Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval of New York State Plan Amendment 05-50, 56536-56538 [E6-15779]
Download as PDF
56536
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices
(2) What are the market segments for
the personal health records marketplace
and what are the characteristics of the
consumers and vendors for each
segment?
The meeting will be available via Web
cast at https://www.eventcenterlive.com/
cfmx/ec/login/login1.cfm?BID=67.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Mine Safety and Health Research
Advisory Committee: Meeting
Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of
Disapproval of New York State Plan
Amendment 05–50
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information
Community, Office of Programs and
Coordination, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06–8295 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
announces the following committee
meeting.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4150–24–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Breast and Cervical Cancer Early
Detection and Control Advisory
Committee: Notice of Charter Renewal
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
This gives notice under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463) of October 6, 1972, that the Breast
and Cervical Cancer Early Detection and
Control Advisory Committee, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Health and Human
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year
period through September 12, 2008.
For information, contact Debra
Younginer, Executive Secretary, Breast
and Cervical Cancer Early Detection and
Control Advisory Committee, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Health and Human
Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE.,
Mailstop K57, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,
telephone 770/488–1074 or fax 770/
488–3230.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities, for both CDC
and the Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry.
Dated: September 20, 2006.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office.
[FR Doc. E6–15846 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Name: Mine Safety and Health Research
Advisory Committee (MSHRAC).
Times and Dates: 9 a.m.–4:45 p.m.,
October 17, 2006. 8:45 a.m.–12:15 p.m.,
October 18, 2006.
Place: Hilton Garden Inn Pittsburgh/
Southpointe, 1000 Corporate Drive,
Canonsburg, PA 15317, telephone (724) 743–
5000, fax (724) 743–5010.
Status: Open to the public, limited only by
the space available. The meeting room
accommodates approximately 50 people.
Purpose: This committee is charged with
providing advice to the Secretary,
Department of Health and Human Services;
the Director, CDC; and the Director, NIOSH,
on priorities in mine safety and health
research, including grants and contracts for
such research, 30 U.S.C. 812(b)(2), Section
102(b)(2).
Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will
focus on current and planned NIOSH
research related to mine disaster prevention
and response and impact of the new Mine
Improvement and New Emergency Response
Act of 2006 (Miners Act) on the research
plans. The agenda will also include an
update on the Miners Choice Program and a
report from the Associate Director for
Mining.
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities dictate.
For Further Information Contact: Jeffery L.
Kohler, PhD, Executive Secretary, MSHRAC,
NIOSH, CDC,626 Cochrans Mill Road,
telephone (412) 386–5301, fax (412) 386–
5300.
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office, has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Dated: September 20, 2006.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. E6–15845 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:34 Sep 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Hearing.
SUMMARY: This notice announces an
administrative hearing to be held on
December 6, 2006, at 26 Federal Plaza,
New York, NY 10278, Room 38–110a, to
reconsider CMS’ decision to disapprove
New York State plan amendment 05–50.
Closing Date: Requests to participate
in the hearing as a party must be
received by the presiding officer by
October 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Scully-Hayes, Presiding
Officer, CMS, Lord Baltimore Drive,
Mail Stop LB–23–20, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, telephone: (410) 786–
2055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces an administrative
hearing to reconsider CMS’ decision to
disapprove New York State plan
amendment (SPA) 05–50 which was
submitted on September 29, 2005. This
SPA was disapproved on June 23, 2006.
Under SPA 05–50, New York
proposed to extend payment provisions
for New York’s Indigent Care Program
for certain diagnostic and treatment
centers. The amendment was
disapproved because it did not comport
with the requirements of section
1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), 1902(a)(30)(A),
and 1905(a) of the Social Security Act
(the Act).
At issue on reconsideration is: (1)
Whether the proposed payments under
SPA 05–50 would be for services
furnished to individuals within the
statutory categories of permissible
eligible individuals set forth in sections
1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the Act; (2)
whether the proposed payments under
SPA 05–50 would result in claims for
Federal financial participation that
would not be within the scope of
medical assistance which would be
inconsistent with sections 1902(a)(4),
1902(a)(10), and 1905(a) of the Act; and
(3) whether the State has demonstrated
that the proposed payment rate, which
would provide for payments unrelated
to the covered Medicaid services
furnished by the provider, is an efficient
and economical method to pay for
covered Medicaid services, consistent
with the requirements of section
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices
1902(a)(30)(A). The basis for these
issues was set out in the disapproval
determination and is summarized
below.
Section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires
that State Medicaid plans provide for
methods of administration that are
found by the Secretary to be necessary
for the proper and efficient operation of
the plan. Section 1902(a)(10) of the Act
sets forth mandatory and optional
groups of individuals for whom States
may make medical assistance available
under a State plan. Section 1902(a)(10)
of the Act must be read in concert with
the definition of medical assistance at
section 1905(a), which includes
additional specification of the categories
of eligible individuals. SPA 05–50
would provide for payment for services
furnished to individuals who are not
within the listed groups or categories of
individuals for whom medical
assistance is authorized under the
statute. Such payment is outside the
scope of the definition of medical
assistance. Including in the State plan a
provision which would pay for provider
costs that are not within the scope of
medical assistance furnished to eligible
individuals is not necessary for the
proper and efficient operation of the
plan. It will result in State claims for
Federal financial participation in
expenditures as medical assistance,
which are not within the statutory
definition of medical assistance.
The requirements of section
1902(a)(10) of the Act, read in concert
with section 1905(a) of the Act, as noted
above, define the range of individuals
who must or may be eligible under a
State plan, and the scope of medical
assistance that may be made available.
These sections do not provide for
payment of provider costs of treating
ineligible individuals, which is the
apparent purpose of the Indigent Care
Program.
Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act
requires that State plans provide
payment methods for care and services
available under the plan that are
consistent with efficiency, economy,
and quality of care. The proposed
Medicaid payment method is
determined by the individual diagnostic
and treatment center’s level of
uncompensated care associated with
uninsured patients and distributed
without regard to the volume of
Medicaid activity in the facility. The
specific Medicaid reimbursement
methodology applies a Medicaid rate to
bad debt and charity care visits in the
facility. This method results in an
aggregate Medicaid payment which
clearly is without regard to the
provision of covered Medicaid services
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
to eligible individuals, and cannot be
considered an economical means of
paying for such services.
Section 1116 of the Act and Federal
regulations at 42 CFR part 430, establish
Department procedures that provide an
administrative hearing for
reconsideration of a disapproval of a
State plan or plan amendment. CMS is
required to publish a copy of the notice
to a State Medicaid agency that informs
the agency of the time and place of the
hearing, and the issues to be considered.
If we subsequently notify the agency of
additional issues that will be considered
at the hearing, we will also publish that
notice.
Any individual or group that wants to
participate in the hearing as a party
must petition the presiding officer
within 15 days after publication of this
notice, in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or
organization that wants to participate as
amicus curiae must petition the
presiding officer before the hearing
begins in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
430.76(c). If the hearing is later
rescheduled, the presiding officer will
notify all participants.
The notice to New York announcing
an administrative hearing to reconsider
the disapproval of its SPA reads as
follows:
Mr. Gregor N. Macmillan, Director, Bureau of
Medicaid Law, State of New York,
Department of Health, Corning Tower, The
Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire
State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237.
Dear Mr. Macmillan: I am responding to
your request for reconsideration of the
decision to disapprove the New York State
plan amendment (SPA) 05–50, which was
submitted on September 29, 2005, and
disapproved on June 23, 2006.
Under SPA 05–50, New York was
proposing to extend payment provisions for
New York’s Indigent Care Program for certain
diagnostic and treatment centers. The
amendment was disapproved because it did
not comport with the requirements of section
1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), 1902(a)(30)(A), and
1905(a) of the Social Security Act (the Act).
At issue on reconsideration is: (1) Whether
the proposed payments under SPA 05–050
would be for services furnished to
individuals within the statutory categories of
permissible eligible individuals set forth in
sections 1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the Act;
(2) whether the proposed payments under
SPA 05–50 would result in claims for Federal
financial participation that would not be
within the scope of medical assistance which
would be inconsistent with sections
1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), and 1905(a) of the
Act; and (3) whether the State has
demonstrated that the proposed payment
rate, which would provide for payments
unrelated to the covered Medicaid services
furnished by the provider, is an efficient and
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56537
economical method to pay for covered
Medicaid services, consistent with the
requirements of section 1902(a)(30)(A). The
basis for these issues was set out in the
disapproval determination and is
summarized below.
Section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires that
State Medicaid plans provide for methods of
administration that are found by the
Secretary to be necessary for the proper and
efficient operation of the plan. Section
1902(a)(10) of the Act sets forth mandatory
and optional groups of individuals for whom
States may make medical assistance available
under a State plan. Section 1902(a)(10) of the
Act must be read in concert with the
definition of medical assistance at section
1905(a), which includes additional
specification of the categories of eligible
individuals. SPA 05–50 would provide for
payment for services furnished to individuals
who are not within the listed groups or
categories of individuals for whom medical
assistance is authorized under the statute.
Such payment is outside the scope of the
definition of medical assistance. Including in
the State plan a provision which would pay
for provider costs that are not within the
scope of medical assistance furnished to
eligible individuals is not necessary for the
proper and efficient operation of the plan. It
will result in State claims for Federal
financial participation in expenditures as
medical assistance, which are not within the
statutory definition of medical assistance.
The requirements of section 1902(a)(10) of
the Act, read in concert with section 1905(a)
of the Act, as noted above, define the range
of individuals who must or may be eligible
under a State plan, and the scope of medical
assistance that may be made available. These
sections do not provide for payment of
provider costs of treating ineligible
individuals, which is the apparent purpose of
the Indigent Care Program.
Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act requires
that State plans provide payment methods for
care and services available under the plan
that are consistent with efficiency, economy,
and quality of care. The proposed Medicaid
payment method is determined by the
individual diagnostic and treatment center’s
level of uncompensated care associated with
uninsured patients and distributed without
regard to the volume of Medicaid activity in
the facility. The specific Medicaid
reimbursement methodology applies a
Medicaid rate to bad debt and charity care
visits in the facility. This method results in
an aggregate Medicaid payment which
clearly is without regard to the provision of
covered Medicaid services to eligible
individuals, and cannot be considered an
economical means of paying for such
services. For the reasons cited above, and
after consultation with the Secretary, as
required by Federal regulations at 42 CFR
430.15(c)(2), New York 05–50 was
disapproved on June 23, 2006.
I am scheduling a hearing on your request
for reconsideration to be held on December
6, 2006, at 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY
10278, Room 38–110a, to reconsider the
decision to disapprove SPA 05–50. If this
date is not acceptable, we would be glad to
set another date that is mutually agreeable to
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
56538
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 27, 2006 / Notices
the parties. The hearing will be governed by
the procedures prescribed at 42 CFR part 430.
I am designating Ms. Kathleen ScullyHayes as the presiding officer. If these
arrangements present any problems, please
contact the presiding officer at (410) 786–
2055. In order to facilitate any
communication which may be necessary
between the parties to the hearing, please
notify the presiding officer to indicate
acceptability of the hearing date that has
been scheduled and provide names of the
individuals who will represent the State at
the hearing.
Sincerely,
Mark B. McClellan, M.D., PhD.
(Section 1116 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. section 1316); 42 CFR section 430.18)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
program No. 13.714, Medicaid Assistance
Program.)
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E6–15779 Filed 9–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of
Disapproval of Missouri State Plan
Amendment 05–11
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of hearing.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces an
administrative hearing to be held on
November 15, 2006, at the Richard
Bolling Federal Building, 601 E. 12th
Street, Kansas City, MO 64106–2898,
the Kansas City Room, to reconsider
CMS’ decision to disapprove Missouri
State plan amendment 05–11.
Closing Date: Requests to participate
in the hearing as a party must be
received by the presiding officer by
October 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Scully-Hayes, Presiding
Officer, CMS Lord Baltimore Drive, Mail
Stop LB–23–20, Baltimore, Maryland
21244, telephone: (410) 786–2055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces an administrative
hearing to reconsider CMS’ decision to
disapprove Missouri State plan
amendment (SPA) 05–11 which was
submitted on September 27, 2005. This
SPA was disapproved on June 16, 2006.
Under SPA 05–11, Missouri proposed to
alter the provider qualifications and
payment methodology for personal care
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
assistance services by transferring
administrative responsibility for such
providers from one State agency to
another.
At issue is: (1) Whether SPA 05–11
complied with the requirements of
section 1902(a) of the Social Security
Act (the Act) generally, and 1902(a)(30)
of the Act specifically, in providing for
coverage of services for which the State
plan did not contain a clear payment
methodology that the State had shown
was consistent with efficiency and
economy; (2) whether the proposed
coverage of personal care services in
SPA 05–11 was consistent with the
definition of personal care services in
section 1905(a)(24) of the Act (which is
integral to the definition of ‘‘medical
assistance’’ in sections 1905(a) and
1902(a)(10)(A) of the Act), and
applicable regulations, including
services of registered nurses.
This amendment was disapproved
because the resulting plan would not
have comported with the requirements
of section 1902(a)(30)(A) and section
1905(a)(24) of the Act and implementing
regulations.
Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act
requires that State plans have methods
and procedures to assure that payments
are consistent with economy, efficiency,
and quality of care. While this SPA
would have provided for coverage of
personal care services, the methodology
for paying for such services was not
clearly set forth in the State plan.
Moreover, Missouri provided
information that personal care services,
and personal care assistance services,
are reimbursed based on a 15-minute
service unit. However, the State did not
provide to CMS the rate for the 15minute service unit, or any rate
derivation information, to conclude that
this payment is economic or efficient. In
light of this, CMS cannot conclude that
the coverage of the proposed services
would have been accomplished through
an efficient and economical payment
methodology in compliance with the
requirements of section 1902(a)(30)(A).
Further, the overall requirement in
section 1902(a) for a State plan, and the
specific requirement at section
1902(a)(30)(A) for methods and
procedures related to payment, as
implemented by Federal regulations at
42 CFR 430.10 and 42 CFR 447.252(b)
require that the State plan include a
comprehensive description of the
methods and standards used to set
payment rates. Payment methodologies
should be understandable and
auditable. In addition, since the plan is
the basis for Federal financial
participation, it is important that the
plan language be clear and
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
unambiguous. The proposed
methodology does not provide sufficient
information for providers to determine
the payment amount to which they are
entitled.
Additionally, the Medicaid personal
care services benefit does not include
registered nurse services in the
definitions at section 1905(a)(24) of the
Act and Federal regulations at 42 CFR
440.167 and thus such coverage is not
within the scope of ‘‘medical
assistance’’ under sections 1905(a) and
1902(a)(10) of the Act. As CMS had
indicated in the State Medicaid Manual
Part 4, section 4480(C), although
personal care services may be similar to,
or overlap, some services furnished by
home health aides, ‘‘skilled services that
may be performed only by a health
professional are not considered personal
care services.’’ It would not be
consistent with efficiency and economy
for a State to pay higher rates to attract
overqualified individuals (registered
nurses) to provide personal care
services. Registered nurse services may
instead be furnished as a home health
service under 42 CFR 440.70(b)(1), or as
private duty nursing services as defined
at 42 CFR 440.80(a). Furthermore, there
is no provision in Medicaid for payment
for training of personal care providers,
including the ‘‘training and
supervision’’ of the ‘‘qualified staff
licensed by the Department of Mental
Health’’ or supervision visits by a
registered nurse.
For these reasons, and after consulting
with the Secretary as required by
Federal regulations at 42 CFR section
430.15(c)(2), I disapproved this SPA on
June 16, 2006.
Section 1116 of the Act and Federal
regulations at 42 CFR Part 430, establish
Department procedures that provide an
administrative hearing for
reconsideration of a disapproval of a
State plan or plan amendment. CMS is
required to publish a copy of the notice
to a State Medicaid agency that informs
the agency of the time and place of the
hearing, and the issues to be considered.
If we subsequently notify the agency of
additional issues that will be considered
at the hearing, we will also publish that
notice.
Any individual or group that wants to
participate in the hearing as a party
must petition the presiding officer
within 15 days after publication of this
notice, in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or
organization that wants to participate as
amicus curiae must petition the
presiding officer before the hearing
begins in accordance with the
requirements contained at 42 CFR
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56536-56538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15779]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval of New York
State Plan Amendment 05-50
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces an administrative hearing to be held on
December 6, 2006, at 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, Room 38-
110a, to reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove New York State plan
amendment 05-50.
Closing Date: Requests to participate in the hearing as a party
must be received by the presiding officer by October 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scully-Hayes, Presiding
Officer, CMS, Lord Baltimore Drive, Mail Stop LB-23-20, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, telephone: (410) 786-2055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces an administrative
hearing to reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove New York State plan
amendment (SPA) 05-50 which was submitted on September 29, 2005. This
SPA was disapproved on June 23, 2006.
Under SPA 05-50, New York proposed to extend payment provisions for
New York's Indigent Care Program for certain diagnostic and treatment
centers. The amendment was disapproved because it did not comport with
the requirements of section 1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), 1902(a)(30)(A),
and 1905(a) of the Social Security Act (the Act).
At issue on reconsideration is: (1) Whether the proposed payments
under SPA 05-50 would be for services furnished to individuals within
the statutory categories of permissible eligible individuals set forth
in sections 1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the Act; (2) whether the
proposed payments under SPA 05-50 would result in claims for Federal
financial participation that would not be within the scope of medical
assistance which would be inconsistent with sections 1902(a)(4),
1902(a)(10), and 1905(a) of the Act; and (3) whether the State has
demonstrated that the proposed payment rate, which would provide for
payments unrelated to the covered Medicaid services furnished by the
provider, is an efficient and economical method to pay for covered
Medicaid services, consistent with the requirements of section
[[Page 56537]]
1902(a)(30)(A). The basis for these issues was set out in the
disapproval determination and is summarized below.
Section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires that State Medicaid plans
provide for methods of administration that are found by the Secretary
to be necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan.
Section 1902(a)(10) of the Act sets forth mandatory and optional groups
of individuals for whom States may make medical assistance available
under a State plan. Section 1902(a)(10) of the Act must be read in
concert with the definition of medical assistance at section 1905(a),
which includes additional specification of the categories of eligible
individuals. SPA 05-50 would provide for payment for services furnished
to individuals who are not within the listed groups or categories of
individuals for whom medical assistance is authorized under the
statute. Such payment is outside the scope of the definition of medical
assistance. Including in the State plan a provision which would pay for
provider costs that are not within the scope of medical assistance
furnished to eligible individuals is not necessary for the proper and
efficient operation of the plan. It will result in State claims for
Federal financial participation in expenditures as medical assistance,
which are not within the statutory definition of medical assistance.
The requirements of section 1902(a)(10) of the Act, read in concert
with section 1905(a) of the Act, as noted above, define the range of
individuals who must or may be eligible under a State plan, and the
scope of medical assistance that may be made available. These sections
do not provide for payment of provider costs of treating ineligible
individuals, which is the apparent purpose of the Indigent Care
Program.
Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act requires that State plans provide
payment methods for care and services available under the plan that are
consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care. The proposed
Medicaid payment method is determined by the individual diagnostic and
treatment center's level of uncompensated care associated with
uninsured patients and distributed without regard to the volume of
Medicaid activity in the facility. The specific Medicaid reimbursement
methodology applies a Medicaid rate to bad debt and charity care visits
in the facility. This method results in an aggregate Medicaid payment
which clearly is without regard to the provision of covered Medicaid
services to eligible individuals, and cannot be considered an
economical means of paying for such services.
Section 1116 of the Act and Federal regulations at 42 CFR part 430,
establish Department procedures that provide an administrative hearing
for reconsideration of a disapproval of a State plan or plan amendment.
CMS is required to publish a copy of the notice to a State Medicaid
agency that informs the agency of the time and place of the hearing,
and the issues to be considered. If we subsequently notify the agency
of additional issues that will be considered at the hearing, we will
also publish that notice.
Any individual or group that wants to participate in the hearing as
a party must petition the presiding officer within 15 days after
publication of this notice, in accordance with the requirements
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or organization
that wants to participate as amicus curiae must petition the presiding
officer before the hearing begins in accordance with the requirements
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(c). If the hearing is later rescheduled, the
presiding officer will notify all participants.
The notice to New York announcing an administrative hearing to
reconsider the disapproval of its SPA reads as follows:
Mr. Gregor N. Macmillan, Director, Bureau of Medicaid Law, State of
New York, Department of Health, Corning Tower, The Governor Nelson
A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237.
Dear Mr. Macmillan: I am responding to your request for
reconsideration of the decision to disapprove the New York State
plan amendment (SPA) 05-50, which was submitted on September 29,
2005, and disapproved on June 23, 2006.
Under SPA 05-50, New York was proposing to extend payment
provisions for New York's Indigent Care Program for certain
diagnostic and treatment centers. The amendment was disapproved
because it did not comport with the requirements of section
1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), 1902(a)(30)(A), and 1905(a) of the Social
Security Act (the Act).
At issue on reconsideration is: (1) Whether the proposed
payments under SPA 05-050 would be for services furnished to
individuals within the statutory categories of permissible eligible
individuals set forth in sections 1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the
Act; (2) whether the proposed payments under SPA 05-50 would result
in claims for Federal financial participation that would not be
within the scope of medical assistance which would be inconsistent
with sections 1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(10), and 1905(a) of the Act; and
(3) whether the State has demonstrated that the proposed payment
rate, which would provide for payments unrelated to the covered
Medicaid services furnished by the provider, is an efficient and
economical method to pay for covered Medicaid services, consistent
with the requirements of section 1902(a)(30)(A). The basis for these
issues was set out in the disapproval determination and is
summarized below.
Section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires that State Medicaid plans
provide for methods of administration that are found by the
Secretary to be necessary for the proper and efficient operation of
the plan. Section 1902(a)(10) of the Act sets forth mandatory and
optional groups of individuals for whom States may make medical
assistance available under a State plan. Section 1902(a)(10) of the
Act must be read in concert with the definition of medical
assistance at section 1905(a), which includes additional
specification of the categories of eligible individuals. SPA 05-50
would provide for payment for services furnished to individuals who
are not within the listed groups or categories of individuals for
whom medical assistance is authorized under the statute. Such
payment is outside the scope of the definition of medical
assistance. Including in the State plan a provision which would pay
for provider costs that are not within the scope of medical
assistance furnished to eligible individuals is not necessary for
the proper and efficient operation of the plan. It will result in
State claims for Federal financial participation in expenditures as
medical assistance, which are not within the statutory definition of
medical assistance.
The requirements of section 1902(a)(10) of the Act, read in
concert with section 1905(a) of the Act, as noted above, define the
range of individuals who must or may be eligible under a State plan,
and the scope of medical assistance that may be made available.
These sections do not provide for payment of provider costs of
treating ineligible individuals, which is the apparent purpose of
the Indigent Care Program.
Section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act requires that State plans
provide payment methods for care and services available under the
plan that are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of
care. The proposed Medicaid payment method is determined by the
individual diagnostic and treatment center's level of uncompensated
care associated with uninsured patients and distributed without
regard to the volume of Medicaid activity in the facility. The
specific Medicaid reimbursement methodology applies a Medicaid rate
to bad debt and charity care visits in the facility. This method
results in an aggregate Medicaid payment which clearly is without
regard to the provision of covered Medicaid services to eligible
individuals, and cannot be considered an economical means of paying
for such services. For the reasons cited above, and after
consultation with the Secretary, as required by Federal regulations
at 42 CFR 430.15(c)(2), New York 05-50 was disapproved on June 23,
2006.
I am scheduling a hearing on your request for reconsideration to
be held on December 6, 2006, at 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY
10278, Room 38-110a, to reconsider the decision to disapprove SPA
05-50. If this date is not acceptable, we would be glad to set
another date that is mutually agreeable to
[[Page 56538]]
the parties. The hearing will be governed by the procedures
prescribed at 42 CFR part 430.
I am designating Ms. Kathleen Scully-Hayes as the presiding
officer. If these arrangements present any problems, please contact
the presiding officer at (410) 786-2055. In order to facilitate any
communication which may be necessary between the parties to the
hearing, please notify the presiding officer to indicate
acceptability of the hearing date that has been scheduled and
provide names of the individuals who will represent the State at the
hearing.
Sincerely,
Mark B. McClellan, M.D., PhD.
(Section 1116 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. section 1316);
42 CFR section 430.18)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program No. 13.714, Medicaid
Assistance Program.)
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E6-15779 Filed 9-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P