Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model 717-200 Airplanes, 60080-60083 [E6-16891]
Download as PDF
60080
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 197
Thursday, October 12, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26043; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–010–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Model 717–200 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
McDonnell Douglas Model 717–200
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require inspecting the power conversion
distribution unit (PCDU) to determine
its part number, and modifying certain
PCDUs. This proposed AD is prompted
by reports of failed PCDUs, the loss of
an electrical bus, and the presence of a
strong electrical burning odor in the
flight deck and forward cabin. We are
proposing this AD to prevent the loss of
an electrical bus due to a PCDU failure,
which could result in an abnormally
long time for all flight deck displays to
reconfigure, and consequent emergency
landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 27,
2006.
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• By fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach
Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846,
Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–
0024).
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2006–
26043; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005–NM–010–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Phan, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5342;
fax (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2006–26043; Directorate Identifier
2005–NM–010–AD’’ in the subject line
of your comments. We specifically
invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental,
and energy aspects of the proposed AD.
We will consider all comments
submitted by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You can
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you can visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
Discussion
We have received reports of failed
power conversion distribution units
(PCDUs). Such failures resulted, by
design, in the loss of an electrical bus
(both AC and DC power). Following the
loss of the electrical bus, the flight deck
displays took an abnormally long time
to reconfigure, and a strong electrical
burning odor was noted in the flight
deck and forward cabin. Investigation
revealed a short in the power supply of
the PCDU’s generator control unit. The
strong electrical burning odor in the
cabin has been attributed to a failed
PCDU on which a short condition can
result in overheating of the power
supply T1 transformer. Further, service
history has shown that an intermittent
loss of engine N2 speed signal to the
PCDU can result in a bus tie lockout
condition and automatic activation of
the emergency power. The loss of an
electrical bus due to a failed PCDU
could result in an abnormally long time
for all flight deck displays to
reconfigure, and consequent emergency
landing.
E:\FR\FM\12OCP1.SGM
12OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Relevant Service Information
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin
40EGS22P–24–10 specifies the
concurrent accomplishment of the
actions specified in the Hamilton
Sundstrand service bulletins listed in
the following table:
modifying the printed wiring board
(PWB) assembly A4 and installing new
PCDU firmware.
The Boeing service bulletin refers to
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin
40EGS22P–24–10, dated August 4, 2004,
as an additional source of service
information for the modification.
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 717–24A0028, Revision
1, dated December 20, 2005. The service
bulletin describes procedures for
modifying PCDUs having part number
762904E. The modification involves
60081
CONCURRENT SERVICE BULLETINS
Actions
Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin
Revision level
Reworking the transformer rectifier unit assembly (TRU) ....................
Reworking the W3 wiring harness assembly to install direct lead
wires to the TRU.
Adding a ground wire to the TRU transformer.
Adding an insulated spacer to the PCDU top cover.
Installing new PCDU 186 firmware .......................................................
40EGS22P–24–3 ..........................
Original .........
June 30, 2000.
40EGS22P–24–4 ..........................
40EGS22P–24–6 ..........................
40EGS22P–24–7 ..........................
40EGS22P–24–8 ..........................
Original .........
1 ...................
Original .........
Original .........
Original .........
April 26, 2001.
January 2, 2002.
July 25, 2002.
September 3, 2003.
September 4, 2003.
40EGS22P–24–9 ..........................
Original .........
November 19,
2003.
Installing new PCDU 186 firmware .......................................................
Modifying the top cover of the PCDU ...................................................
Modifying PWB assemblies A4 and A5 ................................................
Checking and applying torque seal to fasteners on the TRU assembly and to PCDU internal fasteners, if necessary.
Modifying PWB assembly A4 ................................................................
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. Therefore, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
identifying the part number of the PCDU
and accomplishing the applicable
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
Date
Costs of Compliance
There are about 137 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet
and 108 U.S.-registered airplanes. The
following table provides the estimated
costs for U.S. operators to comply with
this proposed AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PRIMARY ACTIONS
Boeing Service Bulletin
Work hours
Part number identification ................................................................................
Modification (717–24A0028) ............................................................................
Labor rate per
hour
1
12
$80
80
Cost per
airplane
Parts cost
$0
0
$80
960
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR CONCURRENT ACTIONS
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin
40EGS22P–24–3
40EGS22P–24–4
40EGS22P–24–6
40EGS22P–24–7
Work hours
...............................................
...............................................
...............................................
...............................................
40EGS22P–24–8 ...............................................
40EGS22P–24–9 ...............................................
6
3
3
1
Labor rate per
hour
..................
..................
..................
per PCDU
$80
80
80
80
10 ................
10 ................
80
80
Parts cost
$154, per airplane .............................................
0 .........................................................................
0 .........................................................................
10 per PCDU, maximum 3 PCDUs per airplane.
0 ........................................................................
0 ........................................................................
Cost per
airplane
$634
240
240
1 110
800
800
1 Maximum.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
E:\FR\FM\12OCP1.SGM
12OCP1
60082
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
electrical bus due to a PCDU failure, which
could result in an abnormally long time for
all flight deck displays to reconfigure, and
consequent emergency landing.
The Proposed Amendment
Compliance
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Identification of PCDU Part Number
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2006–
26043; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–
010–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this AD
action by November 27, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all McDonnell
Douglas Model 717–200 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of
failed power conversion distribution units
(PCDUs), the loss of an electrical bus, and the
presence of a strong electrical burning odor
in the flight deck and forward cabin. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the loss of an
(f) Within 20 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect the PCDU to
determine its part number. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of this inspection if the part number can
be conclusively determined from that review.
(1) If the part number is 762904E, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD.
(2) If the part number is not 762904E, no
further work is required by this AD.
Modification
(g) Within 20 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the PCDU in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 717–24A0028, Revision 1, dated
December 20, 2005. A modification done
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 717–24A0028, dated November 24,
2004, is acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph.
Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717–
24A0028 refers to Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin 40EGS22P–24–10, Revision
1, dated May 11, 2005, as an additional
source of service information for the
modification.
Concurrent Requirements
(h) Before or concurrently with the
modification required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, do the applicable actions specified in
Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1.—CONCURRENT SERVICE BULLETINS
Do the following—
In accordance with Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin—
Rework the transformer rectifier unit assembly (TRU) ...................................................................
Rework the W3 wiring harness assembly to install direct lead wires to the TRU.
Add a ground wire to the TRU transformer.
Add an insulated spacer to the PCDU top cover.
Install new PCDU 186 firmware ......................................................................................................
40EGS22P–24–3, dated June 30, 2000.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Install new PCDU 186 firmware ......................................................................................................
Modify the top cover of the PCDU ..................................................................................................
Modify printed wiring board (PWB) assemblies A4 and A5 ............................................................
Check and apply torque seal to fasteners on the TRU assembly and to PCDU internal fasteners, as applicable.
Modify the PWB assembly A4 .........................................................................................................
Credit for Accomplishment of Earlier
Service Bulletin
with the corresponding requirements of
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(i) Installation of new PCDU 186 firmware
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin 40EGS22P–24–4, dated
April 26, 2001, is acceptable for compliance
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
40EGS22P–24–4,
2, 2002.
40EGS22P–24–6,
40EGS22P–24–7,
40EGS22P–24–8,
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dated July 25, 2002.
dated September 3, 2003.
dated September 4, 2003.
40EGS22P–24–9, dated November 19, 2003.
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(j) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
PO 00000
Revision 1, dated January
E:\FR\FM\12OCP1.SGM
12OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
3, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–16891 Filed 10–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26046; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–172–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier Model CL–600–
2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require inspecting for discrepancies of
the activation mechanism of certain
chemical oxygen generators, and
corrective action if necessary. This
proposed AD results from several
incidents, on certain airplane models, of
incorrect installation of the release pin
into the safety pin hole of the activation
mechanism of the chemical oxygen
generator; this resulted in failure to
activate the chemical oxygen generator
when required. A separate incident
occurred on a different airplane model
during deployment of the cabin oxygen
system, which resulted in failure of the
release pin to activate the oxygen
generator at a flight attendant station.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
failure of the activation mechanism of
the chemical oxygen generator, which
could result in the unavailability of
supplemental oxygen and possible
incapacitation of passengers and cabin
crew during an in-flight decompression.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 13,
2006.
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Oct 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087,
Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec
H3C 3G9, Canada, for service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Parillo, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
(516) 228–7305; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–26046; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–172–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60083
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain
Bombardier Model CL–600–2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. TCCA advises that several
incidents, on certain Bombardier
airplane models, of incorrect
installation of the release pin into the
safety pin hole of the activation
mechanism occurred in certain
chemical oxygen generators; this
resulted in failure to activate the
chemical oxygen generators when
required. A separate incident occurred
on a Model CL–600–2C10 airplane
during deployment of the cabin oxygen
system, due to failure of the release pin
to activate the oxygen generator at a
flight attendant station. Investigation
revealed that the release pin was not
aligned with the lanyard tube in the
mask container module, preventing
activation of the oxygen generator. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in the unavailability of supplemental
oxygen and possible incapacitation of
passengers and cabin crew during an inflight decompression.
The design of the activation
mechanism of the oxygen generator of
the flight attendant and passenger
service units on certain Model CL–600–
2B19 airplanes is similar to the design
of the activation mechanism installed
on certain Model CL–600–2C10
airplanes. Therefore, all of these models
may be subject to the identified unsafe
condition. Further rulemaking is
currently in process to address this
E:\FR\FM\12OCP1.SGM
12OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 197 (Thursday, October 12, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60080-60083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16891]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 197 / Thursday, October 12, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 60080]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26043; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model 717-200
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all McDonnell Douglas Model 717-200 airplanes. This proposed AD
would require inspecting the power conversion distribution unit (PCDU)
to determine its part number, and modifying certain PCDUs. This
proposed AD is prompted by reports of failed PCDUs, the loss of an
electrical bus, and the presence of a strong electrical burning odor in
the flight deck and forward cabin. We are proposing this AD to prevent
the loss of an electrical bus due to a PCDU failure, which could result
in an abnormally long time for all flight deck displays to reconfigure,
and consequent emergency landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 27,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
By fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This
docket number is FAA-2006-26043; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005-NM-010-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Phan, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5342; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-26043;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-010-AD'' in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You can review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
Discussion
We have received reports of failed power conversion distribution
units (PCDUs). Such failures resulted, by design, in the loss of an
electrical bus (both AC and DC power). Following the loss of the
electrical bus, the flight deck displays took an abnormally long time
to reconfigure, and a strong electrical burning odor was noted in the
flight deck and forward cabin. Investigation revealed a short in the
power supply of the PCDU's generator control unit. The strong
electrical burning odor in the cabin has been attributed to a failed
PCDU on which a short condition can result in overheating of the power
supply T1 transformer. Further, service history has shown that an
intermittent loss of engine N2 speed signal to the PCDU can result in a
bus tie lockout condition and automatic activation of the emergency
power. The loss of an electrical bus due to a failed PCDU could result
in an abnormally long time for all flight deck displays to reconfigure,
and consequent emergency landing.
[[Page 60081]]
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-24A0028,
Revision 1, dated December 20, 2005. The service bulletin describes
procedures for modifying PCDUs having part number 762904E. The
modification involves modifying the printed wiring board (PWB) assembly
A4 and installing new PCDU firmware.
The Boeing service bulletin refers to Hamilton Sundstrand Service
Bulletin 40EGS22P-24-10, dated August 4, 2004, as an additional source
of service information for the modification.
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin 40EGS22P-24-10 specifies the
concurrent accomplishment of the actions specified in the Hamilton
Sundstrand service bulletins listed in the following table:
Concurrent Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamilton Sundstrand
Actions Service Bulletin Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reworking the transformer 40EGS22P-24-3........ Original.............. June 30, 2000.
rectifier unit assembly (TRU).
Reworking the W3 wiring harness
assembly to install direct lead
wires to the TRU.
Adding a ground wire to the TRU
transformer.
Adding an insulated spacer to the
PCDU top cover.
Installing new PCDU 186 firmware.. 40EGS22P-24-4........ Original.............. April 26, 2001.
1..................... January 2, 2002.
Installing new PCDU 186 firmware.. 40EGS22P-24-6........ Original.............. July 25, 2002.
Modifying the top cover of the 40EGS22P-24-7........ Original.............. September 3, 2003.
PCDU.
Modifying PWB assemblies A4 and A5 40EGS22P-24-8........ Original.............. September 4, 2003.
Checking and applying torque seal
to fasteners on the TRU assembly
and to PCDU internal fasteners,
if necessary.
Modifying PWB assembly A4......... 40EGS22P-24-9........ Original.............. November 19, 2003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which
would require identifying the part number of the PCDU and accomplishing
the applicable actions specified in the service information described
previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 137 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet and 108 U.S.-registered airplanes. The following table
provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this
proposed AD.
Estimated Costs for Primary Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor rate per Cost per
Boeing Service Bulletin Work hours hour Parts cost airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part number identification...................... 1 $80 $0 $80
Modification (717-24A0028)...................... 12 80 0 960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Costs for Concurrent Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Labor rate per Cost per
Bulletin Work hours hour Parts cost airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40EGS22P-24-3...................... 6..................... $80 $154, per airplane.... $634
40EGS22P-24-4...................... 3..................... 80 0..................... 240
40EGS22P-24-6...................... 3..................... 80 0..................... 240
40EGS22P-24-7...................... 1 per PCDU............ 80 10 per PCDU, maximum 3 \1\ 110
PCDUs per airplane.
40EGS22P-24-8...................... 10.................... 80 0..................... 800
40EGS22P-24-9...................... 10.................... 80 0..................... 800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Maximum.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
[[Page 60082]]
the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section
44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges
the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2006-26043; Directorate Identifier
2005-NM-010-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this AD action by November 27, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model 717-200
airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of failed power conversion
distribution units (PCDUs), the loss of an electrical bus, and the
presence of a strong electrical burning odor in the flight deck and
forward cabin. We are issuing this AD to prevent the loss of an
electrical bus due to a PCDU failure, which could result in an
abnormally long time for all flight deck displays to reconfigure,
and consequent emergency landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Identification of PCDU Part Number
(f) Within 20 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the PCDU to determine its part number. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
part number can be conclusively determined from that review.
(1) If the part number is 762904E, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(2) If the part number is not 762904E, no further work is
required by this AD.
Modification
(g) Within 20 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the PCDU in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-
24A0028, Revision 1, dated December 20, 2005. A modification done
before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 717-24A0028, dated November 24, 2004, is acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.
Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-24A0028 refers to
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletin 40EGS22P-24-10, Revision 1,
dated May 11, 2005, as an additional source of service information
for the modification.
Concurrent Requirements
(h) Before or concurrently with the modification required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, do the applicable actions specified in
Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1.--Concurrent Service Bulletins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Hamilton
Do the following-- Sundstrand Service
Bulletin--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rework the transformer rectifier unit 40EGS22P-24-3, dated June
assembly (TRU). 30, 2000.
Rework the W3 wiring harness assembly to
install direct lead wires to the TRU.
Add a ground wire to the TRU transformer.
Add an insulated spacer to the PCDU top
cover.
Install new PCDU 186 firmware.............. 40EGS22P-24-4, Revision 1,
dated January 2, 2002.
Install new PCDU 186 firmware.............. 40EGS22P-24-6, dated July
25, 2002.
Modify the top cover of the PCDU........... 40EGS22P-24-7, dated
September 3, 2003.
Modify printed wiring board (PWB) 40EGS22P-24-8, dated
assemblies A4 and A5. September 4, 2003.
Check and apply torque seal to fasteners on
the TRU assembly and to PCDU internal
fasteners, as applicable.
Modify the PWB assembly A4................. 40EGS22P-24-9, dated
November 19, 2003.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Credit for Accomplishment of Earlier Service Bulletin
(i) Installation of new PCDU 186 firmware before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Hamilton Sundstrand Service
Bulletin 40EGS22P-24-4, dated April 26, 2001, is acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding requirements of paragraph (h) of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
[[Page 60083]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 3, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-16891 Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P