Additional Types of Child Restraint Systems That May Be Furnished and Used on Aircraft; Corrections, 59373-59374 [E6-16622]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations The intended effect of this rule is to provide adequate controlled airspace for IFR operations at the Kokohanok Airport, Kokohanok, Alaska. The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routing amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace. Under the section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it creates Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain aircraft executing instrument procedures for the Kokohanok Airport and represents the FAA’s continuing effort to safely and efficiently use the navigable airspace. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: I jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9563, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 Oct 06, 2006 Jkt 211001 § 71.1 [Amended]. 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9P, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated September 1, 2006, and effective September 15, 2006, is amended as follows: * * * * * I Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. * * * * * AAL AK E5 Kokohanok, AK [New] Kokohanok Airport, AK (Lat. 59°26′00″N., long. 154°48′09″W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile radius of the Kokohanok Airport, and that airspace 1 mile north and 1 mile south of the 260° bearing from the Kokohanok Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 8.8 miles west of the Kokohanok Airport, and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 49-mile radius of the Kokohanok Airport. * * * * 59373 the final regulations by revising these sections. These amendments become effective October 10, 2006. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Lauck Claussen, Federal Aviation Administration, Flight Standards Service, Air Transportation Division (AFS–200), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; Telephone 202–267–8166, e-mail nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov. This document corrects two typographical errors in the text of rule language that was published in the Federal Register on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40003). In that final rule, the FAA inadvertently omitted ‘‘ii’’ in the exception referenced in §§ 125.211(b)(2)(ii)(D) and 135.128(a)(2)(ii)(D). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects 14 CFR Part 125 Aircraft, Aviation Safety. * Issued in Anchorage, AK, on September 26, 2006. Anthony M. Wylie, Director, Alaska Flight Service Information Office. [FR Doc. 06–8523 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] 14 CFR Part 135 Air Taxis, Aircraft, Aviation Safety. Accordingly, 14 CFR parts 125 and 135 are corrected by making the following correcting amendments: I BILLING CODE 4910–13–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 125 and 135 [Docket No. FAA–2006–25334; Amendment Nos. 125–51 and 135–106] PART 125—CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS: AIRPLANES HAVING A SEATING CAPACITY OF 20 OR MORE PASSENGERS OR A MAXIMUM PAYLOAD CAPACITY OF 6,000 POUNDS OR MORE; AND RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT 1. The authority citation for part 125 continues to read as follows: I RIN 2120–AI76 Additional Types of Child Restraint Systems That May Be Furnished and Used on Aircraft; Corrections Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701– 44702, 44705, 44710–44711, 44713, 44716– 44717, 44722. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT ACTION: Final rule; correction. I SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration published a final rule in the Federal Register on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40003). The final rule allowed the use of child restraint systems that the FAA approves under the aviation standards of Technical Standard Order C–100b, Child Restraint Systems, or under its certification regulations regarding the approval of materials, parts, processes, and appliances. That final rule contained two non-substantive typographical errors in the rule text of two sections. This document corrects (b) * * * (2) * * * (ii) * * * (D) Except as provided in § 125.211(b)(2)(ii)(C)(3) and § 125.211(b)(2)(ii)(C)(4), booster-type child restraint systems (as defined in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 (49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and harness-type child restraint systems, and lap held child restraints are not approved for use in aircraft; and * * * * * 2. In § 125.211, amend paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D) to read as follows: AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 § 125.211 E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM Seat and safety belts. 10OCR1 59374 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 3. The authority citation for part 135 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 44113, 44701– 44702, 44705, 44709, 44711–44713, 44715– 44717, 44722. 4. In § 135.128, amend paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(D) to read as follows: § 135.128 Use of safety belts and child restraint systems (a) * * * (2) * * * (ii) * * * (D) Except as provided in § 135.128(a)(2)(ii)(C)(3) and § 135.128(a)(2)(ii)(C)(4), booster-type child restraint systems (as defined in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 (49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and harness-type child restraint systems, and lap held child restraints are not approved for use in aircraft; and * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC on September 29, 2006. Brenda D. Courtney, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. [FR Doc. E6–16622 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 520 Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; Omeprazole AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a supplemental new animal drug application (NADA) filed by Merial Ltd. The supplemental NADA provides for administration of omeprazole paste to horses for 8 or 28 days for the prevention of gastric ulcers. DATES: This rule is effective October 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7540, email: melanie.berson@.fda.hhs.gov. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 Oct 06, 2006 Jkt 211001 Merial Ltd., 3239 Satellite Blvd., Bldg. 500, Duluth, GA 30096–4640, filed a supplement to NADA 141–227 for ULCERGARD (omeprazole) Paste. The supplemental application provides for administration of omeprazole paste to horses for 8 or 28 days for the prevention of gastric ulcers. The supplemental NADA is approved as of September 15, 2006, and 21 CFR 520.1615 is amended to reflect the approval. The basis of approval is discussed in the freedom of information summary. In accordance with the freedom of information provisions of 21 CFR part 20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a summary of safety and effectiveness data and information submitted to support approval of this application may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Under section 512(c)(2)(F)(iii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(iii)), this approval qualifies for 3 years of marketing exclusivity beginning September 15, 2006. The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. This rule does not meet the definition of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’ Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801–808. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PART 135—OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND ON-DEMAND OPERATIONS AND RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 Animal drugs. I Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is amended as follows: PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. § 520.1615 Omeprazole. 2. In paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of § 520.1615, at the end of the first sentence remove ‘‘for up to 28 days’’ and add in its place ‘‘for 8 or 28 days’’. I PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Dated: September 27, 2006. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. E6–16604 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [DOD–2006–OS–0134; RIN 0790–AG91] 32 CFR Part 284 Waiver Procedures for Debts Resulting from Erroneous Payments of Pay and Allowances Department of Defense. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: This rule implements policy and prescribes procedures for considering applications for the waiver of debts resulting from erroneous payments of pay and allowances (including travel and transportation allowances) to or on behalf of members of the Uniformed Services and civilian Department of Defense (DoD) employees. The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act of 1996 transferred to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the Comptroller General’s authority to settle claims. The OMB Director subsequently delegated some of these authorities to the Department of Defense. Later, the General Accounting Office Act of 1996 codified many of these delegations to the Secretary of Defense and others and transferred to the OMB Director the authority of the Comptroller General to waive uniformed service member and employee debts arising out of the erroneous payment of pay or allowances exceeding $1,500. The OMB Director subsequently delegated the authority to waive such debts of uniformed service members and DoD employees to the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of Defense further delegated his claims settlement and waiver authorities to the General Counsel. This rule implements the reassignment of the Comptroller General’s former duties within the Department of Defense with little impact on the public. DATES: Effective Date: October 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Hipple, 703–696–8510. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, November 14, 2002 (67 FR 68964), the Department of Defense published 32 CFR part 284 along with parts 281, 282, and 283 as proposed rules with request for public comments. E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59373-59374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 125 and 135

[Docket No. FAA-2006-25334; Amendment Nos. 125-51 and 135-106]
RIN 2120-AI76


Additional Types of Child Restraint Systems That May Be Furnished 
and Used on Aircraft; Corrections

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration published a final rule in 
the Federal Register on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40003). The final rule 
allowed the use of child restraint systems that the FAA approves under 
the aviation standards of Technical Standard Order C-100b, Child 
Restraint Systems, or under its certification regulations regarding the 
approval of materials, parts, processes, and appliances. That final 
rule contained two non-substantive typographical errors in the rule 
text of two sections. This document corrects the final regulations by 
revising these sections.

DATES: These amendments become effective October 10, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Lauck Claussen, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Flight Standards Service, Air Transportation Division 
(AFS-200), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
Telephone 202-267-8166, e-mail nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document corrects two typographical 
errors in the text of rule language that was published in the Federal 
Register on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40003). In that final rule, the FAA 
inadvertently omitted ``ii'' in the exception referenced in Sec. Sec.  
125.211(b)(2)(ii)(D) and 135.128(a)(2)(ii)(D).

List of Subjects

14 CFR Part 125

    Aircraft, Aviation Safety.

14 CFR Part 135

    Air Taxis, Aircraft, Aviation Safety.

0
Accordingly, 14 CFR parts 125 and 135 are corrected by making the 
following correcting amendments:

PART 125--CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS: AIRPLANES HAVING A SEATING 
CAPACITY OF 20 OR MORE PASSENGERS OR A MAXIMUM PAYLOAD CAPACITY OF 
6,000 POUNDS OR MORE; AND RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON BOARD SUCH 
AIRCRAFT

0
1. The authority citation for part 125 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44705, 44710-
44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722.

0
2. In Sec.  125.211, amend paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D) to read as follows:


Sec.  125.211  Seat and safety belts.

    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (D) Except as provided in Sec.  125.211(b)(2)(ii)(C)(3) and Sec.  
125.211(b)(2)(ii)(C)(4), booster-type child restraint systems (as 
defined in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 (49 CFR 
571.213)), vest- and harness-type child restraint systems, and lap held 
child restraints are not approved for use in aircraft; and
* * * * *

[[Page 59374]]

PART 135--OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND ON-DEMAND OPERATIONS 
AND RULES GOVERNING PERSONS ON BOARD SUCH AIRCRAFT

0
3. The authority citation for part 135 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 44113, 44701-44702, 44705, 44709, 
44711-44713, 44715-44717, 44722.
    4. In Sec.  135.128, amend paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(D) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  135.128  Use of safety belts and child restraint systems

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (D) Except as provided in Sec.  135.128(a)(2)(ii)(C)(3) and Sec.  
135.128(a)(2)(ii)(C)(4), booster-type child restraint systems (as 
defined in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 (49 CFR 
571.213)), vest- and harness-type child restraint systems, and lap held 
child restraints are not approved for use in aircraft; and
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 29, 2006.
Brenda D. Courtney,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
 [FR Doc. E6-16622 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P