Census Coverage Measurement Independent Listing and Relisting Operations, 59429-59430 [E6-16618]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
comment period so that comments and
objections are made available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
59429
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Dated: September 29, 2006.
Timothy A. Dabney,
Georgetown District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 06–8557 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
Census Coverage Measurement
Independent Listing and Relisting
Operations
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No.: 060615168–6243–02]
Privacy Act of 1974: System of
Records
Department of Commerce.
Final Notice to amend a Privacy
Act System of Records: COMMERCE/
DEPARTMENT–18, ‘‘Employees
Personnel Files Not Covered by Notices
of Other Agencies.’’
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) publishes this notice to
announce the amendment of a Privacy
Act System of Records notice entitled
COMMERCE/DEPARTMENT–18,
‘‘Employees Personnel Files Not
Covered by Notices of Other Agencies.’’
DATES: The system of records becomes
effective on October 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: For a copy of the system of
records please mail requests to Brenda
Dolan, Department of Commerce
Freedom of Information and Privacy Act
Officer, Room 5327, 1401 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
202–482–3258.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Dolan, Department of Commerce
Freedom of Information and Privacy Act
Officer, Room 5327, 1401 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
202–482–3258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6,
2006, the Commerce published and
requested comments on a proposed
amended Privacy Act System of Records
notice entitled COMMERCE/
DEPARTMENT–18, ‘‘Employees
Personnel Files Not Covered by Notices
of Other Agencies.’’ No comments were
received in response to the request for
comments. By this notice, the
Department is adopting the proposed
system as final without changes
effective October 10, 2006.
Dated: October 2, 2006.
Brenda Dolan,
Department of Commerce, Freedom of
Information and Privacy Act Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–16693 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–BW–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 11,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to
Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork
Clearance Officer, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
Dhynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Magdalena Ramos, U.S.
Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Rd.,
Room 4H265, Washington, DC 20233,
301–763–4295 (or via the Internet at
Magdalena.Ramos@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
In preparation for the 2010 Census,
the U.S. Census Bureau will conduct a
Census Coverage Measurement (CCM)
test as part of the 2008 Census Dress
Rehearsal. The 2008 Census Dress
Rehearsal will be conducted in two
sites, one urban, and the other one, a
mix of urban and suburban. San Joaquin
County, California is the urban site.
South Central North Carolina has been
selected as the urban/suburban mix test
site. This area consists of Fayetteville
and nine counties surrounding
Fayetteville (Chatham, Cumberland,
Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery,
Moore, Richmond, and Scotland). As is
typical, the CCM operations and
activities will be conducted separate
from and independent of the census
operations. The CCM program for the
dress rehearsal is designed to test that
all planned coverage measurement
operations are working as expected, that
they are integrated internally, and that
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
59430
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 10, 2006 / Notices
they are coordinated with the
appropriate census operations. This is
particularly important because the dress
rehearsal is the first time in the 2010
census cycle that CCM operations for
housing units will be conducted. The
CCM operations planned for the dress
rehearsal, to the extent possible, will
mirror those that will be conducted for
the 2010 Census to provide estimates of
net coverage error and coverage error
components (omissions and erroneous
enumerations) for housing units and
persons in housing units (see Definition
of Terms). The data collection and
matching methodologies for previous
coverage measurement programs were
designed only to measure net coverage
error, which reflects the difference
between omissions and erroneous
inclusions.
The Independent Listing Operation is
the first step in the CCM process. It will
be conducted to obtain a complete
housing unit inventory of all the
addresses within the CCM sample block
clusters before the 2008 Census Dress
Rehearsal enumeration commences. In
both dress rehearsal sites, enumerators
will canvass every street, road, or other
place where people might live in their
assigned block clusters and constructs a
list of housing units. Enumerators will
contact a member (or proxy) of each
housing unit to ensure all units at a
given address are identified. They also
identify the location of each housing
unit by assigning map spots on block
cluster maps provided with their
assignment materials. If an enumerator
is uncertain whether a particular living
quarters is a housing unit, it will be
listed and flagged for followup (this will
be a part of the Initial Housing Unit
Followup). Following the completion of
each block cluster, the listing books are
keyed for matching against the census
Decennial Master Address File (DMAF)
for the same areas.
Completed Independent Listing Books
are subject to Quality Control (QC)
wherein QC listers return to the field to
check 12 units per cluster to ensure that
the work performed is of acceptable
quality and to verify that the correct
blocks were visited. If the cluster fails
the QC, then the QC lister reworks the
entire cluster.
The Independent Listing results will
be computer and clerically matched to
the DMAF from the census in the same
areas. As the result of the matching an
additional relisting operation can occur
for block clusters suspected of high
levels of geocoding errors in the original
independent listing. The methods and
procedures for relisting will be the same
as those for the listing operation. There
will be one Independent Listing Form,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Oct 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
DX–1302, that will be used for listing,
QC, and relisting.
The addresses that remain unmatched
or unresolved after matching will be
sent to the field during the next field
operation of the CCM, Initial Housing
Unit Followup, to collect additional
information that might allow a
resolution of any differences between
the independent listing results and the
census DMAF. Cases will also be sent to
resolve potential duplicates and
unresolved housing unit/group quarter
status. The forms and procedures to be
used in the Initial Housing Unit
Followup phase of the CCM in the 2008
Census Dress Rehearsal and all
subsequent CCM phases will be
submitted separately.
II. Method of Collection
The independent listing and relisting
operations will be conducted using
person-to-person interviews.
Definition of Terms
Components of Coverage Error—The
two components of census coverage
error are census omissions (missed
persons or housing units) and erroneous
inclusions (persons or housing units
enumerated in the census that should
not have been). Examples of erroneous
inclusions are: persons or housing units
enumerated in the census that should
not have been enumerated at all,
persons or housing units enumerated in
an incorrect location, and persons or
housing units enumerated more than
once (duplicates).
Net Coverage Error—Reflects the
difference between census omissions
and erroneous inclusions. A positive net
error indicates an undercount, while a
negative net error indicates an
overcount.
For more information about the
Census 2000 Coverage Measurement
Program, please visit the following page
of the Census Bureau’s Web site:
https://www.census.gov/dmd/www/
refroom.html.
III. Data
OMB Number: Not available.
Form Number: DX–1302.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
40,000 Housing units (HUs) for
Independent Listing, 4,000 HUs for
Independent Listing QC, 400 HUs for
Relisting, and 40 HUs for Relisting QC.
Estimated Times per Response: 2
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,480.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated Total Annual Cost to the
Public: No cost to the respondent except
for their time to respond.
Respondent Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S. Code,
Sections 141, 193, and 221.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of the information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: October 3, 2007.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–16618 Filed 10–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–549–813)
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Canned
Pineapple Fruit from Thailand
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on canned pineapple fruit (CPF) from
Thailand. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006)
(Initiation Notice). In that notice, the
Department did not initiate a review of
Tropical Food Industries Co. Ltd.
(TROFCO) because the company’s
request for review was untimely filed.
After considering the facts on the
record, the Department is now initiating
a review of TROFCO.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 10, 2006.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59429-59430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16618]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Census Coverage Measurement Independent Listing and Relisting
Operations
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 11,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork
Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
Dhynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Magdalena Ramos, U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver
Hill Rd., Room 4H265, Washington, DC 20233, 301-763-4295 (or via the
Internet at Magdalena.Ramos@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
In preparation for the 2010 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau will
conduct a Census Coverage Measurement (CCM) test as part of the 2008
Census Dress Rehearsal. The 2008 Census Dress Rehearsal will be
conducted in two sites, one urban, and the other one, a mix of urban
and suburban. San Joaquin County, California is the urban site. South
Central North Carolina has been selected as the urban/suburban mix test
site. This area consists of Fayetteville and nine counties surrounding
Fayetteville (Chatham, Cumberland, Harnett, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery,
Moore, Richmond, and Scotland). As is typical, the CCM operations and
activities will be conducted separate from and independent of the
census operations. The CCM program for the dress rehearsal is designed
to test that all planned coverage measurement operations are working as
expected, that they are integrated internally, and that
[[Page 59430]]
they are coordinated with the appropriate census operations. This is
particularly important because the dress rehearsal is the first time in
the 2010 census cycle that CCM operations for housing units will be
conducted. The CCM operations planned for the dress rehearsal, to the
extent possible, will mirror those that will be conducted for the 2010
Census to provide estimates of net coverage error and coverage error
components (omissions and erroneous enumerations) for housing units and
persons in housing units (see Definition of Terms). The data collection
and matching methodologies for previous coverage measurement programs
were designed only to measure net coverage error, which reflects the
difference between omissions and erroneous inclusions.
The Independent Listing Operation is the first step in the CCM
process. It will be conducted to obtain a complete housing unit
inventory of all the addresses within the CCM sample block clusters
before the 2008 Census Dress Rehearsal enumeration commences. In both
dress rehearsal sites, enumerators will canvass every street, road, or
other place where people might live in their assigned block clusters
and constructs a list of housing units. Enumerators will contact a
member (or proxy) of each housing unit to ensure all units at a given
address are identified. They also identify the location of each housing
unit by assigning map spots on block cluster maps provided with their
assignment materials. If an enumerator is uncertain whether a
particular living quarters is a housing unit, it will be listed and
flagged for followup (this will be a part of the Initial Housing Unit
Followup). Following the completion of each block cluster, the listing
books are keyed for matching against the census Decennial Master
Address File (DMAF) for the same areas.
Completed Independent Listing Books are subject to Quality Control
(QC) wherein QC listers return to the field to check 12 units per
cluster to ensure that the work performed is of acceptable quality and
to verify that the correct blocks were visited. If the cluster fails
the QC, then the QC lister reworks the entire cluster.
The Independent Listing results will be computer and clerically
matched to the DMAF from the census in the same areas. As the result of
the matching an additional relisting operation can occur for block
clusters suspected of high levels of geocoding errors in the original
independent listing. The methods and procedures for relisting will be
the same as those for the listing operation. There will be one
Independent Listing Form, DX-1302, that will be used for listing, QC,
and relisting.
The addresses that remain unmatched or unresolved after matching
will be sent to the field during the next field operation of the CCM,
Initial Housing Unit Followup, to collect additional information that
might allow a resolution of any differences between the independent
listing results and the census DMAF. Cases will also be sent to resolve
potential duplicates and unresolved housing unit/group quarter status.
The forms and procedures to be used in the Initial Housing Unit
Followup phase of the CCM in the 2008 Census Dress Rehearsal and all
subsequent CCM phases will be submitted separately.
II. Method of Collection
The independent listing and relisting operations will be conducted
using person-to-person interviews.
Definition of Terms
Components of Coverage Error--The two components of census coverage
error are census omissions (missed persons or housing units) and
erroneous inclusions (persons or housing units enumerated in the census
that should not have been). Examples of erroneous inclusions are:
persons or housing units enumerated in the census that should not have
been enumerated at all, persons or housing units enumerated in an
incorrect location, and persons or housing units enumerated more than
once (duplicates).
Net Coverage Error--Reflects the difference between census
omissions and erroneous inclusions. A positive net error indicates an
undercount, while a negative net error indicates an overcount.
For more information about the Census 2000 Coverage Measurement
Program, please visit the following page of the Census Bureau's Web
site: https://www.census.gov/dmd/www/refroom.html.
III. Data
OMB Number: Not available.
Form Number: DX-1302.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 40,000 Housing units (HUs) for
Independent Listing, 4,000 HUs for Independent Listing QC, 400 HUs for
Relisting, and 40 HUs for Relisting QC.
Estimated Times per Response: 2 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,480.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Public: No cost to the
respondent except for their time to respond.
Respondent Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S. Code, Sections 141, 193, and 221.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: October 3, 2007.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6-16618 Filed 10-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P