Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries, 58287-58289 [06-8435]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
§ 412.25(e) when instead we were
amending § 412.25(e)(1). Second, we
inadvertently misquoted a portion of
§ 412.25(e)(1). Specifically, we stated
that we were removing the phrase
‘‘paragraph (e)(2) and (e)(4)’’ in the
existing regulations. However, the
existing regulation states ‘‘paragraphs
(e)(2) through (e)(4)’’. Third, we made a
typographical error in describing the
phrase that was replacing the crossreference described above. Specifically,
we stated that ‘‘paragraph (e)(2) and
(e)(5)’’ was replacing ‘‘paragraph (e)(2)
and (e)(4).’’ (We note that our final
regulations make paragraphs (e)(2)
through (e)(5), not just paragraphs (e)(2)
and (e)(5), applicable to satellite
facilities.) Therefore, in section III. B. of
this notice, we are correcting the
aforementioned errors by revising the
first amendatory statement of § 412.25 to
indicate that in paragraph (e)(1) we are
removing the cross-reference to
‘‘paragraphs (e)(2) through (e)(4)’’ and
adding the cross-reference ‘‘paragraphs
(e)(2) through (e)(5)’’ in its place.
On pages 48191, 48201, and 48202, in
Table 5—List of Diagnosis-Related
Groups (DRGS), Relative Weighting
Factors, and Geometric and Arithmetic
Mean Length of Stay (LOS), we
inadvertently listed the incorrect DRG
title for several DRGs and the incorrect
major diagnosis category (MDC) for DRG
566 and DRG 572. Therefore, we are
correcting these errors in section III. C.
of this notice.
III. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 06–6692 of August 18,
2006 (71 FR 47870), make the following
corrections:
A. Corrections to Errors in the Preamble
On page 47944, first column, second
full paragraph, lines 1 and 5, the figure
‘‘583’’ is corrected to read ‘‘577’’.
B. Corrections to Errors in the
Regulations Text
§ 412.25
303
304
305
543
568
Note: The addendum does not appear in
the Code of Federal Regulations.
1. On pages 48191, 48201, and 48202
in Table 5—List of Diagnosis-Related
Groups (DRGS), Relative Weighting
Factors, and Geometric and Arithmetic
Mean Length of Stay (LOS) the
following DRG titles (column 6) are
corrected to read as follows:
[Corrected]
Kidney and Ureter Procedures for Neoplasm.
Kidney and Ureter Procedures for Non-Neoplasm With CC.
Kidney and Ureter Procedures for Non-Neoplasm Without CC.
Craniotomy With Major Device Implant or Acute Complex CNS Principal Diagnosis.
Stomach, Esophageal & Duodenal Proc Age >17 W CC W/O Major GI DX.
2. On page 48202, in Table 5—List of
Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGS),
Relative Weighting Factors, and
Geometric and Arithmetic Mean Length
of Stay (LOS),—
a. Row 9, DRG 566, the MDC (column
4) ‘‘06’’ is corrected to read ‘‘04’’.
b. Row 15, DRG 572, the MDC
(column 4) ‘‘08’’ is corrected to read
‘‘06’’.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delay in Effective Date
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
C. Corrections to Errors in the
Addendum
DRG title
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily
requires a 30-day delay in effective date
of final rules after the date of their
publication in the Federal Register.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
statement for § 412.25, the sentence ‘‘In
paragraph (e) introductory text, remove
the cross-reference ‘paragraph (e)(2) and
(e)(4)’ and add the cross-reference
‘paragraph (e)(2) and (e)(5)’ in its place.’’
is corrected to read, ‘‘In paragraph (e)(1),
remove the cross-reference ‘paragraphs
(e)(2) through (e)(4)’ and add the crossreference ‘paragraphs (e)(2) through
(e)(5)’ in its place.’’
On page 48137, first column, lines 10
through 14, in the first amendatory
DRG
DRG
DRG
DRG
DRG
DRG
58287
14:44 Oct 02, 2006
Jkt 211001
This 30-day delay in effective date can
be waived, however, if an agency finds
for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, and the agency
incorporates a statement of the findings
and its reasons in the rule issued.
Therefore, we are waiving proposed
rulemaking and the 30-day delayed
effective date for the technical
corrections in this notice. This notice
merely corrects typographical and
technical errors in the preamble,
regulations text, and addendum of the
FY 2007 IPPS final rule and does not
make substantive changes to the policies
or payment methodologies that were
adopted in the final rule. As a result,
this notice is intended to ensure that the
FY 2007 IPPS final rule accurately
reflects the policies adopted in the final
rule. Therefore, we find that
undertaking further notice and comment
procedures to incorporate these
corrections into the final rule or
delaying the effective date of these
changes is unnecessary and contrary to
the public interest.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: September 28, 2006.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 06–8429 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[I.D. 092506B]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason
retention limit adjustment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has determined that
the daily Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT)
retention limits for the Atlantic tunas
General category should be adjusted to
allow for a reasonable opportunity to
E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM
03OCR1
58288
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
harvest the General category October
through January time-period subquota.
Therefore, NMFS increases the daily
BFT retention limits for October to
provide enhanced commercial General
category fishing opportunities in all
areas while minimizing the risk of an
overharvest of the General category BFT
quota.
DATES: The effective dates for the BFT
daily retention limits are provided in
Table 1 under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Murray-Brown, 978–281–9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations implemented under the
authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.)
and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.) governing the harvest of BFT by
persons and vessels subject to U.S.
jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR part
635. The 2006 BFT fishing year began
on June 1, 2006, and ends May 31, 2007.
The final initial 2006 BFT specifications
and General category effort controls
were published on May 30, 2006 (71 FR
30619). These final specifications
divided the General category quota
among three subperiods (June through
August, the month of September, and
October through January) in accordance
with the Highly Migratory Species
Fishery Management Plan (1999 FMP)
published in 1999 (May 29, 1999; 64 FR
29090), and implementing regulations at
§ 635.27. A three-fish General category
retention limit was set for the first
subperiod (June through August) due to
the large amount of available quota and
the low catch rate at the opening of the
season. The three-fish General category
retention limit was extended through
the second subperiod (September) as
catch rates remained low to provide
enhanced fishing opportunities while
minimizing the risk of exceeding
available quota (71 FR 51529, August
30, 2006).
Daily Retention Limits
Pursuant to this action and the final
initial 2006 BFT specifications, noted
above, the daily BFT retention limits for
Atlantic tunas General category are as
follows:
TABLE 1. EFFECTIVE DATES FOR RETENTION LIMIT ADJUSTMENTS
Permit Category
Effective Dates
BFT Size Class Limit
September 1, 2006, through September
30, 2006, inclusive
All
Three BFT per vessel per day/trip, measuring 73 inches (185 cm) curved fork
length (CFL) or larger
October 1, 2006, through October 31,
2006, inclusive
All
Three BFT per vessel per day/trip, measuring 73 inches (185 cm) curved fork
length (CFL) or larger
November 1, 2006, through January 31,
2007, inclusive
General
Areas
All
One BFT per vessel per day/trip, measuring 73 inches (185 cm) CFL or larger
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Adjustment of General Category Daily
Retention Limits
Under § 635.23(a)(4), NMFS may
increase or decrease the General
category daily retention limit of large
medium and giant BFT over a range
from zero (on Restricted Fishing Days)
to a maximum of three per vessel to
allow for a reasonable opportunity to
harvest the quota for BFT. As part of the
final specifications on May 30, 2006 (71
FR 30619), NMFS adjusted the
commercial daily BFT retention limit, in
all areas, for those vessels fishing under
the General category quota, to three
large medium or giant BFT, measuring
73 inches (185 cm) or greater curved
fork length (CFL), per vessel per day/
trip. This retention limit was to remain
in effect through August 31, 2006,
inclusive, but on August 30, 2006, was
extended through September (71 FR
51529). From October 1, 2006, through
January 31, 2007, inclusive, the General
category daily BFT retention limit was
scheduled to revert to one large medium
or giant BFT per vessel per day/trip.
The June through September timeperiod subquota allocations for the 2006
fishing year totaled approximately 1,038
metric tons (mt). As of September 15,
2006, 75.8 mt have been landed in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Oct 02, 2006
Jkt 211001
General category and catch rates are less
than 1.0 mt per day. If catch rates
remain at current levels, approximately
11 mt would be landed during the
remainder of September. This projection
would bring the June though September
time-period subquota landings to
approximately 88.4 mt, resulting in an
underharvest of approximately 951 mt.
This carryover combined with the
October through January time-period
subquota allocation of 115.3 mt would
allow for 1,066 mt to be harvested
during the months of October through
January. In combination with the
subquota rollover from the June through
August time-period, the expected
rollover from September time-period
subquota allocation, and the October
through January subquota allocation,
current catch rates, and the daily
retention limit reverting to one large
medium or giant BFT per vessel per day
on October 1, 2006, NMFS anticipates
the full October through January timeperiod subquota will not be harvested.
Adding an excessive amount of unused
quota from one time-period subquota to
the subsequent time period subquota is
undesirable because it effectively
changes the time-period subquota
allocation percentages established in the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1999 FMP and may contribute to
excessive carry-overs to subsequent
fishing years. In the past, however the
fishery has had the capability of
increasing landings rates dramatically in
the latter Fall and Winter months,
particularly off southern states. If the
fishery was to perform at these past
levels with very high landings rates
(although not witnessed during the
winter of 2005/2006) it would alleviate
concern of excessive roll-overs from one
fishing year to the next but raises the
possibility of a curtailed season without
full extension of fishing opportunities
through January.
Therefore, based on a review of dealer
reports, daily landing trends, available
quota, and the availability of BFT on the
fishing grounds, NMFS has determined
that an increase in the General category
daily BFT retention limit effective from
October 1, 2006, through October 31,
2006, inclusive, is warranted. Thus, the
General category daily retention limit of
three large medium or giant BFT per
vessel per day/trip (see Table 1) is
extended through October 31, 2006.
From November 1, 2006, through
January 31, 2007, inclusive, the General
category default daily BFT retention
limit will be one large medium or giant
E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM
03OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
BFT per vessel per day/trip. NMFS
anticipates that with a combination of
the default retention limit starting on
November 1, 2006, and the large amount
of General category quota available,
there will be sufficient quota for the
coastwide General category season to
extend into the winter months and
allow for a southern Atlantic fishery to
take place on an order of magnitude of
prior years with minimal risk of
landings exceeding available quota.
However, to reduce the risks of
excessive landings rates throughout the
winter, NMFS has determined it
necessary to only extend the three BFT
daily retention limit for the one month
of October and will re-examine the need
to further extend the increased bag limit
prior to November 1 based on landings
rates and other fishery information. In
addition, one of the preferred
alternatives in the final Consolidated
Highly Migratory Species FMP (July 14,
2006, 71 FR 40095), would formally
allocate General category sub-quota to
the December and January individual
time-frames to provide for a late-season
south Atlantic fishery.
This adjustment is intended to
provide a reasonable opportunity to
harvest the U.S. landings quota of BFT
while maintaining an equitable
distribution of fishing opportunities, to
help achieve optimum yield in the
General category BFT fishery, to collect
a broad range of data for stock
monitoring purposes, and to be
consistent with the objectives of the
1999 FMP.
Monitoring and Reporting
NMFS selected the daily retention
limits and their duration after
examining current and previous fishing
year catch and effort rates, taking into
consideration public comment on the
annual specifications and inseason
management measures for the General
category received during the 2006 BFT
quota specifications rulemaking process,
and analyzing the available quota for the
2006 fishing year. NMFS will continue
to monitor the BFT fishery closely
through dealer landing reports, the
Automated Landings Reporting System,
state harvest tagging programs in North
Carolina and Maryland, and the Large
Pelagics Survey. Depending on the level
of fishing effort and catch rates of BFT,
NMFS may determine that additional
retention limit adjustments are
necessary to ensure available quota is
not exceeded or, to enhance scientific
data collection from, and fishing
opportunities in, all geographic areas.
Closures or subsequent adjustments to
the daily retention limits, if any, will be
published in the Federal Register. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Oct 02, 2006
Jkt 211001
addition, fishermen may call the
Atlantic Tunas Information Line at (888)
872–8862 or (978) 281–9260, or access
the internet at www.hmspermits.gov, for
updates on quota monitoring and
retention limit adjustments.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
NMFS (AA), finds that it is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to provide prior notice of, and
an opportunity for public comment on,
this action for the following reasons:
NMFS has recently become aware of
increased availability of large medium
and giant BFT off southern New
England fishing grounds from fishing
reports and landings data from dealers.
This increase in abundance provides the
potential to increase General category
landings rates for a late season, southern
New England fishery if participants are
authorized to harvest three large
medium or giant BFT per day. Although
landings to date have been low (i.e. less
than one mt/day) there is the potential
for increased availability of BFT off the
southern New England coast during the
Fall to allow for an increase in fishery
landing rates. The regulations
implementing the 1999 FMP provide for
inseason retention limit adjustments to
respond to the unpredictable nature of
BFT availability on the fishing grounds,
the migratory nature of this species, and
the regional variations in the BFT
fishery. Adjustment of retention limits
is also necessary to avoid excessive
quota rollovers to subsequent General
category time-period subquotas.
Affording prior notice and opportunity
for public comment to implement these
retention limits is impracticable as it
would preclude NMFS from acting
promptly to allow harvest of BFT that
are still available on southern New
England fishing grounds. Analysis of
available data shows that the General
category BFT retention limit may be
increased for the Atlantic tuna General
and HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders with minimal risks of exceeding
the International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
allocated quota.
Delays in increasing the retention
limits would be contrary to the public
interest. Limited opportunities to
harvest the respective quotas may have
negative social and economic impacts to
U.S. fishermen that either depend on
catching the available quota within the
time-periods designated in the 1999
FMP, or depend on multiple BFT
retention limits to attract individuals to
book charters. For both the General and
the HMS Charter/Headboat sectors, the
retention limits must be adjusted as
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58289
expeditiously as possible so the
impacted sectors can benefit from the
adjustment.
Therefore, the AA finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive prior
notice and the opportunity for public
comment. For all of the above reasons,
and because this action relieves a
restriction (i.e., current default retention
limit is one fish per vessel/trip but this
action increases that limit and allows
retention of more fish), there is also
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness.
This action is being taken under 50
CFR 635.23(a)(4) and is exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 1801
et seq.
Dated: September 27, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06–8435 Filed 9–28–06; 2:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 051014263–6028–03; I.D.
092106A]
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Specifications and Management
Measures; Inseason Adjustments
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Inseason adjustments to
groundfish management measures;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces changes to
management measures in the
commercial and recreational Pacific
Coast groundfish fisheries. These
actions, which are authorized by the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), are intended
to allow fisheries to access more
abundant groundfish stocks while
protecting overfished and depleted
stocks.
Effective 0001 hours (local time)
October 1, 2006. Comments on this rule
will be accepted through November 2,
2006.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by I.D. 092106A by any of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM
03OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58287-58289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8435]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[I.D. 092506B]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna
Fisheries
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason retention limit adjustment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has determined that the daily Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT)
retention limits for the Atlantic tunas General category should be
adjusted to allow for a reasonable opportunity to
[[Page 58288]]
harvest the General category October through January time-period
subquota. Therefore, NMFS increases the daily BFT retention limits for
October to provide enhanced commercial General category fishing
opportunities in all areas while minimizing the risk of an overharvest
of the General category BFT quota.
DATES: The effective dates for the BFT daily retention limits are
provided in Table 1 under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Murray-Brown, 978-281-9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations implemented under the authority
of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) and the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) governing the harvest of BFT by
persons and vessels subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR
part 635. The 2006 BFT fishing year began on June 1, 2006, and ends May
31, 2007. The final initial 2006 BFT specifications and General
category effort controls were published on May 30, 2006 (71 FR 30619).
These final specifications divided the General category quota among
three subperiods (June through August, the month of September, and
October through January) in accordance with the Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan (1999 FMP) published in 1999 (May 29,
1999; 64 FR 29090), and implementing regulations at Sec. 635.27. A
three-fish General category retention limit was set for the first
subperiod (June through August) due to the large amount of available
quota and the low catch rate at the opening of the season. The three-
fish General category retention limit was extended through the second
subperiod (September) as catch rates remained low to provide enhanced
fishing opportunities while minimizing the risk of exceeding available
quota (71 FR 51529, August 30, 2006).
Daily Retention Limits
Pursuant to this action and the final initial 2006 BFT
specifications, noted above, the daily BFT retention limits for
Atlantic tunas General category are as follows:
Table 1. Effective dates for retention limit adjustments
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BFT Size Class
Permit Category Effective Dates Areas Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General September 1, 2006, All Three BFT per
through September vessel per day/
30, 2006, trip, measuring 73
inclusive inches (185 cm)
curved fork length
(CFL) or larger
---------------------------------------------------
October 1, 2006, All Three BFT per
through October vessel per day/
31, 2006, trip, measuring 73
inclusive inches (185 cm)
curved fork length
(CFL) or larger
---------------------------------------------------
November 1, 2006, All One BFT per vessel
through January per day/trip,
31, 2007, measuring 73
inclusive inches (185 cm)
CFL or larger
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment of General Category Daily Retention Limits
Under Sec. 635.23(a)(4), NMFS may increase or decrease the General
category daily retention limit of large medium and giant BFT over a
range from zero (on Restricted Fishing Days) to a maximum of three per
vessel to allow for a reasonable opportunity to harvest the quota for
BFT. As part of the final specifications on May 30, 2006 (71 FR 30619),
NMFS adjusted the commercial daily BFT retention limit, in all areas,
for those vessels fishing under the General category quota, to three
large medium or giant BFT, measuring 73 inches (185 cm) or greater
curved fork length (CFL), per vessel per day/trip. This retention limit
was to remain in effect through August 31, 2006, inclusive, but on
August 30, 2006, was extended through September (71 FR 51529). From
October 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007, inclusive, the General
category daily BFT retention limit was scheduled to revert to one large
medium or giant BFT per vessel per day/trip.
The June through September time-period subquota allocations for the
2006 fishing year totaled approximately 1,038 metric tons (mt). As of
September 15, 2006, 75.8 mt have been landed in the General category
and catch rates are less than 1.0 mt per day. If catch rates remain at
current levels, approximately 11 mt would be landed during the
remainder of September. This projection would bring the June though
September time-period subquota landings to approximately 88.4 mt,
resulting in an underharvest of approximately 951 mt. This carryover
combined with the October through January time-period subquota
allocation of 115.3 mt would allow for 1,066 mt to be harvested during
the months of October through January. In combination with the subquota
rollover from the June through August time-period, the expected
rollover from September time-period subquota allocation, and the
October through January subquota allocation, current catch rates, and
the daily retention limit reverting to one large medium or giant BFT
per vessel per day on October 1, 2006, NMFS anticipates the full
October through January time-period subquota will not be harvested.
Adding an excessive amount of unused quota from one time-period
subquota to the subsequent time period subquota is undesirable because
it effectively changes the time-period subquota allocation percentages
established in the 1999 FMP and may contribute to excessive carry-overs
to subsequent fishing years. In the past, however the fishery has had
the capability of increasing landings rates dramatically in the latter
Fall and Winter months, particularly off southern states. If the
fishery was to perform at these past levels with very high landings
rates (although not witnessed during the winter of 2005/2006) it would
alleviate concern of excessive roll-overs from one fishing year to the
next but raises the possibility of a curtailed season without full
extension of fishing opportunities through January.
Therefore, based on a review of dealer reports, daily landing
trends, available quota, and the availability of BFT on the fishing
grounds, NMFS has determined that an increase in the General category
daily BFT retention limit effective from October 1, 2006, through
October 31, 2006, inclusive, is warranted. Thus, the General category
daily retention limit of three large medium or giant BFT per vessel per
day/trip (see Table 1) is extended through October 31, 2006. From
November 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007, inclusive, the General
category default daily BFT retention limit will be one large medium or
giant
[[Page 58289]]
BFT per vessel per day/trip. NMFS anticipates that with a combination
of the default retention limit starting on November 1, 2006, and the
large amount of General category quota available, there will be
sufficient quota for the coastwide General category season to extend
into the winter months and allow for a southern Atlantic fishery to
take place on an order of magnitude of prior years with minimal risk of
landings exceeding available quota. However, to reduce the risks of
excessive landings rates throughout the winter, NMFS has determined it
necessary to only extend the three BFT daily retention limit for the
one month of October and will re-examine the need to further extend the
increased bag limit prior to November 1 based on landings rates and
other fishery information. In addition, one of the preferred
alternatives in the final Consolidated Highly Migratory Species FMP
(July 14, 2006, 71 FR 40095), would formally allocate General category
sub-quota to the December and January individual time-frames to provide
for a late-season south Atlantic fishery.
This adjustment is intended to provide a reasonable opportunity to
harvest the U.S. landings quota of BFT while maintaining an equitable
distribution of fishing opportunities, to help achieve optimum yield in
the General category BFT fishery, to collect a broad range of data for
stock monitoring purposes, and to be consistent with the objectives of
the 1999 FMP.
Monitoring and Reporting
NMFS selected the daily retention limits and their duration after
examining current and previous fishing year catch and effort rates,
taking into consideration public comment on the annual specifications
and inseason management measures for the General category received
during the 2006 BFT quota specifications rulemaking process, and
analyzing the available quota for the 2006 fishing year. NMFS will
continue to monitor the BFT fishery closely through dealer landing
reports, the Automated Landings Reporting System, state harvest tagging
programs in North Carolina and Maryland, and the Large Pelagics Survey.
Depending on the level of fishing effort and catch rates of BFT, NMFS
may determine that additional retention limit adjustments are necessary
to ensure available quota is not exceeded or, to enhance scientific
data collection from, and fishing opportunities in, all geographic
areas.
Closures or subsequent adjustments to the daily retention limits,
if any, will be published in the Federal Register. In addition,
fishermen may call the Atlantic Tunas Information Line at (888) 872-
8862 or (978) 281-9260, or access the internet at www.hmspermits.gov,
for updates on quota monitoring and retention limit adjustments.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for NMFS (AA), finds that it is
impracticable and contrary to the public interest to provide prior
notice of, and an opportunity for public comment on, this action for
the following reasons:
NMFS has recently become aware of increased availability of large
medium and giant BFT off southern New England fishing grounds from
fishing reports and landings data from dealers. This increase in
abundance provides the potential to increase General category landings
rates for a late season, southern New England fishery if participants
are authorized to harvest three large medium or giant BFT per day.
Although landings to date have been low (i.e. less than one mt/day)
there is the potential for increased availability of BFT off the
southern New England coast during the Fall to allow for an increase in
fishery landing rates. The regulations implementing the 1999 FMP
provide for inseason retention limit adjustments to respond to the
unpredictable nature of BFT availability on the fishing grounds, the
migratory nature of this species, and the regional variations in the
BFT fishery. Adjustment of retention limits is also necessary to avoid
excessive quota rollovers to subsequent General category time-period
subquotas. Affording prior notice and opportunity for public comment to
implement these retention limits is impracticable as it would preclude
NMFS from acting promptly to allow harvest of BFT that are still
available on southern New England fishing grounds. Analysis of
available data shows that the General category BFT retention limit may
be increased for the Atlantic tuna General and HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders with minimal risks of exceeding the International
Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas allocated quota.
Delays in increasing the retention limits would be contrary to the
public interest. Limited opportunities to harvest the respective quotas
may have negative social and economic impacts to U.S. fishermen that
either depend on catching the available quota within the time-periods
designated in the 1999 FMP, or depend on multiple BFT retention limits
to attract individuals to book charters. For both the General and the
HMS Charter/Headboat sectors, the retention limits must be adjusted as
expeditiously as possible so the impacted sectors can benefit from the
adjustment.
Therefore, the AA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to
waive prior notice and the opportunity for public comment. For all of
the above reasons, and because this action relieves a restriction
(i.e., current default retention limit is one fish per vessel/trip but
this action increases that limit and allows retention of more fish),
there is also good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) to waive the 30-day
delay in effectiveness.
This action is being taken under 50 CFR 635.23(a)(4) and is exempt
from review under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 27, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-8435 Filed 9-28-06; 2:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S