Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, and Draft Land Protection Plan for Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 61063-61064 [E6-17087]

Download as PDF 61063 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices Beginning date 100103 040104 070104 100104 040105 100105 070106 Ending date ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................. Dated: October 6, 2006. Jayson P. Ahern, Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection. [FR Doc. E6–17150 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 033104 063004 093004 033105 093005 063006 123106 and an orientation for new Public Advisory Committee members. Willie R. Taylor, Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. [FR Doc. E6–17232 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–RG–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of the Secretary Fish and Wildlife Service Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council; Notice of Meeting Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, and Draft Land Protection Plan for Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex AGENCY: ACTION: Office of the Secretary, Interior. Notice of meeting date change. The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is rescheduling the October 18, 2006, public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee to November 2, 2006. SUMMARY: DATES: November 2, 2006, at 8:30 a.m. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Office, 441 West 5th Avenue, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 C Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, 99501, (907) 271–5011. The Public Advisory Committee was created by Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in settlement of United States of America v. State of Alaska, Civil Action No. A91–081 CV. The meeting agenda will include review and recommendations on the draft fiscal year 2007 work plan, an update on the injured resources and services list, an update on the herring restoration effort, bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 04:06 Oct 18, 2006 Jkt 211001 Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP), and Draft Land Protection Plan (LPP) are available for the Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex. We prepared this CCP pursuant to the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); and we describe how the Service intends to manage this Refuge Complex over the next 15 years. This draft LPP was prepared pursuant to Service policy and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and would expand the approved acquisition boundary for the four refuges within the Complex. DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 16, 2007. ADDRESSES: A copy of the Draft EIS, CCP, and LPP is available on a compact disk (CD), and you may obtain a copy by writing: Doug St. Pierre, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System, Southwest Region, PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Overpayments (percent) Underpayments (percent) 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 Corporate overpayments (Eff. 1–1–99) (percent) 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 Division of Planning, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103; or, Andy Loranger, Complex Manager, Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 509 Washington Street, Anahuac, TX 77514. Written comments may be mailed to the above addresses or submitted via electronic mail to: doug_stpierre@fws.gov. You may also access and download copies of the draft document at the following website address: https://southwest.fws.gov/ refuges/Plan/. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Doug St. Pierre, at 505–248– 6636. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Wildlife System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee et seq.) requires a CCP. The purpose in developing CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife science, conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, the CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update these CCPs at least every 15 years in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C 4321–4370d). Background: The Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex contains four refuges: Moody National Wildlife Refuge, Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge, McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge, and Texas Point National Wildlife Refuge. The refuges are located along the Texas Coast, E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM 17OCN1 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES 61064 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Notices between Houston, Texas, and the Louisiana state line in Chambers, Jefferson, and Galveston Counties, Texas. All four refuges include the Migratory Bird Conservation Act as a primary authority and purpose. Moody NWR was established in 1961 and today consists of a conservation easement on approximately 3,516 acres of coastal marsh. Anahuac NWR was established in 1963 and contains 34,339 acres of coastal marsh and adjoining uplands in fee title ownership. McFaddin NWR was established in 1980 and is 58,861 acres of primarily coastal marsh in a mix of fee title and conservation easements. Texas Point NWR was established in 1979 and consists of 8,952 acres of coastal marsh in fee title ownership. The integrated EIS contains two sets of alternatives addressing two separate but related Federal Actions: (1) Refuge management alternatives for development of a CCP for the Complex, and (2) alternatives for expansion of the refuge acquisition boundaries. Five refuge management alternatives are proposed and evaluated for the Refuge Complex. The first management alternative is the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative, required by NEPA, which would continue the current refuge management activities. Current habitat management activities include (1) water management; (2) wetland, prairie, and woodlot restoration; (3) moist soil management units; (4) cooperative rice farming; (5) fire management; (6) controlled livestock grazing; and (7) exotic/invasive species management. The second management alternative emphasizes intensifying management of wetland habitats for waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and other wetland-dependent migratory birds. The third management alternative emphasizes native habitat restoration and addressing threats from coastal land loss, altered hydrology, exotic species, and contaminants. The fourth management alternative, the Service’s preferred alternative, emphasizes an integrated management approach combining (1) expanded habitat management and restoration programs, (2) new research and wildlife population monitoring, and (3) increased efforts to address major threats to ecosystem health. The fifth management alternative emphasizes a passive management approach. All five of these refuge management alternatives make wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. VerDate Aug<31>2005 04:06 Oct 18, 2006 Jkt 211001 Four refuge boundary expansion alternatives are proposed and evaluated. The first expansion alternative is the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative, required by NEPA, which would retain the current refuge acquisition boundaries. The second expansion alternative would expand the refuge boundary for Moody NWR by 5,050 acres; for Anahuac NWR by 20,500 acres; for McFaddin NWR by 7,190 acres; and for Texas Point NWR by 850 acres. The total expansion of 33,590 acres continues the historic focus on land acquisition primarily in coastal marsh and adjacent agricultural uplands. The third expansion alternative, the Service’s preferred alternative, would expand the refuge boundary for Moody NWR by 7,920 acres; for Anahuac NWR by 47,750 acres; for McFaddin NWR by 7,190 acres; and for Texas Point NWR by 1,400 acres. The total expansion of 64,260 acres includes all of the coastal marsh and adjacent agricultural uplands from the second expansion alternative plus two important areas of native coastal prairie. The fourth expansion alternative would expand the refuge boundary for Moody NWR by 7,920 acres, for Anahuac NWR by 64,910, for McFaddin NWR by 29,890 acres, and for Texas Point NWR by 1,400 acres. The total expansion of 104,120 acres includes all of the lands in the third expansion alternative along with a large freshwater marsh north of the current McFaddin NWR and a near-coast bottomland hardwood area important to neotropical migratory birds. Lands acquired in the future would be managed according to the strategies contained in the Service’s preferred management alternative. Public Meetings: The Service will hold at least two public meetings in Chambers and Jefferson Counties, Texas, 30 days after publication of this notice to present the draft document, answer questions, and receive formal public comments. Notice of the meetings will be posted in local newspapers and other media outlets and given through special mailings to individuals and organizations that have expressed interest in this planning effort. Editorial note: This document was received at the Office of the Federal Register October 11, 2006. Dated: April 3, 2006. Geoffrey L. Haskett, Acting, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Albuquerque, New Mexico. [FR Doc. E6–17087 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee U.S. Geological Survey. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: Pursuant to Public Law 106– 503, the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee (SESAC) will hold its fourteenth meeting. The meeting location is the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory, 10002 Isleta Road, SE, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117. The Committee is comprised of members from academia, industry, and State government. The Committee shall advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on matters relating to the USGS’s participation in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. The Committee will provide guidance on the USGS’s contributions to the Global Seismographic Network and report preparation. Meetings of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee are open to the public. DATES: October 30, 2006, commencing at 9 a.m. and adjourning at noon on October 31, 2006. Contact: Dr. David Applegate, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 905, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648–6714, applegate@usgs.gov. SUMMARY: Dated: October 2, 2006. Rama Kotra, Acting Associate Director for Geology. [FR Doc. 06–8716 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4311–AM–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [WY–060–1320–EL, WYW163340] Notice of Intent (NOI) To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Notice of Public Meeting on a Federal Coal Lease Application Filed by the Antelope Coal Company in the Decertified Powder River Federal Coal Production Region, Wyoming Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent and notice of public hearing. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102 (2) (C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM 17OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61063-61064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, and Draft Land Protection Plan 
for Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces that 
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Draft Comprehensive 
Conservation Plan (CCP), and Draft Land Protection Plan (LPP) are 
available for the Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex. 
We prepared this CCP pursuant to the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Improvement Act of 1997, and the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969 (NEPA); and we describe how the Service intends to manage 
this Refuge Complex over the next 15 years. This draft LPP was prepared 
pursuant to Service policy and the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, and would expand the approved acquisition boundary for the four 
refuges within the Complex.

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 16, 2007.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Draft EIS, CCP, and LPP is available on a 
compact disk (CD), and you may obtain a copy by writing: Doug St. 
Pierre, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
National Wildlife Refuge System, Southwest Region, Division of 
Planning, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103; or, Andy Loranger, 
Complex Manager, Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 
509 Washington Street, Anahuac, TX 77514. Written comments may be 
mailed to the above addresses or submitted via electronic mail to: 
doug_stpierre@fws.gov. You may also access and download copies of the 
draft document at the following website address: https://
southwest.fws.gov/refuges/Plan/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Doug St. Pierre, at 505-248-
6636.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Wildlife System Administration 
Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act 
of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee et seq.) requires a CCP. The purpose in 
developing CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy 
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of 
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles 
of fish and wildlife science, conservation, legal mandates, and Service 
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on 
conserving wildlife and their habitats, the CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including 
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will 
review and update these CCPs at least every 15 years in accordance with 
the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as 
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, 
and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C 4321-
4370d).
    Background: The Texas Chenier Plain National Wildlife Refuge 
Complex contains four refuges: Moody National Wildlife Refuge, Anahuac 
National Wildlife Refuge, McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge, and Texas 
Point National Wildlife Refuge. The refuges are located along the Texas 
Coast,

[[Page 61064]]

between Houston, Texas, and the Louisiana state line in Chambers, 
Jefferson, and Galveston Counties, Texas. All four refuges include the 
Migratory Bird Conservation Act as a primary authority and purpose.
    Moody NWR was established in 1961 and today consists of a 
conservation easement on approximately 3,516 acres of coastal marsh. 
Anahuac NWR was established in 1963 and contains 34,339 acres of 
coastal marsh and adjoining uplands in fee title ownership. McFaddin 
NWR was established in 1980 and is 58,861 acres of primarily coastal 
marsh in a mix of fee title and conservation easements. Texas Point NWR 
was established in 1979 and consists of 8,952 acres of coastal marsh in 
fee title ownership.
    The integrated EIS contains two sets of alternatives addressing two 
separate but related Federal Actions: (1) Refuge management 
alternatives for development of a CCP for the Complex, and (2) 
alternatives for expansion of the refuge acquisition boundaries.
    Five refuge management alternatives are proposed and evaluated for 
the Refuge Complex. The first management alternative is the ``No 
Action'' alternative, required by NEPA, which would continue the 
current refuge management activities. Current habitat management 
activities include (1) water management; (2) wetland, prairie, and 
woodlot restoration; (3) moist soil management units; (4) cooperative 
rice farming; (5) fire management; (6) controlled livestock grazing; 
and (7) exotic/invasive species management. The second management 
alternative emphasizes intensifying management of wetland habitats for 
waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and other wetland-dependent 
migratory birds. The third management alternative emphasizes native 
habitat restoration and addressing threats from coastal land loss, 
altered hydrology, exotic species, and contaminants. The fourth 
management alternative, the Service's preferred alternative, emphasizes 
an integrated management approach combining (1) expanded habitat 
management and restoration programs, (2) new research and wildlife 
population monitoring, and (3) increased efforts to address major 
threats to ecosystem health. The fifth management alternative 
emphasizes a passive management approach. All five of these refuge 
management alternatives make wildlife-dependent recreational 
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for 
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and 
environmental education and interpretation.
    Four refuge boundary expansion alternatives are proposed and 
evaluated. The first expansion alternative is the ``No Action'' 
alternative, required by NEPA, which would retain the current refuge 
acquisition boundaries. The second expansion alternative would expand 
the refuge boundary for Moody NWR by 5,050 acres; for Anahuac NWR by 
20,500 acres; for McFaddin NWR by 7,190 acres; and for Texas Point NWR 
by 850 acres. The total expansion of 33,590 acres continues the 
historic focus on land acquisition primarily in coastal marsh and 
adjacent agricultural uplands. The third expansion alternative, the 
Service's preferred alternative, would expand the refuge boundary for 
Moody NWR by 7,920 acres; for Anahuac NWR by 47,750 acres; for McFaddin 
NWR by 7,190 acres; and for Texas Point NWR by 1,400 acres. The total 
expansion of 64,260 acres includes all of the coastal marsh and 
adjacent agricultural uplands from the second expansion alternative 
plus two important areas of native coastal prairie. The fourth 
expansion alternative would expand the refuge boundary for Moody NWR by 
7,920 acres, for Anahuac NWR by 64,910, for McFaddin NWR by 29,890 
acres, and for Texas Point NWR by 1,400 acres. The total expansion of 
104,120 acres includes all of the lands in the third expansion 
alternative along with a large freshwater marsh north of the current 
McFaddin NWR and a near-coast bottomland hardwood area important to 
neotropical migratory birds. Lands acquired in the future would be 
managed according to the strategies contained in the Service's 
preferred management alternative.
    Public Meetings: The Service will hold at least two public meetings 
in Chambers and Jefferson Counties, Texas, 30 days after publication of 
this notice to present the draft document, answer questions, and 
receive formal public comments. Notice of the meetings will be posted 
in local newspapers and other media outlets and given through special 
mailings to individuals and organizations that have expressed interest 
in this planning effort.

    Editorial note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register October 11, 2006.

    Dated: April 3, 2006.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Acting, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Albuquerque, 
New Mexico.
 [FR Doc. E6-17087 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.