Control of Sodium Permanganate as a List II Chemical, 60823-60827 [E6-16990]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
adding new paragraphs (d) and (e) to
read as follows:
§ 404.1596 Circumstances under which we
may suspend and terminate your benefits
before we make a determination.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) When the suspension is effective.
We will suspend your benefits effective
with the month in which it is
determined in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section that
your disability benefits should stop due
to your failure, without good cause (see
§ 404.911), to comply with our request
for necessary information for your
continuing disability review. This
review is to determine whether or not
you continue to meet the disability
requirements of the law. When we have
received the information, we will
reinstate your benefits for any previous
month for which they are otherwise
payable, and continue with the CDR
process.
(e) When we will terminate your
benefits. We will terminate your
benefits following 12 consecutive
months of benefit suspension because
you did not comply with our request for
information in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. We
will count the 12-month suspension
period from the start of the first month
that you stopped receiving benefits (see
paragraph (d) of this section). This
termination is effective with the start of
the 13th month after the suspension
began because you failed to cooperate.
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart I—[Amended]
4. The authority citation for subpart I
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1611, 1614,
1619, 1631(a), (c), (d)(1) and (p), and 1633 of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5),
1382, 1382c, 1382h, 1383(a), (c), (d)(1), and
(p), and 1383(b); secs. 4(c) and (5), 6(c)–(e),
14(a), and 15, Pub. L. 98–460, 98 Stat. 1794,
1801, 1802, and 1808 (42 U.S.C. 421 note,
423 note and 1382h note).
5. Section 416.992 is added to read as
follows:
I
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
§ 416.992 What happens if you fail to
comply with our request for information.
We will suspend your payments
before we make a determination
regarding your continued eligibility for
disability payments if you fail to
comply, without good cause (see
§ 416.1411), with our request for
information for your continuing
disability review or age-18
redetermination. The suspension is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
02:22 Oct 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
effective with the month in which it is
determined in accordance with
§ 416.1322 that your eligibility for
disability payments has ended due to
your failure to comply with our request
for necessary information. When we
have received the information, we will
reinstate your payments for any
previous month for which they are
otherwise payable, and continue with
the CDR or age-18 redetermination
process. We will terminate your
eligibility for payments following 12
consecutive months of payment
suspension as discussed in § 416.1335.
[FR Doc. E6–17181 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–254F]
RIN 1117–AA90
Control of Sodium Permanganate as a
List II Chemical
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), U.S. Department
of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2005, the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (70 FR 9889) which
proposed the addition of sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical
because of its direct substitutability for
potassium permanganate (a List II
chemical) in the illicit production of
cocaine.
This rulemaking finalizes control of
sodium permanganate. As a List II
chemical, handlers of sodium
permanganate shall be subject to
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
chemical regulatory controls including
recordkeeping, reporting, and import/
export requirements. DEA has
determined that these controls are
necessary to prevent the diversion of
this chemical to cocaine laboratories.
This rulemaking is also establishing a
cumulative threshold of 55 kilograms
and 500 kilograms (respectively) for
domestic and international transactions.
As such, all transactions which meet or
exceed these quantities (in a calendar
month) shall be considered regulated
transactions, subject to recordkeeping,
reporting and/or import/export
notification requirements. Additionally,
as a result of this rulemaking, chemical
mixtures having greater than 15 percent
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60823
sodium permanganate shall be subject to
CSA chemical regulatory control
provisions.
All handlers of the List II chemical
sodium permanganate shall also be
subject to the applicable civil and
criminal penalty provisions found in 21
U.S.C. 841, 842, 843, 959 and 960.
DATES: Effective Date: December 18,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud Ph.D., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537 at (202) 307–
7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CSA
and its implementing regulations,
specifically 21 U.S.C. 802(35) and 21
CFR 1310.02(c), provide the Attorney
General with the authority to specify, by
regulation, additional chemicals as ‘‘List
II’’ chemicals if they are used in the
manufacture of a controlled substance
in violation of the CSA. This authority
has been delegated to the Administrator,
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) by 28 CFR 0.100 and redelegated
to the Deputy Administrator under 28
CFR 0.104 (Subpart R) Appendix section
12.
On March 1, 2005, the DEA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (70 FR
9889) which proposed the addition of
sodium permanganate as a List II
chemical because of its direct
substitutability for potassium
permanganate (a List II chemical) in the
illicit production of cocaine.
Additionally, the Notice of Public Rule
Making (NPRM) proposed that a
threshold of 55 kilograms and 500
kilograms be established (respectively)
for domestic and international
transactions.
DEA also proposed that chemical
mixtures (containing sodium
permanganate) having less than or equal
to 15 percent sodium permanganate
shall qualify for automatic exemption
from CSA chemical regulatory controls
pursuant to 21 CFR Part 1310. Since
DEA recognizes that the concentration
limit exemption criteria cannot identify
all mixtures that should receive
exemption status, DEA has
implemented an application process to
exempt additional mixtures (21 CFR
1310.13). This application process was
finalized in a Final Rule published in
the Federal Register May 1, 2003 (68 FR
23195). Under the application process,
manufacturers may submit an
application for exemption for those
mixtures that do not qualify for
automatic exemption. Exemption status
can be granted if DEA determines that
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
60824
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the mixture is formulated in such a way
that it cannot be easily used in the illicit
production of a controlled substance
and the listed chemical cannot be
readily recovered (i.e., it meets the
conditions in 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(v)).
An application may be for a single or a
multiple number of formulations.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Sodium Permanganate Industry and
Legitimate Uses
Sodium permanganate is an inorganic
oxidant that is a direct substitute for
potassium permanganate. Due to its
high solubility in water, sodium
permanganate has distinct advantages
over potassium permanganate in many
industrial applications. It is becoming
widely used for industrial purposes,
including (1) Printed circuit board
production, (2) pharmaceutical and
chemical synthesis, (3) soil and
groundwater remediation, (4) metal
cleaning formulations, (5) acid mine
drainage and (6) hydrogen sulfide odor
control.
DEA has identified only one domestic
producer of sodium permanganate.
However, sodium permanganate is also
imported into the United States (U.S.)
and there are at least three other major
suppliers of sodium permanganate in
the U.S.
The U.S. firm that manufactures
sodium permanganate distributes it
through 15–20 major authorized
distributors and more than 100 branch
distributors. This U.S. supplier has
advised DEA that it is aware of ‘‘one
[sodium permanganate] manufacturer in
Germany, more than one manufacturer
in China and at least nine suppliers in
other countries.’’
Reason for This Control Action
Sodium permanganate is directly
substitutable for potassium
permanganate, an important List II
chemical used illicitly in the production
of cocaine. Potassium permanganate is
widely used as an oxidizing agent for
removing impurities from coca base in
the illicit production of cocaine.
Potassium permanganate is utilized
because it produces an aesthetically
pleasing, white, crystalline form of
cocaine hydrochloride, which is easily
marketed.
Because of its importance in cocaine
production, potassium permanganate
has been the target of international
cooperative efforts to monitor potassium
permanganate shipments and prevent its
diversion. This effort remains an
international priority involving the
competent authorities of 22 countries.
Recently, the world’s largest producer
of potassium permanganate (a U.S.
company) informed DEA of its recent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
02:22 Oct 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
conversion of production processes
away from potassium permanganate and
toward the increased production and
distribution of sodium permanganate.
Because of sodium permanganate’s
direct substitutability for potassium
permanganate, this company has agreed
with DEA concerns regarding the
potential illicit use of sodium
permanganate as a direct substitute for
potassium permanganate in cocaine
processing. This producer advised DEA
that it would welcome the control of
sodium permanganate as a listed
chemical.
Even though production of sodium
permanganate has historically been
limited, sodium permanganate has been
seized by law enforcement at illicit
cocaine laboratories in Latin America.
As reported in the 2001 and 2002
Statistical Summary on Drugs, compiled
by the Organization of American States
(OAS), and the Inter-American Drug
Abuse Control Commission (CICAD),
the Government of Colombia (as
reported by the Colombian Ministerio
de Justicia y del Derecho, Direccion
Nacional de Estupefacientes) reported
the seizure of 1,400 kilograms of sodium
permanganate in 1997, 236 kilograms in
1998 and 404 kilograms in 1999.
Because of its direct substitutability
for potassium permanganate and
increased production, DEA sees the
urgent need to regulate sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical to
prevent its diversion to cocaine
laboratories. Hence, this rulemaking
subjects sodium permanganate to the
same CSA regulatory controls which
have been put forth for potassium
permanganate. As such, sodium
permanganate shall be subject to List II
chemical controls, including
recordkeeping, reporting, and import/
export requirements as specified in 21
CFR Parts 1310 and 1313.
Comments Received in Response to the
NPRM
In response to the March 1, 2005,
NPRM, DEA received four comments.
One commenter simply stated that they
supported the control of sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical.
Another commenter stated that they
disagreed with the exemption of
chemical mixtures containing less than
15 percent sodium permanganate, but
did not provide any supportive reason
for their opposition.
Two comments addressed the issue of
the establishment of a domestic
threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic
transactions. One commenter stated that
the threshold was too high and instead
suggested that DEA establish a domestic
threshold of 5 kilograms. Another
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commenter stated that they believed the
55 kilogram threshold was too low, and
stated that they believed it would
increase the recordkeeping burden on
wastewater treatment facilities.
DEA believes, however, that the
threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic
transactions will not impact these
wastewater treatment facilities because
these facilities are end-users. As such,
they are not required to maintain
records and therefore do not incur any
regulatory burden. Their suppliers,
however, must maintain records of all
distributions greater than 55 kilograms.
Furthermore, DEA believes that the 55
kilogram threshold for domestic
transactions is appropriate, since this is
the threshold that currently exists for
potassium permanganate (which is the
direct substitute for sodium
permanganate in these industries.)
One comment was received from the
sole U.S. producer of sodium
permanganate. The company stated that
it supports DEA’s proposal to control
sodium permanganate as a List II
chemical. The company further stated
that controls on sodium permanganate
should be exactly the same as the
controls which currently exist on
potassium permanganate. DEA agrees.
What This Final Rule Does and
Regulatory Controls That Shall Apply
to This Chemical
After careful consideration of all
comments, DEA has determined that all
control provisions as proposed in the
March 1, 2005, NPRM (70 FR 9889)
shall become final. As such, the exact
regulatory controls which currently
apply to potassium permanganate shall
be implemented for sodium
permanganate effective December 18,
2006.
As a List II chemical, sodium
permanganate shall be subject to the
chemical regulatory control provisions
and civil and criminal sanctions of the
CSA. As such, recordkeeping, reporting
and import/export notification
requirements (as described in 21 CFR
Parts 1310 and 1313) shall apply. As a
List II chemical, manufacturers,
distributors, importers and exporters of
sodium permanganate will not be
required to register with DEA pursuant
to the provisions of 21 CFR Part 1309.
Handlers of this chemical shall be
required to maintain records and meet
CSA import/export notification
requirements for ‘‘regulated
transactions’’ involving sodium
permanganate. The CSA (21 U.S.C.
802(39)) defines the term ‘‘regulated
transaction’’ as a ‘‘distribution, receipt,
sale, importation, or exportation of, or
an international transaction involving
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
the shipment of, a listed chemical, or if
the Attorney General establishes a
threshold amount for a specific listed
chemical,’’ a transaction involving a
threshold amount. The CSA, therefore,
provides the Attorney General with
authority to establish a threshold
amount for listed chemicals if the
Attorney General so elects.
DEA is establishing a threshold of 55
kilograms for domestic transactions and
500 kilograms for international
transactions. Consequently, all
transactions which meet or exceed these
threshold quantities shall be considered
regulated transactions and be subject to
recordkeeping, reporting and import/
export notification requirements of the
CSA.
Regulatory Requirements for Persons
Handling Regulated Transactions of
Sodium Permanganate
Records and Reports. The CSA (21
U.S.C. 830) requires certain records to
be kept and reports to be made
involving listed chemicals. Regulations
describing recordkeeping and reporting
requirements are set forth in 21 CFR
Part 1310. A record must be made and
maintained for two years after the date
of a regulated transaction involving a
List II chemical. Only a distribution,
receipt, sale, importation, or exportation
of a regulated mixture at or above the
established threshold (e.g. 55 kilograms
for domestic transactions and 500
kilograms for international transactions)
is a regulated transaction (21 CFR
1300.02(b)(28)).
Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a
regulated mixture shall submit
manufacturing, inventory and use data
on an annual basis (21 CFR 1310.05(d)).
Bulk manufacturers producing the
mixture solely for internal consumption,
e.g., formulating a non-regulated
mixture, are not required to submit this
information. Existing standard industry
reports containing the required
information are acceptable, provided the
information is readily retrievable from
the report.
21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each
regulated person shall report to DEA
any regulated transaction involving an
extraordinary quantity, an uncommon
method of payment or delivery, or any
other circumstance that causes the
regulated person to believe that the
listed chemical will be used in violation
of the CSA.
Imports/Exports. All import/exports
and brokered transactions of regulated
mixtures shall comply with the CSA (21
U.S.C. 957 and 971). Regulations for
importation and exportation of listed
chemicals are described in 21 CFR Part
1313.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
02:22 Oct 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
Administrative Inspection. Places,
including factories, warehouses, or
other establishments and conveyances,
where regulated persons may lawfully
hold, manufacture, or distribute,
dispense, administer, or otherwise
dispose of a listed chemical or where
records relating to those activities are
maintained, are controlled premises as
defined in 21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA
(21 U.S.C. 880) allows for administrative
inspections of these controlled premises
as provided in 21 CFR Part 1316,
Subpart A.
Specific Requirements That Will Apply
to Regulated Chemical Mixtures
Containing Sodium Permanganate
Effective December 18, 2006, a
chemical mixture that is regulated
because it contains greater than 15
percent sodium permanganate will be
treated as a List II chemical.
Transactions that meet or exceed the
cumulative monthly threshold of 55
kilograms for domestic transactions and
500 kilograms for international
transactions shall be regulated
transactions.
The regulatory requirements for
regulated chemical mixtures containing
List II chemicals are the same as for
regulated chemical mixtures containing
List I chemicals, except that registration
requirements do not apply. Therefore,
the same requirements for records and
reports, imports/exports (except that
pertaining to 21 U.S.C. 957), and
administrative inspection, as outlined
above, apply to handlers of List II
regulated chemical mixtures.
Persons who submit an application
for exemption (21 CFR 1310.13) and
whose application is pending or
subsequently denied by DEA shall be
required to comply with all chemical
control requirements, including
recordkeeping and reporting, effective
December 18, 2006. Therefore, all
transactions of the chemical mixture
would be regulated, if above threshold,
while an application for exemption is
pending or awaiting correction. This is
necessary because not regulating these
transactions could result in increased
diversion of chemicals desirable to
cocaine traffickers.
Potential Impact of Regulation Upon
Industry
In an effort to better estimate the
potential impact of this action, DEA
conducted an analysis of various data
sources relating to the manufacture,
distribution, and use of the
permanganates. This included an
analysis of current chemical producers
and marketing directories (to identify
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60825
companies listing themselves as sources
of these chemicals).
As previously stated in the NPRM, the
DEA has identified only a limited
number of companies which distribute
sodium permanganate which has been
either domestically produced or
imported. While sodium permanganate
has industrial uses, DEA has not been
able to identify any ‘household’ uses for
this chemical. Therefore, the number of
firms that are likely to be affected by
this proposed regulation is relatively
small.
This final rulemaking is not
considered to have an impact upon a
substantial number of firms, given the
limited distribution of this chemical.
Additionally, it is likely that the CSA
recordkeeping requirements are already
being met as part of normal business
practice. Since sodium permanganate is
being added as a List II chemical there
is no registration requirement.
Additionally, DEA is establishing a
cumulative threshold of 55 kilograms
for domestic transactions and 500
kilograms for international transactions.
Therefore, small transactions involving
research quantities of sodium
permanganate will not be subject to
regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator hereby
certifies that this rulemaking has been
drafted in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), has reviewed this regulation,
and by approving it certifies that this
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As noted
previously, this rulemaking is not
considered to have an impact upon a
substantial number of firms, given the
limited distribution of this chemical.
Further, this impact is being limited by
the fact that DEA is adding sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical,
rather than the more stringent
requirements of a List I chemical.
Additionally, it is likely that the CSA
recordkeeping requirements are already
being met as part of normal business
practice. The cumulative threshold of 55
kilograms for domestic transactions and
500 kilograms for international
transactions established here would
remove from regulatory control small
transactions involving research
quantities of sodium permanganate.
Executive Order 12866
The Deputy Administrator further
certifies that this rulemaking has been
drafted in accordance with the
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
60826
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
principles in Executive Order 12866
section 1(b). It has been determined that
this is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’.
Therefore, this action has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget. DEA has identified only one
U.S. firm which manufactures sodium
permanganate. This firm supports
control of sodium permanganate as a
List II chemical.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking adds sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical
under the CSA. As a List II chemical,
there is no requirement of registration to
handle this chemical. Further, as most
persons who handle this product are
end-users and, as such, are not required
to maintain records or file reports, there
is no impact on these persons.
Handlers of sodium permanganate
that distribute above threshold
quantities are required to maintain
records. Normal business records are
deemed adequate if they contain the
information required in 21 CFR 1310.06.
As normal business records meet DEA’s
regulatory requirements, the
maintenance of these records does not
fall under the parameters of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. Further,
persons importing and exporting this
List II chemical in quantities of greater
than 500 kilograms, cumulatively, per
month, must provide DEA with advance
notification of these transactions. As
DEA does not have any information on
which to base an estimate of the impact
of this new reporting requirement for
persons importing or exporting sodium
permanganate in quantities greater than
500 kilograms, cumulatively, per month,
DEA will adjust the burden related to
this information collection (OMB
control number 1117–0023 ‘‘Import/
Export Declaration: Precursor and
Essential Chemicals’’) upon its renewal.
Executive Order 12988
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil
Justice Reform.
Drug Traffic Control, List I and List II
chemicals, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements.
I For reasons set out above, 21 CFR part
1310 is amended as follows:
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of State law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any State; nor does it
diminish the power of any State to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $115,000,000 or more
in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $114,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
PART 1310—RECORDS AND
REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS
AND CERTAIN MACHINES
1. The authority citation for part 1310
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 871(b), 890.
2. § 1310.02 is amended by adding a
new paragraph (b)(12) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1310.02
Substances Covered.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(12) Sodium Permanganate 6588
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. § 1310.04 is amended by adding
new paragraphs (f)(2)(i)(H) and
(f)(2)(ii)((J) to read as follows:
§ 1310.04
Maintenance of records.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(H) Sodium permanganate ......... N/A
............. 500 kilograms
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(J) Sodium permanganate .............
N/A ............. 55 kilograms
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. § 1310.12 is amended by adding an
entry for ‘‘sodium permanganate’’ to the
table in paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1310.12
*
Exempt chemical mixtures.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE OF CONCENTRATION LIMITS
DEA chemical
code No.
*
List II Chemicals.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sodium Permanganate ..................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
02:22 Oct 17, 2006
*
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Concentration
(percent)
*
*
*
*
15% by Weight.
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
6588
Special
conditions
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
60827
heading ‘‘Special Analyses’’, sixth line
from the top of the column, the language
‘‘and because the regulation does not’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘and because the
regulations do not’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurence K. Williams, 202–622–3600
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I Par. 3. The authority citation for part
1 continues to read in part as follows:
This document contains amendments
to the Regulations on Procedure and
Administration (26 CFR part 301)
relating to the provision of notice under
section 6330 of the Internal Revenue
Code to taxpayers of a right to a CDP
hearing (CDP Notice) before or, in
limited cases, after levy. Final
regulations (TD 8980) were published
on January 18, 2002, in the Federal
Register (67 FR 2549) (the 2002 final
regulations). The 2002 final regulations
implemented certain changes made by
section 3401 of the Internal Revenue
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998 (Pub. L. 105–206, 112 Stat.
685)(RRA 1998), including the addition
of section 6330 to the Internal Revenue
Code.
Section 3401 of RRA 1998 also added
section 6320 to the Internal Revenue
Code. That statute provides for notice to
taxpayers of a right to a hearing after the
filing of a notice of Federal tax lien
(NFTL). A number of the provisions in
section 6330 concerning the conduct
and judicial review of a CDP hearing are
incorporated by reference in section
6320. On January 18, 2002, final
regulations (TD 8979) under section
6320 were published in the Federal
Register (67 FR 2558) along with the
2002 final regulations under section
6330.
On September 16, 2005, the IRS and
the Treasury Department published in
the Federal Register (70 FR 54687) a
notice of proposed rulemaking and
notice of public hearing (REG–150091–
02). The IRS received one set of written
comments responding to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. Because no one
requested to speak at the public hearing,
the hearing was cancelled. After
considering each of the comments, the
proposed regulations are adopted as
amended by this Treasury decision.
On August 17, 2006, the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, Public Law 109–
280, 120 Stat. 780 (the PPA), was
enacted. Section 855 of the PPA
amended section 6330(d) of the Internal
Revenue Code to withdraw judicial
review of CDP notices of determination
from United States district court
jurisdiction, leaving review solely in the
United States Tax Court. This
amendment to section 6330(d), effective
for notices of determination issued on or
after October 17, 2006, requires the
removal of references to district court
review in the 2002 final regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 29, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–16990 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
Internal Revenue Service
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 4. Section 301.6103(k)(6)–1(e) is
revised to read as follows:
I
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9274]
RIN 1545–BB16
Disclosure of Return Information by
Certain Officers and Employees for
Investigative Purposes; Correction
§ 301.6103(k)(6)–1 Disclosure of return
information by certain officers and
employees for investigative purposes.
*
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects final
regulations (TD 9274) that were
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, July 11, 2006 (71 FR 38985).
The document contains final regulations
relating to the disclosure of return
information pursuant to section
6103(k)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.
DATES: This correcting amendment is
effective October 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Helene R. Newsome, (202) 622–4570
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of final regulations (TD
9274) that is the subject of these
corrections is under section 6103(k)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, TD 9274 contains errors
that may prove to be misleading and are
in need of clarification.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 301 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
I Paragraph 1. On page 38985, column
1, in the preamble, under the caption
‘‘DATES’’, second line, the language
‘‘are effective July 11, 2006.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘are effective July 6,
2006.’’.
I Par. 2. On page 38986, column 2, in
the preamble, under the paragraph
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
02:22 Oct 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
(e) Effective date. This section is
applicable on July 6, 2006.
Guy R. Traynor,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division,Associate Chief
Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E6–17135 Filed 10–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9291]
RIN 1545–BB97
Miscellaneous Changes to Collection
Due Process Procedures Relating to
Notice and Opportunity for Hearing
Prior to Levy
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final Regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations amending the regulations
relating to a taxpayer’s right to a hearing
before or, in limited cases, after levy
under section 6330 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. The final
regulations make certain clarifying
changes in the way collection due
process (CDP) hearings are held and
specify the period during which a
taxpayer may request an equivalent
hearing. The final regulations affect
taxpayers against whose property or
rights to property the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) intends to levy.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on November 16, 2006.
Applicability Date: These regulations
apply to requests for CDP or equivalent
hearings on or after November 16, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Background
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 17, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60823-60827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16990]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA-254F]
RIN 1117-AA90
Control of Sodium Permanganate as a List II Chemical
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), U.S. Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2005, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (70 FR 9889) which proposed
the addition of sodium permanganate as a List II chemical because of
its direct substitutability for potassium permanganate (a List II
chemical) in the illicit production of cocaine.
This rulemaking finalizes control of sodium permanganate. As a List
II chemical, handlers of sodium permanganate shall be subject to
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) chemical regulatory controls including
recordkeeping, reporting, and import/export requirements. DEA has
determined that these controls are necessary to prevent the diversion
of this chemical to cocaine laboratories.
This rulemaking is also establishing a cumulative threshold of 55
kilograms and 500 kilograms (respectively) for domestic and
international transactions. As such, all transactions which meet or
exceed these quantities (in a calendar month) shall be considered
regulated transactions, subject to recordkeeping, reporting and/or
import/export notification requirements. Additionally, as a result of
this rulemaking, chemical mixtures having greater than 15 percent
sodium permanganate shall be subject to CSA chemical regulatory control
provisions.
All handlers of the List II chemical sodium permanganate shall also
be subject to the applicable civil and criminal penalty provisions
found in 21 U.S.C. 841, 842, 843, 959 and 960.
DATES: Effective Date: December 18, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud Ph.D., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC 20537 at (202) 307-7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CSA and its implementing regulations,
specifically 21 U.S.C. 802(35) and 21 CFR 1310.02(c), provide the
Attorney General with the authority to specify, by regulation,
additional chemicals as ``List II'' chemicals if they are used in the
manufacture of a controlled substance in violation of the CSA. This
authority has been delegated to the Administrator, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) by 28 CFR 0.100 and redelegated to the Deputy
Administrator under 28 CFR 0.104 (Subpart R) Appendix section 12.
On March 1, 2005, the DEA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(70 FR 9889) which proposed the addition of sodium permanganate as a
List II chemical because of its direct substitutability for potassium
permanganate (a List II chemical) in the illicit production of cocaine.
Additionally, the Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM) proposed that a
threshold of 55 kilograms and 500 kilograms be established
(respectively) for domestic and international transactions.
DEA also proposed that chemical mixtures (containing sodium
permanganate) having less than or equal to 15 percent sodium
permanganate shall qualify for automatic exemption from CSA chemical
regulatory controls pursuant to 21 CFR Part 1310. Since DEA recognizes
that the concentration limit exemption criteria cannot identify all
mixtures that should receive exemption status, DEA has implemented an
application process to exempt additional mixtures (21 CFR 1310.13).
This application process was finalized in a Final Rule published in the
Federal Register May 1, 2003 (68 FR 23195). Under the application
process, manufacturers may submit an application for exemption for
those mixtures that do not qualify for automatic exemption. Exemption
status can be granted if DEA determines that
[[Page 60824]]
the mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used
in the illicit production of a controlled substance and the listed
chemical cannot be readily recovered (i.e., it meets the conditions in
21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(v)). An application may be for a single or a
multiple number of formulations.
Sodium Permanganate Industry and Legitimate Uses
Sodium permanganate is an inorganic oxidant that is a direct
substitute for potassium permanganate. Due to its high solubility in
water, sodium permanganate has distinct advantages over potassium
permanganate in many industrial applications. It is becoming widely
used for industrial purposes, including (1) Printed circuit board
production, (2) pharmaceutical and chemical synthesis, (3) soil and
groundwater remediation, (4) metal cleaning formulations, (5) acid mine
drainage and (6) hydrogen sulfide odor control.
DEA has identified only one domestic producer of sodium
permanganate. However, sodium permanganate is also imported into the
United States (U.S.) and there are at least three other major suppliers
of sodium permanganate in the U.S.
The U.S. firm that manufactures sodium permanganate distributes it
through 15-20 major authorized distributors and more than 100 branch
distributors. This U.S. supplier has advised DEA that it is aware of
``one [sodium permanganate] manufacturer in Germany, more than one
manufacturer in China and at least nine suppliers in other countries.''
Reason for This Control Action
Sodium permanganate is directly substitutable for potassium
permanganate, an important List II chemical used illicitly in the
production of cocaine. Potassium permanganate is widely used as an
oxidizing agent for removing impurities from coca base in the illicit
production of cocaine. Potassium permanganate is utilized because it
produces an aesthetically pleasing, white, crystalline form of cocaine
hydrochloride, which is easily marketed.
Because of its importance in cocaine production, potassium
permanganate has been the target of international cooperative efforts
to monitor potassium permanganate shipments and prevent its diversion.
This effort remains an international priority involving the competent
authorities of 22 countries.
Recently, the world's largest producer of potassium permanganate (a
U.S. company) informed DEA of its recent conversion of production
processes away from potassium permanganate and toward the increased
production and distribution of sodium permanganate. Because of sodium
permanganate's direct substitutability for potassium permanganate, this
company has agreed with DEA concerns regarding the potential illicit
use of sodium permanganate as a direct substitute for potassium
permanganate in cocaine processing. This producer advised DEA that it
would welcome the control of sodium permanganate as a listed chemical.
Even though production of sodium permanganate has historically been
limited, sodium permanganate has been seized by law enforcement at
illicit cocaine laboratories in Latin America. As reported in the 2001
and 2002 Statistical Summary on Drugs, compiled by the Organization of
American States (OAS), and the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control
Commission (CICAD), the Government of Colombia (as reported by the
Colombian Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho, Direccion Nacional de
Estupefacientes) reported the seizure of 1,400 kilograms of sodium
permanganate in 1997, 236 kilograms in 1998 and 404 kilograms in 1999.
Because of its direct substitutability for potassium permanganate
and increased production, DEA sees the urgent need to regulate sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical to prevent its diversion to cocaine
laboratories. Hence, this rulemaking subjects sodium permanganate to
the same CSA regulatory controls which have been put forth for
potassium permanganate. As such, sodium permanganate shall be subject
to List II chemical controls, including recordkeeping, reporting, and
import/export requirements as specified in 21 CFR Parts 1310 and 1313.
Comments Received in Response to the NPRM
In response to the March 1, 2005, NPRM, DEA received four comments.
One commenter simply stated that they supported the control of sodium
permanganate as a List II chemical.
Another commenter stated that they disagreed with the exemption of
chemical mixtures containing less than 15 percent sodium permanganate,
but did not provide any supportive reason for their opposition.
Two comments addressed the issue of the establishment of a domestic
threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic transactions. One commenter
stated that the threshold was too high and instead suggested that DEA
establish a domestic threshold of 5 kilograms. Another commenter stated
that they believed the 55 kilogram threshold was too low, and stated
that they believed it would increase the recordkeeping burden on
wastewater treatment facilities.
DEA believes, however, that the threshold of 55 kilograms for
domestic transactions will not impact these wastewater treatment
facilities because these facilities are end-users. As such, they are
not required to maintain records and therefore do not incur any
regulatory burden. Their suppliers, however, must maintain records of
all distributions greater than 55 kilograms.
Furthermore, DEA believes that the 55 kilogram threshold for
domestic transactions is appropriate, since this is the threshold that
currently exists for potassium permanganate (which is the direct
substitute for sodium permanganate in these industries.)
One comment was received from the sole U.S. producer of sodium
permanganate. The company stated that it supports DEA's proposal to
control sodium permanganate as a List II chemical. The company further
stated that controls on sodium permanganate should be exactly the same
as the controls which currently exist on potassium permanganate. DEA
agrees.
What This Final Rule Does and Regulatory Controls That Shall Apply to
This Chemical
After careful consideration of all comments, DEA has determined
that all control provisions as proposed in the March 1, 2005, NPRM (70
FR 9889) shall become final. As such, the exact regulatory controls
which currently apply to potassium permanganate shall be implemented
for sodium permanganate effective December 18, 2006.
As a List II chemical, sodium permanganate shall be subject to the
chemical regulatory control provisions and civil and criminal sanctions
of the CSA. As such, recordkeeping, reporting and import/export
notification requirements (as described in 21 CFR Parts 1310 and 1313)
shall apply. As a List II chemical, manufacturers, distributors,
importers and exporters of sodium permanganate will not be required to
register with DEA pursuant to the provisions of 21 CFR Part 1309.
Handlers of this chemical shall be required to maintain records and
meet CSA import/export notification requirements for ``regulated
transactions'' involving sodium permanganate. The CSA (21 U.S.C.
802(39)) defines the term ``regulated transaction'' as a
``distribution, receipt, sale, importation, or exportation of, or an
international transaction involving
[[Page 60825]]
the shipment of, a listed chemical, or if the Attorney General
establishes a threshold amount for a specific listed chemical,'' a
transaction involving a threshold amount. The CSA, therefore, provides
the Attorney General with authority to establish a threshold amount for
listed chemicals if the Attorney General so elects.
DEA is establishing a threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic
transactions and 500 kilograms for international transactions.
Consequently, all transactions which meet or exceed these threshold
quantities shall be considered regulated transactions and be subject to
recordkeeping, reporting and import/export notification requirements of
the CSA.
Regulatory Requirements for Persons Handling Regulated Transactions of
Sodium Permanganate
Records and Reports. The CSA (21 U.S.C. 830) requires certain
records to be kept and reports to be made involving listed chemicals.
Regulations describing recordkeeping and reporting requirements are set
forth in 21 CFR Part 1310. A record must be made and maintained for two
years after the date of a regulated transaction involving a List II
chemical. Only a distribution, receipt, sale, importation, or
exportation of a regulated mixture at or above the established
threshold (e.g. 55 kilograms for domestic transactions and 500
kilograms for international transactions) is a regulated transaction
(21 CFR 1300.02(b)(28)).
Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a regulated mixture shall
submit manufacturing, inventory and use data on an annual basis (21 CFR
1310.05(d)). Bulk manufacturers producing the mixture solely for
internal consumption, e.g., formulating a non-regulated mixture, are
not required to submit this information. Existing standard industry
reports containing the required information are acceptable, provided
the information is readily retrievable from the report.
21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each regulated person shall report to
DEA any regulated transaction involving an extraordinary quantity, an
uncommon method of payment or delivery, or any other circumstance that
causes the regulated person to believe that the listed chemical will be
used in violation of the CSA.
Imports/Exports. All import/exports and brokered transactions of
regulated mixtures shall comply with the CSA (21 U.S.C. 957 and 971).
Regulations for importation and exportation of listed chemicals are
described in 21 CFR Part 1313.
Administrative Inspection. Places, including factories, warehouses,
or other establishments and conveyances, where regulated persons may
lawfully hold, manufacture, or distribute, dispense, administer, or
otherwise dispose of a listed chemical or where records relating to
those activities are maintained, are controlled premises as defined in
21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA (21 U.S.C. 880) allows for administrative
inspections of these controlled premises as provided in 21 CFR Part
1316, Subpart A.
Specific Requirements That Will Apply to Regulated Chemical Mixtures
Containing Sodium Permanganate
Effective December 18, 2006, a chemical mixture that is regulated
because it contains greater than 15 percent sodium permanganate will be
treated as a List II chemical. Transactions that meet or exceed the
cumulative monthly threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic transactions
and 500 kilograms for international transactions shall be regulated
transactions.
The regulatory requirements for regulated chemical mixtures
containing List II chemicals are the same as for regulated chemical
mixtures containing List I chemicals, except that registration
requirements do not apply. Therefore, the same requirements for records
and reports, imports/exports (except that pertaining to 21 U.S.C. 957),
and administrative inspection, as outlined above, apply to handlers of
List II regulated chemical mixtures.
Persons who submit an application for exemption (21 CFR 1310.13)
and whose application is pending or subsequently denied by DEA shall be
required to comply with all chemical control requirements, including
recordkeeping and reporting, effective December 18, 2006. Therefore,
all transactions of the chemical mixture would be regulated, if above
threshold, while an application for exemption is pending or awaiting
correction. This is necessary because not regulating these transactions
could result in increased diversion of chemicals desirable to cocaine
traffickers.
Potential Impact of Regulation Upon Industry
In an effort to better estimate the potential impact of this
action, DEA conducted an analysis of various data sources relating to
the manufacture, distribution, and use of the permanganates. This
included an analysis of current chemical producers and marketing
directories (to identify companies listing themselves as sources of
these chemicals).
As previously stated in the NPRM, the DEA has identified only a
limited number of companies which distribute sodium permanganate which
has been either domestically produced or imported. While sodium
permanganate has industrial uses, DEA has not been able to identify any
`household' uses for this chemical. Therefore, the number of firms that
are likely to be affected by this proposed regulation is relatively
small.
This final rulemaking is not considered to have an impact upon a
substantial number of firms, given the limited distribution of this
chemical. Additionally, it is likely that the CSA recordkeeping
requirements are already being met as part of normal business practice.
Since sodium permanganate is being added as a List II chemical there is
no registration requirement. Additionally, DEA is establishing a
cumulative threshold of 55 kilograms for domestic transactions and 500
kilograms for international transactions. Therefore, small transactions
involving research quantities of sodium permanganate will not be
subject to regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this rulemaking has
been drafted in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation, and by approving it
certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. As noted previously,
this rulemaking is not considered to have an impact upon a substantial
number of firms, given the limited distribution of this chemical.
Further, this impact is being limited by the fact that DEA is adding
sodium permanganate as a List II chemical, rather than the more
stringent requirements of a List I chemical. Additionally, it is likely
that the CSA recordkeeping requirements are already being met as part
of normal business practice. The cumulative threshold of 55 kilograms
for domestic transactions and 500 kilograms for international
transactions established here would remove from regulatory control
small transactions involving research quantities of sodium
permanganate.
Executive Order 12866
The Deputy Administrator further certifies that this rulemaking has
been drafted in accordance with the
[[Page 60826]]
principles in Executive Order 12866 section 1(b). It has been
determined that this is a ``significant regulatory action''. Therefore,
this action has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
DEA has identified only one U.S. firm which manufactures sodium
permanganate. This firm supports control of sodium permanganate as a
List II chemical.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking adds sodium permanganate as a List II chemical
under the CSA. As a List II chemical, there is no requirement of
registration to handle this chemical. Further, as most persons who
handle this product are end-users and, as such, are not required to
maintain records or file reports, there is no impact on these persons.
Handlers of sodium permanganate that distribute above threshold
quantities are required to maintain records. Normal business records
are deemed adequate if they contain the information required in 21 CFR
1310.06. As normal business records meet DEA's regulatory requirements,
the maintenance of these records does not fall under the parameters of
the Paperwork Reduction Act. Further, persons importing and exporting
this List II chemical in quantities of greater than 500 kilograms,
cumulatively, per month, must provide DEA with advance notification of
these transactions. As DEA does not have any information on which to
base an estimate of the impact of this new reporting requirement for
persons importing or exporting sodium permanganate in quantities
greater than 500 kilograms, cumulatively, per month, DEA will adjust
the burden related to this information collection (OMB control number
1117-0023 ``Import/Export Declaration: Precursor and Essential
Chemicals'') upon its renewal.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of State
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any State; nor
does it diminish the power of any State to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$115,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $114,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310
Drug Traffic Control, List I and List II chemicals, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements.
0
For reasons set out above, 21 CFR part 1310 is amended as follows:
PART 1310--RECORDS AND REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS AND CERTAIN
MACHINES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1310 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 871(b), 890.
0
2. Sec. 1310.02 is amended by adding a new paragraph (b)(12) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1310.02 Substances Covered.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(12) Sodium Permanganate 6588
* * * * *
0
3. Sec. 1310.04 is amended by adding new paragraphs (f)(2)(i)(H) and
(f)(2)(ii)((J) to read as follows:
Sec. 1310.04 Maintenance of records.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(H) Sodium permanganate ......... N/A ............. 500 kilograms
* * * * *
(ii) * * *
(J) Sodium permanganate ............. N/A ............. 55
kilograms
* * * * *
0
4. Sec. 1310.12 is amended by adding an entry for ``sodium
permanganate'' to the table in paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1310.12 Exempt chemical mixtures.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table of Concentration Limits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEA chemical
code No. Concentration (percent) Special conditions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
List II Chemicals.......................
* * * * * * *
Sodium Permanganate..................... 6588 15% by Weight..............
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60827]]
* * * * *
Dated: September 29, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-16990 Filed 10-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P