Draft National Assessment of Efforts To Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters, 56529-56530 [E6-15837]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed Agreement for Recovery of Response Costs (‘‘Agreement,’’ Region 9 Docket No. 9– 2006–0010) pursuant to section 122(h) of CERCLA concerning the Denova Superfund Site, (the ‘‘Site’’), located in Rialto, California. The settling parties to the Agreement are Environmental Enterprises Inc., and Daniel J. McCabe. The Agreement compensates EPA for past response costs related to the removal action taken at the Site. The Agreement provides for a total recovery of $75,000.00. The Agreement also provides the settling parties with contribution protection under CERCLA 113(f)(2) for response cost paid under the Agreement. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this Notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the proposed Agreement. The Agency’s response to any comments will be available for public inspection at the Agency’s Region IX offices, located at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 27, 2006. ADDRESSES: The proposed Agreement may be obtained from Judith Winchell, Docket Clerk, telephone (415) 972–3124. Comments regarding the proposed Agreement should be addressed to Judith Winchell (SFD–7) at United States EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105, and should reference the Denova Superfund Site, Rialto, California, and USEPA Docket No. 9–2006–0010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Benson, Office of Regional Counsel, telephone (415) 972–3918, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105. Dated: August 10, 2006. Keith A. Takata, Director, Superfund Division. [FR Doc. E6–15904 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Draft National Assessment of Efforts To Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters Notice of draft report release and request for public comment. ACTION: SUMMARY: The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) publishes this notice to announce the availability VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Sep 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 of the Draft National Assessment of Efforts to Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters which was mandated by Congress in the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108– 456). This report reviews and evaluates short term harmful algal bloom (HAB) prediction techniques, and identifies current prevention, control and mitigation (PCM) programs and research for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs operating at the national, State, local and tribal level. DATES: Comments on this draft document must be submitted by 11/20/ 2006. ADDRESSES: The Draft National Assessment of Efforts to Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters will be available at the following location (https:// ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_iwgs. html). The public is encouraged to submit comments on the draft report electronically to Prediction.Response. Comments@noaa.gov. For those who do not have access to a computer, comments on the document may be submitted in writing to: Quay Dortch, NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR/COP, N/SCI2, NOAA, 1305 East West Highway, Building IV Rm 8220, Silver Spring, MD 20910. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quay Dortch by phone 301–713–3338 x157. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is publishing this draft report as mandated by the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Amendments Act 2004 (Pub. L. 108–456) to request public comments. The report is organized into five sections plus five appendices: (1) Executive Summary, (2) Legislative Background and Purpose of the Report, (3) Assessment of the Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Problem in U.S. Waters, (4) Prediction and Response Programs in the U.S. and (5) Opportunities for Advancement in Prediction and Response Efforts. Appendices include: Appendix I: Prediction and Response Programs in the U.S., Appendix II: Other National Programs, Appendix III: State, local, and tribal Prediction and Response Efforts, Appendix IV: International Programs related to HAB prediction and response, and Appendix V: Federal Register notice. Report Summary The Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–456) (HABHRCA 2004) reauthorized the original Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act (Pub. L. 105–383) of 1998 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56529 and stipulated generation of five reports to assess and recommend research programs on harmful algal blooms (HABs) and hypoxia in U.S. waters. Section 103 of HABHRCA 2004 requires a Prediction and Response Report. This report will review and evaluate HAB prediction and response techniques and identify current prevention, control and mitigation (PCM) programs for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs. Prediction and response are narrowly defined for the purpose of this report in order to avoid overlap with a subsequent report in this series, Scientific Assessment of Marine Harmful Algal Blooms. The Interagency Working Group on Harmful Algal Blooms, Hypoxia, and Human Health (IWG–4H) of the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology (JSOST), which was tasked with implementing HABHRCA 2004, streamlined the reporting process by linking the P&R report (Section 103) with the National Scientific Research, Development, Demonstration, and Technology Transfer Plan on Reducing Impacts from Harmful Algal Blooms (Section 104 RDDTT Plan). The P&R report will (1) detail Federal, State, and tribal prediction and response related research and impact assessments, (2) identify opportunities for improvement of prediction and response efforts and associated infrastructure, and (3) propose a process to evaluate current prediction and response programs in order to develop a coordinated research priorities plan (RDDTT Plan). The final step (3) will lead to the development of the second report (RDDTT Plan) stipulated by the HABHRCA legislation (Section 104). The P&R report and the RDDTT Plan together comprise a comprehensive evaluation and multistakeholder plan to improve the national and local response to HABs in U.S. waters. It is widely believed that the frequency and geographic distribution of HABs have been increasing worldwide. All U.S. coastal States have experienced HABs over the last decade. HAB frequency is also thought to be increasing in freshwater systems including ponds and lakes. In response, Federal, State, local, and tribal governments in collaboration with academic institutions have developed a variety of programs over the past 10 years both to understand HAB ecology and to minimize, prevent, or control HABs and HAB impacts in U.S. waters. As a result of the efforts initiated in 1993, there are now 16 Federal extramural funding programs which either specifically or generally target HAB prediction and response and 20 E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1 56530 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES intramural Federal research programs which are generating exciting new technologies for HAB monitoring and control. There are 2 major Federal multi-agency funding programs which represent important cross agency collaborative efforts. At least 25 States conduct HAB response efforts, operating through a wide range of State government departments and non profits. Tribes in some States are collaborating with academic, Federal, and State governments to monitor the presence of HABs. Given the global scope of HABs, U.S. programs also work closely with international programs and in some cases contribute funding. The P&R report describes the remarkable progress made in some areas by Federal prediction and response programs. The greatest effort and progress has been made in mitigation, including improved monitoring and prediction capabilities, the establishment of event response programs, the conduct of economic impact assessments, and establishment of public health measures. Studies leading to prevention and control have led to new approaches. Infrastructure is being developed, cooperation and coordination has improved and incentive based programs have been used to address HAB problems. Despite progress made, opportunities for advancing response to HABs still exist at the Federal and State level. The P&R report outlines opportunities for advancement identified by Federal agencies for HAB prediction and response and by the HAB community in the report, Harmful Algal Research and Response: A National Environmental Science Strategy (HARRNESS) 2005– 2015. (Ramsdell, J.S., Anderson, D.M., and Glibert, P.M. (eds.) Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC, 96pp, 2005). This FRN requests public comment on the state of prediction and response programs in the U.S. and suggestions for how to improve that response. Comments Request The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) welcomes all comments on the content of the Draft report. OSTP is specifically interested in feedback on (1) The current state of efforts (including infrastructure) in Prediction and Response to prevent, control, or mitigate Harmful Algal Blooms; (2) suggestions for specific improvements in those efforts. Please adhere to the instructions detailed below for preparing and submitting your comments on the Draft National Assessment of Efforts to Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Sep 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 Blooms in U.S. Waters. Using the format guidance described below will facilitate the processing of reviewer comments and assure that all comments are appropriately considered. Please format your comments into the following sections: (1) Background information for yourself including name, title, organizational affiliation and email or telephone (optional), (2) overview or general comments, (3) specific comments with reference to pages or line numbers where possible, and (4) specific comments about the current state of efforts in prevention, control and mitigation of HABs (PCM), including infrastructure. Please number and print identifying information at the top of all pages. Public comments may be submitted from September 27, 2006 to November 20, 2006. M. David Hodge, Operations Manager. [FR Doc. E6–15837 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am] questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to October 11, 2006. Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565–3525 or TDD (202) 565–3377. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Barbara Ransom, Room 707, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565–3525. Kamil Cook, Deputy General Counsel. [FR Doc. 06–8289 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6690–01–M FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION BILLING CODE 3170–W6–P Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review to the Office of Management and Budget EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES September 19, 2006. Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee (SAAC) of the ExportImport Bank of the United States (Export-Import Bank) SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 105–121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed to support the expansion of the Bank’s financial commitments in Sub-Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee and insurance programs of the Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank can facilitate greater support by U.S. commerical banks for trade with SubSaharan Africa. Time and Place: October 11, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571. Agenda: The meeting will include updates on Africa outreach with African Regional Financial Entities, Report on the ‘‘Working with African Lenders’’ seminar and the AGOA Forum, SAAC 2006 recommendations and International Business Development plans for Africa. Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be submitted on or before November 27, 2006. If you anticipate that you will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56529-56530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15837]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY


Draft National Assessment of Efforts To Predict and Respond to 
Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters

ACTION: Notice of draft report release and request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) publishes 
this notice to announce the availability of the Draft National 
Assessment of Efforts to Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in 
U.S. Waters which was mandated by Congress in the Harmful Algal Bloom 
and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-456). This report 
reviews and evaluates short term harmful algal bloom (HAB) prediction 
techniques, and identifies current prevention, control and mitigation 
(PCM) programs and research for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs 
operating at the national, State, local and tribal level.

DATES: Comments on this draft document must be submitted by 11/20/2006.

ADDRESSES: The Draft National Assessment of Efforts to Predict and 
Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters will be available at the 
following location (https://ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_iwgs.html). 
The public is encouraged to submit  
comments on the draft report electronically to 
E-mail: Prediction.Response.Comments@noaa.gov. For those who do 
not have access to a computer, comments on the document may be 
submitted in writing to: Quay Dortch, NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR/
COP, N/SCI2, NOAA, 1305 East West Highway, Building IV Rm 8220, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quay Dortch by phone 301-713-3338 
x157.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is publishing this draft report as 
mandated by the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Amendments Act 2004 
(Pub. L. 108-456) to request public comments. The report is organized 
into five sections plus five appendices: (1) Executive Summary, (2) 
Legislative Background and Purpose of the Report, (3) Assessment of the 
Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Problem in U.S. Waters, (4) Prediction and 
Response Programs in the U.S. and (5) Opportunities for Advancement in 
Prediction and Response Efforts. Appendices include: Appendix I: 
Prediction and Response Programs in the U.S., Appendix II: Other 
National Programs, Appendix III: State, local, and tribal Prediction 
and Response Efforts, Appendix IV: International Programs related to 
HAB prediction and response, and Appendix V: Federal Register notice.

Report Summary

    The Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 
108-456) (HABHRCA 2004) reauthorized the original Harmful Algal Bloom 
and Hypoxia Research and Control Act (Pub. L. 105-383) of 1998 and 
stipulated generation of five reports to assess and recommend research 
programs on harmful algal blooms (HABs) and hypoxia in U.S. waters. 
Section 103 of HABHRCA 2004 requires a Prediction and Response Report. 
This report will review and evaluate HAB prediction and response 
techniques and identify current prevention, control and mitigation 
(PCM) programs for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs. Prediction 
and response are narrowly defined for the purpose of this report in 
order to avoid overlap with a subsequent report in this series, 
Scientific Assessment of Marine Harmful Algal Blooms.
    The Interagency Working Group on Harmful Algal Blooms, Hypoxia, and 
Human Health (IWG-4H) of the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and 
Technology (JSOST), which was tasked with implementing HABHRCA 2004, 
streamlined the reporting process by linking the P&R report (Section 
103) with the National Scientific Research, Development, Demonstration, 
and Technology Transfer Plan on Reducing Impacts from Harmful Algal 
Blooms (Section 104 RDDTT Plan). The P&R report will (1) detail 
Federal, State, and tribal prediction and response related research and 
impact assessments, (2) identify opportunities for improvement of 
prediction and response efforts and associated infrastructure, and (3) 
propose a process to evaluate current prediction and response programs 
in order to develop a coordinated research priorities plan (RDDTT 
Plan). The final step (3) will lead to the development of the second 
report (RDDTT Plan) stipulated by the HABHRCA legislation (Section 
104). The P&R report and the RDDTT Plan together comprise a 
comprehensive evaluation and multi-stakeholder plan to improve the 
national and local response to HABs in U.S. waters.
    It is widely believed that the frequency and geographic 
distribution of HABs have been increasing worldwide. All U.S. coastal 
States have experienced HABs over the last decade. HAB frequency is 
also thought to be increasing in freshwater systems including ponds and 
lakes. In response, Federal, State, local, and tribal governments in 
collaboration with academic institutions have developed a variety of 
programs over the past 10 years both to understand HAB ecology and to 
minimize, prevent, or control HABs and HAB impacts in U.S. waters.
    As a result of the efforts initiated in 1993, there are now 16 
Federal extramural funding programs which either specifically or 
generally target HAB prediction and response and 20

[[Page 56530]]

intramural Federal research programs which are generating exciting new 
technologies for HAB monitoring and control. There are 2 major Federal 
multi-agency funding programs which represent important cross agency 
collaborative efforts. At least 25 States conduct HAB response efforts, 
operating through a wide range of State government departments and non 
profits. Tribes in some States are collaborating with academic, 
Federal, and State governments to monitor the presence of HABs. Given 
the global scope of HABs, U.S. programs also work closely with 
international programs and in some cases contribute funding.
    The P&R report describes the remarkable progress made in some areas 
by Federal prediction and response programs. The greatest effort and 
progress has been made in mitigation, including improved monitoring and 
prediction capabilities, the establishment of event response programs, 
the conduct of economic impact assessments, and establishment of public 
health measures. Studies leading to prevention and control have led to 
new approaches. Infrastructure is being developed, cooperation and 
coordination has improved and incentive based programs have been used 
to address HAB problems.
    Despite progress made, opportunities for advancing response to HABs 
still exist at the Federal and State level. The P&R report outlines 
opportunities for advancement identified by Federal agencies for HAB 
prediction and response and by the HAB community in the report, Harmful 
Algal Research and Response: A National Environmental Science Strategy 
(HARRNESS) 2005-2015. (Ramsdell, J.S., Anderson, D.M., and Glibert, 
P.M. (eds.) Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC, 96pp, 2005). 
This FRN requests public comment on the state of prediction and 
response programs in the U.S. and suggestions for how to improve that 
response.

Comments Request

    The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) welcomes all 
comments on the content of the Draft report. OSTP is specifically 
interested in feedback on
    (1) The current state of efforts (including infrastructure) in 
Prediction and Response to prevent, control, or mitigate Harmful Algal 
Blooms;
    (2) suggestions for specific improvements in those efforts.
    Please adhere to the instructions detailed below for preparing and 
submitting your comments on the Draft National Assessment of Efforts to 
Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters. Using the 
format guidance described below will facilitate the processing of 
reviewer comments and assure that all comments are appropriately 
considered. Please format your comments into the following sections: 
(1) Background information for yourself including name, title, 
organizational affiliation and email or telephone (optional), (2) 
overview or general comments, (3) specific comments with reference to 
pages or line numbers where possible, and (4) specific comments about 
the current state of efforts in prevention, control and mitigation of 
HABs (PCM), including infrastructure. Please number and print 
identifying information at the top of all pages.
    Public comments may be submitted from September 27, 2006 to 
November 20, 2006.

M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
 [FR Doc. E6-15837 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-W6-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.