Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits, 61025-61027 [E6-17177]
Download as PDF
61025
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices
TABLE 1 - SPECIES OF CONCERN LIST—Continued
Common Name
Scientific Name
Family
Area of Concern
1
bumphead parrotfish
Bolbometopon muricatum
Scaridae
Indo-Pacific-Red Sea and East Africa to the Line Islands and Samoa; north to Yaeyama, south to the
Great Barrier Reef and New Caledonia; Paulau, Caroline, Mariana in Micronesia; in U.S. it occurs in Guam,
American Samoa, CNMI and the Pacific Remote Island Areas (Wake Islands).
Atlantic wolffish
Anarhichas lupus
Anarhichadidae
Atlantic-Georges Bank and western Gulf of Maine.
white marlin
Tetrapturus albidus
Istiophoridae
Atlantic.
cowcod
Sebastes levis
Scorpaenidae
Pacific-Central OR to central Baja California and Guadalupe Island, Mexico.
bocaccio
Sebastes paucispinis
Scorpaenidae
Pacific-Southern DPS (Northern CA to Mexico).
Atlantic halibut
Hippoglossus hippoglossus
Pleuronectidae
Atlantic-Labrador to southern New England.
speckled hind
Epinephelus drummondhayi
Serranidae
Atlantic-NC to Gulf of Mexico.
warsaw grouper
Epinephelus nigritus
Serranidae
Atlantic-MA southward to Gulf of Mexico.
Nassau grouper
Epinephelus striatus
Serranidae
Atlantic-NC southward to Gulf of Mexico.
Lingula reevii
Lingulidae
Pacific-Hawaii, only Kaneohe Bay.
pink abalone
Haliotis corrugata
Haliotidae
Pacific-Point Conception, CA, to Bahia de Tortuga,
Baja California.
black abalone
Haliotis cracherodii
Haliotidae
Pacific-OR, CA, Baja California.
green abalone
Haliotis fulgens
Haliotidae
Pacific-Point Conception, CA, to Bahia Magdalena,
Baja California.
pinto abalone
Haliotis kamtschatkana
Haliotidae
Pacific-Sitka, AK, to Point Conception, CA.
Hawaiian reef coral
Montipora dilitata
Acroporidae
Pacific-Hawaii (Kaneohe Bay, Midway atoll, and Maro
Reef).
ivory bush coral
Oculina varicosa
Oculinidae
Atlantic-West Indies, Bermuda, NC, FL, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean.
Brachiopoda
inarticulate brachiopod
Mollusks
Anthozoans (Corals)
1 Defines the general geographic area or populations of concern for the species.
DPS = distinct population segment, which is a species for purposes of the ESA.
ESU = evolutionarily significant unit, which is a DPS or species for purposes of the ESA
[FR Doc. E6–17249 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
[I.D. 101206A]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:06 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant
Regional Administrator) has made a
preliminary determination that the
subject exempted fishing permit (EFP)
application contains all the required
information and warrants further
consideration. The Assistant Regional
Administrator has also made a
preliminary determination that the
activities authorized under the EFP
would be consistent with the goals and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
objectives of the Northeast (NE)
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP). Based on preliminary review of
this project, a Categorical Exclusion (CE)
from requirements to prepare either an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
or an Environmental Assessment (EA)
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) appears to be
justified. However, further review and
consultation may be necessary before a
final determination is made to issue the
EFP. Therefore, NMFS announces that
the Assistant Regional Administrator
proposes to recommend that an EFP be
issued that would allow two
commercial fishing vessels to conduct
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
61026
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices
fishing operations that are otherwise
restricted by the regulations governing
the fisheries of the Northeastern United
States. The EFP, which would enable
the applicants to investigate the
feasibility of using a trawl net with
buoyant ground cables and a buoyant
sweep to reduce seabed contact and
improve species selectivity, would
allow for exemptions from the FMP as
follows: Gulf of Maine (GOM) Rolling
Closure Areas II, III, IV, and V for two
vessels; and an exemption from the
days-at-sea (DAS) effort control
requirements for one vessel.
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed EFPs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, 1 Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope ‘‘Comments on the
Buoyant Ground Cables Study.’’
Comments may also be sent via
facsimile (fax) to (978) 281–9135, or
submitted via e-mail to: DA6–
213@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Grant, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9145, fax (978)
281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
complete application for an EFP was
submitted on August 21, 2006, by Kelo
Pinkham of the F/V Jeanne C for a joint
project with Dana Morse, of Maine Sea
Grant, that is funded by the Northeast
Consortium (NEC). The primary goal of
this research is to develop and test a
trawl net with buoyant ground cables
and a buoyant sweep to reduce seabed
contact and increase species selectivity.
The intent of the applicants is to
demonstrate that the experimental net,
if successful, could potentially be
suitable as an alternate gear for vessels
fishing in areas requiring a haddock
separator trawl and/or fishing areas of
hard bottom with the use of mid-water
doors.
The project would be conducted
during the fall of 2006 and spring of
2007 and would include flume tank
trials and 25 days of at-sea trials. An
experimental otter trawl net, which
would have floats incorporated along
both the ground cables and the sweep,
as well as drop chains integrated along
the sweep, would first be constructed
and flume tested. After the flume trials,
one vessel would conduct 5 days of at-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:06 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
sea research using video cameras and a
net-mind system to tune the
performance of the net. A net-mind
system is a net monitoring system that
enables monitoring and managing the
performance of the trawl. During these
first 5 at-sea days, the net would have
an open codend. After determining the
best configuration of ground cables,
floats, drop chains, and sweep position
using the cameras and net-mind system,
the experimental net would be
transferred to the second vessel for
fishing trials. This second vessel would
conduct an additional 20 at-sea days of
research, during which the experimental
net would be compared with a standard
design otter trawl net as a control during
experimental fishing. During these
comparative fishing trials, this single
vessel would conduct four 2-hour tows
per day, alternating each tow between
fishing the experimental net and fishing
the control net. Cameras mounted on
the nets and on tow sleds would be used
to monitor the seabed before and after
towing, as well as net performance and
fish behavior in the mouth of the net.
All fish caught would be weighed and
as many fish as possible would be
measured. All undersized fish, and fish
that cannot legally be retained, would
be returned to the sea as quickly as
practicable after measurement and
examination. The overall catch
estimates expected for this project can
be found in Table 1. The applicants
anticipate that a total of 20,000 lb (9,072
kg) of haddock and pollock (combined),
the two target species, would be
harvested throughout the course of the
study, along with 14,000 lb (6,350 kg) of
non-targeted catch and discards,
including 8,000 lb (3,629 kg) of GOM
cod. The estimated cod catch is 66
percent of the current daily possession
limit of 600 lb (272 kg) (50 percent of
the daily limit of 800 lb (363 kg )
proposed in Framework Adjustment 42)
for the proposed number of DAS. All
legal-sized fish, within the possession
limit, would be sold, with the proceeds
returned to the NEC for the purpose of
enhancing future research.
TABLE 1: ESTIMATED TARGETED
CATCH, NON-TARGETED CATCH AND
DISCARD BY SPECIES—Continued
Targeted
Catch
Non-Targeted
Catch and
Discards
Cod
0
8,000 lb
(3,629 kg)
Gray Sole
0
2,000 lb
(907 kg)
American Plaice
0
2,000 lb
(907 kg)
Monkfish
0
2,000 lb
(907 kg)
Species
All at-sea research would be
conducted from two fishing vessels,
each of which would be fishing in a
different area. This EFP would cover the
F/V Ocean Reporter (permit # 221596,
O.N. 694848) and the F/V Jeanne C
(permit # 230524, O.N. 610415). The F/
V Ocean Reporter would conduct the 5
days of at-sea video and gear tuning
work in the area between the western
border of the Western GOM Closure
Area (42°15′ N. lat., 70°15′ W. long.; and
43°15′ N. lat., 70°15′ W. long.) and the
shore. The F/V Jeanne C would conduct
the 20 days of at-sea experimental
fishing in an area northeast of the
Western GOM Closure Area and
northwest of the Cashes Ledge Closure
Area (see Table 2). Both vessels would
fish exclusively outside the Western
GOM Closed Area.
TABLE 2: COORDINATES FOR EXPERIMENTAL FISHING AREA BY F/V
JEANNE C
Point
N. Lat.
W. Long.
1
43°38′
69°40′
2
43°38′
69°21′
3
43°20′
69°40′
4
43°20′
69°21′
5
43°38′
69°40′
TABLE 1: ESTIMATED TARGETED
CATCH, NON-TARGETED CATCH AND
The applicants have asked for an
DISCARD BY SPECIES
exemption to the regulations at 50 CFR
Targeted
Catch
Non-Targeted
Catch and
Discards
Haddock
10,000 lb
(4,536 kg)
0
Pollock
10,000 lb
(4,536 kg)
0
Species
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
648.81(f)(1)(ii) through (v), GOM Rolling
Closure Areas II, III, IV, and V, for both
the F/V Ocean Reporter and F/V Jeanne
C (for 5 DAS and 20 DAS, respectively)
due to a belief that there will be a better
mixture of flounders, pollock, haddock,
and cod for testing the experimental
gear present in the waters of the western
GOM during these seasonal closures.
Operation during these seasonal
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices
closures would also increase the
availability of the commercial vessels to
work with scientists on the project
because these coastal day boats are
unable to conduct normal commercial
fishing operations during these seasonal
closures.
The applicants have also requested an
exemption to the DAS regulations at 50
CFR 648.82(a) for the F/V Ocean
Reporter while conducting the 5 at-sea
days of video and gear tuning work
because the researchers would tow the
nets with the codend open. With the
exception of a small number of fish that
could be gilled by the net mesh, no fish
would be removed from the water
during these 5 at-sea days of video and
gear tuning work. During the 20 at-sea
days of comparative fishing trials, the F/
V Jeanne C would use A DAS and
would be subject to all day and trip
possession limits.
The applicants may request minor
modifications and extensions to the EFP
throughout the year. EFP modifications
and extensions may be granted without
further notice if they are deemed
essential to facilitate completion of the
proposed research and have minimal
impacts that do not change the scope or
impact of the initially approved EFP
request.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–17177 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 100306G]
Incidental Takes of Marine Mammals
During Specified Activities;
Maintenance Dredging Around Pier 39,
San Francisco, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
take authorization; request for
comments.
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an
application from the Bay Marina
Management Incorporated (BMMI) for
the re-issuance of an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take
small numbers of marine mammals, by
Level B harassment only, incidental to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:06 Oct 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
dredging on the west side of the Pier 39
Marina on the San Francisco waterfront,
CA. NMFS issued an IHA for these
activities in October, 2005; however,
BMMI will be unable to complete the
work by the time the 2005 IHA expires
on October 16, 2006. Therefore, BMMI
has requested a new IHA to cover the
completion of the previously analyzed
and authorized action. Pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an IHA to BMMI
for the take, by Level B Harassment
only, of small numbers of California sea
lions and Pacific harbor seals.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than November 16,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is
PR1.100306G@noaa.gov. NMFS is not
responsible for e-mail comments sent to
addresses other than the one provided
here. Comments sent via e-mail,
including all attachments, must not
exceed a 10–megabyte file size.
A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this
document may be obtained by writing to
the address specified above, telephoning
the contact listed below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or
visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of marine mammals
by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61027
Authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On September 14, 2006, NMFS
received a request from BMMI to reissue an IHA for the take, by
harassment, of small numbers of
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) and Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina) incidental to the
maintenance dredging the I, J, and K
Docks on the west side of Pier 39
Marina on the San Francisco waterfront,
California. NMFS issued an IHA for
these activities in October, 2005 (70 FR
69955); however, BMMI will be unable
to complete the work by the time the
2005 IHA expires on October 16, 2006.
Therefore BMMI has asked for a new
IHA to cover the completion of the
previously analyzed and authorized
action.
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61025-61027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17177]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 101206A]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable
Fisheries, Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant Regional Administrator)
has made a preliminary determination that the subject exempted fishing
permit (EFP) application contains all the required information and
warrants further consideration. The Assistant Regional Administrator
has also made a preliminary determination that the activities
authorized under the EFP would be consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP). Based on preliminary review of this project, a Categorical
Exclusion (CE) from requirements to prepare either an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) or an Environmental Assessment (EA) under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) appears to be justified.
However, further review and consultation may be necessary before a
final determination is made to issue the EFP. Therefore, NMFS announces
that the Assistant Regional Administrator proposes to recommend that an
EFP be issued that would allow two commercial fishing vessels to
conduct
[[Page 61026]]
fishing operations that are otherwise restricted by the regulations
governing the fisheries of the Northeastern United States. The EFP,
which would enable the applicants to investigate the feasibility of
using a trawl net with buoyant ground cables and a buoyant sweep to
reduce seabed contact and improve species selectivity, would allow for
exemptions from the FMP as follows: Gulf of Maine (GOM) Rolling Closure
Areas II, III, IV, and V for two vessels; and an exemption from the
days-at-sea (DAS) effort control requirements for one vessel.
Regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of this notification to provide
interested parties the opportunity to comment on applications for
proposed EFPs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 1 Blackburn
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope
``Comments on the Buoyant Ground Cables Study.'' Comments may also be
sent via facsimile (fax) to (978) 281-9135, or submitted via e-mail to:
DA6-213@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Grant, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281-9145, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A complete application for an EFP was
submitted on August 21, 2006, by Kelo Pinkham of the F/V Jeanne C for a
joint project with Dana Morse, of Maine Sea Grant, that is funded by
the Northeast Consortium (NEC). The primary goal of this research is to
develop and test a trawl net with buoyant ground cables and a buoyant
sweep to reduce seabed contact and increase species selectivity. The
intent of the applicants is to demonstrate that the experimental net,
if successful, could potentially be suitable as an alternate gear for
vessels fishing in areas requiring a haddock separator trawl and/or
fishing areas of hard bottom with the use of mid-water doors.
The project would be conducted during the fall of 2006 and spring
of 2007 and would include flume tank trials and 25 days of at-sea
trials. An experimental otter trawl net, which would have floats
incorporated along both the ground cables and the sweep, as well as
drop chains integrated along the sweep, would first be constructed and
flume tested. After the flume trials, one vessel would conduct 5 days
of at-sea research using video cameras and a net-mind system to tune
the performance of the net. A net-mind system is a net monitoring
system that enables monitoring and managing the performance of the
trawl. During these first 5 at-sea days, the net would have an open
codend. After determining the best configuration of ground cables,
floats, drop chains, and sweep position using the cameras and net-mind
system, the experimental net would be transferred to the second vessel
for fishing trials. This second vessel would conduct an additional 20
at-sea days of research, during which the experimental net would be
compared with a standard design otter trawl net as a control during
experimental fishing. During these comparative fishing trials, this
single vessel would conduct four 2-hour tows per day, alternating each
tow between fishing the experimental net and fishing the control net.
Cameras mounted on the nets and on tow sleds would be used to monitor
the seabed before and after towing, as well as net performance and fish
behavior in the mouth of the net.
All fish caught would be weighed and as many fish as possible would
be measured. All undersized fish, and fish that cannot legally be
retained, would be returned to the sea as quickly as practicable after
measurement and examination. The overall catch estimates expected for
this project can be found in Table 1. The applicants anticipate that a
total of 20,000 lb (9,072 kg) of haddock and pollock (combined), the
two target species, would be harvested throughout the course of the
study, along with 14,000 lb (6,350 kg) of non-targeted catch and
discards, including 8,000 lb (3,629 kg) of GOM cod. The estimated cod
catch is 66 percent of the current daily possession limit of 600 lb
(272 kg) (50 percent of the daily limit of 800 lb (363 kg ) proposed in
Framework Adjustment 42) for the proposed number of DAS. All legal-
sized fish, within the possession limit, would be sold, with the
proceeds returned to the NEC for the purpose of enhancing future
research.
Table 1: Estimated Targeted Catch, Non-Targeted Catch and Discard by
Species
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Targeted Catch and
Species Targeted Catch Discards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haddock 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cod 0 8,000 lb (3,629 kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray Sole 0 2,000 lb (907 kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Plaice 0 2,000 lb (907 kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monkfish 0 2,000 lb (907 kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All at-sea research would be conducted from two fishing vessels,
each of which would be fishing in a different area. This EFP would
cover the F/V Ocean Reporter (permit 221596, O.N. 694848) and
the F/V Jeanne C (permit 230524, O.N. 610415). The F/V Ocean
Reporter would conduct the 5 days of at-sea video and gear tuning work
in the area between the western border of the Western GOM Closure Area
(42[deg]15' N. lat., 70[deg]15' W. long.; and 43[deg]15' N. lat.,
70[deg]15' W. long.) and the shore. The F/V Jeanne C would conduct the
20 days of at-sea experimental fishing in an area northeast of the
Western GOM Closure Area and northwest of the Cashes Ledge Closure Area
(see Table 2). Both vessels would fish exclusively outside the Western
GOM Closed Area.
Table 2: Coordinates for Experimental Fishing Area by F/V Jeanne C
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. Lat. W. Long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 43[deg]38' 69[deg]40'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 43[deg]38' 69[deg]21'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 43[deg]20' 69[deg]40'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 43[deg]20' 69[deg]21'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 43[deg]38' 69[deg]40'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicants have asked for an exemption to the regulations at 50
CFR 648.81(f)(1)(ii) through (v), GOM Rolling Closure Areas II, III,
IV, and V, for both the F/V Ocean Reporter and F/V Jeanne C (for 5 DAS
and 20 DAS, respectively) due to a belief that there will be a better
mixture of flounders, pollock, haddock, and cod for testing the
experimental gear present in the waters of the western GOM during these
seasonal closures. Operation during these seasonal
[[Page 61027]]
closures would also increase the availability of the commercial vessels
to work with scientists on the project because these coastal day boats
are unable to conduct normal commercial fishing operations during these
seasonal closures.
The applicants have also requested an exemption to the DAS
regulations at 50 CFR 648.82(a) for the F/V Ocean Reporter while
conducting the 5 at-sea days of video and gear tuning work because the
researchers would tow the nets with the codend open. With the exception
of a small number of fish that could be gilled by the net mesh, no fish
would be removed from the water during these 5 at-sea days of video and
gear tuning work. During the 20 at-sea days of comparative fishing
trials, the F/V Jeanne C would use A DAS and would be subject to all
day and trip possession limits.
The applicants may request minor modifications and extensions to
the EFP throughout the year. EFP modifications and extensions may be
granted without further notice if they are deemed essential to
facilitate completion of the proposed research and have minimal impacts
that do not change the scope or impact of the initially approved EFP
request.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 12, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6-17177 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S