Methyl Bromide; Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decision for Methyl Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Methyl Bromide's Commodity Uses; Extension of Comment Period, 57505-57506 [E6-16063]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices Years of Operation, Mississippi River, City of Monticello, Wright County, MN, Wait Period Ends: 10/30/2006, Contact: Laura Quinn 301–415–2220 EIS No. 20060392, Draft EIS, FRC, 00, North Baja Pipeline Expansion Project, Docket Nos. CP06–61–000 and CP01–23–000, Construction and Operation a Natural Gas Pipeline System, Land Use Plan Amendment, Right-of-Way Grant, Temporary Use Permits and U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, La Paz County, AZ and Riverside and Imperial Counties, CA, Comment Period Ends: 12/28/2006, Contact: Todd Sedmak 1– 866–209–FERC EIS No. 20060393, Final EIS, COE, 00, Kansas City’s Levees, Missouri and Kansas Flood Damage Reduction Study, Improvements to the Existing Line of Protection, Birmingham, Jackson, Clay Counties, MO and Wyandotte County, KS, Wait Period Ends: 10/30/2006, Contact: Christopher M. White 816–389–3158 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Amended Notices EIS No. 20060131, Draft EIS, AFS, OR, Withdrawn—Kelsey Vegetation Management Project, Moving Resource Conditions Closer to the Goals and Desired Future Condition, Deschutes National Forest Land Resource Management Plan, BendFort Rock Ranger District, Deschutes County, OR, Comment Period Ends: 05/30/2006, Contact: David Frantz 541–383–4721 Revision of FR Notice Published 04/14/ 2006: Officially Withdrawn by the Preparing Agency EIS No. 20060337, Draft Supplement, COE, FL, Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Study, Updated Information on Operational Changes to the Current Water Control Plan, Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie River Estuaries, Lake Okeechobee, FL, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2006, Contact: Yvonne Haberer 904–232–1701 Revision of FR Notice Published 08/18/ 2006: Extend Comment Period from 10/02/2006 to 10/16/2006 EIS No. 20060348, Draft EIS, NPS, MN, Disposition of Bureau of Mines Property, Twin Cities Research Center Main Campus, Implementation, Hennepin County, MN, Comment Period Ends: 10/24/2006, Contact: Kim M. Berns 651–290–3030–x244 Revision of FR Notice Published 08/25/ 2006: Correction to Comment Period from 10/09/2006 to 10/24/2006 VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:43 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 Dated: September 26, 2006. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E6–16055 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0123; FRL–8095–9] Methyl Bromide; Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decision for Methyl Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Methyl Bromide’s Commodity Uses; Extension of Comment Period Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). AGENCY: ACTION: Extension of comment period. SUMMARY: On August 9, 2006, EPA announced the availability of EPA’s Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decision (TRED) for Methyl Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Methyl Bromide’s Commodity Uses, and opened a 60–day public comment period on the document. This document announces the extension of the comment period for an additional 45 days. Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPP–2005–0123 must be received on or before November 24, 2006. DATES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register document of August 9, 2006. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Weiss, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 0001; telephone number: (703) 308– 8293; fax number: (703) 308–8005; email address: weiss.steven@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? The Agency included in the earlier notice a list of those who may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57505 B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember to: i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives. vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? To submit comments, or access the official public docket, please follow the detailed instructions as provided in the ADDRESES Unit of the August 9, 2006 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. II. What Action is EPA taking? This document extends the public comment period established in the E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 57506 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register issued on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45546) (FRL–8083–1). In that document, EPA announced the availability of EPA’s Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decision (TRED) for Methyl Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Methyl Bromide’s Commodity Uses, and opened a public comment period on the document. EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on October 10, 2006 for an additional 45 days. The reason for this extension is so the public can comment on the buffer zone look-up table document that the Agency has placed in the docket. This document contains buffer zone look up tables for treatment and aeration periods that were described in the August 9, 2006 decision document and that are based on information already available in the docket. The Agency believes that providing the buffer zone document and extending the comment period will ensure that stakeholders will have a better understanding of the impacts of the decision document and will be able to provide more informed comments for the Agency to consider. In addition to providing the look-up tables in the docket, the Agency has identified two issues that were included in supporting documents but inadvertently omitted or not clearly articulated in the decision document. The first issue was the omission of rates for several uses in ‘‘Table 2, Summary of Labeling Changes for Methyl Bromide Fumigation.’’ An updated version of the table is included in the docket. The second issue was that the decision document states that all buffer zone distances modeled with PERFUM were based on limiting bystander exposure to 1 part per million (ppm) for an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA). Although not stated in the decision document, exposures of durations lasting more than 8 hours were based on limiting exposures to 0.33 ppm for a 24–hour TWA. The reason for having two different exposure limits is to match the most appropriate toxicity endpoint to the expected duration of exposure. III. What is the Agency’s Authority for Taking this Action? Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended directs that, after submission of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, the Administrator shall determine whether pesticides containing such active ingredient are eligible for reregistration, before calling in product specific data on individual end-use products and either reregistering products or taking other ‘‘appropriate regulatory action.’’ Section 408(q) of the VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:43 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to review tolerances and exemptions for pesticide residues in effect as of August 2, 1996, to determine whether the tolerance or exemption meets the requirements of section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of FFDCA. List of Subjects Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests. Dated: September 25, 2006. Debra Edwards, Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. E6–16063 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPP–2004–0202: FRL–8096–6] Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) RED; Extension of Comment Period Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of August 2, 2006, concerning the availability of the pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) reregistration eligibility decision (RED) and the opening of the 60–day public comment period on the RED. This document is extending the comment period for 30 days, from October 2, 2006 to November 1, 2006. DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPP–2004–0202 must be received on or before November 1, 2006. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions for submitting comments as provided in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the August 2, 2006 FR Notice. In addition, comments may be submitted through the Federal Document Management System Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Jill Bloom, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 0001; telephone number: (703) 308– 8019; e-mail address: bloom.jill@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? The Agency included in the August 2, 2006 notice a list of those who may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember to: i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives. vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? To submit comments, or access the official public docket, please follow the E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57505-57506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123; FRL-8095-9]


Methyl Bromide; Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management 
Decision for Methyl Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision 
for Methyl Bromide's Commodity Uses; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On August 9, 2006, EPA announced the availability of EPA's 
Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decision (TRED) for Methyl 
Bromide, and Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Methyl 
Bromide's Commodity Uses, and opened a 60-day public comment period on 
the document. This document announces the extension of the comment 
period for an additional 45 days.

DATES:  Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2005-0123 must be received on or before November 24, 2006.

ADDRESSES:  Follow the detailed instructions as provided under 
ADDRESSES in the Federal Register document of August 9, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Weiss, Special Review and 
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8293; fax 
number: (703) 308-8005; e-mail address: weiss.steven@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency included in the earlier notice a list of those who may 
be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding 
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the 
person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to 
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.
     iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and 
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
     viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period 
deadline identified.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    To submit comments, or access the official public docket, please 
follow the detailed instructions as provided in the ADDRESES Unit of 
the August 9, 2006 Federal Register document. If you have questions, 
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. What Action is EPA taking?

    This document extends the public comment period established in the

[[Page 57506]]

Federal Register issued on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45546) (FRL-8083-1). 
In that document, EPA announced the availability of EPA's Tolerance 
Reassessment and Risk Management Decision (TRED) for Methyl Bromide, 
and Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Methyl Bromide's 
Commodity Uses, and opened a public comment period on the document. EPA 
is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on October 
10, 2006 for an additional 45 days.
     The reason for this extension is so the public can comment on the 
buffer zone look-up table document that the Agency has placed in the 
docket. This document contains buffer zone look up tables for treatment 
and aeration periods that were described in the August 9, 2006 decision 
document and that are based on information already available in the 
docket. The Agency believes that providing the buffer zone document and 
extending the comment period will ensure that stakeholders will have a 
better understanding of the impacts of the decision document and will 
be able to provide more informed comments for the Agency to consider.
    In addition to providing the look-up tables in the docket, the 
Agency has identified two issues that were included in supporting 
documents but inadvertently omitted or not clearly articulated in the 
decision document. The first issue was the omission of rates for 
several uses in ``Table 2, Summary of Labeling Changes for Methyl 
Bromide Fumigation.'' An updated version of the table is included in 
the docket. The second issue was that the decision document states that 
all buffer zone distances modeled with PERFUM were based on limiting 
bystander exposure to 1 part per million (ppm) for an 8 hour time 
weighted average (TWA). Although not stated in the decision document, 
exposures of durations lasting more than 8 hours were based on limiting 
exposures to 0.33 ppm for a 24-hour TWA. The reason for having two 
different exposure limits is to match the most appropriate toxicity 
endpoint to the expected duration of exposure.

III. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended directs that, after submission 
of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, the Administrator 
shall determine whether pesticides containing such active ingredient 
are eligible for reregistration, before calling in product specific 
data on individual end-use products and either reregistering products 
or taking other ``appropriate regulatory action.'' Section 408(q) of 
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(q), 
requires EPA to review tolerances and exemptions for pesticide residues 
in effect as of August 2, 1996, to determine whether the tolerance or 
exemption meets the requirements of section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of 
FFDCA.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 25, 2006.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6-16063 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.