Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Correction, 59383-59385 [E6-16700]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321– 4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation because it has been determined that the promulgation of operating regulations for drawbridges are categorically excluded. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. I For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 as follows: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES 4. Section 117.733 is amended by redesignating paragraph (k) as paragraph (m) and adding a new paragraph (k) to read as follows: I § 117.733 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway. * * * * * (k) The draw of Two-Mile Bridge, mile 112.2, across Middle Thorofare in Wildwood Crest, shall open on signal; except from 9:15 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of every year, the draw need not open for vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the draw need not open for vessels from 9:15 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on the third Sunday of March of every year. * * * * * § 117.757 2. Section 117.720 is revised by adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows: I Great Channel. * * * * (c) From 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of every year, Jkt 211001 The draw of the Grassy Sound Channel Bridge, mile 1.0 in Middle Township, shall open on signal from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. from May 15 through September 30. From 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of every year, the draw need not open for vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the draw need not open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the third Sunday of March of every year. Two hours advance notice is required for all other openings by calling (609) 368–4591. [Redesignated] 5. Redesignate § 117.757 as § 117.758. 6. Add new § 117.757 to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat. 5039. 15:57 Oct 06, 2006 Grassy Sound Channel. I 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: VerDate Aug<31>2005 § 117.721 I I * 3. § 117.721 is revised to read as follows: I § 117.757 PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS § 117.720 the draw need not open for vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the draw need not open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the third Sunday of March of every year. Townsend Inlet. The draw of Townsend Inlet Bridge, mile 0.3 in Avalon, shall open on signal; except from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of every year, the draw need not open for vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the draw need not open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the third Sunday of March of every year. Dated: September 18, 2006. L.L. Hereth, Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. E6–16426 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 59383 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2005–MO–0005; FRL– 8228–9] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Correction Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: On July 11, 2006, EPA published a final rule approving revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). In the July 11, 2006, rule EPA inadvertently included an incorrect state effective date for this rule and omitted part of the information in the explanation column of the Constructions Permits Required rule. We are making a correction to the state effective date and to the explanation in this document. DATES: This action is effective October 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551–7942, or by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. On July 11, 2006, EPA published a SIP revision for Missouri that included a revision to rule 10 CSR 10–6.060. In § 52.1320(c), the portion of the table referencing Missouri Chapter 6, the State Effective Date should have been December 30, 2004, and the Explanation column for this rule should have included the statement ‘‘This revision incorporates by reference elements of EPA’s NSR reform rule published December 31, 2002. Provisions of the incorporated reform rule relating to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption from record keeping provisions for certain sources using the actual-to-projectedactual emissions projections test are not SIP approved. This revision also incorporates by reference the other provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 as in effect on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any conflicting provisions in the Missouri rule. Section 9, pertaining to hazardous air pollutants, is not SIP approved.’’ This statement was included in the Explanation column of the June 27, 2006 (71 FR 36489) revision to this rule. Therefore, in this correction notice we are adding this information to the table for Chapter 6. E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1 59384 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that there is such good cause for making today’s rule final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting our identification of the effective date of a state rule and reinserting an explanation which was included in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). Because the agency has made a good cause finding that this action is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule merely corrects an incorrect citation in a previous action, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For the same reason, this rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely corrects a citation in a State rule in a previous action implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act (CAA). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP submissions, our role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), we have no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This determination must be supported by a brief statement. As stated previously, we made such a good cause finding, including the reasons therefore and established an effective date of October 10, 2006. We will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to the Missouri SIP table is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 et seq (2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate mater, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: September 27, 2006. John Askew, Regional Administrator, Region 7. Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: I PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA—Missouri 2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 6 by revising the entry for rule ‘‘10–6.060’’ to read as follows: I § 52.1320 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS Missouri citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES * * * * * * * Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 Oct 06, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 59385 EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued Missouri citation * * 10–6.060 ...... * * * * * 12/30/2004 * * BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 65 [Docket No. FEMA–B–7466] Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, Mitigation Division. ACTION: Interim rule. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their contents. DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps in effect prior to this determination for the listed communities. From the date of the second publication of these changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in which to request through the community that the Mitigation Division Director reconsider 15:57 Oct 06, 2006 Jkt 211001 Explanation * 10/10/2006 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * [FR Doc. E6–16700 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] VerDate Aug<31>2005 EPA approval date * Construction Permits Required.. * * State effective date Title * This revision incorporates by reference elements of EPA’s NSR reform rule published December 31, 2002. Provisions of the incorporated reform rule relating to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption from record keeping provisions for certain sources using the actual-toprojected-actual emissions projections test are not SIP approved. This revision also incorporates by reference the other provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 as in effect on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any conflicting provisions in the Missouri rule. We are conditionally approving references to 10 CSR 10– 6.062 contained in the last sentence of Section (1)(B) and all of section (1)(D). Section 9, pertaining to hazardous air pollutants, is not SIP approved. * the changes. The modified BFEs may be changed during the 90-day period. ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton Jr., Engineering Management Section, Mitigation Division, FEMA, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE determinations are available for inspection is provided. Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of changed conditions or new scientific or technical data. The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65. For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals. The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that the community is required to either adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * * These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established by the other Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes BFEs are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4. National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR Part 10, Environmental Consideration. No environmental impact assessment has been prepared. Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Mitigation Division Director for the FEMA certifies that this rule is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act because modified BFEs are required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are required to maintain community eligibility in the NFIP. No regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared. Regulatory Classification. This interim rule is not a significant regulatory action under the criteria of Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735. Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This rule involves no policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132, Federalism. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule meets the applicable E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59383-59385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16700]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2005-MO-0005; FRL-8228-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of 
Missouri; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 11, 2006, EPA published a final rule approving 
revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). In the July 
11, 2006, rule EPA inadvertently included an incorrect state effective 
date for this rule and omitted part of the information in the 
explanation column of the Constructions Permits Required rule. We are 
making a correction to the state effective date and to the explanation 
in this document.

DATES: This action is effective October 10, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551-7942, or 
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
    On July 11, 2006, EPA published a SIP revision for Missouri that 
included a revision to rule 10 CSR 10-6.060. In Sec.  52.1320(c), the 
portion of the table referencing Missouri Chapter 6, the State 
Effective Date should have been December 30, 2004, and the Explanation 
column for this rule should have included the statement ``This revision 
incorporates by reference elements of EPA's NSR reform rule published 
December 31, 2002. Provisions of the incorporated reform rule relating 
to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption 
from record keeping provisions for certain sources using the actual-to-
projected-actual emissions projections test are not SIP approved. This 
revision also incorporates by reference the other provisions of 40 CFR 
52.21 as in effect on July 1, 2003, which supersedes any conflicting 
provisions in the Missouri rule. Section 9, pertaining to hazardous air 
pollutants, is not SIP approved.'' This statement was included in the 
Explanation column of the June 27, 2006 (71 FR 36489) revision to this 
rule. Therefore, in this correction notice we are adding this 
information to the table for Chapter 6.

[[Page 59384]]

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that 
notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or 
contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without 
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have 
determined that there is such good cause for making today's rule final 
without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because we are 
merely correcting our identification of the effective date of a state 
rule and reinserting an explanation which was included in a previous 
action. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. We find that 
this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). Because the 
agency has made a good cause finding that this action is not subject to 
notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures 
Act, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility provisions of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule 
merely corrects an incorrect citation in a previous action, it does not 
contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(Pub. L. 104-4).
    For the same reason, this rule also does not have a substantial 
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000). This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely corrects a citation in a 
State rule in a previous action implementing a Federal standard, and 
does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act (CAA). This rule also 
is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, our role is to approve State choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in 
the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use 
voluntary consensus standards (VCS), we have no authority to disapprove 
a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent 
with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use 
VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the 
provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection 
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added 
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to 
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the 
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is 
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This 
determination must be supported by a brief statement. As stated 
previously, we made such a good cause finding, including the reasons 
therefore and established an effective date of October 10, 2006. We 
will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the United States Senate, the United States House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to 
the Missouri SIP table is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804 et seq (2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate mater, reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic 
compounds.

    Dated: September 27, 2006.
John Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 6 by revising 
the entry for rule ``10-6.060'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    State
   Missouri citation            Title          effective date    EPA approval date            Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                      Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
[[Page 59385]]

 
                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.060..............  Construction Permits       12/30/2004  10/10/2006 [insert FR  This revision incorporates
                         Required..                             page number where      by reference elements of
                                                                the document begins].  EPA's NSR reform rule
                                                                                       published December 31,
                                                                                       2002. Provisions of the
                                                                                       incorporated reform rule
                                                                                       relating to the Clean
                                                                                       Unit Exemption, Pollution
                                                                                       Control Projects, and
                                                                                       exemption from record
                                                                                       keeping provisions for
                                                                                       certain sources using the
                                                                                       actual-to-projected-
                                                                                       actual emissions
                                                                                       projections test are not
                                                                                       SIP approved. This
                                                                                       revision also
                                                                                       incorporates by reference
                                                                                       the other provisions of
                                                                                       40 CFR 52.21 as in effect
                                                                                       on July 1, 2003, which
                                                                                       supersedes any
                                                                                       conflicting provisions in
                                                                                       the Missouri rule. We are
                                                                                       conditionally approving
                                                                                       references to 10 CSR 10-
                                                                                       6.062 contained in the
                                                                                       last sentence of Section
                                                                                       (1)(B) and all of section
                                                                                       (1)(D). Section 9,
                                                                                       pertaining to hazardous
                                                                                       air pollutants, is not
                                                                                       SIP approved.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E6-16700 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P