National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List Update, 55742-55743 [06-8175]
Download as PDF
55742
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–8222–9]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List Update
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of deletion of the
Nineteenth (19th) Avenue Landfill
Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of
the Nineteenth (19th) Avenue Landfill
Site (Site), located in Phoenix, Maricopa
County, Arizona, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), which EPA promulgated
pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA and the State of Arizona have
determined that the Site poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, no further
remedial measures pursuant to CERCLA
are appropriate.
DATES: Effective Date: September 25,
2006.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadia Hollan, Remedial Project
Manager, Mail Code: SFD–8–2, U.S.
EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, California 94105–3901,
hollan.nadia@epa.gov, (415) 972–3187
OR 1–800–231–3075 (message line), or
William DePaul, Remedial Project
Manager, Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality, 1110 West
Washington Street, Phoenix Arizona,
85007, depaul.william@azdeq.gov, (602)
771–4654.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to
be deleted from the NPL is: Nineteenth
(19th) Avenue Landfill Site, Phoenix,
Maricopa County, Arizona.
A Notice of Intent to Delete for this
Site was published in the Federal
Register on August 14, 2006 (71 FR
46429). The closing date for comments
on the Notice of Intent to Delete was
September 13, 2006. Two written
comments were received; therefore EPA
has prepared a Responsiveness
Summary (See Appendix 1 below). In
addition, EPA received a request from a
community group representative to
extend the public comment period. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Sep 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
is also addressed in the Responsiveness
Summary. EPA has considered all
public comments in its final decision to
delete the Site from the NPL.
EPA identifies sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public
health, welfare, or the environment and
it maintains the NPL as the list of those
sites. Any site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed
remedial actions in the unlikely event
that conditions at the site warrant such
action. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP
states that Fund-financed actions may
be taken at sites deleted from the NPL.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
affect responsible party liability or
impede agency efforts to recover costs
associated with response efforts.
Appendix 1—Responsiveness Summary
The Responsiveness Summary has
been prepared to provide responses to
comments submitted to EPA during the
30-day public comment period
regarding the Notice of Intent to Delete
(71 FR 46429) for the 19th Avenue
Landfill Superfund Site. The original
comments are summarized below and
available at https://www.regulations.gov,
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–
0002, with the support materials under
document type ‘‘public submissions’’,
and at the information repositories at
the following addresses: Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
Records Center, 1110 West Washington
Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85007, (602)
771–4380 or 1 (800) 234–5677, ext. 771–
4380, Hours: M–F 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.;
City of Phoenix Public Library,
Government Documents Section, 1221
North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona
85004, (602) 262–4636, Hours: M–Th 10
a.m.–9 p.m., Fr&Sa 10 a.m.–6 p.m., Su
12 p.m.–6 p.m.; and U.S. EPA
Superfund Records Center, 95
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105, (415) 536–2000,
Hours: M–F 8 a.m.–5 p.m.
Summary of Comment #1, Letter from
Stephen M. Brittle, President, Don’t
Waste Arizona, Inc. (DWAZ): The
majority of the comments are concerns
regarding the impact of the Site to
groundwater contamination. Mr. Brittle
stated that the delisting ‘‘will remove
the appropriate protections that the
Superfund program is supposed to
provide’’. Specifically, there is a
concern that during the landfill cleanup
in the 1990’s barrels of hazardous waste
were left in the landfill and could
ultimately leak, impacting groundwater
in the future. There is also a concern
regarding ‘‘plumes of chemical
contamination moving off the landfill
site’’ and DWAZ believes it has received
conflicting information regarding the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
source of the contamination. It also
appears to the group that EPA has
allowed the plumes to migrate and fall
below action levels rather than taking
appropriate action to clean them up.
Response to Comment #1: The landfill
contains a variety of contaminants
which have the potential to leach into
the groundwater. Since removing all of
the landfill contamination was not
feasible, the EPA and ADEQ selected the
remedy to include leaving the refuse in
place, preventing the landfill from
eroding during flood seasons with
levees and a soil cap, and controlling
the soil gas produced with a landfill gas
collection and treatment system. The
landfill cap also reduces infiltration of
rainwater, which will reduce the
potential for leaching. Also as part of
the remedy, the City of Phoenix is
required to monitor groundwater at the
landfill in perpetuity, and required to
implement a ‘‘groundwater contingency
plan’’ should any constituent due to
landfill contamination exceed action
levels. This plan involves follow-up
sampling to confirm the results, and an
evaluation of remedial alternatives for
groundwater cleanup should the
contamination pose a threat to human
health and the environment. The
deletion does not affect this
requirement, nor does it prevent EPA or
ADEQ from requiring cleanup of
groundwater should there be an impact
in the future. As explained later in this
response, EPA acknowledges that there
are elevated levels of contaminants in
the groundwater at the landfill, however
it has been determined that the landfill
is not a source of this contamination
based on the review of monitoring data
that has been collected quarterly for
almost 20 years.
Regarding the allegations of buried
barrels, a letter was sent to ADEQ in
August 1996, complaining that barrels
were improperly handled. Potentially
hazardous material was drained out of
leaking drums, mixed with surrounding
soil/debris, excavated and stored in rolloff containers, and then re-buried in the
landfill. Therefore, the material was
already taken out of the drums. The
complaint gave rise to the question of
whether the material was hazardous and
whether it was handled appropriately,
and this was investigated by ADEQ and
EPA at the time. The conclusions of the
investigation were provided by EPA to
the complainant in February 1998.
Regarding groundwater contamination
in the area, only three constituents have
ever exceeded action levels on multiple
occasions in the landfill monitoring
well network: 1,1-dichloroethylene (1,1DCE), vinyl chloride, and arsenic. There
is a known plume of 1,1-DCE moving
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
under the landfill, however, EPA and
ADEQ have determined that the 1,1-DCE
plume is from an upgradient source, and
that the 19th Avenue Landfill is not
contributing (Assessment of Upgradient
1,1-DCE for City of Phoenix 19th
Avenue Landfill, Dames & Moore,
November 1998). Vinyl chloride was
detected above the action level in one of
the monitoring wells and was also from
off-site sources unrelated to the landfill.
Vinyl chloride has not been above the
action level since 2002 (19th Avenue
Landfill Exceedence Report for Vinyl
Chloride, URS, June 2002, and Response
to Agency Comments to the June 2002
Report, URS, April 2003). Arsenic has
been detected above action levels in two
of the on-site wells, however arsenic is
below levels of concern outside the
boundaries of the landfill. EPA and
ADEQ determined that the source of the
arsenic is not contamination from the
landfill itself, but native arsenic present
in the soils. The arsenic is being
mobilized into groundwater over a small
area due to the oxygen low conditions
near the landfill. (Exceedence Report for
Arsenic at Monitoring Well I–4, URS,
December 2003, Technical
Memorandum of Arsenic
Concentrations in Groundwater Monitor
Wells, Hugh Rieck, ADEQ, April 2004,
and Exceedence Report for Arsenic at
Monitoring Well I–4, URS, June 2006,
reference arsenic report). Again, if in the
future it is determined that groundwater
is impacted by the landfill, the
protections will remain in place to
compel cleanup. The supporting
information that is referenced above is
available in the deletion docket and site
repositories and can also be provided to
DWAZ.
Summary of Comment #2, Request
from Michael Pops, President,
Concerned Residents of South Phoenix:
Mr. Pops contacted EPA and ADEQ by
telephone with a request to extend the
public comment period. He believed the
community outreach EPA conducted
regarding the notice was inadequate and
requested that EPA and ADEQ conduct
an outreach campaign to fully inform
the affected community of the proposed
action. He also was concerned with
future use of the Site, and that the
community would be unable to provide
input or ensure that redevelopment
plans would be acceptable to the
community.
Response to Comment #2: EPA
decided not to extend the timeframe for
comment on this action beyond the
required 30 days. EPA believes there
was adequate time for the community to
raise significant concerns regarding the
deletion, and that the deletion action
itself will not impact the community’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Sep 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
ability to comment on issues regarding
the Site. EPA had issued a fact sheet to
the Site mailing list and published a
notice in the local paper, The Arizona
Republic. We will work with ADEQ and
the City of Phoenix to update the
Community Involvement Plan and add
other local newspapers and community
groups to the outreach strategy as
suggested for future actions. The public
will continue to have an opportunity to
comment to ADEQ, the lead agency, on
any actions or activities associated with
the Site even after deletion, particularly
during the statutory Five-Year Review
process.
Regarding future development at the
Site, any plans would still need to
follow all the applicable criteria under
CERCLA and the NCP, and be protective
of human health and the environment.
In addition, the City of Phoenix filed a
Declaration of Environmental Use
Restriction on the property title in July
2006, prohibiting residential use and
ensuring a process by which no
landowner will be allowed to interfere
with the remedy.
Summary of Comment #3, Letter from
Karen O’Regan, City of Phoenix,
Environmental Programs: This comment
is in ‘‘support and concurrence’’ with
the deletion action, and an expression of
the commitment the City has to
ensuring the remedy will be maintained
and the groundwater monitored. The
City will work with ADEQ on any
‘‘viable reuse proposals’’.
Response to Comment #3: EPA
appreciates the concurrence, and ongoing commitment to ensure the remedy
will be maintained. EPA encourages the
City to consider community concerns
regarding the Site in the future,
particularly as associated with the
issues expressed by the community
during this public comment period, and
any input that may be provided during
additional community involvement
activities.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55743
PART 300—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended under [Arizona] (‘‘AZ’’) by
removing the entry for the Nineteenth
Avenue Landfill site in Phoenix,
Arizona.
I
[FR Doc. 06–8175 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 4, 30, 31, 32, 52, 68, 71,
91, 107, 108, 109, 126, 147, 150, 153,
159, 160, 164, 176, and 197
49 CFR Part 450
[USCG–2006–25697]
RIN 1625–ZA10
Shipping and Transportation;
Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule makes nonsubstantive changes throughout Titles
46 and 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this rule is
to make conforming amendments and
technical corrections to Coast Guard
navigation and navigable water
regulations. This rule will have no
substantive effect on the regulated
public.
This final rule is effective
September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2006–25697 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this rule, call Mr.
Ray Davis, Coast Guard, telephone 202–
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 185 (Monday, September 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55742-55743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8175]
[[Page 55742]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-8222-9]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of deletion of the Nineteenth (19th) Avenue Landfill
Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces the
deletion of the Nineteenth (19th) Avenue Landfill Site (Site), located
in Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona, from the National Priorities List
(NPL). The NPL is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which
EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended. EPA and the State of Arizona have determined that the
Site poses no significant threat to public health or the environment
and, therefore, no further remedial measures pursuant to CERCLA are
appropriate.
DATES: Effective Date: September 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadia Hollan, Remedial Project
Manager, Mail Code: SFD-8-2, U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105-3901, hollan.nadia@epa.gov, (415) 972-
3187 OR 1-800-231-3075 (message line), or William DePaul, Remedial
Project Manager, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 West
Washington Street, Phoenix Arizona, 85007, depaul.william@azdeq.gov,
(602) 771-4654.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to be deleted from the NPL is:
Nineteenth (19th) Avenue Landfill Site, Phoenix, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
A Notice of Intent to Delete for this Site was published in the
Federal Register on August 14, 2006 (71 FR 46429). The closing date for
comments on the Notice of Intent to Delete was September 13, 2006. Two
written comments were received; therefore EPA has prepared a
Responsiveness Summary (See Appendix 1 below). In addition, EPA
received a request from a community group representative to extend the
public comment period. This is also addressed in the Responsiveness
Summary. EPA has considered all public comments in its final decision
to delete the Site from the NPL.
EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk to
public health, welfare, or the environment and it maintains the NPL as
the list of those sites. Any site deleted from the NPL remains eligible
for Fund-financed remedial actions in the unlikely event that
conditions at the site warrant such action. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that Fund-financed actions may be taken at sites deleted
from the NPL. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not affect
responsible party liability or impede agency efforts to recover costs
associated with response efforts.
Appendix 1--Responsiveness Summary
The Responsiveness Summary has been prepared to provide responses
to comments submitted to EPA during the 30-day public comment period
regarding the Notice of Intent to Delete (71 FR 46429) for the 19th
Avenue Landfill Superfund Site. The original comments are summarized
below and available at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-SFUND-1983-0002, with the support materials under document type
``public submissions'', and at the information repositories at the
following addresses: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Records Center, 1110 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85007,
(602) 771-4380 or 1 (800) 234-5677, ext. 771-4380, Hours: M-F 8:30
a.m.-4:30 p.m.; City of Phoenix Public Library, Government Documents
Section, 1221 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004, (602) 262-
4636, Hours: M-Th 10 a.m.-9 p.m., Fr&Sa 10 a.m.-6 p.m., Su 12 p.m.-6
p.m.; and U.S. EPA Superfund Records Center, 95 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, California 94105, (415) 536-2000, Hours: M-F 8 a.m.-5 p.m.
Summary of Comment #1, Letter from Stephen M. Brittle, President,
Don't Waste Arizona, Inc. (DWAZ): The majority of the comments are
concerns regarding the impact of the Site to groundwater contamination.
Mr. Brittle stated that the delisting ``will remove the appropriate
protections that the Superfund program is supposed to provide''.
Specifically, there is a concern that during the landfill cleanup in
the 1990's barrels of hazardous waste were left in the landfill and
could ultimately leak, impacting groundwater in the future. There is
also a concern regarding ``plumes of chemical contamination moving off
the landfill site'' and DWAZ believes it has received conflicting
information regarding the source of the contamination. It also appears
to the group that EPA has allowed the plumes to migrate and fall below
action levels rather than taking appropriate action to clean them up.
Response to Comment #1: The landfill contains a variety of
contaminants which have the potential to leach into the groundwater.
Since removing all of the landfill contamination was not feasible, the
EPA and ADEQ selected the remedy to include leaving the refuse in
place, preventing the landfill from eroding during flood seasons with
levees and a soil cap, and controlling the soil gas produced with a
landfill gas collection and treatment system. The landfill cap also
reduces infiltration of rainwater, which will reduce the potential for
leaching. Also as part of the remedy, the City of Phoenix is required
to monitor groundwater at the landfill in perpetuity, and required to
implement a ``groundwater contingency plan'' should any constituent due
to landfill contamination exceed action levels. This plan involves
follow-up sampling to confirm the results, and an evaluation of
remedial alternatives for groundwater cleanup should the contamination
pose a threat to human health and the environment. The deletion does
not affect this requirement, nor does it prevent EPA or ADEQ from
requiring cleanup of groundwater should there be an impact in the
future. As explained later in this response, EPA acknowledges that
there are elevated levels of contaminants in the groundwater at the
landfill, however it has been determined that the landfill is not a
source of this contamination based on the review of monitoring data
that has been collected quarterly for almost 20 years.
Regarding the allegations of buried barrels, a letter was sent to
ADEQ in August 1996, complaining that barrels were improperly handled.
Potentially hazardous material was drained out of leaking drums, mixed
with surrounding soil/debris, excavated and stored in roll-off
containers, and then re-buried in the landfill. Therefore, the material
was already taken out of the drums. The complaint gave rise to the
question of whether the material was hazardous and whether it was
handled appropriately, and this was investigated by ADEQ and EPA at the
time. The conclusions of the investigation were provided by EPA to the
complainant in February 1998.
Regarding groundwater contamination in the area, only three
constituents have ever exceeded action levels on multiple occasions in
the landfill monitoring well network: 1,1-dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE),
vinyl chloride, and arsenic. There is a known plume of 1,1-DCE moving
[[Page 55743]]
under the landfill, however, EPA and ADEQ have determined that the 1,1-
DCE plume is from an upgradient source, and that the 19th Avenue
Landfill is not contributing (Assessment of Upgradient 1,1-DCE for City
of Phoenix 19th Avenue Landfill, Dames & Moore, November 1998). Vinyl
chloride was detected above the action level in one of the monitoring
wells and was also from off-site sources unrelated to the landfill.
Vinyl chloride has not been above the action level since 2002 (19th
Avenue Landfill Exceedence Report for Vinyl Chloride, URS, June 2002,
and Response to Agency Comments to the June 2002 Report, URS, April
2003). Arsenic has been detected above action levels in two of the on-
site wells, however arsenic is below levels of concern outside the
boundaries of the landfill. EPA and ADEQ determined that the source of
the arsenic is not contamination from the landfill itself, but native
arsenic present in the soils. The arsenic is being mobilized into
groundwater over a small area due to the oxygen low conditions near the
landfill. (Exceedence Report for Arsenic at Monitoring Well I-4, URS,
December 2003, Technical Memorandum of Arsenic Concentrations in
Groundwater Monitor Wells, Hugh Rieck, ADEQ, April 2004, and Exceedence
Report for Arsenic at Monitoring Well I-4, URS, June 2006, reference
arsenic report). Again, if in the future it is determined that
groundwater is impacted by the landfill, the protections will remain in
place to compel cleanup. The supporting information that is referenced
above is available in the deletion docket and site repositories and can
also be provided to DWAZ.
Summary of Comment #2, Request from Michael Pops, President,
Concerned Residents of South Phoenix: Mr. Pops contacted EPA and ADEQ
by telephone with a request to extend the public comment period. He
believed the community outreach EPA conducted regarding the notice was
inadequate and requested that EPA and ADEQ conduct an outreach campaign
to fully inform the affected community of the proposed action. He also
was concerned with future use of the Site, and that the community would
be unable to provide input or ensure that redevelopment plans would be
acceptable to the community.
Response to Comment #2: EPA decided not to extend the timeframe for
comment on this action beyond the required 30 days. EPA believes there
was adequate time for the community to raise significant concerns
regarding the deletion, and that the deletion action itself will not
impact the community's ability to comment on issues regarding the Site.
EPA had issued a fact sheet to the Site mailing list and published a
notice in the local paper, The Arizona Republic. We will work with ADEQ
and the City of Phoenix to update the Community Involvement Plan and
add other local newspapers and community groups to the outreach
strategy as suggested for future actions. The public will continue to
have an opportunity to comment to ADEQ, the lead agency, on any actions
or activities associated with the Site even after deletion,
particularly during the statutory Five-Year Review process.
Regarding future development at the Site, any plans would still
need to follow all the applicable criteria under CERCLA and the NCP,
and be protective of human health and the environment. In addition, the
City of Phoenix filed a Declaration of Environmental Use Restriction on
the property title in July 2006, prohibiting residential use and
ensuring a process by which no landowner will be allowed to interfere
with the remedy.
Summary of Comment #3, Letter from Karen O'Regan, City of Phoenix,
Environmental Programs: This comment is in ``support and concurrence''
with the deletion action, and an expression of the commitment the City
has to ensuring the remedy will be maintained and the groundwater
monitored. The City will work with ADEQ on any ``viable reuse
proposals''.
Response to Comment #3: EPA appreciates the concurrence, and on-
going commitment to ensure the remedy will be maintained. EPA
encourages the City to consider community concerns regarding the Site
in the future, particularly as associated with the issues expressed by
the community during this public comment period, and any input that may
be provided during additional community involvement activities.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended under [Arizona]
(``AZ'') by removing the entry for the Nineteenth Avenue Landfill site
in Phoenix, Arizona.
[FR Doc. 06-8175 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P