Proposed Revocation of Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances, 59066-59069 [E6-16574]
Download as PDF
59066
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Point ID Number
1
2
3
4
Latitude
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
(3) The approximately six [6.0] NM2 area
off of Moss Landing Harbor from harbor
launch ramps, through harbor entrance, and
then along a 100 yard wide access route due
36.91667
36.91667
36.94167
36.94167
Latitude
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
(bell buoy) ...........................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
(4) The approximately five [5.0] NM2 area
off of Monterey Harbor from harbor launch
ramps to the seaward end of the U.S. Coast
Guard Pier, and then along a 100 yard wide
36.83333 °
36.83333
36.77833
36.77833
36.79833
36.81500
Latitude
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Appendix F to Subpart M of Part 922—
Davidson Seamount Management Zone
Longitude
¥121.82167
¥121.84667
¥121.84667
¥121.81667
¥121.80167
¥121.80333
access route due north to the southern
boundary of Zone Four bounded by:
Point ID Number
1
2
3
4
¥122.03333
¥121.96667
¥121.96667
¥122.03333
west to the eastern boundary of Zone Three
bounded by:
Point ID Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Longitude
36.64500
36.61500
36.63833
36.66667
Longitude
¥121.92333
¥121.87500
¥121.85500
¥121.90667
and are calculated using the North American
Datum of 1983]
[Coordinates in this appendix are
unprojected (Geographic Coordinate System)
Point ID Number
1
2
3
4
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
[FR Doc. E6–16338 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0213; FRL–7770–9]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Revocation of Significant
New Use Rules on Certain Chemical
Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Latitude
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke
significant new use rules (SNURs)
promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
for four chemical substances. The SNUR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
for the chemical substance covered by
premanufacture notice (PMN) P–98–475
designated certain activities as
significant new uses based on concerns
identified in a corresponding TSCA
section 5(e) consent order for that
chemical substance and pursuant to 40
CFR 721.160. For the chemical
substances covered by PMNs P–98–
1043, P–99–0467, and P–01–71, EPA
issued non-5(e) SNURs (i.e., SNURS on
substances that are not subject to TSCA
section 5(e) consent orders) designating
certain activities as significant new uses
based on the concern criteria in 40 CFR
721.170(b). EPA has received and
reviewed new information and test data
for each of the chemical substances, and
proposes to revoke the SNURs pursuant
to 40 CFR 721.185.
Comments must be received on
or before November 6, 2006.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35.90000
35.90000
35.50000
35.50000
Longitude
¥123.00000
¥122.50000
¥122.50000
¥123.00000
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0213, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0213.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2006–0213. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC).
The EPA/DC suffered structural damage
due to flooding in June 2006. Although
the EPA/DC is continuing operations,
there will be temporary changes to the
EPA/DC during the clean-up. The EPA/
DC Public Reading Room, which was
temporarily closed due to flooding, has
been relocated in the EPA Headquarters
Library, Infoterra Room (Room Number
3334) in the EPA West Bldg., located at
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number of the EPA/DC Public Reading
Room is (202) 566–1744, and the
telephone number for the OPPT Docket
is (202) 566–0280. EPA visitors are
required to show photographic
identification and sign the EPA visitor
log. Visitors to the EPA/DC Public
Reading Room will be provided with an
EPA/DC badge that must be visible at all
times while in the EPA Building and
returned to the guard upon departure. In
addition, security personnel will escort
visitors to and from the new EPA/DC
Public Reading Room location. Up-todate information about the EPA/DC is
on the EPA web site at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 554–1404; e-mail address:
TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact:
James Alwood, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (202) 564–
8974; e-mail address:
alwood.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use the chemical substances
contained in this proposed revocation.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Chemical manufacturers (NAICS
code 325), e.g., persons manufacturing,
importing, processing, or using
chemicals for commercial purposes.
• Petroleum and coal product
industries (NAICS code 324), e.g.,
persons manufacturing, importing,
processing, or using chemicals for
commercial purposes.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59067
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
40 CFR 721.5. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at the
estimate.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggested
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the documents that published in
the Federal Register of January 5, 2000
(65 FR 373, 374) (FRL–6055–2),
December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81400) (FRL–
6592–8), and December 17, 2003 (68 FR
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
59068
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
70179) (FRL–7307–3), EPA issued
separate SNURs for four separate
chemical substances. The SNUR for the
chemical substance covered by PMN P–
98–475 designated certain activities as
significant new uses based on concerns
identified in a corresponding TSCA
section 5(e) consent order for that
chemical substance and pursuant to 40
CFR 721.160. For the other three
chemical substances covered by PMNs
P–98–1043, P–99–0467, and P–01–71,
EPA issued non-5(e) SNURs designating
certain activities as significant new uses
based on the concern criteria identified
in 40 CFR 721.170(b). EPA has received
and reviewed new information and test
data for each of these four chemical
substances, and, based on that
information and test data, EPA now
proposes to revoke the SNURs pursuant
to 40 CFR 721.185. In this unit, EPA
provides a brief description for each
chemical substance, including its PMN
number, chemical name (generic name
if the specific name is claimed as CBI),
CAS number (if assigned and not
claimed as CBI), basis for the revocation
of the TSCA section 5(e) consent order,
if any, for the substance, the basis for
revoking the SNUR under 40 CFR
721.185, and the CFR citation of the
SNUR.
PMN Number P–98–475
Chemical name: Benzenesulfonic acid,
2,2′-[(1E)-1,2-ethenediyl] bis[5-[[4(methylamino)-6-[[4[(methylamino)carbonyl-phenyl]amino]1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-,disodium salt.
CAS number: 180850–95–7.
Federal Register publication date and
reference: January 5, 2000 (65 FR 373).
Docket number: OPPTS–50635.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA
issued a TSCA section 5(e) consent
order between EPA and the PMN
submitter for this substance based on a
potential unreasonable risk of
developmental and reproductive
toxicity of the PMN substance, based on
test data for the chemical category for
stilbene, derivatives of 4,4-bis(triazin-2ylamino)-. EPA also promulgated a
SNUR for this chemical substance
pursuant to 40 CFR 721.160.
Subsequently, an industry consortium
conducted a range-finding and
definitive 2-generation study in rats
(gavage) and range-finding and
definitive developmental toxicity
studies in rats and rabbits (gavage) for
C.I. Fluorescent Brightener 220 (CAS
No. 16470–24–9). Based on the results
of that testing, EPA has concluded that
available information does not support
continued identification of stilbenes as
a new chemical category presenting
concerns for possible developmental
and reproductive toxicity. Thus, EPA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
concludes that a rational basis no longer
exists for finding that activities
involving the chemical substance may
present an unreasonable risk of injury to
human health as required by section
5(e)(1)(A) of TSCA. Therefore, EPA has
revoked the consent order for P–98–475
and, pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(5),
proposes that the SNUR for this
chemical substance be revoked.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.9785.
PMN Number P–98–1043
Chemical name: Substituted amino
alkyl triazinyl benzenesulfonic acid
derivative (generic).
CAS number: CBI.
Federal Register publication date and
reference: January 5, 2000 (65 FR 374).
Docket number: OPPTS–50635.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA
issued a SNUR for this substance based
on the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(3)(ii). The PMN submitter
petitioned EPA to revoke the SNUR
based on the results of test data
developed by an industry consortium
which consisted of a range-finding and
definitive 2-generation study in rats
(gavage) and range-finding and
definitive developmental toxicity
studies in rats and rabbits (gavage) for
C.I. Fluorescent Brightener 220 (CAS
No. 16470–24–9). EPA has concluded
that available information does not
support continued identification of
stilbenes as a new chemical category
presenting concerns for possible
developmental and reproductive
toxicity and that, based on available
information, the substance no longer
meets the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(3)(ii). Therefore, EPA
proposes that the SNUR for this
chemical substance be revoked pursuant
to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.9810.
PMN Number P–99–0467
Chemical name: Acrylated (longchainalkyl) glycidal ether (generic).
CAS number: CBI.
Federal Register publication date and
reference: December 26, 2000 (65 FR
81400).
Docket number: OPPTS–50638.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA
issued a SNUR for this substance based
on the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(4)(ii). Subsequently, the
PMN submitter petitioned EPA to
revoke the SNUR based on the results of
acute aquatic toxicity test data for fish,
daphnia, and algae, as well as the
results of biodegradation testing. The
toxicity testing demonstrated concerns
for potential chronic environmental
toxicity at concentrations as low as 2
parts per billion (ppb). However,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
biodegradation testing demonstrated
that the substance is readily
biodegradable, mitigating concerns for
chronic toxicity. Therefore, EPA no
longer finds that releases to water
resulting in stream concentrations
greater than 2 ppb may cause significant
adverse environmental effects.
Therefore, based on available
information, the substance no longer
meets the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(4)(ii) and EPA proposes
that the SNUR for this chemical
substance be revoked pursuant to 40
CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.3850.
PMN Number P–01–71
Chemical name: Phenol, 2,2′-[6-(2,4dibutoxyphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4diyl]bis[5-butoxy-.
CAS number: 208343–47–9.
Federal Register publication date and
reference: December 17, 2003 (68 FR
70179).
Docket number: OPPT–2002–0078.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA
issued a SNUR for this substance based
on the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(4)(ii). Subsequently, the
PMN submitter petitioned EPA to
revoke the SNUR based on the results of
chronic fish and daphnia testing. The
toxicity testing demonstrated that there
were no effects at saturation (i.e., the
maximum concentration at which the
PMN substance can be dissolved in
water). A concentration of concern was
not established. The substance was
determined to pose low concern for
environmental toxicity, and has a low
‘‘persistence, bioaccumulation, and
toxicity’’ (PBT) rating of P2B1T1 (on a
scale of 1 to 3, with 3 being the highest).
Therefore, EPA no longer finds that
releases to water may result in
exposures which may cause significant
adverse environmental effects.
Therefore, based on available
information, the substance no longer
meets the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(4)(ii) and EPA proposes
that the SNUR for this chemical
substance be revoked pursuant to 40
CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.5718.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including those listed in section 5(a)(2)
of TSCA. Once EPA determines that a
use of a chemical substance is a
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
significant new use, section 5(a)(1)(B) of
TSCA requires persons to submit a
notice to EPA at least 90 days before
they manufacture, import, or process the
substance for that use. The mechanism
for reporting under this requirement is
established under 40 CFR part 721.
During a review of PMN P–98–475,
EPA concluded that regulation was
warranted and issued a TSCA section
5(e) consent order for the chemical
substance and promulgated a
corresponding SNUR under 40 CFR
721.160. Upon conclusion of the
reviews of PMNs P–98–1043, P–99–
0467, and P–01–71, based on the
concern criteria in 40 CFR
721.170(b)(3)(ii) or (b)(4)(ii) as discussed
in Unit II.A., EPA determined that there
was a concern about the substances’
health or environmental effects and
promulgated non-5(e) SNURs for these
chemical substances.
Under 40 CFR 721.185, EPA may at
any time revoke a SNUR for a chemical
substance which has been added to
subpart E of 40 CFR part 721 if EPA
makes one of the determinations set
forth in § 721.185(a)(1) through (a)(6).
Revocation may occur at EPA’s
initiative or in response to a written
request. Under § 721.185(b)(3), if EPA
concludes that a SNUR should be
revoked, the Agency will propose the
changes in the Federal Register, briefly
describe the grounds for the action and
provide interested parties an
opportunity to comment.
EPA has determined that the criteria
set forth in § 721.185(a) have been
satisfied for each of the four chemical
substances, and therefore EPA is
proposing to revoke the SNUR
provisions for these chemical
substances. When this revocation
becomes final, EPA will no longer
require notice of intent to manufacture,
import, or process these substances for
any significant new uses. In addition,
export notification requirements under
section 12(b) of TSCA triggered by these
SNURs will no longer be required.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This proposed rule revokes or
eliminates an existing regulatory
requirement and does not contain any
new or amended requirements. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
SNUR revocation will not have any
adverse impacts, economic or otherwise.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
regulatory actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). This proposed
rule does not contain any information
collections subject to approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Since this proposed
rule eliminates a reporting requirement,
the Agency certifies pursuant to section
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that this
SNUR revocation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the same reasons, this action does
not require any action under Title II of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104–4). This
proposed rule has neither Federalism
implications, because it will not have
substantial direct effects on States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), nor tribal implications, because it
will not have substantial direct effects
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000).
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59069
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined under Executive Order
12866, and it does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children. It
is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. Because this action
does not involve any technical
standards, section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
does not apply to this action. This
action does not involve special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as required by Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 26, 2006.
Charles M. Auer,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
part 721 be amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
§§ 721.3850, 721.5718, 721.9785, and
721.9810 [Removed]
2. Remove §§ 721.3850, 721.5718,
721.9785, and 721.9810.
[FR Doc. E6–16574 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59066-59069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16574]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0213; FRL-7770-9]
RIN 2070-AB27
Proposed Revocation of Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke significant new use rules (SNURs)
promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) for four chemical substances. The SNUR for the chemical
substance covered by premanufacture notice (PMN) P-98-475 designated
certain activities as significant new uses based on concerns identified
in a corresponding TSCA section 5(e) consent order for that chemical
substance and pursuant to 40 CFR 721.160. For the chemical substances
covered by PMNs P-98-1043, P-99-0467, and P-01-71, EPA issued non-5(e)
SNURs (i.e., SNURS on substances that are not subject to TSCA section
5(e) consent orders) designating certain activities as significant new
uses based on the concern criteria in 40 CFR 721.170(b). EPA has
received and reviewed new information and test data for each of the
chemical substances, and proposes to revoke the SNURs pursuant to 40
CFR 721.185.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0213, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
Attention: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0213. The DCO is open from
8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
[[Page 59067]]
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2006-0213. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information
is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the
OPPT Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC). The EPA/DC suffered structural
damage due to flooding in June 2006. Although the EPA/DC is continuing
operations, there will be temporary changes to the EPA/DC during the
clean-up. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room, which was temporarily closed
due to flooding, has been relocated in the EPA Headquarters Library,
Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334) in the EPA West Bldg., located at
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is (202) 566-0280. EPA visitors are required to show
photographic identification and sign the EPA visitor log. Visitors to
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room will be provided with an EPA/DC badge
that must be visible at all times while in the EPA Building and
returned to the guard upon departure. In addition, security personnel
will escort visitors to and from the new EPA/DC Public Reading Room
location. Up-to-date information about the EPA/DC is on the EPA web
site at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-
Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact: James Alwood, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8974; e-mail
address: alwood.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use the chemical substances contained in this
proposed revocation. Potentially affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
Chemical manufacturers (NAICS code 325), e.g., persons
manufacturing, importing, processing, or using chemicals for commercial
purposes.
Petroleum and coal product industries (NAICS code 324),
e.g., persons manufacturing, importing, processing, or using chemicals
for commercial purposes.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in 40 CFR 721.5. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at the estimate.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggested alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the documents that published in the Federal Register of January
5, 2000 (65 FR 373, 374) (FRL-6055-2), December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81400)
(FRL-6592-8), and December 17, 2003 (68 FR
[[Page 59068]]
70179) (FRL-7307-3), EPA issued separate SNURs for four separate
chemical substances. The SNUR for the chemical substance covered by PMN
P-98-475 designated certain activities as significant new uses based on
concerns identified in a corresponding TSCA section 5(e) consent order
for that chemical substance and pursuant to 40 CFR 721.160. For the
other three chemical substances covered by PMNs P-98-1043, P-99-0467,
and P-01-71, EPA issued non-5(e) SNURs designating certain activities
as significant new uses based on the concern criteria identified in 40
CFR 721.170(b). EPA has received and reviewed new information and test
data for each of these four chemical substances, and, based on that
information and test data, EPA now proposes to revoke the SNURs
pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185. In this unit, EPA provides a brief
description for each chemical substance, including its PMN number,
chemical name (generic name if the specific name is claimed as CBI),
CAS number (if assigned and not claimed as CBI), basis for the
revocation of the TSCA section 5(e) consent order, if any, for the
substance, the basis for revoking the SNUR under 40 CFR 721.185, and
the CFR citation of the SNUR.
PMN Number P-98-475
Chemical name: Benzenesulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(1E)-1,2-ethenediyl] bis[5-
[[4-(methylamino)-6-[[4-[(methylamino)carbonyl-phenyl]amino]-1,3,5-
triazin-2-yl]amino]-,disodium salt.
CAS number: 180850-95-7.
Federal Register publication date and reference: January 5, 2000 (65 FR
373).
Docket number: OPPTS-50635.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA issued a TSCA section 5(e) consent
order between EPA and the PMN submitter for this substance based on a
potential unreasonable risk of developmental and reproductive toxicity
of the PMN substance, based on test data for the chemical category for
stilbene, derivatives of 4,4-bis(triazin-2-ylamino)-. EPA also
promulgated a SNUR for this chemical substance pursuant to 40 CFR
721.160. Subsequently, an industry consortium conducted a range-finding
and definitive 2-generation study in rats (gavage) and range-finding
and definitive developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits
(gavage) for C.I. Fluorescent Brightener 220 (CAS No. 16470-24-9).
Based on the results of that testing, EPA has concluded that available
information does not support continued identification of stilbenes as a
new chemical category presenting concerns for possible developmental
and reproductive toxicity. Thus, EPA concludes that a rational basis no
longer exists for finding that activities involving the chemical
substance may present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health as
required by section 5(e)(1)(A) of TSCA. Therefore, EPA has revoked the
consent order for P-98-475 and, pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(5),
proposes that the SNUR for this chemical substance be revoked.
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.9785.
PMN Number P-98-1043
Chemical name: Substituted amino alkyl triazinyl benzenesulfonic acid
derivative (generic).
CAS number: CBI.
Federal Register publication date and reference: January 5, 2000 (65 FR
374).
Docket number: OPPTS-50635.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA issued a SNUR for this substance
based on the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(3)(ii). The PMN
submitter petitioned EPA to revoke the SNUR based on the results of
test data developed by an industry consortium which consisted of a
range-finding and definitive 2-generation study in rats (gavage) and
range-finding and definitive developmental toxicity studies in rats and
rabbits (gavage) for C.I. Fluorescent Brightener 220 (CAS No. 16470-24-
9). EPA has concluded that available information does not support
continued identification of stilbenes as a new chemical category
presenting concerns for possible developmental and reproductive
toxicity and that, based on available information, the substance no
longer meets the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Therefore, EPA proposes that the SNUR for this chemical substance be
revoked pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.9810.
PMN Number P-99-0467
Chemical name: Acrylated (long-chainalkyl) glycidal ether (generic).
CAS number: CBI.
Federal Register publication date and reference: December 26, 2000 (65
FR 81400).
Docket number: OPPTS-50638.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA issued a SNUR for this substance
based on the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(4)(ii). Subsequently,
the PMN submitter petitioned EPA to revoke the SNUR based on the
results of acute aquatic toxicity test data for fish, daphnia, and
algae, as well as the results of biodegradation testing. The toxicity
testing demonstrated concerns for potential chronic environmental
toxicity at concentrations as low as 2 parts per billion (ppb).
However, biodegradation testing demonstrated that the substance is
readily biodegradable, mitigating concerns for chronic toxicity.
Therefore, EPA no longer finds that releases to water resulting in
stream concentrations greater than 2 ppb may cause significant adverse
environmental effects. Therefore, based on available information, the
substance no longer meets the concern criteria at Sec.
721.170(b)(4)(ii) and EPA proposes that the SNUR for this chemical
substance be revoked pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.3850.
PMN Number P-01-71
Chemical name: Phenol, 2,2'-[6-(2,4-dibutoxyphenyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-
diyl]bis[5-butoxy-.
CAS number: 208343-47-9.
Federal Register publication date and reference: December 17, 2003 (68
FR 70179).
Docket number: OPPT-2002-0078.
Basis for revocation of SNUR: EPA issued a SNUR for this substance
based on the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(4)(ii). Subsequently,
the PMN submitter petitioned EPA to revoke the SNUR based on the
results of chronic fish and daphnia testing. The toxicity testing
demonstrated that there were no effects at saturation (i.e., the
maximum concentration at which the PMN substance can be dissolved in
water). A concentration of concern was not established. The substance
was determined to pose low concern for environmental toxicity, and has
a low ``persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity'' (PBT) rating of
P2B1T1 (on a scale of 1 to 3, with 3 being the highest). Therefore, EPA
no longer finds that releases to water may result in exposures which
may cause significant adverse environmental effects. Therefore, based
on available information, the substance no longer meets the concern
criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(4)(ii) and EPA proposes that the SNUR for
this chemical substance be revoked pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185(a)(4).
CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.5718.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including those listed in section 5(a)(2) of TSCA.
Once EPA determines that a use of a chemical substance is a
[[Page 59069]]
significant new use, section 5(a)(1)(B) of TSCA requires persons to
submit a notice to EPA at least 90 days before they manufacture,
import, or process the substance for that use. The mechanism for
reporting under this requirement is established under 40 CFR part 721.
During a review of PMN P-98-475, EPA concluded that regulation was
warranted and issued a TSCA section 5(e) consent order for the chemical
substance and promulgated a corresponding SNUR under 40 CFR 721.160.
Upon conclusion of the reviews of PMNs P-98-1043, P-99-0467, and P-01-
71, based on the concern criteria in 40 CFR 721.170(b)(3)(ii) or
(b)(4)(ii) as discussed in Unit II.A., EPA determined that there was a
concern about the substances' health or environmental effects and
promulgated non-5(e) SNURs for these chemical substances.
Under 40 CFR 721.185, EPA may at any time revoke a SNUR for a
chemical substance which has been added to subpart E of 40 CFR part 721
if EPA makes one of the determinations set forth in Sec. 721.185(a)(1)
through (a)(6). Revocation may occur at EPA's initiative or in response
to a written request. Under Sec. 721.185(b)(3), if EPA concludes that
a SNUR should be revoked, the Agency will propose the changes in the
Federal Register, briefly describe the grounds for the action and
provide interested parties an opportunity to comment.
EPA has determined that the criteria set forth in Sec. 721.185(a)
have been satisfied for each of the four chemical substances, and
therefore EPA is proposing to revoke the SNUR provisions for these
chemical substances. When this revocation becomes final, EPA will no
longer require notice of intent to manufacture, import, or process
these substances for any significant new uses. In addition, export
notification requirements under section 12(b) of TSCA triggered by
these SNURs will no longer be required.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This proposed rule revokes or eliminates an existing regulatory
requirement and does not contain any new or amended requirements. As
such, the Agency has determined that this SNUR revocation will not have
any adverse impacts, economic or otherwise.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of regulatory actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). This
proposed rule does not contain any information collections subject to
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.). Since this proposed rule eliminates a reporting requirement, the
Agency certifies pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that this SNUR revocation
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
For the same reasons, this action does not require any action under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). This proposed rule has neither Federalism implications, because
it will not have substantial direct effects on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), nor tribal implications, because it
will not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes,
on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order
13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000).
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined under Executive Order 12866,
and it does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children. It is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because this action is not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. Because this action does not involve any
technical standards, section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this action. This action does
not involve special considerations of environmental justice related
issues as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 26, 2006.
Charles M. Auer,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 721 be amended as
follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
Sec. Sec. 721.3850, 721.5718, 721.9785, and 721.9810 [Removed]
2. Remove Sec. Sec. 721.3850, 721.5718, 721.9785, and 721.9810.
[FR Doc. E6-16574 Filed 10-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S