Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for a Performance-Based, Multi-Site License for a Uranium Water Treatment Program for R.M.D. Operations, LLC Headquarters in Wheat Ridge, CO, 59138-59140 [E6-16563]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
59138
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Notices
following general requirements: (1) The
name, address and telephone number of
the requestor or petitioner; (2) the
nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s
right under the Act to be made a party
to the proceeding; (3) the nature and
extent of the requestor’s/petitioner’s
property, financial, or other interest in
the proceeding; and (4) the possible
effect of any decision or order which
may be entered in the proceeding on the
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The
petition must also identify the specific
contentions which the petitioner/
requestor seeks to have litigated at the
proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a
specific statement of the issue of law or
fact to be raised or controverted. In
addition, the petitioner/requestor shall
provide a brief explanation of the bases
for the contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention
and on which the petitioner intends to
rely in proving the contention at the
hearing. The petitioner/requestor must
also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the
petitioner/requestor is aware and on
which the petitioner/requestor intends
to rely to establish those facts or expert
opinion. The petitioner/requestor must
provide sufficient information to show
that a genuine dispute exists with the
applicant on a material issue of law or
fact. Contentions shall be limited to
matters within the scope of the
amendment under consideration. The
contention must be one which, if
proven, would entitle the petitioner/
requestor to relief. A petitioner/
requestor who fails to satisfy these
requirements with respect to at least one
contention will not be permitted to
participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become
parties to the proceeding, subject to any
limitations in the order granting leave to
intervene, and have the opportunity to
participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
If a hearing is requested, the
Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to decide
when the hearing is held. If the final
determination is that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards
consideration, the Commission may
issue the amendment and make it
immediately effective, notwithstanding
the request for a hearing. Any hearing
held would take place after issuance of
the amendment. If the final
determination is that the amendment
request involves a significant hazards
consideration, any hearing held would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
take place before the issuance of any
amendment.
Nontimely requests and/or petitions
and contentions will not be entertained
absent a determination by the
Commission or the presiding officer of
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
that the petition, request and/or the
contentions should be granted based on
a balancing of the factors specified in 10
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii).
A request for a hearing or a petition
for leave to intervene must be filed by:
(1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (2) courier, express
mail, and expedited delivery services:
Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852,
Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (3) E-mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV; or (4)
facsimile transmission addressed to the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC, Attention: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff at (301) 415–1101,
verification number is (301) 415–1966.
A copy of the request for hearing and
petition for leave to intervene should
also be sent to the Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, and it is requested that copies be
transmitted either by means of facsimile
transmission to 301–415–3725 or by email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy
of the request for hearing and petition
for leave to intervene should also be
sent to John O’Neill, Esq., Pillsbury
Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, 2300 N
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037,
attorney for the licensee.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated September 20, 2006,
which is available for public inspection
at the Commission’s Public Document
Room (PDR), located at One White Flint
North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System’s (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm.html. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of October 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jack Donohew,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–16564 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 40–9059]
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for a PerformanceBased, Multi-Site License for a
Uranium Water Treatment Program for
R.M.D. Operations, LLC Headquarters
in Wheat Ridge, CO
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
Ron
C. Linton, Project Manager, Fuel Cycle
Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle
Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555. Telephone:
(301) 415–7777; fax number: (301) 415–
5955; e-mail: rcll@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of a 10 CFR part 40 source
materials license to R.M.D. Operations,
LLC (RMD). If issued, the license would
authorize RMD to act as a multi-site
service provider for community water
systems (CWSs) that concentrate
uranium above specified levels during
the treatment of drinking water. The
NRC has prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) in support of the
proposed licensing action in accordance
with the requirements of Title 10, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 51.
Based on the EA, the NRC has
concluded that a Finding of No
Significant Impact is appropriate. The
health and safety aspects of the
proposed action are being evaluated,
and no action will be taken until that
evaluation is completed.
II. EA Summary
More than 30 years ago, the United
States Congress enacted the Safe
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
Regulations promulgated pursuant to
the SDWA impose specific requirements
on the levels of contaminants (including
uranium) that may be present in
drinking water sources used for public
consumption in CWSs. In 1990, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated a proposed rule mandating
that the levels of uranium in drinking
water sources (i.e., maximum
contaminant levels (MCLs)) be limited
to 20 micrograms/liter (µg/L) or 20 parts
per billion (ppb). In 2000, EPA
promulgated a final uranium MCL of 30
µg/L, or 30 ppb and imposed strict
deadlines for compliance. The rule
requires that municipalities and other
operators (now estimated at 1000–2000)
must comply with these new
requirements by 2007.
The removal and concentration of
uranium by a CWS during its treatment
of drinking water, in order to meet the
EPA uranium standard, could result in:
(1) The CWS being in possession of
source material 1 (uranium) exceeding
0.05 percent by weight of the mixture;
and (2) the CWS possessing greater than
15 pounds of uranium at a time. A CWS
possessing uranium in these amounts
would need an NRC license, and a
separate rulemaking is underway to
create a new general NRC license to
cover such CWSs.
RMD has requested a specific NRC
license that would authorize RMD to: (1)
Possess uranium; (2) store uranium
residuals at CWSs in a self-contained
uranium removal system (URS) using
ion exchange technology; and (3)
transfer and properly disposition such
uranium residuals at facilities licensed
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
as amended (AEA). As described in the
EA, final disposition of uranium
residuals will either be as a waste in
AEA-licensed facilities, or as an
alternate feed for producing
‘‘yellowcake’’ at AEA-licensed uranium
recovery facilities for introduction into
the commercial nuclear fuel cycle. Once
used as alternate feed material, the
resulting waste may be disposed of as
byproduct material 2 in an 11(e)2
disposal cell. The RMD uranium water
1 Source material is defined in 10 CFR 40.4,
‘‘Definitions,’’ as ‘‘(1) uranium or thorium, or any
combination thereof, in any physical or chemical
form, or (2) ores which contain by weight 0.05
percent or more of uranium, thorium or any
combination thereof.’’
2 The definition of ‘‘byproduct material’’ in 10
CFR 40.4 states, in relevant part, that the term
‘‘means the tailings or wastes produced by the
extraction or concentration of uranium or thorium
from any ore processed primarily for its source
material content.’’ NRC guidance allows byproduct
material from alternate feed to be disposed of in an
11(e)2 disposal cell (NUREG–1620, Appendix I).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
treatment program is designed to
provide CWSs with the capability to
safely collect, store and transfer
uranium accumulated during the
treatment of drinking water.
The RMD September 27, 2005 license
application seeks NRC authorization
allowing RMD to implement its program
at CWSs who decide to enter into
contracts with RMD. As an NRC
licensee, RMD would have ownership
and/or control of its URS, and would
possess all licensed materials contained
therein, including uranium source
material collected by any CWS for
which RMD is acting as a service
provider.
The following resources areas were
evaluated in the EA: land use; geology
and soils; transportation; water
resources; ecology; meteorology and air
quality; noise and visual/scenic
resources; historical and cultural
resources; socioeconomic conditions;
public and occupational health; and
waste management. In all cases the
environmental impacts on these areas
were found to be small.
The URSs to be installed by RMD
would be sited at either existing CWS
facilities or in small utility-type sheds
near CWS well heads. Only minor land
disturbances associated with
construction activities for small
buildings and utilities, less than 10,000
square feet in width and less than 5 feet
in depth, are expected. The CWS would
be required to obtain all local building
permits and meet local requirements to
reduce sedimentation from construction
related activities prior to construction.
The operations of the URS would
utilize the same roads that the CWS
currently uses for receiving supplies for
typical water treatment operations (e.g.,
treatment chemicals, maintenance
equipment, and waste products, etc.).
Resin or exchange media loaded with
uranium from the ion exchange vessel
will be transported to either an
appropriately authorized disposal
facility or a licensed uranium mill for
use as alternate feed material. Material
will be transported in either U.S.
Department of Transportation-approved
(DOT) tanker trucks or large polyfabric
‘‘Super Sacks’’ that have been approved
for transport of radioactive material.
RMD expects 200 trips per year, per
1000 facilities served. Based on accident
statistics, and an average nationwide
travel distance of 1000 miles to the site
of final disposition, RMD expects an
accident, involving a spent treatment
media shipment, to occur only once
every 2.5 years. These accident statistics
do not estimate the severity of the
accident and consequences could range
from a severe accident to a minor
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59139
incident. Even if a small number of
these accidents were to occur, it would
not be expected that they will result in
any release. If uranium bearing resins
were to be spilled in a transportation
accident, resulting radiation doses to
members of the public were found to be,
in general, negligible and in the range of
background variability. RMD will be
required to develop standard operating
procedures to respond to and clean up
transportation related spills of
radioactive material.
The URS will be housed in a
treatment shed or within the existing
CWS. If the URS is housed in a CWS
with a floor drain, sump, or similar
water catchment that leads to a sewer or
drain field, a secondary containment
system will be required to ensure that
radioactive material cannot be released.
The URS will remove uranium from
groundwater being supplied to the
public at each CWS served. Such
removal of uranium will reduce human
exposure and potential health impacts
arising from the presence of uranium in
public drinking water supplies.
If a utility-type shed is required to be
constructed to house a URS, there could
be impacts to wildlife or historic
structures in the area. RMD will be
required to consult with Federal or State
wildlife agencies and State Historic
Preservation Officers before beginning
construction related to, or the use of, a
URS that is located outside of, or away
from, existing CWS structures. Noise
and visual impacts from the URS would
be similar to what already exists from a
CWS. Costs of the URS system may be
passed along to the consumer in the
form of higher water rates. Any rate
increases would likely only affect rate
paying consumers and not the general
public. Decommissioning of the URS
will be RMD’s responsibility and RMD
will be required to comply with NRC’s
financial assurance criteria.
Public access to the URS will be
restricted. The URS will be required to
be housed in a locked shed, structure,
or within the CWS facility and /or be
within a fenced in area and properly
marked. This should prevent any
exposures to the public from the URS.
However, if a member of the public
were to gain entry and come in contact
with the URS, exposure on contact to
the ion exchange vessel is expected to
be no greater than 0.3 mrem/hr. Since
the URS will likely be inspected on a
daily basis, it is likely that exposures
from an unauthorized entry would be no
greater than 7.2 mrem for a 24-hour
period, a minor exposure. If the
individual were in the building for that
time and remained 30 cm away from the
vessel—a more likely scenario-the
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
59140
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 194 / Friday, October 6, 2006 / Notices
exposure rate would be 0.003 mrem/hr,
which would equate to an exposure of
0.072 mrem in a 24-hour period, a very
minor exposure.
RMD system specialists, the local
utility managers and operators are not
expected to receive annual radiation
doses anywhere near the individual
monitoring thresholds prescribed in 10
CFR 20.1502, ‘‘Conditions Requiring
Individual Monitoring of External and
Internal Occupational Dose.’’ These
aforementioned thresholds are 500
mrem/yr for adults or 100 mrem/yr for
children or pregnant women. RMD has
estimated maximum dose rates on the
sides of the tanks to be between 0.2 to
0.3 mrem/hr and only 0.003 mrem/hr at
30 centimeters. RMD provided estimates
of time operators should spend in the
proximity of the vessels. The tables
showed a maximum of 100 hours/year
for the operational personnel. That time
would result in an exposure of only 3
mrem for the year. This is a small
fraction of the 340 mrem of background
radiation those same individuals receive
from natural sources. To ensure that
source material is handled in a proper
manner, uranium-laden (spent) IX resin
is not to be stored at the CWS for greater
than 60 days and will only be contained
within the IX vessel.
Spent uranium-laden resin will be
periodically removed from the URS and
transported to a licensed waste
management facility or used as alternate
feed at a licensed uranium recovery
facility. Use of either disposal method
will result in a small increase in waste
material. If uranium-laden resin is used
as an alternate feed material for uranium
recovery facilities, the uranium removed
from drinking water may enter the
nuclear fuel cycle and may ultimately
be used for domestic power generation.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the EA, NRC has
concluded that there are no significant
environmental impacts from the
proposed licensing action, and NRC
staff has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including RMD’s license application
and supporting documentation, are
available electronically at NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this site, you can access NRC’s
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. The ADAMS
accession numbers for the documents
related to this notice are as follows:
ADAMS Accession No.
Document
Final Environmental Assessment for Proposed Performance-Based, Multi-site License for a Uranium Water Treatment Program NRC License No. SUB-(TBD) R.M.D. Operations, LLC.
NUREG–1620, Rev. 1, Standard Review Plan for the Review of a Reclamation Plan for Mill
Tailings Sites Under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978—Final
Report, ‘‘Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
NUREG–1748, ‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated With NMSS
Programs—Final Report,’’ Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
R.M.D. Operations, LLC License Application for Performance-Based, Multi-Site License for Uranium Water Treatment Program.
R.M.D. Operations, LLC Environmental Report in Support of a Performance-based, Multi-site License Application (non-proprietary).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of September, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ron C. Linton,
Project Manager, Uranium Processing
Section, Fuel Cycle Facilities Branch, Division
of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6–16563 Filed 10–5–06; 8:45 am]
I
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[EA–06–203]
In the Matter of All Licensees Identified
in Attachment 1 (Redacted) and All
Other Persons Who Seek or Obtain
Access to Safeguards Information
Described Herein, Order Imposing
Fingerprinting and Criminal History
Records Check Requirements for
Access to Safeguards Information
(Effective Immediately)
The Licensees identified in
Attachment 11 to this Order hold
licenses issued in accordance with the
Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954, as
amended, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) or
Agreement States, authorizing them to
engage in an activity subject to
regulation by the Commission or
Agreement States. On August 8, 2005,
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct)
1 Attachment 1 contains sensitive information
and will not be released to the public.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Oct 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date
ML062490415
September 5, 2006.
ML032250190
June 30, 2003.
ML031000403
April 10, 2003.
ML052730008
September 27, 2005.
ML062440255
September 27, 2005.
was enacted. Section 652 of the EPAct
amended Section 149 of the AEA to
require fingerprinting and a Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
identification and criminal history
records check of any person who is to
be permitted to have access to
Safeguards Information (SGI) 2. The
NRC’s implementation of this
requirement cannot await the
completion of the SGI rulemaking,
which is underway, because the EPAct
fingerprinting and criminal history
records check requirements for access to
SGI were immediately effective upon
enactment of the EPAct. Although the
EPAct permits the Commission by rule
to except certain categories of
individuals from the fingerprinting
requirement, which the Commission has
done (see 10 CFR 73.59, 71 FR 33,989
(June 13, 2006)), it is unlikely that
licensee employees or others are
excepted from the fingerprinting
requirement by the ‘‘fingerprinting
2 Safeguards Information is a form of sensitive,
unclassified, security-related information that the
Commission has the authority to designate and
protect under section 147 of the AEA.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 194 (Friday, October 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59138-59140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 40-9059]
Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact for a Performance-Based, Multi-Site License for a
Uranium Water Treatment Program for R.M.D. Operations, LLC Headquarters
in Wheat Ridge, CO
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron C. Linton, Project Manager, Fuel
Cycle Facilities Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Telephone: (301) 415-7777;
fax number: (301) 415-5955; e-mail: rcll@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of a 10 CFR part 40 source materials license to R.M.D.
Operations, LLC (RMD). If issued, the license would authorize RMD to
act as a multi-site service provider for community water systems (CWSs)
that concentrate uranium above specified levels during the treatment of
drinking water. The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA)
in support of the proposed licensing action in accordance with the
requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 51.
Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant
Impact is appropriate. The health and safety aspects of the proposed
action are being evaluated, and no action will be taken until that
evaluation is completed.
II. EA Summary
More than 30 years ago, the United States Congress enacted the Safe
[[Page 59139]]
Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Regulations promulgated pursuant to the SDWA
impose specific requirements on the levels of contaminants (including
uranium) that may be present in drinking water sources used for public
consumption in CWSs. In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) promulgated a proposed rule mandating that the levels of uranium
in drinking water sources (i.e., maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)) be
limited to 20 micrograms/liter ([mu]g/L) or 20 parts per billion (ppb).
In 2000, EPA promulgated a final uranium MCL of 30 [mu]g/L, or 30 ppb
and imposed strict deadlines for compliance. The rule requires that
municipalities and other operators (now estimated at 1000-2000) must
comply with these new requirements by 2007.
The removal and concentration of uranium by a CWS during its
treatment of drinking water, in order to meet the EPA uranium standard,
could result in: (1) The CWS being in possession of source material \1\
(uranium) exceeding 0.05 percent by weight of the mixture; and (2) the
CWS possessing greater than 15 pounds of uranium at a time. A CWS
possessing uranium in these amounts would need an NRC license, and a
separate rulemaking is underway to create a new general NRC license to
cover such CWSs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Source material is defined in 10 CFR 40.4, ``Definitions,''
as ``(1) uranium or thorium, or any combination thereof, in any
physical or chemical form, or (2) ores which contain by weight 0.05
percent or more of uranium, thorium or any combination thereof.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RMD has requested a specific NRC license that would authorize RMD
to: (1) Possess uranium; (2) store uranium residuals at CWSs in a self-
contained uranium removal system (URS) using ion exchange technology;
and (3) transfer and properly disposition such uranium residuals at
facilities licensed under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(AEA). As described in the EA, final disposition of uranium residuals
will either be as a waste in AEA-licensed facilities, or as an
alternate feed for producing ``yellowcake'' at AEA-licensed uranium
recovery facilities for introduction into the commercial nuclear fuel
cycle. Once used as alternate feed material, the resulting waste may be
disposed of as byproduct material \2\ in an 11(e)2 disposal cell. The
RMD uranium water treatment program is designed to provide CWSs with
the capability to safely collect, store and transfer uranium
accumulated during the treatment of drinking water.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The definition of ``byproduct material'' in 10 CFR 40.4
states, in relevant part, that the term ``means the tailings or
wastes produced by the extraction or concentration of uranium or
thorium from any ore processed primarily for its source material
content.'' NRC guidance allows byproduct material from alternate
feed to be disposed of in an 11(e)2 disposal cell (NUREG-1620,
Appendix I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The RMD September 27, 2005 license application seeks NRC
authorization allowing RMD to implement its program at CWSs who decide
to enter into contracts with RMD. As an NRC licensee, RMD would have
ownership and/or control of its URS, and would possess all licensed
materials contained therein, including uranium source material
collected by any CWS for which RMD is acting as a service provider.
The following resources areas were evaluated in the EA: land use;
geology and soils; transportation; water resources; ecology;
meteorology and air quality; noise and visual/scenic resources;
historical and cultural resources; socioeconomic conditions; public and
occupational health; and waste management. In all cases the
environmental impacts on these areas were found to be small.
The URSs to be installed by RMD would be sited at either existing
CWS facilities or in small utility-type sheds near CWS well heads. Only
minor land disturbances associated with construction activities for
small buildings and utilities, less than 10,000 square feet in width
and less than 5 feet in depth, are expected. The CWS would be required
to obtain all local building permits and meet local requirements to
reduce sedimentation from construction related activities prior to
construction.
The operations of the URS would utilize the same roads that the CWS
currently uses for receiving supplies for typical water treatment
operations (e.g., treatment chemicals, maintenance equipment, and waste
products, etc.). Resin or exchange media loaded with uranium from the
ion exchange vessel will be transported to either an appropriately
authorized disposal facility or a licensed uranium mill for use as
alternate feed material. Material will be transported in either U.S.
Department of Transportation-approved (DOT) tanker trucks or large
polyfabric ``Super Sacks'' that have been approved for transport of
radioactive material. RMD expects 200 trips per year, per 1000
facilities served. Based on accident statistics, and an average
nationwide travel distance of 1000 miles to the site of final
disposition, RMD expects an accident, involving a spent treatment media
shipment, to occur only once every 2.5 years. These accident statistics
do not estimate the severity of the accident and consequences could
range from a severe accident to a minor incident. Even if a small
number of these accidents were to occur, it would not be expected that
they will result in any release. If uranium bearing resins were to be
spilled in a transportation accident, resulting radiation doses to
members of the public were found to be, in general, negligible and in
the range of background variability. RMD will be required to develop
standard operating procedures to respond to and clean up transportation
related spills of radioactive material.
The URS will be housed in a treatment shed or within the existing
CWS. If the URS is housed in a CWS with a floor drain, sump, or similar
water catchment that leads to a sewer or drain field, a secondary
containment system will be required to ensure that radioactive material
cannot be released. The URS will remove uranium from groundwater being
supplied to the public at each CWS served. Such removal of uranium will
reduce human exposure and potential health impacts arising from the
presence of uranium in public drinking water supplies.
If a utility-type shed is required to be constructed to house a
URS, there could be impacts to wildlife or historic structures in the
area. RMD will be required to consult with Federal or State wildlife
agencies and State Historic Preservation Officers before beginning
construction related to, or the use of, a URS that is located outside
of, or away from, existing CWS structures. Noise and visual impacts
from the URS would be similar to what already exists from a CWS. Costs
of the URS system may be passed along to the consumer in the form of
higher water rates. Any rate increases would likely only affect rate
paying consumers and not the general public. Decommissioning of the URS
will be RMD's responsibility and RMD will be required to comply with
NRC's financial assurance criteria.
Public access to the URS will be restricted. The URS will be
required to be housed in a locked shed, structure, or within the CWS
facility and /or be within a fenced in area and properly marked. This
should prevent any exposures to the public from the URS. However, if a
member of the public were to gain entry and come in contact with the
URS, exposure on contact to the ion exchange vessel is expected to be
no greater than 0.3 mrem/hr. Since the URS will likely be inspected on
a daily basis, it is likely that exposures from an unauthorized entry
would be no greater than 7.2 mrem for a 24-hour period, a minor
exposure. If the individual were in the building for that time and
remained 30 cm away from the vessel--a more likely scenario-the
[[Page 59140]]
exposure rate would be 0.003 mrem/hr, which would equate to an exposure
of 0.072 mrem in a 24-hour period, a very minor exposure.
RMD system specialists, the local utility managers and operators
are not expected to receive annual radiation doses anywhere near the
individual monitoring thresholds prescribed in 10 CFR 20.1502,
``Conditions Requiring Individual Monitoring of External and Internal
Occupational Dose.'' These aforementioned thresholds are 500 mrem/yr
for adults or 100 mrem/yr for children or pregnant women. RMD has
estimated maximum dose rates on the sides of the tanks to be between
0.2 to 0.3 mrem/hr and only 0.003 mrem/hr at 30 centimeters. RMD
provided estimates of time operators should spend in the proximity of
the vessels. The tables showed a maximum of 100 hours/year for the
operational personnel. That time would result in an exposure of only 3
mrem for the year. This is a small fraction of the 340 mrem of
background radiation those same individuals receive from natural
sources. To ensure that source material is handled in a proper manner,
uranium-laden (spent) IX resin is not to be stored at the CWS for
greater than 60 days and will only be contained within the IX vessel.
Spent uranium-laden resin will be periodically removed from the URS
and transported to a licensed waste management facility or used as
alternate feed at a licensed uranium recovery facility. Use of either
disposal method will result in a small increase in waste material. If
uranium-laden resin is used as an alternate feed material for uranium
recovery facilities, the uranium removed from drinking water may enter
the nuclear fuel cycle and may ultimately be used for domestic power
generation.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the EA, NRC has concluded that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed licensing action,
and NRC staff has determined not to prepare an environmental impact
statement.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action, including RMD's license
application and supporting documentation, are available electronically
at NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this site, you can access NRC's Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image
files of NRC's public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for the
documents related to this notice are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS Accession No. Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Environmental Assessment for ML062490415 September 5, 2006.
Proposed Performance-Based, Multi-site
License for a Uranium Water Treatment
Program NRC License No. SUB-(TBD)
R.M.D. Operations, LLC.
NUREG-1620, Rev. 1, Standard Review Plan ML032250190 June 30, 2003.
for the Review of a Reclamation Plan
for Mill Tailings Sites Under Title II
of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation
Control Act of 1978--Final Report,
``Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC.
NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review ML031000403 April 10, 2003.
Guidance for Licensing Actions
Associated With NMSS Programs--Final
Report,'' Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC.
R.M.D. Operations, LLC License ML052730008 September 27, 2005.
Application for Performance-Based,
Multi-Site License for Uranium Water
Treatment Program.
R.M.D. Operations, LLC Environmental ML062440255 September 27, 2005.
Report in Support of a Performance-
based, Multi-site License Application
(non-proprietary).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public
computers located at the NRC's PDR, O1 F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of September, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ron C. Linton,
Project Manager, Uranium Processing Section, Fuel Cycle Facilities
Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6-16563 Filed 10-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P