Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Correction, 59383-59385 [E6-16700]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
it has been determined that the
promulgation of operating regulations
for drawbridges are categorically
excluded.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
4. Section 117.733 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (k) as paragraph
(m) and adding a new paragraph (k) to
read as follows:
I
§ 117.733 New Jersey Intracoastal
Waterway.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) The draw of Two-Mile Bridge,
mile 112.2, across Middle Thorofare in
Wildwood Crest, shall open on signal;
except from 9:15 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on
the fourth Sunday in March of every
year, the draw need not open for
vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a
religious holiday, the draw need not
open for vessels from 9:15 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on the third Sunday of March of
every year.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 117.757
2. Section 117.720 is revised by
adding a new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
I
Great Channel.
*
*
*
*
(c) From 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the
fourth Sunday in March of every year,
Jkt 211001
The draw of the Grassy Sound
Channel Bridge, mile 1.0 in Middle
Township, shall open on signal from 6
a.m. to 8 p.m. from May 15 through
September 30. From 9:15 a.m. to 2:30
p.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of
every year, the draw need not open for
vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a
religious holiday, the draw need not
open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the
third Sunday of March of every year.
Two hours advance notice is required
for all other openings by calling (609)
368–4591.
[Redesignated]
5. Redesignate § 117.757 as § 117.758.
6. Add new § 117.757 to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
15:57 Oct 06, 2006
Grassy Sound Channel.
I
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
§ 117.721
I
I
*
3. § 117.721 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 117.757
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
§ 117.720
the draw need not open for vessels. If
the fourth Sunday falls on a religious
holiday, the draw need not open from
9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the third
Sunday of March of every year.
Townsend Inlet.
The draw of Townsend Inlet Bridge,
mile 0.3 in Avalon, shall open on signal;
except from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on
the fourth Sunday in March of every
year, the draw need not open for
vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a
religious holiday, the draw need not
open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the
third Sunday of March of every year.
Dated: September 18, 2006.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–16426 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59383
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2005–MO–0005; FRL–
8228–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On July 11, 2006, EPA
published a final rule approving
revisions to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP). In the July
11, 2006, rule EPA inadvertently
included an incorrect state effective date
for this rule and omitted part of the
information in the explanation column
of the Constructions Permits Required
rule. We are making a correction to the
state effective date and to the
explanation in this document.
DATES: This action is effective October
10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551–7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
On July 11, 2006, EPA published a
SIP revision for Missouri that included
a revision to rule 10 CSR 10–6.060. In
§ 52.1320(c), the portion of the table
referencing Missouri Chapter 6, the
State Effective Date should have been
December 30, 2004, and the Explanation
column for this rule should have
included the statement ‘‘This revision
incorporates by reference elements of
EPA’s NSR reform rule published
December 31, 2002. Provisions of the
incorporated reform rule relating to the
Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution
Control Projects, and exemption from
record keeping provisions for certain
sources using the actual-to-projectedactual emissions projections test are not
SIP approved. This revision also
incorporates by reference the other
provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 as in effect
on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any
conflicting provisions in the Missouri
rule. Section 9, pertaining to hazardous
air pollutants, is not SIP approved.’’
This statement was included in the
Explanation column of the June 27,
2006 (71 FR 36489) revision to this rule.
Therefore, in this correction notice we
are adding this information to the table
for Chapter 6.
E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM
10OCR1
59384
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedures are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is such good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting our identification of the
effective date of a state rule and
reinserting an explanation which was
included in a previous action. Thus,
notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). Because the agency has made
a good cause finding that this action is
not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act, it is not subject to the
regulatory flexibility provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this rule merely
corrects an incorrect citation in a
previous action, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
For the same reason, this rule also
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely corrects a citation in a State rule
in a previous action implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act (CAA). This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, our
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), we have no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (CRA),
5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. As
stated previously, we made such a good
cause finding, including the reasons
therefore and established an effective
date of October 10, 2006. We will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the United
States Senate, the United States House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This correction to the Missouri
SIP table is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 et seq (2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate mater, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 27, 2006.
John Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended
under Chapter 6 by revising the entry
for rule ‘‘10–6.060’’ to read as follows:
I
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM
10OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
59385
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued
Missouri citation
*
*
10–6.060 ......
*
*
*
*
*
12/30/2004
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 65
[Docket No. FEMA–B–7466]
Changes in Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Homeland Security,
Mitigation Division.
ACTION: Interim rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim rule lists
communities where modification of the
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood
Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New
flood insurance premium rates will be
calculated from the modified BFEs for
new buildings and their contents.
DATES: These modified BFEs are
currently in effect on the dates listed in
the table below and revise the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps in effect prior to
this determination for the listed
communities.
From the date of the second
publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any
person has ninety (90) days in which to
request through the community that the
Mitigation Division Director reconsider
15:57 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Explanation
*
10/10/2006 [insert FR
page number where the
document begins].
*
[FR Doc. E6–16700 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
EPA approval date
*
Construction Permits Required..
*
*
State effective
date
Title
*
This revision incorporates by reference elements of
EPA’s NSR reform rule published December 31,
2002. Provisions of the incorporated reform rule relating to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption from record keeping
provisions for certain sources using the actual-toprojected-actual emissions projections test are not
SIP approved. This revision also incorporates by
reference the other provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 as
in effect on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any
conflicting provisions in the Missouri rule. We are
conditionally approving references to 10 CSR 10–
6.062 contained in the last sentence of Section
(1)(B) and all of section (1)(D). Section 9, pertaining to hazardous air pollutants, is not SIP approved.
*
the changes. The modified BFEs may be
changed during the 90-day period.
ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William R. Blanton Jr., Engineering
Management Section, Mitigation
Division, FEMA, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule.
However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community
where the modified BFE determinations
are available for inspection is provided.
Any request for reconsideration must
be based on knowledge of changed
conditions or new scientific or technical
data.
The modifications are made pursuant
to section 201 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105,
and are in accordance with the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown
and must be used for all new policies
and renewals.
The modified BFEs are the basis for
the floodplain management measures
that the community is required to either
adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or
to remain qualified for participation in
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
These modified BFEs, together with
the floodplain management criteria
required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the
minimum that are required. They
should not be construed to mean that
the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own, or
pursuant to policies established by the
other Federal, State, or regional entities.
The changes BFEs are in accordance
with 44 CFR 65.4.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This rule is categorically excluded from
the requirements of 44 CFR Part 10,
Environmental Consideration. No
environmental impact assessment has
been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Mitigation Division Director for the
FEMA certifies that this rule is exempt
from the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because modified BFEs
are required by the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105,
and are required to maintain community
eligibility in the NFIP. No regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared.
Regulatory Classification. This
interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of
Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule involves no policies that have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132, Federalism.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule meets the applicable
E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM
10OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59383-59385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16700]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2005-MO-0005; FRL-8228-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 11, 2006, EPA published a final rule approving
revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). In the July
11, 2006, rule EPA inadvertently included an incorrect state effective
date for this rule and omitted part of the information in the
explanation column of the Constructions Permits Required rule. We are
making a correction to the state effective date and to the explanation
in this document.
DATES: This action is effective October 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551-7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
On July 11, 2006, EPA published a SIP revision for Missouri that
included a revision to rule 10 CSR 10-6.060. In Sec. 52.1320(c), the
portion of the table referencing Missouri Chapter 6, the State
Effective Date should have been December 30, 2004, and the Explanation
column for this rule should have included the statement ``This revision
incorporates by reference elements of EPA's NSR reform rule published
December 31, 2002. Provisions of the incorporated reform rule relating
to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption
from record keeping provisions for certain sources using the actual-to-
projected-actual emissions projections test are not SIP approved. This
revision also incorporates by reference the other provisions of 40 CFR
52.21 as in effect on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any conflicting
provisions in the Missouri rule. Section 9, pertaining to hazardous air
pollutants, is not SIP approved.'' This statement was included in the
Explanation column of the June 27, 2006 (71 FR 36489) revision to this
rule. Therefore, in this correction notice we are adding this
information to the table for Chapter 6.
[[Page 59384]]
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have
determined that there is such good cause for making today's rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because we are
merely correcting our identification of the effective date of a state
rule and reinserting an explanation which was included in a previous
action. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). Because the
agency has made a good cause finding that this action is not subject to
notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures
Act, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
merely corrects an incorrect citation in a previous action, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4).
For the same reason, this rule also does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely corrects a citation in a
State rule in a previous action implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act (CAA). This rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, our role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in
the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS), we have no authority to disapprove
a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent
with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use
VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. As stated
previously, we made such a good cause finding, including the reasons
therefore and established an effective date of October 10, 2006. We
will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the United States Senate, the United States House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to
the Missouri SIP table is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804 et seq (2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate mater, reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 27, 2006.
John Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 6 by revising
the entry for rule ``10-6.060'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59385]]
* * * * * * *
10-6.060.............. Construction Permits 12/30/2004 10/10/2006 [insert FR This revision incorporates
Required.. page number where by reference elements of
the document begins]. EPA's NSR reform rule
published December 31,
2002. Provisions of the
incorporated reform rule
relating to the Clean
Unit Exemption, Pollution
Control Projects, and
exemption from record
keeping provisions for
certain sources using the
actual-to-projected-
actual emissions
projections test are not
SIP approved. This
revision also
incorporates by reference
the other provisions of
40 CFR 52.21 as in effect
on July 1, 2003, which
supersedes any
conflicting provisions in
the Missouri rule. We are
conditionally approving
references to 10 CSR 10-
6.062 contained in the
last sentence of Section
(1)(B) and all of section
(1)(D). Section 9,
pertaining to hazardous
air pollutants, is not
SIP approved.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-16700 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
