United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type), 55367-55369 [06-7869]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
55367
TABLE I.—INTERNAL DEFECTS—Continued
Defects
Damage
maximum allowed
Serious damage
maximum allowed
Internal Black Spot .............................................
When the spot(s) are darker than the official
color chip (POT–CC–2) after removing 5
percent of the total weight of the potato.
When the spot(s) are darker than the official
color chip (POT–CC–2) after removing 10
percent of the total weight of the potato.
Occurring entirely within the vascular ring
Hollow Heart or Hollow Heart with Discoloration.
Light Brown Discoloration (Brown Center).
Internal Brown Spot and Similar Discoloration
(Heat Necrosis).
1 Note:
Area affected not to exceed that of a circle 3⁄4
inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2 inches in
diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
Area affected not to exceed that of a circle 3⁄4
inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2 inches in
diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
Not more than the equivalent of 6 scattered
spots 1⁄8 inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2
inches in diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
Correspondingly lesser or greater areas in smaller or larger potatoes.
Dated: September 14, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7819 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 51
[Docket Number FV–06–304]
United States Standards for Grades of
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type)
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Area affected not to exceed that of a circle 1⁄2
inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2 inches in
diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
Area affected not to exceed that of a circle 1⁄2
inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2 inches in
diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
Not more than the equivalent of 3 scattered
spots 1⁄8 inch in diameter in a potato 21⁄2
inches in diameter or 6 ounces in weight.1
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA), is proposing a
revision to the voluntary United States
Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type). Two
industry associations requested the
standards be modified by adding a 10
percent allowance for shattered grapes
in consumer containers for shipment
that are en route or at destination. The
standards provide industry with a
common language and a uniform basis
for trading, thus promoting the orderly
and efficient marketing of European or
Vinifera Type table grapes.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization Section, Fresh
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:17 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room
1661 South Building, Stop 0240,
Washington, DC 20250–0240; fax (202)
720–8871; e-mail
FPB.DocketClerk@usda.gov. Comments
should make reference to the dates and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the above office
during regular business hours. The
United States Standards for Grades of
Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type) are available either through the
address cited above or by accessing the
AMS, Fresh Products Branch Web site
at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
fpbcheck.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheri L. Emery, at the above address,
telephone number (202) 720–2185, or email address Cheri.Emery@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
amended, directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘To develop
and improve standards of quality,
condition, quantity, grade and
packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request.
Executive Order 12866 and 12988
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action. This rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This action is not
intended to have retroactive effect. This
rule will not preempt any State or local
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this rule. There are no
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of the rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
Interested parties are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses. Comments also are
specifically requested on the number
and size of producers and handlers of
table grapes in United States.
This rule will revise the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type) that were
issued under the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946. Standards issued under the
1946 Act are voluntary.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
report of the 2002 Census of
Agriculture, there are 23,856 grape
farms in the United States. Using
additional data from the Noncitrus
Fruits and Nuts 2005 Summary, total
fresh utilization of grapes was 995,370
tons. Furthermore, the price per ton for
grapes in 2005 was $570.00 and the
value of grape utilized as fresh was
$567,523,000. Based on the number of
farms (23,856), the average producer
revenue from the sale of fresh grapes is
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
55368
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
estimated at approximately $23,789 per
year.
Small agricultural service firms,
which include handlers, have been
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $6,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
The number of table grape handlers in
the United States is not known.
However, we estimate that the majority
of such handlers may be classified as
small entities, reflecting the size of a
majority of handlers regulated under the
marketing order 7 CFR part 925. The
majority of handlers regulated under the
marketing order is approximately
twenty. Thus, the majority of fresh grape
producers and handlers, may be
classified as small entities.
The effects of this rule are not
expected to be disproportionately
greater or smaller for small handlers or
producers than for larger entities.
The use of grading services and
grading standards is voluntary unless
required by a specific Act, Federal
Marketing Order or Agreement, or other
regulations governing domestic, import
or export shipments.
USDA has not identified any Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule. There is a marketing
order program which regulates the
handling of European or Vinifera type
table grapes under 7 CFR part 925.
Further, Section 8e of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937
requires, whenever the Secretary of
Agriculture issues grade, size, quality or
maturity regulations under domestic
marketing orders for certain specified
commodities, the same or comparable
regulations on imports of those
commodities be issued. The revision
being proposed in this action only
affects shattered berries in consumer
size containers en route or at
destination. As such, the proposed
action would not affect table grapes
under the marketing order or under
Section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937.
This proposed change would modify
the standard by adding a 10 percent
allowance for shattered grapes in
shipments that are en route or at
destination and will make the standards
more consistent and uniform with
marketing trends and commodity
characteristics. This proposed action
will not impose any additional reporting
or recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large grape producers,
handlers, or importers.
Alternatives were considered for this
action. One alternative would be to not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:17 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
issue a proposed rule. However, the
need for revisions have increased as a
result of changing marketing
characteristics by industry, and the
proposal is the result of a request by
industry. Further, the purpose of these
standards is to facilitate the marketing
of agricultural commodities.
Background
AMS received petitions from the
California Grape and Tree Fruit League
and Western Growers Association,
requesting a revision to the United
States Standards for Grades of Table
Grapes (European or Vinifera Type) to
add an additional 10 percent allowance
for shattered grapes in consumer
containers for shipments that are en
route or at destination. The standards
currently provide in section 51.886,
Table II Tolerances En Route or at
Destination, a 12 percent total tolerance
for bunches and berries failing to meet
the requirements of grade for en route or
at destination. Revising section 51.886,
Table II by adding 10 percent allowance
for shattered would mean that shattered
berries would not be scored as a defect
against the 12 percent total tolerance
until the amount of shattered berries
exceeds the 10 percent allowance. For
example, if a lot of berries has 22
percent shattered berries, 12 percent
would be reported as a defect and the
lot would meet the requirements of the
U.S. No. 1 Table grade provided no
other defects were present; however, if
a lot of berries has 23 percent shattered
berries, 13 percent would be reported as
a defect, which would cause the lot to
fail meet the requirements of the U.S.
No. Table 1 grade by 1 percent. The
petitioners stated that they feel change,
specific to consumer containers, is
warranted as the majority of table grapes
are now being sold in consumer
containers which allow shattered berries
to be fully utilized/sold.
Prior to undertaking detailed work to
develop a proposed revision to the
standards, AMS published a notice on
January 24, 2006, in the Federal
Register (71 FR 3818) soliciting
comments on the proposed revision. In
response to the notice, AMS received
fourteen comments from the table grape
industry. The comments are available by
accessing the AMS, Fresh Products
Branch Web site at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
fpbdocketlist.htm.
Twelve comments supported the
proposal; one from a regional
agriculture trade association, one from a
table grape association and ten from
members of that table grape association.
Each of these comments indicated that
new improvements to consumer
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
packaging resulted in less shrinkage and
a more sellable product to consumers,
and with this improvement, a revision
of how shatter is scored was needed.
One comment opposing the proposal
was received from a national trade
association representing wholesale
produce receivers. The receivers’
association stated that an increase of
shattered grapes would be unfairly
damaging to receivers and consumers.
Finally, one comment was received
from a trade association of shippers of
table grapes from the State of Sonora,
Mexico. The shippers’ association
supported the idea of revisiting the
standards for table grapes, however, it
wanted to investigate the potential
effects of an added ten percent
allowance during the upcoming season
before supporting this revision. The
association indicated that the 10 percent
allowance seemed high. Additionally,
the association expressed a need to
reexamine the definitions of ‘‘bunch
size’’ and ‘‘straggly bunch’’ as it does
not believe the requirements under each
definition accurately represent the
current market demands for table
grapes. These additional matters are
beyond the scope of the proposed
revision, and therefore they will not be
addressed in this action.
Taking into account the comments
received, AMS believes that it would be
more beneficial to the overall industry
to fully utilize shattered berries that are
not otherwise defective, in consumer
containers. The majority of table grapes
are now sold in consumer containers.
Further, this action provides for a 60day comment period for interested
parties to comment on the proposed
revision.
Accordingly, AMS proposes to amend
the United States Standards for Grades
of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type) as follows:
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 51
Agricultural commodities, Food
grades and standards, Fruits, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trees, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
7 CFR part 51 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 51—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621—1627.
2. In § 51.886, paragraph (b), Table II
is revised to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
55369
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(b) * * *
Subpart—United States Standards for
Grades of Table Grapes (European or
Vinifera Type)
§ 51.886
*
*
Tolerances.
*
*
*
TABLE II.—TOLERANCES EN ROUTE OR AT DESTINATION
U.S. extra
fancy table
Factor
(A) For bunches failing to meet color requirements ....................................................................
(B) For bunches failing to meet requirements for minimum diameter of berries ........................
(C) For bunches failing to meet stem color requirements ..........................................................
(D) For offsize bunches and for bunches and berries failing to meet the remaining requirements for the grade ..................................................................................................................
(E) For shattered berries in consumer size packages an allowance of 10 percent is provided.
Any percent of shattered berries exceeding the allowance of 10 percent shall be scored as
berries failing to meet the requirements of the grade.
Including in (D):
(a) For permanent defects ....................................................................................................
(b) For serious damage ........................................................................................................
And, including in (b):
(i) For serious damage by permanent defects .....................................................................
(ii) For decay ........................................................................................................................
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7869 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 91 and 92
[Docket Number ST–05–01]
RIN 0581–AC48
Changes in Hourly Fee Rates for
Science and Technology Laboratory
Services—Fiscal Years 2007–2009
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is proposing to change
the hourly fee rates for Science and
Technology (S&T) Laboratory Services.
The agency is proposing to raise these
rates to reflect, among other factors,
national and locality pay increases for
Federal employees and inflation,
operating costs, instrumentation and
training, and program and agency
administrative overhead costs. In the
past, AMS has amended its regulations
on an as needed basis in order to
recover laboratory program costs. With
this proposed regulation, AMS is
providing for three annual standard
hourly fee rate increases for fiscal years
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:43 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
2007–2009. This would provide the
agricultural commodity industries and
other stakeholders with more timely and
relevant information regarding
voluntary user fees for laboratory testing
services. The agency is also proposing to
remove tables and schedules with
listings of individual tests and services.
Three annual hourly fee rate
adjustments are proposed for appeals,
holiday, and overtime services to reflect
the anticipated increase in cost of
providing these laboratory services each
fiscal year. The regulations also are
updated to identify current facility
addresses. Part 92 is obsolete and
therefore has been removed.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to James V.
Falk, Docket Manager, USDA, AMS,
Science and Technology Programs, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop
0272, Washington, DC 20250–0272;
telephone (202) 690–4089; fax (202)
720–4631, or e-mail:
James.falk@usda.gov. State that your
comments refer to Docket No. ST–05–
01. Comments may also be submitted
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments will be available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in Room 1090 South Building,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Robert L. Epstein, Science and
Technology Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, United States
Department of Agriculture, Mail Stop
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S. fancy
table
U.S. No. 1
table
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
12
12
8
4
8
4
8
4
2
1
2
1
2
1
0270, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0270, telephone
number (202) 720–5231; fax (202) 720–
6496, and e-mail:
Robert.epstein@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Science and Technology (S&T)
Programs has been performing voluntary
laboratory services under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as
amended, for the AMS commodity
programs (Fruit and Vegetable, Cotton,
Livestock and Seed, Poultry, Dairy, and
Tobacco) and applicable customers in
these industries since its inception on
August 17, 1988. Before that, voluntary
laboratory testing was provided for a
user fee by AMS under the various
commodity programs. The current
standard hourly rate of $45.00 and the
premium hourly rate of $67.50 have
been in effect since publication in the
Federal Register on October 27, 2000
(65 FR 64302). The standard fee rate for
laboratory services is proposed to be
increased to $60.00 per hour in fiscal
year 2007, $63.00 per hour in fiscal year
2008, and $67.00 per hour in fiscal year
2009. The premium hourly fee rates
would also be adjusted for fiscal years
2007 through 2009. An increase in the
premium hourly rates over the three
fiscal years for laboratory services
performed on holidays, appeal samples,
and overtime basis is also needed since
Science and Technology laboratory
personnel may be required to work
extended hours of service at the time
and a half pay or the double hourly pay
to accommodate clients. This is due to
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55367-55369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7869]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 51
[Docket Number FV-06-304]
United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes (European or
Vinifera Type)
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA), is proposing a revision to the voluntary United
States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera
Type). Two industry associations requested the standards be modified by
adding a 10 percent allowance for shattered grapes in consumer
containers for shipment that are en route or at destination. The
standards provide industry with a common language and a uniform basis
for trading, thus promoting the orderly and efficient marketing of
European or Vinifera Type table grapes.
DATES: Comments must be received by November 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization Section, Fresh Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 1661 South Building,
Stop 0240, Washington, DC 20250-0240; fax (202) 720-8871; e-mail
FPB.DocketClerk@usda.gov. Comments should make reference to the dates
and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made
available for public inspection in the above office during regular
business hours. The United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type) are available either through the address
cited above or by accessing the AMS, Fresh Products Branch Web site at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/fpbcheck.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheri L. Emery, at the above address,
telephone number (202) 720-2185, or e-mail address
Cheri.Emery@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627), as amended, directs and authorizes
the Secretary of Agriculture ``To develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade and packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to encourage uniformity and
consistency in commercial practices.'' AMS is committed to carrying out
this authority in a manner that facilitates the marketing of
agricultural commodities and makes copies of official standards
available upon request.
Executive Order 12866 and 12988
The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action. This rule has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This action
is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt
any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present
an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to
the provisions of the rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory
actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately
burdened. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. Interested parties are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses. Comments also are specifically requested on the
number and size of producers and handlers of table grapes in United
States.
This rule will revise the U.S. Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type) that were issued under the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946. Standards issued under the 1946 Act are
voluntary.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
report of the 2002 Census of Agriculture, there are 23,856 grape farms
in the United States. Using additional data from the Noncitrus Fruits
and Nuts 2005 Summary, total fresh utilization of grapes was 995,370
tons. Furthermore, the price per ton for grapes in 2005 was $570.00 and
the value of grape utilized as fresh was $567,523,000. Based on the
number of farms (23,856), the average producer revenue from the sale of
fresh grapes is
[[Page 55368]]
estimated at approximately $23,789 per year.
Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers, have been
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000. The number of table grape handlers in the United
States is not known. However, we estimate that the majority of such
handlers may be classified as small entities, reflecting the size of a
majority of handlers regulated under the marketing order 7 CFR part
925. The majority of handlers regulated under the marketing order is
approximately twenty. Thus, the majority of fresh grape producers and
handlers, may be classified as small entities.
The effects of this rule are not expected to be disproportionately
greater or smaller for small handlers or producers than for larger
entities.
The use of grading services and grading standards is voluntary
unless required by a specific Act, Federal Marketing Order or
Agreement, or other regulations governing domestic, import or export
shipments.
USDA has not identified any Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule. There is a marketing order program which
regulates the handling of European or Vinifera type table grapes under
7 CFR part 925. Further, Section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937 requires, whenever the Secretary of Agriculture
issues grade, size, quality or maturity regulations under domestic
marketing orders for certain specified commodities, the same or
comparable regulations on imports of those commodities be issued. The
revision being proposed in this action only affects shattered berries
in consumer size containers en route or at destination. As such, the
proposed action would not affect table grapes under the marketing order
or under Section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937.
This proposed change would modify the standard by adding a 10
percent allowance for shattered grapes in shipments that are en route
or at destination and will make the standards more consistent and
uniform with marketing trends and commodity characteristics. This
proposed action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large grape producers,
handlers, or importers.
Alternatives were considered for this action. One alternative would
be to not issue a proposed rule. However, the need for revisions have
increased as a result of changing marketing characteristics by
industry, and the proposal is the result of a request by industry.
Further, the purpose of these standards is to facilitate the marketing
of agricultural commodities.
Background
AMS received petitions from the California Grape and Tree Fruit
League and Western Growers Association, requesting a revision to the
United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes (European or
Vinifera Type) to add an additional 10 percent allowance for shattered
grapes in consumer containers for shipments that are en route or at
destination. The standards currently provide in section 51.886, Table
II Tolerances En Route or at Destination, a 12 percent total tolerance
for bunches and berries failing to meet the requirements of grade for
en route or at destination. Revising section 51.886, Table II by adding
10 percent allowance for shattered would mean that shattered berries
would not be scored as a defect against the 12 percent total tolerance
until the amount of shattered berries exceeds the 10 percent allowance.
For example, if a lot of berries has 22 percent shattered berries, 12
percent would be reported as a defect and the lot would meet the
requirements of the U.S. No. 1 Table grade provided no other defects
were present; however, if a lot of berries has 23 percent shattered
berries, 13 percent would be reported as a defect, which would cause
the lot to fail meet the requirements of the U.S. No. Table 1 grade by
1 percent. The petitioners stated that they feel change, specific to
consumer containers, is warranted as the majority of table grapes are
now being sold in consumer containers which allow shattered berries to
be fully utilized/sold.
Prior to undertaking detailed work to develop a proposed revision
to the standards, AMS published a notice on January 24, 2006, in the
Federal Register (71 FR 3818) soliciting comments on the proposed
revision. In response to the notice, AMS received fourteen comments
from the table grape industry. The comments are available by accessing
the AMS, Fresh Products Branch Web site at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
fpbdocketlist.htm.
Twelve comments supported the proposal; one from a regional
agriculture trade association, one from a table grape association and
ten from members of that table grape association. Each of these
comments indicated that new improvements to consumer packaging resulted
in less shrinkage and a more sellable product to consumers, and with
this improvement, a revision of how shatter is scored was needed. One
comment opposing the proposal was received from a national trade
association representing wholesale produce receivers. The receivers'
association stated that an increase of shattered grapes would be
unfairly damaging to receivers and consumers.
Finally, one comment was received from a trade association of
shippers of table grapes from the State of Sonora, Mexico. The
shippers' association supported the idea of revisiting the standards
for table grapes, however, it wanted to investigate the potential
effects of an added ten percent allowance during the upcoming season
before supporting this revision. The association indicated that the 10
percent allowance seemed high. Additionally, the association expressed
a need to reexamine the definitions of ``bunch size'' and ``straggly
bunch'' as it does not believe the requirements under each definition
accurately represent the current market demands for table grapes. These
additional matters are beyond the scope of the proposed revision, and
therefore they will not be addressed in this action.
Taking into account the comments received, AMS believes that it
would be more beneficial to the overall industry to fully utilize
shattered berries that are not otherwise defective, in consumer
containers. The majority of table grapes are now sold in consumer
containers. Further, this action provides for a 60-day comment period
for interested parties to comment on the proposed revision.
Accordingly, AMS proposes to amend the United States Standards for
Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type) as follows:
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 51
Agricultural commodities, Food grades and standards, Fruits, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trees, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 51 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 51--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621--1627.
2. In Sec. 51.886, paragraph (b), Table II is revised to read as
follows:
[[Page 55369]]
Subpart--United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes
(European or Vinifera Type)
Sec. 51.886 Tolerances.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Table II.--Tolerances En Route or at Destination
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. extra U.S. fancy U.S. No. 1
Factor fancy table table table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) For bunches failing to meet color requirements.............. 10 10 10
(B) For bunches failing to meet requirements for minimum 10 10 10
diameter of berries............................................
(C) For bunches failing to meet stem color requirements......... 10 ..............
(D) For offsize bunches and for bunches and berries failing to 12 12 12
meet the remaining requirements for the grade..................
(E) For shattered berries in consumer size packages an allowance ..............
of 10 percent is provided. Any percent of shattered berries
exceeding the allowance of 10 percent shall be scored as
berries failing to meet the requirements of the grade.
Including in (D):
(a) For permanent defects................................... 8 8 8
(b) For serious damage...................................... 4 4 4
And, including in (b):
(i) For serious damage by permanent defects................. 2 2 2
(ii) For decay.............................................. 1 1 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7869 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P