NHTSA's Activities Under the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1998 Global Agreement, 59582-59587 [E6-16681]
Download as PDF
59582
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2003–14395, Notice 3]
NHTSA’s Activities Under the United
Nations Economic Commission for
Europe 1998 Global Agreement
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DoT.
ACTION: Notice of activities under the
1998 Global Agreement and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NHTSA is publishing this
notice to inform the public of the
schedule of upcoming meetings of the
World Forum for Harmonization of
Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and its
working parties of experts for the
remainder of calendar year 2006 and the
tentative schedule for calendar year
2007. Further, this notice informs the
public about the status of activities
under the Program of Work of the 1998
Global Agreement and requests
comments on various aspects of these
activities. Specifically, this notice seeks
comment on the recommended Global
Technical Regulation (GTR) on
motorcycle brake systems that was
referred by the Working Party on Brakes
and Running Gear (GRRF) to the
Executive Committee of the 1998 Global
Agreement (AC.3) for a vote at the 140th
session of WP.29 in November 2006.
Publication of this information is in
accordance with NHTSA’s Statement of
Policy regarding Agency Policy Goals
and Public Participation in the
Implementation of the 1998 Global
Agreement on Global Technical
Regulations.
Written comments may be
submitted to this agency and must be
received within 30 days of publication
of this notice.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments in writing to: Docket
Management, Room PL–401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Alternatively, you may submit
your comments electronically by logging
onto the Dockets Management System
Web site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help & Information’’ or ‘‘Help/Info’’ to
view instructions for filing your
comments electronically. Regardless of
how you submit your comments, you
should mention the docket number of
this document. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://dms.dot.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading under
Request for Comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Mr.
Ezana Wondimneh, Division Chief,
International Policy and Harmonization
(NVS–133), National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590;
phone number (202) 366–0846, fax
number (202) 493–2290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. List of meetings of WP.29 and its working
parties of experts
III. Status of activities under the Program of
Work of the 1998 Global Agreement
a. Status of Established GTRs under the
1998 Global Agreement
b. Formal proposals for the development of
GTRs submitted by contracting parties
based on the Program of Work
c. Status of proposed GTRs under the 1998
Global Agreement
1. Motorcycle Brake Systems
2. Installation of Light and Light-Signaling
Devices
3. Safety Glazing
4. Pedestrian Safety
5. Head Restraints
6. Other GTRs
d. Specific Resolutions under the 1998
Agreement
e. Compendium of Candidate GTRs
IV. Request for Comments
V. Privacy Act
I. Background
On August 23, 2000, NHTSA
published in the Federal Register (65
FR 51236) a statement of policy
regarding the agency’s policy goals and
public participation in the
implementation of the 1998 Global
Agreement, indicating that each
calendar year the agency would provide
a list of scheduled meetings of the
World Forum for Harmonization of
Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the
working parties of experts, as well as
meetings of the Executive Committee of
the 1998 Global Agreement (AC.3).
Further, in that policy statement, the
agency stated that it would keep the
public informed about a program of
work under the Agreement (i.e., agreed
subjects for which Global Technical
Regulations [GTR] should be developed)
as well as a list of candidate GTRs that
have been formally proposed by a
contracting party and referred to a
working party of experts, including draft
GTRs that have been developed and
referred by a working party of experts to
AC.3 for establishment under the
Agreement.
Through a series of Federal Register
notices published between July 2000
and October 2004 (65 FR 44565), (66 FR
4893), (68 FR 5333) (69 FR 60460), the
agency notified the public about status
of activities under the 1998 Global
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agreement and sought comments on
various issues and proposals. In the
most recent notice (69 FR 60460), the
agency discussed the status of activities
under the Program of Work for the 1998
Global Agreement, which was formally
adopted by WP.29 at its March 2002
Session, made available and sought
comment on formal proposals for GTRs
submitted by contracting parties as well
as recommended GTRs.
II. List of Meetings of WP.29 and Its
Working Parties of Experts
The following lists contain meetings
of WP.29 and its working parties of
experts for the remainder of calendar
year 2006 and for calendar year 2007.
The meeting dates for 2007 are subject
to confirmation by the Inland Transport
Committee of the United Nations
Economic Commission for Europe.1
However, the agency does not anticipate
any changes to the schedule. In
addition, working parties of experts may
schedule, if necessary, informal
meetings in addition to their regularly
scheduled ones in order to address
technical matters specific to GTRs under
consideration. The formation of these
groups, and their timing, are
recommended by the sponsor and chair
of the group and are agreed to by WP.29
and AC.3. The schedule and place of
meetings are made available to
interested parties in proposals and
periodic reports which are posted on the
Web site of WP.29.
Schedule of Meetings of WP.29 and Its
Working Parties of Experts 2006
October
2–6 Working Party on Lighting and
Light Signaling (GRE) (57th session)
17–20 Working Party on General
Safety Provisions (GRSG) (91st
session)
November
13 Administrative Committee for the
Coordination of Work (WP.2/AC.2)
(92nd session)
14–17 World Forum for
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
(WP.29) (140th session) and
Administrative Committee of the 1958
1 The Inland Transport Committee provides a
forum for its member Governments for (i)
Cooperation and consultation based on the
exchange of information and experiences, (ii) the
analysis of transport trends and economics and
transport policy trends, and (iii) coordinated action
designed to achieve an efficient, coherent, balanced
and flexible transport system in the ECE region
which is based on principles of market economy,
pursues the objectives of safety, environmental
protection and energy efficiency in transport and
takes into account transport developments and
policy of member Governments; WP.29 Reports to
this Committee.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
59583
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
Agreement (AC.1) (34th session) and
Executive Committee of the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3)(18th
session).
December
12–15 Working Party on Passive Safety
(GRSP) (40th session)
Provisional Schedule of meetings of
WP.29 and its working parties of experts
2007
January
9–12 Working Party on Pollution and
Energy (GRPE) (53rd session)
26–29 World Forum for
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
(WP.29) (142nd session) and
Administrative Committee of the 1958
Agreement (AC.1) (36th session) and
Executive Committee of the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3) (20th
session).
September
18–21 Working Party on Brakes and
Running Gear (GRRF) (62nd session)
October
5–9 Working Party on Brakes and
Running Gear (GRRF) (61st session)
1–4 Working Party on Lighting and
Light Signaling (GRE) (59th session)
23–26 Working Party on General
Safety Provisions (GRSG) (93rd
session)
March
November
12 Administrative Committee for the
Coordination of Work (WP.29/AC.2)
(93rd session)
13–16 World Forum for
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
(WP.29) (141st session) and
Administrative Committee of the 1958
Agreement (AC.1) (35th session) and
Executive Committee of the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3) (19th
session).
26–30 Working Party on Lighting and
Light Signaling (GRE) (58th session)
12 Administrative Committee for the
Coordination of Work (WP.2/AC.2)
(95th session)
13–16 World Forum for
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
(WP.29) (143rd session) and
Administrative Committee of the 1958
Agreement (AC.1) (37th session) and
Executive Committee of the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3) (21st
session).
Feb
December
April
11–14 Working Party on Passive Safety
(GRSP) (42nd session)
30–4 (May) Working Party on General
Safety Provisions (GRSG) (92nd
session)
III. Status of Activities Under the
Program of Work of the 1998 Global
Agreement
May
In March 2001, NHTSA submitted to
WP.29 and AC.3 its final
recommendations for the first motor
vehicle safety GTRs to be considered for
establishment under that Agreement.
The Administrative Committee for the
Coordination of Work of WP.29 (AC.2)
reviewed the recommendations made by
various contracting parties, including
the United States, Canada, the European
7–11 Working Party on Passive Safety
(GRSP) (41st session)
June
5–8 Working Party on Pollution and
Energy (GRPE) (54th session)
25 Administrative Committee for the
Coordination of Work (WP.29/AC.2)
(94th session)
Union, Japan, and Russia, as well as
those made by other interested parties
and reached agreement on a Program of
Work, taking into account the workload
of the working parties of experts under
WP.29. AC.2 then submitted the
Program of Work to AC.3. AC.3
approved the Program of Work and
requested that contracting parties
volunteer to sponsor each listed
regulation by submitting a formal
proposal as required by Article 6 of the
1998 Global Agreement. WP.29 formally
adopted the Program of Work at its
session in March 2002. Subsequently,
several contracting parties stepped
forward to sponsor each of the items in
the Program of Work. Progress has been
made in several areas, and the Program
of Work has been updated accordingly.
The first GTR, on door locks and door
retention components, and the second
GTR, on motor cycle emission
measurement procedures 2, have been
established. The status of hydrogen fuel
cell vehicles as well as tire performance
has been upgraded from an area for an
exchange of information to an area for
active development as a GTR.
Information exchange in the area of field
of vision has been replaced with
information exchange on electronic
stability control (ESC). Due to
difficulties in achieving consensus to
establish a GTR on Lower Anchorages
and Tethers for Child Safety Seats, it
was decided at the March 2006 WP.29
session to remove the item from the
Program of Work.
The following table contains an
updated list of subjects and sponsoring
contracting parties. In addition to the
list below, the contracting parties will
continue to exchange information in the
following areas: Electronic stability
control (GRRF); side-impact and vehicle
compatibility (GRSP); worldwide light
duty vehicle test procedures (GRPE);
and intelligent vehicle systems (WP.29).
PROGRAM OF WORK OF THE 1998 GLOBAL AGREEMENT
Working Party of
Experts
Subject
Sponsoring Contracting
Party
GRRF ................
Motorcycle Brake Systems ......................................................................
Passenger Vehicle Brakes ......................................................................
Tire Performance .....................................................................................
Installation of Lighting and Light-Signaling Devices ...............................
Safety Glazing .........................................................................................
Controls and Displays .............................................................................
Pedestrian Safety ....................................................................................
Head Restraints .......................................................................................
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Safety Sub-Group ......................................
Canada ..........................
U.K. and Japan ..............
France ............................
Canada ..........................
Germany ........................
Canada ..........................
European Commission ..
U.S.A. .............................
Germany, Japan and
U.S.A..
GRE ..................
GRSG ...............
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
GRSP ................
2 This GTR will not be discussed in detail in this
notice as the Environmental Protection Agency is
the lead agency on this issue.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Chair
Canada.
U.K.
U.K.
Canada
Germany
Canada
Japan
U.S.A.
TBD
59584
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
PROGRAM OF WORK OF THE 1998 GLOBAL AGREEMENT—Continued
Working Party of
Experts
Subject
Sponsoring Contracting
Party
GRPE ................
Worldwide Heavy-Duty Certification Procedure ......................................
Worldwide Motorcycle Emission Test Cycle ...........................................
Heavy-Duty On-Board Diagnostics .........................................................
Off-Cycle Emissions ................................................................................
Non-Road Mobile Machinery ...................................................................
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Environmental Sub-Group ..........................
European Commission ..
Germany ........................
U.S.A. .............................
U.S.A. .............................
European Commission ..
Germany, Japan and
U.S.A.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
a. Status of Established GTRs Under the
1998 Global Agreement
At the November 2004 WP.29 session,
the Door Lock and Door Retention
Components GTR was adopted as the
first GTR under the 1998 Global
Agreement. Per the 1998 Agreement, the
U.S. is obligated to initiate the process
for adopting the provisions of GTR–1.
On December 15, 2004, the U.S. issued
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) closely based on GTR1, which
satisfied this obligation (69 FR 75020;
Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19840;
NPRM).
NHTSA has considered the comments
submitted and is in the process of
concluding the Final Rule. In the Final
Rule the U.S. will explain why it agrees
or disagrees with the substantive
comments it received and describes the
changes, if any, it made to the rule in
response to the comments with which it
agrees.
If public comments on the NPRM lead
the agency to adopt a final rule that
differs in any significant way from the
GTR, the U.S. will consider submitting
a proposal to make conforming
amendments to the GTR.
b. Formal Proposals for the
Development of GTRs Submitted by
Contracting Parties Based on Program of
Work
As of the publication of the October
8, 2004, Federal Register Notice (69 FR
60490), and pursuant to Article 6 of the
1998 Global Agreement, which sets
forth the process and conditions under
which a contracting party may make
proposals for the establishment of GTRs,
the following proposals have been made
by contracting parties and referred to
the proper working party of experts.
These proposals and supporting
documentations can be found in the
docket for this notice. They can also be
found on the UN/ECE Website 3 or
under the respective working party of
expert link.4
3 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29glob.html.
4 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/
welcwp29.htm.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:52 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
• Exhaust emissions from non-road
mobile machinery (NRMM) (Sponsored
by the EC), GTR to be prepared by
GRPE. (UN/ECE document TRANS/
WP.29/AC.3/14)
• Head Restraints (Sponsored by
U.S.A), GTR to be prepared by GRSP.
(UN/ECE document TRANS/WP.29/
AC.3/13)
• Heavy-duty off-cycle emissions
vehicles (Sponsored by U.S.A.), GTR to
be prepared by GRPE. (UN/ECE
document TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/12)
• Passenger vehicle brake systems
(Sponsored by Japan and United
Kingdom), GTR to be prepared by GRRF.
(UN/ECE document TRANS/WP.29/
AC.3/10)
• Passenger vehicle tires (Sponsored
by France), GTR to be prepared by
GRRF. (UNECE document listing
pending)
c. Status of proposed GTRs under the
1998 Global Agreement
1. Motorcycle Brake Systems
Work on this GTR began following its
sponsorship by Canada at the 52nd
session of GRRF, in September 2002.
Canada initiated and chaired six
meetings of the informal working group.
The meetings were open to all interested
parties. The attendees for the informal
group included representatives from:
Canada, USA, Italy, the UK, Japan,
India, IMMA (International Motorcycle
Manufacturers Association), FEMA
(Federation of European Motorcyclists’
Associations), AMA (American
Motorcyclist Association), and JAMA
(Japan Automobile Manufacturers
Association, Inc.).
Early work to research and compare
various performance requirements
found in several existing national
motorcycle brake regulations was
conducted independently by the
governments and the motorcycle
industry (UNECE Regulation No. 78, the
United States Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard, FMVSS No. 122 and
the Japanese Safety Standard JSS 12–
61). The subsequent reports, along with
proposed provisions for the GTR, were
presented at the 51st, 52nd, and 53rd
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Chair
European Commission
Germany
Japan
U.S.A.
European Commission
European Commission
sessions of GRRF. Despite using
different methodologies, the results
were found to be very similar between
the three reports. Based on this and
other research subsequently completed,
a preliminary outline of the
performance requirements for the GTR
was developed
The informal working group reviewed
and compared the requirements in each
national regulation during the
development of the GTR. These
regulations, in conjunction with the
research and analysis, were used to
develop a draft table of regulatory
requirements. This draft table was
continually updated as technical issues
were raised, discussed and resolved.
The table was presented and discussed
at the 57th session of GRRF in February
2005, and discussed further at the 58th
session of GRRF in September 2005 in
conjunction with a first draft of the
proposed GTR (See TRANS/WP.29/
GRRF/2005/18 and TRANS/WP.29/
GRRF/2005/18/Add.1).5
Where national regulations or
standards address the same subject, e.g.
dry stop or heat fade performance
requirements, the informal group
reviewed comparative data on the
relative stringency of the requirements
from the research and studies and
included the most severe options. In
many cases, individual members of the
informal group were tasked with
completing additional testing to confirm
or refine the testing and performance
requirements. Certain tests, such as a
wet brake test, were discussed on the
basis of the original rationales and the
appropriateness of the tests to modern
conditions and technologies. In each of
these steps, specific technical issues
were raised, discussed, and resolved. A
full discussion of each of these issues
and the technical rationale is provided
in the latest draft document, which can
be accessed on the WP.29 website 6 and
in the docket of this Notice.
5 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29grrf/grrfage.html.
6 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29grrf/grrfspecial0606.html.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
At a special session of GRRF, held
June 19, 2006, the draft GTR on
motorcycle brake systems was accepted
by all the Contracting Parties to the 1998
Agreement that were present and was
recommended for adoption by WP.29/
AC.3 at the upcoming 140th session
scheduled for November 2006. In
summary, the GTR would provide
several benefits that would ultimately
benefit motorcycle users and other
stakeholders. In addition to providing
clear and objective test procedures and
requirements that can be consistently
and objectively followed; the the GTR
also addresses recently developed
technologies, such as combined braking
systems (CBS) and antilock brake
systems (ABS). In addition, since the
GTR draws from the best of existing
national regulations from around the
world, the U.S. would benefit from the
GTR in various ways. Among these are
improvements in testing procedures
such as an improved wet brake test that
simulates in service conditions by
spraying water onto the disc rather than
immersing the disc in water; new tests
for ABS systems; and a specified
burnishing procedure that is more
objective.
Having worked closely with the other
contracting parties on the development
of this GTR, NHTSA intends to vote
positively for it at the November 2006
session of WP.29. If established as a
GTR under the 1998 Agreement, this
regulation will be the third adopted
under the 1998 Agreement. NHTSA
welcomes any comments from the
public regarding this GTR and NHTSA’s
decision to vote positively for its
establishment.
2. Installation of Light and LightSignaling Devices
In March 2003, at the 129th Session
of WP.29, a formal proposal to develop
a GTR on the installation of light and
light-signaling devices for vehicles other
than motorcycles was adopted. (See
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/4).7
A draft GTR containing provisions for
the installation of 22 vehicle lighting
and light-signalling devices was
subsequently developed by GRE over
the course of nine formal and informal
meetings. However, in a number of
areas, the informal working group
encountered situations where
established safety provisions applied by
some Contracting Parties differed from
other equally well-established
provisions applied by others. For those
instances, GRE attempted to reach a
science and data based solution by
7 https://www.unece.org/trans/doc/2003/wp29/
TRANS-WP29-AC3–04e.doc.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
considering, among other things, which
provisions were more effective or more
cost beneficial. GRE could not reach
consensus on several requirements
because the necessary data do not exist
to justify selecting one or the other.
In November 2005, the chairman of
the informal working group turned to
the Executive Committee for the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3) for a solution
forward. AC.3 instructed GRE to remove
from the draft GTR all portions that
specified the colour or presence of the
various lighting devices covered by the
regulation, leaving those choices to each
Contracting Party to make, as the GTR
is adopted into their various national
jurisdictions. However, at the
subsequent informal meeting in April
2006, the informal working group
agreed that the presence of lighting
devices is essential for the GTR and
decided to give it a final attempt to work
on a solution. Since then, several
comments have been received from
various stakeholders, including the auto
industry, and are currently being
considered.
3. Safety Glazing
At the 132nd session of WP.29 in
March 2004 the formal proposal to
develop a GTR on safety glazing was
adopted (TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/9), with a
modification to restrict the scope of the
GTR to glass safety glazing. An informal
working group was established under
the Chairmanship of Germany, the
sponsor of the GTR. At the 137th
session of WP.29 in November 2005,
AC.3 further agreed that the GTR would
not include installation provisions and
that the informal working group could
consider possible approaches to
including markings in the GTR.
After six meetings of the informal
group, a draft GTR was submitted to
GRSG for the April 2005 session
(TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2005/9).8 The
first report was submitted to WP.29 for
its 136th session in June 2005 (TRANS/
WP.29/2005/49).9 Based on comments
from the United States and Canada
concerning the format of the draft, the
proposal was returned to the informal
group for further consideration. Since
the April 2005 GRSG session, the
informal group has met four times.
The draft GTR specifies performance
requirements for various types of
glazing (i.e., laminated glass) intended
for installation in Category 1 and 2
vehicles as defined in Special
8 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29grsg/grsgage.html.
9 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29age.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59585
Resolution No. 1.10 The GTR includes
requirements that apply to glazing as an
item of equipment, and does not include
requirements for vehicles. Performance
requirements have some differences
depending on whether a material is for
a windscreen or, as an example, door
glass.
The draft GTR is based in large part
upon ECE Regulation 43. One
significant difference between the draft
GTR and the ECE regulation is that the
minimum light transmittance level for
glazing requisite for the driver’s forward
field of vision is 70%, as currently
specified in the U.S. standard rather
than 75%, as currently specified in the
ECE standard. However, the test
procedure is based on the ECE test
procedure, which specifies testing in
defined zones based on the eye position
of the driver and with the glazing at the
intended installation angle. This test
procedure is considered more realistic
than the current U.S. procedure that
tests the glazing at a normal angle to the
surface.
Another difference is the drop height
for the small (227 g) ball test for
uniformly toughened glass panes. The
ECE regulation had specified different
drop heights depending on the
thickness of the glazing. Based upon
some test results provided by Japan
which determine that the force from a
drop height of 2.0 m replicated the force
of a typical object that impacts a pane,
it was decided that a single drop height
of 2.0 m could be specified.
The informal working group will be
meeting again prior to the October 2006
session of GRSG. A new draft of the
GTR may be provided to GRSG at that
session however, the draft GTR will not
be formally submitted to GRSG before
the April 2007 session. Therefore, the
earliest it could be considered for
adoption by WP.29/AC.3 is at the
November 2007 session.
4. Pedestrian Safety
WP.29 decided to begin work on
pedestrian safety in May 2002, by
establishing an informal working group
under the GRSP. The formal proposal to
develop a GTR (TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/
7) 11 was submitted and adopted by the
AC.3 at its tenth session, in March 2004.
The terms of reference of the group can
be found on the UNECE website (See
INF GR/PS/2).12
The European Commission (EC) is the
sponsor of the GTR. The group has held
10 A detailed explanation of Special Resolution
No. 1 is set forth in Section III. D., below.
11 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29glob_proposal.html.
12 https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/
wp29wgs/wp29grsp/pedestrian_1.html.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
59586
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
ten meetings, which were attended by
representatives of: The Netherlands,
France, Germany, Canada, EC, Spain,
Japan, USA, Korea, Italy, Turkey, the
European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety
Committee (EEVC), Consumers
International (CI), the European
Association of Automotive Suppliers
(CLEPA) and the International
Organization of Motor Vehicle
Manufacturers (OICA). The meetings
were chaired by Japan.
This GTR would improve pedestrian
safety by requiring vehicle hoods and
bumpers to absorb energy more
efficiently when impacted in a 40
kilometer per hour (km/h) vehicle-topedestrian impact, which accounts for
more than 75 percent of the pedestrian
injured accidents (AIS 1+) reported by
International Harmonized Research
Activities (IHRA)/Pedestrian Safety
working group (IHRA/PS). It consists of
two sets of performance criteria
applying to: (a) The hood top and
fenders; and (b) the front bumper. Test
procedures have been developed for
each region using sub-system impacts
for adult and child head protection and
adult leg protection.
The head impact requirements will
ensure that hood tops and fenders will
provide head protection when struck by
a pedestrian. The hood top and fenders
would be impacted with a child
headform and an adult headform at 35
km/h. The Head Injury Criterion (HIC)
must not exceed 1,000 over one half of
a child headform test area and must not
exceed 1,000 over two third of a
combined child and adult headform test
areas. The HIC for the remaining areas
must not exceed 1,700 for both
headforms.
The leg protection requirements for
the front bumper would require
bumpers to subject pedestrians to lower
impact forces. This GTR specifies that
the vehicle bumper is struck at 40 km/
h with a legform that simulates the
impact response of an adult’s leg.
Vehicles with a lower bumper height of
less than 425 millimeter (mm) are tested
with a lower legform, while vehicles
with a lower bumper height of more
than 500 mm are tested with an upper
legform test device. Vehicles with a
lower bumper height between 425 mm
and 500 mm are tested with either
legform chosen by the manufacturer. In
the lower legform to bumper test,
vehicles must meet limits on lateral
knee bending angle, knee shearing
displacement, and lateral tibia
acceleration. In the upper legform to
bumper test, limits are placed on the
instantaneous sum of the impact forces
with respect to time and the bending
moment on the test.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
At the May 2006 GRSP meeting, the
working group presented a draft version
of the Pedestrian GTR for review by all
GRSP experts.13 Due to unresolved
issues with the applicability of the
regulation and differences between it
and the European Directive on
Pedestrian Safety, the GRSP
recommended the GTR remain under
the working group pending review at
the December 2006 GRSP session.
NHTSA is currently performing testing
and analyses to aid in the resolution of
determining the vehicle applicability of
the GTR, including preliminary cost/
benefit analyses. NHTSA expects to
complete these analyses by the
December 2006 GRSP session.
5. Head Restraints
During the November 2004 meeting of
WP.29 and the Executive Committee of
the 1998 Global Agreement, NHTSA
formalized its sponsorship of the
regulation on Head Restraints as
identified in the Program of Work of the
1998 Global Agreement. In the October
8, 2004, (69 FR 60460) notice, NHTSA
sought comments on a proposal that
formalizes the U.S. sponsorship of a
GTR on head restraints. In response to
the agency’s request for comment on the
proposal, NHTSA received no
comments. The proposal was formally
presented by the U.S. and adopted by
the Executive Committee and referred to
the Working Party of Experts (GRSP) at
the March 2005 Session of WP.29. In
February 2005, the GRSP formed an
informal working group, chaired by the
US, to develop a GTR. The working
group has met seven times with the
following contracting parties and
representatives participating:
Netherlands, France, Canada, Japan,
Germany, Spain, Korea, the UK, USA,
the EC, CLEPA and OICA.
In developing and drafting the new
GTR, the working group is combining
elements from UNECE Regulations Nos.
17, 25, and newly upgraded United
States Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) 202, as well as
considering proposals for requirements
not contained in the previously
mentioned regulations. The working
group is making good progress on
exchanging data and has started drafting
the regulatory text. The major
outstanding issues are:
• Applicability: Applying the GTR to
vehicles up to 4,500 kg or limiting it to
3,500 kg.
• Backset: There is general consensus
that it should be regulated, but the
13 (https://www.unece.org/trans/doc/2006/
wp29grsp/ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRSP–2006–02e.doc).
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
maximum backset limit is still being
discussed.
• Measuring procedures for height
and backset: There is continued
discussion on using the H-point or Rpoint as the point of reference.
• Dynamic Test: There is consensus
to incorporate the U.S. dynamic test
established in the 202 Final Rule, but
there remains discussion on the injury
criteria and dummy.
The working group has submitted two
Progress Reports on the status of this
GTR. They can be found in the docket
for this notice.
6. Other GTRs
The GRRF began work to develop a
GTR for light vehicle tires in September
2006, which was scheduled following
approval by WP.29/AC.3 at the June
2006 session. For this GTR, WP.29/AC.3
provided a working framework by
outlining each of its major elements
prior to the beginning of technical
development. This approach was taken
by WP.29/AC.3 because of lessons
learned from past GTRs, where much of
the technical development was
encumbered by policy considerations
being undertaken by technical experts at
the working group level. By settling
many of the policy decisions early, it is
expected that the technical development
will progress smoothly and in the least
amount of time possible. France is the
technical sponsor and the UK will be
chairing the informal working group
meetings.
The GTR on passenger vehicle brakes
was placed on hold until common
issues identified with the motorcycle
GTR are resolved. The decision to focus
on resolving the issues under the
motorcycle GTR before proceeding with
substantially similar issues in the
passenger car GTR was made by AC.3 at
its November 2005 session.
The GRSG has developed many of the
criteria for the location, illumination
and position of the controls and
displays for motor vehicles. Issues
regarding the use of certain symbols
remain unresolved. Comments received
in response to a NHTSA NPRM has led
the group to reflect on its previous work
and to further investigate some of the
symbols originally proposed by this
group and their ability to be recognized.
The Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers has agreed to conduct a
study to evaluate the symbols and
determine which symbols have
appropriate levels of recognition with
the U.S. public as a basis for further
development of the table in the GTR.
Phase 1 of the study has been completed
and a presentation was given to WP.29
in November 2005. Based on this phase,
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
it was agreed to postpone further work
on the GTR until a second phase of
testing some symbols could be
conducted. The second phase has
recently been completed and
preliminary information was shared at
the June 2006 session of WP.29.
However, review of this phase may not
be completed in time for discussion at
GRSG in October 2006, in which case it
would be discussed in April 2007.
At its 136th Session, WP.29/AC
agreed to a proposal from Germany,
Japan and United States regarding how
best to manage the development process
of a GTR for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
Under the agreed process, once AC.3
develops and approves a plan for the
development of the GTR, two subgroups
will be formed to address its safety and
environment aspects. The safety
subgroup will report to GRSP and the
environmental subgroup to GRPE. Each
subgroup will have a chair. In order to
ensure communication between the
subgroups and continuous engagement
with WP.29 and AC.3, a project manager
will be assigned to coordinate and
manage the various aspects of the work
ensuring that the agreed plan is
implemented properly and that
milestones and timelines are set and
met. The co-sponsors are in the process
of developing an action plan outlining
the areas that the subgroup on safety
and the environment should be
considering in developing the GTR.
d. Special Resolutions Under the 1998
Global Agreement
At the one-hundred-and-twentieth
session of WP.29, the Government of
Japan, through document TRANS/
WP.29/2000/39, presented a proposal
concerning the necessity of establishing
common definitions to facilitate the
formulation of future global technical
regulations (gtrs), selecting vehicle
category, vehicle weight, and vehicle
dimension as candidate items requiring
a common definition. The necessity of
common definitions was unanimously
recognized at the WP.29 session and, in
October 2000, an informal group was
formed under the Working Party on
General Safety Provisions (GRSG) and
Japan volunteered to chair the effort.
As originally drafted, this proposal
was expected to be a GTR. However, it
was noted that the document did not
contain performance requirements as
required by Article 4 of the 1998
Agreement, and as such did not meet
the criteria for a GTR. Using its
authority under Article 3 of the 1998
Agreement to ‘‘fulfil such other
functions as may be appropriate,’’ the
Executive Committee decided that this
proposal would become Special
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Resolution No. 1 (S.R. 1). Because S.R.
1 does not contain performance
requirements, it also does not trigger the
obligations of Article 7 of the 1998
Agreement requiring Contracting Parties
to initiate procedures to adopt GTRs.
While GTRs must be drafted in
accordance with S.R. 1, Contracting
Parties are not required to use this
document when drafting regulations in
their own country.
S.R. 1 applies to all wheeled vehicles,
equipment and parts falling within the
scope of the Agreement Concerning the
Establishing of Global Technical
Regulation for Wheeled Vehicles,
Equipment and Parts, which can be
fitted and/or be used on Wheeled
Vehicles. Generally, vehicles are
categorized as either passenger vehicles
(Category 1 vehicles), commercial
vehicles (Category 2 vehicles), or 2- or
3-wheeled vehicles (Category 3
vehicles). S.R. 1 also includes
definitions of masses and dimensions.
S.R. 1 was adopted at the June 2005
session of WP.29 and can be found at
TRANS/WP.29/1045.
e. Compendium of Candidate GTRs
Article 5 of the 1998 Agreement
provides for the creation of a
compendium of candidate technical
regulations of the Contracting Parties.
NHTSA has submitted a request for six
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) to be included in this
Compendium. These FMVSS have all
been listed in the Compendium after an
affirmative vote of the Executive
Committee. The FMVSS listed in the
Compendium are:
• FMVSS 108—Lamps, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment
• FMVSS 135—Light Vehicle Brake
Systems
• FMVSS 139—New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles
• FMVSS 202—Head Restraints
• FMVSS 205—Glazing Materials
• FMVSS 213—Child Restraint
Systems
To facilitate the review and
consideration of these FMVSS by other
Contracting Parties, NHTSA is arranging
translations of these documents. To
date, all of the FMVSS in the
Compendium are available in Chinese
and French. All except FMVSS 202 are
available in Arabic, Russian and
Spanish. If you would like a translation,
please contact Mr. Wondimneh as noted
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
IV. Request for Comments
The agency invites public comments
on the formal proposals for the
development of GTRs submitted by
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59587
contracting parties and the work to
develop each of the GTRs already
ongoing. In particular, the agency seeks
comments on the motorcycle brake
systems GTR, which is scheduled to be
established as a GTR under the 1998
Agreement by a consensus vote at the
November 2006 session of WP.29.
V. Privacy Act
Please note that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78), or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued on October 3, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6–16681 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review; Comment Request
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OCC is soliciting comment
concerning its information collection
titled, ‘‘(MA) Securities Exchange Act
Disclosure Rules (12 CFR Part 11).’’ The
OCC also gives notice that it has
submitted the collection of information
to OMB for review.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Communications Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Public Information Room,
Mailstop 1–5, Attention: 1557–0106,
250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59582-59587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16681]
[[Page 59582]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2003-14395, Notice 3]
NHTSA's Activities Under the United Nations Economic Commission
for Europe 1998 Global Agreement
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DoT.
ACTION: Notice of activities under the 1998 Global Agreement and
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA is publishing this notice to inform the public of the
schedule of upcoming meetings of the World Forum for Harmonization of
Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and its working parties of experts for the
remainder of calendar year 2006 and the tentative schedule for calendar
year 2007. Further, this notice informs the public about the status of
activities under the Program of Work of the 1998 Global Agreement and
requests comments on various aspects of these activities. Specifically,
this notice seeks comment on the recommended Global Technical
Regulation (GTR) on motorcycle brake systems that was referred by the
Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) to the Executive
Committee of the 1998 Global Agreement (AC.3) for a vote at the 140th
session of WP.29 in November 2006. Publication of this information is
in accordance with NHTSA's Statement of Policy regarding Agency Policy
Goals and Public Participation in the Implementation of the 1998 Global
Agreement on Global Technical Regulations.
DATES: Written comments may be submitted to this agency and must be
received within 30 days of publication of this notice.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments in writing to: Docket
Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
Alternatively, you may submit your comments electronically by logging
onto the Dockets Management System Web site at https://dms.dot.gov.
Click on ``Help & Information'' or ``Help/Info'' to view instructions
for filing your comments electronically. Regardless of how you submit
your comments, you should mention the docket number of this document.
Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http:/
/dms.dot.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see
the Privacy Act heading under Request for Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ezana Wondimneh, Division Chief,
International Policy and Harmonization (NVS-133), National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590; phone number (202) 366-0846, fax number (202) 493-2290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. List of meetings of WP.29 and its working parties of experts
III. Status of activities under the Program of Work of the 1998
Global Agreement
a. Status of Established GTRs under the 1998 Global Agreement
b. Formal proposals for the development of GTRs submitted by
contracting parties based on the Program of Work
c. Status of proposed GTRs under the 1998 Global Agreement
1. Motorcycle Brake Systems
2. Installation of Light and Light-Signaling Devices
3. Safety Glazing
4. Pedestrian Safety
5. Head Restraints
6. Other GTRs
d. Specific Resolutions under the 1998 Agreement
e. Compendium of Candidate GTRs
IV. Request for Comments
V. Privacy Act
I. Background
On August 23, 2000, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (65 FR
51236) a statement of policy regarding the agency's policy goals and
public participation in the implementation of the 1998 Global
Agreement, indicating that each calendar year the agency would provide
a list of scheduled meetings of the World Forum for Harmonization of
Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the working parties of experts, as well
as meetings of the Executive Committee of the 1998 Global Agreement
(AC.3). Further, in that policy statement, the agency stated that it
would keep the public informed about a program of work under the
Agreement (i.e., agreed subjects for which Global Technical Regulations
[GTR] should be developed) as well as a list of candidate GTRs that
have been formally proposed by a contracting party and referred to a
working party of experts, including draft GTRs that have been developed
and referred by a working party of experts to AC.3 for establishment
under the Agreement.
Through a series of Federal Register notices published between July
2000 and October 2004 (65 FR 44565), (66 FR 4893), (68 FR 5333) (69 FR
60460), the agency notified the public about status of activities under
the 1998 Global Agreement and sought comments on various issues and
proposals. In the most recent notice (69 FR 60460), the agency
discussed the status of activities under the Program of Work for the
1998 Global Agreement, which was formally adopted by WP.29 at its March
2002 Session, made available and sought comment on formal proposals for
GTRs submitted by contracting parties as well as recommended GTRs.
II. List of Meetings of WP.29 and Its Working Parties of Experts
The following lists contain meetings of WP.29 and its working
parties of experts for the remainder of calendar year 2006 and for
calendar year 2007. The meeting dates for 2007 are subject to
confirmation by the Inland Transport Committee of the United Nations
Economic Commission for Europe.\1\ However, the agency does not
anticipate any changes to the schedule. In addition, working parties of
experts may schedule, if necessary, informal meetings in addition to
their regularly scheduled ones in order to address technical matters
specific to GTRs under consideration. The formation of these groups,
and their timing, are recommended by the sponsor and chair of the group
and are agreed to by WP.29 and AC.3. The schedule and place of meetings
are made available to interested parties in proposals and periodic
reports which are posted on the Web site of WP.29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Inland Transport Committee provides a forum for its
member Governments for (i) Cooperation and consultation based on the
exchange of information and experiences, (ii) the analysis of
transport trends and economics and transport policy trends, and
(iii) coordinated action designed to achieve an efficient, coherent,
balanced and flexible transport system in the ECE region which is
based on principles of market economy, pursues the objectives of
safety, environmental protection and energy efficiency in transport
and takes into account transport developments and policy of member
Governments; WP.29 Reports to this Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule of Meetings of WP.29 and Its Working Parties of Experts 2006
October
2-6 Working Party on Lighting and Light Signaling (GRE) (57th session)
17-20 Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) (91st session)
November
13 Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work (WP.2/AC.2)
(92nd session)
14-17 World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
(140th session) and Administrative Committee of the 1958
[[Page 59583]]
Agreement (AC.1) (34th session) and Executive Committee of the 1998
Global Agreement (AC.3)(18th session).
December
12-15 Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) (40th session)
Provisional Schedule of meetings of WP.29 and its working parties of
experts 2007
January
9-12 Working Party on Pollution and Energy (GRPE) (53rd session)
Feb
5-9 Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) (61st session)
March
12 Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work (WP.29/AC.2)
(93rd session)
13-16 World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
(141st session) and Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement
(AC.1) (35th session) and Executive Committee of the 1998 Global
Agreement (AC.3) (19th session).
26-30 Working Party on Lighting and Light Signaling (GRE) (58th
session)
April
30-4 (May) Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) (92nd
session)
May
7-11 Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) (41st session)
June
5-8 Working Party on Pollution and Energy (GRPE) (54th session)
25 Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work (WP.29/AC.2)
(94th session)
26-29 World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
(142nd session) and Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement
(AC.1) (36th session) and Executive Committee of the 1998 Global
Agreement (AC.3) (20th session).
September
18-21 Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) (62nd session)
October
1-4 Working Party on Lighting and Light Signaling (GRE) (59th session)
23-26 Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) (93rd session)
November
12 Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work (WP.2/AC.2)
(95th session)
13-16 World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
(143rd session) and Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement
(AC.1) (37th session) and Executive Committee of the 1998 Global
Agreement (AC.3) (21st session).
December
11-14 Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) (42nd session)
III. Status of Activities Under the Program of Work of the 1998 Global
Agreement
In March 2001, NHTSA submitted to WP.29 and AC.3 its final
recommendations for the first motor vehicle safety GTRs to be
considered for establishment under that Agreement. The Administrative
Committee for the Coordination of Work of WP.29 (AC.2) reviewed the
recommendations made by various contracting parties, including the
United States, Canada, the European Union, Japan, and Russia, as well
as those made by other interested parties and reached agreement on a
Program of Work, taking into account the workload of the working
parties of experts under WP.29. AC.2 then submitted the Program of Work
to AC.3. AC.3 approved the Program of Work and requested that
contracting parties volunteer to sponsor each listed regulation by
submitting a formal proposal as required by Article 6 of the 1998
Global Agreement. WP.29 formally adopted the Program of Work at its
session in March 2002. Subsequently, several contracting parties
stepped forward to sponsor each of the items in the Program of Work.
Progress has been made in several areas, and the Program of Work has
been updated accordingly. The first GTR, on door locks and door
retention components, and the second GTR, on motor cycle emission
measurement procedures \2\, have been established. The status of
hydrogen fuel cell vehicles as well as tire performance has been
upgraded from an area for an exchange of information to an area for
active development as a GTR. Information exchange in the area of field
of vision has been replaced with information exchange on electronic
stability control (ESC). Due to difficulties in achieving consensus to
establish a GTR on Lower Anchorages and Tethers for Child Safety Seats,
it was decided at the March 2006 WP.29 session to remove the item from
the Program of Work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This GTR will not be discussed in detail in this notice as
the Environmental Protection Agency is the lead agency on this
issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table contains an updated list of subjects and
sponsoring contracting parties. In addition to the list below, the
contracting parties will continue to exchange information in the
following areas: Electronic stability control (GRRF); side-impact and
vehicle compatibility (GRSP); worldwide light duty vehicle test
procedures (GRPE); and intelligent vehicle systems (WP.29).
Program of Work of the 1998 Global Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working Party of
Experts Subject Sponsoring Contracting Party Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRRF................... Motorcycle Brake Canada........................... Canada.
Systems.
Passenger Vehicle U.K. and Japan................... U.K.
Brakes.
Tire Performance.. France........................... U.K.
GRE.................... Installation of Canada........................... Canada
Lighting and
Light-Signaling
Devices.
GRSG................... Safety Glazing.... Germany.......................... Germany
Controls and Canada........................... Canada
Displays.
GRSP................... Pedestrian Safety. European Commission.............. Japan
Head Restraints... U.S.A............................ U.S.A.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Germany, Japan and U.S.A......... TBD
Vehicle Safety
Sub-Group.
[[Page 59584]]
GRPE................... Worldwide Heavy- European Commission.............. European Commission
Duty
Certification
Procedure.
Worldwide Germany.......................... Germany
Motorcycle
Emission Test
Cycle.
Heavy-Duty On- U.S.A............................ Japan
Board Diagnostics.
Off-Cycle U.S.A............................ U.S.A.
Emissions.
Non-Road Mobile European Commission.............. European Commission
Machinery.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Germany, Japan and U.S.A. European Commission
Vehicle
Environmental Sub-
Group.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Status of Established GTRs Under the 1998 Global Agreement
At the November 2004 WP.29 session, the Door Lock and Door
Retention Components GTR was adopted as the first GTR under the 1998
Global Agreement. Per the 1998 Agreement, the U.S. is obligated to
initiate the process for adopting the provisions of GTR-1. On December
15, 2004, the U.S. issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
closely based on GTR1, which satisfied this obligation (69 FR 75020;
Docket No. NHTSA-2004-19840; NPRM).
NHTSA has considered the comments submitted and is in the process
of concluding the Final Rule. In the Final Rule the U.S. will explain
why it agrees or disagrees with the substantive comments it received
and describes the changes, if any, it made to the rule in response to
the comments with which it agrees.
If public comments on the NPRM lead the agency to adopt a final
rule that differs in any significant way from the GTR, the U.S. will
consider submitting a proposal to make conforming amendments to the
GTR.
b. Formal Proposals for the Development of GTRs Submitted by
Contracting Parties Based on Program of Work
As of the publication of the October 8, 2004, Federal Register
Notice (69 FR 60490), and pursuant to Article 6 of the 1998 Global
Agreement, which sets forth the process and conditions under which a
contracting party may make proposals for the establishment of GTRs, the
following proposals have been made by contracting parties and referred
to the proper working party of experts. These proposals and supporting
documentations can be found in the docket for this notice. They can
also be found on the UN/ECE Website \3\ or under the respective working
party of expert link.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/
wp29glob.html.
\4\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/welcwp29.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhaust emissions from non-road mobile machinery (NRMM)
(Sponsored by the EC), GTR to be prepared by GRPE. (UN/ECE document
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/14)
Head Restraints (Sponsored by U.S.A), GTR to be prepared
by GRSP. (UN/ECE document TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/13)
Heavy-duty off-cycle emissions vehicles (Sponsored by
U.S.A.), GTR to be prepared by GRPE. (UN/ECE document TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/
12)
Passenger vehicle brake systems (Sponsored by Japan and
United Kingdom), GTR to be prepared by GRRF. (UN/ECE document TRANS/
WP.29/AC.3/10)
Passenger vehicle tires (Sponsored by France), GTR to be
prepared by GRRF. (UNECE document listing pending)
c. Status of proposed GTRs under the 1998 Global Agreement
1. Motorcycle Brake Systems
Work on this GTR began following its sponsorship by Canada at the
52nd session of GRRF, in September 2002. Canada initiated and chaired
six meetings of the informal working group. The meetings were open to
all interested parties. The attendees for the informal group included
representatives from: Canada, USA, Italy, the UK, Japan, India, IMMA
(International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association), FEMA (Federation
of European Motorcyclists' Associations), AMA (American Motorcyclist
Association), and JAMA (Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association,
Inc.).
Early work to research and compare various performance requirements
found in several existing national motorcycle brake regulations was
conducted independently by the governments and the motorcycle industry
(UNECE Regulation No. 78, the United States Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard, FMVSS No. 122 and the Japanese Safety Standard JSS 12-
61). The subsequent reports, along with proposed provisions for the
GTR, were presented at the 51st, 52nd, and 53rd sessions of GRRF.
Despite using different methodologies, the results were found to be
very similar between the three reports. Based on this and other
research subsequently completed, a preliminary outline of the
performance requirements for the GTR was developed
The informal working group reviewed and compared the requirements
in each national regulation during the development of the GTR. These
regulations, in conjunction with the research and analysis, were used
to develop a draft table of regulatory requirements. This draft table
was continually updated as technical issues were raised, discussed and
resolved. The table was presented and discussed at the 57th session of
GRRF in February 2005, and discussed further at the 58th session of
GRRF in September 2005 in conjunction with a first draft of the
proposed GTR (See TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2005/18 and TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2005/
18/Add.1).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29grrf/
grrfage.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where national regulations or standards address the same subject,
e.g. dry stop or heat fade performance requirements, the informal group
reviewed comparative data on the relative stringency of the
requirements from the research and studies and included the most severe
options. In many cases, individual members of the informal group were
tasked with completing additional testing to confirm or refine the
testing and performance requirements. Certain tests, such as a wet
brake test, were discussed on the basis of the original rationales and
the appropriateness of the tests to modern conditions and technologies.
In each of these steps, specific technical issues were raised,
discussed, and resolved. A full discussion of each of these issues and
the technical rationale is provided in the latest draft document, which
can be accessed on the WP.29 website \6\ and in the docket of this
Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29grrf/
grrfspecial0606.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59585]]
At a special session of GRRF, held June 19, 2006, the draft GTR on
motorcycle brake systems was accepted by all the Contracting Parties to
the 1998 Agreement that were present and was recommended for adoption
by WP.29/AC.3 at the upcoming 140th session scheduled for November
2006. In summary, the GTR would provide several benefits that would
ultimately benefit motorcycle users and other stakeholders. In addition
to providing clear and objective test procedures and requirements that
can be consistently and objectively followed; the the GTR also
addresses recently developed technologies, such as combined braking
systems (CBS) and antilock brake systems (ABS). In addition, since the
GTR draws from the best of existing national regulations from around
the world, the U.S. would benefit from the GTR in various ways. Among
these are improvements in testing procedures such as an improved wet
brake test that simulates in service conditions by spraying water onto
the disc rather than immersing the disc in water; new tests for ABS
systems; and a specified burnishing procedure that is more objective.
Having worked closely with the other contracting parties on the
development of this GTR, NHTSA intends to vote positively for it at the
November 2006 session of WP.29. If established as a GTR under the 1998
Agreement, this regulation will be the third adopted under the 1998
Agreement. NHTSA welcomes any comments from the public regarding this
GTR and NHTSA's decision to vote positively for its establishment.
2. Installation of Light and Light-Signaling Devices
In March 2003, at the 129th Session of WP.29, a formal proposal to
develop a GTR on the installation of light and light-signaling devices
for vehicles other than motorcycles was adopted. (See TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/
4).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ https://www.unece.org/trans/doc/2003/wp29/TRANS-WP29-AC3-
04e.doc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A draft GTR containing provisions for the installation of 22
vehicle lighting and light-signalling devices was subsequently
developed by GRE over the course of nine formal and informal meetings.
However, in a number of areas, the informal working group encountered
situations where established safety provisions applied by some
Contracting Parties differed from other equally well-established
provisions applied by others. For those instances, GRE attempted to
reach a science and data based solution by considering, among other
things, which provisions were more effective or more cost beneficial.
GRE could not reach consensus on several requirements because the
necessary data do not exist to justify selecting one or the other.
In November 2005, the chairman of the informal working group turned
to the Executive Committee for the 1998 Global Agreement (AC.3) for a
solution forward. AC.3 instructed GRE to remove from the draft GTR all
portions that specified the colour or presence of the various lighting
devices covered by the regulation, leaving those choices to each
Contracting Party to make, as the GTR is adopted into their various
national jurisdictions. However, at the subsequent informal meeting in
April 2006, the informal working group agreed that the presence of
lighting devices is essential for the GTR and decided to give it a
final attempt to work on a solution. Since then, several comments have
been received from various stakeholders, including the auto industry,
and are currently being considered.
3. Safety Glazing
At the 132nd session of WP.29 in March 2004 the formal proposal to
develop a GTR on safety glazing was adopted (TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/9), with
a modification to restrict the scope of the GTR to glass safety
glazing. An informal working group was established under the
Chairmanship of Germany, the sponsor of the GTR. At the 137th session
of WP.29 in November 2005, AC.3 further agreed that the GTR would not
include installation provisions and that the informal working group
could consider possible approaches to including markings in the GTR.
After six meetings of the informal group, a draft GTR was submitted
to GRSG for the April 2005 session (TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2005/9).\8\ The
first report was submitted to WP.29 for its 136th session in June 2005
(TRANS/WP.29/2005/49).\9\ Based on comments from the United States and
Canada concerning the format of the draft, the proposal was returned to
the informal group for further consideration. Since the April 2005 GRSG
session, the informal group has met four times.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29grsg/
grsgage.html.
\9\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/
wp29age.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The draft GTR specifies performance requirements for various types
of glazing (i.e., laminated glass) intended for installation in
Category 1 and 2 vehicles as defined in Special Resolution No. 1.\10\
The GTR includes requirements that apply to glazing as an item of
equipment, and does not include requirements for vehicles. Performance
requirements have some differences depending on whether a material is
for a windscreen or, as an example, door glass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A detailed explanation of Special Resolution No. 1 is set
forth in Section III. D., below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The draft GTR is based in large part upon ECE Regulation 43. One
significant difference between the draft GTR and the ECE regulation is
that the minimum light transmittance level for glazing requisite for
the driver's forward field of vision is 70%, as currently specified in
the U.S. standard rather than 75%, as currently specified in the ECE
standard. However, the test procedure is based on the ECE test
procedure, which specifies testing in defined zones based on the eye
position of the driver and with the glazing at the intended
installation angle. This test procedure is considered more realistic
than the current U.S. procedure that tests the glazing at a normal
angle to the surface.
Another difference is the drop height for the small (227 g) ball
test for uniformly toughened glass panes. The ECE regulation had
specified different drop heights depending on the thickness of the
glazing. Based upon some test results provided by Japan which determine
that the force from a drop height of 2.0 m replicated the force of a
typical object that impacts a pane, it was decided that a single drop
height of 2.0 m could be specified.
The informal working group will be meeting again prior to the
October 2006 session of GRSG. A new draft of the GTR may be provided to
GRSG at that session however, the draft GTR will not be formally
submitted to GRSG before the April 2007 session. Therefore, the
earliest it could be considered for adoption by WP.29/AC.3 is at the
November 2007 session.
4. Pedestrian Safety
WP.29 decided to begin work on pedestrian safety in May 2002, by
establishing an informal working group under the GRSP. The formal
proposal to develop a GTR (TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/7) \11\ was submitted and
adopted by the AC.3 at its tenth session, in March 2004. The terms of
reference of the group can be found on the UNECE website (See INF GR/
PS/2).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/
wp29glob_proposal.html.
\12\ https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29grsp/
pedestrian_1.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The European Commission (EC) is the sponsor of the GTR. The group
has held
[[Page 59586]]
ten meetings, which were attended by representatives of: The
Netherlands, France, Germany, Canada, EC, Spain, Japan, USA, Korea,
Italy, Turkey, the European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC),
Consumers International (CI), the European Association of Automotive
Suppliers (CLEPA) and the International Organization of Motor Vehicle
Manufacturers (OICA). The meetings were chaired by Japan.
This GTR would improve pedestrian safety by requiring vehicle hoods
and bumpers to absorb energy more efficiently when impacted in a 40
kilometer per hour (km/h) vehicle-to-pedestrian impact, which accounts
for more than 75 percent of the pedestrian injured accidents (AIS 1+)
reported by International Harmonized Research Activities (IHRA)/
Pedestrian Safety working group (IHRA/PS). It consists of two sets of
performance criteria applying to: (a) The hood top and fenders; and (b)
the front bumper. Test procedures have been developed for each region
using sub-system impacts for adult and child head protection and adult
leg protection.
The head impact requirements will ensure that hood tops and fenders
will provide head protection when struck by a pedestrian. The hood top
and fenders would be impacted with a child headform and an adult
headform at 35 km/h. The Head Injury Criterion (HIC) must not exceed
1,000 over one half of a child headform test area and must not exceed
1,000 over two third of a combined child and adult headform test areas.
The HIC for the remaining areas must not exceed 1,700 for both
headforms.
The leg protection requirements for the front bumper would require
bumpers to subject pedestrians to lower impact forces. This GTR
specifies that the vehicle bumper is struck at 40 km/h with a legform
that simulates the impact response of an adult's leg. Vehicles with a
lower bumper height of less than 425 millimeter (mm) are tested with a
lower legform, while vehicles with a lower bumper height of more than
500 mm are tested with an upper legform test device. Vehicles with a
lower bumper height between 425 mm and 500 mm are tested with either
legform chosen by the manufacturer. In the lower legform to bumper
test, vehicles must meet limits on lateral knee bending angle, knee
shearing displacement, and lateral tibia acceleration. In the upper
legform to bumper test, limits are placed on the instantaneous sum of
the impact forces with respect to time and the bending moment on the
test.
At the May 2006 GRSP meeting, the working group presented a draft
version of the Pedestrian GTR for review by all GRSP experts.\13\ Due
to unresolved issues with the applicability of the regulation and
differences between it and the European Directive on Pedestrian Safety,
the GRSP recommended the GTR remain under the working group pending
review at the December 2006 GRSP session. NHTSA is currently performing
testing and analyses to aid in the resolution of determining the
vehicle applicability of the GTR, including preliminary cost/benefit
analyses. NHTSA expects to complete these analyses by the December 2006
GRSP session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ (https://www.unece.org/trans/doc/2006/wp29grsp/ECE-TRANS-
WP29-GRSP-2006-02e.doc).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Head Restraints
During the November 2004 meeting of WP.29 and the Executive
Committee of the 1998 Global Agreement, NHTSA formalized its
sponsorship of the regulation on Head Restraints as identified in the
Program of Work of the 1998 Global Agreement. In the October 8, 2004,
(69 FR 60460) notice, NHTSA sought comments on a proposal that
formalizes the U.S. sponsorship of a GTR on head restraints. In
response to the agency's request for comment on the proposal, NHTSA
received no comments. The proposal was formally presented by the U.S.
and adopted by the Executive Committee and referred to the Working
Party of Experts (GRSP) at the March 2005 Session of WP.29. In February
2005, the GRSP formed an informal working group, chaired by the US, to
develop a GTR. The working group has met seven times with the following
contracting parties and representatives participating: Netherlands,
France, Canada, Japan, Germany, Spain, Korea, the UK, USA, the EC,
CLEPA and OICA.
In developing and drafting the new GTR, the working group is
combining elements from UNECE Regulations Nos. 17, 25, and newly
upgraded United States Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
202, as well as considering proposals for requirements not contained in
the previously mentioned regulations. The working group is making good
progress on exchanging data and has started drafting the regulatory
text. The major outstanding issues are:
Applicability: Applying the GTR to vehicles up to 4,500 kg
or limiting it to 3,500 kg.
Backset: There is general consensus that it should be
regulated, but the maximum backset limit is still being discussed.
Measuring procedures for height and backset: There is
continued discussion on using the H-point or R-point as the point of
reference.
Dynamic Test: There is consensus to incorporate the U.S.
dynamic test established in the 202 Final Rule, but there remains
discussion on the injury criteria and dummy.
The working group has submitted two Progress Reports on the status
of this GTR. They can be found in the docket for this notice.
6. Other GTRs
The GRRF began work to develop a GTR for light vehicle tires in
September 2006, which was scheduled following approval by WP.29/AC.3 at
the June 2006 session. For this GTR, WP.29/AC.3 provided a working
framework by outlining each of its major elements prior to the
beginning of technical development. This approach was taken by WP.29/
AC.3 because of lessons learned from past GTRs, where much of the
technical development was encumbered by policy considerations being
undertaken by technical experts at the working group level. By settling
many of the policy decisions early, it is expected that the technical
development will progress smoothly and in the least amount of time
possible. France is the technical sponsor and the UK will be chairing
the informal working group meetings.
The GTR on passenger vehicle brakes was placed on hold until common
issues identified with the motorcycle GTR are resolved. The decision to
focus on resolving the issues under the motorcycle GTR before
proceeding with substantially similar issues in the passenger car GTR
was made by AC.3 at its November 2005 session.
The GRSG has developed many of the criteria for the location,
illumination and position of the controls and displays for motor
vehicles. Issues regarding the use of certain symbols remain
unresolved. Comments received in response to a NHTSA NPRM has led the
group to reflect on its previous work and to further investigate some
of the symbols originally proposed by this group and their ability to
be recognized. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has agreed to
conduct a study to evaluate the symbols and determine which symbols
have appropriate levels of recognition with the U.S. public as a basis
for further development of the table in the GTR. Phase 1 of the study
has been completed and a presentation was given to WP.29 in November
2005. Based on this phase,
[[Page 59587]]
it was agreed to postpone further work on the GTR until a second phase
of testing some symbols could be conducted. The second phase has
recently been completed and preliminary information was shared at the
June 2006 session of WP.29. However, review of this phase may not be
completed in time for discussion at GRSG in October 2006, in which case
it would be discussed in April 2007.
At its 136th Session, WP.29/AC agreed to a proposal from Germany,
Japan and United States regarding how best to manage the development
process of a GTR for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Under the agreed
process, once AC.3 develops and approves a plan for the development of
the GTR, two subgroups will be formed to address its safety and
environment aspects. The safety subgroup will report to GRSP and the
environmental subgroup to GRPE. Each subgroup will have a chair. In
order to ensure communication between the subgroups and continuous
engagement with WP.29 and AC.3, a project manager will be assigned to
coordinate and manage the various aspects of the work ensuring that the
agreed plan is implemented properly and that milestones and timelines
are set and met. The co-sponsors are in the process of developing an
action plan outlining the areas that the subgroup on safety and the
environment should be considering in developing the GTR.
d. Special Resolutions Under the 1998 Global Agreement
At the one-hundred-and-twentieth session of WP.29, the Government
of Japan, through document TRANS/WP.29/2000/39, presented a proposal
concerning the necessity of establishing common definitions to
facilitate the formulation of future global technical regulations
(gtrs), selecting vehicle category, vehicle weight, and vehicle
dimension as candidate items requiring a common definition. The
necessity of common definitions was unanimously recognized at the WP.29
session and, in October 2000, an informal group was formed under the
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) and Japan volunteered
to chair the effort.
As originally drafted, this proposal was expected to be a GTR.
However, it was noted that the document did not contain performance
requirements as required by Article 4 of the 1998 Agreement, and as
such did not meet the criteria for a GTR. Using its authority under
Article 3 of the 1998 Agreement to ``fulfil such other functions as may
be appropriate,'' the Executive Committee decided that this proposal
would become Special Resolution No. 1 (S.R. 1). Because S.R. 1 does not
contain performance requirements, it also does not trigger the
obligations of Article 7 of the 1998 Agreement requiring Contracting
Parties to initiate procedures to adopt GTRs. While GTRs must be
drafted in accordance with S.R. 1, Contracting Parties are not required
to use this document when drafting regulations in their own country.
S.R. 1 applies to all wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts falling
within the scope of the Agreement Concerning the Establishing of Global
Technical Regulation for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts, which
can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles. Generally, vehicles
are categorized as either passenger vehicles (Category 1 vehicles),
commercial vehicles (Category 2 vehicles), or 2- or 3-wheeled vehicles
(Category 3 vehicles). S.R. 1 also includes definitions of masses and
dimensions. S.R. 1 was adopted at the June 2005 session of WP.29 and
can be found at TRANS/WP.29/1045.
e. Compendium of Candidate GTRs
Article 5 of the 1998 Agreement provides for the creation of a
compendium of candidate technical regulations of the Contracting
Parties. NHTSA has submitted a request for six Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards (FMVSS) to be included in this Compendium. These FMVSS
have all been listed in the Compendium after an affirmative vote of the
Executive Committee. The FMVSS listed in the Compendium are:
FMVSS 108--Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated
Equipment
FMVSS 135--Light Vehicle Brake Systems
FMVSS 139--New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles
FMVSS 202--Head Restraints
FMVSS 205--Glazing Materials
FMVSS 213--Child Restraint Systems
To facilitate the review and consideration of these FMVSS by other
Contracting Parties, NHTSA is arranging translations of these
documents. To date, all of the FMVSS in the Compendium are available in
Chinese and French. All except FMVSS 202 are available in Arabic,
Russian and Spanish. If you would like a translation, please contact
Mr. Wondimneh as noted in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
IV. Request for Comments
The agency invites public comments on the formal proposals for the
development of GTRs submitted by contracting parties and the work to
develop each of the GTRs already ongoing. In particular, the agency
seeks comments on the motorcycle brake systems GTR, which is scheduled
to be established as a GTR under the 1998 Agreement by a consensus vote
at the November 2006 session of WP.29.
V. Privacy Act
Please note that anyone is able to search the electronic form of
all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78), or
you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued on October 3, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6-16681 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P