facilities are
located. The CIAP legislation
appropriates money for eligible states
and coastal political subdivisions for
coastal restoration/improvement
projects. MMS shall disburse $250
million for each FY 2007 through 2010
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Notices
to eligible producing states and coastal
political subdivisions (CPSs) through a
grant program. The funds allocated to
each state are based on the proportion
of qualified OCS revenues offshore the
individual state to total qualified OCS
revenues from all states. In order to
receive funds, the states submit CIAP
narratives detailing how the funds will
be expended. Alabama, Alaska,
California, Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Texas are the only eligible states under
EPAct. Counties, parishes, or equivalent
units of government within those states
lying all or in part within the coastal
zone, as defined by section 304(1) of the
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1972, as amended, are the coastal
political subdivisions eligible for CIAP
funding, a total of 67 local jurisdictions.
To approve a plan, legislation requires
that the Secretary of the Interior must be
able to determine that the funds will be
used in accordance with EPAct criteria
and that projects will use the funds
according to the EPAct. To confirm
appropriate use of funds, MMS requires
affirmation of grantees meeting Federal,
state, and local laws and adequate
project descriptions. To accomplish
this, MMS is providing in its CIAP
Environmental Assessment a suggested
narrative format to be followed by each
applicant for a CIAP grant. This
narrative will assist MMS in its review
of applications to determine that
adequate and appropriate measures
were taken to meet the laws that affect
the proposed coastal projects. This
narrative will be submitted
electronically as part of the grant
application. At that time, applicants
will be obliged to fill out several OMBapproved standard forms as well. Most
of the eligible states and CPSs, as
experienced grant applicants, will be
familiar with this narrative request.
This information collection request
(ICR) addresses the narrative portion
only of the MMS CIAP grant program.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Number and Description of
Respondents: Approximately 73 total
respondents. This includes 6 states and
67 boroughs, parishes, etc.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: The
estimated annual ‘‘hour’’ burden for this
information collection is a total of
12,600 hours. In calculating the
burdens, we assumed that respondents
perform certain requirements in the
normal course of their activities. We
consider these to be usual and
customary and took that into account in
estimating the burden. There are
approximately six states and 67
parishes, boroughs, counties, etc.
Submissions are generally on an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
occasion basis. The estimated annual
‘‘hour’’ burden for this information
collection is a total of 12,600 hours. We
expect each project narrative will take
42 hours to complete. We anticipate an
average of 300 projects per year. Based
on a cost factor of $50 per hour, we
estimate the total annual cost to
industry is $630,000 (42 hrs × 300
projects = 12,600 hrs × $50 per hour =
$630,000).
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: We have identified no
paperwork ‘‘non-hour cost’’ burdens
associated with the collection of
information.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obligated to respond.
Comments: Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.)
requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide
notice * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *’’
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public
consultation process according to
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), we published a
Federal Register notice (71 FR 29666,
May 23, 2006) outlining the collection
of information and announcing that we
would submit this ICR to OMB for
approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. We
have received no comments in response
to this effort.
If you wish to comment in response
to this notice, you may send your
comments to the offices listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. OMB
has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collection
but may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61797
public comments by November 20,
2006.
Public Comment Procedures: MMS’s
practice is to make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review. If you wish
your name and/or address to be
withheld, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. MMS will honor the request
to the extent allowable by the law;
however, anonymous comments will
not be considered. There may be
circumstances in which we would
withhold from the record a respondent’s
identity, as allowable by the law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. In addition, you must present
a rationale for withholding this
information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure ‘‘would
constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy.’’ Unsupported assertions will
not meet this burden. In the absence of
exceptional, documentable
circumstances, this information will be
released. All submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
MMS Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (202)
208–7744.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–17514 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Upper Truckee River and Marsh
Restoration Project, El Dorado County,
CA
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report (EIS/EIS/
EIR) and notice of scoping meetings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the Tahoe Regional
Planning Agency (TRPA) Compact and
Chapter 5 of the TRPA Code of
Ordinances, and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 202 (Thursday, October 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61796-61797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17514]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a new information collection (1010-NEW).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), we
are notifying the public that we have submitted to OMB an information
collection request (ICR) for a new approval of the paperwork
requirements that address the narrative portion only of MMS's Coastal
Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) which is a grant program.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave responsibility to MMS for CIAP
by amending Section 31 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43
U.S.C. 1356a; Appendix A).
This notice also provides the public a second opportunity to
comment on the paperwork burden of these regulatory requirements.
DATES: Submit written comments by November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this information collection
directly to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for
the Department of the Interior via OMB e-mail: (OIRA--
DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by fax (202) 395-6566; identify with (1010-
NEW).
Submit a copy of your comments to the Department of the Interior,
MMS, via:
MMS's Public Connect on-line commenting system, https://
ocsconnect.mms.gov. Follow the instructions on the Web site for
submitting comments.
E-mail MMS at rules.comments@mms.gov. Use Information
Collection Number 1010-NEW, CIAP, in the subject line.
Fax: 703-787-1093. Identify with Information Collection
Number 1010-NEW, CIAP.
Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the
Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Rules Processing Team
(RPT); 381 Elden Street, MS-4024; Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. Please
reference ``Information Collection 1010-NEW, CIAP'' in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Blundon, Rules Processing Team,
(703) 787-1600. You may also contact Cheryl Blundon to obtain a copy,
at no cost, of the ICR and the authority that require the subject
collection of information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Coastal Impact Assistance Program.
OMB Control Number: 1010-NEW.
Abstract: With the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct), the Minerals Management Service (MMS) was given responsibility
for the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) through the amendment
of Section 31 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a
Appendix A). The program was authorized for FY 2007, 2008, 2009, and
2010.
The CIAP recognizes that impacts from Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
oil and gas activities fall disproportionately on the coastal states
and localities nearest to where the activities occur, and where
associated facilities are located. The CIAP legislation appropriates
money for eligible states and coastal political subdivisions for
coastal restoration/improvement projects. MMS shall disburse $250
million for each FY 2007 through 2010
[[Page 61797]]
to eligible producing states and coastal political subdivisions (CPSs)
through a grant program. The funds allocated to each state are based on
the proportion of qualified OCS revenues offshore the individual state
to total qualified OCS revenues from all states. In order to receive
funds, the states submit CIAP narratives detailing how the funds will
be expended. Alabama, Alaska, California, Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Texas are the only eligible states under EPAct. Counties, parishes, or
equivalent units of government within those states lying all or in part
within the coastal zone, as defined by section 304(1) of the Coastal
Zone Management Act (CZMA) 1972, as amended, are the coastal political
subdivisions eligible for CIAP funding, a total of 67 local
jurisdictions.
To approve a plan, legislation requires that the Secretary of the
Interior must be able to determine that the funds will be used in
accordance with EPAct criteria and that projects will use the funds
according to the EPAct. To confirm appropriate use of funds, MMS
requires affirmation of grantees meeting Federal, state, and local laws
and adequate project descriptions. To accomplish this, MMS is providing
in its CIAP Environmental Assessment a suggested narrative format to be
followed by each applicant for a CIAP grant. This narrative will assist
MMS in its review of applications to determine that adequate and
appropriate measures were taken to meet the laws that affect the
proposed coastal projects. This narrative will be submitted
electronically as part of the grant application. At that time,
applicants will be obliged to fill out several OMB-approved standard
forms as well. Most of the eligible states and CPSs, as experienced
grant applicants, will be familiar with this narrative request.
This information collection request (ICR) addresses the narrative
portion only of the MMS CIAP grant program.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Number and Description of Respondents: Approximately 73
total respondents. This includes 6 states and 67 boroughs, parishes,
etc.
Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ``Hour'' Burden: The
estimated annual ``hour'' burden for this information collection is a
total of 12,600 hours. In calculating the burdens, we assumed that
respondents perform certain requirements in the normal course of their
activities. We consider these to be usual and customary and took that
into account in estimating the burden. There are approximately six
states and 67 parishes, boroughs, counties, etc. Submissions are
generally on an occasion basis. The estimated annual ``hour'' burden
for this information collection is a total of 12,600 hours. We expect
each project narrative will take 42 hours to complete. We anticipate an
average of 300 projects per year. Based on a cost factor of $50 per
hour, we estimate the total annual cost to industry is $630,000 (42 hrs
x 300 projects = 12,600 hrs x $50 per hour = $630,000).
Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping ``Non-Hour Cost'' Burden: We
have identified no paperwork ``non-hour cost'' burdens associated with
the collection of information.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.)
provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of information, you are not obligated
to respond.
Comments: Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.) requires each agency ``* * * to provide notice * * * and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed collection of information * * *'' Agencies
must specifically solicit comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the agency to
perform its duties, including whether the information is useful; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public consultation process according to section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), we published a
Federal Register notice (71 FR 29666, May 23, 2006) outlining the
collection of information and announcing that we would submit this ICR
to OMB for approval. The notice provided the required 60-day comment
period. We have received no comments in response to this effort.
If you wish to comment in response to this notice, you may send
your comments to the offices listed under the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, to ensure maximum consideration, OMB should receive
public comments by November 20, 2006.
Public Comment Procedures: MMS's practice is to make comments,
including names and addresses of respondents, available for public
review. If you wish your name and/or address to be withheld, you must
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. MMS will honor
the request to the extent allowable by the law; however, anonymous
comments will not be considered. There may be circumstances in which we
would withhold from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable by
the law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. In addition,
you must present a rationale for withholding this information. This
rationale must demonstrate that disclosure ``would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy.'' Unsupported assertions will not meet
this burden. In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances,
this information will be released. All submissions from organizations
or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in their entirety.
MMS Information Collection Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (202)
208-7744.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-17514 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P