Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers; Correction, 60662-60663 [E6-16998]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of September, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Acting Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. E6–17079 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket No. EE–TP–98–550]
RIN 1904–AA85
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedures for Distribution
Transformers; Correction
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical corrections.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE or the Department) published a
final rule on April 27, 2006, amending
Part 431 to prescribe test procedures
and other provisions for distribution
transformers, pursuant to sections
323(b)(10) and 346(a) of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(10) and
6317(a)) This document corrects three
typographical errors in the final rule.
DATES: This correction is effective
October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Antonio Bouza, U.S. Department of
Energy, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202) 586–
4563, e-mail: antonio.bouza@ee.doe.gov.
Francine Pinto, Esq., U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of General Counsel,
GC–72, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202)
586–9507, e-mail:
Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov.
SUMMARY:
The final
rule that is the subject of this correction
document established (1) Test
procedures for measuring the energy
efficiency of distribution transformers,
(2) definitions to delineate the products
covered by the test procedures, (3)
provisions manufacturers must use to
implement the test procedures, (4)
calculation methods for determining the
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
efficiency of distribution transformers,
and (5) enforcement provisions for this
equipment. 71 FR 24971 (April 27,
2006).
the second power, so the corrected
equation reads as follows:
2
P
Plc = Plc 2 os = Plc 2 L2
Por
Need for Corrections
As published in the final rule, the
definition for the term ‘‘excitation
current’’ which can also be referred to
as ‘‘no-load current’’ contains a
typographical error that may prove to be
misleading, and needs to be corrected.
In the final rule, the conjunction ‘‘or’’
appearing between the terms ‘‘excitation
current’’ and ‘‘no-load current’’ was
italicized, such that the two terms
excitation current and no-load current
appeared as one continuous phrase (i.e.,
excitation current or no-load current).
The Department is concerned that the
italicization of the word ‘‘or’’ may lead
to confusion about the defined term.
This technical correction document
removes the italicization of the word
‘‘or.’’ The remainder of the definition
(i.e., ‘‘means the current that flows in
any winding used to excite the
transformer when all other windings are
open-circuited’’) was correct in the final
rule and is not amended by this
technical correction.
In a comment submitted after the
publication of the final rule, NEMA
brought to the Department’s attention
two typographical errors that have an
impact on the calculation of distribution
transformer efficiency and must be
corrected. (NEMA, No. 61 at p. 1) In the
final rule notice, Equation 5–1 was
given as:
P
Plc = Plc 2 os = Plc 2 L2
Por
And an explanation of one of the terms
in equation 5–1, Pos, was given as
follows:
Pos is the specified energy efficiency
load level, where, Pos = PorL2, and
NEMA determined that there are
typographical errors in both equation 5–
1 and the explanation of the term Pos.
The Department carefully reviewed this
comment, and agrees with NEMA’s
determination. In equation 5–1, the
quantity contained in the square
brackets should be squared (i.e., raised
to the second power). In the explanation
of the term Pos, the variable represented
by the letter ‘‘L’’ should not be squared.
These errors were present in the
Department’s previous supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
test procedure (69 FR 45532), but were
not identified at that time.
Today’s technical correction
document amends equation 5–1, raising
the contents of the square brackets to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Similarly, this technical correction
document amends the explanation of
the term Pos to remove the square from
the variable L, so the corrected equation
reads as follows:
Pos is the specified energy efficiency
load level, where Pos = PorL, and
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 431
Administrative practice and
procedure, Distribution transformers,
Energy conservation.
Accordingly, 10 CFR part 431 is
amended by making the following
technical corrections:
I
PART 431—ENERGY EFFICIENCY
PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
EQUIPMENT
1. The authority citation for part 431
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6317.
2. In § 431.192, revise the definition of
‘‘excitation current’’ to read as follows:
I
§ 431.192
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Excitation current or no-load current
means the current that flows in any
winding used to excite the transformer
when all other windings are opencircuited.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In section 5.1 of Appendix A to
Subpart K of Part 431, revise equation
5–1 and the explanation for the term Pos
to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart K of Part 431—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Distribution
Transformers
*
5.1
*
*
*
*
Output Loading Level Adjustment.
*
*
*
*
*
2
P
Plc = Plc 2 os = Plc 2 L2
Por
(5-1)
Where:
*
*
*
*
*
Pos is the specified energy efficiency load
level, where Pos = PorL, and
*
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
*
*
16OCR1
*
*
ER16OC06.011</MATH>
Model Number: HI–STORM 100.
*
*
*
*
ER16OC06.010</MATH>
*
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ER16OC06.009</MATH>
60662
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2,
2006.
Alexander A. Karsner,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. E6–16998 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 433
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
[CMS–2231–F]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIN 0938–A031
Federal Aviation Administration
Medicaid Program; State Allotments
for Payment of Medicare Part B
Premiums for Qualifying Individuals:
Federal Fiscal Year 2006 and Fiscal
Year 2007
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25896; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NE–33–AD; Amendment 39–
14775; AD 2006–20–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company CF34–10E Series
Turbofan Engines; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document makes a
correction to Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2006–20–06. That AD applies to
General Electric Company (GE) CF34–
10E series turbofan engines. We
published AD 2006–20–06 in the
Federal Register on September 29, 2006
(71 FR 57403). The issue date of the AD
was inadvertently omitted. This
document adds the AD issue date. In all
other respects, the original document
remains the same.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective October
16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara
Fitzgerald, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (781) 238–7130; fax (781)
238–7199.
A final
rule AD, FR Doc. 06–8284, that applies
to GE CF34–10E series turbofan engines
was published in the Federal Register
on September 29, 2006 (71 FR 57403).
The following correction is needed:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
On page 57405, in the first column,
after compliance paragraph (q), add
‘‘Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts,
on September 21, 2006.’’
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
I
Issued in Burlington, MA, on October 6,
2006.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–17007 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth the
methodology and process used to
compute and issue each State’s
allotments for fiscal years (FY) 2006 and
FY 2007 that are available to pay
Medicare Part B premiums for
qualifying individuals. It also provides
the final FY 2006 allotments and the
preliminary FY 2007 allotments
determined under this methodology.
We are also confirming the April 28,
2006 interim final rule as final.
DATES: Effective November 15, 2006, the
interim rule amending 42 CFR part 433,
which was published on April 28, 2006
(71 FR 25085), is adopted as final.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Allotments Prior to FY 2005
Section 1902 of the Social Security
Act (the Act) sets forth the requirements
for State plans for medical assistance.
Before August 5, 1997, section
1902(a)(10)(E) of the Act specified that
the State Medicaid plan must provide
for some or all types of Medicare cost
sharing for three eligibility groups of
low-income Medicare beneficiaries.
These three groups included qualified
Medicare beneficiaries (QMBs),
specified low-income Medicare
beneficiaries (SLMBs), and qualified
disabled and working individuals
(QDWIs).
A QMB is an individual entitled to
Medicare Part A with income at or
below the Federal poverty line (FPL)
and resources below $4,000 for an
individual and $6,000 for a couple. A
SLMB is an individual who meets the
QMB criteria, except that his or her
income is above 100 percent of the FPL
and does not exceed 120 percent of the
FPL. A QDWI is a disabled individual
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60663
who is entitled to enroll in Medicare
Part A under section 1818A of the Act,
whose income does not exceed 200
percent of the FPL for a family of the
size involved, whose resources do not
exceed twice the amount allowed under
the Supplementary Security Income
(SSI) program, and who is not otherwise
eligible for Medicaid. The definition of
Medicare cost-sharing at section
1905(p)(3) of the Act includes payment
for premiums for Medicare Part B.
Section 4732 of the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997 (BBA), enacted on August
5, 1997, amended section 1902(a)(10)(E)
of the Act to require States to provide
for Medicaid payment of the Medicare
Part B premiums for two additional
eligibility groups of low-income
Medicare beneficiaries, referred to as
qualifying individuals (QIs).
Specifically, a new section
1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(I) of the Act was
added, under which States must pay the
full amount of the Medicare Part B
premium for qualifying individuals who
are eligible QMBs but for the fact that
their income level is at least 120 percent
of the FPL but less than 135 percent of
the FPL for a family of the size involved.
These individuals cannot otherwise be
eligible for medical assistance under the
approved State Medicaid plan. The
second group of QIs added under
section 1902(a)(10)(E)(iv)(II) of the Act
includes Medicare beneficiaries who
would be QMBs except that their
income is at least 135 percent but less
than 175 percent of the FPL for a family
of the size involved, who are not
otherwise eligible for Medicaid under
the approved State plan. These QIs were
eligible for only a portion of Medicare
cost sharing consisting of a percentage
of the increase in the Medicare Part B
premium attributable to the shift of
Medicare home health coverage from
Part A to Part B (as provided in section
4611 of the BBA).
Coverage of the second group of QIs
ended on December 31, 2002, and in
2003, section 401 of the Welfare Reform
Bill (Pub. L. 108–89), enacted on
October 1, 2003, eliminated reference to
the QI–2 benefit. In each of the years
2002 and 2003, continuing resolutions
extended the coverage of the first group
of QIs (whose income is at least 120
percent but less than 135 percent of the
Federal poverty line) through the
following fiscal year, but maintained the
annual funding at the FY 2002 level.
In 2004, Public Law 108–448 was
enacted, which continued coverage of
this group through September 30, 2005,
again with no change in funding.
The BBA also added a new section
1933 to the Act to provide for Medicaid
payment of Medicare Part B premiums
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60662-60663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16998]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket No. EE-TP-98-550]
RIN 1904-AA85
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Distribution
Transformers; Correction
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical corrections.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) published a
final rule on April 27, 2006, amending Part 431 to prescribe test
procedures and other provisions for distribution transformers, pursuant
to sections 323(b)(10) and 346(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation
Act, as amended. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(10) and 6317(a)) This document
corrects three typographical errors in the final rule.
DATES: This correction is effective October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio Bouza, U.S. Department of
Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies
Program, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121, (202) 586-4563, e-mail: antonio.bouza@ee.doe.gov.
Francine Pinto, Esq., U.S. Department of Energy, Office of General
Counsel, GC-72, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121, (202) 586-9507, e-mail: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final rule that is the subject of this
correction document established (1) Test procedures for measuring the
energy efficiency of distribution transformers, (2) definitions to
delineate the products covered by the test procedures, (3) provisions
manufacturers must use to implement the test procedures, (4)
calculation methods for determining the efficiency of distribution
transformers, and (5) enforcement provisions for this equipment. 71 FR
24971 (April 27, 2006).
Need for Corrections
As published in the final rule, the definition for the term
``excitation current'' which can also be referred to as ``no-load
current'' contains a typographical error that may prove to be
misleading, and needs to be corrected. In the final rule, the
conjunction ``or'' appearing between the terms ``excitation current''
and ``no-load current'' was italicized, such that the two terms
excitation current and no-load current appeared as one continuous
phrase (i.e., excitation current or no-load current). The Department is
concerned that the italicization of the word ``or'' may lead to
confusion about the defined term. This technical correction document
removes the italicization of the word ``or.'' The remainder of the
definition (i.e., ``means the current that flows in any winding used to
excite the transformer when all other windings are open-circuited'')
was correct in the final rule and is not amended by this technical
correction.
In a comment submitted after the publication of the final rule,
NEMA brought to the Department's attention two typographical errors
that have an impact on the calculation of distribution transformer
efficiency and must be corrected. (NEMA, No. 61 at p. 1) In the final
rule notice, Equation 5-1 was given as:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16OC06.009
And an explanation of one of the terms in equation 5-1, Pos,
was given as follows:
Pos is the specified energy efficiency load level,
where, Pos = PorL2, and
NEMA determined that there are typographical errors in both
equation 5-1 and the explanation of the term Pos. The
Department carefully reviewed this comment, and agrees with NEMA's
determination. In equation 5-1, the quantity contained in the square
brackets should be squared (i.e., raised to the second power). In the
explanation of the term Pos, the variable represented by the
letter ``L'' should not be squared. These errors were present in the
Department's previous supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking for
this test procedure (69 FR 45532), but were not identified at that
time.
Today's technical correction document amends equation 5-1, raising
the contents of the square brackets to the second power, so the
corrected equation reads as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16OC06.010
Similarly, this technical correction document amends the
explanation of the term Pos to remove the square from the
variable L, so the corrected equation reads as follows:
Pos is the specified energy efficiency load level, where
Pos = PorL, and
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 431
Administrative practice and procedure, Distribution transformers,
Energy conservation.
0
Accordingly, 10 CFR part 431 is amended by making the following
technical corrections:
PART 431--ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 431 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.
0
2. In Sec. 431.192, revise the definition of ``excitation current'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 431.192 Definitions.
* * * * *
Excitation current or no-load current means the current that flows
in any winding used to excite the transformer when all other windings
are open-circuited.
* * * * *
0
3. In section 5.1 of Appendix A to Subpart K of Part 431, revise
equation 5-1 and the explanation for the term Pos to read as
follows:
Appendix A to Subpart K of Part 431--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Distribution Transformers
* * * * *
5.1 Output Loading Level Adjustment.
* * * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16OC06.011
Where:
* * * * *
Pos is the specified energy efficiency load level,
where Pos = PorL, and
* * * * *
[[Page 60663]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 2, 2006.
Alexander A. Karsner,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. E6-16998 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
