National Environmental Policy Act; Constellation Program, 56183-56186 [E6-15766]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices
New Mexico, which are currently used
for the fabrication of the fuel for the
GPHS modules. The advanced RPS
assembly and testing would likely be
performed at Idaho National Laboratory,
west of Idaho Falls, Idaho. Any required
additional safety testing (using a nonradioactive fuel substitute to simulate
the mechanical properties of the
plutonium dioxide fuel) of an advanced
RPS could be performed at one or more
of several existing facilities; including
DOE facilities such as LANL and Sandia
National Laboratory (SNL) in
Albuquerque, New Mexico, or U.S.
Army facilities at Aberdeen Proving
Ground (APG) in Aberdeen, Maryland.
Currently, DOE is considering plans to
consolidate operations for the domestic
production of plutonium at its INL
facility; the NEPA process for this action
is on-going (70 FR 38132). NASA holds
no stake in the decision ultimately taken
by DOE related to consolidation of its
long-term production of plutonium-238.
NASA’s Proposed Action or
implementation of the No Action
Alternative is independent of the DOE
decision that will be made by DOE after
its NEPA process is completed.
Activities not requiring the use of
radioisotopes and associated with the
development, testing, and verification of
the power conversion systems could be
performed at several existing facilities
including NASA facilities (such as the
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field,
Cleveland, Ohio and the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, California) and
several commercial facilities (Pratt &
Whitney Rocketdyne, Canoga Park,
California; Teledyne Energy Systems,
Hunt Valley, Maryland; and Lockheed
Martin Space Systems Company,
Denver, Colorado, and King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania).
The only alternative to the Proposed
Action considered in detail, the No
Action Alternative, is to discontinue
MMRTG and SRG development efforts.
NASA would continue to consider the
use of available RPSs, such as the
GPHS–RTG, for future solar system
exploration missions. While well suited
to use in space, the GPHS–RTG would
have substantially limited application
on missions to the surface of solar
system bodies where an atmosphere is
present. In addition, DOE’s GPHS–RTG
production line is no longer operative,
including the Silicon/Germanium
thermocouple manufacturing
operations. It may be possible to
construct a limited number of GPHS–
RTGs (one or two) from existing parts
inventories, but longer term reliance on
this technology would require the
reactivation of these production
capabilities, including reestablishing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Sep 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
vendors for GPHS–RTG components,
which could involve a substantial
financial investment.
The principal near and mid-term
activities associated with the Proposed
Action and potential environmental
impacts include: development of 100
We capable MMRTG and SRG units and
demonstration of performance in flight
qualified, fueled systems. Development
of these systems requires component
and integrated systems testing of
unfueled units, acquisition of
plutonium dioxide, fabrication of fuel,
assembly of fueled test RPSs and safety
and acceptance testing of that fueled
RPS. Impacts from similar past activities
associated with the GPHS–RTG used for
the Galileo, Ulysses, Cassini, and New
Horizons mission to Pluto are well
understood and have been documented
in past NEPA documents. Potential
environmental impacts associated with
development of the flight-qualified
MMRTG and the SRG would be similar
to those associated with the GPHS–RTG
and are expected to be within the
envelope of previously-prepared DOE
NEPA documentation for the facilities
that are involved in this effort.
NASA’s ongoing long-term R&D
activities for alternative power systems
and advanced power conversion
technologies are small-scale, laboratory
activities. No radioisotopes are involved
and only small quantities of hazardous
materials might be involved. The
potential for impacts on worker health,
public health, and the environment
from these R&D activities is small.
Actual use of an MMRTG or SRG on
a specific spacecraft proposed for
launch from any U.S. launch site (e.g.,
Kennedy Space Center /Cape Canaveral
Air Force Station, Vandenberg Air Force
Station) would be subject to missionspecific NEPA documentation. Potential
integrated system development (i.e., full
system development requiring the
integration of the RPS converter with a
radioisotope fuel source) and
production of any new generation of
space-qualified RPSs (beyond the
MMRTG and SRG) that result from the
related long-term R&D technologies
(e.g., more efficient systems or systems
producing smaller electrical power
output), are beyond the scope of this
FPEIS, and would be subject to separate
NEPA documentation.
The FPEIS may be examined at the
following NASA locations by contacting
the pertinent Freedom of Information
Act Office:
(a) NASA, Ames Research Center,
Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650–604–
3273).
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56183
(b) NASA, Dryden Flight Research
Center, P.O. Box 273, Edwards, CA
93523 (661–276–2704).
(c) NASA, Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD
20771 (301–286–4721).
(d) NASA, Johnson Space Center,
Houston, TX 77058 (281–483–8612).
(e) NASA, Kennedy Space Center, FL
32899 (321–867–9280).
(f) NASA, Langley Research Center,
Hampton, VA 23681 (757–864–2497).
(g) NASA, Marshall Space Flight
Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 (256–544–
1837).
(h) NASA, Stennis Space Center, MS
39529 (228–688–2118).
NASA formally released the Draft
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (DPEIS) for the Development
of Advanced Radioisotope Power
Systems for public review via
publication of the EPA NOA in the
Federal Register on January 6, 2006 (71
FR 928) and NASA’s NOA in the
Federal Register on January 5, 2006 (71
FR 625). The DPEIS was distributed in
hardcopy and also made available
electronically via the Worldwide Web at
the address noted in the NASA NOA of
the DPEIS. The DPEIS was made
available to interested agencies,
organizations, and individuals for
review and comment. NASA received
52 written comment submissions, both
in hard copy and electronic form,
during the comment period ending on
February 21, 2006. The comments are
addressed in the FPEIS.
Any person, organization, or
governmental body or agency interested
in receiving a hard copy of NASA’s ROD
after it is rendered should so indicate by
mail or electronic mail to Mr. Lavery at
the addresses provided above.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure
and Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–15764 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06–074)]
National Environmental Policy Act;
Constellation Program
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and to conduct scoping
for the Constellation Program.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
56184
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices
amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), NASA’s NEPA
policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216, subpart 1216.3), and Executive
Order 12114, NASA intends to prepare
a Programmatic EIS for the
implementation of the Constellation
Program. The Constellation Program
encompasses NASA’s initial efforts to
extend a human presence throughout
the Solar System as President George W.
Bush outlined in his Vision for Space
Exploration. Major elements of the
Constellation Program are currently
focused on providing the capability to
transport humans and cargo first to the
International Space Station (ISS), and
then at a later date to the Moon in
support of lunar exploration missions.
These activities would provide the
framework for future human exploration
of the Moon, Mars and other
destinations in the Solar System in the
decades to come.
The design, development, test, and
production of the vehicles needed to
transport humans and cargo, the design
and development of the infrastructure
necessary to support their use in
missions, and the early mission
applications of these vehicles form the
basis of the Proposed Action and
alternatives to be analyzed in the
Constellation Programmatic EIS. The No
Action Alternative is to not implement
the Constellation Program. Present plans
call for operational missions to the ISS
no later than 2014 and human missions
to the Moon no later than 2020.
Launches are proposed to take place
from John F. Kennedy Space Center
(KSC), Florida. Analysis of potential
landing areas for returning spacecraft is
at a very early stage.
NASA will hold public scoping
meetings as part of the NEPA process
associated with development of the
Programmatic EIS. Public meeting
locations and dates identified at this
time are provided under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit comments on environmental
issues and concerns, preferably in
writing, on or before November 13,
2006, to assure full consideration during
the scoping process.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by
mail should be addressed to ZA/
Environmental Manager, Constellation
Program, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson
Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77058. Comments may
be submitted via e-mail to nasacxeis@mail.nasa.gov. Comments may
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Sep 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
also be submitted via telephone at (toll
free) 1–866–662–7243.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constellation Programmatic EIS by email addressed to nasacxeis@mail.nasa.gov, by telephone at
(toll free) 1–866–662–7243, or by mail
addressed to ZA/Environmental
Manager, Constellation Program, NASA
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2101
NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058.
Additional Constellation Program
information may also be found on the
internet at NASA Web sites including
https://www.nasa.gov/constellation.
Information specific to the Constellation
Program NEPA process may be found at
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/
exploration/main/eis.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 14, 2004, President George W.
Bush announced a new Vision for Space
Exploration setting the long-term goals
and objectives for the Nation’s space
exploration efforts. The underlying
objective of the President’s vision is to
advance the Nation’s scientific, security,
and economic interests through a robust
space exploration program. The
President identified three goals as
needed to meet this objective. First, the
Nation will fulfill its obligation to
support the ISS. Secondly, a new
spacecraft capable of transporting
humans, the Crew Exploration Vehicle
(CEV) (recently named ‘‘Orion’’ by
NASA), will be developed, tested, and
deployed. Finally, the Nation will
undertake a human mission to the Moon
by 2020.
The President tasked NASA as the
lead agency in developing the plans,
programs, and activities required to
implement the Vision for Space
Exploration. To achieve these goals,
NASA intends to pursue the following
initiatives:
—Implement a sustained and affordable
human and robotic program to
explore the Moon, Mars, and other
destinations in the Solar System,
—Extend a human presence across the
Solar System, starting with a return of
humans to the Moon by 2020 in
preparation for human exploration of
Mars and other Solar System
destinations,
—Develop innovative technologies,
knowledge, and infrastructures both
to explore and to support decisions
about the destinations for human
exploration, and
—Promote international and
commercial participation in this new
space exploration program.
NASA has formulated a
comprehensive program directed at
accomplishing the key actions in
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pursuit of human exploration activities,
the Constellation Program. The
proposed framework for implementation
of the Constellation Program has been
established through studies addressed
in NASA’s Exploration Systems
Architecture Study (ESAS) released in
November of 2005. The ESAS identified
the key technologies required to enable
NASA to continue to support the ISS, to
undertake human exploration missions
to the Moon, and to prepare for human
missions to Mars and ultimately to other
destinations in the Solar System. The
ESAS also outlined the specific actions
NASA proposes to take in implementing
the President’s Vision for Space
Exploration.
The ESAS recommended the
development of two Space Shuttlederived launch vehicles capable of
supporting Orion operations to the ISS,
the Moon, and Mars. The Proposed
Action would use a Space Shuttlederived set of launch vehicles. The first
of these vehicles, the Crew Launch
Vehicle (recently designated by NASA
as ‘‘Ares-I’’) would carry human
explorers and/or cargo aboard Orion to
low-Earth orbit. Ares-I would be a twostage rocket configuration topped by the
Orion: The first stage would be a
modified version of a Space Shuttle
reusable solid rocket motor, and the
upper stage would use a liquid oxygen/
liquid hydrogen fueled engine derived
from the upper stage engine used on the
Saturn V during the Apollo Program.
Orion would consist of an Apollo-like
capsule which includes a crew module,
a service module, and a launch abort
system. Orion launched aboard the
Ares-I would be able to dock with the
ISS. Orion would also be able to dock
with the cargo launched aboard the
second vehicle, the Cargo Launch
Vehicle (recently designated as ‘‘AresV’’ by NASA). Ares-V would also be a
two-stage rocket configuration. The first
stage would consist of two of the solid
rocket motors used on Ares-I and a
single core liquid propulsion stage. The
core propulsion stage would consist of
a central booster tank, derived from the
Space Shuttle external tank, which
provides fuel for five liquid oxygen/
liquid hydrogen fueled engines. The
upper stage, called the Earth Departure
Stage, would be powered by the same
engine used on the upper stage of the
Ares-I and would provide the capability
to propel a human mission from Earth
orbit to the Moon and later to Mars.
Ares-V would be capable of delivering
large-scale hardware and materials to
Earth orbit. Items delivered could range
from materials for establishing a
permanent Moon base to food, fresh
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices
water, and other staples needed to
extend a human presence beyond Earth
orbit. It is the development and testing
of these vehicles, the infrastructure
necessary to support their use in
missions, and the early mission
applications of these vehicles that form
the basis of the Proposed Action. More
complete descriptions of the planned
Orion, Ares-I, and Ares-V are available
via the internet at https://www.nasa.gov/
mission_pages/exploration/spacecraft/
index.html.
As the Proposed Action to accomplish
the President’s Vision for Space
Exploration, NASA proposes to
continue planning for and to implement
major elements of the Constellation
Program focused on providing for
transport of humans and cargo first to
the ISS and then at a later date to the
Moon in support of lunar exploration
missions. These activities would also
provide the framework for future human
exploration of Mars and other
destinations in the Solar System in the
decades to come.
NASA’s Proposed Action would
consist of six major projects: Project
Orion, Launch Vehicle (i.e., Ares-I and
Ares-V) Projects, Ground Operations
Project, Mission Operations Project,
Extravehicular Vehicle Activity (EVA)
Project, and Advanced Projects. For
Project Orion this Programmatic EIS
will focus on production, flight testing,
and mission operation of Orion. For the
Launch Vehicle Projects, the focus will
be on design, development, production,
testing (including flight tests), and
mission operations of the new Ares-I
and Ares-V launch vehicles. The
Ground Operations Project discussion
will focus on launch processing and
launch operations for each of the two
launch vehicles including potential
launch site modifications and new
construction associated with launch site
modifications at KSC, recovery of Orion
and her crew after missions. The
Missions Operations Project discussion
will focus on the infrastructure
necessary to accomplish missions:
astronaut and flight controller training
facilities, control centers, and
communication centers. The EVA
Project discussion will focus on the
development of spacesuits and EVA
related tools and equipment. The
Advanced Projects discussion will focus
on the requirements and early design of
future Constellation program systems.
These systems would support lunar
landers and surface applications as well
as Mars transportation, landers, and
surface operations. The EVA Project and
Advanced Projects are at a very early
stage of planning and development. As
a result they will be discussed only
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Sep 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
generally in this Programmatic EIS, and
NASA will consider the need for
additional NEPA documentation as such
systems are considered for
implementation and more specific
information becomes available.
Orion and Ares-I would be used on
missions to support the ISS once the
Space Shuttle has been retired. It is
anticipated that they would be used to
ferry human and cargo to the ISS no
later than 2014 with missions
continuing throughout the life of the
ISS. Orion, Ares-I, and Ares-V would be
used for lunar missions to be
undertaken no later than 2020. The
Programmatic EIS will address only the
ISS support missions and early human
lunar missions through the early 2020s.
While additional human missions to the
Moon and, later, to Mars are envisioned
for the Constellation Program, the
nature and scope of these missions and
resources needed to support them are
speculative at this time. NASA
anticipates that tiered NEPA
documentation may need to be prepared
for specific activities and specific
missions as planning matures.
To satisfy the objective that Ares-I and
Orion be able to support ISS no later
than 2014, a limited number of long
lead-time activities that could affect the
environment need to be initiated before
it is likely that the Constellation
Programmatic EIS process will be
completed. Such activities have been or
will be the subject of separate NEPA
documentation before final decisions
are reached as to whether to proceed
with them. These include a Finding of
No Significant Impact for the
Development of the Crew Exploration
Vehicle signed on August 29, 2006
(published in the Federal Register on
September 1, 2006 (71 FR 52169)), the
proposed NASA Launch Abort System
Test Program, and proposed limited
new construction and modification to
existing facilities to support early
testing of Ares-I and Orion at KSC.
The Constellation Program is a large
endeavor that would require NASA to
make use of personnel and resources at
several NASA locations. Under NASA’s
Proposed Action, Constellation Program
activities would be expected to occur at
the following NASA sites:
—Ames Research Center; Santa Clara
County, California,
—Dryden Flight Research Center;
Edwards Air Force Base, California,
—Glenn Research Center; Cleveland,
Ohio,
—Goddard Space Flight Center;
Greenbelt, Maryland,
—Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Pasadena,
California,
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56185
—Johnson Space Center; Houston,
Texas,
—Kennedy Space Center; Brevard
County, Florida,
—Langley Research Center; Hampton,
Virginia,
—Marshall Space Flight Center;
Huntsville, Alabama,
—Michoud Assembly Facility; New
Orleans, Louisiana,
—Stennis Space Center; Bay St. Louis,
Mississippi, and
—White Sands Test Facility (and the
U.S. Army White Sands Missile
Range), New Mexico.
Development activities would also be
expected to occur at contractor facilities,
including, but not necessarily limited
to, potential rocket motor development,
manufacturing and testing at Pratt &
Whitney Rocketdyne; Canoga Park,
California and ATK Thiokol, Brigham
City, Utah.
Alternatives to be considered in this
Programmatic EIS will include, but not
necessarily be limited to other launch
vehicle systems, other means to support
the ISS, alternative Orion landing
regimes and sites, and the No Action
Alternative (i.e., NASA would not
implement the Constellation Program).
NASA anticipates that the areas of
potential environmental impact of most
interest to the public would be: air
quality; water quality; plant and animal
life (including endangered species);
noise and vibration related to, but not
limited to, launch vehicle production,
engine and motor tests, launch tests,
and mission launches; potential impacts
on cultural and historical resources at
the involved NASA facilities;
socioeconomic impacts associated with
the potential increase and decrease of
the workforce at various locations
throughout the country; and sonic
booms and other impacts associated
with the return of Orion to Earth.
NASA also plans on holding a series
of public meetings to provide
information on the Constellation
Programmatic EIS and to solicit public
comments. The meetings that have been
scheduled to date are:
—October 18, 2006, 1 p.m. and 6 p.m.
at the Florida Solar Energy Center
(1679 Clearlake Road, Cocoa,
Florida—University of Central
Florida).
—October 20, 2006, 1 p.m. in the
Everglades/Yellowstone Rooms at the
Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol
Hill (400 New Jersey Avenue, NW.,
Washington DC).
—October 24, 2006, 6 p.m. at the Little
America Hotel (500 South Main
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah).
The Programmatic EIS will analyze
the potential environmental impacts
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
56186
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices
associated with landing Orion at a
general open ocean or terrestrial site in
the Western continental U.S. However,
at this time NASA is still conducting
early technical analyses of the relative
feasibility and desirability of returning
Orion to Earth in the open ocean or at
terrestrial landing sites in the Western
continental U.S. As a result, the number
of potential landing sites is so large that
it is not practical to address specific
sites during the present scoping period.
However, NASA welcomes any public
comments or concerns related to
potential environmental impacts of
ocean landings or landings in the
Western continental U.S. At such time
as the technical analyses of landing
alternatives become more mature,
NASA may reopen the public scoping
period as it relates to landing sites.
Alternatively, if such results are not
available during the Programmatic EIS
process, NASA will prepare tiered
NEPA documentation that will involve
a public scoping process.
Written public input on alternatives
and environmental issues and concerns
associated with the Constellation
Program that should be addressed in the
Programmatic EIS are hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure
and Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–15766 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NASA Case No. LAR–17149–1:
Mechanically Strong, Thermally
Stable, and Electrically Conductive
Nanocomposite Structure and Method
of Fabricating Same; NASA Case No.
LAR–17073–1: Tunable Optical
Assembly With Vibration Dampening;
NASA Case No. LAR–16571–2: Magnetic
Field Response Sensor for Conductive
Media;
NASA Case No. LAR–17154–1: Sol-Gel
Based Oxidation Catalyst and Coating
System Using Same;
NASA Case No. LAR–16736–1: SelfContained Avionics Sensing and
Flight Control System for Small
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle;
NASA Case No. LAR–17163–1:
Positioning System for Single or
Multi-Axis Sensitive Instrument
Calibration and Calibration System for
Use Therewith.
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E6–15681 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06–068)]
Government-Owned Inventions,
Available for Licensing
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
inventions for licensing.
AGENCY:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06–073)]
Government-Owned Inventions
Available for Licensing
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
inventions for licensing.
AGENCY:
The inventions listed below
assigned to the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, have been
filed in the United States Patent and
Trademark office, and are available for
licensing.
DATES: September 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel,
Langley Research Center, Mail Code
141, Hampton, VA 23681–2199;
telephone (757) 864–9260; fax (757)
864–9190.
NASA Case No. LAR–17151–1: Thin
Metal Film System to Include Flexible
Substrate And Method of Making
Same;
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Sep 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: The inventions listed below
assigned to the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, have been
filed in the United States Patent and
Trademark office, and are available for
licensing.
DATES: September 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward K. Fein, Patent Counsel,
Johnson Space Center, Mail Code AL,
Houston, TX 77058–8452; telephone
(281) 483–4871; fax (281) 483–6936.
NASA Case No. MSC–24042–1:
Integrator Circuitry for Single Channel
Radiation Detector;
NASA Case No. MSC–24228–1:
Processing Circuitry for Single
Channel Radiation Detector;
NASA Case No. MSC–22939–2:
Externally Triggered Microcapsules.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E6–15683 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06–069)]
Government-Owned Inventions
Available for Licensing
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
inventions for licensing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The inventions listed below
are assigned to the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, are the
subject of a patent application that has
been filed in the United States Patent
and Trademark office, and are available
for licensing.
DATES: September 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark W. Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA
Management Office—JPL, 4800 Oak
Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180–200,
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818)
354–7770.
NASA Case No. NPO–41757–1: A
Readout Scheme for Squid High
Resolution Thermometry;
NASA Case No. NPO–42312–1: Slow
Light in Chains of Vertically Coupled
Whispering Gallery Mode Resonators;
NASA Case No. NPO–42188–1: WGM
Resonators for Studying Orbital
Angular Momentum of a Photon, and
Methods;
NASA Case No. DRC–006–002:
Improved RAM Booster.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E6–15684 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06–070)]
Government-Owned Inventions,
Available for Licensing
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
inventions for licensing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The inventions listed below
assigned to the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, have been
filed in the United States Patent and
Trademark office, and are available for
licensing.
DATES: September 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Walker, Patent Counsel, Goddard
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56183-56186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15766]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (06-074)]
National Environmental Policy Act; Constellation Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and to conduct scoping for the Constellation Program.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
[[Page 56184]]
amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA
(40 CFR parts 1500-1508), NASA's NEPA policy and procedures (14 CFR
part 1216, subpart 1216.3), and Executive Order 12114, NASA intends to
prepare a Programmatic EIS for the implementation of the Constellation
Program. The Constellation Program encompasses NASA's initial efforts
to extend a human presence throughout the Solar System as President
George W. Bush outlined in his Vision for Space Exploration. Major
elements of the Constellation Program are currently focused on
providing the capability to transport humans and cargo first to the
International Space Station (ISS), and then at a later date to the Moon
in support of lunar exploration missions. These activities would
provide the framework for future human exploration of the Moon, Mars
and other destinations in the Solar System in the decades to come.
The design, development, test, and production of the vehicles
needed to transport humans and cargo, the design and development of the
infrastructure necessary to support their use in missions, and the
early mission applications of these vehicles form the basis of the
Proposed Action and alternatives to be analyzed in the Constellation
Programmatic EIS. The No Action Alternative is to not implement the
Constellation Program. Present plans call for operational missions to
the ISS no later than 2014 and human missions to the Moon no later than
2020. Launches are proposed to take place from John F. Kennedy Space
Center (KSC), Florida. Analysis of potential landing areas for
returning spacecraft is at a very early stage.
NASA will hold public scoping meetings as part of the NEPA process
associated with development of the Programmatic EIS. Public meeting
locations and dates identified at this time are provided under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit comments on
environmental issues and concerns, preferably in writing, on or before
November 13, 2006, to assure full consideration during the scoping
process.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by mail should be addressed to ZA/
Environmental Manager, Constellation Program, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson
Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058. Comments may be
submitted via e-mail to nasa-cxeis@mail.nasa.gov. Comments may also be
submitted via telephone at (toll free) 1-866-662-7243.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constellation Programmatic EIS by e-
mail addressed to nasa-cxeis@mail.nasa.gov, by telephone at (toll free)
1-866-662-7243, or by mail addressed to ZA/Environmental Manager,
Constellation Program, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA
Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058. Additional Constellation Program
information may also be found on the internet at NASA Web sites
including https://www.nasa.gov/constellation. Information specific to
the Constellation Program NEPA process may be found at https://
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/main/eis.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 14, 2004, President George W.
Bush announced a new Vision for Space Exploration setting the long-term
goals and objectives for the Nation's space exploration efforts. The
underlying objective of the President's vision is to advance the
Nation's scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust
space exploration program. The President identified three goals as
needed to meet this objective. First, the Nation will fulfill its
obligation to support the ISS. Secondly, a new spacecraft capable of
transporting humans, the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) (recently named
``Orion'' by NASA), will be developed, tested, and deployed. Finally,
the Nation will undertake a human mission to the Moon by 2020.
The President tasked NASA as the lead agency in developing the
plans, programs, and activities required to implement the Vision for
Space Exploration. To achieve these goals, NASA intends to pursue the
following initiatives:
--Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program to
explore the Moon, Mars, and other destinations in the Solar System,
--Extend a human presence across the Solar System, starting with a
return of humans to the Moon by 2020 in preparation for human
exploration of Mars and other Solar System destinations,
--Develop innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both
to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human
exploration, and
--Promote international and commercial participation in this new space
exploration program.
NASA has formulated a comprehensive program directed at
accomplishing the key actions in pursuit of human exploration
activities, the Constellation Program. The proposed framework for
implementation of the Constellation Program has been established
through studies addressed in NASA's Exploration Systems Architecture
Study (ESAS) released in November of 2005. The ESAS identified the key
technologies required to enable NASA to continue to support the ISS, to
undertake human exploration missions to the Moon, and to prepare for
human missions to Mars and ultimately to other destinations in the
Solar System. The ESAS also outlined the specific actions NASA proposes
to take in implementing the President's Vision for Space Exploration.
The ESAS recommended the development of two Space Shuttle-derived
launch vehicles capable of supporting Orion operations to the ISS, the
Moon, and Mars. The Proposed Action would use a Space Shuttle-derived
set of launch vehicles. The first of these vehicles, the Crew Launch
Vehicle (recently designated by NASA as ``Ares-I'') would carry human
explorers and/or cargo aboard Orion to low-Earth orbit. Ares-I would be
a two-stage rocket configuration topped by the Orion: The first stage
would be a modified version of a Space Shuttle reusable solid rocket
motor, and the upper stage would use a liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen
fueled engine derived from the upper stage engine used on the Saturn V
during the Apollo Program. Orion would consist of an Apollo-like
capsule which includes a crew module, a service module, and a launch
abort system. Orion launched aboard the Ares-I would be able to dock
with the ISS. Orion would also be able to dock with the cargo launched
aboard the second vehicle, the Cargo Launch Vehicle (recently
designated as ``Ares-V'' by NASA). Ares-V would also be a two-stage
rocket configuration. The first stage would consist of two of the solid
rocket motors used on Ares-I and a single core liquid propulsion stage.
The core propulsion stage would consist of a central booster tank,
derived from the Space Shuttle external tank, which provides fuel for
five liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen fueled engines. The upper stage,
called the Earth Departure Stage, would be powered by the same engine
used on the upper stage of the Ares-I and would provide the capability
to propel a human mission from Earth orbit to the Moon and later to
Mars. Ares-V would be capable of delivering large-scale hardware and
materials to Earth orbit. Items delivered could range from materials
for establishing a permanent Moon base to food, fresh
[[Page 56185]]
water, and other staples needed to extend a human presence beyond Earth
orbit. It is the development and testing of these vehicles, the
infrastructure necessary to support their use in missions, and the
early mission applications of these vehicles that form the basis of the
Proposed Action. More complete descriptions of the planned Orion, Ares-
I, and Ares-V are available via the internet at https://www.nasa.gov/
mission_pages/exploration/spacecraft/.
As the Proposed Action to accomplish the President's Vision for
Space Exploration, NASA proposes to continue planning for and to
implement major elements of the Constellation Program focused on
providing for transport of humans and cargo first to the ISS and then
at a later date to the Moon in support of lunar exploration missions.
These activities would also provide the framework for future human
exploration of Mars and other destinations in the Solar System in the
decades to come.
NASA's Proposed Action would consist of six major projects: Project
Orion, Launch Vehicle (i.e., Ares-I and Ares-V) Projects, Ground
Operations Project, Mission Operations Project, Extravehicular Vehicle
Activity (EVA) Project, and Advanced Projects. For Project Orion this
Programmatic EIS will focus on production, flight testing, and mission
operation of Orion. For the Launch Vehicle Projects, the focus will be
on design, development, production, testing (including flight tests),
and mission operations of the new Ares-I and Ares-V launch vehicles.
The Ground Operations Project discussion will focus on launch
processing and launch operations for each of the two launch vehicles
including potential launch site modifications and new construction
associated with launch site modifications at KSC, recovery of Orion and
her crew after missions. The Missions Operations Project discussion
will focus on the infrastructure necessary to accomplish missions:
astronaut and flight controller training facilities, control centers,
and communication centers. The EVA Project discussion will focus on the
development of spacesuits and EVA related tools and equipment. The
Advanced Projects discussion will focus on the requirements and early
design of future Constellation program systems. These systems would
support lunar landers and surface applications as well as Mars
transportation, landers, and surface operations. The EVA Project and
Advanced Projects are at a very early stage of planning and
development. As a result they will be discussed only generally in this
Programmatic EIS, and NASA will consider the need for additional NEPA
documentation as such systems are considered for implementation and
more specific information becomes available.
Orion and Ares-I would be used on missions to support the ISS once
the Space Shuttle has been retired. It is anticipated that they would
be used to ferry human and cargo to the ISS no later than 2014 with
missions continuing throughout the life of the ISS. Orion, Ares-I, and
Ares-V would be used for lunar missions to be undertaken no later than
2020. The Programmatic EIS will address only the ISS support missions
and early human lunar missions through the early 2020s. While
additional human missions to the Moon and, later, to Mars are
envisioned for the Constellation Program, the nature and scope of these
missions and resources needed to support them are speculative at this
time. NASA anticipates that tiered NEPA documentation may need to be
prepared for specific activities and specific missions as planning
matures.
To satisfy the objective that Ares-I and Orion be able to support
ISS no later than 2014, a limited number of long lead-time activities
that could affect the environment need to be initiated before it is
likely that the Constellation Programmatic EIS process will be
completed. Such activities have been or will be the subject of separate
NEPA documentation before final decisions are reached as to whether to
proceed with them. These include a Finding of No Significant Impact for
the Development of the Crew Exploration Vehicle signed on August 29,
2006 (published in the Federal Register on September 1, 2006 (71 FR
52169)), the proposed NASA Launch Abort System Test Program, and
proposed limited new construction and modification to existing
facilities to support early testing of Ares-I and Orion at KSC.
The Constellation Program is a large endeavor that would require
NASA to make use of personnel and resources at several NASA locations.
Under NASA's Proposed Action, Constellation Program activities would be
expected to occur at the following NASA sites:
--Ames Research Center; Santa Clara County, California,
--Dryden Flight Research Center; Edwards Air Force Base, California,
--Glenn Research Center; Cleveland, Ohio,
--Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt, Maryland,
--Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Pasadena, California,
--Johnson Space Center; Houston, Texas,
--Kennedy Space Center; Brevard County, Florida,
--Langley Research Center; Hampton, Virginia,
--Marshall Space Flight Center; Huntsville, Alabama,
--Michoud Assembly Facility; New Orleans, Louisiana,
--Stennis Space Center; Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, and
--White Sands Test Facility (and the U.S. Army White Sands Missile
Range), New Mexico.
Development activities would also be expected to occur at
contractor facilities, including, but not necessarily limited to,
potential rocket motor development, manufacturing and testing at Pratt
& Whitney Rocketdyne; Canoga Park, California and ATK Thiokol, Brigham
City, Utah.
Alternatives to be considered in this Programmatic EIS will
include, but not necessarily be limited to other launch vehicle
systems, other means to support the ISS, alternative Orion landing
regimes and sites, and the No Action Alternative (i.e., NASA would not
implement the Constellation Program).
NASA anticipates that the areas of potential environmental impact
of most interest to the public would be: air quality; water quality;
plant and animal life (including endangered species); noise and
vibration related to, but not limited to, launch vehicle production,
engine and motor tests, launch tests, and mission launches; potential
impacts on cultural and historical resources at the involved NASA
facilities; socioeconomic impacts associated with the potential
increase and decrease of the workforce at various locations throughout
the country; and sonic booms and other impacts associated with the
return of Orion to Earth.
NASA also plans on holding a series of public meetings to provide
information on the Constellation Programmatic EIS and to solicit public
comments. The meetings that have been scheduled to date are:
--October 18, 2006, 1 p.m. and 6 p.m. at the Florida Solar Energy
Center (1679 Clearlake Road, Cocoa, Florida--University of Central
Florida).
--October 20, 2006, 1 p.m. in the Everglades/Yellowstone Rooms at the
Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill (400 New Jersey Avenue, NW.,
Washington DC).
--October 24, 2006, 6 p.m. at the Little America Hotel (500 South Main
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah).
The Programmatic EIS will analyze the potential environmental
impacts
[[Page 56186]]
associated with landing Orion at a general open ocean or terrestrial
site in the Western continental U.S. However, at this time NASA is
still conducting early technical analyses of the relative feasibility
and desirability of returning Orion to Earth in the open ocean or at
terrestrial landing sites in the Western continental U.S. As a result,
the number of potential landing sites is so large that it is not
practical to address specific sites during the present scoping period.
However, NASA welcomes any public comments or concerns related to
potential environmental impacts of ocean landings or landings in the
Western continental U.S. At such time as the technical analyses of
landing alternatives become more mature, NASA may reopen the public
scoping period as it relates to landing sites. Alternatively, if such
results are not available during the Programmatic EIS process, NASA
will prepare tiered NEPA documentation that will involve a public
scoping process.
Written public input on alternatives and environmental issues and
concerns associated with the Constellation Program that should be
addressed in the Programmatic EIS are hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure and Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-15766 Filed 9-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P