Nebraska Public Power District; Cooper Nuclear Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 61074-61075 [E6-17245]
Download as PDF
61074
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–298]
Nebraska Public Power District;
Cooper Nuclear Station; Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), paragraph 50.54(o), and 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix J, for Facility
Operating License No. DPR–46, issued
to Nebraska Public Power District
(NPPD or the licensee) for operation of
the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS),
located in Nemaha County, Nebraska.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
NPPD from requirements to include
main steam isolation valve (MSIV)
leakage in (a) the overall integrated
leakage rate test measurement required
by section III.A of Appendix J, Option
B, and (b) the sum of local leak rate test
measurements required by section III.B
of Appendix J, Option B.
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application, dated
March 15, 2006, for exemption from
certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(o)
as defined in 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
J.
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
The Need for the Proposed Action
Paragraph 50.54(o) of 10 CFR part 50
requires that primary reactor
containments for water cooled power
reactors be subject to the requirements
of Appendix J to 10 CFR part 50.
Appendix J specifies the leakage test
requirements, schedules, and
acceptance criteria for tests of the leak
tight integrity of the primary reactor
containment, and of systems and
components which penetrate the
containment. Option B, section III.A
requires that the overall integrated leak
rate not exceed the allowable leakage
(La) with margin, as specified in the
Technical Specifications (TSs). The
overall integrated leak rate, as specified
in the 10 CFR part 50, Appendix J
definitions, includes the contribution
from MSIV leakage. By letter dated
March 15, 2006, the licensee has
requested an exemption from Option B,
section III.A, requirements to permit
exclusion of MSIV leakage from the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:06 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
overall integrated leak rate test
measurement. Option B, section III.B of
10 CFR part 50, Appendix J, requires
that the sum of the leakage rates of Type
B and Type C local leak rate tests be less
than the performance criterion (La) with
margin, as specified in the TSs. The
licensee’s letter also requests an
exemption from this requirement, to
permit exclusion of the MSIV
contribution to the sum of the Type B
and Type C tests.
The above-cited requirements of
Appendix J require that MSIV leakage
measurements be grouped with the
leakage measurements of other
containment penetrations when
containment leakage tests are
performed. These requirements are
inconsistent with the design of the CNS
and the analytical models used to
calculate the radiological consequences
of design-basis accidents. At CNS, and
similar facilities, the leakage from
primary containment penetrations,
under accident conditions, is collected
and treated by the secondary
containment system, or would bypass
the secondary containment. However,
the leakage from the MSIVs is collected
and treated via an Alternative Leakage
Treatment (ALT) path having different
mitigation characteristics. In performing
accident analyses, it is appropriate to
group various leakage effluents
according to the treatment they receive
before being released to the
environment (i.e., bypass leakage is
grouped, leakage into secondary
containment is grouped, and ALT
leakage is grouped), with specific limits
for each group defined in the TSs. The
proposed exemption would permit ALT
path leakage to be independently
grouped with its unique leakage limits.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation
of the proposed action and concludes
that the environmental impacts would
not be significant. The proposed action
will not significantly increase the
probability or consequences of
accidents. No changes are being made in
the types of effluents that may be
released off site. There is no significant
increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure. Therefore, there are
no significant radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect
any historical sites. It does not affect
non-radiological plant effluents and has
no other environmental impact.
Therefore, there are no significant non-
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
radiological impacts associated with the
proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no action’’
alternative). Denial of the application
would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the alternative action are
similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action does not involve the use
of any different resources than those
previously considered in the Final
Environmental Statement dated
February 1973 for CNS.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
on September 26, 2006, the NRC staff
consulted with the Nebraska State
official, Ms. Julia Schmitt the Nebraska
Department of Public Service, regarding
the environmental impact of the
proposed action. The State official had
no comments on the environmental
impact of the proposed exemption.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the licensee’s letter dated
March 15, 2006. Documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publically available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the NRC
Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of October 2006.
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian Benney,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–17245 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Week of October 30, 2006—Tentative
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
There are not meetings scheduled for
the Week of October 30, 2006.
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
DATE: Weeks of October 16, 23, 30,
November 6, 13, 20, 2006.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
WEEK OF OCTOBER 16, 2006
Monday, October 16, 2006
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Status of New
Reactor Issues—Combined Operating
Licenses (COLS) (morning session).
1:30 p.m. Briefing on Status on New
Reactor Issues—Combined Operating
Licenses (COLS) (afternoon session)
(Public Meetings) (Contact: Dave
Matthews, 301–415–1199).
These meetings will be Webcast live
at the Web address—https://
www.nrc.gov.
Friday, October 20, 2006
2:30 p.m. Meeting with Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards
(ACRS) (Public Meeting) (Contact: John
Larkins, 301–415–7360).
These meetings will be Webcast live
at the Web address—https://
www.nrc.gov.
Week of October 23, 2006—Tentative
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Transshipment
and Domestic Shipment Security of
Radioactive Material Quantities of
Concern (RAMQC) (Closed—Ex. 3)
(morning session).
1:30 p.m. Briefing on Transshipment
and Domestic Shipment Security of
Radioactive Material Quantities of
Concern (RAMQC) (Closed—Ex. 3 & 9)
(afternoon session).
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
9:30 a.m. Briefing on
Institutionalization and Integration of
Agency Lessons Learned (Public
Meeting) (Contact: John Lamb, 301–415–
1727).
These meetings will be Webcast live
at the Web address—https://
www.nrc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:06 Oct 18, 2006
1:30 p.m. Briefing on Resolution of
GSI–191, Assessment of Debris
Accumulation on PWR Sump
Performance (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Michael L. Scott, 301–415–0565).
These meetings will be Webcast live
at the Web address—https://
www.nrc.gov.
Jkt 211001
Week of November 8, 2006—Tentative
Wednesday, November 8, 2006
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Digital
Instrumentation and Control (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Paul Rebstock, 301–
415–3295).
This meeting will be Webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
Thursday, November 9, 2005
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Draft Final
Rule—Part 52 (Early Site permits/
Standard Design Certification/Combined
Licenses) (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Dave Matthews, 301–415–1199).
This meeting will be Webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
Week of November 13, 2006—Tentative
There are not meetings scheduled for
the Week of November 13, 2006.
Week of November 20, 2006—Tentative
There are not meetings scheduled for
the Week of November 20, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
*The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Michelle Schroll, (301) 415–1662.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/
policy-making/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify the
NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator,
Deborah Chan, at 301–415–7041, TDD:
301–415–2100, or by e-mail at
DLC@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61075
This notice is distributed by mail to
several hundred subscribers; if you no
longer wish to receive, or would like to
be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969).
In addition, distribution of this meeting
notice over the Internet system is
available. If you are interested in
receiving this Commission meeting
schedule electronically, please send an
electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
R. Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–8740 Filed 10–13–06; 10:12 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Notice of Opportunity To Comment on
Model Safety Evaluation on Technical
Specification Improvement To Modify
Requirements Regarding Control
Room Envelope HabitabilityUsing the
Consolidated Line Item Improvement
Process
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the staff of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has prepared a
model safety evaluation (SE) and model
application relating to the modification
of technical specification (TS)
requirements regarding the habitability
of the control room envelope (CRE). The
NRC staff has also prepared a model nosignificant-hazards-consideration
(NSHC) determination relating to this
matter. The purpose of these models is
to permit the NRC to efficiently process
amendments that propose to revise the
CRE emergency ventilation system TS
action and surveillance requirements for
the CRE boundary, and to add a new TS
administrative controls program,
‘‘Control Room Envelope Habitability
Program.’’ Licensees of nuclear power
reactors to which the models apply
could then request amendments,
confirming the applicability of the SE
and NSHC determination to their
reactors. The NRC staff is requesting
comment on the model SE and model
NSHC determination prior to
announcing their availability for
referencing in license amendment
applications.
The comment period expires
November 16, 2006. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the Commission
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61074-61075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17245]
[[Page 61074]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-298]
Nebraska Public Power District; Cooper Nuclear Station;
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.54(o), and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
J, for Facility Operating License No. DPR-46, issued to Nebraska Public
Power District (NPPD or the licensee) for operation of the Cooper
Nuclear Station (CNS), located in Nemaha County, Nebraska. Therefore,
as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt NPPD from requirements to include
main steam isolation valve (MSIV) leakage in (a) the overall integrated
leakage rate test measurement required by section III.A of Appendix J,
Option B, and (b) the sum of local leak rate test measurements required
by section III.B of Appendix J, Option B.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application, dated March 15, 2006, for exemption from certain
requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(o) as defined in 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
J.
The Need for the Proposed Action
Paragraph 50.54(o) of 10 CFR part 50 requires that primary reactor
containments for water cooled power reactors be subject to the
requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR part 50. Appendix J specifies the
leakage test requirements, schedules, and acceptance criteria for tests
of the leak tight integrity of the primary reactor containment, and of
systems and components which penetrate the containment. Option B,
section III.A requires that the overall integrated leak rate not exceed
the allowable leakage (La) with margin, as specified in the Technical
Specifications (TSs). The overall integrated leak rate, as specified in
the 10 CFR part 50, Appendix J definitions, includes the contribution
from MSIV leakage. By letter dated March 15, 2006, the licensee has
requested an exemption from Option B, section III.A, requirements to
permit exclusion of MSIV leakage from the overall integrated leak rate
test measurement. Option B, section III.B of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
J, requires that the sum of the leakage rates of Type B and Type C
local leak rate tests be less than the performance criterion (La) with
margin, as specified in the TSs. The licensee's letter also requests an
exemption from this requirement, to permit exclusion of the MSIV
contribution to the sum of the Type B and Type C tests.
The above-cited requirements of Appendix J require that MSIV
leakage measurements be grouped with the leakage measurements of other
containment penetrations when containment leakage tests are performed.
These requirements are inconsistent with the design of the CNS and the
analytical models used to calculate the radiological consequences of
design-basis accidents. At CNS, and similar facilities, the leakage
from primary containment penetrations, under accident conditions, is
collected and treated by the secondary containment system, or would
bypass the secondary containment. However, the leakage from the MSIVs
is collected and treated via an Alternative Leakage Treatment (ALT)
path having different mitigation characteristics. In performing
accident analyses, it is appropriate to group various leakage effluents
according to the treatment they receive before being released to the
environment (i.e., bypass leakage is grouped, leakage into secondary
containment is grouped, and ALT leakage is grouped), with specific
limits for each group defined in the TSs. The proposed exemption would
permit ALT path leakage to be independently grouped with its unique
leakage limits.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the environmental impacts would not be significant. The
proposed action will not significantly increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes are being made in the types of
effluents that may be released off site. There is no significant
increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there
are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect any historical sites. It
does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-
radiological impacts associated with the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no action'' alternative).
Denial of the application would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action does not involve the use of any different resources
than those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement
dated February 1973 for CNS.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, on September 26, 2006, the
NRC staff consulted with the Nebraska State official, Ms. Julia Schmitt
the Nebraska Department of Public Service, regarding the environmental
impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments on
the environmental impact of the proposed exemption.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's
letter dated March 15, 2006. Documents may be examined, and/or copied
for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publically available records will be accessible
electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the NRC Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do
not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff
by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of October 2006.
[[Page 61075]]
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian Benney,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6-17245 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P