Defense Advisory Board, 60116-60120 [E6-16898]
Download as PDF
60116
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Notices
PARTIAL HOSPITALIZATION RATES FOR FULL-DAY AND HALF-DAY PROGRAMS FY 2007—Continued
Full-day rate
(6 hours or
more)
United States census region
Puerto Rico
196
The above rates are effective for
services rendered on or after October 1,
2006.
Dated: October 5, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–8628 Filed 10–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Advisory Board
Department of Defense.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Defense Advisory Board
meeting convened at 8 a.m., Friday,
September 22, 2006, but did not have a
quorum. The meeting was allowed and
conducted in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) exception that no deliberation
or voting can take place absent a
quorum. These conditions were adhered
to. Additionally, hard copies of all
briefings from the meeting will be
forwarded to the absent members and a
confirmation printout of the transmitted
briefings will be kept on file as a matter
of record.
Location: Pentagon, Room 2E219.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Attendees
Members
David A. Janes, Chairman, DAB;
Chairman and CEO, Janes Capital
Partners.
Donald V. Esmond, Senior VP
Automotive Operations, Toyota Motor
Sales.
Walter P. Havenstein, Executive Vice
President, BAE Systems North
America.
W. Thomas Musser, Chairman of the
Board, Tri-M Group, LLC and Tri-M
Holdings, LLC.
Kathleen M. Naylor, Director,
Worldwide Executive and Leadership
Development, UNISYS Corp.
Joyce Reed, Community Relations
Manager, Tyson Foods, Inc.
Absent
William T. Powell, President, Institute
for Defense and Business.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
John T. Gremp, VP–Energy Production
Systems, Energy Systems Group, FMC
Technologies, Inc.
Bradley T. MacDonald, Chairman and
CEO, Medifast, Inc.
Jeffery C. Crowe, Chairman and CEO,
Landstar System, Inc.
Michael J. Earley, President and CEO,
Bankers Trust Company.
Christopher K. Komisarjevsky, President
and CEO, Emeritus, Burson-Marsteller
Worldwide.
Kenneth L. Gile, President, Skybus
Airlines.
Department of Defense
The Honorable Thomas F. Hall,
Assistant Secretary of Defense,
Reserve Affairs.
Craig W. Duehring, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense,
Reserve Affairs.
Bob Hollingsworth, Executive Secretary,
DAB.
Mr. Tom Bush, Principal Deputy
Manpower & Personnel, Office of the
Secretary of Defense, Reserve Affairs.
Phil Pope, Designated Federal Officer,
DAB.
Roxie Merritt, Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense, PA, Internal
Com/Public Liaison.
Ted Kehr, Director, Employer Support
Division, National Guard Bureau.
Public
Mr. Nick Dawson, Department of Labor,
Veterans Employment and Training
Services.
Mr. Marcus Bradshaw, Department of
Labor, Veterans Employment and
Training Services.
Speakers
The Honorable Thomas F. Hall,
Assistant Secretary of Defense,
Reserve Affairs. Topic: Welcome and
Opening Remarks.
Kathleen Naylor, Director, Worldwide
Executive and Leadership
Development, UNISYS Corp. and
Roxie Merritt, Office of the Secretary
of Defense, PA for Internal Com/
Public Liaison. Topic:
Communications/Outreach Update.
Nick Dawson and Marcus Bradshaw,
Veteran’s Administration Department
of Labor. Topic: Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment
Rights Act (USERRA).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Half-day rate
(3–5 hours)
148
Bob Hollingsworth, National Committee
for Employer Support of the Guard
(NCESGR) and Reserve Executive
Director and DAB Executive
Secretary. Topic: ESGR Outreach
Status Brief.
Tom Bush, Principal Deputy Manpower
and Personnel, Office of the Secretary
of Defense, Reserve Affairs. Topic:
‘‘Transitioning To An Operational
Reserve’’.
DAB Meeting Summary
Meeting discussions focused on four
primary areas:
(1) Leveraging and implementation of
long-range strategic communications
plan that uses public affairs tactics
designed to assist branding NCESGR,
while targeting key messages to
employers.
(2) An information brief of USERRA
rights and responsibilities as they affect
Reserve Component members/
employers.
(3) Employer data and impact on
employers as Guard and Reserve
transition from a Strategic Reserve to an
Operational Reserve.
(4) OSD–RA Manpower and Personnel
prospective of transition to an
Operational Reserve.
Invited speakers discussed more
aggressive public affairs efforts to
enhance communications with
employers; the ongoing process to
educate and inform employers and
Defense Advisory Board (DAB) members
regarding legal rights and
responsibilities under the Uniformed
Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA);
the purpose and function of NCESGR
and transitioning from a Strategic
Reserve to an Operational Reserve.
Opening Remarks
Secretary Thomas F. Hall, Assistant
Secretary of Defense, Reserve Affairs
Secretary Hall thanked Mr.
Hollingsworth and his team for a great
Leadership Conference, and the
culmination of a superb Freedom Award
Dinner, which also resulted in late night
news coverage emphasizing the
significant support provided to the
nation’s Guard and Reserve by
America’s exceptional employers.
General Cody did a great job with his
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Notices
Meeting Presenters
David Janes, DAB Chairman
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
speech, as well as WLS–Channel 7
News broadcast reporter Mr. Leon
Harris, the event Master of Ceremonies.
Later today, 15 distinguished employer
recipients of the Secretary of Defense
Employer Support Freedom Award will
meet with President Bush at the Oval
Office.
Topic: Communications/Outreach
Update
On Thursday, September 21, 2006,
NCESGR held its annual Leadership
Conference in which all State and
Territory Field Committee Chairs were
in attendance. This is the first time that
only the Chairs were invited to the
conference without any other Field
Committee Executive members.
Everyone came with lots of positive
energy. We have fielded the best group
of volunteer leaders in the past three
years, very professional and energetic.
Furthermore, a lot of positive changes
have taken place in the past three years
that has led us to this remarkable team
of Field Committee Chairs. This is
attributed in large part to the
tremendous support received from both
NCESGR and the Office of the Secretary
of Defense for Reserve Affairs (OSD–RA)
staff, which continues to reinforce why
ESGR is important. Everyone’s hard
work has made a difference and that has
contributed to making this the strongest
Field Committee Chair Team ever.
A number of DAB members have
expressed that it would be beneficial for
them to visit a training mobilization site
while Guardsmen are mobilizing. Fort
Dix in New Jersey, Fort McCoy in
Wisconsin, and 29 Palms in California
are among the potential venues that
could be researched. Our next meeting
scheduled in February of 2007 could be
held at a National Guard Bureau
mobility site during an actual training
mobilization in order for DAB members
to experience what type of preparation
guard reserve members go through
during mobilization. Mr. Hollingsworth
has agreed to investigate possible
training sites.
Minutes from the June 2006 meeting
have been approved and have been
posted in the Federal Register, as a
matter of public record.
A draft of the September 22, 2006
meeting minutes will be sent to DAB
members for review prior to publication
and hard copies of all slide
presentations will be mailed to the
members absent to ensure DAB
Committee meeting compliance with
FACA guidance absent a quorum.
The DAB determined that there is an
ongoing need to build stronger
partnerships with employers of guard
and reserve members. The development
of an integrated communications plan
has been drafted to address the lack of
reliable methods by which the DoD can
convey information routinely to
employers of guard and reserve
members. The premise for this initiative
is to establish an ongoing mechanism to
communicate information about the
Department of Defense, and associated
agencies VA, and DoL regarding related
plans, policies, mobilizations and
training issues for Reserve component
members and employers. The following
topics were discussed:
Integrated Plan
• Utilize broadcast, Web, print and
outreach tools (events) and key
individuals to highlight NCESGR and
model employers of Guardsmen and
Reservists.
• Leverage Freedom Awards
Ceremony, America Supports You,
Employer Boss Lifts and other contract
resources.
Web/News Media Approaches
• Use American Forces Press Service
reporters to cover and generate wire
stories on events.
• Wire stories can be distributed to
more than 1,000 military publications
and newspapers world-wide.
• Deploy on-line survey to employers
to gain additional insights on their view,
perspectives and support they wish.
• Post key communications/messages
to https://www.Defenselink.mil which
receives more than 65,000 unique hits
per day.
Broadcast
• Use Pentagon Channel television
crew to cover NCESGR events.
• Pentagon Channel can be viewed
world-wide and is carried on a number
of commercial cable and satellite
providers.
• The broadcast piece will be
available on https://
www.pentagonchannel.mil the day the
piece airs on Pentagon Channel.
• Event will be promoted on the
Pentagon Channel crawler.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
Kathleen Naylor, Director, Worldwide
Executive & Leadership Development,
UNISYS Corp.
Roxie Merritt, Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense, PA (Internal Com/
Public Liaison)
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60117
• Determine other media possibilities
outside government to leverage NCESGR
events.
Print/Outreach
• NCESGR events will be included in
regular outreach products DoD updates
for distribution and releases on the day
of the event.
• Events will be posted to OSD-PA
event calendar.
• Story to be carried in the National
Guard Family Readiness Newsletter.
• Leverage ‘‘Hometown News’’ local
newspapers and work with America
Supports You, and grass roots
organizations.
• Use Legislative body to promote/
support outreach (Senators/Internal
Legislative Affairs, DoD Legislative
Affairs, and White House Legislative
Affairs staff).
Online Survey
Utilize/leverage all vehicles available
to include DoL, recruiting commands, if
feasible, and others to launch survey to
employers (sample survey to be
developed and will be short/succinct
and will leverage work of Freedom
Awards recipients).
Outreach by Legislative Body/Media
• Leverage internal resources—share
NCESGR/DAB strategy, ask for their
input and reach out to those who have
stepped forward to bridge gaps and
build relationships.
• Feature stories in key publications
and at key events (with photos)—Start
with leveraging recurring events such
as, NCESGR’s annual Freedom Awards.
Charting a Way Ahead
• Identify quick ways to deploy an
online survey to employers.
• Obtain NCESGR resources to work
with OSD–PA, DoD and DAB.
• Identify concise survey topics to
address with employers.
• Define how success of media
initiatives will be measured.
• Work to engage support and
involvement of House and Senate
members to promote NCESGR.
• Dedicate internal NCESGR staff to
support communications if this
initiative is a priority.
• Define actions/dates to leverage
existing DoD initiatives i.e., America
Supports You.
• Routinely interface with DoL point
person to leverage key messages,
outreach and DoD/DoL use of the
Civilian Employer Information database.
• Commit aggressive support from
DAB to move initiative forward.
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
60118
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Mr. Nick Dawson and Mr. Marcus
Bradshaw, Department of Labor (DoL),
Veterans Employment and Training
Services (VETS)
Topic: Uniformed Services Employment
and Reemployment Rights Act
(USERRA)
A big compliance problem employers’
face is a limited knowledge and
understanding about USERRA. NCESGR
and DoL (VETS) are simultaneously
engaged in an ongoing concerted effort
to help educate employers, Guardsmen
and Reservists about their rights and
responsibilities. The following
information was discussed:
Who USERRA Covers
• The Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act (USERRA) was enacted in 1994
under Title 38, U.S. Code, 4301–4334.
• USERRA applies to virtually all
employers (foreign and domestic) in the
United States and its Territories.
• USERRA generally protects persons
who perform, have performed or apply
to perform service in the uniformed
services.
• Service in the uniformed services
includes voluntary and involuntary
service, both during wartime and in
peacetime.
• Since 2002, service by intermittent
disaster response personnel for FEMA
and training to perform such service is
considered service in the uniformed
services and is protected by USERRA.
Employment Rights
• Employment rights consist of
protections against employment
discrimination and employer retaliation.
• Employers may not discriminate in
employment, reemployment, retention
in employment, promotions or any
benefit of employment on the basis of a
person’s prior military service, current
military obligations, or an intent to join
one of the uniformed services.
• Also, an employer may not take any
adverse action to retaliate against a
person who has attempted to enforce his
or her rights under USERRA.
• The law also prohibits retaliation
against a person who assists or testifies
in an investigation or other enforcement
action. Such person is protected from
retaliation even if he or she has no
military connection.
Reemployment Rights
• If the returning employee meets the
eligibility criteria, he or she is entitled
to prompt reemployment in accordance
with what is referred to as the ‘‘escalator
principle,’’ which was first laid down
by the Supreme Court in the first
reemployment rights case it decided, in
1946.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
• The person is to be reemployed in
the position he or she would have
attained if he or she had remained
continuously employed during the
period of military service. If the period
of military service was for more than 90
days, the employer has the option to
reemploy the person in the ‘‘escalator’’
position or in another similar position
with like seniority, status and rate of
pay. An employer is required to make
reasonable efforts to accommodate a
disability incurred or aggravated during
the period of military service.
• An employee who performs service
of 31 or more days, must, upon request
of the employer, provide documentation
(official orders or DD–214) that shows
the employee is eligible for
reemployment. However, if the
documentation is not readily available
or doesn’t exist, the employer must still
reemploy the returning employee. The
employer can also contact the DoD
(ESGR) or the employee’s command to
obtain documentation.
• The employer is excused from the
obligation to reemploy if the employer’s
circumstances have changed so as to
make the reemployment impossible or
unreasonable. This would apply, for
example, if the employer has a bona fide
layoff that would have included the
service member.
• An employer is also excused from
reemployment obligations if the
employee in question held a position
that was to last for only a brief nonrecurrent period with no expectation
that it would continue indefinitely or
for a significant period of time.
Benefits and Pensions
• Upon reemployment, the employee
is entitled to the seniority and seniorityrelated benefits he or she had at the
beginning of the military plus whatever
seniority and seniority benefits he or
she would have gained during the
period of military service.
• While absent to serve in the
uniformed services, the employee is
considered on furlough or leave of
absence and is entitled to rights and
benefits not based on seniority as are
generally given to similarly situated
employees on other types leave of
absence.
• An employee and his or her
dependents must be allowed (upon
request) to receive continued coverage
under the employer’s health plan while
performing military service. The period
of coverage is the lesser of 24 months
from the beginning of the absence or the
actual period of the military leave of
absence. If the period of military service
is 31 days or more, the employer may
require the employee to pay up to 102%
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the full premium for continuation
coverage. The employee pays only the
normal employee share, if any for
military service of 30 days or less. If the
health plan is discontinued during the
period of service, it must be reinstated
immediately upon reemployment. There
are no exclusions allowed, except for
conditions determined by VA to be
service-connected.
• Regarding pensions, an employee
reemployed following service must be
given credit for the period of service for
purposes of benefits and vesting. If a
plan is contributory, the employee must
be allowed to make up missed employee
contributions, and the employer must
match those contributions in accordance
with the plan’s provisions.
• Additional USERRA information
can be found at https://www.esgr.org and
https://www.dol.gov/vets.
Bob Hollingsworth, Executive Director,
ESGR
Topic: ESGR Outreach Status Brief
NCESGR continues to use employer
outreach initiatives as a strategic tool to
communicate and gain support from
employers of Guard and Reserve.
Through its outreach efforts, NCESGR
has been able to identify and
successfully partner with industry
leaders, military organizations and
government agencies.
ESGR State committees have also
conducted proactive outreach to known
employers of Reserve component
members through direct mail marketing
campaigns. Recently NCESGR Executive
Director Bob Hollingsworth presented a
Civilian Employer Information (CEI)
brief presented to the Chairman’s
Reserve Conference, which was well
received. The following CEI information
was discussed:
What We Know
• Roughly 1⁄3 of Select Reserve
civilian employers are employed in the
public sector.
• Just over 1⁄2 of Select Reserve
civilian employers employ fewer than
100 total employees.
• Eating and drinking establishments
and medical offices are the top two
industries that employ Reserve
component members.
• Large firms such as, the U.S. Postal
Service, Federal Express, Sears Holdings
Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Lockheed
Martin Corp., The Home Depot Inc., and
Northrop Grumman Corp., employ
hundreds of Reservists each.
• Police, truck drivers, correctional
officers, technicians, pilots, and flight
engineers, bailiffs, nurses, automotive
technicians and retail sales persons
comprise the top 10 occupations and
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Notices
accounts for 26% of National
Guardsmen and Reservists.
• Even though NCESGR has pushed
to insert the term ‘‘employer’’ into every
topic, the leaders within the Pentagon
are not receptive and do not see the
importance to include the employer in
topics as they do with ‘‘family’’
terminology.
• Job placement, discrimination,
harassment, and termination protection
are recurring concerns from year to year.
This is noteworthy because these areas
are most likely to impact recruiting and
retention.
Employer Feedback
• Employers’ lack of knowledge on
USERRA is a barrier to compliance.
• Employers report that the greatest
impact of mobilizations on their
company is operational.
• Employers’ biggest concerns are
uncertainty over timing of activations
and the length of activations.
Future topics of discussion:
• Does DoD consider the impact on
the employers of Guardsmen and
Reservists and the impact to civilian
employment of Guardsmen and
Reservists in the decisionmaking
process?
• Does DoD recognize employers as
key partners in order to field a viable
Reserve component?
• Do employers understand the
significance of the change from a
Strategic Reserve to an Operational
Reserve and how it will impact them?
• Do Guardsmen/Reservists
understand the significance of the
change from a Strategic Reserve to an
Operational Reserve and how it will
impact them?
• What is the threshold of pain that
employers are willing to accept for
Reserve component service?
• What is the threshold of pain that
Reservists/Guardsmen are willing to
tolerate to their civilian employment?
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Tom Bush, Principal Deputy, Manpower
and Personnel for the Office of the
Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs
Topic: ‘‘Transitioning to an Operational
Reserve’’
More than 30 years have passed since
the inception of the all volunteer force
in 1973. Historically, Reserve
component members have trained for
mobilization and responded when
called to duty to augment the active
forces during war or large scale
conflicts—this is the Strategic Reserve.
But as forces were drawn down
beginning in the mid to late 1980s, the
Reserve components were increasingly
called upon to support ongoing
operational requirements. This began
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
the transition to an Operational Reserve.
Today, the Guard and Reserve are more
actively engaged in operation than any
time since the Korean War, supporting
both the Global War on Terror and daily
operations.
• As background, the Reserve
structure has three major categories: the
Ready Reserve (which is comprised of
the Selected Reserve and Individual
Ready Reserve), the Standby Reserve,
and the Retired Reserve. The category
that is the most well known is the
Selected Reserve since this is the
category that regularly performs military
duty (48 inactive duty periods or
‘‘drills’’ each year and two weeks of
annual training).
• During the first Gulf War and since
9/11, the Operational tempo of the
Guard and Reserve has increased
significantly. The annual average of .09
million duty days served in 1987 to
provide operational support has been
eclipsed 67 fold to 68.3 million duty
days served in 2005 for operational
support.
• Volunteerism is a key attribute of
the Operational Reserve.
• The long-standing rules governing
the use of the Guard and Reserve were
designed for a Strategic Reserve—
prepare for mobilization (train) and
mobilize. To support a continuum of
service for an Operational Reserve, the
paradigm must shift:
—A ‘‘Rheostat’’ approach (each
transition between duty statuses)
rather than a ‘‘Circuit Breaker’’
approach (performing only required
training, or being mobilized).
—Flexible system that supports any
level of service.
—No more ‘‘workarounds.’’
—Easy to transition from civilian to
military and back.
—Common pay system that
accommodates varying levels of
service is required.
—Variable Reserve component pool
optimizing assets with flexibility to
serve from zero to 365 days.
• What’s Needed To Transition to an
Operational Reserve:
—Define an ‘‘Operational Reserve.’’
—Develop proper expectations.
—Develop new availability and service
paradigm.
—Determine the operational role of the
National Guard.
• What is the New Guard and
Reserve?
—Today’s new Guard and Reserve has
both a strategic and operational role.
—How will the New Guard and Reserve
Support Operational Missions?
The new Guard and Reserve will be
organized, equipped and trained to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60119
support operational military mission
requirements to the same standard as
the Regular component. Individuals and
units will be tasked to prepare for and
participate in missions, across the full
spectrum of operations, in a cyclic or
periodic manner that provides
predictability for service members, their
families and employers.
Comments from individual members:
• Mr. Havenstein—He had received
an e-mail from his operations officer
who recently attended an ESGR state
committee Bosslift. The employers who
were in attendance were awestruck on
how much they learned about their
employees while they performed
weekend drills. The operations officer
wanted this feedback to be told to
NCESGR senior leadership ‘‘that
Bosslifts are truly important and should
continue to be supported.’’
• Mr. Havenstein—The ESGR state
committee New Hampshire Chair was
recently at a concert of more than 6,000
people; when the concert stopped for an
intermission, the Chair was able to
recognize one of his Guardsmen at the
concert. All 6,000 people stood and
applauded the service member.
• Ms. Reed—Are the local Chamber of
Commerces involved or invited to
participate in Bosslifts? Mr.
Hollingsworth and Mr. Janes both
replied that the local Chambers are
notified of Bosslifts, as well as other
ESGR state committee events.
• Mr. Musser—There is a big push to
institutionalize the term ‘‘employer’’
within the Pentagon and as a member of
the DAB, I offer to assist in writing a
plan and letter to make this initiative
happen.
• Mr. Havenstein—Requested the
DAB receive a copy of the last Reserve
component Chief briefings. Mr. Janes
and Mr. Hollingsworth stated they
would have a copy of the last Reserve
Chief presentation package to the team
before the end of the day. A copy of all
Reserve Chief briefings was delivered
and distributed to the DAB team prior
to their departure.
• Mr. Janes and Mr. Hollingsworth—
The Pinnacle Advance initiative is a
phased direct marketing campaign being
mailed to all Guardsmen and Reservists.
The process requests support from the
service member to provide employer
information that promotes USERRA and
solicits a statement of support to their
employer. The U.S. Army Reserve
(USAR) and the Army National Guard
(ARNG) were the first recipients of this
initiative by NCESGR. Leaders for both
the USAR and ARNG are in full support
of the Pinnacle Advance initiative. The
next Reserve components scheduled to
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
60120
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Notices
receive the Pinnacle Advance initiative
(pending funding availability) are:
USMC Reserve, NAVY Reserve, Coast
Guard Reserve, Air National Guard, and
the Air Force Reserve Command.
• Mr. Havenstein, Ms. Naylor—It is
important that unit commanders
develop a partnership with employers.
Relationship building may help with the
angst of the unpredictability of some
deployments. Perhaps this initiative
should be considered for all of NCESGR
programs, so that we can figure out how
to best support it. Although the unit
commander’s primary responsibility is
to ensure their units are combat ready,
there still needs to be a directive or
mandatory training requirement that
includes employer support. We should
solicit support and participation from
employers and unit commanders to help
move the initiative forward.
Closing Comments from Chairman
Janes:
Today’s meeting did not have a
quorum due to the last minute
cancellations of three individuals. All
items discussed today that had possible
taskers will be brought up at the next
meeting with a quorum and will then be
assigned as official taskers.
Additionally, the agenda for the next
meeting will be structured to enable
those absent to present their slide
materials.
Next meeting for the DAB is
scheduled for February 2007.
Dated: October 5, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E6–16898 Filed 10–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense
[DOD–2006–OS–0206]
Privacy Act of 1974; Computer
Matching Program
Defense Manpower Data
Center, Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of a Computer Matching
Agreement.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Subsection (e)(12) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552a), requires agencies to
publish advanced notice of any
proposed or revised computer matching
program by the matching agency for
public comment. The DoD, as the
matching agency under the Privacy Act
is hereby giving notice to the record
subjects of computer matching program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
between VA and DoD that their records
are being matched by computer. The
purpose is to verify eligibility for the
DoD/USCG members of the Reserve
forces who receive VA disability
compensation or pension to also receive
military pay and allowances when
performing reserve duty.
DATES: This proposed action will
become effective November 13, 2006
and the computer matching will
proceed accordingly without further
notice, unless comments are received
which would result in a contrary
determination or if the Office of
Management and Budget or Congress
objects thereto. Any public comment
must be received before the effective
date.
ADDRESSES: Any interested party may
submit written comments to the
Director, Defense Privacy Office, 1901
South Bell Street, Suite 920, Arlington,
VA 22202–4512.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Vahan Moushegian, Jr. at (703) 607–
2943.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to subsection (o) of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
DMDC and VA have concluded an
agreement to conduct a computer
matching program between the agencies.
The purpose of the match is to verify
eligibility for the DoD/USCG members
of the Reserve forces who receive VA
disability compensation or pension to
also receive military pay and allowances
when performing reserve duty.
The parties to this agreement have
determined that a computer matching
program is the most efficient,
expeditious, and effective means of
obtaining and processing the
information needed by the VA to
identify those individuals who are
receiving both VA compensation and
DoD/USCG payments for those periods
when they are performing Reserve duty.
By law, the individual must waive his
or here entitlement to VA disability
compensation or pension if he or she
desires to receive DoD/USCG pay and
allowances for the period of duty
performed. This matching agreement
will result in an accurate reconciliation
of such payments by permitting the VA
to determine which individuals are
being paid by DoD/USCG for duty
performed and are being paid VA
disability compensation or pension
benefit for the same period of time
without a waiver on file with the VA. If
this reconciliation is not done by
computer matching, but is done
mutually, the cost would be prohibitive
and most dual payments would not be
detected.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A copy of the computer matching
agreement between VA and DoD is
available upon request. Requests should
be submitted to the address caption
above or to the Department of Veterans
Affairs, Veterans Benefit
Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420.
Set forth below is the notice of the
establishment of a computer matching
program required by paragraph 6.c. of
the Office of Management and Budget
Guidelines on computer matching
published on June 19, 1989, at 54 FR
25818.
The matching agreement, as required
by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the Privacy Act,
and an advance copy of this notice was
submitted on October 2, 2006, to the
House Committee on Government
Reform, the Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs, and the Administrator of the
Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to paragraph 4d of Appendix
I to OMB Circular No. A–130, Federal
Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining
Records about Individuals’, dated
February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61
FR 6427).
Dated: October 5, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
NOTICE OF A COMPUTER MATCHING
PROGRAM BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT
OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR
RESERVE PAY RECONCILIATION
A. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES:
Participants in this computer
matching program are the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Defense
Manpower Data Center (DMC) of the
Department of Defense (DoD). The VA is
the source agency, i.e., the activity
disclosing the records for the purpose of
the match. The DMC is the specific
recipient activity or matching agency,
i.e., the agency that actually performs
the computer matching.
B. PURPOSE OF THE MATCH:
The purpose of this agreement is to
verify eligibility for DoD/USCG
members of the Reserve forces who
receive VA disability compensation or
pension to also receive military pay and
allowance when performing reserve
duty.
C. AUTHORITY FOR CONDUCTING THE MATCH:
The legal authority for conducting the
matching program is 38 U.S.C. 5304(c)
which provides that VA disability
compensation or pension based upon
his or her previous military service shall
not be paid to a person for any period
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 197 (Thursday, October 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60116-60120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Advisory Board
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Advisory Board meeting convened at 8 a.m., Friday,
September 22, 2006, but did not have a quorum. The meeting was allowed
and conducted in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) exception that no deliberation or voting can take place absent a
quorum. These conditions were adhered to. Additionally, hard copies of
all briefings from the meeting will be forwarded to the absent members
and a confirmation printout of the transmitted briefings will be kept
on file as a matter of record.
Location: Pentagon, Room 2E219.
Attendees
Members
David A. Janes, Chairman, DAB; Chairman and CEO, Janes Capital
Partners.
Donald V. Esmond, Senior VP Automotive Operations, Toyota Motor Sales.
Walter P. Havenstein, Executive Vice President, BAE Systems North
America.
W. Thomas Musser, Chairman of the Board, Tri-M Group, LLC and Tri-M
Holdings, LLC.
Kathleen M. Naylor, Director, Worldwide Executive and Leadership
Development, UNISYS Corp.
Joyce Reed, Community Relations Manager, Tyson Foods, Inc.
Absent
William T. Powell, President, Institute for Defense and Business.
John T. Gremp, VP-Energy Production Systems, Energy Systems Group, FMC
Technologies, Inc.
Bradley T. MacDonald, Chairman and CEO, Medifast, Inc.
Jeffery C. Crowe, Chairman and CEO, Landstar System, Inc.
Michael J. Earley, President and CEO, Bankers Trust Company.
Christopher K. Komisarjevsky, President and CEO, Emeritus, Burson-
Marsteller Worldwide.
Kenneth L. Gile, President, Skybus Airlines.
Department of Defense
The Honorable Thomas F. Hall, Assistant Secretary of Defense, Reserve
Affairs.
Craig W. Duehring, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense,
Reserve Affairs.
Bob Hollingsworth, Executive Secretary, DAB.
Mr. Tom Bush, Principal Deputy Manpower & Personnel, Office of the
Secretary of Defense, Reserve Affairs.
Phil Pope, Designated Federal Officer, DAB.
Roxie Merritt, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, PA,
Internal Com/Public Liaison.
Ted Kehr, Director, Employer Support Division, National Guard Bureau.
Public
Mr. Nick Dawson, Department of Labor, Veterans Employment and Training
Services.
Mr. Marcus Bradshaw, Department of Labor, Veterans Employment and
Training Services.
Speakers
The Honorable Thomas F. Hall, Assistant Secretary of Defense, Reserve
Affairs. Topic: Welcome and Opening Remarks.
Kathleen Naylor, Director, Worldwide Executive and Leadership
Development, UNISYS Corp. and Roxie Merritt, Office of the Secretary of
Defense, PA for Internal Com/Public Liaison. Topic: Communications/
Outreach Update.
Nick Dawson and Marcus Bradshaw, Veteran's Administration Department of
Labor. Topic: Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
(USERRA).
Bob Hollingsworth, National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard
(NCESGR) and Reserve Executive Director and DAB Executive Secretary.
Topic: ESGR Outreach Status Brief.
Tom Bush, Principal Deputy Manpower and Personnel, Office of the
Secretary of Defense, Reserve Affairs. Topic: ``Transitioning To An
Operational Reserve''.
DAB Meeting Summary
Meeting discussions focused on four primary areas:
(1) Leveraging and implementation of long-range strategic
communications plan that uses public affairs tactics designed to assist
branding NCESGR, while targeting key messages to employers.
(2) An information brief of USERRA rights and responsibilities as
they affect Reserve Component members/employers.
(3) Employer data and impact on employers as Guard and Reserve
transition from a Strategic Reserve to an Operational Reserve.
(4) OSD-RA Manpower and Personnel prospective of transition to an
Operational Reserve.
Invited speakers discussed more aggressive public affairs efforts
to enhance communications with employers; the ongoing process to
educate and inform employers and Defense Advisory Board (DAB) members
regarding legal rights and responsibilities under the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA); the purpose
and function of NCESGR and transitioning from a Strategic Reserve to an
Operational Reserve.
Opening Remarks
Secretary Thomas F. Hall, Assistant Secretary of Defense, Reserve
Affairs
Secretary Hall thanked Mr. Hollingsworth and his team for a great
Leadership Conference, and the culmination of a superb Freedom Award
Dinner, which also resulted in late night news coverage emphasizing the
significant support provided to the nation's Guard and Reserve by
America's exceptional employers. General Cody did a great job with his
[[Page 60117]]
speech, as well as WLS-Channel 7 News broadcast reporter Mr. Leon
Harris, the event Master of Ceremonies. Later today, 15 distinguished
employer recipients of the Secretary of Defense Employer Support
Freedom Award will meet with President Bush at the Oval Office.
David Janes, DAB Chairman
On Thursday, September 21, 2006, NCESGR held its annual Leadership
Conference in which all State and Territory Field Committee Chairs were
in attendance. This is the first time that only the Chairs were invited
to the conference without any other Field Committee Executive members.
Everyone came with lots of positive energy. We have fielded the best
group of volunteer leaders in the past three years, very professional
and energetic. Furthermore, a lot of positive changes have taken place
in the past three years that has led us to this remarkable team of
Field Committee Chairs. This is attributed in large part to the
tremendous support received from both NCESGR and the Office of the
Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs (OSD-RA) staff, which
continues to reinforce why ESGR is important. Everyone's hard work has
made a difference and that has contributed to making this the strongest
Field Committee Chair Team ever.
A number of DAB members have expressed that it would be beneficial
for them to visit a training mobilization site while Guardsmen are
mobilizing. Fort Dix in New Jersey, Fort McCoy in Wisconsin, and 29
Palms in California are among the potential venues that could be
researched. Our next meeting scheduled in February of 2007 could be
held at a National Guard Bureau mobility site during an actual training
mobilization in order for DAB members to experience what type of
preparation guard reserve members go through during mobilization. Mr.
Hollingsworth has agreed to investigate possible training sites.
Minutes from the June 2006 meeting have been approved and have been
posted in the Federal Register, as a matter of public record.
A draft of the September 22, 2006 meeting minutes will be sent to
DAB members for review prior to publication and hard copies of all
slide presentations will be mailed to the members absent to ensure DAB
Committee meeting compliance with FACA guidance absent a quorum.
Meeting Presenters
Kathleen Naylor, Director, Worldwide Executive & Leadership
Development, UNISYS Corp.
Roxie Merritt, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, PA
(Internal Com/Public Liaison)
Topic: Communications/Outreach Update
The DAB determined that there is an ongoing need to build stronger
partnerships with employers of guard and reserve members. The
development of an integrated communications plan has been drafted to
address the lack of reliable methods by which the DoD can convey
information routinely to employers of guard and reserve members. The
premise for this initiative is to establish an ongoing mechanism to
communicate information about the Department of Defense, and associated
agencies VA, and DoL regarding related plans, policies, mobilizations
and training issues for Reserve component members and employers. The
following topics were discussed:
Integrated Plan
Utilize broadcast, Web, print and outreach tools (events)
and key individuals to highlight NCESGR and model employers of
Guardsmen and Reservists.
Leverage Freedom Awards Ceremony, America Supports You,
Employer Boss Lifts and other contract resources.
Web/News Media Approaches
Use American Forces Press Service reporters to cover and
generate wire stories on events.
Wire stories can be distributed to more than 1,000
military publications and newspapers world-wide.
Deploy on-line survey to employers to gain additional
insights on their view, perspectives and support they wish.
Post key communications/messages to https://
www.Defenselink.mil which receives more than 65,000 unique hits per
day.
Broadcast
Use Pentagon Channel television crew to cover NCESGR
events.
Pentagon Channel can be viewed world-wide and is carried
on a number of commercial cable and satellite providers.
The broadcast piece will be available on https://
www.pentagonchannel.mil the day the piece airs on Pentagon Channel.
Event will be promoted on the Pentagon Channel crawler.
Determine other media possibilities outside government to
leverage NCESGR events.
Print/Outreach
NCESGR events will be included in regular outreach
products DoD updates for distribution and releases on the day of the
event.
Events will be posted to OSD-PA event calendar.
Story to be carried in the National Guard Family Readiness
Newsletter.
Leverage ``Hometown News'' local newspapers and work with
America Supports You, and grass roots organizations.
Use Legislative body to promote/support outreach
(Senators/Internal Legislative Affairs, DoD Legislative Affairs, and
White House Legislative Affairs staff).
Online Survey
Utilize/leverage all vehicles available to include DoL, recruiting
commands, if feasible, and others to launch survey to employers (sample
survey to be developed and will be short/succinct and will leverage
work of Freedom Awards recipients).
Outreach by Legislative Body/Media
Leverage internal resources--share NCESGR/DAB strategy,
ask for their input and reach out to those who have stepped forward to
bridge gaps and build relationships.
Feature stories in key publications and at key events
(with photos)--Start with leveraging recurring events such as, NCESGR's
annual Freedom Awards.
Charting a Way Ahead
Identify quick ways to deploy an online survey to
employers.
Obtain NCESGR resources to work with OSD-PA, DoD and DAB.
Identify concise survey topics to address with employers.
Define how success of media initiatives will be measured.
Work to engage support and involvement of House and Senate
members to promote NCESGR.
Dedicate internal NCESGR staff to support communications
if this initiative is a priority.
Define actions/dates to leverage existing DoD initiatives
i.e., America Supports You.
Routinely interface with DoL point person to leverage key
messages, outreach and DoD/DoL use of the Civilian Employer Information
database.
Commit aggressive support from DAB to move initiative
forward.
[[Page 60118]]
Mr. Nick Dawson and Mr. Marcus Bradshaw, Department of Labor (DoL),
Veterans Employment and Training Services (VETS)
Topic: Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
(USERRA)
A big compliance problem employers' face is a limited knowledge and
understanding about USERRA. NCESGR and DoL (VETS) are simultaneously
engaged in an ongoing concerted effort to help educate employers,
Guardsmen and Reservists about their rights and responsibilities. The
following information was discussed:
Who USERRA Covers
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act (USERRA) was enacted in 1994 under Title 38, U.S. Code, 4301-4334.
USERRA applies to virtually all employers (foreign and
domestic) in the United States and its Territories.
USERRA generally protects persons who perform, have
performed or apply to perform service in the uniformed services.
Service in the uniformed services includes voluntary and
involuntary service, both during wartime and in peacetime.
Since 2002, service by intermittent disaster response
personnel for FEMA and training to perform such service is considered
service in the uniformed services and is protected by USERRA.
Employment Rights
Employment rights consist of protections against
employment discrimination and employer retaliation.
Employers may not discriminate in employment,
reemployment, retention in employment, promotions or any benefit of
employment on the basis of a person's prior military service, current
military obligations, or an intent to join one of the uniformed
services.
Also, an employer may not take any adverse action to
retaliate against a person who has attempted to enforce his or her
rights under USERRA.
The law also prohibits retaliation against a person who
assists or testifies in an investigation or other enforcement action.
Such person is protected from retaliation even if he or she has no
military connection.
Reemployment Rights
If the returning employee meets the eligibility criteria,
he or she is entitled to prompt reemployment in accordance with what is
referred to as the ``escalator principle,'' which was first laid down
by the Supreme Court in the first reemployment rights case it decided,
in 1946.
The person is to be reemployed in the position he or she
would have attained if he or she had remained continuously employed
during the period of military service. If the period of military
service was for more than 90 days, the employer has the option to
reemploy the person in the ``escalator'' position or in another similar
position with like seniority, status and rate of pay. An employer is
required to make reasonable efforts to accommodate a disability
incurred or aggravated during the period of military service.
An employee who performs service of 31 or more days, must,
upon request of the employer, provide documentation (official orders or
DD-214) that shows the employee is eligible for reemployment. However,
if the documentation is not readily available or doesn't exist, the
employer must still reemploy the returning employee. The employer can
also contact the DoD (ESGR) or the employee's command to obtain
documentation.
The employer is excused from the obligation to reemploy if
the employer's circumstances have changed so as to make the
reemployment impossible or unreasonable. This would apply, for example,
if the employer has a bona fide layoff that would have included the
service member.
An employer is also excused from reemployment obligations
if the employee in question held a position that was to last for only a
brief non-recurrent period with no expectation that it would continue
indefinitely or for a significant period of time.
Benefits and Pensions
Upon reemployment, the employee is entitled to the
seniority and seniority-related benefits he or she had at the beginning
of the military plus whatever seniority and seniority benefits he or
she would have gained during the period of military service.
While absent to serve in the uniformed services, the
employee is considered on furlough or leave of absence and is entitled
to rights and benefits not based on seniority as are generally given to
similarly situated employees on other types leave of absence.
An employee and his or her dependents must be allowed
(upon request) to receive continued coverage under the employer's
health plan while performing military service. The period of coverage
is the lesser of 24 months from the beginning of the absence or the
actual period of the military leave of absence. If the period of
military service is 31 days or more, the employer may require the
employee to pay up to 102% of the full premium for continuation
coverage. The employee pays only the normal employee share, if any for
military service of 30 days or less. If the health plan is discontinued
during the period of service, it must be reinstated immediately upon
reemployment. There are no exclusions allowed, except for conditions
determined by VA to be service-connected.
Regarding pensions, an employee reemployed following
service must be given credit for the period of service for purposes of
benefits and vesting. If a plan is contributory, the employee must be
allowed to make up missed employee contributions, and the employer must
match those contributions in accordance with the plan's provisions.
Additional USERRA information can be found at https://
www.esgr.org and https://www.dol.gov/vets.
Bob Hollingsworth, Executive Director, ESGR
Topic: ESGR Outreach Status Brief
NCESGR continues to use employer outreach initiatives as a
strategic tool to communicate and gain support from employers of Guard
and Reserve. Through its outreach efforts, NCESGR has been able to
identify and successfully partner with industry leaders, military
organizations and government agencies.
ESGR State committees have also conducted proactive outreach to
known employers of Reserve component members through direct mail
marketing campaigns. Recently NCESGR Executive Director Bob
Hollingsworth presented a Civilian Employer Information (CEI) brief
presented to the Chairman's Reserve Conference, which was well
received. The following CEI information was discussed:
What We Know
Roughly \1/3\ of Select Reserve civilian employers are
employed in the public sector.
Just over \1/2\ of Select Reserve civilian employers
employ fewer than 100 total employees.
Eating and drinking establishments and medical offices are
the top two industries that employ Reserve component members.
Large firms such as, the U.S. Postal Service, Federal
Express, Sears Holdings Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Lockheed Martin
Corp., The Home Depot Inc., and Northrop Grumman Corp., employ hundreds
of Reservists each.
Police, truck drivers, correctional officers, technicians,
pilots, and flight engineers, bailiffs, nurses, automotive technicians
and retail sales persons comprise the top 10 occupations and
[[Page 60119]]
accounts for 26% of National Guardsmen and Reservists.
Even though NCESGR has pushed to insert the term
``employer'' into every topic, the leaders within the Pentagon are not
receptive and do not see the importance to include the employer in
topics as they do with ``family'' terminology.
Job placement, discrimination, harassment, and termination
protection are recurring concerns from year to year. This is noteworthy
because these areas are most likely to impact recruiting and retention.
Employer Feedback
Employers' lack of knowledge on USERRA is a barrier to
compliance.
Employers report that the greatest impact of mobilizations
on their company is operational.
Employers' biggest concerns are uncertainty over timing of
activations and the length of activations.
Future topics of discussion:
Does DoD consider the impact on the employers of Guardsmen
and Reservists and the impact to civilian employment of Guardsmen and
Reservists in the decisionmaking process?
Does DoD recognize employers as key partners in order to
field a viable Reserve component?
Do employers understand the significance of the change
from a Strategic Reserve to an Operational Reserve and how it will
impact them?
Do Guardsmen/Reservists understand the significance of the
change from a Strategic Reserve to an Operational Reserve and how it
will impact them?
What is the threshold of pain that employers are willing
to accept for Reserve component service?
What is the threshold of pain that Reservists/Guardsmen
are willing to tolerate to their civilian employment?
Tom Bush, Principal Deputy, Manpower and Personnel for the Office of
the Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs
Topic: ``Transitioning to an Operational Reserve''
More than 30 years have passed since the inception of the all
volunteer force in 1973. Historically, Reserve component members have
trained for mobilization and responded when called to duty to augment
the active forces during war or large scale conflicts--this is the
Strategic Reserve. But as forces were drawn down beginning in the mid
to late 1980s, the Reserve components were increasingly called upon to
support ongoing operational requirements. This began the transition to
an Operational Reserve. Today, the Guard and Reserve are more actively
engaged in operation than any time since the Korean War, supporting
both the Global War on Terror and daily operations.
As background, the Reserve structure has three major
categories: the Ready Reserve (which is comprised of the Selected
Reserve and Individual Ready Reserve), the Standby Reserve, and the
Retired Reserve. The category that is the most well known is the
Selected Reserve since this is the category that regularly performs
military duty (48 inactive duty periods or ``drills'' each year and two
weeks of annual training).
During the first Gulf War and since 9/11, the Operational
tempo of the Guard and Reserve has increased significantly. The annual
average of .09 million duty days served in 1987 to provide operational
support has been eclipsed 67 fold to 68.3 million duty days served in
2005 for operational support.
Volunteerism is a key attribute of the Operational
Reserve.
The long-standing rules governing the use of the Guard and
Reserve were designed for a Strategic Reserve--prepare for mobilization
(train) and mobilize. To support a continuum of service for an
Operational Reserve, the paradigm must shift:
--A ``Rheostat'' approach (each transition between duty statuses)
rather than a ``Circuit Breaker'' approach (performing only required
training, or being mobilized).
--Flexible system that supports any level of service.
--No more ``workarounds.''
--Easy to transition from civilian to military and back.
--Common pay system that accommodates varying levels of service is
required.
--Variable Reserve component pool optimizing assets with flexibility to
serve from zero to 365 days.
What's Needed To Transition to an Operational Reserve:
--Define an ``Operational Reserve.''
--Develop proper expectations.
--Develop new availability and service paradigm.
--Determine the operational role of the National Guard.
What is the New Guard and Reserve?
--Today's new Guard and Reserve has both a strategic and operational
role.
--How will the New Guard and Reserve Support Operational Missions?
The new Guard and Reserve will be organized, equipped and trained
to support operational military mission requirements to the same
standard as the Regular component. Individuals and units will be tasked
to prepare for and participate in missions, across the full spectrum of
operations, in a cyclic or periodic manner that provides predictability
for service members, their families and employers.
Comments from individual members:
Mr. Havenstein--He had received an e-mail from his
operations officer who recently attended an ESGR state committee
Bosslift. The employers who were in attendance were awestruck on how
much they learned about their employees while they performed weekend
drills. The operations officer wanted this feedback to be told to
NCESGR senior leadership ``that Bosslifts are truly important and
should continue to be supported.''
Mr. Havenstein--The ESGR state committee New Hampshire
Chair was recently at a concert of more than 6,000 people; when the
concert stopped for an intermission, the Chair was able to recognize
one of his Guardsmen at the concert. All 6,000 people stood and
applauded the service member.
Ms. Reed--Are the local Chamber of Commerces involved or
invited to participate in Bosslifts? Mr. Hollingsworth and Mr. Janes
both replied that the local Chambers are notified of Bosslifts, as well
as other ESGR state committee events.
Mr. Musser--There is a big push to institutionalize the
term ``employer'' within the Pentagon and as a member of the DAB, I
offer to assist in writing a plan and letter to make this initiative
happen.
Mr. Havenstein--Requested the DAB receive a copy of the
last Reserve component Chief briefings. Mr. Janes and Mr. Hollingsworth
stated they would have a copy of the last Reserve Chief presentation
package to the team before the end of the day. A copy of all Reserve
Chief briefings was delivered and distributed to the DAB team prior to
their departure.
Mr. Janes and Mr. Hollingsworth--The Pinnacle Advance
initiative is a phased direct marketing campaign being mailed to all
Guardsmen and Reservists. The process requests support from the service
member to provide employer information that promotes USERRA and
solicits a statement of support to their employer. The U.S. Army
Reserve (USAR) and the Army National Guard (ARNG) were the first
recipients of this initiative by NCESGR. Leaders for both the USAR and
ARNG are in full support of the Pinnacle Advance initiative. The next
Reserve components scheduled to
[[Page 60120]]
receive the Pinnacle Advance initiative (pending funding availability)
are: USMC Reserve, NAVY Reserve, Coast Guard Reserve, Air National
Guard, and the Air Force Reserve Command.
Mr. Havenstein, Ms. Naylor--It is important that unit
commanders develop a partnership with employers. Relationship building
may help with the angst of the unpredictability of some deployments.
Perhaps this initiative should be considered for all of NCESGR
programs, so that we can figure out how to best support it. Although
the unit commander's primary responsibility is to ensure their units
are combat ready, there still needs to be a directive or mandatory
training requirement that includes employer support. We should solicit
support and participation from employers and unit commanders to help
move the initiative forward.
Closing Comments from Chairman Janes:
Today's meeting did not have a quorum due to the last minute
cancellations of three individuals. All items discussed today that had
possible taskers will be brought up at the next meeting with a quorum
and will then be assigned as official taskers. Additionally, the agenda
for the next meeting will be structured to enable those absent to
present their slide materials.
Next meeting for the DAB is scheduled for February 2007.
Dated: October 5, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E6-16898 Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P