Draft Framework for Developing the National System of Marine Protected Areas, 55432-55434 [06-8077]
Download as PDF
55432
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/
statusreviews.htm
Rory
Saunders, NMFS Northeast Regional
Office, (207) 866–4049, or Pat Scida,
NMFS Northeast Regional Office, (978)
281–9208.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The ESA requires that FWS and
NMFS (Services) make listing
determinations based on the best
scientific and commercial information
available after conducting a review of
the status of species and after taking
into account efforts to protect the
species. In 1999 the Services completed
a review of the biological status of
Atlantic salmon in the United States.
Based on that status review, in
November 2000, the Services listed all
naturally reproducing remnant
populations of Atlantic salmon from the
Kennebec River downstream of the
former Edwards Dam site, northward to
the mouth of the St. Croix River
(excluding those fish inhabiting the
mainstem of the Penobscot River above
the site of the former Bangor Dam) as an
endangered Distinct Population
Segment (DPS) under the ESA. A
decision regarding whether or not to
include salmon that inhabited the
mainstems of the Kennebec River above
the former site of Edwards Dam and the
Penobscot River above the former site of
Bangor Dam was deferred by the
Services during the initial listing action
pending genetic analysis of these
populations.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
The 2006 Status Review
In response to the recent availability
of the genetic data for these populations,
the Services convened a BRT in late
2003 consisting of biologists from the
Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission,
Penobscot Indian Nation, NMFS, and
FWS. The BRT was charged with
reviewing and evaluating all relevant
scientific information relating to the
current DPS delineation, determining
the conservation status of the
populations for which a decision was
deferred in 2000, and assessing their
relationship to the currently listed Gulf
of Maine (GOM) DPS.
The BRT has completed its review of
the biological status of Atlantic salmon
in the United States, including an
assessment of the adequacy of protective
measures, the extent of implementation
of these measures, and the effect of
these measures on Atlantic salmon and
their habitat. This Status Review is an
update to the 1999 Atlantic salmon
Status Review and discusses the status
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:37 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
of salmon in the Androscoggin,
Kennebec, and Penobscot Rivers relative
to the currently listed GOM DPS.
Recent genetic studies indicate that
salmon inhabiting the Kennebec and
Penobscot Rivers are more closely
related to other salmon inhabiting the
GOM DPS than they are to those found
in Canada and other parts of the world.
Based on these studies, as well as other
zoogeographic, hydrographic, and life
history data, the new Status Review
concludes that the GOM DPS should be
comprised of all anadromous Atlantic
salmon whose freshwater range occurs
in the watersheds from the
Androscoggin River northward along
the Maine coast to the Dennys River,
including all associated conservation
hatchery populations used to
supplement natural populations;
currently, such populations are
maintained at Green Lake and Craig
Brook National Fish Hatcheries. A
population viability analysis (PVA) was
performed for the GOM DPS, including
the Androscoggin, Kennebec, and
Penobscot River populations, and is
discussed in the new Status Review.
The PVA is a way to estimate
population growth or decline over time.
In the new Atlantic salmon Status
Review, PVA projections suggest that
the likelihood of extinction of the GOM
DPS of Atlantic salmon ranges from 19
percent to 75 percent within the next
100 years. The Status Review also
includes a detailed analysis of threats to
the DPS (as delineated by the BRT).
NMFS contracted with the Center for
Independent Experts to have the 2006
Status Review independently peer
reviewed. The reviewers were asked to
address the following four questions:
(1) Is the species delineation
supported by the information
presented?
(2) Does the status review include and
cite the best available scientific and
commercial information available on the
species and threats to it and its habitat?
(3) Are the scientific conclusions
sound and derived logically from the
results?
(4) Where available, are opposing
scientific studies or theories
acknowledged and discussed?
This review has been completed and
provided to the BRT for their
consideration and response. The July
2006 version of the status review, which
is being made available to the public,
contains modifications made by the BRT
in light of the comments received from
four peer reviewers.
The Services jointly administer the
ESA as it applies to anadromous
Atlantic salmon. The Northeast Region
of NMFS and Region 5 of the FWS have
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entered into a Statement of Cooperation
in order to divide responsibility for ESA
implementation in order to enhance
efficiency and effectiveness. The
Services have agreed that NMFS would
be responsible for receiving the status
review from the BRT, conducting a peer
review on that status review, and
determining and preparing any
appropriate action under the ESA. It
was agreed that NMFS would prepare
and publish any associated Federal
Register notices. Pursuant to this
agreement, NMFS is currently
considering the information presented
in the new Status Review, the comments
from the peer reviewers, and the
response of the BRT to the peer
reviewers to determine if action under
the ESA is warranted. NMFS could
determine that a change to the
boundaries or conservation status of the
existing GOM DPS is warranted, that a
separate listing action is warranted, or
that no new action is warranted. If
NMFS determines that a modification to
the existing listing or a new listing is
warranted, then a proposed rule will be
published along with the rationale for
that proposal. A decision regarding
NMFS’ determination will be published
in the Federal Register.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
ESA, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch, III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06–8100 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Draft Framework for Developing the
National System of Marine Protected
Areas
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of availability and
solicitation of public comments on the
Draft Framework for Developing the
National System of Marine Protected
Areas.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NOAA and the Department of
the Interior (DOI) jointly propose the
Draft Framework for Developing the
National System of Marine Protected
Areas (Draft Framework), as required by
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices
Executive Order 13158 on Marine
Protected Areas (MPAs). This Draft
Framework provides overarching
guidance for collaborative efforts among
Federal, State, tribal and local
governments and stakeholders to
develop an effective National System of
MPAs (National System) from existing
sites, build coordination and
collaborative efforts, and identify
ecosystem-based gaps in the protection
of significant natural and cultural
resources for possible future action by
the nation’s MPA authorities. The
document further provides the guiding
principles, key definitions, goals, and
objectives for the National System,
based on the breadth of input received
from MPA stakeholders and
governmental partners around the
nation over the past several years. The
intent of this document is to solicit
additional public input on the proposed
Draft Framework in order to develop a
final document that meets the nation’s
interests in the National System.
DATES: Comments must be received
before 11:59 p.m. EDT, February 14,
2007.
All comments regarding the
Draft Framework should be submitted to
Joseph Uravitch, National MPA Center,
N/ORM, NOAA, 1305 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland
20910. Comments sent via e-mail should
be sent to mpa.comments@noaa.gov,
and all comments sent by fax should be
sent to 301–713–3110. E-mail and fax
comments should state ‘‘Draft
Framework Comments’’ in the subject
line.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please direct all questions and requests
for additional information concerning
the Draft Framework, as well as for
paper copies of the document to:
Jonathan Kelsey, NOAA, at 301–713–
3100, ext. 130 or via e-mail at
mpa.comments@noaa.gov. E-mail
requests should state either ‘‘Question’’
or ‘‘Paper Copy Request’’ in the subject
line. An electronic copy of the Draft
Framework is available for download at
https://www.mpa.gov/.
The
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration’s (NOAA) National
Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA
Center), in cooperation with the
Department of the Interior (DOI), has
developed a Draft Framework for
Developing the National System of
MPAs (Draft Framework) to meet
requirements under Executive Order
13158 on Marine Protected Areas
(Order). The purpose of this notice is to
solicit additional input and comments
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:37 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
on the Draft Framework from
governments and stakeholders in order
to ensure that the final document
represents the diversity of the nation’s
interests in the marine environment and
MPAs. NOAA and DOI recognize the
principal role that State and tribal
governments, along with Federal
agencies, must have in developing and
implementing the National System.
Roughly 85% of the nation’s existing
place-based conservation areas are
under the jurisdiction of non-Federal
governments. The significance of these
government-to-government
relationships and the marine resources
managed by States and tribes
necessitates this national, rather than
Federal, approach to building the
National System. In developing this
Draft Framework, NOAA and the DOI
have made and will continue to expand
efforts to understand and incorporate, as
appropriate, the recommendations of
government partners concerning a
structure and function for the National
System that builds partnerships with
and supports the efforts and voluntary
participation of State, tribal, and local
governments. MPA stakeholders and
Federal and non-Federal government
partners alike are encouraged to review
and provide comments on the Draft
Framework so that it supports the
variety of MPA efforts and interests
around the country.
Increasing impacts on the world’s
oceans, caused by development,
overfishing, and natural events, are
straining the health of our coastal and
marine ecosystems. Some of these
impacts to the marine and Great Lakes
environment have resulted in declining
fish populations; degradation of coral
reefs, seagrass beds, and other vital
habitats; threats to rare or endangered
species; and loss of artifacts and areas
that are part of our nation’s historic and
cultural heritage. The effects of these
mounting losses are being directly felt
in the social and economic fabric of our
nation’s communities.
MPAs offer a promising ocean and
coastal management tool to mitigate or
buffer these impacts. It is important to
clarify that the term ‘‘MPA,’’ as used
here, is not synonymous with or limited
to ‘‘no-take areas’’ or ‘‘marine reserves.’’
Instead, the term ‘‘MPA’’ denotes an
array of levels of protection, from areas
that allow multiple use activities to
those that restrict take and/or access.
When used effectively and in
conjunction with other management
tools, MPAs can help to ensure healthy
Great Lakes and oceans by contributing
to the overall protection of critical
marine habitats and resources. In this
way, effective MPAs can offer social and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55433
economic opportunities for current and
future generations, such as tourism,
biotechnology, fishing, education, and
scientific research.
Since 2001, the MPA Center and its
Federal, State, and tribal partners have
been collecting information on the vast
array of the nation’s place-based marine
conservation areas, including those
generally considered MPAs, to serve as
the foundation for building the National
System. This inventory has resulted in
the identification of at least 1,500 placebased sites established by hundreds of
Federal and State authorities. A number
of these existing sites are further
managed as systems by their respective
agencies or programs. The types of sites
found range from multiple-use areas to
no-take reserves. The vast majority of
these areas allow multiple uses, and less
than one percent of the total area under
management in the United States (U.S.)
is no-take. This inventory has also
revealed a dramatic increase in the use
of MPAs over the past several decades.
Most MPAs in the U.S. have been
established since 1970, and most allow
recreational and commercial uses. With
this expanded use of MPAs have come
many new and enhanced protections to
natural and cultural resources. A
preliminary analysis of U.S. place-based
conservation efforts reveals important
trends in how these areas, including
MPAs, are being used to conserve some
of the nation’s most significant marine
resources. The emerging results
illustrate that while there are many such
areas currently in U.S. waters, these
diverse sites vary widely in mandate,
jurisdiction, purpose, size, and level of
protection.
Moreover, this initial analysis
illustrates how the growing recognition
of MPAs as essential conservation tools
has resulted in a multitude of new MPA
programs and authorities at all levels of
government, often times for a sole
purpose or objective. There also are a
number of good examples where MPA
efforts are coordinated locally across
programs and levels of government;
however, there is no larger framework
for collaborating MPA efforts across
ecosystems and nationally to meet
common goals. This complex
environment leads to public confusion,
and, in many cases, conservation efforts
that are not as effective as they could be
with better coordination. The results of
this initial analysis have further
reinforced the need for a National
System and provided much of the
baseline information to begin building
it.
In recognition of the key role MPAs
can play and their growing use, the U.S.
is developing an effective National
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
55434
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices
System to support the effective
stewardship, lasting protection,
restoration, and sustainable use of the
nation’s significant natural and cultural
marine resources. The MPA Center is
charged by the Order to carry out these
requirements in cooperation with DOI.
Neither the Order nor the National
System establishes any new legal
authorities to designate or manage
MPAs, nor do they alter any existing
State, Federal, or tribal laws or
programs.
In addition, the U.S. Ocean Action
Plan (USOAP) outlines a variety of
actions for promoting the responsible
use and stewardship of ocean and
coastal resources for the benefit of all
Americans. A Cabinet-level ‘‘Committee
on Ocean Policy’’ (COP) was established
by Executive Order 13366 (December
17, 2004) to coordinate the activities of
executive branch departments and
agencies regarding ocean-related matters
in an integrated and effective manner to
advance the environmental and
economic interests of present and future
generations of Americans. The President
further directs the Executive branch
agencies to facilitate, as appropriate,
coordination and consultation regarding
ocean-related matters among Federal,
State, tribal, local governments, the
private sector, foreign governments, and
international organizations.
Subcommittees of the COP also have
been formed as part of the ocean
governance structure described in the
USOAP, including the Subcommittee on
Integrated Management of Ocean
Resources (SIMOR) and the Joint
Subcommittee on Ocean Science and
Technology. Many of the activities
outlined in the USOAP and the
subsequent work plans of the COP’s
subcommittees complement efforts to
develop the National System. Similarly,
many of the collaborative actions under
the National System may offer
opportunities to help advance the
USOAP. As these efforts proceed, the
MPA Center will work closely with
SIMOR to evaluate progress and plans
for developing the National System in
order to ensure coordination and
consistency with the USOAP’s
governance structure and overall
approach.
The MPA Center has developed this
Draft Framework based on information
from the initial analysis of information
about existing place-based conservation
efforts, along with comments from
hundreds of individuals at nearly sixty
meetings, initial tribal consultations,
and recommendations from Federal,
non-governmental and State advisory
groups. As a result, the proposed
collaborative development of an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:37 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
effective National System outlined in
this document provides a structure for
an assemblage of MPA sites, systems,
and networks established and managed
by Federal, State, tribal, and local
governments to collectively work
together at the regional and national
levels to achieve common objectives for
conserving the nation’s vital natural and
cultural resources.
By establishing an effective structure
for working together, the National
System will help to increase the
efficient protection of important marine
resources; contribute to the nation’s
overall social and economic health;
support government agency cooperation
and integration; and improve the
public’s access to scientific information
and decision-making about the nation’s
marine resources. The efforts of the
National System are also intended to
benefit participating State, tribal,
Federal, and local government partners
through collaborative efforts to identify
shared priorities for improving MPA
effectiveness and develop partnerships
to provide assistance in meeting those
needs. Further, it provides a foundation
for cooperation with other countries to
conserve resources of common concern.
In submitting your comments on the
Draft Framework, please remember that
comments submitted by e-mail are
preferred; however, those submitted by
mail and fax will also be accepted. An
extended comment period of 145 days is
being provided in order to accommodate
the quarterly meeting schedules of some
organizations, including regional fishery
management councils.
Classification
Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a regulatory action
subject to E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
Energy Effects
NOAA and DOI have determined that
this action will have no effect on energy
supply, distribution, or use and is
therefore not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ as defined by Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 18, 2001). No
Statement of Energy Effects is required
and therefore none has been prepared.
Government to Government
Relationship With Tribes
E.O. 13175—Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments— outlines the
responsibilities of the Federal
Government regarding its policies with
tribal implications, i.e., regulations,
legislative comments or proposed
legislation, and other policy statements
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or actions that have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Pursuant to
E.O. 13175, we will consult with tribal
governments as the National System is
developed.
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to authority at 5 U.S.C.
533(b)(A), prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given, as this document
concerns agency procedure or practice.
Nevertheless, NOAA and DOI want the
benefit of the public’s comment and are
hereby giving prior notice and
opportunity for public comment.
Dated: July 12, 2006.
Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr.,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Under
Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and
Atmosphere.
[FR Doc. 06–8077 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request—Flammability
Standards for Clothing Textiles and
Vinyl Plastic Film
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of July
11, 2006 (71 FR 39056), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission published a
notice in accordance with provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) to announce the
agency’s intention to seek an extension
of approval of a collection of
information in regulations
implementing the flammability
standards for clothing textiles and vinyl
plastic film. The regulations prescribe
requirements for testing and
recordkeeping by persons and firms
issuing guaranties of garments, fabrics,
and related materials subject to the
Standard for the Flammability of
Clothing Textiles (16 CFR part 1610)
and the Standard for the Flammability
of Vinyl Plastic Film (16 CFR part 1611).
No comments were received in response
to that notice. By publication of this
notice, the Commission announces that
it has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for an extension of approval of
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55432-55434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8077]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Draft Framework for Developing the National System of Marine
Protected Areas
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of availability and solicitation of public comments on
the Draft Framework for Developing the National System of Marine
Protected Areas.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NOAA and the Department of the Interior (DOI) jointly propose
the Draft Framework for Developing the National System of Marine
Protected Areas (Draft Framework), as required by
[[Page 55433]]
Executive Order 13158 on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). This Draft
Framework provides overarching guidance for collaborative efforts among
Federal, State, tribal and local governments and stakeholders to
develop an effective National System of MPAs (National System) from
existing sites, build coordination and collaborative efforts, and
identify ecosystem-based gaps in the protection of significant natural
and cultural resources for possible future action by the nation's MPA
authorities. The document further provides the guiding principles, key
definitions, goals, and objectives for the National System, based on
the breadth of input received from MPA stakeholders and governmental
partners around the nation over the past several years. The intent of
this document is to solicit additional public input on the proposed
Draft Framework in order to develop a final document that meets the
nation's interests in the National System.
DATES: Comments must be received before 11:59 p.m. EDT, February 14,
2007.
ADDRESSES: All comments regarding the Draft Framework should be
submitted to Joseph Uravitch, National MPA Center, N/ORM, NOAA, 1305
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. Comments sent via e-
mail should be sent to mpa.comments@noaa.gov, and all comments sent by
fax should be sent to 301-713-3110. E-mail and fax comments should
state ``Draft Framework Comments'' in the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct all questions and
requests for additional information concerning the Draft Framework, as
well as for paper copies of the document to: Jonathan Kelsey, NOAA, at
301-713-3100, ext. 130 or via e-mail at mpa.comments@noaa.gov. E-mail
requests should state either ``Question'' or ``Paper Copy Request'' in
the subject line. An electronic copy of the Draft Framework is
available for download at https://www.mpa.gov/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's (NOAA) National Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA
Center), in cooperation with the Department of the Interior (DOI), has
developed a Draft Framework for Developing the National System of MPAs
(Draft Framework) to meet requirements under Executive Order 13158 on
Marine Protected Areas (Order). The purpose of this notice is to
solicit additional input and comments on the Draft Framework from
governments and stakeholders in order to ensure that the final document
represents the diversity of the nation's interests in the marine
environment and MPAs. NOAA and DOI recognize the principal role that
State and tribal governments, along with Federal agencies, must have in
developing and implementing the National System. Roughly 85% of the
nation's existing place-based conservation areas are under the
jurisdiction of non-Federal governments. The significance of these
government-to-government relationships and the marine resources managed
by States and tribes necessitates this national, rather than Federal,
approach to building the National System. In developing this Draft
Framework, NOAA and the DOI have made and will continue to expand
efforts to understand and incorporate, as appropriate, the
recommendations of government partners concerning a structure and
function for the National System that builds partnerships with and
supports the efforts and voluntary participation of State, tribal, and
local governments. MPA stakeholders and Federal and non-Federal
government partners alike are encouraged to review and provide comments
on the Draft Framework so that it supports the variety of MPA efforts
and interests around the country.
Increasing impacts on the world's oceans, caused by development,
overfishing, and natural events, are straining the health of our
coastal and marine ecosystems. Some of these impacts to the marine and
Great Lakes environment have resulted in declining fish populations;
degradation of coral reefs, seagrass beds, and other vital habitats;
threats to rare or endangered species; and loss of artifacts and areas
that are part of our nation's historic and cultural heritage. The
effects of these mounting losses are being directly felt in the social
and economic fabric of our nation's communities.
MPAs offer a promising ocean and coastal management tool to
mitigate or buffer these impacts. It is important to clarify that the
term ``MPA,'' as used here, is not synonymous with or limited to ``no-
take areas'' or ``marine reserves.'' Instead, the term ``MPA'' denotes
an array of levels of protection, from areas that allow multiple use
activities to those that restrict take and/or access. When used
effectively and in conjunction with other management tools, MPAs can
help to ensure healthy Great Lakes and oceans by contributing to the
overall protection of critical marine habitats and resources. In this
way, effective MPAs can offer social and economic opportunities for
current and future generations, such as tourism, biotechnology,
fishing, education, and scientific research.
Since 2001, the MPA Center and its Federal, State, and tribal
partners have been collecting information on the vast array of the
nation's place-based marine conservation areas, including those
generally considered MPAs, to serve as the foundation for building the
National System. This inventory has resulted in the identification of
at least 1,500 place-based sites established by hundreds of Federal and
State authorities. A number of these existing sites are further managed
as systems by their respective agencies or programs. The types of sites
found range from multiple-use areas to no-take reserves. The vast
majority of these areas allow multiple uses, and less than one percent
of the total area under management in the United States (U.S.) is no-
take. This inventory has also revealed a dramatic increase in the use
of MPAs over the past several decades. Most MPAs in the U.S. have been
established since 1970, and most allow recreational and commercial
uses. With this expanded use of MPAs have come many new and enhanced
protections to natural and cultural resources. A preliminary analysis
of U.S. place-based conservation efforts reveals important trends in
how these areas, including MPAs, are being used to conserve some of the
nation's most significant marine resources. The emerging results
illustrate that while there are many such areas currently in U.S.
waters, these diverse sites vary widely in mandate, jurisdiction,
purpose, size, and level of protection.
Moreover, this initial analysis illustrates how the growing
recognition of MPAs as essential conservation tools has resulted in a
multitude of new MPA programs and authorities at all levels of
government, often times for a sole purpose or objective. There also are
a number of good examples where MPA efforts are coordinated locally
across programs and levels of government; however, there is no larger
framework for collaborating MPA efforts across ecosystems and
nationally to meet common goals. This complex environment leads to
public confusion, and, in many cases, conservation efforts that are not
as effective as they could be with better coordination. The results of
this initial analysis have further reinforced the need for a National
System and provided much of the baseline information to begin building
it.
In recognition of the key role MPAs can play and their growing use,
the U.S. is developing an effective National
[[Page 55434]]
System to support the effective stewardship, lasting protection,
restoration, and sustainable use of the nation's significant natural
and cultural marine resources. The MPA Center is charged by the Order
to carry out these requirements in cooperation with DOI. Neither the
Order nor the National System establishes any new legal authorities to
designate or manage MPAs, nor do they alter any existing State,
Federal, or tribal laws or programs.
In addition, the U.S. Ocean Action Plan (USOAP) outlines a variety
of actions for promoting the responsible use and stewardship of ocean
and coastal resources for the benefit of all Americans. A Cabinet-level
``Committee on Ocean Policy'' (COP) was established by Executive Order
13366 (December 17, 2004) to coordinate the activities of executive
branch departments and agencies regarding ocean-related matters in an
integrated and effective manner to advance the environmental and
economic interests of present and future generations of Americans. The
President further directs the Executive branch agencies to facilitate,
as appropriate, coordination and consultation regarding ocean-related
matters among Federal, State, tribal, local governments, the private
sector, foreign governments, and international organizations.
Subcommittees of the COP also have been formed as part of the ocean
governance structure described in the USOAP, including the Subcommittee
on Integrated Management of Ocean Resources (SIMOR) and the Joint
Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology. Many of the activities
outlined in the USOAP and the subsequent work plans of the COP's
subcommittees complement efforts to develop the National System.
Similarly, many of the collaborative actions under the National System
may offer opportunities to help advance the USOAP. As these efforts
proceed, the MPA Center will work closely with SIMOR to evaluate
progress and plans for developing the National System in order to
ensure coordination and consistency with the USOAP's governance
structure and overall approach.
The MPA Center has developed this Draft Framework based on
information from the initial analysis of information about existing
place-based conservation efforts, along with comments from hundreds of
individuals at nearly sixty meetings, initial tribal consultations, and
recommendations from Federal, non-governmental and State advisory
groups. As a result, the proposed collaborative development of an
effective National System outlined in this document provides a
structure for an assemblage of MPA sites, systems, and networks
established and managed by Federal, State, tribal, and local
governments to collectively work together at the regional and national
levels to achieve common objectives for conserving the nation's vital
natural and cultural resources.
By establishing an effective structure for working together, the
National System will help to increase the efficient protection of
important marine resources; contribute to the nation's overall social
and economic health; support government agency cooperation and
integration; and improve the public's access to scientific information
and decision-making about the nation's marine resources. The efforts of
the National System are also intended to benefit participating State,
tribal, Federal, and local government partners through collaborative
efforts to identify shared priorities for improving MPA effectiveness
and develop partnerships to provide assistance in meeting those needs.
Further, it provides a foundation for cooperation with other countries
to conserve resources of common concern.
In submitting your comments on the Draft Framework, please remember
that comments submitted by e-mail are preferred; however, those
submitted by mail and fax will also be accepted. An extended comment
period of 145 days is being provided in order to accommodate the
quarterly meeting schedules of some organizations, including regional
fishery management councils.
Classification
Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a regulatory action subject to E.O. 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993).
Energy Effects
NOAA and DOI have determined that this action will have no effect
on energy supply, distribution, or use and is therefore not a
``significant energy action'' as defined by Executive Order 13211 (66
FR 28355, May 18, 2001). No Statement of Energy Effects is required and
therefore none has been prepared.
Government to Government Relationship With Tribes
E.O. 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments-- outlines the responsibilities of the Federal Government
regarding its policies with tribal implications, i.e., regulations,
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000). Pursuant to E.O. 13175, we will consult with tribal
governments as the National System is developed.
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to authority at 5 U.S.C. 533(b)(A), prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not required to be given, as this
document concerns agency procedure or practice. Nevertheless, NOAA and
DOI want the benefit of the public's comment and are hereby giving
prior notice and opportunity for public comment.
Dated: July 12, 2006.
Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr.,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans
and Atmosphere.
[FR Doc. 06-8077 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-P