Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Notice 21 for Significant New Alternatives Policy Program, 56884-56893 [E6-15833]
Download as PDF
56884
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP—Continued
State citation [Chapter 16–20
or 45 CSR]
State
effective
date
Title/subject
EPA
approval
date
Additional explanation/citation at
40 CFR 52.2565
[45 CSR] Series 1—Control and Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides From Non-Electric Generating Units As a Means to Mitigate Transport
of Ozone Precursors
Section 45–1–90 ......................
Section 45–1–100 ....................
*
*
*
§ 52.2522
Requirements for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines .....
Requirements for Emissions of NOX from Cement Manufacturing Kilns.
*
*
*
*
*
[Removed and Reserved]
3. In § 52.2522, paragraph (i) is
removed and reserved.
I
[FR Doc. E6–15981 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118; FRL–8223–9]
RIN 2060–AG12
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Notice 21 for Significant New
Alternatives Policy Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Acceptability.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This Notice of Acceptability
expands the list of acceptable
substitutes for ozone-depleting
substances (ODS) under the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program. The substitutes
are for use in the following sectors:
refrigeration and air conditioning, foam
blowing, cleaning solvents, aerosols,
and sterilants. The determinations
concern new substitutes.
DATES: This notice of acceptability is
effective on September 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118
(continuation of Air Docket A–91–42).
All electronic documents in the docket
are listed in the index at https://
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in
the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically at www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Air Docket (No.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
*
*
A–91–42), EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Sheppard by telephone at
(202) 343–9163, by facsimile at (202)
343–2338, by e-mail at
sheppard.margaret@epa.gov, or by mail
at U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 6205J, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Overnight or
courier deliveries should be sent to the
office location at 1310 L Street, NW., 8th
floor, Washington, DC, 20005.
For more information on the Agency’s
process for administering the SNAP
program or criteria for evaluation of
substitutes, refer to the original SNAP
rulemaking published in the Federal
Register on March 18, 1994 (59 FR
13044). Notices and rulemakings under
the SNAP program, as well as other EPA
publications on protection of
stratospheric ozone, are available at
EPA’s Ozone Depletion World Wide
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/ozone/
including the SNAP portion at https://
www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
B. Foam Blowing
C. Cleaning Solvents
D. Aerosols
E. Sterilants
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
B. Regulatory History
Appendix A—Summary of Acceptable
Decisions
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
This section presents EPA’s most
recent acceptable listing decisions for
substitutes in the following industrial
sectors: Refrigeration and air
conditioning, foam blowing, cleaning
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
5/1/06
5/1/06
Sfmt 4700
New Section.
*
*
solvents, aerosols and sterilants. For
copies of the full list of ODS substitutes
in all industrial sectors, visit EPA’s
Ozone Depletion Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/
index.html.
The Agency has determined that the
Clean Air Act does not authorize EPA to
regulate for global climate change
purposes (Memo to Acting
Administrator, Marianne L. Horinko
from Robert E. Fabricant. 2003. Subject:
EPA’s Authority to Impose Mandatory
Controls to Address Global Climate
Change under the Clean Air Act). The
Agency has not yet concluded how this
determination would affect its
consideration of the global warming
potential of substitutes under the SNAP
program. Regardless, for the substitutes
considered here, the global warming
potential of the alternatives was not a
determinative factor in EPA’s acceptable
subject to use conditions determination.
The sections below discuss each
substitute listing in detail. Appendix A
contains a table summarizing today’s
listing decisions for new substitutes.
The statements in the ‘‘Further
Information’’ column in the table
provide additional information, but are
not legally binding under section 612 of
the Clean Air Act. In addition, the
‘‘further information’’ may not be a
comprehensive list of other legal
obligations you may need to meet when
using the substitute. Although you are
not required to follow recommendations
in the ‘‘further information’’ column of
the table to use a substitute, EPA
strongly encourages you to apply the
information when using these
substitutes. In many instances, the
information simply refers to standard
operating practices in existing industry
and/or building-code standards. Thus,
many of these statements, if adopted,
would not require significant changes to
existing operating practices.
You can find submissions to EPA for
the use of the substitutes listed in this
document and other materials
supporting the decisions in this action
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
in docket EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118 at
https://www.regulations.gov.
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
1. R–421A
EPA’s decision:
R–421A [R–125/134a (58.0/42.0)] is
acceptable for use in new and retrofit
equipment as a substitute for
hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-22 in:
• Chillers (centrifugal, screw,
reciprocating);
• Industrial process refrigeration;
• Industrial process air conditioning;
• Retail food refrigeration;
• Cold storage warehouses;
• Refrigerated transport;
• Commercial ice machines;
• Ice skating rinks;
• Household refrigerators and
freezers;
• Vending machines;
• Water coolers;
• Residential dehumidifiers; and
• Household and light commercial air
conditioning and heat pumps.
R–421A is a blend of 58% by weight
hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)–125
(pentafluoroethane, CAS ID #354–33–6),
and 42% by weight HFC–134a (1,1,1,2teterafluoroethane, CAS ID #811–97–2).
A common trade name for this
refrigerant is Choice R421A. You may
find the submission under Docket item
EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0142 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The
ozone depletion potential (ODP) of
R–421A is zero. The contribution of this
blend to greenhouse gas emissions will
be minimized through the
implementation of the venting
prohibition under section 608(c)(2) of
the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR, part 82,
subpart F). This section and EPA’s
implementing regulations prohibit
venting or release of substitutes for class
I or class II ODSs used in refrigeration
and air conditioning and require proper
handling, such as recycling or recovery,
and disposal of these substances.
HFC–125 and HFC–134a are excluded
from the definition of volatile organic
compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s))
addressing the development of State
implementation plans (SIPs) to attain
and maintain the national ambient air
quality standards.
Flammability information: Neither
component of this blend is flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: HFC–125
and HFC–134a have 8 hour/day, 40
hour/week workplace environmental
exposure limits (WEELs) of 1000 ppm
established by the American Industrial
Hygiene Association (AIHA). EPA
recommends that users follow all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
requirements and recommendations
specified in the Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and the
individual components and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration
and air conditioning industry. EPA also
recommends that users of R–421A
adhere to the AIHA’s WEELs.
Comparison to other refrigerants:
R–421A is not an ozone depleter in
contrast to HCFC–22 which it replaces.
We find that R–421A is acceptable
because it does not pose a greater
overall risk to public health and the
environment in the end uses listed
above.
2. R–421B
EPA’s decision:
R–421B [R–125/134a (85.0/15.0)] is
acceptable for use in new and retrofit
equipment as a substitute for HCFC–22,
R–502, and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-12
in:
• Industrial process refrigeration;
• Retail food refrigeration;
• Cold storage warehouses;
• Refrigerated transport;
• Commercial ice machines;
• Ice skating rinks;
• Household refrigerators and
freezers.
R–421B is a blend of 85.0% by weight
HFC–125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS ID
#354–33–6) and 15.0% by weight HFC–
134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID
#811–97–2). A common trade name for
this refrigerant is Choice R421B. You
may find the submission under Docket
item EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0143 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP
of R–421B is zero. For environmental
information on the components of this
blend see the section on environmental
information above for R–421A.
Flammability information: Neither
component of this blend is flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: See the
section above on toxicity and exposure
data above for R–421A.
Comparison to other refrigerants:
R–421B is not an ozone depleter; thus,
it poses a lower risk for ozone depletion
than the ODSs it replaces. Flammability
and toxicity risks are low, as discussed
above. We find that R–421B is
acceptable because it does not pose a
greater overall risk to public health and
the environment in the end uses listed
above.
3. R–422D
EPA’s decision:
R–422D [R–125/134a/600a (65.1/31.5/
3.4)] is acceptable for use in new and
retrofit equipment as a substitute for
HCFC–22 in:
• Chillers (centrifugal, screw,
reciprocating);
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56885
• Industrial process refrigeration;
• Industrial process air conditioning;
• Retail food refrigeration;
• Cold storage warehouses;
• Refrigerated transport;
• Commercial ice machines;
• Ice skating rinks;
• Household refrigerators and
freezers;
• Vending machines;
• Water coolers;
• Residential dehumidifiers;
• Non-mechanical heat transfer;
• Household and light commercial air
conditioning and heat pumps; and
• Motor vehicle air conditioning
(buses and passenger trains only).
R–422D is a blend of 65.1% by weight
HFC–125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS ID
#354–33–6), 31.5% by weight HFC–134a
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID #811–
97–2), and 3.4% by weight R–600a
(isobutane, 2-methyl propane, CAS ID
#75–28–5). A common trade name for
this refrigerant is ISCEON MO29. You
may find the submission under Docket
item EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0121 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP
of R–422D is zero. For environmental
information on HFC–125 and HFC–
134a, see the section on environmental
information above for R–421A.
The contribution of this blend to
greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation
of the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40
CFR, part 82, subpart F). This section
and EPA’s implementing regulations
prohibit venting or release of substitutes
for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and
require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of
these substances.
Isobutane is a VOC under Clean Air
Act regulations concerning the
development of SIPs to attain and
maintain the national ambient air
quality standards. 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability information: While one
component of the blend, isobutane, is
flammable, the blend as formulated and
under worst-case fractionated
formulation scenarios, is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For
information on the workplace exposure
limits for HFC–125 and HFC–134a, see
the section on toxicity and exposure
data above for R–421A. Isobutane has an
8 hour/day, 40 hour/week threshold
limit value (TLV) established by the
American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) of 1000
ppm. EPA recommends that users
follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the
MSDS for the blend and the individual
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
56886
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
components and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration
and air conditioning industry. EPA also
recommends that users of R–422D
adhere to the AIHA’s WEELs and the
ACGIH’s TLV.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R–
422D is not an ozone depleter in
contrast to HCFC–22 which it replaces.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low,
as discussed above. Thus, we find that
R–422D is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end
uses listed above.
4. Formulation of RS–24 Changed
Refrigerant Solutions Ltd. (formerly
Refrigerant Products Ltd.) has notified
EPA that it is changing the composition
of RS–24. On December 20, 2002 (67 FR
77927), EPA found the original
formulation of RS–24 acceptable for a
variety of end-uses. The composition of
the old formulation was claimed as
confidential business information (CBI).
We will identify the old composition as
‘‘RS–24 (2002 composition)’’ and will
continue to find it acceptable. EPA’s
decision on the new formulation is
discussed below in the decision for R–
426A.
5. R–426A
EPA’s decision:
R–426A [R–125/134a/600/601a (5.1/
93.0/1.3/0.6)] is acceptable for use in
new and retrofit equipment as a
substitute for CFC–12 in:
• Industrial process refrigeration;
• Industrial process air conditioning;
• Retail food refrigeration;
• Cold storage warehouses;
• Refrigerated transport;
• Commercial ice machines;
• Ice skating rinks;
• Vending machines;
• Water coolers;
• Household refrigerators and
freezers; and
• Residential dehumidifiers.
R–426A [R–125/134a/600/601a (5.1/
93.0/1.3/0.6)] is acceptable, subject to
use conditions, for use in new and
retrofit equipment as a substitute for
CFC–12 in the following end use:
• Motor vehicle air conditioning.
Conditions for use in motor vehicle air
conditioning systems. Regulations
regarding recycling and prohibiting
venting issued under section 609 of the
Clean Air Act apply to this blend
(subpart B of 40 CFR part 82).
On October 16, 1996, (61 FR 54029),
EPA promulgated a final rule that
established certain conditions on the
use of any refrigerant used as a
substitute for CFC–12 in motor vehicle
air conditioning systems (Appendix D of
subpart G of 40 CFR part 82). That rule
provided that EPA would list new motor
vehicle air conditioning system
refrigerants in future notices of
acceptability and that these conditions
would apply to any such refrigerant
found acceptable. Therefore, the use of
R–426A as a CFC–12 substitute in motor
vehicle air conditioning systems must
follow the standard conditions:
• The use of unique fittings designed
by the refrigerant manufacturer;
• The application of a detailed label;
• The removal of the original
refrigerant prior to charging with R–
426A; and
• The installation of a high-pressure
compressor cutoff switch on systems
equipped with pressure relief devices.
The October 16, 1996 rule gives full
details on these use conditions.
You must use the following fittings to
use R–426A in motor vehicle air
conditioning systems:
Diameter
(inches)
Fitting type
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Low-side service port .........................................................................................................................
High-side service port .........................................................................................................................
Large containers (>20 lb.) ..................................................................................................................
Small cans ..........................................................................................................................................
The quick-connect fittings have been
reviewed and found to be sufficiently
different from HFC–134a and FRIGC
FR–12 quick-connect fittings to be
considered unique. The labels will have
a gold background and black text. These
are the same quick-connect fittings and
same label as previously approved for
RS–24 (2002 composition); however, the
manufacturer of R–426A has stated that
RS–24 (2002 composition) has not been
and will not be sold for use in motor
vehicle air conditioners.
R–426A is a blend of 5.1% by weight
HFC–125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS ID
#354–33–6), 93.0% by weight HFC–134a
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID #811–
97–2), 1.3% by weight R–600 (n-butane,
CAS ID #106–97–8), and 0.6% by
weight R–601a (isopentane, 2methylbutane, CAS ID #78–78–4). A
common trade name for this refrigerant
is RS–24. This is a new formulation for
RS–24, different from the one that EPA
previously found acceptable in several
refrigerant end uses (December 20, 2002;
67 FR 77927). You may find additional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
information under Docket item EPA–
HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0148 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP
of R–426A is zero. For environmental
information on HFC–125 and HFC–134a
see the section on environmental
information above for R–421A.
The contribution of this blend to
greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation
of the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40
CFR, part 82, subpart F). This section
and EPA’s implementing regulations
prohibit venting or release of substitutes
for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and
require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of
these substances.
Isopentane and n-butane are VOCs
under Clean Air Act regulations
concerning the development of SIPs to
attain and maintain the national
ambient air quality standards. 40 CFR
51.100(s).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Thread pitch
(threads/inch)
Thread
direction
Quick-connect
Quick-connect
Quick-connect
Quick-connect
Flammability information: While two
of the blend components, n-butane and
isopentane, are flammable, the blend as
formulated, and under worst-case
fractionated formulation scenarios, is
not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: HFC–125
and HFC–134a have 8 hour/day, 40
hour/week WEELs of 1000 ppm
established by the AIHA. The other
components, n-butane and isopentane,
have 8 hour/day, 40 hour/week
threshold limit values (TLVs)
established by the American Conference
of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) of 800 ppm and 600 ppm,
respectively. EPA recommends that
users follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the
MSDS for the blend and the individual
components and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration
and air conditioning industry. EPA also
recommends that users of R–426A
adhere to the AIHA’s WEELs and the
ACGIH’s TLV.
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Comparison to other refrigerants: R–
426A is not an ozone depleter in
contrast to CFC–12 which it replaces.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low,
as discussed above. Thus, we find that
R–426A is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end
uses and applications listed above.
6. Formulation of RS–44 Changed
Refrigerant Solutions Ltd. (formerly
Refrigerant Products Ltd.) has notified
EPA that it is changing the composition
of RS–44. On August 21, 2003 (68 FR
50533), EPA found the original
formulation of RS–44 acceptable for a
variety of end-uses. The composition of
the old formulation was claimed as
confidential business information (CBI).
We will continue to identify the blend
as ‘‘RS–44 (2003 composition)’’ and will
continue to find it acceptable. EPA’s
decision on the new formulation is
discussed below in the decision for R–
424A.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
7. R–424A
EPA’s decision:
R–424A [R–125/134a/600a/600/601a]
(50.5/47.0/0.9/1.0/0.6)] is acceptable for
use in new and retrofit equipment as a
substitute for HCFC–22 in:
• Chillers (centrifugal, screw,
reciprocating);
• Industrial process refrigeration;
• Industrial process air conditioning;
• Retail food refrigeration;
• Cold storage warehouses;
• Refrigerated transport;
• Commercial ice machines;
• Ice skating rinks;
• Household refrigerators and
freezers;
• Residential dehumidifiers; and
• Household and light commercial
air conditioning and heat pumps.
R–424A is a blend of 50.5% by weight
HFC–125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS ID #
354–33–6), 47.0% by weight HFC–134a
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID #811–
97–2), 0.9% by weight R–600a
(isobutane, 2-methyl propane, CAS ID
#75–28–5), 1.0% by weight R–600 (nbutane, CAS ID #106–97–8), and 0.6%
by weight R–601a (isopentane, 2methylbutane, CAS ID #78–78–4). A
common trade name for this refrigerant
is RS–44. This is a new formulation for
RS–44, different from the one that EPA
previously found acceptable in several
refrigerant end uses (August 21, 2003;
68 FR 50533). You may find additional
information under Docket item EPA–
HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0131 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP
of R–424A is zero. For environmental
information on HFC–125 and HFC–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
134a, see the section on environmental
information above for R–421A. For
environmental information on R–600
and R–601a, see the section on
environmental information above for R–
426A. For environmental information
on R–600a, see the section on
environmental information above for R–
422D.
The contribution of this blend to
greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation
of the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40
CFR, part 82, subpart F). This section
and EPA’s implementing regulations
prohibit venting or release of substitutes
for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and
require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of
these substances.
Isobutane, n-butane, and isopentane
are VOCs under Clean Air Act
regulations concerning the development
of SIPs to attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards.
40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability information: While
three components of the blend are
flammable, the blend as formulated, and
under worst-case fractionated
formulation scenarios, is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For
information on the workplace exposure
limits for the components of this blend
see the toxicity and exposure data
sections above for R–421A, R–422D, and
R–426A. EPA recommends that users
follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the
MSDS for the blend and the individual
components and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration
and air conditioning industry. EPA also
recommends that users of R–424A
adhere to the AIHA’s WEELs and the
ACGIH’s TLV.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R–
424A is not an ozone depleter in
contrast to HCFC–22 which it replaces.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low,
as discussed above. Thus, we find that
R–424A is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end
uses listed above.
8. R–407D
EPA’s decision:
R–407D [R–32/125/134a (15.0/15.0/
70.0)] is acceptable for use in new and
retrofit equipment as a substitute for
CFC–12 in:
• Refrigerated transport.
R–407D is a blend of 15.0% by weight
HFC–32 (difluoromethane, CAS ID #75–
10–5), 15.0% by weight HFC–125
(pentafluoroethane, CAS ID # 354–33–
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56887
6), and 70.0% by weight HFC–134a
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID #811–
97–2).
Environmental information: The ODP
of R–407D is zero. For environmental
information on HFC–125 and HFC–
134a, see the section on environmental
information above for R–421A.
The contribution of this blend to
greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation
of the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40
CFR, part 82, subpart F). This section
and EPA’s implementing regulations
prohibit venting or release of substitutes
for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and
require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of
these substances. HFC–32 is excluded
from the definition of volatile organic
compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s))
addressing the development of State
implementation plans (SIPs) to attain
and maintain the national ambient air
quality standards.
Flammability information: While one
component of the blend, HFC–32, is
flammable, the blend as formulated and
under worst case fractionated
formulation scenarios is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For
information on the workplace exposure
limits for HFC–125 and HFC–134a, see
the section on toxicity and exposure
data above for R–421A. HFC–32 has an
8 hour/day, 40 hour/week workplace
environmental exposure limits (WEELs)
of 1000 ppm established by the
American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA). EPA recommends
that users follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for
the blend and the individual
components and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration
and air conditioning industry. EPA also
recommends that users of R–407D
adhere to the AIHA’s WEELs.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R–
407D is not an ozone depleter in
contrast to CFC–12 which it replaces.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low,
as discussed above. Thus, we find that
R–407D is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end
uses listed above.
B. Foam Blowing
1. EcomateTM
EPA’s decision:
EcomateTM is acceptable as a
substitute for CFCs and HCFCs in the
following end uses:
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
56888
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
• Polystyrene, Extruded Boardstock &
Billet;
• Phenolic Insulation Board &
Bunstock;
• Flexible Polyurethane;
• Polyurethane, Extruded Sheet; and
• Polyolefin.
EPA previously found Ecomate
acceptable for a number of foam
blowing end uses in Notice 18, August
21, 2003 (68 FR 50533) and Notice 19,
October 1, 2004 (69 FR 58903).
The submitter, Foam Supplies Inc.,
claims that the composition of
EcomateTM is confidential business
information (see docket A–91–42, item
VI–D–296).
Environmental information:
EcomateTM has no ODP. Users should be
aware that EcomateTM is not excluded
from the definition of volatile organic
compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act
regulations addressing the development
of State implementation plans (SIPs) to
attain and maintain the national
ambient air quality standards. 40 CFR
51.100(s). For more information, refer to
the manufacturer of EcomateTM, EPA
regulations, and your state or local air
quality agency. Also, because
EcomateTM is considered hazardous,
spills and disposal should be handled in
accordance with requirements of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA).
Flammability information: EcomateTM
is flammable and should be handled
with proper precautions. Use of
EcomateTM will require safe handling
and shipping as prescribed by the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and the
Department of Transportation (for
example, using personal safety
equipment and following requirements
for shipping hazardous materials at 49
CFR parts 170 through 173). However,
when blended with fire retardant, the
flammability of EcomateTM can be
reduced to make a formulation that is
either combustible or non-flammable
(refer to the manufacturer of EcomateTM
for more information).
Toxicity and exposure data:
EcomateTM should be handled with
proper precautions. EPA anticipates that
EcomateTM will be used consistent with
the recommendations specified in the
manufacturers’ Material Safety Data
Sheets (MSDSs) (e.g., use goggles and
neoprene gloves when handling; handle
in a fume hood or with adequate
ventilation; if the workplace exposure
limit is exceeded, use a NIOSH/MSHA
approved air supplied respirator in the
absence of proper environmental
control). OSHA established a
permissible exposure limit for the main
component of EcomateTM of 100 ppm
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
for a time-weighted average over an
eight-hour work shift. The ACGIH
recommends a TLV of 100 ppm on an
eight-hour time-weighted average and a
short-term exposure limit of 150 ppm
for a 15-minute time-weighted average
for the main component of EcomateTM.
Comparison to other foam blowing
agents: EcomateTM is not an ozone
depleter in contrast to the CFCs and
HCFCs it replaces. Although EcomateTM
is flammable, we find that the
manufacturer’s recommended
precautions for safety are sufficient so
that the risks will not be significantly
higher than for other available or
potentially available substitutes in this
end use. Meeting Federal exposure
requirements allows EcomateTM to be
used with no greater risk of toxicity than
for other available or potentially
available substitutes in this end use.
Thus, we find that EcomateTM is
acceptable because there are no other
substitutes that are currently or
potentially available that provide a
substantially lower risk to public health
and the environment in the end uses
listed above. You may find additional
information under Docket item EPA–
HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0063 at
www.regulations.gov.
C. Cleaning Solvents
1. Mini-Max Cleaner
EPA’s decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner is acceptable
as a substitute for CFC–113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs in the following
end-uses:
• Metal cleaning;
• Electronics cleaning; and
• Precision cleaning.
Mini-Max Cleaner is a cleaning
device that creates super-heated, high
pressure steam vapor. A relatively small
amount of water is used, thus
minimizing the amount of waste water
that is produced. You may find the
submission under Docket item EPA–
HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0120 and –0124
at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: Mini-Max
Cleaner does not create emissions and
its ODP is zero. The relatively small
amount of water used minimizes
indirect impacts on the atmosphere and
on water.
Flammability information: The device
is not flammable. There is a potential
explosion hazard when the Mini-Max
Cleaner is used in the presence of VOCs
or where liquids with a flash point are
added to the water. EPA recommends
that users follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the user
safety manual to minimize any risks.
Toxicity and exposure data: The
Mini-Max Cleaner introduces no
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
chemicals of concern. The resulting
waste should be handled with safety
precautions common in the solvent
cleaning industry because the removed
soils and chemicals may be toxic.
Comparison to other cleaning
solvents: The Mini-Max Cleaner is not
an ozone depleter. Flammability and
toxicity risks are negligible, as discussed
above. Thus, we find that the Mini-Max
Cleaner is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater risk to public health
and the environment in the end uses
listed. For more information refer to the
manufacturer of the Mini-Max Cleaner.
D. Aerosols
1. Mini-Max Cleaner
EPA’s decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner is acceptable
as a substitute for CFC–113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs in aerosol
solvents.
Environmental information: For
further information about the Mini-Max
Cleaner, see above in section B.1 on
solvent cleaning.
Flammability information: For further
information about the Mini-Max
Cleaner, see above in section B.1 on
solvent cleaning.
Toxicity and exposure data: For
further information about the Mini-Max
Cleaner, see above in section B.1 on
solvent cleaning.
Comparison to other aerosol solvents:
The Mini-Max Cleaner is not an ozone
depleter. Flammability and toxicity
risks are negligible, as discussed above.
Thus, we find that the Mini-Max
Cleaner is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater risk to public health
and the environment in the end use
listed.
E. Sterilants
1. Mini-Max Cleaner
EPA’s decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner is acceptable
as a substitute for CFC–12, HCFC–22,
HCFC–124 and blends thereof in the
sterilization sector.
EPA previously found steam
acceptable as a sterilant under 59
FR13044, March 18, 1994. You may find
the submission under Docket items
EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118–0120 and
–0124 at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: For
further information about the Mini-Max
Cleaner, see above in section B.1 on
solvent cleaning.
Flammability information: For further
information about the Mini-Max
Cleaner, see above in section B.1 on
solvent cleaning.
Toxicity and exposure: EPA expects
users to follow all recommendations
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
specified in the user’s manual and other
safety precautions common in the
medical sterilization industry.
Comparison to other sterilants: The
Mini-Max Cleaner is not an ozone
depleter. Flammability risks are
negligible, as discussed above. The
toxicity is less than that of ethylene
oxide and its blends. Thus, we find the
Mini-Max Cleaner acceptable because
it does not pose a greater risk to public
health and the environment.
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 612 of the Clean Air Act
authorizes EPA to develop a program for
evaluating alternatives to ozonedepleting substances. We refer to this
program as the Significant New
Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program.
The major provisions of section 612 are:
• Rulemaking—Section 612(c)
requires EPA to promulgate rules
making it unlawful to replace any class
I (chlorofluorocarbon, halon, carbon
tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, and
hydrobromofluorocarbon) or class II
(hydrochlorofluorocarbon) substance
with any substitute that the
Administrator determines may present
adverse effects to human health or the
environment where the Administrator
has identified an alternative that (1)
reduces the overall risk to human health
and the environment, and (2) is
currently or potentially available.
• Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable
Substitutes—Section 612(c) also
requires EPA to publish a list of the
substitutes unacceptable for specific
uses. We must publish a corresponding
list of acceptable alternatives for
specific uses.
• Petition Process—Section 612(d)
grants the right to any person to petition
EPA to add a substance to or delete a
substance from the lists published in
accordance with section 612(c). The
Agency has 90 days to grant or deny a
petition. Where the Agency grants the
petition, it must publish the revised lists
within an additional six months.
• 90-day Notification—Section 612(e)
directs EPA to require any person who
produces a chemical substitute for a
class I substance to notify the Agency
not less than 90 days before new or
existing chemicals are introduced into
interstate commerce for significant new
uses as substitutes for a class I
substance. The producer must also
provide the Agency with the producer’s
unpublished health and safety studies
on such substitutes.
• Outreach—Section 612(b)(1) states
that the Administrator shall seek to
maximize the use of Federal research
facilities and resources to assist users of
class I and II substances in identifying
and developing alternatives to the use of
such substances in key commercial
applications.
• Clearinghouse—Section 612(b)(4)
requires the Agency to set up a public
clearinghouse of alternative chemicals,
product substitutes, and alternative
manufacturing processes that are
available for products and
manufacturing processes which use
class I and II substances.
B. Regulatory History
On March 18, 1994, EPA published
the final rulemaking (59 FR 13044) that
described the process for administering
the SNAP program and issued our first
acceptability lists for substitutes in the
major industrial use sectors. These
sectors include:
• Refrigeration and air conditioning;
• Foam blowing;
• Solvents cleaning;
• Fire suppression and explosion
protection;
• Sterilants;
• Aerosols;
• Adhesives, coatings and inks; and
• Tobacco expansion.
These sectors comprise the principal
industrial sectors that historically
consumed the largest volumes of ozonedepleting compounds.
As described in this original rule for
the SNAP program, EPA does not
believe that rulemaking procedures are
required to list alternatives as
acceptable with no limitations. Such
listings do not impose any sanction, nor
do they remove any prior license to use
a substance. Therefore, by this notice we
are adding substances to the list of
acceptable alternatives without first
requesting comment on new listings.
However, we do believe that noticeand-comment rulemaking is required to
place any substance on the list of
prohibited substitutes, to list a
substance as acceptable only under
certain conditions, to list substances as
acceptable only for certain uses, or to
remove a substance from the lists of
prohibited or acceptable substitutes. We
publish updates to these lists as separate
notices of rulemaking in the Federal
Register.
The Agency defines a ‘‘substitute’’ as
any chemical, product substitute, or
alternative manufacturing process,
whether existing or new, intended for
use as a replacement for a class I or class
II substance. Anyone who plans to
market or produces a substitute for an
ODS in one of the eight major industrial
use sectors must provide EPA with
health and safety studies on the
substitute at least 90 days before
introducing it into interstate commerce
for significant new use as an alternative.
This requirement applies to substitute
manufacturers, but may include
importers, formulators, or end-users,
when they are responsible for
introducing a substitute into commerce.
You can find a complete chronology
of SNAP decisions and the appropriate
Federal Register citations from the
SNAP section of EPA’s Ozone Depletion
World Wide Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/chron.html.
This information is also available from
the Air Docket (see ADDRESSES section
above for contact information).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE DECISIONS
End-use
Substitute
Decision
Further information
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Centrifugal chillers (retrofit
and new).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56889
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
56890
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE DECISIONS—Continued
End-use
Screw chillers (retrofit and
new).
Reciprocating chillers (retrofit and new).
Industrial process refrigeration (retrofit and new).
Industrial process air conditioning (retrofit and new).
Retail food refrigeration (retrofit and new).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Cold storage warehouses
(retrofit and new).
Refrigerated transport (retrofit and new).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Substitute
Decision
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Further information
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE DECISIONS—Continued
End-use
Commercial ice machines
(retrofit and new).
Ice skating rinks (retrofit and
new).
Household refrigerators and
freezers (retrofit and new).
Vending machines (retrofit
and new).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Water coolers (retrofit and
new).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Substitute
Decision
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–407D as a substitute for
CFC–12.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421B (Choice R421B)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22, R–502, and
CFC–12.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Further information
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
56891
56892
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE DECISIONS—Continued
End-use
Residential dehumidifiers
(retrofit and new).
Non-mechanical heat transfer (retrofit and new).
Household and light commercial air conditioning
and heat pumps (retrofit
and new).
Motor vehicle air conditioning (buses and passenger trains only).
Motor vehicle air conditioning.
Substitute
Decision
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–421A (Choice R421A)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
Acceptable.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–424A (RS–44) as a substitute for HCFC–22.
ISCEON MO29 (R–422D)
as a substitute for
HCFC–22.
R–426A (RS–24) as a substitute for CFC–12.
Further information
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable subject to use
conditions.
Users must use the unique fittings and label specified
by the manufacturer. Use is subject to requirements
under § 609 of the Clean Air Act.
Foam Blowing
Polystyrene, Extruded
Boardstock & Billet.
Ecomate TM as a substitute
for CFCs and HCFCs.
Acceptable.
Phenolic Insulation Board &
Bunstock.
Ecomate TM as a substitute
for CFCs and HCFCs.
Acceptable.
Flexible Polyurethane ..........
Ecomate TM as a substitute
for CFCs and HCFCs.
Acceptable.
Polyurethane, Extruded
Sheet.
Ecomate TM as a substitute
for CFCs and HCFCs.
Acceptable.
Polyolefin .............................
Ecomate TM as a substitute
for CFCs and HCFCs.
OSHA established a permissible exposure limit for the
main component of Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for a
time-weighted average over an eight-hour work
shift.
OSHA established a permissible exposure limit for the
main component of Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for a
time-weighted average over an eight-hour work
shift.
OSHA established a permissible exposure limit for the
main component of Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for a
time-weighted average over an eight-hour work
shift.
OSHA established a permissible exposure limit for the
main component of Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for a
time-weighted average over an eight-hour work
shift.
OSHA established a permissible exposure limit for the
main component of Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for a
time-weighted average over an eight-hour work
shift.
Acceptable.
Cleaning Solvents
Metal cleaning .....................
Electronics cleaning .............
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Precision cleaning ...............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
The Mini-Max Cleaner as
a substitute for CFC–
113, methyl chloroform,
and HCFCs.
The Mini-Max Cleaner as
a substitute for CFC–
113, methyl chloroform,
and HCFCs.
The Mini-Max Cleaner as
a substitute for CFC–
113, methyl chloroform,
and HCFCs.
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable.
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
56893
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE DECISIONS—Continued
End-use
Substitute
Decision
Further information
Aerosols
Aerosol solvents ..................
Cleaner
The Mini-Max
as
a substitute for CFC–
113, methyl chloroform,
and HCFCs.
Acceptable.
Sterilants
Sterilants ..............................
The Mini-Max Cleaner as
a substitute for CFC–12,
HCFC–22, HCFC–124,
and blends thereof.
[FR Doc. E6–15833 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Accordingly, 47 CFR part 64 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
I
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 02–278 and 05–338; FCC
06–42]
Rules and Regulations Implementing
the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991; Junk Fax Prevention Act
of 2005
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
This document contains
corrections to the final regulations
which were published in the Federal
Register of Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 71
FR 25967. The regulations relate to the
sending of unsolicited facsimile
advertisements as required by the Junk
Fax Prevention Act of 2005 (the Junk
Fax Prevention Act).
DATES: Effective on August 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erica McMahon or Richard Smith,
Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau, (202) 418–2512.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Background
The Federal Communications
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register on May 3, 2006, 71
FR 25967 amending part 64 of its rules
on unsolicited facsimile advertisements
as required by the Junk Fax Prevention
Act.
Need for Correction
As published, the final regulations
contain errors and omissions.
17:21 Sep 27, 2006
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Communications common carriers,
Telecommunications, Telephone.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Acceptable.
Jkt 208001
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 254(k) secs.
403(b)(2)(B) ,(c), Pub. L. 104–104, 110 Stat.
56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 222,
225, 226, 228, and 254(k) unless otherwise
noted.
2. Revise paragraphs (a)(3)(iii)(B) and
(C) and add paragraphs (a)(4) through
(a)(7) to read as follows:
I
§ 64.1200
Delivery restrictions.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) The notice states that the recipient
may make a request to the sender of the
advertisement not to send any future
advertisements to a telephone facsimile
machine or machines and that failure to
comply, within 30 days, with such a
request meeting the requirements under
paragraph (a)(3)(v) of this section is
unlawful;
(C) The notice sets forth the
requirements for an opt-out request
under paragraph (a)(3)(v) of this section;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Use an automatic telephone
dialing system in such a way that two
or more telephone lines of a multi-line
business are engaged simultaneously.
(5) Disconnect an unanswered
telemarketing call prior to at least 15
seconds or four (4) rings.
(6) Abandon more than three percent
of all telemarketing calls that are
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
answered live by a person, or measured
over a 30-day period. A call is
‘‘abandoned’’ if it is not connected to a
live sales representative within two (2)
seconds of the called person’s
completed greeting. Whenever a sales
representative is not available to speak
with the person answering the call, that
person must receive, within two (2)
seconds after the called person’s
completed greeting, a prerecorded
identification message that states only
the name and telephone number of the
business, entity, or individual on whose
behalf the call was placed, and that the
call was for ‘‘telemarketing purposes.’’
The telephone number so provided
must permit any individual to make a
do-not-call request during regular
business hours for the duration of the
telemarketing campaign. The telephone
number may not be a 900 number or any
other number for which charges exceed
local or long distance transmission
charges. The seller or telemarketer must
maintain records establishing
compliance with paragraph (a)(6) of this
section.
(i) A call for telemarketing purposes
that delivers an artificial or prerecorded
voice message to a residential telephone
line that is assigned to a person who
either has granted prior express consent
for the call to be made or has an
established business relationship with
the caller shall not be considered an
abandoned call if the message begins
within two (2) seconds of the called
person’s completed greeting.
(ii) Calls made by or on behalf of taxexempt nonprofit organizations are not
covered by paragraph (a)(6) of this
section.
(7) Use any technology to dial any
telephone number for the purpose of
determining whether the line is a
facsimile or voice line.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–8245 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM
28SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56884-56893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15833]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118; FRL-8223-9]
RIN 2060-AG12
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Notice 21 for Significant New
Alternatives Policy Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Acceptability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice of Acceptability expands the list of acceptable
substitutes for ozone-depleting substances (ODS) under the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program. The substitutes are for use in the following
sectors: refrigeration and air conditioning, foam blowing, cleaning
solvents, aerosols, and sterilants. The determinations concern new
substitutes.
DATES: This notice of acceptability is effective on September 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 (continuation of Air Docket A-91-42). All
electronic documents in the docket are listed in the index at https://
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Air Docket (No. A-91-
42), EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone
number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sheppard by telephone at
(202) 343-9163, by facsimile at (202) 343-2338, by e-mail at
sheppard.margaret@epa.gov, or by mail at U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Overnight or courier deliveries should be sent to the office
location at 1310 L Street, NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC, 20005.
For more information on the Agency's process for administering the
SNAP program or criteria for evaluation of substitutes, refer to the
original SNAP rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March 18,
1994 (59 FR 13044). Notices and rulemakings under the SNAP program, as
well as other EPA publications on protection of stratospheric ozone,
are available at EPA's Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/ozone/ including the SNAP portion at https://www.epa.gov/
ozone/snap/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
B. Foam Blowing
C. Cleaning Solvents
D. Aerosols
E. Sterilants
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
B. Regulatory History
Appendix A--Summary of Acceptable Decisions
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
This section presents EPA's most recent acceptable listing
decisions for substitutes in the following industrial sectors:
Refrigeration and air conditioning, foam blowing, cleaning solvents,
aerosols and sterilants. For copies of the full list of ODS substitutes
in all industrial sectors, visit EPA's Ozone Depletion Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/.
The Agency has determined that the Clean Air Act does not authorize
EPA to regulate for global climate change purposes (Memo to Acting
Administrator, Marianne L. Horinko from Robert E. Fabricant. 2003.
Subject: EPA's Authority to Impose Mandatory Controls to Address Global
Climate Change under the Clean Air Act). The Agency has not yet
concluded how this determination would affect its consideration of the
global warming potential of substitutes under the SNAP program.
Regardless, for the substitutes considered here, the global warming
potential of the alternatives was not a determinative factor in EPA's
acceptable subject to use conditions determination.
The sections below discuss each substitute listing in detail.
Appendix A contains a table summarizing today's listing decisions for
new substitutes. The statements in the ``Further Information'' column
in the table provide additional information, but are not legally
binding under section 612 of the Clean Air Act. In addition, the
``further information'' may not be a comprehensive list of other legal
obligations you may need to meet when using the substitute. Although
you are not required to follow recommendations in the ``further
information'' column of the table to use a substitute, EPA strongly
encourages you to apply the information when using these substitutes.
In many instances, the information simply refers to standard operating
practices in existing industry and/or building-code standards. Thus,
many of these statements, if adopted, would not require significant
changes to existing operating practices.
You can find submissions to EPA for the use of the substitutes
listed in this document and other materials supporting the decisions in
this action
[[Page 56885]]
in docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 at https://www.regulations.gov.
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
1. R-421A
EPA's decision:
R-421A [R-125/134a (58.0/42.0)] is acceptable for use in new and
retrofit equipment as a substitute for hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-
22 in:
Chillers (centrifugal, screw, reciprocating);
Industrial process refrigeration;
Industrial process air conditioning;
Retail food refrigeration;
Cold storage warehouses;
Refrigerated transport;
Commercial ice machines;
Ice skating rinks;
Household refrigerators and freezers;
Vending machines;
Water coolers;
Residential dehumidifiers; and
Household and light commercial air conditioning and heat
pumps.
R-421A is a blend of 58% by weight hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)-125
(pentafluoroethane, CAS ID 354-33-6), and 42% by weight HFC-
134a (1,1,1,2-teterafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2). A common
trade name for this refrigerant is Choice R421A. You may find the
submission under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0142 at
www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of
R-421A is zero. The contribution of this blend to greenhouse gas
emissions will be minimized through the implementation of the venting
prohibition under section 608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR,
part 82, subpart F). This section and EPA's implementing regulations
prohibit venting or release of substitutes for class I or class II ODSs
used in refrigeration and air conditioning and require proper handling,
such as recycling or recovery, and disposal of these substances.
HFC-125 and HFC-134a are excluded from the definition of volatile
organic compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act regulations (see 40 CFR
51.100(s)) addressing the development of State implementation plans
(SIPs) to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality
standards.
Flammability information: Neither component of this blend is
flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: HFC-125 and HFC-134a have 8 hour/day,
40 hour/week workplace environmental exposure limits (WEELs) of 1000
ppm established by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA).
EPA recommends that users follow all requirements and recommendations
specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and
the individual components and other safety precautions common in the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry. EPA also recommends that
users of R-421A adhere to the AIHA's WEELs.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-421A is not an ozone depleter
in contrast to HCFC-22 which it replaces. We find that R-421A is
acceptable because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed above.
2. R-421B
EPA's decision:
R-421B [R-125/134a (85.0/15.0)] is acceptable for use in new and
retrofit equipment as a substitute for HCFC-22, R-502, and
chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-12 in:
Industrial process refrigeration;
Retail food refrigeration;
Cold storage warehouses;
Refrigerated transport;
Commercial ice machines;
Ice skating rinks;
Household refrigerators and freezers.
R-421B is a blend of 85.0% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane,
CAS ID 354-33-6) and 15.0% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2). A common trade name for
this refrigerant is Choice R421B. You may find the submission under
Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0143 at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP of R-421B is zero. For
environmental information on the components of this blend see the
section on environmental information above for R-421A.
Flammability information: Neither component of this blend is
flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: See the section above on toxicity and
exposure data above for R-421A.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-421B is not an ozone depleter;
thus, it poses a lower risk for ozone depletion than the ODSs it
replaces. Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed above.
We find that R-421B is acceptable because it does not pose a greater
overall risk to public health and the environment in the end uses
listed above.
3. R-422D
EPA's decision:
R-422D [R-125/134a/600a (65.1/31.5/3.4)] is acceptable for use in
new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for HCFC-22 in:
Chillers (centrifugal, screw, reciprocating);
Industrial process refrigeration;
Industrial process air conditioning;
Retail food refrigeration;
Cold storage warehouses;
Refrigerated transport;
Commercial ice machines;
Ice skating rinks;
Household refrigerators and freezers;
Vending machines;
Water coolers;
Residential dehumidifiers;
Non-mechanical heat transfer;
Household and light commercial air conditioning and heat
pumps; and
Motor vehicle air conditioning (buses and passenger trains
only).
R-422D is a blend of 65.1% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane,
CAS ID 354-33-6), 31.5% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2), and 3.4% by weight R-600a
(isobutane, 2-methyl propane, CAS ID 75-28-5). A common trade
name for this refrigerant is ISCEON MO29. You may find the submission
under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0121 at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP of R-422D is zero. For
environmental information on HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see the section on
environmental information above for R-421A.
The contribution of this blend to greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation of the venting prohibition under
section 608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR, part 82, subpart
F). This section and EPA's implementing regulations prohibit venting or
release of substitutes for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of these substances.
Isobutane is a VOC under Clean Air Act regulations concerning the
development of SIPs to attain and maintain the national ambient air
quality standards. 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability information: While one component of the blend,
isobutane, is flammable, the blend as formulated and under worst-case
fractionated formulation scenarios, is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For information on the workplace
exposure limits for HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see the section on toxicity
and exposure data above for R-421A. Isobutane has an 8 hour/day, 40
hour/week threshold limit value (TLV) established by the American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) of 1000 ppm.
EPA recommends that users follow all requirements and recommendations
specified in the MSDS for the blend and the individual
[[Page 56886]]
components and other safety precautions common in the refrigeration and
air conditioning industry. EPA also recommends that users of R-422D
adhere to the AIHA's WEELs and the ACGIH's TLV.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-422D is not an ozone depleter
in contrast to HCFC-22 which it replaces. Flammability and toxicity
risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find that R-422D is
acceptable because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed above.
4. Formulation of RS-24 Changed
Refrigerant Solutions Ltd. (formerly Refrigerant Products Ltd.) has
notified EPA that it is changing the composition of RS-24. On December
20, 2002 (67 FR 77927), EPA found the original formulation of RS-24
acceptable for a variety of end-uses. The composition of the old
formulation was claimed as confidential business information (CBI). We
will identify the old composition as ``RS-24 (2002 composition)'' and
will continue to find it acceptable. EPA's decision on the new
formulation is discussed below in the decision for R-426A.
5. R-426A
EPA's decision:
R-426A [R-125/134a/600/601a (5.1/93.0/1.3/0.6)] is acceptable for
use in new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for CFC-12 in:
Industrial process refrigeration;
Industrial process air conditioning;
Retail food refrigeration;
Cold storage warehouses;
Refrigerated transport;
Commercial ice machines;
Ice skating rinks;
Vending machines;
Water coolers;
Household refrigerators and freezers; and
Residential dehumidifiers.
R-426A [R-125/134a/600/601a (5.1/93.0/1.3/0.6)] is acceptable,
subject to use conditions, for use in new and retrofit equipment as a
substitute for CFC-12 in the following end use:
Motor vehicle air conditioning.
Conditions for use in motor vehicle air conditioning systems.
Regulations regarding recycling and prohibiting venting issued under
section 609 of the Clean Air Act apply to this blend (subpart B of 40
CFR part 82).
On October 16, 1996, (61 FR 54029), EPA promulgated a final rule
that established certain conditions on the use of any refrigerant used
as a substitute for CFC-12 in motor vehicle air conditioning systems
(Appendix D of subpart G of 40 CFR part 82). That rule provided that
EPA would list new motor vehicle air conditioning system refrigerants
in future notices of acceptability and that these conditions would
apply to any such refrigerant found acceptable. Therefore, the use of
R-426A as a CFC-12 substitute in motor vehicle air conditioning systems
must follow the standard conditions:
The use of unique fittings designed by the refrigerant
manufacturer;
The application of a detailed label;
The removal of the original refrigerant prior to charging
with R-426A; and
The installation of a high-pressure compressor cutoff
switch on systems equipped with pressure relief devices.
The October 16, 1996 rule gives full details on these use
conditions.
You must use the following fittings to use R-426A in motor vehicle
air conditioning systems:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diameter Thread
Fitting type (inches) Thread pitch (threads/inch) direction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-side service port.......................... Quick-connect
High-side service port......................... Quick-connect
Large containers (>20 lb.)..................... Quick-connect
Small cans..................................... Quick-connect
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The quick-connect fittings have been reviewed and found to be
sufficiently different from HFC-134a and FRIGC FR-12 quick-connect
fittings to be considered unique. The labels will have a gold
background and black text. These are the same quick-connect fittings
and same label as previously approved for RS-24 (2002 composition);
however, the manufacturer of R-426A has stated that RS-24 (2002
composition) has not been and will not be sold for use in motor vehicle
air conditioners.
R-426A is a blend of 5.1% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS
ID 354-33-6), 93.0% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2), 1.3% by weight R-600 (n-
butane, CAS ID 106-97-8), and 0.6% by weight R-601a
(isopentane, 2-methylbutane, CAS ID 78-78-4). A common trade
name for this refrigerant is RS-24. This is a new formulation for RS-
24, different from the one that EPA previously found acceptable in
several refrigerant end uses (December 20, 2002; 67 FR 77927). You may
find additional information under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0148
at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP of R-426A is zero. For
environmental information on HFC-125 and HFC-134a see the section on
environmental information above for R-421A.
The contribution of this blend to greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation of the venting prohibition under
section 608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR, part 82, subpart
F). This section and EPA's implementing regulations prohibit venting or
release of substitutes for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of these substances.
Isopentane and n-butane are VOCs under Clean Air Act regulations
concerning the development of SIPs to attain and maintain the national
ambient air quality standards. 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability information: While two of the blend components, n-
butane and isopentane, are flammable, the blend as formulated, and
under worst-case fractionated formulation scenarios, is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: HFC-125 and HFC-134a have 8 hour/day,
40 hour/week WEELs of 1000 ppm established by the AIHA. The other
components, n-butane and isopentane, have 8 hour/day, 40 hour/week
threshold limit values (TLVs) established by the American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) of 800 ppm and 600 ppm,
respectively. EPA recommends that users follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the MSDS for the blend and the individual
components and other safety precautions common in the refrigeration and
air conditioning industry. EPA also recommends that users of R-426A
adhere to the AIHA's WEELs and the ACGIH's TLV.
[[Page 56887]]
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-426A is not an ozone depleter
in contrast to CFC-12 which it replaces. Flammability and toxicity
risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find that R-426A is
acceptable because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses and applications listed
above.
6. Formulation of RS-44 Changed
Refrigerant Solutions Ltd. (formerly Refrigerant Products Ltd.) has
notified EPA that it is changing the composition of RS-44. On August
21, 2003 (68 FR 50533), EPA found the original formulation of RS-44
acceptable for a variety of end-uses. The composition of the old
formulation was claimed as confidential business information (CBI). We
will continue to identify the blend as ``RS-44 (2003 composition)'' and
will continue to find it acceptable. EPA's decision on the new
formulation is discussed below in the decision for R-424A.
7. R-424A
EPA's decision:
R-424A [R-125/134a/600a/600/601a] (50.5/47.0/0.9/1.0/0.6)] is
acceptable for use in new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for
HCFC-22 in:
Chillers (centrifugal, screw, reciprocating);
Industrial process refrigeration;
Industrial process air conditioning;
Retail food refrigeration;
Cold storage warehouses;
Refrigerated transport;
Commercial ice machines;
Ice skating rinks;
Household refrigerators and freezers;
Residential dehumidifiers; and
Household and light commercial air conditioning and heat
pumps.
R-424A is a blend of 50.5% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane,
CAS ID 354-33-6), 47.0% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2), 0.9% by weight R-600a
(isobutane, 2-methyl propane, CAS ID 75-28-5), 1.0% by weight
R-600 (n-butane, CAS ID 106-97-8), and 0.6% by weight R-601a
(isopentane, 2-methylbutane, CAS ID 78-78-4). A common trade
name for this refrigerant is RS-44. This is a new formulation for RS-
44, different from the one that EPA previously found acceptable in
several refrigerant end uses (August 21, 2003; 68 FR 50533). You may
find additional information under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0131
at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: The ODP of R-424A is zero. For
environmental information on HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see the section on
environmental information above for R-421A. For environmental
information on R-600 and R-601a, see the section on environmental
information above for R-426A. For environmental information on R-600a,
see the section on environmental information above for R-422D.
The contribution of this blend to greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation of the venting prohibition under
section 608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR, part 82, subpart
F). This section and EPA's implementing regulations prohibit venting or
release of substitutes for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of these substances.
Isobutane, n-butane, and isopentane are VOCs under Clean Air Act
regulations concerning the development of SIPs to attain and maintain
the national ambient air quality standards. 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability information: While three components of the blend are
flammable, the blend as formulated, and under worst-case fractionated
formulation scenarios, is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For information on the workplace
exposure limits for the components of this blend see the toxicity and
exposure data sections above for R-421A, R-422D, and R-426A. EPA
recommends that users follow all requirements and recommendations
specified in the MSDS for the blend and the individual components and
other safety precautions common in the refrigeration and air
conditioning industry. EPA also recommends that users of R-424A adhere
to the AIHA's WEELs and the ACGIH's TLV.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-424A is not an ozone depleter
in contrast to HCFC-22 which it replaces. Flammability and toxicity
risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find that R-424A is
acceptable because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed above.
8. R-407D
EPA's decision:
R-407D [R-32/125/134a (15.0/15.0/70.0)] is acceptable for use in
new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for CFC-12 in:
Refrigerated transport.
R-407D is a blend of 15.0% by weight HFC-32 (difluoromethane, CAS
ID 75-10-5), 15.0% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane, CAS
ID 354-33-6), and 70.0% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane, CAS ID 811-97-2).
Environmental information: The ODP of R-407D is zero. For
environmental information on HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see the section on
environmental information above for R-421A.
The contribution of this blend to greenhouse gas emissions will be
minimized through the implementation of the venting prohibition under
section 608(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (see 40 CFR, part 82, subpart
F). This section and EPA's implementing regulations prohibit venting or
release of substitutes for class I or class II ODSs used in
refrigeration and air conditioning and require proper handling, such as
recycling or recovery, and disposal of these substances. HFC-32 is
excluded from the definition of volatile organic compound (VOC) under
Clean Air Act regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the
development of State implementation plans (SIPs) to attain and maintain
the national ambient air quality standards.
Flammability information: While one component of the blend, HFC-32,
is flammable, the blend as formulated and under worst case fractionated
formulation scenarios is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: For information on the workplace
exposure limits for HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see the section on toxicity
and exposure data above for R-421A. HFC-32 has an 8 hour/day, 40 hour/
week workplace environmental exposure limits (WEELs) of 1000 ppm
established by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). EPA
recommends that users follow all requirements and recommendations
specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and
the individual components and other safety precautions common in the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry. EPA also recommends that
users of R-407D adhere to the AIHA's WEELs.
Comparison to other refrigerants: R-407D is not an ozone depleter
in contrast to CFC-12 which it replaces. Flammability and toxicity
risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find that R-407D is
acceptable because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed above.
B. Foam Blowing
1. EcomateTM
EPA's decision:
EcomateTM is acceptable as a substitute for CFCs and
HCFCs in the following end uses:
[[Page 56888]]
Polystyrene, Extruded Boardstock & Billet;
Phenolic Insulation Board & Bunstock;
Flexible Polyurethane;
Polyurethane, Extruded Sheet; and
Polyolefin.
EPA previously found Ecomate acceptable for a number of foam
blowing end uses in Notice 18, August 21, 2003 (68 FR 50533) and Notice
19, October 1, 2004 (69 FR 58903).
The submitter, Foam Supplies Inc., claims that the composition of
EcomateTM is confidential business information (see docket
A-91-42, item VI-D-296).
Environmental information: EcomateTM has no ODP. Users
should be aware that EcomateTM is not excluded from the
definition of volatile organic compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act
regulations addressing the development of State implementation plans
(SIPs) to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality
standards. 40 CFR 51.100(s). For more information, refer to the
manufacturer of EcomateTM, EPA regulations, and your state
or local air quality agency. Also, because EcomateTM is
considered hazardous, spills and disposal should be handled in
accordance with requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA).
Flammability information: EcomateTM is flammable and
should be handled with proper precautions. Use of EcomateTM
will require safe handling and shipping as prescribed by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Department
of Transportation (for example, using personal safety equipment and
following requirements for shipping hazardous materials at 49 CFR parts
170 through 173). However, when blended with fire retardant, the
flammability of EcomateTM can be reduced to make a
formulation that is either combustible or non-flammable (refer to the
manufacturer of EcomateTM for more information).
Toxicity and exposure data: EcomateTM should be handled
with proper precautions. EPA anticipates that EcomateTM will
be used consistent with the recommendations specified in the
manufacturers' Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) (e.g., use goggles
and neoprene gloves when handling; handle in a fume hood or with
adequate ventilation; if the workplace exposure limit is exceeded, use
a NIOSH/MSHA approved air supplied respirator in the absence of proper
environmental control). OSHA established a permissible exposure limit
for the main component of EcomateTM of 100 ppm for a time-
weighted average over an eight-hour work shift. The ACGIH recommends a
TLV of 100 ppm on an eight-hour time-weighted average and a short-term
exposure limit of 150 ppm for a 15-minute time-weighted average for the
main component of EcomateTM.
Comparison to other foam blowing agents: EcomateTM is
not an ozone depleter in contrast to the CFCs and HCFCs it replaces.
Although EcomateTM is flammable, we find that the
manufacturer's recommended precautions for safety are sufficient so
that the risks will not be significantly higher than for other
available or potentially available substitutes in this end use. Meeting
Federal exposure requirements allows EcomateTM to be used
with no greater risk of toxicity than for other available or
potentially available substitutes in this end use. Thus, we find that
EcomateTM is acceptable because there are no other
substitutes that are currently or potentially available that provide a
substantially lower risk to public health and the environment in the
end uses listed above. You may find additional information under Docket
item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0063 at www.regulations.gov.
C. Cleaning Solvents
1. Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg]
EPA's decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] is acceptable as a substitute for CFC-
113, methyl chloroform, and HCFCs in the following end-uses:
Metal cleaning;
Electronics cleaning; and
Precision cleaning.
Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] is a cleaning device that creates super-
heated, high pressure steam vapor. A relatively small amount of water
is used, thus minimizing the amount of waste water that is produced.
You may find the submission under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0120
and -0124 at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: Mini-Max Cleaner[reg] does not create
emissions and its ODP is zero. The relatively small amount of water
used minimizes indirect impacts on the atmosphere and on water.
Flammability information: The device is not flammable. There is a
potential explosion hazard when the Mini-Max[reg] Cleaner is used in
the presence of VOCs or where liquids with a flash point are added to
the water. EPA recommends that users follow all requirements and
recommendations specified in the user safety manual to minimize any
risks.
Toxicity and exposure data: The Mini-Max Cleaner[reg] introduces no
chemicals of concern. The resulting waste should be handled with safety
precautions common in the solvent cleaning industry because the removed
soils and chemicals may be toxic.
Comparison to other cleaning solvents: The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg]
is not an ozone depleter. Flammability and toxicity risks are
negligible, as discussed above. Thus, we find that the Mini-Max
Cleaner[supreg] is acceptable because it does not pose a greater risk
to public health and the environment in the end uses listed. For more
information refer to the manufacturer of the Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg].
D. Aerosols
1. Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg]
EPA's decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] is acceptable as a substitute for CFC-
113, methyl chloroform, and HCFCs in aerosol solvents.
Environmental information: For further information about the Mini-
Max Cleaner[supreg], see above in section B.1 on solvent cleaning.
Flammability information: For further information about the Mini-
Max Cleaner[supreg], see above in section B.1 on solvent cleaning.
Toxicity and exposure data: For further information about the Mini-
Max Cleaner[supreg], see above in section B.1 on solvent cleaning.
Comparison to other aerosol solvents: The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg]
is not an ozone depleter. Flammability and toxicity risks are
negligible, as discussed above. Thus, we find that the Mini-Max
Cleaner[supreg] is acceptable because it does not pose a greater risk
to public health and the environment in the end use listed.
E. Sterilants
1. Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg]
EPA's decision:
The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] is acceptable as a substitute for CFC-
12, HCFC-22, HCFC-124 and blends thereof in the sterilization sector.
EPA previously found steam acceptable as a sterilant under 59
FR13044, March 18, 1994. You may find the submission under Docket items
EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0120 and -0124 at www.regulations.gov.
Environmental information: For further information about the Mini-
Max Cleaner[supreg], see above in section B.1 on solvent cleaning.
Flammability information: For further information about the Mini-
Max Cleaner[supreg], see above in section B.1 on solvent cleaning.
Toxicity and exposure: EPA expects users to follow all
recommendations
[[Page 56889]]
specified in the user's manual and other safety precautions common in
the medical sterilization industry.
Comparison to other sterilants: The Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] is not
an ozone depleter. Flammability risks are negligible, as discussed
above. The toxicity is less than that of ethylene oxide and its blends.
Thus, we find the Mini-Max Cleaner[supreg] acceptable because it does
not pose a greater risk to public health and the environment.
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 612 of the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to develop a
program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. We
refer to this program as the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)
program. The major provisions of section 612 are:
Rulemaking--Section 612(c) requires EPA to promulgate
rules making it unlawful to replace any class I (chlorofluorocarbon,
halon, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, and
hydrobromofluorocarbon) or class II (hydrochlorofluorocarbon) substance
with any substitute that the Administrator determines may present
adverse effects to human health or the environment where the
Administrator has identified an alternative that (1) reduces the
overall risk to human health and the environment, and (2) is currently
or potentially available.
Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable Substitutes--Section
612(c) also requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes
unacceptable for specific uses. We must publish a corresponding list of
acceptable alternatives for specific uses.
Petition Process--Section 612(d) grants the right to any
person to petition EPA to add a substance to or delete a substance from
the lists published in accordance with section 612(c). The Agency has
90 days to grant or deny a petition. Where the Agency grants the
petition, it must publish the revised lists within an additional six
months.
90-day Notification--Section 612(e) directs EPA to require
any person who produces a chemical substitute for a class I substance
to notify the Agency not less than 90 days before new or existing
chemicals are introduced into interstate commerce for significant new
uses as substitutes for a class I substance. The producer must also
provide the Agency with the producer's unpublished health and safety
studies on such substitutes.
Outreach--Section 612(b)(1) states that the Administrator
shall seek to maximize the use of Federal research facilities and
resources to assist users of class I and II substances in identifying
and developing alternatives to the use of such substances in key
commercial applications.
Clearinghouse--Section 612(b)(4) requires the Agency to
set up a public clearinghouse of alternative chemicals, product
substitutes, and alternative manufacturing processes that are available
for products and manufacturing processes which use class I and II
substances.
B. Regulatory History
On March 18, 1994, EPA published the final rulemaking (59 FR 13044)
that described the process for administering the SNAP program and
issued our first acceptability lists for substitutes in the major
industrial use sectors. These sectors include:
Refrigeration and air conditioning;
Foam blowing;
Solvents cleaning;
Fire suppression and explosion protection;
Sterilants;
Aerosols;
Adhesives, coatings and inks; and
Tobacco expansion.
These sectors comprise the principal industrial sectors that
historically consumed the largest volumes of ozone-depleting compounds.
As described in this original rule for the SNAP program, EPA does
not believe that rulemaking procedures are required to list
alternatives as acceptable with no limitations. Such listings do not
impose any sanction, nor do they remove any prior license to use a
substance. Therefore, by this notice we are adding substances to the
list of acceptable alternatives without first requesting comment on new
listings.
However, we do believe that notice-and-comment rulemaking is
required to place any substance on the list of prohibited substitutes,
to list a substance as acceptable only under certain conditions, to
list substances as acceptable only for certain uses, or to remove a
substance from the lists of prohibited or acceptable substitutes. We
publish updates to these lists as separate notices of rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
The Agency defines a ``substitute'' as any chemical, product
substitute, or alternative manufacturing process, whether existing or
new, intended for use as a replacement for a class I or class II
substance. Anyone who plans to market or produces a substitute for an
ODS in one of the eight major industrial use sectors must provide EPA
with health and safety studies on the substitute at least 90 days
before introducing it into interstate commerce for significant new use
as an alternative. This requirement applies to substitute
manufacturers, but may include importers, formulators, or end-users,
when they are responsible for introducing a substitute into commerce.
You can find a complete chronology of SNAP decisions and the
appropriate Federal Register citations from the SNAP section of EPA's
Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/
chron.html. This information is also available from the Air Docket (see
Addresses section above for contact information).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
Appendix A: Summary of Acceptable Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-use Substitute Decision Further information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centrifugal chillers (retrofit and R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
[[Page 56890]]
Screw chillers (retrofit and new).. R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Reciprocating chillers (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Industrial process refrigeration R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
(retrofit and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Industrial process air conditioning R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
(retrofit and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Retail food refrigeration (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Cold storage warehouses (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Refrigerated transport (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
[[Page 56891]]
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
R-407D as a substitute Acceptable.
for CFC-12.
Commercial ice machines (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Ice skating rinks (retrofit and R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Household refrigerators and R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
freezers (retrofit and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-421B (Choice R421B) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22, R-502, and
CFC-12.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Vending machines (retrofit and new) R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
Water coolers (retrofit and new)... R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
[[Page 56892]]
Residential dehumidifiers (retrofit R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable.
substitute for CFC-12.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Non-mechanical heat transfer ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
(retrofit and new). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
Household and light commercial air R-421A (Choice R421A) Acceptable.
conditioning and heat pumps as a substitute for
(retrofit and new). HCFC-22.
ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
R-424A (RS-44) as a Acceptable.
substitute for HCFC-
22.
Motor vehicle air conditioning ISCEON MO29 (R-422D) Acceptable.
(buses and passenger trains only). as a substitute for
HCFC-22.
Motor vehicle air conditioning..... R-426A (RS-24) as a Acceptable subject to Users must use the unique
substitute for CFC-12. use conditions. fittings and label
specified by the
manufacturer. Use is
subject to requirements
under Sec. 609 of the
Clean Air Act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foam Blowing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polystyrene, Extruded Boardstock & Ecomate TM as a Acceptable. OSHA established a
Billet. substitute for CFCs permissible exposure limit
and HCFCs. for the main component of
Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for
a time-weighted average
over an eight-hour work
shift.
Phenolic Insulation Board & Ecomate TM as a Acceptable. OSHA established a
Bunstock. substitute for CFCs permissible exposure limit
and HCFCs. for the main component of
Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for
a time-weighted average
over an eight-hour work
shift.
Flexible Polyurethane.............. Ecomate TM as a Acceptable. OSHA established a
substitute for CFCs permissible exposure limit
and HCFCs. for the main component of
Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for
a time-weighted average
over an eight-hour work
shift.
Polyurethane, Extruded Sheet....... Ecomate TM as a Acceptable. OSHA established a
substitute for CFCs permissible exposure limit
and HCFCs. for the main component of
Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for
a time-weighted average
over an eight-hour work
shift.
Polyolefin......................... Ecomate TM as a Acceptable. OSHA established a
substitute for CFCs permissible exposure limit
and HCFCs. for the main component of
Ecomate TM of 100 ppm for
a time-weighted average
over an eight-hour work
shift.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleaning Solvents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal cleaning..................... The Mini-Max Cleaner Acceptable.
[supreg] as a
substitute for CFC-
113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs.
Electronics cleaning............... The Mini-Max Cleaner Acceptable.
[supreg] as a
substitute for CFC-
113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs.
Precision cleaning................. The Mini-Max Cleaner Acceptable.
[supreg] as a
substitute for CFC-
113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56893]]
Aerosols
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerosol solvents................... The Mini-Max Cleaner Acceptable.
[supreg] as a
substitute for CFC-
113, methyl
chloroform, and HCFCs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterilants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterilants......................... The Mini-Max Cleaner Acceptable.
[supreg] as a
substitute for CFC-
12, HCFC-22, HCFC-
124, and blends
thereof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E6-15833 Filed 9-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P