Draft National Assessment of Efforts To Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters, 56529-56530 [E6-15837]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices
amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is
hereby given of a proposed Agreement
for Recovery of Response Costs
(‘‘Agreement,’’ Region 9 Docket No. 9–
2006–0010) pursuant to section 122(h)
of CERCLA concerning the Denova
Superfund Site, (the ‘‘Site’’), located in
Rialto, California. The settling parties to
the Agreement are Environmental
Enterprises Inc., and Daniel J. McCabe.
The Agreement compensates EPA for
past response costs related to the
removal action taken at the Site. The
Agreement provides for a total recovery
of $75,000.00. The Agreement also
provides the settling parties with
contribution protection under CERCLA
113(f)(2) for response cost paid under
the Agreement.
For thirty (30) days following the date
of publication of this Notice, the Agency
will receive written comments relating
to the proposed Agreement. The
Agency’s response to any comments
will be available for public inspection at
the Agency’s Region IX offices, located
at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before October 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The proposed Agreement
may be obtained from Judith Winchell,
Docket Clerk, telephone (415) 972–3124.
Comments regarding the proposed
Agreement should be addressed to
Judith Winchell (SFD–7) at United
States EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California 94105,
and should reference the Denova
Superfund Site, Rialto, California, and
USEPA Docket No. 9–2006–0010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Benson, Office of Regional
Counsel, telephone (415) 972–3918, U.S.
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105.
Dated: August 10, 2006.
Keith A. Takata,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. E6–15904 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Draft National Assessment of Efforts
To Predict and Respond to Harmful
Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters
Notice of draft report release
and request for public comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP) publishes
this notice to announce the availability
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
of the Draft National Assessment of
Efforts to Predict and Respond to
Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters
which was mandated by Congress in the
Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia
Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
456). This report reviews and evaluates
short term harmful algal bloom (HAB)
prediction techniques, and identifies
current prevention, control and
mitigation (PCM) programs and research
for freshwater, estuarine and marine
HABs operating at the national, State,
local and tribal level.
DATES: Comments on this draft
document must be submitted by 11/20/
2006.
ADDRESSES: The Draft National
Assessment of Efforts to Predict and
Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in
U.S. Waters will be available at the
following location (https://
ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_iwgs.
html). The public is encouraged to
submit comments on the draft report
electronically to Prediction.Response.
Comments@noaa.gov. For those who do
not have access to a computer,
comments on the document may be
submitted in writing to: Quay Dortch,
NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR/COP, N/SCI2,
NOAA, 1305 East West Highway,
Building IV Rm 8220, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quay Dortch by phone 301–713–3338
x157.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is
publishing this draft report as mandated
by the Harmful Algal Blooms and
Hypoxia Amendments Act 2004 (Pub. L.
108–456) to request public comments.
The report is organized into five
sections plus five appendices: (1)
Executive Summary, (2) Legislative
Background and Purpose of the Report,
(3) Assessment of the Harmful Algal
Bloom (HAB) Problem in U.S. Waters,
(4) Prediction and Response Programs in
the U.S. and (5) Opportunities for
Advancement in Prediction and
Response Efforts. Appendices include:
Appendix I: Prediction and Response
Programs in the U.S., Appendix II:
Other National Programs, Appendix III:
State, local, and tribal Prediction and
Response Efforts, Appendix IV:
International Programs related to HAB
prediction and response, and Appendix
V: Federal Register notice.
Report Summary
The Harmful Algal Bloom and
Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108–456) (HABHRCA 2004)
reauthorized the original Harmful Algal
Bloom and Hypoxia Research and
Control Act (Pub. L. 105–383) of 1998
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56529
and stipulated generation of five reports
to assess and recommend research
programs on harmful algal blooms
(HABs) and hypoxia in U.S. waters.
Section 103 of HABHRCA 2004 requires
a Prediction and Response Report. This
report will review and evaluate HAB
prediction and response techniques and
identify current prevention, control and
mitigation (PCM) programs for
freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs.
Prediction and response are narrowly
defined for the purpose of this report in
order to avoid overlap with a
subsequent report in this series,
Scientific Assessment of Marine
Harmful Algal Blooms.
The Interagency Working Group on
Harmful Algal Blooms, Hypoxia, and
Human Health (IWG–4H) of the Joint
Subcommittee on Ocean Science and
Technology (JSOST), which was tasked
with implementing HABHRCA 2004,
streamlined the reporting process by
linking the P&R report (Section 103)
with the National Scientific Research,
Development, Demonstration, and
Technology Transfer Plan on Reducing
Impacts from Harmful Algal Blooms
(Section 104 RDDTT Plan). The P&R
report will (1) detail Federal, State, and
tribal prediction and response related
research and impact assessments, (2)
identify opportunities for improvement
of prediction and response efforts and
associated infrastructure, and (3)
propose a process to evaluate current
prediction and response programs in
order to develop a coordinated research
priorities plan (RDDTT Plan). The final
step (3) will lead to the development of
the second report (RDDTT Plan)
stipulated by the HABHRCA legislation
(Section 104). The P&R report and the
RDDTT Plan together comprise a
comprehensive evaluation and multistakeholder plan to improve the
national and local response to HABs in
U.S. waters.
It is widely believed that the
frequency and geographic distribution
of HABs have been increasing
worldwide. All U.S. coastal States have
experienced HABs over the last decade.
HAB frequency is also thought to be
increasing in freshwater systems
including ponds and lakes. In response,
Federal, State, local, and tribal
governments in collaboration with
academic institutions have developed a
variety of programs over the past 10
years both to understand HAB ecology
and to minimize, prevent, or control
HABs and HAB impacts in U.S. waters.
As a result of the efforts initiated in
1993, there are now 16 Federal
extramural funding programs which
either specifically or generally target
HAB prediction and response and 20
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
56530
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
intramural Federal research programs
which are generating exciting new
technologies for HAB monitoring and
control. There are 2 major Federal
multi-agency funding programs which
represent important cross agency
collaborative efforts. At least 25 States
conduct HAB response efforts, operating
through a wide range of State
government departments and non
profits. Tribes in some States are
collaborating with academic, Federal,
and State governments to monitor the
presence of HABs. Given the global
scope of HABs, U.S. programs also work
closely with international programs and
in some cases contribute funding.
The P&R report describes the
remarkable progress made in some areas
by Federal prediction and response
programs. The greatest effort and
progress has been made in mitigation,
including improved monitoring and
prediction capabilities, the
establishment of event response
programs, the conduct of economic
impact assessments, and establishment
of public health measures. Studies
leading to prevention and control have
led to new approaches. Infrastructure is
being developed, cooperation and
coordination has improved and
incentive based programs have been
used to address HAB problems.
Despite progress made, opportunities
for advancing response to HABs still
exist at the Federal and State level. The
P&R report outlines opportunities for
advancement identified by Federal
agencies for HAB prediction and
response and by the HAB community in
the report, Harmful Algal Research and
Response: A National Environmental
Science Strategy (HARRNESS) 2005–
2015. (Ramsdell, J.S., Anderson, D.M.,
and Glibert, P.M. (eds.) Ecological
Society of America, Washington, DC,
96pp, 2005). This FRN requests public
comment on the state of prediction and
response programs in the U.S. and
suggestions for how to improve that
response.
Comments Request
The Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP) welcomes all comments
on the content of the Draft report. OSTP
is specifically interested in feedback on
(1) The current state of efforts
(including infrastructure) in Prediction
and Response to prevent, control, or
mitigate Harmful Algal Blooms;
(2) suggestions for specific
improvements in those efforts.
Please adhere to the instructions
detailed below for preparing and
submitting your comments on the Draft
National Assessment of Efforts to
Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
Blooms in U.S. Waters. Using the format
guidance described below will facilitate
the processing of reviewer comments
and assure that all comments are
appropriately considered. Please format
your comments into the following
sections: (1) Background information for
yourself including name, title,
organizational affiliation and email or
telephone (optional), (2) overview or
general comments, (3) specific
comments with reference to pages or
line numbers where possible, and (4)
specific comments about the current
state of efforts in prevention, control
and mitigation of HABs (PCM),
including infrastructure. Please number
and print identifying information at the
top of all pages.
Public comments may be submitted
from September 27, 2006 to November
20, 2006.
M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. E6–15837 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
questions or comments. Members of the
public may also file written statement(s)
before or after the meeting. If any person
wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign
language interpreter) or other special
accommodations, please contact, prior
to October 11, 2006. Barbara Ransom,
Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202)
565–3525 or TDD (202) 565–3377.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, contact Barbara
Ransom, Room 707, 811 Vermont
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571,
(202) 565–3525.
Kamil Cook,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06–8289 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690–01–M
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 3170–W6–P
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE
UNITED STATES
September 19, 2006.
Notice of Open Special Meeting of the
Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory
Committee (SAAC) of the ExportImport Bank of the United States
(Export-Import Bank)
SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa
Advisory Committee was established by
Public Law 105–121, November 26,
1997, to advise the Board of Directors on
the development and implementation of
policies and programs designed to
support the expansion of the Bank’s
financial commitments in Sub-Saharan
Africa under the loan, guarantee and
insurance programs of the Bank.
Further, the committee shall make
recommendations on how the Bank can
facilitate greater support by U.S.
commerical banks for trade with SubSaharan Africa.
Time and Place: October 11, 2006 at
10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meting will
be held at the Export-Import Bank in
Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20571.
Agenda: The meeting will include
updates on Africa outreach with African
Regional Financial Entities, Report on
the ‘‘Working with African Lenders’’
seminar and the AGOA Forum, SAAC
2006 recommendations and
International Business Development
plans for Africa.
Public Participation: The meeting will
be open to public participation and the
last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 27,
2006. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56529-56530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15837]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Draft National Assessment of Efforts To Predict and Respond to
Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters
ACTION: Notice of draft report release and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) publishes
this notice to announce the availability of the Draft National
Assessment of Efforts to Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in
U.S. Waters which was mandated by Congress in the Harmful Algal Bloom
and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-456). This report
reviews and evaluates short term harmful algal bloom (HAB) prediction
techniques, and identifies current prevention, control and mitigation
(PCM) programs and research for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs
operating at the national, State, local and tribal level.
DATES: Comments on this draft document must be submitted by 11/20/2006.
ADDRESSES: The Draft National Assessment of Efforts to Predict and
Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters will be available at the
following location (https://ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_iwgs.html).
The public is encouraged to submit
comments on the draft report electronically to
E-mail: Prediction.Response.Comments@noaa.gov. For those who do
not have access to a computer, comments on the document may be
submitted in writing to: Quay Dortch, NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR/
COP, N/SCI2, NOAA, 1305 East West Highway, Building IV Rm 8220,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quay Dortch by phone 301-713-3338
x157.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is publishing this draft report as
mandated by the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Amendments Act 2004
(Pub. L. 108-456) to request public comments. The report is organized
into five sections plus five appendices: (1) Executive Summary, (2)
Legislative Background and Purpose of the Report, (3) Assessment of the
Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Problem in U.S. Waters, (4) Prediction and
Response Programs in the U.S. and (5) Opportunities for Advancement in
Prediction and Response Efforts. Appendices include: Appendix I:
Prediction and Response Programs in the U.S., Appendix II: Other
National Programs, Appendix III: State, local, and tribal Prediction
and Response Efforts, Appendix IV: International Programs related to
HAB prediction and response, and Appendix V: Federal Register notice.
Report Summary
The Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004 (Pub. L.
108-456) (HABHRCA 2004) reauthorized the original Harmful Algal Bloom
and Hypoxia Research and Control Act (Pub. L. 105-383) of 1998 and
stipulated generation of five reports to assess and recommend research
programs on harmful algal blooms (HABs) and hypoxia in U.S. waters.
Section 103 of HABHRCA 2004 requires a Prediction and Response Report.
This report will review and evaluate HAB prediction and response
techniques and identify current prevention, control and mitigation
(PCM) programs for freshwater, estuarine and marine HABs. Prediction
and response are narrowly defined for the purpose of this report in
order to avoid overlap with a subsequent report in this series,
Scientific Assessment of Marine Harmful Algal Blooms.
The Interagency Working Group on Harmful Algal Blooms, Hypoxia, and
Human Health (IWG-4H) of the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and
Technology (JSOST), which was tasked with implementing HABHRCA 2004,
streamlined the reporting process by linking the P&R report (Section
103) with the National Scientific Research, Development, Demonstration,
and Technology Transfer Plan on Reducing Impacts from Harmful Algal
Blooms (Section 104 RDDTT Plan). The P&R report will (1) detail
Federal, State, and tribal prediction and response related research and
impact assessments, (2) identify opportunities for improvement of
prediction and response efforts and associated infrastructure, and (3)
propose a process to evaluate current prediction and response programs
in order to develop a coordinated research priorities plan (RDDTT
Plan). The final step (3) will lead to the development of the second
report (RDDTT Plan) stipulated by the HABHRCA legislation (Section
104). The P&R report and the RDDTT Plan together comprise a
comprehensive evaluation and multi-stakeholder plan to improve the
national and local response to HABs in U.S. waters.
It is widely believed that the frequency and geographic
distribution of HABs have been increasing worldwide. All U.S. coastal
States have experienced HABs over the last decade. HAB frequency is
also thought to be increasing in freshwater systems including ponds and
lakes. In response, Federal, State, local, and tribal governments in
collaboration with academic institutions have developed a variety of
programs over the past 10 years both to understand HAB ecology and to
minimize, prevent, or control HABs and HAB impacts in U.S. waters.
As a result of the efforts initiated in 1993, there are now 16
Federal extramural funding programs which either specifically or
generally target HAB prediction and response and 20
[[Page 56530]]
intramural Federal research programs which are generating exciting new
technologies for HAB monitoring and control. There are 2 major Federal
multi-agency funding programs which represent important cross agency
collaborative efforts. At least 25 States conduct HAB response efforts,
operating through a wide range of State government departments and non
profits. Tribes in some States are collaborating with academic,
Federal, and State governments to monitor the presence of HABs. Given
the global scope of HABs, U.S. programs also work closely with
international programs and in some cases contribute funding.
The P&R report describes the remarkable progress made in some areas
by Federal prediction and response programs. The greatest effort and
progress has been made in mitigation, including improved monitoring and
prediction capabilities, the establishment of event response programs,
the conduct of economic impact assessments, and establishment of public
health measures. Studies leading to prevention and control have led to
new approaches. Infrastructure is being developed, cooperation and
coordination has improved and incentive based programs have been used
to address HAB problems.
Despite progress made, opportunities for advancing response to HABs
still exist at the Federal and State level. The P&R report outlines
opportunities for advancement identified by Federal agencies for HAB
prediction and response and by the HAB community in the report, Harmful
Algal Research and Response: A National Environmental Science Strategy
(HARRNESS) 2005-2015. (Ramsdell, J.S., Anderson, D.M., and Glibert,
P.M. (eds.) Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC, 96pp, 2005).
This FRN requests public comment on the state of prediction and
response programs in the U.S. and suggestions for how to improve that
response.
Comments Request
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) welcomes all
comments on the content of the Draft report. OSTP is specifically
interested in feedback on
(1) The current state of efforts (including infrastructure) in
Prediction and Response to prevent, control, or mitigate Harmful Algal
Blooms;
(2) suggestions for specific improvements in those efforts.
Please adhere to the instructions detailed below for preparing and
submitting your comments on the Draft National Assessment of Efforts to
Predict and Respond to Harmful Algal Blooms in U.S. Waters. Using the
format guidance described below will facilitate the processing of
reviewer comments and assure that all comments are appropriately
considered. Please format your comments into the following sections:
(1) Background information for yourself including name, title,
organizational affiliation and email or telephone (optional), (2)
overview or general comments, (3) specific comments with reference to
pages or line numbers where possible, and (4) specific comments about
the current state of efforts in prevention, control and mitigation of
HABs (PCM), including infrastructure. Please number and print
identifying information at the top of all pages.
Public comments may be submitted from September 27, 2006 to
November 20, 2006.
M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. E6-15837 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-W6-P