Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 56217 [E6-15752]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 26, 2006 / Notices
Petition Docket Number FRA–2006–
25452) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401,
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. Communications received
within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78), or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on September
20, 2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–15753 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2006–
25764]
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP)
seeks a waiver of compliance with
certain requirements of 49 CFR,
232.205, Class I Brake Test-Initial
Terminal inspection, published January
17, 2001, and 49 CFR 215—Railroad
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:03 Sep 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Freight Car Safety Standards, published
April 21, 1980, for freight cars received
in interchange from the Ferrocarriles
Nacionales de Mexico Railroad (FXE), at
Calexico, California. Specifically, UP
seeks approval to move the equipment
from the interchange point, at MP 708.5
on the Calexico Subdivision, to the UP
rail yard in El Centro, California (a
distance of 10.1 miles), without
performing the inspections and tests
specified.
According to UP, a Class III brake testtrainline continuity inspection would be
performed per the requirements of 49
CFR 232.211, prior to departing
Calexico, and the equipment would be
inspected to ensure safe movement to El
Centro at a train speed not to exceed 20
mph. Equipment found unsafe for
movement to El Centro for repairs
would be set out of the train at Calexico.
The train would be equipped with a
compliant end-of-train device per 49
CFR 232, Subpart E.
UP currently receives approximately
50 freight cars per day from FXE at the
interchange point in Calexico. The
volume has grown steadily in recent
years and stands to grow even more as
the effects of both the NAFTA and
GATT trade agreements. United States
Customs conduct inspections of the
equipment at Heber, which usually
takes more than an hour. If the
equipment is ‘‘off air’’ for more than 4
hours at Heber, a ‘‘transfer train brake
test’’ per the requirements of 49 CFR
232.215, would be performed prior to
departure. From Heber, the train would
move to El Centro (a distance of 4.6
miles), where a Class I brake test-initial
terminal inspection would be performed
per the requirements of 49 CFR 232.205.
UP states that the capacity of the
existing railroad facility in Calexico is
inadequate to handle current volume
and the waiver is necessary to facilitate
movement and to avoid restricting the
volume of rail cars handled through this
gateway. UP asserts that Calexico is a
‘‘bottleneck’’ that causes delays to
international commerce on both sides of
the border, and granting the requested
waiver, will have no adverse effect on
safety. UP also references current
railroad operations at border crossings
in Brownsville and Laredo, Texas,
where trains move several miles from
the border without performing a Class I
air test.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56217
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (FRA–2006–
25764) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
45 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). The
Statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
20, 2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–15752 Filed 9–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for a Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Sections
211.9 and 211.41, notice is hereby given
that the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) has received a
request for a waiver of compliance with
certain requirements of Federal railroad
safety regulations. The individual
petitions are described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 56217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15752]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2006-25764]
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of 49 CFR, 232.205, Class I Brake Test-
Initial Terminal inspection, published January 17, 2001, and 49 CFR
215--Railroad Freight Car Safety Standards, published April 21, 1980,
for freight cars received in interchange from the Ferrocarriles
Nacionales de Mexico Railroad (FXE), at Calexico, California.
Specifically, UP seeks approval to move the equipment from the
interchange point, at MP 708.5 on the Calexico Subdivision, to the UP
rail yard in El Centro, California (a distance of 10.1 miles), without
performing the inspections and tests specified.
According to UP, a Class III brake test-trainline continuity
inspection would be performed per the requirements of 49 CFR 232.211,
prior to departing Calexico, and the equipment would be inspected to
ensure safe movement to El Centro at a train speed not to exceed 20
mph. Equipment found unsafe for movement to El Centro for repairs would
be set out of the train at Calexico. The train would be equipped with a
compliant end-of-train device per 49 CFR 232, Subpart E.
UP currently receives approximately 50 freight cars per day from
FXE at the interchange point in Calexico. The volume has grown steadily
in recent years and stands to grow even more as the effects of both the
NAFTA and GATT trade agreements. United States Customs conduct
inspections of the equipment at Heber, which usually takes more than an
hour. If the equipment is ``off air'' for more than 4 hours at Heber, a
``transfer train brake test'' per the requirements of 49 CFR 232.215,
would be performed prior to departure. From Heber, the train would move
to El Centro (a distance of 4.6 miles), where a Class I brake test-
initial terminal inspection would be performed per the requirements of
49 CFR 232.205.
UP states that the capacity of the existing railroad facility in
Calexico is inadequate to handle current volume and the waiver is
necessary to facilitate movement and to avoid restricting the volume of
rail cars handled through this gateway. UP asserts that Calexico is a
``bottleneck'' that causes delays to international commerce on both
sides of the border, and granting the requested waiver, will have no
adverse effect on safety. UP also references current railroad
operations at border crossings in Brownsville and Laredo, Texas, where
trains move several miles from the border without performing a Class I
air test.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (FRA-2006-25764) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza
Level), 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Communications
received within 45 days of the date of this notice will be considered
by FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are available for examination during
regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above facility. All
documents in the public docket are also available for inspection and
copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78). The Statement
may also be found at https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 20, 2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E6-15752 Filed 9-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P